Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, February 11, 2017

Four killed in southern Philippines earthquake, infrastructure damaged


Debris from a building of Surigao State College and Technology is seen on a car after an earthquake hit Surigao city, southern Philippines Feb 10, 2017. Source: Reuters/Roel Catoto-Mindanews
11th February 2017
FOUR people died and more than 100 were injured after a powerful earthquake struck the island of Mindanao in the southern Philippines late Friday, damaging some structures and cutting power in many areas, local officials said.
The 6.7 earthquake occurred at a depth of 10 km and the epicentre was about 13 km east of the city of Surigao, the U.S. Geological Survey reported.
The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said there was no tsunami threat from the earthquake.
Confined patients of Miranda Family hospital stay outside after an earthquake hit Surigao city, southern Philippines Feb 10, 2017. Source: Reuters/Roel Catoto-Mindanews
Renato Solidum, head of the Philippines’ seismic agency, said on radio on Saturday morning 89 aftershocks had been recorded and more could be expected but they were unlikely to cause significant damage.
Friday’s quake was the strongest since the city was rocked by a 6.9 quake in 1879, Solidum said.
People rushed to open spaces and spent the night in parks and shelter areas, according to radio reports.
Power-lines were down, water supply was interrupted, a bridge and a hotel collapsed and some homes were damaged, Surigao City Councilor Rise Recabo told DZRH radio.
Officials closed Surigao’s airport because of cracks on the runway.
The Philippines is on the geologically active Pacific Ring of Fire and experiences frequent earthquakes. – Reuters

Can I trust a fertility app to stop me getting pregnant?

contraceptive app
By Lindsay Brown-9 February 2017
Sexual health experts say more research is needed into the effectiveness of fertility tracking apps in preventing pregnancy.
The warning comes after the first such app - Natural Cycles - was given an official approval as a method of contraception.
In 2015 a clinical study showed that the app was as effective as the pill.
The app works by getting women to enter their body temperatures, ovulation test results and date of menstruation.
An algorithm (a set of rules to help solve a problem, run by computer software) then determines whether a woman is fertile on that day.
This should help her make a decision about having unprotected sex.
But while sexual experts agreed fertility awareness apps have great potential to broaden contraception choice - three organisations warned on Thursday that being classed as a medical device doesn't guarantee the app will effectively prevent pregnancy.
Natural Cycles
Image captionThe app is used by more than 150,000 women in 161 countries.
The sexual health charity FPA, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Health of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (FSRH) and Dr Cecilia Pyper of the University of Oxford and FertilityUK said that these kind of apps often have complicated instructions that need to be strictly followed, if they are to be effective.
Natural Cycles was approved as a class IIb medical device by Tüv Süd, which means it can now be marketed as a hormone-free, non-invasive contraceptive option.
contraceptive app
Image captionFertility awareness apps are based on fertility awareness methods - also known as natural family planning
Dr Elina Berglund, co-founder of Natural Cycles, said: "Women around the world are interested in exploring effective non-hormonal, non-invasive forms of contraception - and now they have a new, clinically verified and regulatory approved option to choose from.
"Our high quality clinical studies, together with the required regulatory approvals, means we can provide women everywhere with a new option for contraception."
Natural Cycles
Image captionWomen enter their temperature into the app to try and determine their fertility
But is natural contraception the best way in preventing unwanted pregnancy?
"It's important when considering contraception that women aren't misled into thinking that non-hormonal contraception, whether that's the IUD, condoms or fertility awareness, is always a better choice than hormonal contraception," says Natika Halil, from the Family Planning Association.
"Although hormonal contraception has some potential side-effects and health risks, it can also have a range of benefits such as controlling menstrual bleeding, reducing PMS symptoms and managing acne."
the pill
Image captionNatural Cycles is said to be as effective as the pill
Dr Cecilia Pyper from Fertility UK said more research needs to be done into fertility apps.
"There are currently hundreds of fertility apps and period trackers and no system to evaluate these technologies, which are changing at a very fast pace.
"The research we do have suggests that many are ineffective at accurately predicting a woman's fertile days.
"Large, independently-conducted prospective trials are needed before apps can be considered for contraceptive use."
For more help and information on contraception, visit these BBC pages.
Find us on Instagram at BBCNewsbeat and follow us on Snapchat, search for bbc_newsbeat

Friday, February 10, 2017

On Keppapulavu




Featured image courtesy Garikaalan
RAISA WICKREMATUNGE on 02/09/2017

February 9 marks the tenth day of protests in Keppapulavu, a village in Mullaitivu, where residents are demanding the return of their land. Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe is meeting with representatives of the Keppapulavu protests – but the struggle for the return of their land has been ongoing for yearsGroundviews compiled the reportage on the issue, in tandem with the recent hunger strike by families of the missing in Vavuniya. Click here to view the story, compiled on Storify, or see the embed below:

PM WICKREMESINGHE PROPOSES TO CURB POWERS OF THE OFFICE ON MISSING PERSONS

Image: In August 2016 Families of the disappeared marched in Colombo supporting OMP. ©s.deshapriya.

Sri Lanka Brief10/02/2017

The Office on Missing Persons is to be stripped of its power of entering into agreements with an individual or an organization, reports The Island.

Cabinet had on Tuesday approved a proposal by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe to repeal paragraph (A) of Article 11 of the Office on Missing Persons (Establishment, Administration and Discharge of Functions) Act No 14 of 2016, which authorised the office to enter into agreements with an individual or an organization in performing its tasks.

The reason for this revision has not been given by the government.

The Office on Missing Persons Act was passed in Parliament on August 23, 2016.

Prez agreed to go the whole hog-civil society


Constitutional reforms



Maithripala Sirisenaby Shamindra Ferdinando- 

President Maithripala Sirisena and a group of nearly 50 civil society organizations have agreed that the proposed new constitution should be subjected to a referendum.

 Their stand is compatible with that of the UNP, main coalition partner in the government strongly pushing for a brand new constitution in accordance with an understanding reached with the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council. 

Although, they haven’t discussed a possible time frame, UNP national list MP and constitutional expert Dr Jayampathy Wickremaratne has assured the gathering at the Presidential Secretariat on Wednesday (Feb 8) that the draft constitution would be handed over to President Sirisena soon. 

Government Nursing Officers’ Association President Saman Ratnapriya, in a brief interview with The Island, on behalf of the consortium of civil society organizations said that they had reached consensus on a course of action to bring in a new constitution with the approval of the electorate. The civil society representatives included Ven. Dambara Amila thera, Ven Thiniyawala Palitha thera (director of Lanka Hospitals), Gamini Viyangoda and Nirmal Ranjith.

The meeting between the President and the group lasted for about two hours, the third since the former was elected at the January 2015 poll.

 Underscoring the pivotal role played by the civil society grouping in the political project to oust the previous government in January 2015, Ratnapriya emphasized their resolve to bring in a new constitution to address the grievances of the people. Ratnapriya quoted President’s Counsel and ex-Lanka Sama Samaja Party (LSSP) stalwart Wickramaratne as having said that the draft constitution could be handed over to President Sirisena next week.

 Dr Wickremaratne, a member of the Steering Committee drafting the new Constitution had been among two members of parliament present on the occasion with the other being UNP MP Arjuna Ranatunga.

 Ratnapriya acknowledged that the Steering Committee appointed by the Constitutional Assembly chaired by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe hadn’t been able to finalise the draft constitution on Jan 5-6 session as originally planned. Had they been able to reach consensus at the two-day meet in parliament, the report was to be presented to the Constitutional Assembly comprising all MPs.

Ratnapriya said that the proposed report would be essentially based on the six sub-committee reports on fundamental rights, the judiciary, law and order, public service, public finance and centre-periphery relations.

The 21-member Steering Committee constituting representatives of all political parties in Parliament, has been deliberating on core subject areas pertaining to the nature of the State, form and structure of government, principles of devolution, religion, electoral reforms and land.

 Ratnapriya said that on behalf of the group he called for electoral reforms, law and order, post-war national reconciliation measures as well as the abolition of the executive presidency.

Asked whether President Sirisena had been explicit in his support for the civil society project, Ratnapriya said that the President in his capacity as the leader of the SLFP had assured his party’s support and commitment to the daunting task.

The civil society grouping has received President Sirisena’s assurance against the backdrop of mounting pressure on him as well as the SLFP not to go for a referendum. Those opposed to a referendum had repeatedly said that Sirisena’s presidential election manifesto was quite clear about the new constitution. They have pointed out that Sirisena promised to introduce constitutional amendments which could be accommodated without being subjected to a referendum.

Leader of the House and Higher Education Minister Lakshman Kiriella’s recent declaration that the UNP would go for a referendum with the support of the SLFP should be examined in the backdrop of the civil society receiving an assurance from President Sirisena for a referendum.

 "We are ready to go all-out is campaigning to ensure success at a referendum," Ratnapriya said, adding, "I raised the issue with SLFP General Secretary Minister Mahinda Amaraweera on Thursday night. Minister Amaraweera reiterated his commitment to the project".

Ratnapriya told The Island that civil society representatives repeated their request that several courts be assigned to hear cases pertaining to corruption and killings that had taken place during the previous administration. Ratnapriya quoted President Sirisena as having said that instructions had been issued to the IGP as well as the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) and the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) to expedite inquiries meant to prosecute the wrongdoers regardless of their standing in society.

Sri Lanka War Crimes Probe: UN Urged Not To Give Additional Time


Colombo Telegraph
Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran – PM – TGTE-February 10, 2017
The Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE) passed a Resolution in its Sixth Parliamentary sitting in Paris, France, thanking the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) for monitoring Sri Lanka’s International Crimes and Human Rights abuses, strongly urging the UNHRC not to give any extension of time beyond the March 2017 deadline to the Sri Lankan Government for it to fulfill its commitment to the unanimously adopted UN Human Rights Council Resolution 30/1, which was voluntarily co-sponsored by Sri Lanka itself on “promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka”.

Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran – PM – TGTE
The TGTE Resolution while encouraging the UNHRC to remain seized with accountability and transitional justice in Sri Lanka, requests it to refer the matter to the UN General Assembly with the recommendation to the Security Council that the case for war crimes, crimes against humanity be sent to the International Criminal Court (ICC) or that an ad-hoc International Criminal Tribunal be created on Sri Lanka.
The Resolution states that any extension of time will embolden and encourage Sri Lankan Government to commit human rights abuses against Tamils without any fear and Tamils’ safety will be in danger. It notes that tens of thousands Sri Lankan Security forces that committed mass killings and sexual violence are still stationed in Tamil areas and live among the victims. There are numerous reports of current abuses committed against Tamils including a recent report by UN Special Rapporteur on torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Mr. Juan Mendez.
The Resolution notes that the Sri Lankan government’s continued disregard of human rights norms even today as demonstrated by the above mentioned reports on continuing militarized environment, torture and sexual abuses is further proof that the war crimes of 2008/2009 will not be addressed.
The Resolution points out “as Sri Lanka has accomplished almost none of the commitments it voluntarily made in 2015 to the UN Human Rights Council, any extension of time given to Sri Lanka beyond March 2017 will result in no accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity it committed against Tamils.”
The Resolution also highlights that any number of years of extension would not yield any results, because there was no political will by the successive Sri Lankan Governments.
“Sri Lanka is attempting to drag this accountability process on and on until it falls off the international agenda, thus escaping from accountability and for the mass killing and sexual violence of Tamils in 2009 in Mullivsaikaal, where according to the UN Internal Review report on Sri Lanka around 70 thousand Tamils were killed in six months.”
The Resolution points out that “the extension of time to Sri Lanka will also embolden other abusive countries around the world to commit mass killings and sexual violence without any fear and follow Sri Lanka’s example to evade UN Human Right’s Council’s Resolutions.”
The Resolution compared Sri Lanka’s impunity with that of North Korea. In the case of North Korea, it was only accused of committing Crimes against Humanity, but Sri Lanka was accused of committing both War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity.
Documented evidence against Sri Lanka is far more extensive, in-depth, and numerous in comparison to North Korea.
Due to North Korea’s inaction, the UN Human Rights Council referred North Korea to the UN General Assembly, urging the Assembly to recommend the UN Security Council to refer North Korea to the International Criminal Court (ICC).
The Resolution points out that consistency is an important element of credibility and warns that failure to refer Sri Lanka to General Assembly and Security Council will damage UN HRC’s credibility and will weaken this important institution.

Sri Lanka: Ethnic problem after Trump

The crucially important point here is that there are powerful factors impelling a close Indo-US rapprochement. The populist surge in the US is part of a surge in several European countries, which should be seen in relation to the appeal of identity politics and neo-Fascism in a good part of the third world.

by Izeth Hussain-
( February 11, 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Soon after Trump’s triumph at the US Presidential elections, speculation began in Sri Lanka that the Government’s position could become easier at the Geneva UN Human Rights Council. It has been known that the US was the main mover behind the UNHRC Resolution of 2015 that has been causing so much turmoil in Sri Lanka. Trump has been emphatic both in his election campaign and thereafter about his America first policy: he would make the NATO allies pay up for the facilities provided by the US, the US would withdraw from unnecessary foreign entanglements, and so on. The important point is that none of the vital interests of the US are involved in the Tamil ethnic problem. Therefore an easing of US pressure at the UNHRC seems quite feasible, and the Government should obviously try to avail of opportunities that might arise as a consequence. However we should not be over-sanguine about what might be achieved thereby. US pressure could ease, but that could be replaced by pressure from others.
I will now make some observations on the significance of Trump’s triumph, which could spell changes of an epochal order. It has been widely noted, and indeed accepted without demur, that his triumph is the consequence of an upsurge of populism in the US. It has also been widely noted that populism represents an important strand in American politics. I wrote earlier about Robert Pen Warren’s best novel All the King’s Men based on the populist Governor Huey Long, which led to two Hollywood films, and I wrote also about Thurber’s satirical story based on the aviator Charles Lindberg who was notoriously an admirer of the Nazis. I now find that Philip Roth, one of the best-known contemporary American novelists, published in 2004 The Plot against America in which he depicted an alternative history: Lindberg takes power in 1940, comes to terms with Hitler, and institutes an anti-Semitic program. So, populism is something that is deeply ingrained in the American political psyche. All the same, liberal democracy is far more deeply ingrained and can be expected to reassert its predominance after some time, though it will have to undergo some transformations if it is to prevail as the wave of the future in the US and elsewhere.
The other significance of Trump’s triumph is that it shows – clearly enough to my mind – the demise of American imperialism, which seems to have escaped popular notice unlike the factor of populism. Though hardly noticed, it is certainly change of an epochal order. It is that because the US has had dominant power over the globe since 1945. In fact it has been the predominant power in the world since 1919 because of its economic power. Trump’s America first policy signifies a desire for withdrawal from an excessive involvement with the affairs of the rest of the world, from imperialist over-reach, a desire for isolationism which is also an important part of American political tradition as shown by American semi-isolationism from 1919 to 1941. There are two major reasons for the demise of American imperialism. The US simply does not have the economic resources to impose its dominance on other countries on a wide scale. In 1965 the CIA started a program to engineer coups and install military dictatorships in several African countries, and the first act of the dictators after assuming power was to ask the Chinese Embassies to fold up and get out. Today the Chinese cannot be treated in that way because those African countries have to depend on Chinese investments which cannot be matched by the US. That situation is replicated in Sri Lanka where our only way of escaping pauperdom – the result of the last Government’s folly – is to change Chinese loans into equity. The Americans and the Indians can only watch. The other major reason for the demise of American imperialism is that for complex factors the peoples of the third world are more resistant to imperialism than ever before. I saw President Marcos and the fair Imelda behave like servants to the American Ambassador. Today that is unthinkable with President Duterte. I must add that as for US military power, the truth is that the Americans can destroy the world but they cannot dominate it. This single paragraph will have to suffice in this brief article to bring out the essential facts about American imperialism today. The interested reader can turn to books on that subject by Chalmers Johnson, Noam Chomsky, George Soros etc., and above all Emmanuel Todd’s 2004 classic After Empire.
What is the relevance of the two preceding paragraphs on the significance of Trump’s triumph to the subject of this article which is on the impact of that triumph on our ethnic problem? I have argued in earlier articles that our Tamil ethnic problem is not a purely indigenous problem but an Indo-Tamil one. If not for the possible fall out in Tamil Nadu of what is done to the Tamils here, Delhi will have no legitimate concern about it nor will the rest of the international community. If not for the Tamil Nadu factor, our Tamils will be just another defeated minority whose fate will not rouse international concern unless their human rights are violated on a horrendous scale. Consequently, the questioned that should be posed is this: What might be the impact of Trump’s triumph on Indo-US relations, more specifically in relation to the Tamil ethnic problem?
The crucially important point here is that there are powerful factors impelling a close Indo-US rapprochement. The populist surge in the US is part of a surge in several European countries, which should be seen in relation to the appeal of identity politics and neo-Fascism in a good part of the third world. It seems to me that the two most powerful ideological trends in the world today are liberal democracy and populism or neo-Fascism, though the latter is not properly understood nor even recognized. The two trends can co-exist in the same country, and probably do in most countries. In the US today we have a populist leader who has to function within a liberal democratic framework and that seems to be true also of India. Trump is indisputably Islamophobic and Prime Minister Modi stood accused of backing the Gujarat massacre of Muslims. There could be some measure of ideological common ground between the two leaders.
Far more important than the ideological factor however is the geopolitical one. Trump’s isolationism is really semi-isolationism because he is resolved on countering China, which for obvious reasons impels close Indo-US rapprochement. This geopolitical factor is so well known and so well understood that I will not say anything more about it here. Because of that factor there is reason to wonder whether the US will agree to ease the pressure on us at the UNHRC. Certainly Trump has deplored US insistence on the observance of human rights abroad when its own record stinks to high heaven. That could dictate an easing of the pressure at Geneva but we cannot be sure. I believe that it all depends on India, which can easily get other Western countries to lead the exercise of exerting pressure on us, if that becomes necessary.
What should we do? The Government most injudiciously went to the extent of co-sponsoring the 2015 UNHRC Resolution. The Pathfinder Foundation has made out an excellent case in the Island of February 8 for asking for a revision of the 2015 Resolution. For this purpose the country that has to be persuaded is India, far more than the US or any other. I have my ideas on the case that should be advanced by us but that will require a separate article. I will conclude this one by pointing to a recent development that should make us think. India’s Supreme Court ruled against the Dravidian practice of taming the bull on the ground that it involved cruelty to animals. That provoked huge defiant demonstrations in the Dravidian South, at some of which there were posters portraying Prabhakaran. The moral that I draw is that we should not allow the ethnic imbroglio to be protracted indefinitely.

Targeting The TNA, Testing The Nation?

by N. Sathiya Moorthy-by N. Sathiya Moorthy

  • Sumanthiran has also emerged as the moderate voice of post-war Tamil polity and society
  • Rehabilitated cadres may have been trained and are skilled in trades, but did not have a job or any other source of income
  • Definitely LTTE re-grouping of the terrorist-kind was/is a real possibility
  • The TNA walked the extra-distance to make the new Constitution happen, first by backing the candidacy of Maithripala Sirisena

M. A. Sumanthiran, Mangala Samaraweera, Gotabhaya Rajapaksa and Sarath Fonseka
Going beyond or, ahead of what the religious-right Jathika Hela Uramaya (JHU) may have to say on the subject, the reported arrest of four ex-LTTErs for allegedly conspiring to target Tamil National Alliance (TNA) parliamentarian, M. A. Sumanthiran, needs to be squarely condemned. If it’s any indicative of any return to the old, forgotten ways, it needs to be pursued with the same vigour that made the military defeat of the dreaded terrorist organisation possible.

GROUP OF INGOS CALL EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT NOT TO RESTORE GSP+ TO SRI LANKA


Image: More than 100 garment factories had to closed down and thousands of women workers lost their jobs because of the suspension on GSP + concession.

Sri Lanka Brief10/02/2017

A group of International NGOs and individuals have called on the European Parliament to reject the EU Commission’s proposal to restore the GSP+ trade preference status to Sri Lanka.

They  urge members of the EU Parliament to review the factual basis of the EU Commission’s case for restoration of GSP+ and reject the proposal pending progress in the implementation of the respective recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and the UNCAT. We suggest, at a minimum, that no ratification decision proceed until the UNCAT has had the opportunity to review a further implementation report (due on 7 December 2017) that has been requested from the government of Sri Lanka as part of the Committee’s follow up recommendations at the 59th UNCAT session.

As an interim measure, they urge the members of the Committee on International Trade (INTA) to ensure that the deadline for ratification of the Commission’s proposal is extended from two to four months – thereby allowing full consideration of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights’ forthcoming report on Resolution 30/14 and maximising the leverage required to secure a robust follow up resolution at the upcoming UN Human Rights Council Session in March 2017.

Sri Lanka was suspended from the GSP + concessions in August 2010.

Of 69 Years- 57 Gobbled up by Politicians, their Acolytes, Cronies and Vandibattas! 

Corruption which was sweeping into the body politics unreservedly grabbed a fair portion of Independence; and continues to do so. Allegations of corruption, scandals and scams running into Billions that have been levelled against successive Governments in the past few decades far superseded the first 12 years, when Some Ministers were accused of accepting a bag of chilies or rice and other small gratifications, for which they had to pay the price.


2017-02-06
On February 4, 2017, we commemorated the 69th anniversary of the achievement of independence from colonialists. We are yet to see the signs of a prospective developing nation towards an independent, free and a sovereign society following 443-year foreign domination. Since the time of our first King Vijaya, this resplendent country, thrice-blessed by the Buddha, has a recorded history of more than 25 centuries, and a proud tradition. D S Senanayake, the first Prime Minister of Independent Sri Lanka, unfurled the Lion flag, the symbol of an ancient civilization, marking our freedom from the clutches of Colonial rule. The leadership in the path to independence, in the form of D.S. Senanayake, F.R. Senanayake, Sir D.B. Jayatilleke, Sir Ponnambalam Arunachalam, Sir Ponnamabalam Ramanathan, S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike, T.B. Jayah and D.R. Wijewardene were among many others worked together successfully with great insight and grace so as to achieve freedom.   

From Bags of Chilies to Billions: Achievement of the past Six Decades

The unprecedented happening in India as analysts point out; the Congress and the BJP are having a long and tacit understanding to suppress each other’s money-making tricks and private ‘businesses’— are those ‘deals’ that our media often cries about here, is a result of emulating the Indian model by our rulers and opponents? Bribery and corruption has become the order of the day.   
Very few would remember with gratitude the great men of the calibre of U.B. Wanninayake, M.D. Banda and Forester Obeysekera, the early UNP stalwarts. Then Finance Minister Wanninayake declined to give a certificate to his own son for his interview at the Central Bank. Mr. Banda refused to use State funds to get an electricity connection to his ancestral home unless the department agreed to provide electricity to the entire village; he was seen running about in his old car until his death. Mr. Obeysekera, rejected a plea to give a testimonial to the son of his closest supporter. He said it will be against his conscience to give a certificate to a person he had not known.   

Earliest Recorded Action Against corrupt Legislators 

 Governor Sir Andrew Caldecott appointed a Commission to investigate bribery among State Council members; Lawyer L M D de Silva, the one-man commissioner found eight members guilty of corrupt activity. While three of them were appointed by the Governor himself, the other elected men were, E W Abeygoonesekara [Nuwara-Eliya], A H Gunasekara [Balangoda], D D Gunasekara [Bandarawela], U Batuwantudawa [Kalutara] and E R Thambimuttu [Trinco-Batticaloa]. The first seven resigned immediately. Thambimuttu was removed by a motion moved by DS Senanayake, the Leader of the House. [L M D de Silva - KC, also served as a member in the Privy Council in Britain]   
 On September 11, 1959, a few days before his assassination, Prime Minister, SWRD Bandaranaike advised G.G. Ponnambalam to appoint the Thalgodapitiya Commission to inquire into allegations of bribery and corruption against his government’s parliamentarians, including some members of the Cabinet. The report tabled on Decenmber 16, 1960, found two of SWRD loyalists, D B Monnekulame and C A S Marikkar along with H Abeywickrema, M P de Zoysa, M S Kariyapper and R E Jayatillake guilty. Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike was lenient with the offenders. However, they were punished under the UNP-led National Government of Dudley Senanayake in 1965. Kariapper who was a MP then lost his seat and all six lost their civic rights for seven years. Monnekulama later told his constituents that he took small ‘santhosams’ for the work he did.   
 During the JR Presidency, Anura Daniel Deputy Minister was arrested at the Airport for smuggling gold bars and lost his seat. UNP nominated his sister to contest the same seat and Anura Daniel was the chief campaigner; Miss Daniel won with a huge majority over her SLFP rival. Voters sometimes do behave in a peculiar manner. The Bribery department was converted to a Commission to eradicate and inquire into Bribery and Corruption in the 1940s. During Sirimavo’s 1970-77 rule, there were allegations of SLFP Ministers taking bribes even as low as five hundred rupees, and most teacher appointments ‘interviews’ were held in Rest Houses.   

 There were serious allegations of corruption against most of the senior Ministers of J.R Jayewardene’s Cabinet. JR was like Rajapaksa; he did not oppose corruption. They both collected material on corrupt activities of their men and kept them safe in a give and take policy with a warning ‘do not rock the boat’. President Premadasa in 1989 smelt that some of his top men were conspiring against him. He hired former Police Commissioner A C Lawrence to investigate corrupt activities of the suspicious characters in his government.   
 When the Impeachment motion was moved against him in 1992, it contained very serious allegations of corruption. Premadasa supporters made equally strong allegations against Gamini Dissanayake and Lalith Athulathmudali, the architects of the Impeachment. The allegations referred to apple orchards in Australia, Swiss bank accounts, Airbus purchase, Argentine Ships [that never sailed] and Mahaweli Scams. However, the Motion failed as Speaker M H Mohamed switched loyalty at the final hour. [Mohamed was accused of accepting a huge santhosam from a big influential businessman in the city] Allegations against the two smart politicians, Lalith and Gamini were never proved.   

"The leadership in the path to independence, in the form of D.S. Senanayake, F.R. Senanayake, Sir D.B. Jayatilleke, Sir Ponnambalam Arunachalam, Sir Ponnamabalam Ramanathan, S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike, T.B. Jayah and D.R. Wijewardene were among many others worked together successfully with great insight and grace so as to achieve freedom. "


 During the Premadasa regime in 1989-1993, the State banks were ordered to release millions as loans to cronies without collateral. CBK’s election slogan “Dooshanaya and Beeshanaya cried foul of these alleged corruption. People saw a completely new face in CBK; she promised that politicians who engaged in corrupt activities would be brought to the Galle Face Green for public execution. At the end of her second term, they spoke of ‘deals’ involving her office in prime state lands, leading to punitive action against her by Courts soon after her retirement.   

People always wanted ‘a Change’: Pot Calling the Kettle Black

It was Theodore Roosevelt , who once commented, “When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer ‘Present’ or ‘Not Guilty’.” Clearly the people always wanted a change. The Bribery and Corruption Commission has not produced a single Member of Parliament or any government Minister in Court since 1960. The first and the last punitive action against politicians was in the first 12 years of post-independence Sri Lanka. May be that the Bribery Commissioners did not want to impartially investigate cases concerning the allegations of corruption of Parliamentarians. Those who make indictments against the men in power alleging corruption are the ones who were equally corrupt or more corrupt when they were in power; and with absolute power at their disposal, they would yield to such temptations. Today a good percentage of Politicians of both the big parties are corrupt to the core. The Government has got into dire financial straits due to the robbery and plunder of state property by the politicians, and their Cronies and Acolytes who have been ruling the country during the past few decades.   

 A Bribery  and Corruption Commission or a Special Presidential Commission cannot grapple with this problem. The people should fight politicians irrespective of their party loyalties to make them accountable.   Walter Thalgodapitiya Commission - 1959
 Bandaranaike,  unlike most leaders decided the time had come to act. He advised the Governor General to appoint a Commission and wanted even the members of the State Council and all the governments of the post independence, from 1943 up to September 11, 1959 investigated. Commissioners received a large number of anonymous petitions against politicians and members of their families. But there wasn’t a single petition against the left leaders. The report commented on the reluctance of the persons to come forward with information. “Reasons for the reluctance were fear of reprisals and the fact that persons who had given bribes were reluctant to come forward,”  it said.   
 As  per the report of the Commission which was tabled on the 16th of December 1960, one of the most Seniors Ministers was accused of accepting a bag of chilies and others with bags of rice and other commodities in return for small favours like jobs in the state sector. The position today is frightening. Corruption, theft and looting by politicians have achieved unprecedented proportions over the past 57 years, the hunger for wealth of powerful persons is astonishing. This situation needs to be arrested before the voiceless majority goes starving. We hear about extensive financial scandals running into Billions performed at high echelons while the political authority turns a blind-eye, or more surprisingly, aiding and abetting them, while the public are suffering under heavy economic conditions.   
 Thomas Love Peacock, the English novelist, poet, and official of the East India Company of 19th century once asked,   
“Is ours a government of the people, by the people, for the people, or a kakistocracy [his own coining for a state or country run by the worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous citizens] rather, for the benefit of knaves at the cost of fools?”

Power: Planning, Generation, Usage & Potential Savings In Sri Lanka

Colombo Telegraph

By Ratnam Nadarajah –February 10, 2017

Ratnam Nadarajah
“And God said, let there be light: and there was light.” ~ Genesis
In recent times power or more to the point lack power to meet peak demand has been a real issue for all concerned. There is a possibility to declare emergency and deployment of armed forces to deal with ongoing effects of drought and power outages.
In a developing country, such as Sri Lanka, power system planning faces enormous challenges and problems as, for example, future load growth in the face of uncertainties, the constraints imposed on investment, the type and availability of fuel for the generating units, the need for consolidating the dispersed electric producers, the isolated regions as a prerequisite for future interconnecting these regions via local and national grids. Also, how an optimal reliability level can be achieved that will guarantee a continuous power flow with at reasonable costs.
Planning for power systems is essentially a projection of how the system should grow over a specific period, given certain assumptions and judgment about the future loads and the size of investment in generating capacity additions and transmission facilities expansion and reinforcements.
Any plan can become technically and economically obsolete over a period. New inventions in electrical utilisation equipment or unforeseen industrial, commercial, or residential projects can change load forecast. Breakthroughs in new generation and transmission technologies, unexpected inflation in equipment or labour costs or change of national income can all mean that system plans may take another direction.
In developing countries, power system planning has become more difficult, but more important to provide the necessary information to enable decision to be made today about many years in the future.
Reliability and uninterrupted generation is one of the most important criteria which must be taken into consideration during all phases of power system planning, design build and operation.
One capacity related reliability index, known as the loss of load expectation (LOLE) method, is presently considered as the most common adopted probabilistic index in system generation expansion planning. This method computes the expected number of days per year on which the available generating capacity is not sufficient to meet all the period of peak load levels.
Broadly, Sri Lanka needs power for domestic use, commercial use and for industrial purposes. Over the years, the domestic consumption has gone up with more appliances consuming more and wider availability of electricity to the far corners of the island. Commercial sector too has grown considerably with big shopping malls and multi-story office spaces with increased air conditioners and computers and support items.
On the industrial scene, too power requirement has gone up considerably with the opening of manufacturing units and other infrastructure developments. With the planned mega projects, such the Port City development-work in progress(Wip), Mega polis, Hambantota Industrial Zone, and many others in the pipeline scale of power requirement far exceeds the current available capacity many folds.
Do our planners have a master plan for power requirement, in the short, medium, and long term? From my perspective and observation, I would safely say there is no such plan(s), comprehensive or otherwise.
Let us consider the power generation in Sri Lanka
Total Electricity Generation Mix- First Half of 2014
CEB Hydro     ——-       18.55 %
CEB Thermal-Oil—-         18.52%
CEB Thermal-Coal—-     23.95%
IPP Thermal————     32.53%
(independent power producers)
Renewable————–     6.45%
(Source: Power Utility Commission of Sri Lanka)
The overall power generating capacity is much higher. For instance, the Hydro power installed capacity was 37%. It means that only 50% of installed Hydro power capacity has produced electricity. Put it simply although the power generating capacity is high at 37% but the actual production is only half of the capacity. This is due to various reasons, the main one being the water levels in the reservoirs being low due to natural causes vis se vis insufficient of rain leading to drought.

Read More