Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Sunday, February 5, 2017

Funny Things In Thomas More’s Utopia: Part VIII


Colombo Telegraph
By Laksiri Fernando –February 5, 2017 
Dr. Laksiri Fernando
Thomas More used lot of pun and humor in his ‘Utopia.’ He obviously didn’t derive it from Lanka. It was personal to the writer. We Sri Lankans are mostly dull people without much humor, with very few exceptions. One exception in our legendary history is Andare, the court jester. More’s pun and humor, however, always had critical social realism.
A most hilarious Utopian custom that he relates is like the social (sexual) experiment that the SBS TV Australia is now broadcasting named ‘Undressed.’
Without much introduction, we here publish chapter six of Laksiri Fernando’s ‘Thomas More’s Socialist Utopia and Ceylon (Sri Lanka)’ with its publication link as https://www.createspace.com/4688110 The purpose is to make the whole book available free of charge courtesy of Colombo Telegraph and Sri Lanka Guardian. This is a short, but an exceptional chapter, in contrast to others. It talks about More’s writing style as well.
 FUNNY THINGS
“There never was a man more ready to laugh – especially at his own expense – than Thomas More.” – Mario M Cuomo[1]
MANY commentators have agreed that Thomas More kept us wondering whether he was serious or joking in many instances. He had a deep sense of humor and within that humor he was making a social critique of social reality. Even some of his phrases and expressions were quite sharp and telling.
Both More and his friend, Erasmus, seemed to be blessed with enormous sense of humor. When they first met in London in 1499, Erasmus exclaimed “you must be More or no more.” To which More replied, “either you are Erasmus or the devil.” They used to take great pleasure in playing with words and their meanings, most of the time upside down. Again, when Erasmus was going to London on horseback from Rotterdam in 1509, he conceived the idea to write what became his masterpiece, The Praise of Folly. He later related how he came to the idea of ‘Folly’ recollecting the similarity of More’s name to the Greek word of folly, and that is Moria. He in fact dedicated the book to More or ‘Moria.’ Erasmus often called Thomas More, ‘Moria’ as fun. The relevance of Erasmus’ humor to this exposition is that many reviewers believe that Erasmus was closely behind More’s Utopia not only as an editor but also as a partial author.      
As we know, More wrote Utopia in Latin. When it was translated into English some sentences ran into long paragraphs and therefore the cohesion of argument or expression sometimes got lost. Nevertheless of that weakness, his humor remained fairly intact. What he said often created imagery. One could picture what he was saying. At the very beginning of his story when he was reporting that he went to Antwerp with Cuthbert Tonstal, a friend and a senior, he said that if he tries to testify for him it would be like “showing the sun with a lantern.” Of course, it is proverb of that time but the way he stated it was simply amusing.
Once he was explaining how the Utopians were breeding chicken. It was not the natural system allowing the hens to hatch the eggs, but it is the incubation system like in big hatcheries today. He said, a “vast numbers of eggs are laid in a gentle and equal heat, in order to be hatched, and they are no sooner out of the shell, and able to stir about, but they seem to consider those that feed them as their mothers, and follow them as other chickens do the hen that hatched them.” What comes to mind is the way the small chicks running behind their feeders.
The funniest thing of all perhaps was the marriage custom that More attributed to the Utopians and the way that custom was described. This can be considered a social experiment on sexuality and in choosing the most (physically and sexually) suitable partners.[2] “In choosing their wives they use a method that would appear to us very absurd and ridiculous,” he said. “Before marriage some grave matron presents the bride naked, whether she is a virgin or a widow, to the bridegroom; and after that some grave man presents the bridegroom naked to the bride.”
Then he argued that ‘if we are to buy a horse even for small value, we are so cautious and see every part of him to make sure ‘that there may be no secret hid under any of them.’ This may be little insulting to women since he was alluding the necessity only in taking a woman as a wife, although the attributed Utopian custom is for both sexes. In the European custom those days, he said, “a man should venture upon trust, and only see about a hand’s-breadth of the face, all the rest of the body being covered, under which there may lie hid what may be contagious as well as loathsome.”[3]
More repeatedly expressed sarcastic comments about human indulgence in gold and silver. Only the Utopians were different, “They eat and drink out of vessels of earth, or glass, which make an agreeable appearance though formed of brittle materials: while they make their chamber-pots and close-stools of gold and silver.” What a way to ridicule the habit of indulgence in gold and silver?
There is reason to believe that even this was not just More’s imagination but something he picked up from his knowledge about Ceylon or India. When Karl Marx was writing about India, in the mid eighteenth century, he mentioned about trade between Europe and this part of the world and said, “From immemorial times, Europe received the admirable textures of Indian labor, sending in return for them her precious metals.” But for the Asians there was no much value in these precious metals. Marx said:
“Even the lowest class, those who go about nearly naked, have commonly a pair of golden ear-rings and a gold ornament of some kind hung round their necks. Rings on the fingers and toes have also been common. Women as well as children frequently wore massive bracelets and anklets of gold or silver.”[4]
It was very much similar to what More said about the Utopians.
“Of the same metals, they likewise make chains and fetters for their slaves; to some of which, as a badge of infamy, they hang an ear- ring of gold, and make others wear a chain or coronet of the same metal.”
But to More, these were ‘badges of infamy’ with a particular purpose and that is “to render gold and silver of no esteem.” He went on saying that the Utopians ‘found pearls on their coast and precious stones on their rocks’ but only children adorned them. “But when they grow to years, and see that none but children use such baubles, they of their own accord, without being bid by their parents, lay them aside.”

Australia: Army chief to meet with Indonesian military leaders following row


Indonesian National Army at Tanjung Priok, North Jakarta. The military have suspended cooperation with Australia. Source: ardiwebs/Shutterstock.com
5th February 2017
FOLLOWING the suspension of the defence cooperation between Indonesia and Australia, Australia’s army chief Angus Campbell is due to meet Indonesian military (TNI) chief, Gatot Nurmantyo and army chief of staff Mulyono, TNI spokesman Wuryanto said discuss the investigation into the row.
Indonesia announced the suspension after “offensive” material was seen at an Australian base, which reportedly insulted Indonesia’s founding principles of ‘Pancasila’, which includes belief in God, the unity of Indonesia, social justice, and democracy.
“All forms of cooperation have been suspended,” Indonesian military spokesman Major General Wuryanto said. “There are technical matters that need to be discussed.” However, he added that it is “highly likely” cooperation would resume once the issues have been resolved.
Campbell will be discussing the findings of an investigation by the defence department. Both governments moved quickly to try to cool tensions and Indonesia’s chief security minister, Wiranto, later said only cooperation related to the military’s Australia-based language training programme had been suspended.
Australian Defence Minister Marise Payne said at the time: “We have indicated our regret that this occurred and that offence was taken. I think that’s appropriate when a significant counterpart raises their concerns with you.”
Indonesian President Joko Widodo reassured his neighbours, saying relations “remain in good condition”, and clarifications were necessary so that the situation would not escalate.
Indonesia and Australia are allies in the region and are highly valuable in policing border control and counter terrorism in both nations.
The countries have extensive military cooperation, which ranges from counter-terrorism cooperation to border protection.
But they have had a rocky military relationship in recent years. Australia stopped joint training exercises with Indonesian special forces (Kopassus) after accusations of abuses by the unit in East Timor in 1999 as the territory prepared for independence.
Ties resumed when counter-terrorism cooperation became imperative after the 2002 nightclub bombings on the resort island of Bali that killed 202 people, including 88 Australians.
Indonesia most recently suspended military ties in 2013 over revelations that Australian spies had tapped the mobile telephone of then president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono
Additional reporting by Reuters

Save Indian-Held Kashmir

The story does not stop at the brutal killing of Burhan Wani; there are countless other incidents in which the Indian security forces play a callous game with the lives and honour of the people of Kashmir. Their own streets, their own homes have become the most grievous threat for them. They, particularly the young girls, are nowhere safe and secure.


by Ali Sukhanver-
( February 5, 2017, Islamabad, Sri Lanka Guardian) The enigmatic dreamlike valley of the Indian held Kashmir had never experienced such a horrific and terrible situation regarding human rights violation as it experienced throughout 2016. The cruelest act of 2016 was the brutal murder of the young Kashmiri leader Burhan Wani. His activities on social media made him the most popular leader among the Kashmiris. He was a very staunch supporter of throwing India out of the Kashmir valley. The Indian security forces killed him in a so-called encounter on 8 July 2016. After his murder, there started an uncontrollable series of protest in which more than 85 people died and more than 13,000 civilians were seriously injured. The government had to impose a continuous curfew for 53 consecutive days to crush the protest but it simply proved a futile activity. The peaceful protest converted into violence against the security forces and as a result of it more than 4,000 security personnel were injured. Analysts on Kashmir issue are of the opinion that death of Burhan Wani gave birth to the worst unrest in the region since 2010.
The story does not stop at the brutal killing of Burhan Wani; there are countless other incidents in which the Indian security forces play a callous game with the lives and honour of the people of Kashmir. Their own streets, their own homes have become the most grievous threat for them. They, particularly the young girls, are nowhere safe and secure. The beautiful valley of Kashmir would never forget the after-noon of this April 12, when a 16 year old school-girl was molested by an Indian army officer while going to a toilet next to her school. A bunker of the 21 Rashtriya Rifles was intentionally placed very close to that public toilet in the center of the street. The desperate screams of the minor girl alerted people in the surrounding market and very soon, an infuriated crowd of unarmed locals gathered there. The crowd protested the molestation of the minor girl and demanded the arrest of the army man. However, the troops in the bunker started indiscriminate firing, killing two young men and a woman and injuring at least two dozen other innocent civilians. Indian security forces have ever been using rape as a weapon against the helpless Kashmiris. They are raping the Kashmiri women in the same way as they did twenty-five years back in 1991. The people of Kashmir still remember that horrible night when Indian army soldiers raped more than 100 women in Kashmir’s Kunan and Poshpora villages during a search operation. It seems that Indian security forces want to push out the real owners of the Kashmir valley. They have left not even a single moment without fear. No peace, no security; every morning a new saga of miseries, every night a new tale of suppressions. The Indian held Kashmir has simply turned into a land of death and harassment. The world peace-makers and the so called international peace-fighters are always dumb and silent at the continuous human rights violations going on in this charismatic valley of Indian held Kashmir. The people of the Indian held Kashmir sometimes feel that they are not human beings but lifeless objects; and more unfortunate fact is that except Pakistan there is no one else to listen to their cries of pain and agony. What would be the end-state of all this brutality and cruelty; no one knows.
London based Indian writer Mirza Waheed very vehemently exposed the real face of the Indian atrocities in Kashmir in his article ‘India is blinding young Kashmiri protesters’. The article was published on 18th July 2016. He says, “Two sets of images have haunted me these last few days. One is a series of photos of people splashing bucket-loads of water to wash away blood from the streets of Kashmir, where Indian forces have shot dead at least 45 people since 9 July. The other set of images is that of scores of young men with bandages on their eyes, before or after undergoing surgery to remove tiny steel pellets from their retinas. Indian forces deployed in Kashmir now routinely use pellet guns to stymie roadside demonstrations.” India is continuously trying to negate the fact that Kashmir belongs to the people of Kashmir; the Kashmiris are a nation, having an individual identity, a separate culture and independent traditional values; and they could never be treated like animals. They are looking to the world around them in search of someone who could save them from the horrible, miserable blazing inferno of human rights violation.

François Fillon sinks in polls after ‘Penelopegate’ scandal

French presidential candidate’s chances decline after allegations family members were paid for fake jobs
 François Fillon, right, insisted on TV that his wife Penelope, left, had a ‘real’ and ‘legal’ job. Photograph: Eric Feferberg/AFP/Getty Images

 and agencies-Saturday 4 February 2017

French presidential candidate François Fillon is fighting for his political future as polls show he is likely to be eliminated in the first-round vote by former economy minister Emmanuel Macron.

Fillon, a one-time prime minister who is representing the centre-right, was favourite to become France’s next leader but has seen his chances sink after a scandal over alleged fake jobs for members of his family.
Police continued to investigate allegations that Fillon’s Welsh-born wife, Penelope, and two of his five children were paid €900,000 of public money for work they did not do. Fillon has insisted he will continue his campaign and ask supporters to hold firm until the investigation is finished.

On Friday, Fillon accused “shadowy” forces of seeking to crush him, in what has become known as Penelopegate. “I will hold firm, faced with those in the shadows who are trying to attack me,” he said in a video message to supporters. However, he admitted: “I understand that the accusations are troubling to certain among you because they are pounding … and because of the sums involved.”

Polls suggest Marine Le Pen could now win the first round presidential vote. Photograph: Eric Piermont/AFP/Getty Images

The latest polls suggested that support for Fillon had plummeted in the wake of the allegations.

Pollsters Ifop and BVA both suggest Fillon could be knocked out of the first-round presidential vote in April, with between 18.5% and 20% of support, compared with 25% for the far-right Front National leader Marine Le Pen and 20%-22% for Macron. Benoît Hamon, a surprise choice for the Socialist party candidate, polled 16.5%, and far-left candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon got 10%. The polls have Macron winning the second round, with about 63% against Le Pen’s 37%.

Earlier last week, another poll suggested Le Pen could win the first round with as much as 27%, with Macron in second place with 23%, but that Macron would still win the second round.

Fillon, standing on a conservative and Catholic programme, has faced pressure even from within his own Les Républicains party since the Penelopegate allegations were first revealed in the satirical newspaper Le Canard Enchaîné, and later by the France2 investigations programme, Envoyé Spécial.

A preliminary inquiry into alleged fraud is attempting to establish whether Penelope Fillon worked as a parliamentary assistant. Police searched offices and archives at the National Assembly last week and demanded documents from the Senate, the upper house where Fillon was said to have employed his two eldest children, Marie and Charles.

Fillon went on television to insist his wife’s job was “real” and “legal”. Last week the couple were questioned separately for several hours by anti-fraud police.

In 2007, I interviewed Penelope Fillon for the Sunday Telegraph. In a video of that interview she can be heard telling me she did “bits and pieces” for her husband, including handing out leaflets and accompanying him on the election trail. But she added: “I have never actually been his assistant or anything like that.”

Envoyé Special was watched by a record 5.4 million viewers when it aired the 10-year-old video on Thursday evening. On his Facebook account, Fillon said the accusations against him were “pure calumny”.

Le Pen is also under investigation for misusing almost €300,000 from European parliament funds to pay the salaries of FN staff, including a personal bodyguard. She has been ordered to repay the money, but is refusing to do so.

On Saturday, Macron launched an attack on Le Pen, saying she was betraying France’s ideals, as the two frontrunners held rallies in the city of Lyon for a weekend of campaigning. On the other side of town, Le Pen was kicking off her own campaign, with pledges to take France out of the eurozone, hold a referendum on EU membership and impose taxes on the job contracts of foreigners.

Opinion polls suggest Macron could easily beat Le Pen in the second round, but faith in pollsters has been shaken after they failed to predict the election of Donald Trump, the US president, or Britain’s vote to leave the European Union last June.

Macron mocked Le Pen’s campaign slogan, “in the name of the people”. “Some today pretend to be talking in the name of the people, but they are just ventriloquists,” he told a crowd of about 8,000 people. “They don’t speak in the name of the people – they speak in the name of their bitterness, they speak for themselves, from father to daughter and daughter to niece,” he said, referring to Le Pen’s father Jean-Marie and niece Marion.

The 39-year-old said Le Pen’s anti-euro, anti-immigrant National Front party would be unfaithful to the French motto of “liberty, equality, fraternity”. “They betray liberty by shrinking our horizons, they betray equality by stating that some are more equal than others, they betray fraternity because they hate the faces that don’t look like theirs,” he said.

Le Pen’s speech envisioned a thriving nation “made in France”, whose citizens would be first in line for state services, and a state unshackled by the “rules-laden” European Union. Immigration, especially by Muslims, would be contained, she said. The French would also guard their own borders, spend francs instead of euros and defend themselves after pulling out of Nato’s integrated command.

Romania protesters await corruption decree repeal


Protesters rally in front of the government headquarters in Bucharest, Romania. Photo: 4 February 2017EPAImage caption--Protesters have been holding mass rallies for nearly a week
BBC
5 February 2017
Romania's government is to hold an urgent meeting to scrap a decree that would have shielded many politicians from prosecution for corruption.
The decree triggered the largest street protests in the country since the fall of communism in 1989.
Bowing to pressure, PM Sorin Grindeanu said on Sunday: "I do not want to divide Romania."
Tens of thousands of protesters in Bucharest cheered the move, but vowed to keep the pressure on the cabinet.
They said they would continue their rallies until the decree - which was passed on Tuesday and was due to come into effect on 10 February - was actually repealed.
Some protesters are still demanding the resignation of the entire government.

EU warning

Mr Grindeanu, from the leftist Social Democratic Party (PSD), said he "heard and saw many opinions", including from "the voice of the street".
He said that parliament would now debate a new corruption law.
Justice Minister Florin Iordache would take responsibility for the poor communication and confusion around the controversial measure, he added.
The decree would have decriminalised abuse of power offences where sums of less than €44,000 (£38,000; $47,500) were involved.
One immediate beneficiary would have been Liviu Dragnea, who leads the PSD and faces charges of defrauding the state of €24,000.
Romanian Prime Minister Sorin Grindeanu announces that the government will cancel the controversial decree. Photo: 4 February 2017AFPImage caption--Prime Minister Grindeanu made the announcement in a televised statement
The government had earlier argued that the changes were needed to reduce prison overcrowding and align certain laws with the constitution.
But critics saw it as a way for the PSD to absolve officials convicted or accused of corruption.
The EU had warned Romania against undoing its progress against corruption.
The leftist government only returned to power in December after protests forced its last leader to step down in October 2015.

Palestinian Israelis and Jews protest house demolitions


Leading march were opposition lawmakers from left-wing Meretz party and from Joint List, coalition of mainly Palestinian Israeli parties

Palestinian Israelis and Jews demonstrate on Saturday night against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's home demolition policy, in Tel Aviv (AFP)

AFP-Saturday 4 February 2017

Palestinian Israelis and Jews marched arm-in-arm through central Tel Aviv on Saturday night, calling for the government to stop demolishing Arab homes built without permits that it rarely grants.
An AFP journalist said that about 1,000 protesters took part, many carrying banners in Hebrew and Arabic, reading "Jews and Arabs together". Others said the number was higher.
Leading the march were opposition lawmakers from the left-wing Meretz party and from the Joint List, a coalition of mainly Palestinian Israeli parties.
Palestinian Israelis say that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing government has cracked down on their unlicensed construction to try to placate Jewish settlers angry at a demolition order against the Amona wildcat outpost in the occupied West Bank.
Tensions flared last month when police flooded the Arab village of Umm al-Heiran in southern Israel to supervise demolitions, and a policeman and his Arab alleged attacker were killed in disputed circumstances.
Police said that villager Yacoub Abu al-Qiyan, 50, was shot dead after he rammed officers with his vehicle, killing one of them.
They alleged he was active in the Israeli Islamic Movement and may have been influenced by the Islamic State group - a claim residents strongly denied, calling him a respected teacher.
"Members of our government are proud to establish alternative facts," Meretz MP Michal Rozin told the demonstrators on Saturday.
"They do this not from ignorance," she added. "They are building a narrative of fear, racism and hatred of the other in a deliberate and sinister fashion which serves their political ends."
In a December video address, Netanyahu linked the order to dismantle the Amona outpost with a fresh offensive on unapproved Arab construction in Israel.
"The law must be equitable; the same law which obliges vacating Amona also obliges removing illegal construction in other parts of our country," he said.
"Therefore I have given orders to speed up demolition of illegal construction... in all parts of the country and we shall do that in the coming days."
Amona residents and their supporters were cleared from their West Bank hilltop on Thursday, and their homes are expected to be taken down during the coming week.
Palestinian Israelis make up almost 18 percent of the population, and say the state systematically discriminates against them.
They say the Jewish state makes it impossible for them to obtain planning permission to expand their communities.
The result is that many resort to building homes without permits, leaving them liable to demolition.

Trump Sounds Like Obama on Israeli Settlements

Trump Sounds Like Obama on Israeli Settlements

No automatic alt text available.BY DANIEL SHAPIRO-FEBRUARY 3, 2017

It was too good to last.

For weeks following President Donald Trump’s surprise election triumph, advocates for the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank were hailing the dawn of a new age. Some bandied about proposals for annexation of portions of the West Bank. Others heralded the end of the era of the two-state solution.
Many asserted that the new administration would desist from criticizing Israeli settlement activity, as the Obama administration was wont to do. In the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, legislation advanced that would legalize dozens of outposts built illegally on private Palestinian property — a partial compensation for the court-ordered evacuation of one such outpost, Amona.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu struggled to contain the enthusiasm of these voices. He urged them to tone down the celebrating, give the new administration time to establish its policies, and above all, allow him to travel to Washington for his first meeting with the new president without undercutting his ability to reach a common understanding. He felt certain that he and his new counterpart, given time and space, would reach arrangements that most settlement advocates would find satisfactory.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the inauguration. A Trump team that was willing to speak out, at times off-the-cuff and with outrageous results, on a wide range of foreign policy issues, went noticeably silent on issues surrounding Israelis and Palestinians. (One notable exception was the president-elect’s call for a veto of the U.N. Security Council Resolution 2334 criticizing Israeli settlements, which the Obama administration abstained on, allowing it to pass.)

In Israel, more questions began to come up about the Trump administration’s approach. Would Rex Tillerson, a secretary of state from the energy industry with deep ties to Arab governments and no record on Israel, sign on to a policy that put a two-state solution on ice? How about James Mattis, a secretary of defense who had served as commander of U.S. Central Command, and who had spoken publicly about the way the festering Israeli-Palestinian conflict affects U.S. standing in the Arab world?

Eyebrows rose as well when the president tapped his son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, as a point person on working toward Middle East peace, or “the ultimate deal,” as Trump called it. Uncertainty became the only certainty, even as settler representatives decamped to Washington to take part in the inauguration festivities.

In the first two weeks of the Trump administration, White House spokespeople had little to say on Israeli-Palestinian matters. Despite two settlement announcements, totaling some 5,500 housing units, the administration delivered no condemnations, no calls for restraint, and only quiet references to future conversations between Trump and Netanyahu.

A reasonable supposition took hold — that Netanyahu, under pressure from settler leaders as the long-delayed evacuation of Amona finally took place — had authorized these announcements, which focused on building inside settlement blocs, after prior coordination with Trump. That could explain the administration’s laconic response.

And then came Thursday: Boom! The Jerusalem Post‘s Michael Wilner reported that the White House wanted Israel to cease settlement announcements that are “unilateral” and “undermining” of Trump’s effort to forge Middle East peace. A senior administration official told the Post that the White House was not consulted on the recent settlement announcements.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer went on to describe the “unchanged” U.S. desire for peace between Israelis and Palestinians. While the existence of settlements may not be an impediment to peace, he said, “the construction of new settlements or the expansion of existing settlements beyond their current borders may not be helpful in achieving that goal.”

What does this one small episode, so early in the Trump administration, tell us? It does not tell us whether, or how hard, or how successfully, the administration will work to advance peace talks or a two-state solution, although it suggests that the White House cares. It does tell us, however, that the 50-year U.S. opposition to Israeli settlement expansion, as a negative factor in the search for peace, is a widely understood American interest that does not fluctuate wildly from one administration to the next.

But wait. In the hall of mirrors that is Middle East peacemaking, this seeming rebuke of Israel may, in fact, have been coordinated with Netanyahu after all. Time will tell, but there is strong reason to believe that Netanyahu, having lost the pressure from Obama as his excuse to restrain the most right-leaning members of his coalition, whose annexation dreams he knows will be harmful to Israel’s interests, actually needed the very same from Trump. Thursday’s announcement may have been exactly what Netanyahu asked for.

The prospect of Israel ceasing to be both a Jewish and a democratic state, the risk of instability that could threaten Jordan if Palestinians despair of any chance at statehood (note that King Abdullah met with Trump on Thursday), the complications a shutdown in efforts to achieve a two-state solution would cause in U.S. relations with Arab states — these are only some of the reasons that the Trump administration, after only two weeks, has landed in roughly the same place as each of its predecessors on Israeli-Palestinian issues.

The goal of achieving a negotiated two-state solution to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the opposition to unilateral acts that could impede it, were not some hobbyhorses of the Obama administration. They are deeply rooted American interests that have shaped — and, it appears, will continue to shape — U.S. policy. In this case, maybe in close coordination with Israel.
President Trump, welcome to the Middle East peace funhouse.

Photo credit: THOMAS COEX/AFP/Getty Images

Muslims Need Not Apply


President Trump is doing precisely what he promised voters, something very rare in politics. One of the last presidents to do so was Democrat James K. Polk in the mid-1800’s who stormed into office on the promise of conquering northern Mexico, lowering tariffs, and bluffing the British out of Oregon.


by Eric S. Margolis-
( February 5, 2017, New York City, Sri Lanka Guardian) When I was suffering through advanced infantry training in the US Army many, many moons ago, I learned the Trump negotiating system.
Our dreaded first sergeant, Delmar Creech, would terrorize us, inflict push-ups or latrine detail, and then restrict us to barracks over weekends for some minor infraction.
We hated him with a passion. But then one Friday he strode into the barracks and, with a big smile, said ‘you boys have been good. I’m granting you PX privileges!’
A cheer erupted. We were being allowed to go to the base store to buy candy, cigarettes and magazines. Suddenly, everyone said, `Sarge ain’t such a bad guy after all.’
This is the secret to Donald Trump’s negotiating tactics: a storm of invective and abuse, followed by some minor concessions. `Trump ain’t such a bad guy after all.’
We just witnessed this technique used on our old ally, Australia, where Trump threw a telephone tantrum over the prospect of a modest number of mainly South Asian Muslim refugees held on Australia’s Devil’s Island entering the US.
This nasty little spat came on the heels of last week’s refusal by Trump to accept Mideast refugees from seven nations, supposedly to keep America safe. However, there has not been a single attack against the US from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria or Yemen – even though all have been bombed (26,171 times) or had their governments overthrown by the US and its allies.
President Trump is doing precisely what he promised voters, something very rare in politics. One of the last presidents to do so was Democrat James K. Polk in the mid-1800’s who stormed into office on the promise of conquering northern Mexico, lowering tariffs, and bluffing the British out of Oregon.
Polk accomplished all of his goals, then refused to run for a second term so he would not be compelled to make political compromises. He died in 1849. His legacy was the new American states of California, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and other western regions.
This writer had hoped that when Trump felt the full weight of office he would make good on his vow to press for a real Palestinian-Israeli peace agreement. Instead, Trump welcomed Israeli PM Benyamin Netanyahu, packed his cabinet with rabid Muslim-haters, neo-cons and far right zanies and has just about proclaimed a new crusade against Islam.
Was all this real or a political ploy? We must remember that nearly half of all Republican voters – Trump’s base – describe themselves as practicing born-again Christians. The Christian fundamentalist right played a key role in George Bush’s two victories. Some 78% of born-again Christians voted for Bush.
These religious right voters come from the Bible Belt South and Midwest, a vast expanse routinely ignored by East and West coast pundits and political operatives. The Trump campaign was extremely clever in analyzing this political geography and focusing efforts on the evangelical empty spaces between New York and Los Angeles – the same region that brought Prohibition in 1919 and Trump in 2016.
One of the key tenets of Republican theological voters is the hatred of Islam as the ‘new’ Communism and the fear that Islam’s growth is far outpacing Christianity.
Few of these confused Republican core voters have any sense of geography or history. After the 9/11 attacks, surveys showed that 78% or more were convinced that Iraq’s Saddam Hussein was behind the attacks. This was a glaring example of what expert Kevin Phillips terms `the American Disenlightenment.’
President Trump benefitted from this accrued ignorance in his startling electoral victory. East and West coast media were astounded because they had never attended a Pentecostal Church or listened to the poisonous sermons of ‘Rev’ John Hagee or so-called Christian radio from whose bizarre ravings many Christian fundamentalists receive all their news.
I witnessed the birth of the strange alliance between America’s Christian far right and Israel in the early 1980’s during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon. Two radio stations from the Bible Belt USA rushed in to begin broadcasting their fundamentalist creed to Lebanon and Syria.
We laughed at these Christian broadcasters but the Israelis were smart enough to understand how their new born-again fundamentalist allies could be used as the first step to win over the America’s Christian far right. The fundamentalists believe that Biblical Israel must be re-created (never mind Syria, Lebanon and Palestine) before Christ can return.
Armageddon, the ultimate battle between good and evil, would ensue, bringing destruction of the Earth. Born-agains will zip up to heaven while the rest of us slowly burn in hellfire.
Three decades later, Christian Conservatives are one of America’s leading political forces. President Trump just called for the ban on churches preaching politics and fundraising be lifted.
Let’s hope Trump uses some of his great energy to arm twist Israelis and Palestinians into a decent peace deal. This, alas, seem unlikely.
Copyright Eric S. Margolis February 2017