Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, January 21, 2017

Uma Oya people’s struggle ends in victory

uma3

January 21, 2017

Members of about 15 families who have lost their houses due to Uma Oya project engaged in a protest campaign occupying the Divisional Secretariat on the 19th which prompted the Divisional Secretary and authorities to have a discussion with the JVP Member for Uva Provincial Council Samantha Vidyarathna.

The discussion went on until about 6.30 p.m. and the authorities agreed to grant all demands of the protestors.

Accordingly, 4 government houses would be given to the families who have lost their houses and to pay Rs.15,000 monthly for those who prefer to live in rented out houses.

They engaged in a protest campaign demanding alternate houses for the ones they lost for the project and threatened to live in the Divisional Secretariat if they did not get proper abodes to live in.

However, they terminated their campaign as their issue was solved amicably.

uma1
uma2
uma4
uma6

Arjuna expels president of Ports trade union appointed by president Maithripala


LEN logo



(Lanka-e-News -21.Jan.2017, 11.30PM)  President  of SLFP trade union (Sri Lanka freedom workers association) , Prasanna Kalutarage of the Ports Authority  has been expelled illegally by minister Arjuna Ranatunge .Kalutarage had opposed the havoc that is being wreaked on the Port by the minister and his elder brother (chairman of the Port) .
This unlawful decision was made unilaterally based on an accusation  made by  Priyath Bandu Wickrema, a Rajapakse stooge  as far back as 2011 when he was the chairman of the Port against Kalutarage  during the nefarious decade of  the Rajapakse  regime .

Priyath Bandu who was  most leading among the  henchman of the Rajapakses took action then against Kalutarage because the latter was antagonistic to the Rajapakses. Today , Arjuna and his younger brother are also most obnoxiously  following in the footsteps of the ex chairman , a  bootlicker of Rajapakses .
According to the Ports regulations , any charges mounted against an employee shall be investigated within three months. It cannot be investigated for 6 years.  Moreover , charges can be leveled   against a Ports employee only by the head of the division where that employee is working , and not by the chairman.
Minister Arjuna and his elder brother , the chairman of Ports have expelled trade union leader Prasanna Kalutarage grossly violating all the laws,  rules and regulations aforementioned.
Prasanna Kalutharage was appointed as the president of the SL freedom employees’ association by the incumbent president Maithripala Sirisena.It was only the Ports  Sri Lanka Freedom  trade union and its leader Kalutharage , and  a few other leaders that extended support to Maithripala when he was contesting the presidential elections .
By now Arjuna based on various grounds has eliminated all those leaders. Finally he chased away Kalutharage on the 19 th amidst a storm of controversy. 
Port employees say ,  minister Arjuna is hostile to the president because the former  is   now directly and secretly working for the joint opposition along with those politicos ,and  his brother who is with them .
---------------------------
by     (2017-01-21 21:35:08)

Rs. 15,150 million loss from rice imports!

Rs. 15,150 million loss from rice imports!

Jan 21, 2017

Non-compliance to accepted procedures has caused the government and the CWE to lose Rs. 15,157,031,018 from the importation of rice in 2014 and 2015, an investigation by the auditor general’s department has revealed. On a request made by the COPE on 20 September 2016, the AG prepared a report into the CWE’s rice imports in the two years.

The CWE had spent Rs. 27,010 million to import the rice, but its earning through the sale of the same amounted to only Rs. 11,850 million, it says. The local rice production exceeded consumption in 2012, 2013 and 2015, but rice was imported too, the report has observed.
In 2014 and 2015, the CWE had disregarded the procurement guidelines when making the rice importations. Also, no proper agreement has been reached for these purchases. By November 16 last year, rice containers are being kept unused, without adhering to the due standards, at the port and at private container-yards. The AG’s report concludes that rice has been imported without giving consideration to its impact on the local agriculture, and recommends that the responsible officials be identified.

Video: “They came to conquer”

20 January 2017

“It’s not a state, or a government or forces that came to enforce the law. They came to conquer.”
That is how resident Raed Abu al-Qiyan described an Israeli police raid on his village, Umm al-Hiran, in the south of present-day Israel on 18 January.
The police were there to carry out demolition orders against 15 homes in the Palestinian Bedouin village, which the Israeli government aims to evacuate in order to establish a Jewish settlement in its place.

Two killed

A resident of the village and a police officer were killed during the raid.
Israeli police asserted that the resident, Yaqoub Abu al-Qiyan, 50, deliberately ran over and killed the officer, 37-year-old Erez Levi.
Video from the scene, including police aerial surveillance footage leaked to Israeli media, and eyewitness testimony challenge this claim.
An analysis by the UK-based research group Forensic Architecture indicates that Abu al-Qiyan was driving slowly and his vehicle only accelerated after he was shot at by police, suggesting he lost control of his car.
In one of the recordings, a single gunshot can be heard after Abu al-Qiyan’s car comes to a stop.
“This last shot is consistent with what the Israeli security personnel calls ‘verification of killing’ – the shooting to kill of already neutralized people,” according to Forensic Architecture.

Injuries

Several others were injured during the raid, including Ayman Odeh, a Palestinian member of Israel’s parliament, the Knesset.
The deadly demolition raid in Umm al-Hiran comes a week after police destroyed 11 homes in Qalansawa, another Palestinian community in Israel.
The Israeli government has plans to demolish thousands more Palestinian homes in the country.
Video and editing by Keren Manor/Activestills

Italy bus crash: at least 16 dead and dozens rushed to hospital

Bus carrying Hungarian passengers, mostly teenagers, crashes and catches fire on motorway near city of Verona
 and agencies-Saturday 21 January 2017

At least 16 people were killed and about 40 injured after a bus carrying Hungarian students crashed and burst into flames on a highway in northern Italy.
The coach crashed into a bridge pillar on the motorway near Verona at about 11pm on Friday.
Girolamo Lacquaniti, the head of the city’s traffic police, said most of the passengers were teenage students and others were teachers and parents. Images from the scene showed the bus engulfed in flames.
Initial reports suggest that most of the victims were trapped by the fire that tore through the coach following the collision. The recovery operation is still in progress and it is thought the death toll could climb.
Most of the passengers on board were Hungarian schoolchildren traveling home from a ski trip in France. A spokesman for Hungary’s foreign ministry said the bus was carrying 54 passengers and had two drivers.
Italian news reports said the French bus driver and his family could be among the victims. The Hungarian foreign minister, Péter Szijjártó, told reporters that one of the most critically injured passengers remains in an induced coma in hospital.
According to Szijjártó, the driver lost control of the coach, which hit a guard rail and then an overpass support before catching fire. He said investigators had so far found no brake marks at the scene.
Italy’s state radio reported that a Slovenian truck driver traveling behind the bus noticed a problem with one of its wheels and tried to alert the driver. According to the broadcaster the truck driver remained at the scene trying to help until investigators arrived.
About 10 of the most seriously injured passengers are still receiving treatment in two Verona hospitals. Those who escaped the wreck unscathed were taken to spend the night in a hotel.
The Hungarian prime minister, Viktor Orbán said in a statement: “With my prayers, I am with the families and friends shocked by the tragedy.”
Lacquaniti told SkyTG24 television: “We are not aware of other vehicles being involved, it seems to have gone off the road of its own accord.”
The national fire service tweeted that the bus had burst into flames. “There are many victims,” it said.
The crash comes days after an avalanche buried a hotel in the Rigopiano resort in the Gran Sasso mountains.

Tehran and Moscow at loggerheads over Syria peace talks: Russia


Iran is opposing US participation in the talks, planned to start on Monday - but Russia says it 'welcomes' their presence

Iranian president Hassan Rouhani meets with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin (Reuters)

Saturday 21 January 2017
Russia and Iran are divided over US participation in planned Syria peace talks, a Moscow official said on Saturday, hinting at a rare public spat between the allies.
A spokesperson for the Kremlin, Dmitry Peskov, told the BBC on Saturday that Russia welcomes potential US participation in the Astana talks, but that Iran is not in agreement.
"We will welcome that," Peskov said in reference to a question on Washington's participation in the peace talks, which were agreed as part of a ceasefire deal last month.
However, he said, "the situation is very complicated."
"The Iranians are not welcoming [US participation]. So it is a very complicated issue for a very careful play."
The talks are scheduled to begin in Astana on Monday, but Peskov said on Saturday that a deal is unlikely to be reached.
"Any deals are unlikely to be reached there, as too many parties are involved in the process," Peskov said.
The US, which backs rebels opposed to president Bashar al-Assad, did not receive its official invitation to join the Astana talks until earlier this week.
The talks are being brokered by Russia and Turkey, which have previously been in direct opposition on Syria, with Turkey - like the US - backing opposition rebels.
However, Turkey on Friday confirmed a long-suspected U-turn in its policy on Syria, saying that it is "no longer realistic" to demand a peace settlement that would remove Assad from power.

Trump’s National Security Team Is Missing in Action

Trump’s train wreck of a transition stumbles into office with key vacancies in top positions and wracked by infighting.
Trump’s National Security Team Is Missing in Action

No automatic alt text available.BY DAN DE LUCEJOHN HUDSON-JANUARY 18, 2017

President-elect Donald Trump will enter the White House Friday with most national security positions still vacant, after a disorganized transition that has stunned and disheartened career government officials.

Instead of hitting the ground running, the Trump team emerged from the election ill-prepared for the daunting task of assembling a new administration and has yet to fill an array of crucial top jobs overseeing the country’s national security and diplomacy, fueling uncertainty across the federal government.

“I’ve never seen anything like this,” one career government official told Foreign Policy.

The delays and dysfunction threaten to cripple the incoming administration from the outset and raise the risk the White House will present confused or contradictory policies to the outside world. Without his team in place, the new president will likely be unprepared should an early-term crisis erupt abroad, or an adversary test the new administration’s mettle, said former officials who served in both Republican and Democratic administrations.

The positions still to be filled include senior management and policy posts that oversee diplomacy, military budgets, nuclear weapons, counterterrorism, and media relations, said Obama administration officials, congressional staffers and people familiar with the transition.

The Trump team has not yet named senior deputies for the State or Homeland Security departments. Meanwhile, dozens of important posts at the Defense Department remain vacant in part because of a growing feud between Trump’s advisors and James Mattis, the retired general picked to serve as the next defense secretary. As for the White House, the Trump team has yet to name a national security advisor for Vice President-elect Mike Pence and other key posts, officials told FP.

The absence of a national security advisor for Pence is all the more significant given the prominent role he appears to be playing in the new administration, including receiving a highly classified daily presidential intelligence briefing. Trump has chosen to receive the briefing about once a week.

The Trump team has either failed to fill key jobs or put forward people who lack the experience or appropriate expertise to do the job. More than one administration official called the transition effort “anemic.” Previous administrations, including Barack Obama’s and George W. Bush’s, were much further along this close to the inauguration.

The troubled transition has stunned career civil servants and former officials who say no previous administration in recent decades has proceeded in such an incoherent way.

A recent poll found that more than half of Americans disapprove of Trump’s handling of the presidential transition. His team, however, said the process is moving with remarkable efficiency.

“This will become the gold standard going forward,” Trump spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters on Wednesday. He added that the Trump team was poised to announce a slew of senior deputy positions at various departments but declined to give a timeline.

At the State Department, senior diplomats said there is little clarity on whether several top career officials will be expected to stay in their positions beyond Friday, when Trump will be sworn in as president. That’s a contrast to the Pentagon, where at least six senior officials have been asked to remain during the Trump administration’s opening weeks.

“There’s a lot of uncertainty, and if the transition team has a plan for maintaining continuity in key roles, they haven’t made that widely known,” said one senior administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The key officials whose roles remain unclear include Tom Shannon, the undersecretary for political affairs and the No. 3 official at the department; Pat Kennedy, the undersecretary for management and resources; Tom Countryman, the undersecretary for arms control; Kristie Kenney, the department’s counselor; and Joe Macmanus, the executive secretary.

“People are assuming that Tom Shannon will carry on and be the senior official for the department as the transition continues, but, again, that’s an assumption,” said the official.

Trump’s choice for national security advisor, Michael Flynn, has handpicked some former associates for White House and other administration positions who share his background in military intelligence and special operations forces but who are not versed in the essence of the job: formulating policy inside the White House out of a host of competing government agencies and agendas.

“They don’t understand the basics of how decision-making works at this level,” another senior administration official said. The outgoing Obama administration officials refer to the new arrivals as “Flynnstones” for their connection to the next national security advisor.

Underlying much of the delay and confusion in the transition is a persistent question about who truly speaks for the president-elect.

In a number of cases, one transition “landing team” at a department has arrived asking for briefings, often on sensitive topics involving classified information, only to be followed by an entirely different transition team asking for the same briefings again.

“It’s difficult to know how much connection or communication they have with New York,” said the senior administration official.

And as different transition “landing teams” have come and gone, the president-elect has alarmed European and Asian allies with provocative tweets while his own cabinet nominees repeatedly contradicted his positions on Russia and other issues at Senate confirmation hearings. On Wednesday, Trump’s nominee for U.N. ambassador, Nikki Haley, broke ranks with the president-elect on a litany of topics, backing sanctions on Moscow and defending the importance of the NATO alliance.

Foreign diplomats from friendly capitals have come away confused by the transition and puzzled about who they should speak to. “We are never sure whether we are meeting with the right people,” one Western diplomat said.

At the Defense Department, a struggle for power and influence has virtually halted the transition in its tracks, former officials and congressional staffers said. Mattis, the pick for defense secretary, was confirmed by the Senate Armed Services Committee by a 26-1 vote Wednesday afternoon and is expected to be easily confirmed within days by the full Senate. But he has been at loggerheads with Trump’s advisors over who should be appointed to senior policy jobs at the Pentagon.

Mattis has opposed prospective appointees pushed by Trump’s inner circle in New York, which includes Steve Bannon, named as a senior White House strategist, and Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and prospective White House advisor. At the same time, candidates the general wants for Pentagon posts — including Republican experts who signed “Never Trump” letters last year — have been rejected or obstructed. As a result, not a single second-tier position has been named, and concern is growing among Mattis’s Republican supporters in Congress, who see him as a seasoned and moderating influence in a White House led by an inexperienced commander in chief.

The Trump team also apparently has given little or no priority to how it will communicate the administration’s policies and stances to the public. The incoming team has not held any handover briefings with press secretaries at the State, Defense, or Homeland Security departments or at the media office of the White House National Security Council (NSC), officials said.

And the Trump team has yet to name anyone to serve as spokesperson for those departments, which typically answer media queries virtually around the clock. Monica Crowley was selected to oversee communications at the NSC, but she withdrew her name amid revelations she had plagiarized numerous passages in her book and her Ph.D. dissertation at Columbia University.

Even the confirmation process for Trump’s cabinet picks has run into trouble, with some nominees failing to file necessary paperwork for ethics reviews and background checks. Trump looks poised to begin his term with the lowest number of confirmed cabinet members of any president in more than a quarter century.

Polls show a majority of Americans disapprove of how Trump is managing his move to the White House, a response that stands in sharp contrast to previous presidents — including Obama — who all received high marks for how they managed their transition. In a Washington Post-ABC News poll, 54 percent disapproved of Trump’s handling of the transition. About eight in 10 Americans approved of the way Obama managed his transition.

Former officials and civil servants say Trump appears to take little interest in following the established model for White House decision-making that evolved over decades under presidents from both parties.

“Unlike State, which can rely on its bureaucracy, the NSC has to be ready on day one as most of its old team leaves,” said Philip Gordon, who served on the NSC in Obama’s and Bill Clinton’s administrations.
“In a normal world, even before a single presidential phone call or meeting or decision, the NSC team would prepare background, points, facts, etc. They will not have a team ready to do that,” Gordon told Politico.

“But it’s not clear Trump operates that way or would use any of the stuff anyway.”

Photo credit: DREW ANGERER/Getty Images
President Trump signs his first executive order in the Oval Office directing agencies to ease the regulatory burdens associated with Obamacare as Vice President Pence swears in Gen. James Mattis and John Kelly. (Reuters)
 
President Trump signed an executive order late Friday giving federal agencies broad powers to unwind regulations created under the Affordable Care Act, which might include enforcement of the penalty for people who fail to carry the health insurance that the law requires of most Americans.

The executive order, signed in the Oval Office as one of the new president’s first actions, directs agencies to grant relief to all constituencies affected by the sprawling 2010 health-care law: consumers, insurers, hospitals, doctors, pharmaceutical companies, states and others. It does not describe specific federal rules to be softened or lifted, but it appears to give room for agencies to eliminate an array of ACA taxes and requirements.

However, some of these are embedded in the law, so it is unclear what latitude the executive branch will have.

Though the new administration’s specific intentions are not yet clear, the order’s breadth and early timing carry symbolic value for a president who made repealing the ACA — his predecessor’s signature domestic achievement — a leading campaign promise.

Additionally, the order’s language about easing economic and regulatory burdens aligns with long-standing Republican orthodoxy that the government exerts too heavy a hand on the U.S. health-care system.

As Republicans in Congress gear up to repeal the Affordable Care Act, two Pennsylvanians reflect on their different experiences under Obamacare. (Alice Li/The Washington Post)

“Potentially the biggest effect of this order could be widespread waivers from the individual mandate, which would likely create chaos in the individual insurance market,” said Larry Levitt, senior vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation. In addition, he said, the order suggests that insurers may have new flexibility on the benefits they must provide.

“This doesn’t grant any new powers to federal agencies, but it sends a clear signal that they should use whatever authority they have to scale back regulations and penalties. The Trump administration is looking to unwind the ACA, not necessarily waiting for Congress,” Levitt said.

The order, several paragraphs long, does not identify which of the many federal rules that exist under the ACA the new administration intends to rewrite or eliminate. In general, federal rules cannot be undone with a pen stroke but require a new rulemaking process to replace or delete them.

But in giving agencies permission to “waive, defer, grant ­exemptions from or delay” ACA rules, the order appears to create room for the Department of Health and Human Services to narrow or gut a set of medical benefits that the ACA compels insurers to include in health plans that they sell to individuals and small businesses.

The order does not mention Medicaid, but it says one of its goals is to “provide greater flexibility to States,” raising the question of whether the Trump HHS might try to loosen rules for states that have expanded the program for lower-income Americans, as the law allows.

The order directs all federal agencies “to minimize the unwarranted economic and regulatory burdens” of the ACA — the first step of Trump’s central campaign promise to repeal and replace former president Barack Obama’s health-care plan.

Trump’s action drew swift protests from ACA proponents who have coalesced to try to preserve the law. “While President Trump may have promised a smooth transition” from the current law to a replacement, said Leslie Dach, director of the fledging Protect Our Care Coalition, “the executive order does the opposite, threatening disruption for health providers and patients.”


Also late Friday, Reince Priebus, Trump’s chief of staff, issued an executive memorandum ordering a freeze on regulations for all government agencies.

The memo could freeze several new Energy Department efficiency standards, such as those affecting portable air conditioners, commercial boilers and uninterruptable power supplies, which were issued Dec. 28 but not yet published in the Federal Register. The regulations were part of the Obama administration’s broader effort to cut greenhouse-gas emissions linked to climate change.

The move echoes a missive that then-White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel sent the heads of every federal agency on Jan. 20, 2009, asking them to freeze any rules that had not yet been published in the Federal Register, and to consider a 60-day extension of the effective date of rules that had not yet gone into effect.

Also Friday, Trump signed the official paperwork installing Defense Secretary James Mattis and Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly, two of his Cabinet picks the Senate voted to confirm earlier in the day.

Trump’s health-care order came at the end of what had otherwise been a largely ceremonial day. The White House did not immediately return requests for comment. 

During his campaign and afterward, Trump pledged that fundamental changes to the health-care system would be a first priority. In a speech outside Philadelphia six days before the November election, Trump vowed to abolish the ACA before he was sworn in. “Have to do it,” he said. “I will ask Congress to convene a special session so we can repeal and replace.”

Last week, both chambers of Congress approved a budget resolution that was the first legislative step toward repealing the 2010 law, which was the centerpiece of the Obama administration’s health policies. But health care was not among a half-dozen issue areas listed on the new ­WhiteHouse.gov website that debuted shortly after noon on Friday.

Earlier Friday, in the Capitol, the new president took several more perfunctory executive actions shortly after he was sworn in at noon, the most notable being to overturn a recent mortgage-fee ­reduction — geared at helping first-time and low-income home buyers — that Obama announced last week and that called for the Federal Housing Administration to cut its annual borrowing fee by a quarter of a percentage point.

Trump also signed a waiver for Mattis to lead the Defense Department, despite his having been retired from military service for only three years. Without the waiver, federal law would have prohibited Mattis from serving as defense secretary until he had been retired from the military for at least seven years.

And just moments after Trump took the oath of office, he began implementing his general vision, transforming the official White House website with a new set of policy pledges that offered the broad contours of the Trump administration’s top priorities. They included fierce support for law enforcement and gun owners’ rights to defend themselves. There were also some notable absences, such as the omission of a policy page on climate change.

The issues page of Trump’s White House offered no new plans or policies but rather a rehash of many of his most prominent campaign promises — a signal to the nation that Trump, more pragmatic than ideological, plans to implement at least the key guideposts of his campaign vision.

The policies laid out on the website included plans to both withdraw from and renegotiate major trade deals, grow the nation’s military and increase cybersecurity capabilities, build a wall at the nation’s southern border and deport undocumented immigrants who have committed violent crimes.

“Our job is not to make life more comfortable for the rioter, the looter, or the violent disrupter,” read the law-and-order section, which calls for “more law enforcement” and “more effective policing.” “Our job is to make life more comfortable for parents who want their kids to be able to walk the streets safely. Or the senior citizen waiting for a bus. Or the young child walking home from school.”

The climate change Web page that existed under Obama was not replaced on the Trump site, with scant mention of climate change under the new president’s energy plan. Also gone or not immediately replaced were Web pages the previous administration had devoted to the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals; people with disabilities; and civil rights more generally.

Trump’s entire campaign was largely a repudiation of Obama, and a new Republican administration is unlikely to have the same set of issues and priorities as an outgoing Democratic one. But the missing issue pages were particularly alarming to Democrats and activists, especially after a vitriolic campaign in which Trump drew criticism for seeming to mock a disabled reporter and being insensitive to the needs and rights of minority communities.

On energy, Trump vowed to eliminate “harmful and unnecessary policies” such as the Climate Action Plan and the Waters of the United States rule. The first represents a variety of efforts Obama had pursued to reduce U.S. ­greenhouse-gas emissions while the second is a rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to protect not only the largest waterways but also smaller tributaries that others believe should fall under the jurisdiction of states rather than the federal government.

The initial Trump website also did not devote a separate section to immigration, another central tenet of his candidacy, though it mentioned immigration under the law enforcement section. Despite rumors within the immigration advocacy community that one of Trump’s initial executive actions could be to revoke Obama’s protections for “dreamers” — undocumented immigrants brought to the country as young children — his website so far focused only on big-picture enforcement and security goals.

“He is dedicated to enforcing our border laws, ending sanctuary cities, and stemming the tide of lawlessness associated with illegal immigration,” read part of the immigration section.

The new administration’s language echoed Trump’s tough rhetoric on the campaign trail, including his promises to strengthen

the law enforcement community, crack down on what he views as a broad range of trade violations and potentially forge alliances with countries long considered dangerous rivals, such as Russia.

“Finally, in pursuing a foreign policy based on American interests, we will embrace diplomacy,” read part of Trump’s policy vision. “The world must know that we do not go abroad in search of enemies, that we are always happy when old enemies become friends, and when old friends become allies.”

Melania Trump, the first lady, also received a biographical overhaul. Her web page featured a black and white glamour shot of her, and touted her jewelry line and modeling career, describing the many high fashion photographers with whom she has worked and the glossy magazines for which she has posed (Vogue and the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition, among others).

The first lady’s biography also correctly stated that she began college at the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia, her home country, but never graduated — a fact that was misstated during the campaign.
Only at the very end of her page did Melania offer a glimpse of the sort of first lady she might be: “Mrs. Trump cares deeply about issues impacting women and children,” read the biography, “and she has focused her platform as First Lady on the problem of cyber bullying among our youth.”
Juliet Eilperin, Chris Mooney and Steven Mufson contributed to this report.

Women lead mass anti-Trump marches across US


Protesters march down Pennsylvania avenue during the Women's March on Washington in Washington, DC. The march drew thousands from across the country to protest newly inaugurated President Donald Trump. (Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images/AFP)

22 Jan 2017

WASHINGTON: Led by women in pink "pussyhats," hundreds of thousands of people flooded the streets of Washington and cities across the United States on Saturday (Jan 21) in a massive outpouring of defiant opposition to President Donald Trump.

Roused by fiery speeches, the protesters sent out a resounding message of resistance the day after the Republican hardliner took office with a vow to roll back the legacy of his predecessor Barack Obama.

"I know that we can do better, we have to fight for the change we want to see," said Michelle Phillips, a 45-year-old recent American citizen, who said she came to take a stand against Trump's "platform of hate and bigotry."

A sea of women and men - teens, pensioners, parents with toddlers on their shoulders - swarmed up the streets around the White House in a good-natured but determined show of unity.

"Women won't back down," "Women's rights are human rights" and "Thank you Trump - you turned me into an activist," read some of the hundreds of handmade signs held aloft in the capital.

Organisers estimated the turnout for the "Women's March on Washington" at half a million, double initial expectations, with huge crowds reported at sister marches nationwide, from Chicago to New York, Boston and Los Angeles.

Saturday's rallying cry was heard far beyond America's shores, with organisers saying over 2.5 million people signed up to take part in one of more than 600 marches being held worldwide.

One of the largest was in London, where tens of thousands of women, men and children marched chanting "Dump Trump."

The human tide flooding the US capital appeared to dwarf the throngs of Trump supporters in red "Make America Great Again!" caps who the day before had cheered his swearing-in.

Washington's Metro stations were overwhelmed as trains packed to bursting ferried cheering, clapping marchers into the city - many wearing knitted "pink pussyhats" in an allusion to Trump's videotaped boasts of grabbing women's "pussies" with impunity.

By 11.00am, the city's Metrorail system said it had moved 275,000 people, eight times a typical Saturday.
Trump's defeated rival Hillary Clinton tweeted her support to the protesters, while former secretary of state John Kerry was spotted in the crowd - a day after leaving office - with his dog on a pink leash.

And Pop diva Madonna, wearing a black pussyhat of her own, made an impromptu appearance on the protest's main stage near Washington's National Mall to deliver an expletive-laden indictment of the president.

"Welcome to the revolution of love," the 58-year-old intoned. "To the rebellion. To our refusal as women to accept this new age of tyranny."

TRUMP'S FIRST FULL DAY

For his first full day in the world's most powerful office, Trump attended a multi-faith service at Washington National Cathedral before visiting the headquarters of the CIA, an agency he feuded with bitterly before taking office.

"I am with you 1,000 per cent," Trump said in a short address to CIA staff - during which he also complained about media coverage of his inauguration which he said played down the turnout.

Trump's inaugural speech on Friday set the tone for his presidency: proudly populist, fiercely nationalist and determined to break with Obama's legacy.

His first act in office - signing an executive order aimed at freezing Obama's signature health care law - was a potent gesture in that direction, with more such actions expected to follow.

But if Friday was Trump's day - marred by sporadic outbreaks of vandalism and more than 200 arrests - Saturday belonged to demonstrators with fresh memories of his fat-shaming a former beauty queen, sex assault allegations and a controversial stance on abortion.

Filmmaker Michael Moore, a march organiser, noted that his copy of the Washington Post was bannered with the headline "Trump Takes Power." "I don't think so. Here is the power," he said, gesturing to the crowd.

'RAILROAD'

Jennifer Behr, a 42-year-old accessory designer, rode a packed train from Baltimore to make her voice heard.

"It's important we assert our majority and we have a large physical presence to show Trump and the Republicans that they cannot railroad our country," she said.

While Trump won 42 per cent of the women's vote, millions who did not vote for him worry that gender rights and other progress on women's health, contraception and abortion could be chipped away.

The Women's March began with a simple Facebook post from Hawaii grandmother and retired lawyer Teresa Shook to about 40 of her friends - but word travelled quickly and the event took on a life of its own.

Dozens of progressive groups backed the march, as well as Amnesty International and Planned Parenthood, the women's health care provider that is a Republican target because of the abortion services it provides.


Indian women "occupy the night streets" to protest reported mass molestation

A woman holds a sign as she takes part in the #IWillGoOut rally, to show solidarity with the Women's March in Washington, along a street in Bengaluru, India, January 21, 2017. REUTERS/Abhishek N. Chinnappa--A woman holds a sign as she takes part in the #IWillGoOut rally, to show solidarity with the Women's March in Washington, along a street in Mumbai, India, January 21, 2017. REUTERS/Shailesh Andrade
Women take part in the #IWillGoOut rally, to show solidarity with the Women's March in Washington, along a street in Bengaluru, India, January 21, 2017. REUTERS/Abhishek N. Chinnappa--A sign supporting women's rights hangs on a tree before the start of an #IWillGoOut event, organized to show solidarity with the Women's March in Washington, inside a public park in Kolkata, India, January 21, 2017. REUTERS/Rupak De Chowdhuri

By Nita Bhalla and Anuradha Nagaraj-Sat Jan 21, 2017

NEW DELHI/CHENNAI (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Hundreds of women gathered in over 30 towns and cities across India late on Saturday, saying they were "occupying the night streets" to demand safety in public spaces after reports of the mass molestation of women in Bengaluru city on New Year's Eve.

From the capital New Delhi to Kolkata in the east, Chennai in the south and Mumbai in the west, activists, students, and professionals gathered at marches and street plays or sang songs and recited poetry on equality for women.

The participants, which also included many men, chanted slogans such as "Freedom, Freedom, Freedom!" and held banners saying "Take back the night. Break the silence. End the violence" and "Nobody asks what my molester was wearing."

"Since the age of 12, I have never felt comfortable or safe on the streets - day or night, but first time I have ever attended a march like this ," said Anuradha Sinha, 37, a program manager at a e-commerce company.

"I have a 3-year-old daughter and given the situation we face today in terms of sexual harassment, I don't want my daughter to grow up and endure we have to go through every day. It has to change."

The marches coincided with marches being held around the world following U.S. President Donald Trump's inauguration on Friday, but organisers of the #IWillGoOut campaign said their demands were different from those in other countries.

The campaign in India was launched this month after reports of sexual assaults during celebrations on Dec. 31 in Bengaluru, where several women were allegedly groped and assaulted by a mob in the city's central business district.

The state home minister later told television networks "such incidents do happen", while another politician blamed women for following "western culture", dressing inappropriately and staying out late.

The attacks, reminiscent of those blamed on migrants in German cities during New Year's Eve celebrations in 2015, shocked many Indians, since Bengaluru, home to many well-educated professionals, is regarded as safer for women than New Delhi.

Sex crimes are common in India, where the National Crime Record Bureau says more than 34,000 rapes were reported in 2015, although women sometimes do not report assaults for fear of the associated social stigma.

The fatal gang rape of a woman by six assailants aboard a bus in Delhi in December 2012 sparked global outrage and led to calls for greater protection for women moving around India's cities.

While the government has brought in tougher legislation on sexual assault, activists say more could have been done.

At least 30 Indian towns and cities - including Hyderabad, Jaipur, Ahmedabad, Puducherry, Lucknow, Pune, Jammu, Dharamsala and Bhopal - held events, with a few hundred participants turning out in each city, said organisers.

In Bengaluru, where around 300 people gathered, organisers said most women have experienced being pinched, groped, molested, or faced lewd comments in public -- from travelling on the bus to shopping in the market to walking in the street.

"I have so many stories of being made to feel uncomfortable in public spaces," said Divya Titus, one of the organisers of the Bengaluru march.

"Despite a legislation, we still see sexual harassment. I decided enough is enough. We have to stop normalising these events."

(Reporting by Nita Bhalla @nitabhalla in Delhi and Anuradha Nagaraj @AnuraNagaraj in Chennai. 

Additional reporting by Subrata Nagchoudhury in Kolkata. Editing by Astrid Zweynert. Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers humanitarian news, women's rights, trafficking, property rights, climate change and resilience. Visit news.trust.org)

Yahya Jammeh leaves the Gambia after 22 years of rule

After initially refusing to accept election defeat, Yahya Jammeh has flown out of Banjul to make way for Adama Barrow

 Some people who fled The Gambia have returned, but many have chosen to stay away until Yahya Jammeh has gone. Photograph: Jerome Delay/AP

Gambia president Adama Barrow
Adama Barrow-----------------------------------------Yahya Jammeh

 in Banjul, and agencies-Saturday 21 January 2017

Yahya Jammeh, the former Gambian president, has left the Gambia after he finally agreed to step down following 22 years of rule.

Jammeh flew out of the capital Banjul on Saturday and into exile after stepping down from power, witnesses and mediators said.

The authoritarian leader took power in a 1994 coup – but stepped down in the face of pressure from West African armies that entered Gambia to force him to recognise that he lost an election in December to Adama Barrow.

In a midnight broadcast on state television after weeks of negotiation, Jammeh pledged to make way for Barrow.

The Guinean president, Alpha Condé, and the UN’s regional chief, Mohammed Ibn Chambas, had remain in the capital, and a regional force was positioned in the country, ready to move in if Jammeh changed his mind and again refused to cede power.

Jammeh’s departure heralds the first democratic transition of power the Gambia has seen.
Jammeh initially accepted defeat, but later rejected the election result and declared a national state of emergency in an attempt to cling to power.

The streets were deserted in the small administrative capital that surrounds the presidential residence, where vultures amassed in the grounds, but Bakau and Serrekunda were coming back to life.

Malick Njie, a young man selling T-shirts in the area of the city that has seen the biggest pro-Barrow celebrations in the past month, said: “Gambia has decided.

“I sold 200 this morning, and 1,500 yesterday,” he said, rustling in a large plastic bag full of banknotes for change. “Before, it was dangerous. We printed them and hid them.”

When she heard troops from the Economic Community of West African States were coming, Fatou Minteh bought enough food for her family to survive for three weeks, and they all hid at home. On Saturday morning, she was buying T-shirts for herself and her children.

“Three days ago, when you wore this you were arrested, but now we’re going to wear them to boot out the old president and welcome the new one,” she said.

“They say Gambia is divided, because the vote was split between him and Barrow, but his voters had three voting cards each. They voted three times. Gambia is not divided, we’re one people.”

Asitou Jallow, a traditional healer sitting on the pavement with her powders spread out in front of her, said Jammeh’s flip-flopping had hit her in the pocket.

“It’s been very quiet these past few days, nobody’s been out, though I was here. I’ve lost a lot of money for food and rent in these days. But now, thank God, we’re seeing people come out again, now that Barrow is president.”

As well as mysterious bottles of brown liquid and shrivelled-looking bundles, on Saturday she had new wares on display.

“Generally I sell herbal medicine, but today I’m selling photos of Barrow too. I like Barrow, and Jammeh has stepped down. I was a Jammeh supporter, but what can I do?”

Many Gambians chatted about the future, discussing what they would like Barrow to do first as president. Human rights organisations followed suit.

“Jammeh’s departure gives Gambia the chance to usher in an era based on respect for the rule of law and human rights,” said Jim Wormington, a west Africaresearcher at Human Rights Watch. “Barrow has the opportunity to nurture an open society in which diverse opinions, including peaceful dissent, are recognised as crucial for building a better country,”

Barrow, still across the border in Senegal, said he would get to work immediately on rebuilding the Gambia’s economy and righting the wrongs of the past 22 years.

“To all of you who were forced by political circumstances to flee the country, you now have the liberty to return home,” he said.

Most of the 45,000 people who have left the Gambia in recent weeks for fear violence have stayed where they are for now, reluctant to move until they hear Jammeh has really gone. Banjul ferry, one of the main routes in and out of the city, was deserted.

Sheriff Bojang Junior, however, a journalist whose criticism of Jammeh’s government led to to death threats that caused him to flee to Senegal, took Barrow at his word. He took a pirogue – a brightly painted wooden boat – across the Gambia river to his home city on Saturday morning, and looked about him, disoriented in the place he left 15 years ago.

“I felt we are free. All I needed was Jammeh saying he resigned,” he said. “Even though I had security concerns, his legitimacy came to an end, so I’m not bothered. It would just be rebels disregarding the constitution that would harm me.

“Hey! Give me one of those in XL,” he broke off, calling to a man selling Gambia Has Decided T-shirts.