Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

SRI LANKA: CTF RECOMMENDS AT LEAST ONE INT’L JUDGE TO TRY WAR CRIMES

c1qkxnmusaiuzyc
Image: Foreign Minister speaking at the event for handing over the Consultation Task Force Report at the Presidential Secretariat.

Sri Lanka BriefRead the final report here.

04/01/2017

The Consultation Task Force on Reconciliation Mechanisms (CTF) in its final report submitted on Tuesday recommended to have a majority of national judges and at least one international judge on every bench to try war crimes and serious violation of Human Rights allegedly taken place in Sri Lanka.
“The Court shall ensure that there will be a majority of national judges and at least one international judge on every bench,” it recommended.

It also stated that: “International crimes such as war crimes and crimes against humanity must be criminalised and incorporated into Sri Lankan law immediately through legislation, without temporal prescriptions and in a manner that allows for the prosecution of these crimes committed in the past, in line with Article 13(6) of the Constitution and Article 13(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).”

The report said that consultations in the North and East in particular, as well as in some in the rest of the country, revealed the overwhelming lack of trust in the State, its institutions and mechanisms. The belief was strongly expressed that exclusively domestic mechanisms would not be credible. At the same time, consultations outside of the North and East and with the armed forces, revealed strong opposition to international participation on the mechanisms. Many however, did recognise that given the limitations of existing national capacity in specific areas, international expertise should be engaged. The CTF also notes the commitments made by the Government of Sri Lanka on international participation in the mechanisms, in the resolution that it co-sponsored at the UN Human Rights Council in October 2015.

“Therefore, the CTF recommends the participation of both international and national personnel on the four mechanisms ranging from the provision of advice and expertise to active membership of the mechanisms including as judges and prosecutors, as spelt out in the UN Human Rights Council Resolution of October 2015, co-sponsored by the Government of Sri Lanka.” It said.

Further, the report recommend that “the Special Court should be mandated to try international crimes, including war crimes and crimes against humanity and pay particular attention to crimes of sexual violence and crimes against children. Bearing in mind the mandate of the court in terms of transitional justice and addressing impunity, the CTF recommends that there be no temporal limitations to the jurisdiction of the Special Court.”

The CTF presented its final report to former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, the Chairperson of the Office for National Unity and Reconciliation (ONUR) on Tuesday at the Presidential Secretariat.

The CTF was appointed by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe on the January 26, 2016 to ascertain public views, particularly those of affected communities across the country, on the reconciliation mechanisms proposed by the Government and incorporated in the Resolution on Sri Lanka at the UN Human Rights Council.

The CTF comprises 11 prominent civil society members with Manouri Muttetuwegama serving as Chairperson and Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu as Secretary.

Issuing a statement the CTF said it was assisted in its work by two advisory panels—one of Experts and the other of Representatives. Consultations throughout the country were carried out by 15 CTF-appointed Zonal Task Forces (ZTFs).

The ZTFs conducted public meetings in all districts as well as focus group discussions with affected individuals and communities.

Would Raviraj's fate transpire to five students in Trincomalee? 11 years sans justice!

Would Raviraj's fate transpire to  five students in Trincomalee? 11 years sans justice!

Jan 04, 2017

Since the five students in Trincomalee were shot and killed brutally on the 02nd of January 2006 it is 11 years with justice equidistant. It appears not arriving at all!

The five students murdered in this manner in the vicinity and foot of the Gandhi statue were Manoharan Ragihar(1985/09/22)Yogaraj Hemachandra (1985/03/04) Logidaraja Rohan (1985/04/07) Dingathurai Sivanandan(1985/04/06) Shanmugaraj Gajendran (1985/09/16).At that moment all students killed had not completed twenty one years of  age.
.Even if fate is not believed by us as a cruel comic story of the students in their tender ages were brutally killed at the foot of the inoffensive father. But .the culprits who brutally killed the students roam at large within Sri Lanka should not be forgotten.
The constant recline of the police was quite obvious. The police investigations had commenced in their usual inimitable style in the tilt back fashion. The police had lamented that when the students had attempted to hurl hand grenades at them they had exploded killing them instantaneously. In contrary when the post-mortem were conducted it had revealed that they had died of bullet injuries when remnants of bullets were found in them. This is how the sprawl of the police was surfaced.
However it is very scarcely that one comes across very truthful police officers in Sri Lanka police. It is a known fact the majority who makes “Kabaragoyas” “ Talagoyas.” The people who inflict  indigestion are those who guzzle food excessively.
If an illustration is desired during the entire past era it should be reminded to the police chiefs that the suspects who were taken to expose the arms have succumbed when trying to grab arms
The whole country knows the law not appropriate to slain Raviraj. Then the utter is about the law not adequate to verify evidence. It is now 11 years after the murder of the five students. There is no impartiality at any striking distance.The only person to lead evidence was the father of a student killed.But unfortunately through fear the entire family has migrated overseas. That too as the family had to seize evasive scuffle against death threats.
 On the 22nd ultimo on the insistence of the plaintiff in front of a Sinhala speaking Jury the former Member of Parliament of the Jaffna district Nadaraja Raviraj’s case was heard.The case was heard uninterrupted. The verdict was delivered by the Magistrate  just past midnight on the 23rd ultimo after it was decided by the Jury that there were no conclusive evidence against the suspects .Hence all suspects were exonerated against the charges ,freed and released. Among the suspects were three Navy personnel. What the layman should believe that Nadaraja Raviraj had committed suicide?
The slain Nadaraja Raviraj was acclaimed by the Sinhalese community highly as he spoke flowing Sinhala language while representing the Tamil National Alliance. In the canteen inside the Parliament Raviraj had been having meals, speaking in Sinhala with the President, Prime Minister and the colleagues.
If this was the verdict for Raviraj’s killing what could one expect for the suspects in the killing of the five students is quite natural to envisage.
The life in a country sans justice
On this earth there is more anguish than when someone so close vanishes. That is felt only those who facade such situations. When the law deprives justice by been dumb where could such persons set out to? The President Maithripala Sirisena however had lamented that he does not need advice from the international judiciary as he has confidence in our own judiciary. In that sense the layman too have questions to pose. Who are those who killed Raviraj? Who are those who killed the five students in Trincomalee? Where are the punishments to them?
 In a country where insane dogs have been unleashed it is treacherous to live in a society prone to those dogs that would bite at any moment in very uncertain. We should not be fooled by outside camouflage at all times. The insecurity in small and large magnitudes prevails as earlier. Will terminate remembering  Father Martin Niemolar.
“ At  the end he came to my rescue as no one was there to defend on my behalf.”................. !

AG TO APPEAL AGAINST RAVIRAJ VERDICT

nadarajah_sriyanha_2359011f

Sri Lanka Brief04/01/2017

Attorney General Jayantha Jayasuriya PC said he is considering appealing against the verdict of Parliamentarian Nadaraja Raviraj murder case before the Appeal Court.

He said the very day after the verdict was announced, he had requested the Court Registrar to forward the case record to him.

He was perusing other points concerned until the case record is received by him.Colombo High Court Judge Manilal Waidyatilleke issuing the verdict in the case involving the murder of Raviraj and his security guard acquitted and released all five accused in the case in keeping with the unanimous decision of the special jury.

Six accused including three navy intelligence officers who were accused over the murder of former TNA Jaffna district MP Nadaraja Raviraj were acquitted and released on December 24, 2016 from the case after they were found not guilty by the Colombo High Court.

The verdict which was delivered by High Court Judge Manilal Waidyatilleke as per the unanimous decision reached by the jury, came following a month long trial.

The jury’s decision was that the accused cannot be convicted based solely on the fact that they were identified by several witnesses in the case.

The High Court allowed to proceed with the Raviraj murder trial in absentia of the three accused Palana Sami Suresh alias Sami, Sivakanthan Vivekanandan alias Charan and Fabian Royston Toussaint who were evading Court since the initiation of investigations.

The indictments were filed against six accused Palana Sami Suresh alias Sami, Prasad Chandana Kumara alias Sampath, Gamini Seneviratne, Pradeep Chaminda alias Vajira, Sivakanthan Vivekanandan alias Charan and Fabian Royston Tousssaint on five counts, including committing the murder of former MP Nadaraja Raviraj and his security officer Lokuwella Murage Lakshman under the provisions of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) and Penal Code.

Three accused who were not present before Court, had been identified as ex-LTTE cadres affiliated to the Karuna faction. Wijeya Wickrema Manamperige Sanjaya Preethi Viraj was made State witness in the Raviraj murder trial.

Raviraj was shot dead near his residence at Manning Town in Narahenpita during the period between November 9, 2006 and November 10, 2006 when he was driving his vehicle along Martha Road. The CID recovered the trishaw and the weapon alleged to have been used in the killing of the former Parliamentarian.

Kamani Alwis/DN
BY Mirudhula Thambiah-2017-01-03
Jaffna District Tamil National Alliance (TNA) Parliamentarian and Leader of People's Liberation OrganiZation of Tamil Eelam (PLOTE) Dharmalingam Sithadthan said there are positive signals in obtaining land and Police powers to the provinces. "Police and land powers are very important. There are positive signals on these matters. Power sharing is positive. We are in discussions with the government and hopefully we might be able to reach an agreement," he said. Following are excerpts of the interview:
?: When the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) obtained the people's mandate at the last Parliamentary Elections, your leader Sampanthan promised to obtain a political solution by the end of 2016, however, why do you think the process has been dragging?
A: We believed that a political solution will be obtained by the end of 2016 and we said the matter will be settled by then because we wanted to show the urgency of it. We also insisted to the government that a political solution must be reached by the end of 2016. We cannot at once say that nothing has happened too, there are various attempts taken forward to implement the Constitutional Reforms. There is the steering committee at the Constitutional Council which is continuing to function and the Council is meeting on the 9, 10 and 11 of this month for discussions on the Constitutional Reforms.
Therefore, there are developments that have already taken place in this government and there will be more developments, while things are continuing to happen, how can we say no?
We cannot say the government has not attempted within the one year period to solve the national question and just walk out. Therefore, we shall continue until the end. This had been our attitude throughout.
?: TNA wants a federal solution within a united Sri Lanka; however, the government seems unyielding on the term 'federalism'. Tell us how far it is practical? If chances are less for a federal solution will the TNA change its stance?
A: Not only the government, all parties from the South also never accepted it. It is in the negotiating process. The government is currently not in a position to step into a federal solution. However, we are in the stance that we must definitely adopt a federal solution. Our mandate has always been on federalism. We did not just come up with federalism during the 2015 Parliamentary Election but had been on the same stance since the 1956 elections. During this election majority of the Tamil people voted for a federal solution. They did not stop there. They have always voted for the federal concept in a continuous process. Initially the Federal Party, the Tamil United Liberation Front and other Tamil parties that contested elections have continued to contest on the federal demand. Therefore, our demand has always been for a federal solution within a united Sri Lanka. We will continue to discuss for a federal solution with the government.
It is very difficult to have our demands fulfilled, especially, on a federal solution. Both sides (TNA and government) have to discuss and reach a point at which we can meet our demand.
As far as we are concerned it will be very difficult for us to compromise on our basic demand. Federal means there is lot more to discuss; we will continue our dialogue with the government and see where we can reach.
?: The Sri Lankan Global Forum has warned President Sirisena that proposals submitted by some six groups for Constitutional Reforms would lead to a separation of Sri Lanka. Also the President had clearly stated that he will not allow it; how do you view it?
A: In any community, whoever it is when they live far away they become nationalists. Let it be Tamils, Sinhalese, Palestinians or Sikhs they become nationalists when they live far away from their country. They live comfortable while those in the country are suffering. Therefore, what I see is just an expression of their nationalist concerns.
?: One of the main demands of the TNA in the power sharing process would be to obtain land and Police powers to the provinces. Did the government show any positive signals towards it?
A: Although the land and Police powers are not satisfying, it is included to the 13th Amendment. We always stressed that it is inadequate. Especially, the land powers are more important for us, because of our experiences over colonization. We are discussing on that with the government and hopefully we might be able to reach an agreement.
Police and land powers are very important and there are positive signals on these matters. Power sharing is positive.
?: Are there any positive moves in the Constitutional Reforms as you promised in the parliamentary elections in 2015?
A: When I spoke to the government representatives, who are SLFP and UNP members on the Steering Committee in the Constitutional Council, they say the ship is moving in turmoil. But still they will continue for a better position. I see the same in the Electoral Reforms too, there is nothing concrete been done, yet, the Executive Presidency has not been fully abolished and at the same time, there are many problems in obtaining devolution. Most of the parties are having negative approaches. Therefore, Constitutional Reforms are continuing on a difficult process. We have to wait and watch!
?: TNA had always insisted on a North-East merger, but the majority of the Muslim Community in the East does not support it anymore. Does that mean the merger will be impossible?
A: Unless the Tamils and Muslims have an understanding on this matter, it will be very difficult. Earlier we had discussions with the SLMC founder and leader Ashraff, during former President Chandrika Kumaratunga's period. We were able to agree on certain grounds. But now the Muslims are more against the North-East merger.
There are several reasons for their stand, first is there is no war and there is no pressure on them. When we had discussions with Ashraff the merger was there. At that time the war was on and there was a lot of pressure on the Muslim community. Currently they say 40 per cent is their population in the East and if both provinces are merged it will reduce to 17 per cent. It will be very difficult for them too. There is a long ongoing discussion but there is no solution.
We do understand the position of the Muslim community. However, as far as Tamils are concerned the North and East is their traditional homeland. We should put it as Tamil speaking, as at one time the Muslims also very closely associated with the Tamils and they never wanted to have a separate identity. They wanted to be a Tamil speaking community. However, after the war, there is a definite division between the Tamils and the Muslims. Therefore, I feel it is the duty of the Tamil and Muslim leaders to see that both communities are for reconciliation, for the benefit of both communities.
?: Most minority politicians claim that the series of hate speech against the minority communities is a planned agenda. What is your stand?
A: It is nothing new. Whenever, there are attempts to solve the national question, whether it was the Bandaranaike-Chelvanayakam period, the Dudley-Chelvanayakam or even the Indo-Lanka Accord hate speech was coming out especially from the South. Those in the South think they can claim political mileage from such hate speeches. But they never realize unless this problem is solved, the country cannot function in peace.
Every time there is an attempt to settle the issue, there had been destructions not just in the North and East but the whole country economically, politically and in all other aspects. Whether they like it or not both communities (minorities) should live in this country forever, for which we need an amicable political settlement. All communities of this country should work together for the progress of this country.
?: The recent change in the Presidency of the United States and at the helm of the United Nations. What will be the impact of these changes, will they be positive or negative, on the issue of grievances of minority communities in Sri Lanka?
A: As far as we are concerned, our friends in the United States and in the diplomatic service have said that President elect Donald Trump has openly said he doesn't want to meddle with any international affairs, but just want to stick to his country's affairs. He had said it is useless to spend time on other countries. I think his interests will remain within America in future. We must observe the situation as he has not taken oaths yet. Therefore, I feel he will not take any interest with regard to our country issues.
The Secretary General of the UN alone cannot take actions; he must act on the visions of the member countries. Therefore, it depends on how the other member countries would take up the matter of the Sri Lankan Tamils. Even in the past only America lead the actions on the resolution.
I don't see any benefit as such. We must wait and watch.
Email: che.myhero@gmail.com
untitled-2 untitled-3

logountitled-1

Christmas Day revenue

Thursday, 5 January 2017

There was a news item online that the Road Development Authority recorded revenue of Rs. 18.185 million from the Southern Expressway on 25 December and another Rs. 9.55 million from Katunayake Expressway on 23 December.

RDA Director S. Opanayake is very happy about the collections and he comments that this is the highest revenue in the last five years. He mentions that the daily traffic is about 43,000 vehicles on the Southern Expressway, bringing in Rs. 11.5 million, while on the Katunayake Expressway it is 24,000 vehicles bringing in Rs. 6.5 million revenue. He is happy about both the increase in vehicles patronising the highways and reduction in accidents due to more disciplined driving.

Survivalist and Irrepressible: The Two Faces of the Sri Lankan Media




GEHAN GUNATILLEKE-on 
Introduction

The past decade produced two critical moments of transition in Sri Lanka. On 19 May 2009, a 30-year war came to a brutal end with the defeat of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). On 9 January 2015, the regime responsible for ending the war was ousted from power after ten years of autocratic rule. The media is often expected to play a pivotal role in these moments of transition. Yet the past decade witnessed one of the darkest eras in the history of Sri Lanka’s mainstream media. During this period, it was reduced to self-censorship, self-doubt and servility. Meanwhile, an unpredictable yet dynamic alternative emerged outside the mainstream. By 2014, this alternative media blossomed into a radical force capable of influencing and consolidating opinion.

Electing Sirisena As The President: Have We Made The Correct Choice?


Colombo Telegraph
By DNR Samaranayaka –January 4, 2017
DNR Samaranayaka
DNR Samaranayaka
The expectations about the changes that could occur as a result of President Sirisena’s victory had led many people to believe that Sri Lanka will enter into a new phase under the Sirisena administration. Most people expected a change in the political culture that plagued the country with rising corruption and falling law and order. Since Sirisena was known to be a simple person with no direct links to political corruption or any other anti-social activities, he began to receive a wider support as the nominee for the presidency. This support would not have been possible if Ranil Wickremesinghe was the candidate opposing Mahinda Rajapaksa. He would have certainly added another loss to his long list of failures since the early 1990’s.
Although Maithripala Sirisena was in politics for nearly 50 years, he was not known to be a dynamic politician who has achieved anything of significance. He started as a ‘Gramaniladhari’, which is the administrative tier at the lowest level in the public service. After a few years, he joined SLFP to pursue a full time career in politics. In 1989, he contested on SLFP ticket and became a member of parliament. He rose from an ordinary member of the party to be the Secretary of SLFP—the most influential position within the party. He has been a minister since 2004; at the time he left the part to accept the coalition nominee for the presidency, he was the Minister of Health. His main interests, as the Health Minister, were the reduction of tobacco and liquor consumption in Sri Lanka. For this effort, he received two awards from the Harvard University and World Health Organization (WHO).maithripala-sirisena-pic-via-his-facebook
After nearly two years at the helm, it is beginning to cast doubts as to whether the people have made the correct choice of electing Sirisena as the President and allowing him to enjoy executive powers with a lavish life style at the tax payer’s expense. Although he frequently makes statements highlighting his achievements, it is difficult to find any evidence to support these claims. As briefly discussed below, his claims of achievements only show his attempts to seek cheap publicity.
I restored democracy after 2015: Sirisena, The Hindu, Nov. 11, 2016
In a recent interview with The Hindu newspaper, Sirisena said, “Those who have been in power and have lost power are trying to sabotage all these activities”……”They are abusing and misusing the democratic freedom that I have restored in this country.” He further said, “When the people made me the President, they did not ask me for food, water or clothes. They wanted a society where they could live freely and happily. I have given that to the people.”
The President Sirisena has a very short memory. The freedom that people began to enjoy after the election is not the making of President Sirisena. The country had already moved in this direction even before the election was held. The 2015 election was one of the cleanest elections that the country had seen for a long time under any government. Most elections in the past were marred by riots and vote rigging, but none of these was seen in the 2015 election. There were no evidence of intimidation, abductions of opposition candidates, violence aimed at the opposition, or any other form of threat to peace during the election. There was no stuffing of marked ballet papers in sealed boxes, and even the police were acting much more responsibly compared to other elections in recent times. The election commissioner and even the foreign observers gave a clean report on this election.
Ethical conduct in the Public Service

2017-01-05
According to the dictionary meaning ‘Ethic’ is the study of what is right and what is wrong in human behaviour. In this context I would like to regard the meaning of the term work ethic in relation to public servants, in the simplest term to mean attitude to work.

As human beings we do certain things in the proper way in keeping with the law of the country, rules and regulations, precedence social practices and cultural norms cherished and valued by the people with a view of satisfying the needs and wants of the General Public. Very often we fail to do things in the correct and proper way. My attempt in this piece of writing is to identify the instances when we go wrong in our efforts to do things as public servants in the proper way in keeping with the accepted procedures, rules and regulations in a manner to satisfy the needs and wants of the masses who are our masters. Direct and indirect taxes paid by them are used to pay ours salaries.  

Attitude to work
Attitude to work on the part of an individual, organization or a society or even a country or a region is the result of the impact and influences of a number of variations, environmental and socio-cultural influences, ethnic prejudices and such other. This means that work ethics differ from country to country and even in respect of much smaller units of organizations and the society. Hence, work ethics in our country cannot be identified in Toto with those in other countries except in instances in which we experience similar economies and environments in general.  

Cultural influence and value systems
Work ethics in any country or society is largely influenced by its culture. Culture has been defined a collective programming of the mind which distinguishes members of one group of a society from another. Culture is reflected in the meaning people attach to various aspects of life. Work ethics in any given society has a direct relationship to its value systems. Values are sets of inter-related ideas, concepts and principles which individuals, groups and societies attach strong sentiments. Every society has a set of values and it is this which differentiates people from one another. Values exist in regard to all realms of life and in any given society are in a sense a reflection of shared values. While integrated value systems provide a sense of meaning and purpose of existence and also a sense of stability and identity. It also results in strong attitudes and prejudices and thus what is a norm in one society becomes the aberration in another.   

Social prejudices, economic imperatives and structural forces
 Ethics in any society is also influenced by Social prejudices economic imperatives and structural forces of a particular organization. If one does not comprehend or does not care to comprehend the nature in a particular society he/she would fail to understand problems of that society.   

Sri Lankan experience in work ethics
Sri Lankans have been subjected to two pervasive influences, viz. the Indian civilization and the Western colonization. The Indian cultural ethos as expressed n the Indian philosophies and religions have had deep impressions on the way of thinking of the people in Sri Lanka. This explains the similarities in behavioural pattern among the people in the sub continent including Sri Lanka Although we hail for a glorious past we have been weakened by centuries of colonial rule. Although we feel proud of our ancient times of cultural and social advancement we must admit the fact that we frankly acknowledged the superiority of the Western civilization and look to it for guidance.  
It is pertinent to salient traits in Si Lankan national character to understand the Sri Lankan attitude to everything including work ethic  

Absence  of commitment and absence of total involvement 
There is a marked commitment and absence of total involvement that enables one to carry a task from the start to the end through trials and tribulations. It expresses itself at many levels. At the individual level promises are made but not kept or partly kept. A great amount of initial enthusiasm amounts to not more than the fizz of the soda bottle, At the collective level despite the loud proclamations of faith in objectives there are no sustained efforts   

In spite of various plans and programmes launched to fulfil the needs and wants of the people many of them suffer by not being able to achieve their ends.. Plans and projects are often not completed. In some areas farmers do not receive water in time for cultivation and they find it difficult to sell the yields at reasonable prices as arrangements for purchasing the crops and storing them are not made allowing the profiteers to have their own way. Ceremonies are held to open construction works, building roads and at later stages they remain undone . Sometimes bridges constructed halfway are washed away during the floods, Highway rules and regulations regarding hotels and eating houses garbage disposal, sanitation,, environment protection, gambling illicit distilling and a host of other measures are implemented off and on and sometimes limited to the opening ceremony like the fizz of a soda bottle and the culprits are free to have their own way leaving the masses to suffer.
Sometimes projects inaugurated by one party remain undone not being followed up due to differences of opinion. This happens due to substantial effort not having been made at the individual level and the group level.   

Constraints in the growth of personal autonomy
Colonial rule established an attitude of dependence which was reinforced by family environment is a constraint in the growth of personal autonomy. There is a pervasive dependence on the government for everything which has eroded self reliance. Along with dependence there is also deep distrust of authority hardly by a healthy and conducive climate for peoples’ participation. Diddling government funds and robbing or vandalizing government equipment is considered the done thing.   

Failure in expressing intense feeling
South Asians including Sri Lankans have difficulties in expressing, especially in aggression and anxiety. Democratic principle of toleration and compromise is very often rejected. There is no pattering and shaping of aggression as in the West.  When aggression is aroused in our part of the world it may burst out in a chaotic way as in 1971, 1983 and 1988.   

Workers are compelled to win their rights through threats, strikes, protest campaigns etc. because their masters or employers often cannot be convinced of the grievances through negotiations.  
Efficacy and power of words
We exhibited a remarkable faith in the efficacy and power of words. Every day we read in our newspapers of men with high sounding words proclaiming to the world of anything and everything and in the final analysis nothing. 

They do not often bother about the implementation of what is proclaimed in words for much what is said is just not implementable.Words but not deeds. Ours is a nation of slogan shouters and bearers of banners with slogans

Failure to believe in the value of time
In our institutes of public service training and private sector training institutions seminars are conducted on the value of time management and the need to work without wasting time a single hour. However, all such seminars, lectures etc. fall on deaf ears of most of us. Often we wait for “Good hours” avoiding “Bad Hours”based on the horoscope readings. Time flies and we cannot catch and preserve time. Such attitudes deprive us of the benefit that can be achieved through time management.  
Attitudes of a public servant - to be a good Samaritan 
Everyone must feel and know that if he/she works hard he/she can go ahead. In any event he/she should maintain his/he self respect. Self respect can be earned by being virtuous – by making the beneficiaries or the General Public – the rate payers contended by providing the services to the best of his/her ability. He/she should be a Good Samaritan. One cannot be a Good Samaritan by showing his/her power and authority-by virtue of holding a high position – occupying spacious and well equipped office rooms and using luxury cars. 

It is a pity that such high rank officers enjoy all that they wish while their counter – parts in lower ranks are compelled to share tables in the corridors. In public service training institutions like SLIDA trainees are made to live with ordinary families during a certain period and gain experience (village immersion programme) They are thus provided with opportunities to change their attitudes towards the General Public.  

Trainees come to know the needs and wants of the people when once they occupy substantial positions they get inclined to serve the masses well. Thus if you want a healthy work ethic we have to create the conditions which would contribute to it – respect for values and value systems enshrinement of the merit principle in recruitment and promotion, prospects of material achievement and above all self respect.

untitled-4

logoThursday, 5 January 2017

President Maithripala Sirisena says that the Muslim IDPs have encroached and destroyed land belonging to the Wilpattu National Park (June 2015).

President Sirisena says Muslims have not cleared one inch of Wilpattu Land (December 2016)

President Sirisena orders the expansion of the forest reserve by taking over the land allocated to the Muslim IDPs of Musali South, Mannar (December 2016)

A minority of Buddhists and certain media organisations along with a few environmentalists have succeeded in the second ethnic cleansing of the Northern Muslims through the current Presidential order.

President Maithripala Sirisena in June 2015 claimed that the Muslims had encroached and cleared large tracts of land belonging to the Wilpattu National Park. He said he witnessed this when he took a helicopter tour of the Wilpattu and Musali areas in the Mannar District.

Today, he says that the Muslims have not encroached even an inch in to the Wilpattu national reserve, but says that the lands allocated to the Muslims by the Government in 2013 are illegal and that all these areas have to be expanded as a reserve for the Wilpattu National Park.

Buddhist extremists led by certain monks and supported by some media institutions have been on a concerted effort to deprive the right of return of the Muslim Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) from the time land was allocated to them by the former regime of Mahinda Rajapaksa. They are also supported by some Environmentalists who are not sensitive to the rights of Muslim citizens of this country.

The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam forcibly evicted the Muslims of the Northern Province in 1990 in the worst ethnic cleansing ever, in the history of Sri Lanka. The unfortunate Muslims were given two hours’ notice to leave their homes in certain areas and the others were forced out with less than 24 hours’ notice. They were not allowed to take with them any valuables or documents. 100,000 Muslims were thus expelled, and they trekked to the south and were forced to live as refugees in different parts of the country during the next 25 years.
untitled-3

The forgotten people

With the end of the war in 2009, the Government undertook the resettlement of 300,000 Tamils who were displaced by the 30-year war. The Muslims, who were expelled by the LTTE in 1990, were not resettled along with the Tamil IDPs.

The Government had the policy of ‘last in first out’, where the Northern Task Force headed by presidential sibling and strongman Basil Rajapaksa undertook the huge task to resettle 300,000 refugees within a short period of 180 days. An impressive feat indeed by any standard and probably unmatched anywhere in the world. Yet, the Muslim IDPs from the 1990 eviction continued as a “forgotten people” until 2013.

Rishad Bathiudeen, the then Minister of Resettlement, could not resettle a single Muslim IDP of the 1990 eviction during the period 2009 to 2013. He too is an IDP who was forced to live in IDP camps in Puttalam when the LTTE evicted them in 1990.

It is unfortunate that the present President, who was elected by almost 98% of the Muslims and voting him to office, is betraying the IDPs of this community. Close to a million Muslim voters probably cast their vote for him. The map shows the voting pattern for Mahinda Rajapaksa and Maithripala Sirisena in January 2015. Today, Buddhist extremists have misled him to target the Muslim community through various acts of racism.

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa supported the Bodu Bala Sena from behind the scenes. President Sirisena supports them openly; giving them the same prominence as the most respected Mahanayakes and other religious leaders.
untitled-5

Why are Muslim IDPs being targeted?

Why do the Government, media, Buddhist extremists and some environmentalists target the Muslim IDPs? Is this how an elected President governs a democracy where all citizens have equal rights? To use his own words, he may not be among the living if he had lost the presidential elections in January 2015. Then does he not owe his life to the Muslims? Why is he conniving with extremists to take the life of the innocent IDPs of the Northern Province?

The Northern IDP resettlement has been a controversial issue since 2009. The Government and international agencies prioritised the resettlement of the Tamils. During the same period, unknown to many, 2,860 families were brought from Suriyawewa and Hambantota in the Southern Province and settled in the most recent colonisation programme. They were provided over 5,000 acres of virgin forest land, infrastructure including schools and hospitals were built, grants provided for their settlement, etc.

While these environmentalists, Buddhist extremists and the President are protesting against the Muslim IDPs returning to their own lands for which they have title deeds dating back to over 100 years and permits given by the Government, there has been organised colonisation along the Wilpattu Reserve on the Welioya road by Sinhalese from Hambantota, Suriyawewa and families of armed forces personnel. The following are the available statistics for the Sinhala settlements:

Veratenna – 520 families, Bogaswewa 1- 500 families, Bogaswewa 2 -560 families, Namalgama – 470 families, Senaleenigama – 450 families, Nandamitragama -360 families

None of these settlers are from the area. These 2,860 families settled in the Wilpattu area have been provided with three acres of land for each family compared to half an acre for each Muslim family in the lands they lived before the forced eviction.

Where did the land for these new settlers come from? Large extents of virgin jungle and reservations had been cleared and handed over for the alien settlements, grants and allowances disbursed, and all other facilities including schooling have been provided by the State. Neither land kachcheris were held nor deforestation undertaken with proper approvals. It is also alleged that the Army built the houses for these new settlers from Hambantota and elsewhere. Further, over 500 acres of land have been taken over by the Navy for cashew plantation.


Where will these IDPs go? 

Basil Rajapaksa, as the Head of the Task Force for Northern Resettlement, started partial resettlement of the Muslim IDPs in 2013. Approximately 5,000 families of the 25,000 IDP families were allowed to return to their own lands, or allocated land by the Divisional Secretariat of Musali in the Mannar District.

The Muslims have title deeds dating back to 1906 and issued under the seal of King Edward. The President›s latest tryst with the racists will deprive these IDPs of resettling in their former homes. Where will these IDPs go?

They have gone and cleared land that they lived in before their displacement in 1990. During their displacement of over 25 years, there has been jungle growth and these people have cleared those shrubs. This is shown by media using drone cameras (filmed from 200 to 300 meters above ground) as jungles being cleared by the Muslim IDPs. These journalists know the truth, but they dance to the tune of their racist employers and extremist handlers.

The Government in 2012 declared most of the land as forestland just prior to the Provincial Council Elections for the Northern Province. They undertook this fearing that these lands will come under the jurisdiction of the Northern Provincial Council and that they will have the right to these lands if they didn›t belong to the Central Government, as all forest reserves come under the Central Government. It is alleged that even the Divisional Secretaries of these areas were not aware of this mapping until it was gazetted. This Cabinet decision has not been ratified by the Parliament; hence experts say it is not legally valid.


Environmental concerns

Environmental concerns have been cited for the current exercise of depriving the Muslim IDPs of their land. However, the Government has agreed to provide 15,000 acres to China to develop in Hambantota. Will they not cut down virgin forestland if the land is uninhabited as the Government claims? How many acres did the Government clear for the Suriyawewa Cricket Stadium and Mattala Airport projects?

If development takes place for a country›s citizens, then shouldn›t all its citizens be treated justly and equally first? Don›t all citizens have a right to return to their home? It is not to say that environmental concerns should be ignored; the environment certainly has to be protected. But courting environment to mete injustice to a segment of Sri Lanka›s citizens is deplorable.

The Muslims voted Sirisena not because they trusted him, but were convinced that an UNP Government under Ranil Wickremesinghe›s premiership would not be racist. Today, they have been proved wrong and it is up to the Prime Minister to convince President Sirisena that he is courting disaster with his ultra-racist policies. Failure would mean another 20 years in opposition for the United National Party. The winner would be the JVP because it is unlikely that the Muslims will ever trust the Rajapaksa clan.

Resettlement Of Muslim IDPs & Issues Of Wilpattu


Colombo Telegraph
Dr. Mohamed Shareef Asees
Dr. Mohamed Shareef Asees
By Mohamed Shareef Asees –January 5, 2017
It has been 27 years since the Muslims were forcibly evicted from the Northern Province by the LTTE and have been living in the Puttalam district in many IDP camps in vulnerable conditions. The end of conflict in May 2009 brought a new hope for the resettlement of Muslim IDPs. However both the Sri Lankan government and international community prioritized the Tamil IDPs for resettlement and sidelined the Muslim IDPs from it. This has led some Muslim IDPs to go back to their places of origin voluntarily. The former Resettlement Minister, Rishard Bathiudeen was able to negotiate with some Islamic organizations and they agreed to provide some houses for this marginalized Muslim IDPs. In 2012, Muslims in Marichukatti in Mannar district began their resettlement process with the support of Qatar foundation. Since then some Buddhist monks and media groups began to accuse their resettlement and claimed it was an illegal act and violation of Wilpattu national forest. From the Muslims point of view, these are the lands where they lived over 100 years even before the conflict start and they hold their deeds (legal documents) to prove the ownership and right to live in their own place.
The prolonged armed conflict which started in 1983 between the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE killed around 90,000 people and left over 1 million IDPs from three ethnic groups: Tamils 82%, Muslims 14%, and Sinhalese 4% (UNHCR Report. 2009). In 1990, the LTTE forcibly evicted around 15,000 Muslim families from the Northern Province in five districts: Jaffna 3,475, Mannar 8,200, Vavuniya 1,800, Mulaitheevu 1,000 and Kilinochi 525 (Ibid. 2009). The displaced Muslims moved mainly to the Puttalam district and have been living there as IDPs since then. The IDP camp life is very pathetic and they have been facing various problems in their daily lives. The life in IDP camps have de-moralized men, women, children and elderly people and affected them physically, psychologically, socially, economically and educationally.wilpattu
Photograph was taken by the author, this is an ancient Mosque built in 1938 located in Marichukatti but presently within the reserved forest boundary.
The end of conflict in May 2009, brought a new hopes for the resettlement of Muslim IDPs, but the Sri Lankan government and the international community prioritized the Tamil IDPs and side lined the Muslim IDPs from the resettlement process. This has led some Muslim IDPs voluntarily to go back to their homes. The former Resettlement Minister Rishard Bathiudeen was able to negotiate with some Islamic organizations and they agreed to provide some houses for this marginalized Muslim IDPs. In 2012 Muslims in Marichukatti began their resettlement process with the support of Qatar foundation (Al-JASSIM). Since then some Buddhist monks and media groups began to accuse their resettlement and claimed it was an illegal resettlement and violation of Willpattu forest, though the Muslims hold their deeds to live in their own place. The issue is little complicated and not many understand what exactly happens in Wilpattu.

Sri Lanka: Then they Started Smuggling Gold under “Yahapalanaya”


( January 4, 2017, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Police intelligence has found that a powerful government minister and his brother who are involved in smuggling gold to India.

The duo had been accused of being engaged in a land grabbing racket as well, sources said.

According to available information, the Minister has been using vehicles belonging to his ministry to transport gold to the airport. It was sent to India by both air and sea.

The gold taken to the airport in official vehicles were handed over to an intermediary at the BIA, the police said.

The duo and a Pettah businessman involved in the racket had to face a massive loss after the Navy took the gold into custody some time ago.

Following the detection, the businessman had been compelled to sell a building of his in Pettah to make up for the loss, the intelligence sources said.

Two more SLFP ministers to join Rajapakses -Transpires at New Year party discussion

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -03.Jan.2017, 8.40PM) On the 8 th of January 2017 , that is on the completion of the  second year of the term of office of president Maithripala Sirisena ,  another two ministers are to give up their portfolios ,in order  to join the Rajapakse group . More ministers of the SLFP team numbering 8 have also planned to cross over in the new year . These  discussions were  held during a New year dinner at a SLFP “leader’s” house.
It was discussed at the dinner that the attacks launched on  the consensual agreement  , the Prime Minister and the UNP by dividing  the government  by the  two penny half penny bankrupt politicos Dilan Perera and Isura Devapriya  should be stopped  forthwith.
While  boozing  before the  dinner  in  a house in the vicinity of the Diyawanna the discussion was held . The SLFP minister to whom the residence belongs said , before forming an SLFP government in 2020, it is essential the consensual government continues until 2020.
It was his view , prior to the resignation of ministers who are going to join   with the Rajapakses , their portfolios should be given up. In addition , the actions of Dilan and the retaliatory moves of the UNP should not be permitted to continue  ,and with this in view swiftly discussions shall be had with the president . Others too concurred in his view.
It was also revealed at the discussion ,’no matter what , the world only recognizes the politician, Ranil Wickremesinghe and not our president . This is the bitter truth  , and the world was impressed with us because of this.’
One leader of the SLFP who attended the dinner pointed out there is some truth in what Lanka e news had revealed that if the consensual government breaks up the president will fall into the laps of the Rajapakses , and ‘there is no one who knows its repercussions  better than us’  he had highlighted.
.
The wife of the minister who was providing the dinner had also joined  in the discussion, and expressed ‘fair’ views. Based on her evaluation ,  every one who sacrifices his ministry post and joins the Rajapakse group shall be paid Rs. 100 million . That payment will be made by a foreign diplomatic mission office of an Asian country  in Sri Lanka .
---------------------------
by     (2017-01-03 15:05:24)