Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, December 29, 2016

Karu launches ‘cancer relief phone service’ (hotline) and dedicates to his late daughter


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -28.Dec.2016, 11.30PM)  Anybody who is informed  that himself/herself or somebody close to him/her has contracted cancer , nothing can be more  unbearable or sorrowful news. Such a victim no matter how rich or poor faces hardships under those difficult and uneasy circumstances is unable to  decide what should and should not be done. In such a dire situation an advisory service is most essential and gladly it is such a service that is  coming into being from 27 th December 2016 . This service begun on 27 th December (Tuesday) , and can be contacted from that day .
The service  under the name of ‘cancer relief contact Number ‘ aims at providing   medical counseling , treatment ,as well as psychological and physical assistance  to the victims . This emergency  contact service has been launched  by speaker Karu Jayasuriya and his family members jointly with the Cancer relief association  , and is the outcome of their efforts. 
This service ceremonially started  at 11.45 a.m. at 45 /B in the vicinity of Apeksha hospital , Maharagama . Speaker Karu Jayasuriya , health minister Rajitha Senaratne the chiefs of the Cancer relief association will be attending  the function .The  husband (British national ) Martin Dicker of late Indira Jayasuriya who recently died of cancer in England , and their  two children will also  specially  participated in this ceremony. 
The first phase of this project comprising three programs is the cancer relief phone service . The mobile diagnosis service which covers the examination of symptoms of breast cancer  in women, and Indra Jayasuriya  children’s health support  service too  to treat children suffering from cancer are  to be inaugurated shortly. 
Theohone number of the  cancer relief phone service is ..

Phone : 011 2363211

---------------------------
by     (2016-12-29 00:10:26)

What can we do?



article_image 

The above is the plaintive cry heard of a populace, driven to hopeless desperation by the ongoing succession of events in our land. Frustration almost justifies the question whether "the cure is worse than the disease". The promise of January 8 , 2016 has ushered a colossal let down. No amount of pious posturing and flippant dismissal of deeply-felt pain and disappointment will do. It is unnecessary to labour the point that virtually all of the spectacular disclosures of corruption and other misdeeds fed to us was blatant lying or distortion. Dishonesty and bluff are sadly, very much what has to be expected. Soon, one fears, silent acceptance may no longer be possible and deteriorate into unpleasant reaction.

Every single government since Independence - and it has been a regular change of tenancy - has been far short of promise and fulfillment. Statesmen have been as sorely lacking as are vitally needed. The first Government at Independence carried away with it all decency, standards and class. Name any of the successors and even some semblance of rectitude is hard to find. The record has been uniformly dismal.

Change of crew, has on past experience been useless. Once venality is practiced, it becomes ingrained. The possibility of a reshuffling of the pack rekindles the fear that history will repeat. As so tellingly encapsulated in "Unuth ekai, munnuth ekai"!

What then can we do? For a Reform within the present electoral system, where corruption and dishonesty are of prime value nothing short of fundamental awakening of the electorate to change their mindset and criteria of evaluation may be necessary.

Two recent events suggest that such a re-awakening may just be possible. The "Gammedda Dina Seeya Programme" and the "Trail Walk'', to me, offer great signs of hope. The former showed the effectiveness of self help when modestly catalysed and imaginatively led. The latter showed public admiration of selfless devotion and compassion. Both showed the powers of virtue and sympathy for fellow Sri Lankans. Both showed that there is a way outside of cheaply selfish politics. Concurrently were the moves to increase astronomically, the perks and privileges of MPP, the attempts to cover up cases of fraud and impropriety, diluted by the diversions of a giant tree, a promised Constitution, neither of which can be expected to attract a mass , obsessed as they are with the harsh existential realities. They are irrelevancies as also the contortions of new flower buds and self-centered efforts to secure or preserve privilege, dressed with an orgy of floral offerings, puja visits, Atapirikara and flower trays. They are insufferably boring and irrelevant.

We are a people in search of a decent system of governance, untainted by the squalor of what prevails. This country is not short of talent, ability and promise. Objectivity and incorruptibility should embellish competence. Can civil society give thought to evolving a minimal curriculum vitae, to be activated and popularized with urgency. Posturings and pretended purity are insufficient. Clarity of such a message is urgent and should replace the groans and moans of a distraught and disillusioned nation.

May Peace and contentment decorate the coming Year for us all!

Dr U.Pethiyagoda

What Did 2016 Bring?


Nationalism is another global trend that raised its head during the year where people were in serious search of their national identity and their historical rights viewed against the influx of foreigners who were “taking away” jobs that were rightfully belonging to the former.

by Dr. Ruwantissa Abeyratne-Dec 29, 2016

( December 29, 2016, Montreal, Sri Lanka Guardian) Most of the commentaries one hears about retrospective looks at 2016 consist of what we have heard over and over: populism has been the trend the world over – Brexit and Donald Trump’s victory; The vote by Italians who rejected a referendum which precipitated the exit of the Prime Minister (the reason for which is wrongly attributed to populism whereas the referendum was perceived by the Italian public as restricting democracy and the democratic institution); the ongoing misery in Syria; Iraq, Libya Yemen and some African States bringing about a refugee crisis not seen since world war 2; and sporadic terror attacks in Europe. Not much is said about the reasons for these trends and occurrences.

Populism grew because of rising inequality which has been identified as the defining feature of our times. This exponential rise in inequality has in turn been attributed to two decades of failed liberal governance where western governments have been boosting the markets instead of developing and pumping money into economies. Italy’s crisis was purely a result of the rejection of perceived concentration of power in one individual. The misery in Syria and other places mentioned was because of ineptitude of the West in not nipping off in the bud the autocracy of certain villainous dictators. No doubt the refugee crisis is a corollary of this feckless insouciance. Sporadic terror attacks in Europe were the result of a combination of bad intelligence gathering, inadequate anticipatory intelligence and the displacement of terrorism to soft targets.

Nationalism is another global trend that raised its head during the year where people were in serious search of their national identity and their historical rights viewed against the influx of foreigners who were “taking away” jobs that were rightfully belonging to the former.

The above notwithstanding, hyper-connectivity was the most pervasive agent of change in 2016. The year personified the changing nature of power from the world of big government and commerce to the individual, where individual empowerment was a key driver. This was brought about by a technology revolution which relentlessly bombarded the 12 months of 2016, making education the key factor that kept on increasing the numbers of the middle class. Corollaries of this trend made artificial intelligence (AI) boom with such innovations as Google’s DeepMind and Tesla’s self-driving and self navigating cars. If DeepMind could beat any human being at Go (a more complicated game than Chess) one could wonder how AI could recommend better procedures for surgeries than human medical specialist and technologists can ever concoct with their collective minds. IBM’s Watson (a super computer which could read millions of academic articles in a few minutes and synthesize solutions) came into the limelight in 2016, bringing to bear the immense possibilities that technology would offer in the future.

There were also signs of decreasing inequality in emerging markets coupled with increasing mobility. Big data analysis took a huge leap forward in 2016, an example being applications such as “hopper” which gives the air traveller the best air fares to reach his destination through a search of 3 billion airfare combinations. However, a Global Economic Forum (GEF) study released in mid 2016 pointed out that individuals are beginning to lose trust in how governments are handling meta data which was seemingly a threat to their privacy rights. The solution put forward by the GEF is to set up “living labs” to test potential new regulations for rights and responsibilities of the individual. This solution portends a dilemma for China as a Rand study pointed out that a dichotomy exists where China’s future development depends on global internet connectivity which in turn is stymied by China’s own circumscription of the internet. Meanwhile, a McKenzie Study reported that the internet would increase in real GDP per capita of $ 500 on average in the next 15 years.

2016 also saw massive improvements in medicine, guaranteeing better health and extended longevity. Jobs created in 2016 outnumbered those destroyed and “digitization” – the mass adoption of connected digital services by consumers, enterprises and governments – provided billions of dollars to boost world economic output. Greater independence of the individual resulted through globalization. There were also emergent game changes for the future: the growing possibility of war (particularly regionally); new technologies; and the ambiguity presented by global politics that wavered from left to right.

Global environmental protection took a more optimistic turn with the Paris Agreement – an agreement within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) dealing with greenhouse gases emissions mitigation, adaptation and finance starting in the year 2020. The language of the agreement was negotiated by representatives of 195 countries at the 21st Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC in Paris and adopted by consensus on 12 December 2015. It was opened for signature on 22 April 2016 (Earth Day) in a ceremony in New York City. This Agreement, which came into effect in 2016 sought to limit the global average temperature to well below 2 degrees Celsius and to proceed toward limiting that increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius. On 5 October 2016, the threshold for entry into force of the Paris Agreement was achieved. The Paris Agreement entered into force on 4 November 2016. The first session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement (CMA 1) took place in Marrakech, Morocco from 15-18 November 2016.

Finally, a political “bombshell” was dropped in the United Nations Security Council on 23 December where the Security Council adopted Resolution 2334 relating to Israeli settlements in “Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem”. The Resolution, which was passed with the support of 14 of the 15 members of the Council with the United States – which has veto power – abstaining, states that Israel′s settlement activity constitutes a “flagrant violation” of international law and has “no legal validity”, and demands that Israel stop such activity and fulfill its obligation as an occupying power under the Fourth Geneva Convention. Israel responded to this condemnation by blaming the United States for failing to block the Council resolution, among other more serious allegations to the effect that the Resolution was orchestrated by the United States.

Although the Resolution is non-binding and does not have an immediate compelling effect on Israel, it leaves a strong flavor of political discord among two allies. As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel said: “friends do not take friends to the Security Council”. It is a fact that legal validity cannot be ascribed to UN Resolutions as they are merely the result of political compromises and arrangements. However, this leads up to an inauspicious and tense start to 2017. As the age old Chinese curse says: “may you live in interesting times”. Viewed in this context 2017 might well be “interesting”.

Chandra Jayaratne Wants Eran To Practice What He Preaches


Colombo Telegraph
December 29, 2016 
Good governance activist, Chandra Jayaratne has called on Deputy Minister of Public Enterprise Development, Eran Wickramaratne to practice what he preaches. In an open letter, Jayaratne recalling the deputy minister’s recent statement that the Government is open to discuss suggestions; and following such submissions ready to take reform action, congratulated the deputy minister on his announcement and reiterated that this was the ‘fervent expectations’ of the citizens who voted in the Yahapalanaya Government.
Chandra Jayaratne
Chandra Jayaratne
The letter dated on December 25 said that the civil society implores that the deputy minister take steps to review several suggestions and take timely positive governance based reform action with transparency, abiding by the aforesaid principles committed to by the government in its 2015 election manifestos.
Jayaratne also called on Wickramaratne to establish a parallel Court System dedicated to hear corruption related cases.
The good governance activist highlighted seven areas, which he urged the deputy minister to review, they were;
1. Review and publicly debate the presumptive three alternative scenarios of governance open to the government, as articulated recently by Dr. Razeen Sally( refer article attached )and take timely reform action to assure a future filled with peace, ethno religious harmony and sustainable macro economic growth and stability, whereby citizens can enjoy the benefits of equity, inclusiveness and prosperity, as residents of this independent non aligned nation.
2. In the context of recently reported incidents and unacceptable public announcements by some members of the government and some leading members of the Executive, take immediate steps to uphold the freedom of expression and the right to information of citizens, facilitated by effectively activated and duly empowered independent public institutions especially set up for that purpose. As a priority inform the public of any pending challenges in the power sector.
3. As a follow up to the process of selection by the Constitutional Council of designated public officials and members of public institutions, either expand the scope and terms of reference of the said Constitutional Council or establish an adjunct body with independence and capability to select other key high office holders including but not limited to the following;
a. All Secretaries of Ministries
b. All Chief Accounting Officers
c. All Heads of Departments
d. The Governor and members of the Monetary Board
e. The Heads of and the Senior Deputies of the Armed Forces and the Police
f. The Chairpersons and members of all Regulatory bodies and Institutions
g. All persons appointed as Ambassadors and High Commissioners
h. All persons appointed to represent Sri Lanka in International bodies including the bodies administered by United Nations, International Financial Institutions etc
i. Chair persons and Council Members of Universities, Vocational Educations Institutions, and Research Institutions
j. Chairpersons and members of State Banks and Banks Controlled by the State
k. Chairpersons and members of the Boards of State Corporations and State Owned Enterprises
l. Members of all Commissions of Inquiry and Advisory Committees appointed for Policy Development, Policy Implementation Oversight and Policy Reforms
4. Take urgent steps to expand the scope, coverage and accountability of the Code of Best Practice in Corporate Governance for State Owned Public Enterprises ( reference ) incorporating new/revised provisions suggested in the attached schedule.
5. Establish parallel Court Systems dedicated to hear corruption related cases, with daily hearings to a finish, operating on a two shift basis (9 a.m.- 1.30 p.m. and 2.30 p.m.to 7 p.m.) facilitated by electronic interfaces and communications, where evidence, network facilitations and witness connectivity will be enabled via remote access information communications technology options – Refer an Indian example:
6. In order to provide a conducive environment to progress on a timely basis, the cases covering serious financial and other crimes currently pending successful judicial proceedings resulting in the optimal recovery of proceeds of crime, introduce an incentive scheme, whereby a percentage of proceeds of crimes and fines collected (say 20%) is pooled to be distributed to improve the infrastructure facilities, capability of human resources, and welfare as well as a special performance bonuses of those public servants engaged in investigations, prosecution and allied services.
Taped conversation between Lasantha and MR - It’s twists and turns


2016-12-28
With last week’s release of a taped conversation between the Editor of The Sunday Leader Lasantha Wickrematunge and former President Mahinda Rajapakse, there has been a buzz of speculation as to who released the tape and why the tape was released at this particular time. The contents of the tape, the tone and manner of the conversation and the relationship between the two has been dissected and analysed by media pundits and the public alike but all questions are yet unanswered and the emergence of the tape remains a mystery.   


3942

Hopper host!
Hoppers became part of local political lore when former President Mahinda Rajapaksa mocked his successor Maithripala Sirisena for sharing a meal of the Lankan delicacy with him the night before joining ranks with the Opposition. In that context, it was interesting to see Rajapaksa savouring hoppers with foreign correspondents yesterday during their meeting. This will no doubt be the talk of the town in days ahead

Former Sri Lankan president Mahinda Rajapaksa addresses foreign media at a press event in Colombo yesterday - AFP
43By Dharisha Bastians

By Dharisha Bastians-Friday, 30 December 2016

logoFormer president Mahinda Rajapaksa yesterday vowed to make it his mission to topple the National Unity Government and regain power in 2017, nearly two years after he was ousted in a shocking election upset.

During a meeting with Colombo-based foreign correspondents, the former President said that even though the National Unity Government currently held a two thirds majority, that balance of power could shift given the current political climate.

“They are fighting with each other. It can’t go on like this. It is bad for the country,” Rajapaksa told reporters at his official residence at Wijerama Mawatha in Colombo yesterday.

Ironically, the old colonial residence was President Maithripala Sirisena’s ministerial residence when he served as Rajapaksa’s Health Minister. For several months following his election, President Sirisena continued to operate out of his old residence. When Sirisena was the occupant of the Wijerama Mawatha residence, portraits of communist icons Karl Marx and Lenin hung on the walls.

The new occupancy has brought a new set of portraits, all of them featuring the ex-President and the former first family. Even the tea sets are emblazoned with images of a kurahan saatakaya – Rajapaksa’s signature maroon shawl.

Seated at the head of the table, looking casual in a checked shirt and handloom sarong at his first meeting with foreign correspondents since his defeat two years ago, the former President expressed supreme confidence in his ability to tip the political scales in the coming year.

“When I said I would defeat Prabhakaran I did it. I have the same confidence here,” he says, referring to his ambition to overthrow the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe Government.

But many political analysts feel that Rajapaksa’s only path to power was through reconciliation with President Sirisena which could then result in his appointment or election as prime minister of a SLFP-led Government.

At the moment the two appear to be at loggerheads. President Sirisena recently slammed the former President for sowing racism and mobilising support against the new constitution that his Government hopes will deliver on a political settlement to ethnic strife that has spanned six decades.




Rajapaksa meanwhile blamed President Sirisena for forcing him back into active politics. “This man started attacking me from 9 January,” he told reporters referring to President Sirisena, “I ignored him for two months but then I had to begin to respond. I had to come back to politics because of the way he was treating me.”

But asked if he could work with President Sirisena if he managed to craft a path to the premiership, the former President retorted that he had known the current SLFP leader since 1970. “Now, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe is working with him. He (Sirisena) was with me for many years,” he explained.

US, India, RAW blamed for defeat

Corruption, nepotism and his failure to reconcile the country after ending a 26-year civil war were the main criticisms against his Government.

But according to former President Rajapaksa, his defeat was caused fundamentally due to meddling from the United States and India. “We couldn’t match the opposition campaign, with the Americans, Indians and RAW coming in,” he explained.

He also attributes his electoral losses in 2015 to a mutiny inside his own Government.

“We didn’t know what was going on inside our party,” Rajapaksa reflected now, two years later.

Since he lost the presidency nearly two years ago, Rajapaksa has consistently blamed the Indian spy agency RAW and Western countries for supporting his challenger.

Delhi’s ‘double standards’ and opposition to Chinese deal on Hambantota

He also seemed irked at what he claimed were New Delhi’s double standards on the Sri Lankan Government’s proximity to China.

Rajapaksa said he had been “shouted at” by Indian diplomats and officials over his burgeoning ties to Beijing, and specifically with regard to the docking of a Chinese submarine at the Colombo Harbour in 2014. But when confronted with a similar nexus with China under the new administration, New Delhi was being as “quiet as a mouse”, he claimed.

The former leader said the Indian Government was not reacting the same way to the new Government’s plans to lease a strategic harbour and 15,000 acres of land for an industrial park to a Chinese company in Hambantota, even insinuating that New Delhi had been promised something in exchange for its patience.

“They also must be getting something. I don’t know whether the Trincomalee Harbour is going to them or Palaly and Kankesanthurai,” he said referring to ports and airports in the Northern and Eastern Provinces.

Hambantota is the former President’s hometown, where his Government constructed an airport, a port and an international convention centre using loans from Beijing. But now he expresses fears about his hometown being dominated by China.

“This is the people’s land, no other Government would give this much land to a foreign company,” he charged.

Since the enactment of the 19th Amendment, Rajapaksa, who has held office for two terms, is no longer eligible serve as President of Sri Lanka. In his fresh bid for power, he could only seek to establish himself as the country’s Prime Minister, but the 19th Amendment has also made it impossible to declare fresh elections for Parliament before 2019 at the earliest. Under the circumstances, political analysts say the former President’s only path to power lies in a major reconfiguration in the balance of power in Parliament.

Given the prevailing tensions in the ruling coalition, such a reconfiguration was not entirely implausible, according to political analyst Kumudu Kumara, who is a senior lecturer at the Department of Sociology at the University of Colombo. “As the cold war between the UNP and the SLFP heats up, the possibility of a fully SLFP Government being formed in 2017 is not entirely far-fetched,” he explained.

Third force?

Rajapaksa told reporters yesterday that a politician did not need to be president to rule a country. Even staking a claim for premiership was “not a main concern”, he claimed. As he plots his comeback in 2017 and beyond, the former President says he will begin his political campaign with agitations over the new Government’s privatisation plans and financial mismanagement, targeting local government elections scheduled for next year.

The Podujana Peramuna, a new political party led by former Foreign Minister and Rajapaksa loyalist Prof. G.L. Pieris, who is President Rajapaksa’s former Foreign Minister, has announced it will contest the local council polls and nurses hope that the former President will take up the mantle of leadership in the new party.

“This party is just an avenue for President Rajapaksa to come and play a leading role. It is his party – no one else’s,” said Pieris who was also present at the press interaction yesterday.

But for the moment, the former President remains a member of the SLFP led by President Sirisena. Yet for months, he has been threatening to lead an alternative political movement to defeat the ruling coalition. The SLFP, Rajapaksa says, is just an appendage of the UNP now. “The Podujana Peramuna is where the true SLFP resides and we are confident our party members will come home,” Pieris, who was seated next to Rajapaksa at the meeting, told journalists.

But according to analysts, unless the SLFP put its differences aside and face local government elections as a single entity, its current fractured status could benefit archrival UNP.

Without a rapprochement between the feuding factions of the SLFP, mass support for even a Rajapaksa-led alternative to the SLFP was doubtful, says Kumudu Kumara of the Colombo University.

While Rajapaksa could be a force to be reckoned with if he leads a third party in forthcoming elections, this does not necessarily ensure his return to power, other observers also note.

Dr. Nishan De Mel, Executive Director of the Colombo-based think-tank Verite Research, says Mahinda Rajapaksa was creating what might become the most significant third force in Sri Lankan politics. “It can permanently change Sri Lanka’s political dynamic, but at the moment, he is not in a position to make a comeback as President or Prime Minister of the country,” Dr. De Mel added.

Yet with the shine wearing off the ‘Yahapalanaya’ Government as it struggles with growing unpopularity and public discontent, poor economic management and the failure to curb corruption within its own ranks, Mahinda Rajapaksa believes his moment may come in 2017.

“The people are with me. I know that whenever I go out. I can see that. I feel it.”

Protest march against non-payment of compensation for those affected by Uma Oya project has commenced

 by

The massive agitation and the protest march organized by the ‘People’s Front against Uma Oya multi – Destructive Project’ against the failure of the government to pay compensation appropriately to the people who have been affected drastically due to the ‘multi destructive’ Uma Oya project that has severely affected the eastern slopes of the central hills and the socio- economic affairs of the people living in the area has commenced.

Representatives of political parties, mass organizations, artistes, environmentalists, university teachers and large crowds are participating.

The businessmen in Badulla town have closed their establishments to support the protest movement.

uma1
h
uma3uma2
uma8uma7
uma6uma5

One Belt And One Road Initiative Of China & Its Implications In Sri Lanka


Colombo Telegraph

By Mohamed Shareef Asees –December 29, 2016
Dr. Mohamed Shareef Asees
Dr. Mohamed Shareef Asees
One Belt and One Road (OBOR) initiative has become the centerpiece of China’s economic diplomacy in the recent years. The essence of OBOR is to promote regional and cross-continental connectivity between China and other developing countries. The ‘One Belt’ and ‘One Road’ refer to China’s proposed ‘Silk Road Economic Belt’ and ‘Maritime Silk Road’. Connectivity covers five major areas of interest: Policy coordination, infrastructure construction (including railways and highways), unimpeded trade, financial integration and people-to-people ties. Among these, infrastructure construction is the dominant feature of the New Silk Road. It is reported that the proposed OBOR has connected around 78 countries from East (Philippines) to West (Europe). The OBOR is not only benefit to China but also central to other developing countries where it connects all countries physically and make economic cooperation with them.
Although the OBOR has started in 2013, it has over 2000 years history. China’s imperial envoy Zhang Qian who was a Chinese diplomat who served as an imperial envoy to the world outside of China during the 2nd century helped to establish the Silk Road (A network of trade routes that linked China to Central Asia and the Arab world). The name came from one of China’s most important exports—silk. And the road itself influenced the development of the entire region for hundreds of years.
In 2013, China’s president, Xi Jinping, proposed establishing a modern equivalent, creating a network of railways, roads, pipelines, and utility grids that would link China and Central Asia, West Asia, South Asia and parts of South East Asia. This initiative, One Belt and One Road (OBOR aims to create the world’s largest platform for economic cooperation, including policy coordination, trade collaboration and social & cultural cooperation. OBOR can be a economic platform to create benefits for everyone.
The State Council authorized an OBOR action plan in 2015 with two main components: The Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road (exhibit). The Silk Road Economic Belt is envisioned as three routes connecting China to Europe (via Central Asia), the Persian Gulf, the Mediterranean (through West Asia), and the Indian Ocean (via South Asia). The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road is planned to create connections among regional waterways. More than 60 countries, with a combined GDP of $21 trillion, have expressed interest in participating in the OBOR action plan.
The effort has already made some practical achievements. China has signed bilateral cooperation agreements related to the project with Hungary, Mongolia, Russia, Tajikistan, and Turkey. A number of projects are under way, including a train connection between eastern China and Iran that may be expanded to Europe. There are also new rail links with Laos and Thailand and high-speed-rail projects in Indonesia. China’s Ningbo Shipping Exchange is collaborating with the Baltic Exchange on a container index of rates between China and the Middle East, the Mediterranean, and Europe. More than 200 enterprises have signed cooperation agreements for projects along OBOR’s routes. Following map shows the various economic routes of China.one-belt-and-one-road-initiative-in-china
The Initiative aims to consolidate and upgrade existing infrastructure and build new transport routes to improve cross-border trade. It also includes efforts to promote a greater financial integration with foreign countries and create a “Digital Silk Road” of international communication and information distribution.  The “Silk Road Economic Belt” connects China via land with Central Asia, Russia, Europe and Southeast Asia. The “21st Century Maritime Silk Road” makes a link from the Indian Ocean, through the South China Sea to the South Pacific Ocean (see map). Geographically positioned in the middle of both the Belt and the Road, China has emerged as the facilitator in developing a connection between Europe and Asia. All roads lead to China; the Initiative has given major priority to infrastructure. Plans are already in place to build railway networks, port facilities, airports, highways and electronic communication networks to guarantee smoother and more efficient transportation of goods and people, from Southeast Asia to Western Europe.

Is Sarath Gunaratne in hiding in John Amaratunga’s home?

Is Sarath Gunaratne in hiding in John Amaratunga’s home?

Dec 29, 2016

Former deputy fisheries minister Sarath Gunaratne is in hiding in the home of tourism and Christian religious affairs minister John Amaratunga to escape arrest over charges of having defrauded Rs. 300 million from the Negombo lagoon development project, a reliable source reports to Lanka News Web.

Some days ago, Amaratunga sent a message to a topmost police official and asked that Gunaratne, a devoted Catholic, be allowed to remain free of harassment during Christmas.
 
The source also said that it was quite reasonable for the Christian religious affairs minister to make such a request, as he was concerned about the welfare of Catholics during Christmas.
 
All the suspects arrested in connection with this fraud have been released on bail due to the influence of top leaders of the SLFP, police sources say.
 
Several attempts to reach Amaratunga, who is friendly with the media, failed. If his media unit makes a response to this article, we are bound to publish it without any amendment.

Israel's Attorney General 'orders criminal investigation' against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

It comes after US Secretary of State John Kerry launched a blistering attack on Israel tonight



BY- 28 DEC 2016

Israel's Attorney General has ordered a criminal investigation against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, it has been reported.

The claims, from Israel's Channel 10, come the day after reports Netanyahu would be facing a probe into charges of bribery and fraud.

The Independent reports police have been looking into the allegations for almost nine months.

A Justice Ministry spokeswoman declined to respond to the report.

Netanyahu
Benjamin Netanyahu says he looks forward to working with Donald Trump

Netanyahu has in the past denied wrongdoing in the purchase of submarines from Germany, where media have reported a potential conflict of interest involving his lawyer.

The Channel 10 report said one of the two cases that Attorney-General Avihai Mandelblit had been examining was not known to the public.

The announcement comes after US Secretary of State John Kerry launched a blistering attack on Israel tonight as he warned there will never be peace in the Middle East without a Palestinian state.

In an outspoken speech given less than four weeks before he leaves office, President Obama’s foreign minister urged Israel to accept a two-state solution.

"If Israel goes down the one-state path it will never have peace with the Arab world - and I can say that with certainty," Mr Kerry said.
Kerry insisted the US "did vote with our values" by not blocking the UN resolution (Photo: Getty)

Hours earlier President-Elect Donald Trump had fired a warning shot across Secretary Kerry’s bows with a series of angry tweets urging Israel to “stay strong” in the face of US hostility.

Mr Trump was referring to the West’s controversial deal with Iran to end its nuclear weapons programme in return for lifting economic sanctions – fiercely opposed by Israel.

And Mr Trump slammed last Friday’s dramatic United Nations motion condemning Israeli settlements in Palestinian territory, on which the US abstained.
We cannot continue to let Israel be treated with such total disdain and disrespect. They used to have a great friend in the U.S., but.......
not anymore. The beginning of the end was the horrible Iran deal, and now this (U.N.)! Stay strong Israel, January 20th is fast approaching!
Mr Trump wrote: “We cannot continue to let Israel be treated with such total disdain and disrespect. They used to have a great friend in the US, but not anymore."

His tweet was warmly welcomed by Israel’s right-wing Netanyahu, who wrote back: “President-elect Trump, thank you for your warm friendship and your clear-cut support for Israel!”

But tonight – in what was an extraordinary outburst towards one of America’s long-standing allies - a fuming Mr Kerry accused Netanyahu of building a coalition which is “the most right-wing in Israeli history, with an agenda driven by the most extreme elements”.

And he insisted the US “did vote with our values” by deciding not to block the UN resolution.

He added: “Friends need to tell each other the hard truths" (Photo: REUTERS)

“If the choice is one state, Israel can either be Jewish or democratic,” Mr Kerry said. “It cannot be both.”
Mr Kerry also criticised Palestinian leaders' "incitement" of violence, acknowledging there were two sides to the argument.

And he stressed the US had been among Israel's greatest international allies.

But in a message aimed directly at the Israeli Government, he went on: “Let’s be clear: settlement expansion has nothing to do with Israel’s security.

"Many settlements actually increase the security burden on the Israeli defence forces.

“Some seem to believe that the US friendship means the US must accept any policy, regardless of our own interests, our own positions, our own words, our own principles - even after urging again and again that the policy must change.

“Friends need to tell each other the hard truths.”

Palestinian women fight to free a Palestinian boy held by an Israeli soldier
Palestinians and an Israeli soldiers in a dispute over territory on the West Bank (Photo: Getty)

He said some forces were "motivated by ideological elements" without regard for the Palestinian people and some settler outposts were “illegal under Israel’s own laws”.

In a pointed dig at Mr Trump, he urged leaders to "save the two state solution while there is still time".
And he said: "We cannot properly defend and protect Israel if we allow a viable two state solution to be destroyed before our own eyes.

"The vote in the UN was about preserving the two state solution. That was what we were standing up for."
Concluding his speech Mr Kerry said: "Is ours the generation that gives up the dream of the Jewish democratic state of Israel living in peace with its neighbours? Because that is what is at stake."

Palestine documentary stirs controversy in Germany

Emran Feroz-28 December 2016

People demonstrate. Israeli soldiers give chase. Sometimes they use lethal force. On the sidelines, Israeli settlers stand by, grinning under the protection of the soldiers.

It is just another day in Nabi Saleh, a small village in the central occupied West Bank, as captured in Even Though My Land is Burning, a new documentary by Israeli filmmaker Dror Dayan, who now lives in Berlin.

The film portrays the lives of Palestinian villagers under occupation and how some anti-Zionist Israeli Jews support their cause and their resistance. It shows how the organized resistance works in Nabi Saleh.
The choice of Nabi Saleh as the film’s focal point was deliberate. The village has been a center of unarmed resistance to Israel’s occupation for years now, but while it is just one small part of a bigger, more complicated picture, it is an important one, according to Dayan.

“Nabi Saleh is one model or case study out of many,” the filmmaker told The Electronic Intifada. “It shows what happens when people choose a certain kind of resistance and open their struggle to certain kinds of allies. But we mustn’t forget that the issue of Palestine is much broader than that. We all know that the situation in Gaza is not comparable to that of the West Bank. The same goes for some refugee camps outside the country.”

Dayan’s film doesn’t shy away from the bloody reality in Nabi Saleh. One of the young local residents featured disappears from one minute to the next. Only later does the audience learn that he was killed by the Israeli military.

Uncomfortable truths

Nor does the film shy away from uncomfortable truths. The involvement of children in village resistance proved challenging to western audiences. At screenings in Germany, where Dayan now lives, this was one recurring question: are children not instrumentalized by their community by joining in the resistance?

One young woman, during a question and answer session after a screening in Tübingen in southern Germany, put it this way: “It’s a bit weird to see all these children. Do they really want to do this?”

Dayan doesn’t flinch. “From the very first second of their lives, these children grew up under occupation. It’s natural for them to resist,” he told The Electronic Intifada.

His answer is reflected in the film. One man featured in Even Though My Land is Burning simply asserts, “Tomorrow’s resistance will be led by them.”

And among the Germans watching, Palestinians of a certain generation were puzzled by the questions focusing on children. “We live in different worlds,” 54-year-old Mahmoud, who has lived in Germany for more than 20 years, told me later. For him and many others, the resistance of Palestinian children is not just normal, it is necessary.

In the film, most of the protesters are from Nabi Saleh, but a few anti-Zionist Israeli Jews join the crowd. Dayan focuses on one of them, Ben Ronen, a young Israeli who has dedicated his activism to the Palestinian resistance. As a white, Jewish Israeli, he is well aware of his privileged role in the conflict. However, it also becomes very clear that Israeli society itself does not have much space for people like Ronen. As long as such people support the Palestinian struggle, they are always considered outsiders or traitors.

To leave or stay

It was important to Dayan, who is strongly anti-Zionist, to show that being against Zionism is not a matter of religion or ethnicity. He believes, he said, that every Israeli Jew has the option to decide to abandon Zionism.

“Ignorance is a choice,” Dayan said.

Dayan said anti-Zionist Israeli Jews, like those in his documentary, are often considered either traitors or simply insane in wider Israeli society. And with the success of the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, they are even seen as a self-hating fifth column.

He himself now lives in Berlin, having left Israel 11 years ago. He had been called up for military service, like most Israelis, but as an only child, he was not obligated to combat service, and he didn’t. Later, he also rejected reserve duty in the West Bank. Today, the 35-year-old Dayan says he would not join the military.

But despite that, he said, he doesn’t see his move to Germany as political. On the contrary.

“I don’t see my move to Germany as a political act – the political act would have been to stay and resist. I know that now.”

Portrait of young man wearing checkered traditional Palestinian scarf


Dror Dayan (Image courtesy of Dror Dayan)

He concedes he did not want to spend the rest of his life in a “militaristic” and “racist” society, but Germany was a practical choice. His grandfather was a German Jew who was forced to escape from Berlin when the Nazis came to power. On that background, Dayan was able to obtain German citizenship, an irony, he points out, considering Germany’s position on the Palestinian right of return.

“Germany is a big supporter of denying Palestinians their right of return. But I got my documents very quickly,” he said.

And his motivation to make the movie – which was also his final project for his master’s degree studies at the Babelsberg Konrad Wolf Film University in Potsdam – was in part informed by the political reality he found in Germany. For instance, he said, the Palestinian struggle and anti-Zionism are still seen negatively in Germany, even in left-leaning circles.

Criticism from the left

Before the first screening of Even Though My Land is Burning in Berlin in March, Dayan was criticized in several quarters, including personal smears from individuals mostly associated with the so-called Antideutsche (literally, anti-German), an extreme pro-Zionist neoconservative movement within the German left.

One such commentator even suggested since Dayan was an Israeli Jew, the film’s “anti-Semitism gets the kosher stamp,” suggesting also that making what he cast as an anti-Semitic film was the price Dayan had to pay for assimilation.

A demonstration was also organized and the Berlin cinema where the screening was taking place received several threats in the weeks before, warning that the cinema’s reputation would be destroyed and the playhouse would be branded anti-Semitic.

But the screening went ahead regardless, and Dayan said he believes he is luckier than others. Pro-Palestinian activists who are not Jewish face much harsher defamation, he said: there is still a certain line German Zionists will not cross when it comes to Jewish activists.

“It’s ridiculous. These people call themselves left while using slogans like ‘anti-fascism means solidarity with Israel,’” said Dayan. “The discourse in Germany, especially inside the left, is a big problem. For many of these so-called leftists, the bashing of pro-Palestinian activists is the only way to keep their political careers afloat.”

In his film, Dayan also devoted space to the one-state solution. It was important for him to bring up the issue, not in the sense of speaking on behalf of Palestinians or advocating this as the only solution, but to show audiences that a one-state solution is a vision shared by many and offers real prospects for justice.
“For many Germans, the one-state solution is still unthinkable,” Dayan said. “It contradicts the colonial idea of the Jewish state.”

And for all the difficulties he has encountered, Dayan also believes that the Palestine solidarity movement in Germany is heading in the right direction.

“The existence of Zionist colonialism in Palestine is a way for Germany to put its history behind it. That’s something that people here will not give up easily. But I think we are making progress.”

Emran Feroz is an Afghan-Austrian journalist currently based in Germany.

Editor’s note: an earlier version of this article stated that Dror Dayan was not obligated to serve in the Israeli military. It has been corrected to state that he was not obligated to combat service in the military.