Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, December 29, 2016

Blood and benefits: Duterte imposes his hometown formula on the Philippines

BROTHERS IN ARMS: Mayor Rodrigo Duterte inspects the assault rifle of police officer Ronald Dela Rosa (far left) in a village in the Davao area in 1997. After becoming president earlier this year, Duterte made Dela Rosa national police chief. REUTERS/Renato Lumawag

By Manny Mogato, Karen Lema, David Lague and Jerome Morales-Filed 

The president has brought the iron-fist approach he used to rule Davao to the capital Manila. While residents of the turbulent southern city sing his praises, his critics fear his violent drug crackdown threatens the nation's freedoms.

DAVAO – Rodrigo Duterte has kept his word.

“Forget the laws on human rights,” he declared in May at his final presidential campaign rally in Manila. “If I make it to the presidential palace, I will do just as I did as mayor. You drug pushers, hold-up men and do-nothings, you better go out. Because, I’d kill you.”

Head of Japan's top ad firm to quit after new recruit's death from overwork

President of Dentsu to step down a year after Matsuri Takahashi killed herself, sparking calls for Japan to overhaul work culture
Dentsu president Tadashi Ishii, centre, bows during press conference where he announced his resignation. Photograph: The Asahi Shimbun via Getty Images

 in Tokyo-Thursday 29 December 2016

The head of Japan’s biggest advertising agency is to resign, as prosecutors launch an investigation into his firm for enforcing excessive overtime after an overworked employee took her own life.

Tadashi Ishii, the president of Dentsu, said he would step down next month, just over a year after Matsuri Takahashi killed herself at a company dormitory in a case Japanese authorities classified as karoshi, or death from overwork.

“Excessive amounts of work is something that should never be allowed to happen,” Ishii told reporters. “I deeply regret and feel responsible for this. I will take full responsibility and resign as president at January’s board meeting.”

Ishii said he regretted his failure to tackle the company work practices that led to Takahashi’s death, eight months after joining Dentsu in April 2015. “We deeply regret failing to prevent the overwork of our new recruit. I offer my sincere apologies,” he said.

Takahashi, 24, had worked more than 100 hours of overtime a month leading up to her death. In September, a labour standards inspection office in Tokyo said she had been driven to kill herself due to stress brought on by long working hours.

Japan has spent years struggling to address karoshi. About 2,000 people a year kill themselves due to work-related stress, according to the government, while other victims die from heart attacks, strokes and other conditions brought on by spending too much time at work.

Weeks before she died on Christmas Day 2015, Takahashi posted on social media: “I want to die.” Another message read: “I’m physically and mentally shattered.”

Her death prompted calls for Japan to overhaul its work culture, which often forces employees to put in long hours of overtime as a demonstration of corporate loyalty.

Dentsu’s notoriously demanding work practices have long been the target of criticism and it was raided by regulators last month amid suspicions that it had broken labour standards law.

On Wednesday, the labour ministry referred the company and an unnamed Dentsu executive to prosecutors on suspicion of driving Takahashi to kill herself.

In response to criticism that it was doing too little to curtail excessive overtime, the firm started turning off the lights at 10pm at its Tokyo headquarters to encourage employees to go home.

In its first white paper on karoshi in October, Japan’s government said one in five workers were at risk of death from overwork. The paper found that despite attempts by some companies to establish a better work-life balance, Japanese workers still spend much longer hours in the office than their peers in other countries.

According to the paper, 22.7% of companies polled between December 2015 and January 2016 said some of their employees logged more than 80 hours of overtime each month – the official threshold at which the prospect of death from work becomes serious.

Japanese media said any overhaul of work practices should apply across the board. “The problem is not with Dentsu alone,” the Asahi Shimbun said in a recent editorial. The paper, which itself received a government warning about overtime this month, acknowledged that changing attitudes would be difficult but was essential as it affected employee morale and productivity.

Last week, on the first anniversary of her daughter’s death, Takahashi’s mother, Yukimi, said she hoped to “change the consciousness of every working person in Japan”.

Ichiro Oshima, a 24-year-old Dentsu employee, killed himself in 1991 in Japan’s first recognised case of karoshi-related suicide. Oshima had not had a day off for 17 months and was sleeping for less than two hours a night before his death.

In the UK, the Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123. In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Hotline is 1-800-273-8255. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is on 13 11 14. Hotlines in other countries can be found here

China: Northern provinces told to expect heavy smog over New Year


pollution in ChinaSmog billows from chimneys and cooling towers of a steel plant during hazy weather in Taiyuan, Shanxi province, China, Dec 28, 2016. Source: Reuters/Stringer
29th December 2016
CHINA’s environment ministry on Thursday warned northern regions to get ready for emergency action to tackle another bout of heavy smog expected over the New Year.
Large parts of the north were hit by hazardous smog in mid-December, and authorities ordered hundreds of factories to close and restricted motorists to cut emissions.
“Unfavourable weather” was expected to bring more smog to the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, as well as the neighbouring provinces of Shandong and Henan, the Ministry of Environmental Protection said in a notice.
Beijing has raised an orange alert for the period from Friday to Monday. An orange alert is the second-highest level in a four-tier pollution warning system.
The ministry said the bad weather was expected to last until Jan 5, and it had asked local governments to take appropriate action to reduce emissions.
It said it would send out 10 inspection teams to make sure emergency measures are implemented and to take action against firms engaging in “illegal behaviour”.
Public anger over pollution, and what many see as government talk but little action to stop it, is mounting in China. Worry about pollution has on occasion sparked protests.
A smog red alert in Beijing was cancelled on Dec 22. The next day, the ministry admonished more than 20 firms for failing to comply with emergency rules aimed at cutting emissions.
Hebei, regarded as China’s most polluted province, said it would learn lessons from last week’s smog and draw up more “focused measures”.
The province’s environment bureau said on Monday it would make adjustments to its emergency system to improve its performance.
In recent smog outbreaks, individuals and companies had not been given enough time to respond to pollution alerts, and warnings would now be issued sooner, said Wang Xiaoli, director of the province’s Heavy Pollution Early Warning Centre. – Reuters

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

IBS is a common functional disorder of the gut. A functional disorder means there is a problem with the function of a part of the body, but there is no abnormality in the structure. So, in IBS, the function of the gut is upset, but all parts of the gut look normal, even when looked at under a microscope. IBS causes various symptoms (listed below). Up to 1 in 5 people in the UK develop IBS at some stage in their life. IBS can affect anyone at any age, but it commonly first develops in young adults. IBS is slightly more common in women than it is in men.


Wednesday, December 28, 2016

Mannar fishermen protest Sri Lankan Navy obstruction

28 Dec  2016
Home
Fishermen of Thalvupada, Mannar, held a road-block protest against obstruction from the Sri Lankan Navy.
The fishermen were blocked from working by the navy and using their usual 'surukku' nets.

Liar, Liar, Pants On Fire! Gnanasara Tells The President Where The Problem Lies


Colombo Telegraph
By Mass L. Usuf –December 28, 2016 
Mass Usuf
Mass Usuf
“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.” ~ Adolph Hitler, a man who learned how to lie effectively.
This person Gnanasara (with my highest regard to those sincere and respectable monks) is incredible. How on earth, I wonder can a person in robe who everyday takes the pledge of pancha sila (the five virtues) and who also administers it to the laymen, utter blatant lies. The fourth of the five virtues states:
Musāvādā veramaṇī, sikkhā-padaṃ samādiyāmi.
I undertake to observe the precept to abstain from false speech (lying).
The Judaeo-Christian commandment is “Thou shalt not lie”. The Quran states: “…surely Allah does not guide him aright who is a liar, ungrateful.” (Chapter 39 Verse 3)
At a recent meeting with H.E. The President Maithripala Sirisena and several others, matters relating to the preservation of archaeological sites were discussed. At this meeting was also present Galagoda Atthe Gnanasara among the other members of the Buddhist clergy and Officials. The President said that the problem of archaeological preservation is not a new one and has been there for quite some time. He acknowledged that the Department of Archaeology could not provide adequate security because it is understaffed. He further said that it is necessary for the places especially in the North and East be given priority in addressing this issues.
Polowa Pelena Boru
Gnanasara who was also present at that meeting had this to say, among other things. This is the English translation.
“Have we ever harmed any mosque or kovil or any other place of worship in the South anywhere? The Tamil people very rarely lay their hands on an archaeological site. However, Muslims are not like that. For them, in their religious teachings it is instructed to destroy such places. That is where the problem is.”
In my view, this statement of Gnanasara clearly points to the:
  1. Continuation of his meaningless vitriolics against Muslims;
  2. The spreading of blatant lies about the religion of Islam;
  3. Providing false information with regard to no harm done to mosques and other places of worship.
The National Christian Evangelical Alliance of Sri Lanka (NCEASL) has documented 241 anti-Muslim attacks and 69 anti-Christian attacks in 2013. These include attacks on places of religious worship of the Christians and Muslims. Against Gnanasara himself there are around 40 Police complaints pending investigation in relation to his role in the Aluthgama riots. There are also several other complaints against him which are not related to Aluthgama.
His lie that Islam teaches Muslims to destroy archaeological sites is aptly describable using the Sinhala phrase, ‘polowa pelena boru’. I do not know the English equivalent of this. A literal translation, I guess, would be “earth sundering lies”.
Quran And Archaeology
Quran is rich with several references being made to history and archaeology. I wish to refer to one Quranic verse only which amply demonstrates the importance of archaeological sites.
“To every nation, We sent a Messenger who told its people: Worship Allah and shun false gods, idols. Then some of them God guided, and some were justly disposed to error. Do but travel in the land and see the nature of the consequence for those who rejected the truth!” (Chapter 16 Verse 36)
The implication of this verse is that to every nation a Messenger has been sent. For example, the advent of Prophet Abraham was around five thousand years ago. Obviously, predating even Buddhism. Such Messengers/Reformers appeared at different times and, to different peoples living in different regions. They had been sent with the message to worship Allah and shun other gods, idols.
If Islam instructs the Muslims to destroy archaeological sites, how can the Quran ask mankind to travel in the land and see the consequences of what had happened to the people who lived thousands of years ago? How can Gnanasara, sitting face to face with the President of this country, tell such humongous lies to the President of the nation that Islam teaches the Muslims to destroy archaeological sites?
Maraya/Satan
His success depends on people believing his lies. Lies ranging from the “little white lies” to huge, “pants-on-fire” lies to deceive the innocent and peace loving Sinhala people. Especially, the youth. Lying is Satan’s primary weapon against the people. He uses the tactic of deceit to influence people away from the truth. There is a beautiful description of Satan in the Bible, where speaking to a group of Jews, Jesus says,
“You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies” (John 8:44).
The Satan also “masquerades as an angel of light” or “the saviour”, so that what he says and does sounds good and seems reasonable. But it is nothing more than a false appearance and deceit.
“Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. It is not surprising, then, if his servants also masquerade as servants of righteousness.”
(2 Corinthians 11:14-15).
Gnanasara is a person who donned the robe to seek the path of enlightenment. Is he not aware of the Maraya (demon) who is described as “the personification of the forces antagonistic to enlightenment? (Thera, Nyanaponika (2008). The Roots of Good and Evil). Is he not aware of the three daughters of the Maraya identified as Taṇhā (Craving), Arati (Aversion/Discontentment), and Raga (Attachment/Desire/Greed/Passion)?

Muslims not discriminated against in Northern Province, says CV Wigneswaran


c

CV Wigneswaran. (File)
By P K Balachandran - 27th December 2016 07:53 
COLOMBO: The Chief Minister of Sri Lanka’s Tamil-majority Northern Province, C.V.Wigneswaran, has refuted an allegation made by Muslim leaders, that his administration is discriminating against the Muslims in the matter of post-war resettlement.
In a press statement issued on Tuesday, Wigneswaran said that among the 4307 families which had obtained lands between 2013 and 2016, 73.02 percent were Muslim, 25.66 percent were Tamil and 1.32 percent were Sinhalese.
Up to December 2015, 26,668 Muslim families had applied for resettlement. Out of these 24,040 families were resettled and 2801 families remained to be settled.
Out of the 2801 families to be resettled, 1570 are in Jaffna and 1231 are in Vavuniya. In Mannar which has always had a large proportion of Muslims, all those who sought resettlement had been resettled.
Wigneswaran pointed out that many Muslims had not applied for resettlement because they had settled in the South Sri Lankan district of Puttalam. If and when they apply they will be resettled in the North, he assured.
The Chief Minister said that he had explained this in his budget speech, but still thought it would be better to issue a special press statement to clear lingering misapprehensions.
Earlier, the Chief Minister had objected to the Central government in Colombo appointing a special committee or “Task Force” to oversee Muslim and Sinhalese resettlement in the North. The “Task Force” had as members, Central Ministers D.M.Swamnathan (Resettlement), Faizer Musthapha (Local government and Provincial Councils), Rishad Bathiyutheen (Commerce), and Duminda Dissanayake (Agriculture).
The Task Force was formed following complaints that the Tamil-dominated Northern Provincial Council was giving the Muslim and Sinhalese displaced families a step-motherly treatment.

64% OF PROFESSIONALS ARE WOMEN IN SRI LANKA

df4daa7c387f80cb0de58d664bca4b7f_xl

Image: Sri Lanka Nurses, courtesy of News.lk.

Sri Lanka BriefBy Paneetha Ameresekere.-28/12/2016

Though Sri Lanka has a poor women’s labour force participation rate (LFPR), women comprised a massive 63. 65 per cent of all professionals, and men, a miserly 36.35 per cent, Census and Statistics Department’s (CSD’s) second quarter (2Q) 2016 Labour Survey report showed. Nonetheless, as at end 2015, this number for women was still higher, with 65.8 per cent of all employed professionals in Sri Lanka comprised of women, the CSD said.

Tsunami victims remembered in the North-East

Home
26 Dec  2016
Tamils across the North-East remembered the victims of the Boxing Day tsunami of 2004.

Thug attack on Vavuniya journalist

An unknown group has attacked the residence of the Vavuniya provincial journalist of ‘Deepam’ newspaper Kumarasingham Gokulan say reports.

In the attack the windows and doors of the house have been damaged though none of the occupants were injured.

There have been several instances of threats over the telephone and yesterday (27th) a group that had come in motorbikes has attacked the house with bottles.

Mr. Kumaarasingham Gokulan has lodged a complaint at Vavuniya Police.

gokulan1gokulan2
gokulan3

Media standards and entitlements - Public views expected before 31 December

Media standards and entitlements - Public views expected before 31 December
Dec 28, 2016
A free, independent and diverse media with high ethical standards and professional competence, dedicated to provide a wide range of information and ideas to citizens, while serving as a public forum for well-informed democratic dialogue, is indispensable for the building and maintaining of democracy in Sri Lanka. The government is committed to creating an enabling environment for the media sector which is based on respect for internationally recognised professional standards and practices, and which ensures media accountability to those who rely on the media as a credible source of news and information.

The government has examined the comprehensive assessment of the overall environment for media development as set out in the report Rebuilding Public Trust: An Assessment of the Media Industry and Profession in Sri Lanka, which was presented to the Hon. Prime Minister on 3 May, World Press Freedom Day, 2016 by the multi-stakeholder partnership for media reforms. The report contained a set of evidence-based recommendations developed through a multi-stakeholder consultative process and based on UNESCO’s widely accepted Media Development Indicators.
Similarly, the recently concluded International Conference on RTI Sri Lanka and Media Reforms also deliberated several challenges of the media sector while making some cardinal recommendations.
Some of the key recommendations of the report as well as the international conference require the adoption of enabling legislation. Based on this, the government wishes to undertake a consultation with all interested stakeholders on the measures needed to provide adequate legal protection for journalists and to strengthen systems for media self-regulation.
The government is ready to ensure legal protection for freedom of the press, including by protecting the media’s right to gather news and information, by repealing the SriLankaPress CouncilAct, No 5 of 1979, and by introducing an independent oversight mechanism to foster professional standards, with mandatory powers over media outlets.
In this regard, the government invites the views of interested stakeholders in relation to its proposals to introduce legislation:
1.    To recognise media freedom and the right of the media: (a) to gather and disseminate news and information; (b) to engage in critical reporting on matters of public interest; and (c) to participate in the process of forming public opinion.
2.    To make it a penal offence for anyone wilfully to obstruct the legitimate collection of news and information by a journalist working for a media outlet.
3.    To put in place systems to promote the safety of journalists.
4.    To protect journalist’s right to not to disclose their confidential sources of information.
5.    To make it a penal offence to subject anyone to anylegaloremploymentrelatedsanctionorotherformof discriminationforproviding informationto journalistsworking foramediaoutletconcerning publicaffairsoronmattersofpublicinterest,exceptwherethe secrecyof theinformation is justified byalarger publicinterest.
6.    To make it illegal to impose sanctions on or to terminate the employment of an editor or a journalist because of his or her refusal to violate recognised professional codes of practice.
7.    To establish an independent Council with a mandate to develop and apply codes of practice for media outlets, based on internationally recognised standards for the media.
The proposed Council will function as the oversight mechanism of a system of self-regulation and will the power to apply sanction for wilful violations of its codes of practice. The approaches towards ensuring the independence of the Right to Information Commission will also be applicable to the Council, which will comprise eminent persons of whom two-thirds are nominated by organisations representing the media and journalists and one-third are nominated by civil society organisations.
 To ensure the credibility of and the public confidence in the Council, a Judge of a court of law nominated by the Judicial Services Commission in consultation with the Bar Association of Sri Lanka will serve as Chairperson. The tenure of Council members will be protected and, in particular, removal will only be possible by vote of Parliament following a recommendation of the Constitutional Council.
The functions and powers of the Council will include the following:
a.    Adopt professional Codes of Practice,followingapublic consultation involving journalists’ and editors’ associations, media unions and civil society.
b.    Monitor theperformanceofmedia outletstoensureduecompliancewith the Codes of Practice.
c.    Hold inquiries into alleged violations of theCodes of Practicebased on complaints or the monitoring ofthe Council,and issuedecisions.
d.    Conduct public consultationstoassess thepublicperception ofmedia outlets’ compliancewith the Codes of Practice.
e.    Maintain a database of information on registered media entities.
f.    Co-operate with or undertaketrainingandeducational activities, including by producing trainingmaterials on the effective implementation oftheCodes of Practice.
g.    Exercise powers which are similar to those wielded by the Right to Information Commission in terms of conducting inquiries, with provisions for appeals to the courts against the Council's decisions.
h.    In terms of sanctions, the Council will have the power to issue warnings to media outlets and to order amedia outlet to publish or broadcast the Council’s decision in the manner prescribed bytheCouncil.
i.    Mediate between employersand employees ofmedia outlets in relation to disputes concerningtheenforcement of theCodesof Practice.
The proposed legislation will be applicable to all print and broadcast media outlets, as well as to online media outlets which formally agree to comply with the Codes of Practice.
It shall be an offence for any media outlet to refuse to comply with or to give effect to a decision of the Council, which may be punished by the imposition of a fine after a summary trial before a court of law. Similarly, obstructing the legitimate collection of news and information by a journalist, forcing a journalist to disclose a confidential source of information or discriminating against a journalist who refuses to violate the Codes of Practice will be offenses.
The government invites media organisations, owners and publishers associations, journalists’ unions and associations, civil society organisations and members of the public to express their views on this proposal. Please send your views in writing to the address given below before 31st December 2016.
Director General – Government Information Department
(On behalf of the Secretary to Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs and Mass Media)
No 163, Kirulapana Mawatha,
Colombo 05.
Email :ranga@dgi.gov.lk
Fax: 0112514753
November 23, 2016
Ganeshan accuses Dilan, SB of batting for the JO


2016-12-28 20

Tamil Progressive Alliance (TPA) Leader and Minister Mano Ganeshan today accused some government members of helping the joint opposition which is trying to sabotage the activities of the government. 

He said ministers Dilan Perera and S.B. Dissanayake were siding with the joint opposition and helping the cause of the joint opposition. 

“There is a reactionary group within the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) who are not with President Maithripala Sirisena or with former president Mahinda Rajapaksa and are only helping the joint opposition. "We have formed the national government not to play around but to settle the national issue permanently. The new constitution is not to divide but to unite the country. My friend minister Dilan Perera who is a member of the steering committee knows the mood of the committee," Mr. Ganeshan said said. "The constitutional proposals are being politically misinterpreted by JO members. It is Dilan Perera's duty to express the mood existing within constitutional making steering committee. But instead his behavior indirectly helps the JO agenda. A minority-friendly Dilan should realize that JO is trying to destroy the government by propagating lies about the proposed constitution. We of the TPA want both major parties together until the arrival of the new constitution. We can part ways later if necessary. SLFP can form a UPFA government. UNP can form a UNF government. Or we can go for a snap general election. We of the TPA are ready for all options but now we stand for the protection of the national government led by the President and the Prime Minister," he added.

 Minister P Thigambaram said the national government formed by the SLFP and the UNP should run its full term based on the pledges given by the President and the Prime Minister.



 He said it was the duty of the government members to see that it serves the full term. “We urge all members of the government to see that pledge made by the prime minister and the government is kept," Mr Thigambaram said. (Yohan Perera)

2016-12-27-ft-26

logoWednesday, 28 December 2016

Understanding in some sense is always retrospective. The past two were years of hope for good governance. This essay is an attempt to be more in touch with reality.

“Millions were spent to get down a horse from Queen Elizabeth’s stables. It was taken to Nuwara Eliya. The prince goes to Nuwara Eliya by helicopter to ride the ‘Buckingham’ horse. He comes back to Colombo in the chopper in the evening. However, youths in our villages have to wait looking at the future. Do we allow this dictatorship to continue?” asked the common candidate at Panduwasnuwara on 14 December 2014 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQW9khV56Vg).

Thanks to the internet, it is possible for us to recall and relive the passion and the indignation of the common candidate expressed in 2014 in all its spotless accuracy from digital archives available on the internet. 
ft-25-s-2016-12-27

The ostrich’s approach 

In a recent address to the Judicial Services Association, President Sirisena said that he was the person who earned most censure from websites. No one else could come close. He had totally given up scanning websites and advised even his family members to ignore them.

All politicians including presidents are human beings first. His instinctive reaction to web contents though flawed is unsurprising. That said, the ostrich’s approach is appallingly stupid. In politics, lack of objectivity can be a deadly sin. Confusing statements of fact with statements of value is a mistake. In the age of information we need to be reconciled to a world of volatile politics.

Ours is also an age of acceleration. Its momentum is fuelled by advances in communication technology. The internet can inform and misinform. It can make the dumb dumber and the informed better informed. The internet has outflanked the mainstream media.

The mainstream media did not report how the self-proclaimed hero of Nandikadal manhandled a 16-year-old student who was about to enter the examination hall to sit for his O/Levels. The websites reported the incident.

Mainstream print and electronic media reported in great and grand detail how the President and Prime Minister felicitated a Buddhist monk celebrating his 74th birthday, diminishing the Buddhist doctrine of transient, evanescent, inconstant, impermanence. The websites ignored it. Rightly so.

Mass communication is no longer the preserve of media owners. The flow of information is not subject to the discretion of traditional gatekeepers. The proliferation of sources of information has empowered the citizens to select sources of information they trust. If citizens opt to follow a website that the President has decided to ignore, it is just too bad for the President. 


Time for clarity and precision

It is time for clarity and precision. President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe have positively and conclusively succeeded in forfeiting the trust and respect of those who voted for change on 8 January 2015. The country is in a state of protracted flux.

The signs appeared early. The man who promised an end to nepotism appointed his brother to the top job in Telecom. It was not all that bad. There was yet, plenty of hope. He had many brothers and only one was chosen. Revolutions don’t come cheap. Okay. Every Fidel needs a Raul.

Then something else followed. The restoration of rejects to Parliament determined the trajectory of the new order. Capture of the political base of the common candidate was the priority. It removed whatever hopes the public had for a government that observed ethical propriety.

The alleged bond scam undermined the promised integrity in governance. The resignation of the Director General of the Commission investigating Bribery and Corruption undermined public confidence in the Government’s ability to fight corruption – a key campaign pledge. These deliberate detours underscored the Government’s indifference to public opinion and contempt for due process.

The third year in office commences with strong evidence of intolerance for dissent. The regime consistently evades accountability. It avoids explanations for its conduct. The Prime Minister makes policy statements but refuses to debate issues. His strategy of trivialising the opposite view earns him enthusiastic table thumping from his backbenchers. Cheap applause and the praise of underlings! To the vast majority in the country, he remains a stand offish leader removed from reality.

The President adopts a different style. Philosophising even the most mundane comes naturally to him. His homilies invariably begin with a ritual request for sufferance of his dispensed wisdom. “Venerated and sacred Maha Sangha, permit me…”

Our Buddhist monks are masters of statecraft. In the business of devotion and piety they practice free market principles of competition. They know that the President is engaged in a battle of wits with his predecessor for control of the SLFP – the party that epitomises Sinhala Buddhist quintessence according to conventional wisdom.


Many ways to deceive people 

There are many ways to deceive other people. An outright lie is the simplest. It is also possible to deceive by avoiding the truth. Obfuscating or exaggerating the truth are equally effective. The most damning is casting doubt on the truth. Reports on investigations and court proceedings offer more than adequate evidence to illustrate the collusion between hound and hare.

Trust in and respect for the political process is vital for a credible democracy. The proposed constitutional reforms will not be endorsed by an electorate that is deeply sceptical of its authors. Good governance is not an abstract principle but a practice. The President’s and the Prime Minister’s lectures and sermons are no substitute for ethical governance.

Regional economic integration makes eminent common sense. Yet, we cannot make Sri Lanka another Singapore. Unburdened by a manufactured history Singapore has leveraged its geography. Singapore has no Maha Nayakes and Anu Nayakes advising on policy.

Ahilan Kadirgamar, political economist and member of the Collective for Economic Democratisation in Sri Lanka, captures the current stalemate.

“With the ETCA debate polarised between the free trade elite and the anti-Indian forces, there has been little informed debate including critical analysis of trade liberalisation, broader neoliberal reforms and the deteriorating global economic situation. For those bothered by xenophobia and economic marginalisation, the challenge is to oppose both the reflexive anti-Indian campaign of the nationalists and the neoliberal policies of the liberalisers.” 


Double standards

In the past two years, we have witnessed far too many instances of double standards in both decision making and policy implementation. A recent new report has Nimal Bopage, Secretary Ministry of අParliamentary Reforms and Mass Media, declaring to the media: “I have been told to sign or resign not as a threat but as a matter of course. The Prime Minister is a good statesman. What he said was correct; as my duty is to sign a document which has been approved by the Cabinet – and if I fail to do so I should resign.’

The statement of this public servant is symptomatic of a rudderless government. The Secretary of the Ministry of Mass Media wants us to believe that that the Prime Minster is a good statesman and he, an equally good public officer. In this country people in high office do not resign. They resign themselves to whatever new situation that emerges after throwing the dice. Making governance a circus and himself its leading Bozo is his prerogative.

A sceptical public now refuse to swallow stories of profligacy by the predecessors and are convinced that the successors are no better. The failure of the Prime Minister’s technocrats to engage with people’s concerns has compounded popular resentment.

The previous regime brilliantly introduced the idea of ‘Ranaviru’ in to the collective unconscious of the Sinhala mind. Yet, it remained an inexplicit idea. President Sirisena in October 2016 made it an explicit idea. 


Government has failed

This Government has failed. Speed is essential for meaningful reform. If reforms do not follow immediately after change, the movement loses its momentum. The change of 8 January 2015 failed to dislodge the entrenched elite. All they needed was a small window of opportunity to hijack the movement for reform by raising concerns of national security.

People who yearned for good governance now demand it. The demand is directed to a regime that has reneged on its promise. The political success of a reform movement pivots on the consistency with which it correlates vision with process. Proof of the pudding is transparency of process.

Insider’s book sheds light on Sri Lanka’s regime-change operation

By Vijith Samarasinghe -20 December 2016
November 21 marked the second anniversary of Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena’s defection from former President Mahinda Rajapakse’s government to contest the January 2015 presidential election as the opposition’s “common candidate.” Sirisena, who was Rajapakse’s health minister and secretary of the ruling Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), defeated the incumbent and formed a coalition government with the United National Party (UNP), appointing its leader Ranil Wickremesinghe as prime minister.
The mainstream media and pseudo-left groups hailed Sirisena’s election victory as a “democratic revolution.” Only the World Socialist Web Site and Socialist Equality Party explained that Sirisena’s cross-over was part of a reactionary regime-change operation orchestrated by Washington against Rajapakse’s pro-China tilt.

A recent book by a SLFP parliamentarian, Malith Jayathilake, titled The January 8th Revolution: As I Have Seen It, contains some inside information on how leading figures in Sri Lanka’s ruling elite conspired to oust Rajapakse. Jayathilake was a former advisor for Rajapakse’s ruling cabal, but later became Sirisena’s election propagandist.

While the book was written to glorify Sirisena and others who backed him, it confirms aspects of the WSWS’s detailed analysis of the regime-change operation. Jayathilake deliberately avoids mentioning Washington’s intervention. Sirisena, Wickremesinghe and their cohorts fear that revealing US imperialism’s connection to their installation would be politically suicidal.

Jayathilake portrays former President Chandrika Kumaratunga as the chief actor in Sirisena’s defection from Rajapakse. Her central role, however, was principally determined by her US connections, highlighted by the WSWS. After her presidency ended in 2005, Kumaratunga joined the Clinton Foundation of former US President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary Clinton, who became secretary of state during the Obama administration’s first term.

Under Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the US instigated its “pivot” to Asia to isolate and militarily encircle China and to undermine Beijing’s influence in the region. In her efforts to align countries in the region behind Washington, Clinton bullied the Rajapakse government to distance itself from China. After attempts to pressure Rajapakse over Sri Lankan war crimes failed, Washington systematically worked toward regime change. Former US ambassador in Colombo, Michele Sison coordinated these activities, having connections with Kumaratunga, Wickremesinghe and middle-class groups such as the National Movement for Social Justice (NMSJ).

The book reveals that Kumaratunga began tapping Sirisena as a possible presidential candidate in 2013, sending feelers to see his views. According to the book, Sirisena initially replied: “I cannot agree to this [proposal].”

Kumaratunga started to exploit discontent within the SLFP against Rajapakse and his cabal, who had concentrated political power in their hands and marginalised senior party figures. Rifts within the SLFP were such that several MPs wanted Kumaratunga to become a “common opposition” candidate to defeat Rajapakse.

Kumaratunga told her close circle she would not contest a presidential election, giving various reasons. The book covers up the real political reason for her reluctance. Kumaratunga was well aware that she ended her presidential term thoroughly discredited because of her government’s attacks on living conditions and democratic rights and its resumption of the communal war against the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

Kumaratunga continued her intrigues, sending emissaries to Sirisena. According to Jayathilake’s book, Kumaratunga established direct contact with Sirisena by June 2014, on the pretext of discussing problems with a hospital established in her late husband Vijaya Kumaratunga’s name. She also used the Viber messaging system to contact Sirisena and others. Facing the intrigues of his political opponents, Rajapakse set up phone-tapping equipment to seek information on the plotting.

In July 2014, Rajapakse indicated he was planning to call an early election. The book explains that Kumaratunga intensified her efforts. She advised her personal friend and current MP Jayampathy Wickramaratne and her chief of staff P. Dissanayake to start secret negotiations for Sirisena’s defection.

Kumaratunga and UNP leader Wickremesinghe had already started talks to coordinate efforts to oust Rajapakse. Her aim was to enlist a section of the SLFP and get the support of the UNP leader to field Sirisena as a common opposition candidate.

While agreeing to the proposal, Wickremesinghe was planning to contest the election himself. However, the view of prominent UNP leaders, including Mangala Samaraweera, Ravi Karunanayake and Malik Samarawickrama, and also Kumaratunga and those opposed to Rajapakse in his party, was that Wickremesinghe should not be the common candidate.

At a secret meeting held at her house on November 6, 2014, Kumaratunga told Wickremesinghe he could not become the candidate. One reason was the unwillingness of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) and Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) to support him. “They think your image has collapsed,” she said.
Underscoring the capitalist elite’s communal considerations in selecting a candidate, Kumaratunga also pointed to the lack of confidence about Wickremesinghe among the Sinhala communal parties.

In this meeting, for the first time she revealed Sirisena’s intention to defect and reportedly told Wickremesinghe: “If you agree, I’ll get him [Sirisena] to agree.” Wickremesinghe finally agreed to give way to Sirisena, just two weeks before the latter’s defection.

Kumaratunga had conducted talks with the TNA for a “common candidate” since September 2014 without divulging Sirisena’s name. She conveyed the idea to TNA MP M.A. Sumanthiran and he agreed. 

In October, in a discussion at her house, Kumaratunga told TNA leader R. Sambandan that Sirisena would be the candidate and he was enthused. The TNA, representing the Tamil capitalist elite, lined up with the regime-change plot.

As the WSWS explained in January 2015, the TNA’s decision to back Sirisena was not a last-minute decision. It was a carefully prepared move, fully endorsed by Washington and New Delhi. The main tactical calculation in delaying announcing the TNA’s support until late December was to avoid Rajapakse’s communalist accusations that Sirisena had caved in to Tamil parties.

For some time, Kumaratunga and Wickremesinghe held discussions with the Sinhala extremist Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU), a partner in Rajapakse’s government, and the communalist opposition Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) to rally them behind their plot.

This account again demonstrates that there was not a grain of “democracy” in presenting Sirisena as the “common presidential candidate.” Everyone involved conspiratorially schemed behind closed doors in Colombo, monitored by Washington.

While a propaganda drive was drummed up against Rajapakse’s anti-democratic rule and corruption, nothing was said about Sirisena’s role as one of Rajapakse’s ministers or the autocratic methods of the UNP while in power.

Professors and pseudo-radicals initiated the NMSJ and Citizen’s Power campaign against Rajapakse’s “corruption and nepotism.” Many of them had already lined up behind the bogus US human rights campaign against Rajapakse. When Sirisena’s candidacy was announced, they were jubilant.

This exercise was not limited to a presidential election. If the operation had failed to defeat Rajapakse in the election, it would have culminated in a Washington-instigated “colour revolution” to oust him.
Nearly two years of rule by the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government have proved that this regime change was not conducted out of concerns for the democratic rights of workers and poor. The government’s major move has been to deepen political and military ties with the US.

As the WSWS and the SEP warned, this government—which came to power under the false banner of “good governance”—has imposed savage austerity measures, deepened the attacks on workers and democratic rights, and steadily dragged Sri Lanka into the maelstrom of US war preparations in the Indian Ocean.