Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, December 14, 2016


An interest rate hike will affect anyone with a home mortgage, car loan, savings account or money in the stock market. Here's what it means for your wallet. (Daron Taylor/The Washington Post)


 

The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate on Wednesday for the first time in a year and signaled that rates could continue to rise next year more quickly than officials had expected.

The increase was unanimous and modest, raising the Fed’s key interest rate by a quarter point, from a range of 0.25 to 0.5 percent to a range of 0.5 to 0.75 percent. It reflects Fed officials' confidence in the strengthening of the U.S. economy and what officials see as budding signs of higher inflation.

But unlike corporate executives and stock traders, Fed officials do not appear to be anticipating a massive growth boost next year from economic policies implemented by President-elect Donald Trump, but they appear set to raise rates faster if those policies were to cause an overheating in the economy.
Markets were slightly up immediately after the announcement, but they started to dive about an hour later, after Fed Chair Janet L. Yellen concluded a news conference about the rate hike. The Dow Jones industrial average closed down 0.6 percent, the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index slid 0.8 percent, and the Nasdaq tech index was down 0.5 percent.

Yellen told reporters that she and the Federal Open Market Committee were “recognizing the considerable progress the economy has made” toward full employment and an inflation target of 2 percent. She indicated that she did not see much need for a large, deficit-financed boost from federal fiscal policy, either tax cuts or spending increases.

“I would say at this point that fiscal policy is not obviously needed to provide stimulus to help us get back to full employment,” Yellen said. She then added that she was not trying to advise Trump and Congress on fiscal issues.

Economic projections also released by the central bank indicate that the Fed now expects the economy to grow 1.9 percent in 2016 and 2.1 percent in 2017. The projections show that the group expects the Fed to increase rates three times in 2017, to a rate of 1.4 percent by year's end. Its September projections signaled only two expected hikes next year.

Analysts have warned that if Trump and Congress agree to slash tax rates and increase spending in areas such as infrastructure the Fed could be forced to raise rates faster than expected to counter rising prices.
Yellen highlighted uncertainty over those policies at her news conference but said some Fed officials had tried to incorporate expected fiscal changes in their forecasts. Since Trump’s election, markets have jumped — with the Dow closing in on a record-breaking 20,000 — and long-term rates and the dollar have increased.

Several analysts said the Fed was right to take that approach to the new administration’s policies. “The Fed will likely be in wait-and-see mode, given this substantial policy uncertainty,” said Doug Duncan, the chief economist at Fannie Mae, “and we view this prudency a virtue.”

Much of the Fed statement released Wednesday was unchanged from November, when the Fed declined to raise rates, choosing “to wait for some further evidence of continued progress” toward maximum employment in the economy and a target inflation rate of 2 percent. Officials said Wednesday, as they said a month ago, that “near-term risks to the economic outlook appear roughly balanced” — meaning growth is as likely to speed up as it is to slow down.

Fed officials now judge the overall inflation rate to be 1.5 percent, up from 1.3 percent in September, but still well below target. They judge core inflation, which excludes volatile commodities such as gasoline prices, to be 1.7 percent.

In the statement, officials said that “inflation has increased since earlier this year,” a change from November, when the statement said that “inflation has increased somewhat since earlier this year.” 

Officials also said that measures of inflation compensation “have moved up considerably but remain low.” Last month, the word “considerably” did not appear in that line.

The Fed's decision drew criticism from some liberal economists who want rates to stay as low as possible to further boost employment while inflation remains below target.

“The Fed's action today was unwelcome but not unexpected. Still huge economic risks and little evidence of an inflation problem” economist and former treasury secretary Larry Summers wrote in a tweet.

Yellen, in her news conference, said she does not favor running a “high-pressure economy” where inflation might overshoot its target. “I do want to make clear,” she said, “that I have not recommended running a hot economy as some sort of experiment.”

The Federal Reserve raised interest rates by a quarter point Dec. 14 and signaled a faster pace of increases in 2017 as the Trump administration takes over with promises to boost growth through tax cuts, spending and deregulation. (Reuters)

The central bank last raised rates at its December meeting a year ago, its first step toward moving the Fed from what economists call the zero-lower bound — meaning interest rates hovering around zero percent.
Trump has promised to cut taxes for individuals and corporations and to boost infrastructure spending by as much as $1 trillion through tax credits that his team says will pay for themselves.

Although Trump praised the Fed chair during his campaign, saying he has “great respect” for Yellen, he was mostly critical. Accusing Yellen and the Fed of keeping rates low to help President Obama, Trump said in September: “I think she is very political, and to a certain extent, I think she should be ashamed of herself.”

Yellen's term ends in early 2018. Asked about whether she would leave her post when the president-elect takes office, the Fed chair said: “I do intend to serve out my four-year term. I haven’t made any decision about the future.”

Analysts did not expect Fed officials to change their forecasts of future increases this month based on an expectation of what Trump and Congress might do.

“We very much doubt that FOMC members want to be accused of seeking to influence Congress and the new administration,” analysts at Pantheon Macroeconomics wrote this week, “given how unpopular the Fed is already with Republican politicians.”

Jim Tankersley covers economic policy for The Post. He's from Oregon, and he misses it.

'One billion' affected by Yahoo hack


Yahoo phone
BBC
14 December 2016
Yahoo has said more than one billion user accounts may have been affected in a hacking attack dating back to 2013.
The internet giant said it appears separate from a breach disclosed in September, when Yahoo revealed some 500 million accounts were accessed in 2014.
Yahoo said names, phone numbers, passwords and email addresses were stolen, but not bank and payment data.
The company, which is being taken over by Verizon, said it is working closely with the police and authorities.
When Yahoo disclosed in September the 2014 data breach, the company said information had been "stolen by what we believe is a state-sponsored actor". Yahoo did not say which country it held responsible.
That breach included swathes of personal information, including names and emails, as well as "unencrypted security questions and answers".
The hack took place in 2014, and Yahoo has come under pressure to disclose why it took so long for the breach to be made public.
The new breach raises fresh questions about Verizon's $4.8n proposed acquisition of Yahoo, and whether the US mobile carrier will try to modify or abandon its bid.
If the hacks cause a user backlash against Yahoo, the company's services would not be as valuable to Verizon.

Passwords

In a statement, Verizon said that it would evaluate the situation as Yahoo investigates and would review the "new development before reaching any final conclusions".
Yahoo said on Wednesday that users should change their passwords and security questions.
The company said in a statement: "Yahoo believes an unauthorized third party, in August 2013, stole data associated with more than one billion user accounts."
Yahoo said this case "is likely distinct from the incident the company disclosed on September 22, 2016".
However, the latest breach was uncovered as part of continuing investigations by authorities and security experts into the previous hack, Yahoo said.
The latest breach discovery is a further embarrassment to a company that was one of the biggest names of the internet but which has failed to keep up with rising stars such as Google and Facebook.
Yahoo's valuation hit $125bn during the dot-com boom, but it has been losing ground since then despite several attempts to revive its fortunes.

Cancer doctors didn't tell me I could freeze my eggs - now I fear I can't have children

Naomi Sneade wishes she had been given the option of freezing her eggs
Naomi Sneade, a cancer survivor, wishes she had been given the option of freezing her eggs (File photo) CREDIT: PA

According to Cancer Research UK, around a tenth of new cancer cases are people aged 25-49, with twice as many females as males affected in this age group. The number of teenagers and young adults with cancer is also rising.
Since 1998, the incident rate of those aged between 15 and 24 has risen from around 10 cases in every 100,000; to nearly 16, government statistics found.

As victims get younger, and recovery rates increase, it's understandable that young women who survive cancer might want to start a family.However, many of the treatments for cancer such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy can leave patients infertile.

Despite official guidelines requiring hospitals to offer fertility preservation treatment if the prognosis is good enough, the health service was recently criticised for not offering teenage girls suffering from cancer the same chance to preserve their ability to have children as male patients.

While NHS hospitals regularly offer young men facing chemotherapy the opportunity to freeze their sperm, many routinely fail to remind women that they can cryopreserve their eggs.

Because sperm freezing is by far the longer-standing, simpler and cheaper treatment, male patients are far more likely to be offered it that the female equivalent, says Valerie Peddie, expert in fertility nursing at Aberdeen University.

Furthermore, just over half (53 percent) of younger women diagnosed with breast cancer have no discussion with healthcare professionals about fertility preservation options, which include freezing embryos or eggs, a survey by Breast Cancer Care found.

Here, 33-year-old Naomi Sneade - who has had cancer three times and now fears she won’t be able to have children - tells Telegraph Women her story:

'I was 29 when I was first diagnosed with breast cancer. While showering, I found a lump and Googled frantically for an answer, trying to convince myself it was nothing. After all, I was too young.

But from the moment I was diagnosed, everything became a complete blur. The doctors wanted to start treatment as soon as possible because my cancer was stage three and aggressive.

I was so swept up in it all, I don’t remember thinking about fertility - let alone asking about it. At the time, I had only been with my now fiance, Luke, for a year - a child was not on the cards. Of course, I was aware that the treatment could affect my fertility, but nobody told me that I could freeze my eggs, or that I had options.

At the beginning, I remember lying in bed with a death sentence hanging over me. I couldn’t stop thinking about all the things in life I would miss out on, including bringing up a family. My only focus was beating cancer and staying alive. You aren’t afforded the luxury of looking ahead.
Naomi Sneade and her fiance Luke in hospital
Naomi Sneade and her fiance Luke in hospital CREDIT: NAOMI SNEADE
It wasn’t until now - having overcome cancer three times in four years - that I've finally had a chance to breathe and focus on my future. I have always wanted children but, now I'm ready to start a family, I might not be able to.

I only found out about egg freezing when it was too late. You put your faith in the doctors to tell you everything: they drum into you what the side-effects will be, but nobody speaks about what life will be like after treatment - if you make it.

I feel bad for being angry, for wanting more, because I don’t doubt the doctors did everything they could to keep me alive. They saved me. But there needs to be a system in place for women to be offered every option available to safeguard their chances of having a child. I feel robbed of that choice.

More and more people are surviving cancer, so it is increasingly important to be given that option. My illness affects my hormones so that treatment, as well as the chemo, impacted my fertility. That’s why it’s so important to know before you start treatment, because after that, you might not have the chance.
At the moment, I am still considered too high risk to try for a baby. But after I get married in 2018, I plan to start a family.

Even if I can get pregnant, I am worried that re-introducing hormones to my body, will bring my cancer back. If I have children, I want to be there for them - but there’s a possibility I won’t.

After everything that's happened, I am desperate to fulfil every life goal; every dream. Each moment is so precious and when I see people take something like having a child - something many feel entitled to - for granted, it upsets me.

Sometimes, I find it challenging to see the future after so many years of battling cancer. But being positive has got me this far and hopefully it can bring me a baby, too.

Anyone with questions about breast cancer and fertility can call Breast Cancer Care free on 0808 800 6000 or visit breastcancercare.org.uk

Tuesday, December 13, 2016

Indulging in sunshine stories and taking foolhardy risks

Indulging in Sunshine Stories and Taking Foolhardy Risks - Kishali Pinto Jayawardena
Sunday, December 11, 2016

If the thinking was that the risks of taking an intelligence chief as part of the Government delegation to brief the United Nations Committee against Torture (UNCAT) recently would be offset as a result of sunshine stories spun by the Government’s policy propagandists living in cloud cuckoo land, then a rude shock was administered this week.

The drama was completely unnecessary

This came in the form of a sharp reprimand issued by the UNCAT using less than the normal diplomatic language than is wont in responding to Sri Lanka’s failure to meet state party obligations under the Convention against Torture. The Committee professed itself ‘alarmed by the presence of the Chief of National Intelligence, Sisira Mendis, as part of the Sri Lankan delegation, since he was the Deputy Inspector General of the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) from March 2008 to June 2009.’

This was in the background of allegations of torture being leveled against officers of the CID during that period by detainees kept in the premises. The Committee proclaimed its ‘deep regret that neither Mr. Mendis nor any other member of the delegation provided information in response to the many specific questions raised.’

From any sensible standpoint, this drama was completely unnecessary. It beggars the imagination as to why this provocation occurred at all in the first instance. Was the Government so woefully ignorant and so bereft of representatives that it had to include an official whose very presence was bound to raise red flags? Or was it that it was so arrogant that it thought that no challenge would come in the first instance? In either respect, the conclusion was absurdly wrong. It put the country into an impossible position of having to defend itself against the indefensible.

Long list of concerns

The Committee’s concerns were made against a background of the State’s failure to perform. While acknowledging some advances on the ground after the change of political power last year, the Committee drew up a long list of pending issues. Heading this list was the finding that torture during law enforcement investigations remained routine in Sri Lanka. The focus was on practical issues rather than esoteric matters of law which were unsuccessfully attempted to be used by the Government representatives as proverbial red herrings.

Indeed, two emblematic cases illustrate persistent concerns pointed to by the Committee very well even though these were not specifically raised before the jurists as such. The first of these instances concerns a torture case of a teenager way back in 2003. This was a case of mistaken identity as much as in many other such instances painfully symbolized in the well known case of Gerald Perera an employee of the Colombo dockyard.
Perera was peacefully living his life until the police arrested him mistakenly when searching for a known criminal going by that same name and tortured him to the point of renal failure. He succeeded in the Supreme Court when an outraged Bench awarded him compensation but later, was killed by the very same torturers days before he was due to give evidence in the criminal trial under Sri Lanka’s Convention against Torture (CAT) Act.

Justice denied by laws’ delays

Here too, the tortured teenager living in a remote village had testified to officers of the Saliyawewa Police Station compelling him to sit on an ant hill for the alleged petty crime of stealing a necklace. He was thereafter hung from a beam with his hands tied behind his back. If that was not bad enough, the responsible police officers identified the real culprit the following day and tendered an apology to the teenager and his family. The Attorney General (AG) then filed an indictment under the CAT Act against the officer in charge (OIC) of the police station and a ‘grama arakshaka niladhari.’

This was a notable instance where the AG found it fit to indict the OIC in the wake of earlier refusals to do so in response to which judicial queries had been raised in Gerald Perera’s case. However, the case was concluded in the High Court recently with numerous delays and with six trial judges hearing segments of the testimony with no continuity. In all, the matter had taken virtually thirteen years to conclude with the judge on record finding that torture had been proved but that the identity of the accused as culpable in terms of the law had not been sufficiently established on the evidence.

Activists monitoring the case however contend that the identification of the accused was sufficiently established on the record by prosecution witnesses and have appealed to the Attorney General to go against the acquittal in the appeal court. The larger point here is that, when a torture trial takes so long to hear, what possibility could there be of a positive outcome in the case?

Use of detention to terrorise

The second instance which is relevant in this discussion is last month’s finding of another juristic body of the United Nations, this time the UN Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) which considered the torture and brutal interrogation in Colombo of a visiting Canadian citizen of Tamil ethnicity, Roy Samanatham who had been arrested in 2007 under the emergency law on flimsy charges of acting in a manner prejudicial to national security upon being found to be in possession of 600 mobile phones.

His protests that these were items that he had imported from Singapore for a friend’s business and that he was visiting Sri Lanka to carry out his marriage were to no avail. Unsurprisingly the Committee found a violation of Covenant rights and asked the state party to provide redress by locating and prosecuting those responsible for Samathanam’s torture.

It was observed that the reasons for his arrest had not been given, he had not been detained on lawful grounds, he was not given the opportunity to challenge the lawfulness of his detention, that he was brought to a judge after one year of being detained, in or about September 2008 and that during this period he was held in detention without charges.

Common struggle for accountability

In sum, the UNCAT’s recent findings reflect these same striking patterns of impunity, regardless of whether it occurs in what part of the country or whether it targets individuals of a particular ethnicity. That fact may be remembered as driving what must be a common struggle to restore accountability in law enforcement.

Preparing the ground for constitutional reform


article_image
By Jehan Perera- 

There seems to be a rethinking on the part of the government regarding the nature and extent of constitutional reform. The SLFP is of the stance that the Constitution should be amended without going in for a referendum. SLFP media spokesman Minister Dilan Perera said "We have spoken with the President and taken a clear decision on this. Electoral reforms must take place and a new system introduced and we believe in maximum devolution of power within a unitary state. We have also made it clear that we will not support the merger of provinces or to lessen the power of the governors to make it a nominal position." For its part, the UNP has taken the position that it would support a system where the office of executive president would continue with special powers that the 19th Amendment to the Constitution had conferred.

A decision taken at a special meeting of the UNP Working Committee presided over by party leader and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe is that in keeping with its manifesto presented at the last general election, it would work towards enacting a new Constitution, where the Prime Minister would be answerable to both the Parliament and the executive. It also reiterated its support for greater devolution of power within a unitary state, and an electoral system which was a cross between the first-past-the-post and the proportional representation system, which the proposed 20th Amendment to the Constitution has envisaged. These positions taken by the UNP appear to be a compromise in deference to the position held by leading members of the SLFP.

The statements above indicate that the political parties that constitute the government seem to be lowering their sights. This would be unfortunate. There appears to be apprehensions within the government that referendums around the world have not gone well, the most recent being the resignation of the Italian Prime Minister after losing a referendum on constitutional change. People have voted for things other than the question they were asked in it. The government position is that if that happens, change will amount to nothing. However, Sri Lanka needs reforms that are fundamental. There is a need to find a solution to the protracted ethnic conflict. There needs to be away to check and balance the power of politicians. Lord Acton’s pronouncement in the 19th century, that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, holds true today as it held then. The financial corruption and human rights violations of past dispensations are still fresh in the minds of people.

NEW MESSAGES

The former government, and the Joint Opposition to which it has metamorphosed today, have taken the view that foreign interference and the division of the country are threatening Sri Lanka again. They are replaying the message of the past. However, for the past two years a key message going to the people at large has been a different and more positive one that focuses on the crucial importance of ethnic reconciliation. Reducing the level of tension and mistrust between the communities, and preventing a resumption of violence is the main priority if a stable economic environment is to be obtained in which economic investments and growth can take off. The leaders of the SLFP and UNP, President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe respectively, have consistently spoken against racism and ethnic nationalist sentiment.

There is an unprecedented readiness in most of society for a system of government that would strengthen the independence of state institutions particularly those concerned with law enforcement, particularly the judiciary and police, so that they can do their work without discrimination and without political interference. The decision of the Constitutional Council to probe the conduct of the Inspector General of Police who was caught on live television acquiescing with the demand of someone more senior than himself, whom he addressed as Sir, was in accordance with popular sentiment. Ideally the independence of the police will be strengthened as a result of the probe.

Another reason why the present time is opportune for constitutional reform is that the government comprises an unprecedented coalition of the two biggest political parties in the country. The history of efforts to resolve the ethnic conflict that led to three decades of internal war was the failure of these two parties to collaborate to find a mutually acceptable solution. This was not for a dearth of enlightened leaders. The two parties had leaders who tried to solve the problems with the agreement of the representatives of the Tamil people. SWRD Bandaranaike in 1957 and Dudley Senanayake in 1965 were pre-eminent leaders of SLFP and UNP-led governments respectively. Both could not obtain the necessary bipartisan support of the other party, and so the agreements reached could not be sustained. However, today, popular sentiment in the country has undergone a change.

OPPORTUNE TIME

The seven years since the end of the war have been ones that are free of armed militancy, large scale violence or any sign of a revolt. This makes the present time an opportune one in which to involve the masses of people in a constitutional reform process that addresses the ethnic conflict as a matter of priority. The warmth of the relationship between the top rungs of the government and members of the Tamil and Muslim political parties has permeated the entire electorate. This moment needs to be taken. It might be difficult for the ethnic minority parties to come to terms with a constitutional reform that does not address ethnic minority issues.

As part of its ongoing peacebuilding effort, this past month I and my colleagues at the National Peace Council conducted four Truth Forums in Jaffna, Batticaloa, Kandy and Matara. In each of these districts, inter religious committees that had been set up several years earlier, were tasked with identifying those who had been victims in the past and persuading them to share their stories with the larger community. This was to generate empathy for the other within the larger community. It was also to convey the message that civil society itself needs to take on responsibility for assisting the victims, rather than leaving it all to the government. When people share their stories of enforced victimhood and what happened to them and to their loved ones it generates empathy in the listeners who get to know at first hand the sufferings that others have gone through.

Another reason for organizing the Truth Forums was to prepare the general population for the anticipated government appointed Truth Commission. In responding to the international demand for accountability of past violations of human rights and war crimes, the government has said it will establish a Truth Commission to be a part of the reconciliation mechanisms. Over 40 countries that have suffered war and mass violations of human rights have appointed Truth Commissions over the past four decades to deal with post-war issues of justice and accountability. The purpose of these mechanisms is not only to placate the international community’s sense of justice and accountability. It is also to involve the people in the process of transformation that accompanies an attitudinal shift from a divided past to a shared future.

NEVER AGAIN

What was significant about the Truth Forums was that they were taken seriously by all who participated in them. Between 80 to 100 persons drawn from different walks of life, including public servants, members of community based organizations and media attended the events in each of the places where they were conducted, which were presided over by retired judges or public servants. Their active and sober participation was an indication that Sri Lankan society is ready and able to take responsibility to heal the wounds of war. The time frame of the story telling by victims was not limited to the last phase of the war. It also included the suicide bombing incident that took place in Matara in 2009, the eviction of Muslims from the North in 1990 and the JVP insurrection of 1988. Over and over again those who spoke, either as victims or as observers said this must never happen again. The victims who testified will be expecting some remedial measures to be taken to address their urgent needs.

Apart from saying never again, those who participated in the Truth Forums said that something had to be done to address the needs of the victims. Government servants who attended, though not in their official capacities, pledged that they would do what was in their power to help the victims from within the structures of government. Community leaders said they would see what they could do to follow up on the disclosures made. However, along with these positive indications of the willingness of the community to take on the task of reconciliation, there were also intrusions of harsher realities. The ability of civil society organizations to solve people’s problems cannot be compared to that of the government. In one location, the manager of the conference hall was visited by the security forces. They questioned and intimidated him so much that he said he would no longer provide facilities for such a programme.

The positive outcome of the civil society led Truth Forums points to the promise of the government’s Truth Commission which is about to be established. It also suggests that instead of a single and centralized Truth Commission, a decentralized process of truth seeking could also be envisaged. Alongside the main Truth Commission there could be local level Truth Commissions that are entrusted to local community and religious leaders and which feed into the government-led truth seeking process. The conviction that the violence and human rights violations of the past must never again happen can capture the mass imagination to facilitate constitutional reform that unlocks the door to a lasting political solution to the decades long ethnic conflict.

Constitutional Reforms: Duplicity of Mahinda Rajapaksa


There is no question that a concurrent list should remain, perhaps in a reduced form, and better called ‘Cooperative List’ to mean subjects that the Centre and the Provinces should exercise not competitively or antagonistically but cooperatively.

by Laksiri Fernando-Dec 13, 2016

( December 13, 2016, Sydney, Sri Lanka Guardian) Mahinda Rajapaksa issued a statement on “Constitutional Reform Programme” recently (4 December 2016) referring to the six Sub-Committee reports submitted to the Constitutional Assembly (Parliament), without enlightening the public of ‘what was exactly wrong’ or ‘what should be revised’ in respect of the recommendations that they have submitted. This was not worthy of a person who was the President of the country twice, elected in 2005 and 2010.

The Ranil Dilemma


Colombo TelegraphBy Thushara D Wanniarachchi –December 13, 2016 
Thushara D Wanniarachchi
Thushara D Wanniarachchi
It is nearing two years since the ‘Good Governance’ regime (‘Yahapalanaya’) came into power. Through Sri Lanka’s civil intellectuals, civil organizations, the Muslim and Tamil communities, and the political movement build by the UNP, the present government was built.
In recent years, many Nations of the world which obtained their power through a political header, saw the country torn apart, crisis’ emerging and going from bad to worse. It didn’t take as much as 6 months for these nations to face such an unfortunate fate, and there are many examples to this effect – Egypt, Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran. However, in Sri Lanka, with a two-thirds majority, an established rule of law, and securing the democratic rights of the citizens, we can see the nation entering a stable phase even after 2 years.
However, there is a certain level of technical weaknesses which can be seen within that stability. Those travelling the path of Good Governance are not merely those who made personal sacrifices to bring about the present government. Much like the infamous poem by Premakeerthi de Alwis, after January 8th, thieves, robbers, fascists, fools, madmen and enemies were added into the system. And so, the path of good governance did not become the safe and convenient path which many expected.Ranil W
This is a common situation which can be expected when a Party assumes power after a political movement of such proportions. Particularly, in a society like Sri Lanka where there is high political participation, any issues in the system will cause discomfort and irk members of society. And this, more or less, is the ongoing situation today.
The Prime Minister’s dominant strategic views which him and his team are committed towards establishing, is to stabilize the nation’s economy, protect democracy and the rule of law, and build a society where every member feels at ease and can live in peace and harmony.
Through the Prime Ministers broad and inclusive public process, the entire nation is set to be beneficiaries therein; which will result in short-term and long-term results. However, over the course of the last two years, there has been a growing disconnect between the United National Party, its members and leaders. As a result, the main critics of the government are the UNP-ers – much like the reaction of children towards a neglecting father. We have even seen these conditions in our villages, families, schools and social service workers. In my opinion, this is a strong failure of the system.
If this situation is left to continue, it will increase the risk of UNP-ers forsaking the voting polls in the future. Aside from the Prime Minister’s post in the Good Governance regime, the UNP possesses a little less than 50% of the government power. Also, a majority of those who hold government posts, officials and ministers, are those who championed the maintenance of the system which prevailed prior to January 8th. While it can be said that the UNP is having difficulty in realizing this reality, it is definitely something which they must face and understand immediately.

2016 Round-Up : Number of journalists detained worldwide continues to rise

2016 Round-Up :  Number of journalists detained worldwide continues to rise

Dec 13, 2016

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) is today releasing its annual worldwide round-up of journalists who are detained, held hostage or missing.

The numbers are rising dramatically. A total of 348 journalists are currently detained worldwide – 6% more than were detained at this time last year. The number of detained professional journalists in Turkey has risen 22% after quadrupling in the wake of the failed coup d’état in July.
More than 100 journalists and media contributors are now in Turkish jails. RSF has been able to establish a direct link between the arrest and the victim’s journalistic activities in 41 of these cases. President Erdogan’s increasing authoritarianism is being reflected in raids on media outlets that are designed to silence his critics.
Hundreds of Turkish journalist have been taken to court on charges of “insulting the president” or “terrorism.” Some have even been jailed without any charges brought against them. The number of cases of arbitrary imprisonment continues to rise.
Aside from Turkey, the three other biggest jailers of journalists are China, Iran and Egypt. They alone account for more than two thirds of the world’s detained journalists.
“The persecution of journalists around the world is growing at a shocking rate,” RSF secretary-general Christophe Deloire said. “At the gateway to Europe, an all-out witch-hunt has jailed dozens of journalists and has turned Turkey into the world’s biggest prison for the media profession. In the space of a year, the Erdogan regime has crushed all media pluralism while the European Union has said virtually nothing.”
Meanwhile, a total of 52 journalists are currently held hostage. This year, all of them are in conflict zones in the Middle East. Unsurprisingly, Syria and Iraq are among the most dangerous countries, with Islamic State alone holding 21 of these hostages.
In response to the ever-growing dangers for news and information providers, RSF is calling for the creation of the position of “Special Representative for the safety of journalists” directly attached to the office of the United Nations Secretary-General. The many UN resolutions on protecting journalists and combatting impunity for crimes against them have yet to produce satisfactory results.

Int. Bank to close the account of a former SL parliamentarian, notorious blue Brigand rogue immediately

- Decides its reputation is at stake due to this racketeer !

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -13.Dec.2016, 7.00AM) A reputed International bank has decided to close the account in Britain in which many millions of sterling pounds (illicit funds) have been  deposited  by a former  Sri Lankan parliamentarian – an ace rogue of the Blue Brigand .
The branch in  Britain of the reputed International bank  has decided to close this account irrespective of the amount of funds amassed by this culprit  because of the reputation risk faced by this  bank owing to this account holder.
Hence the bank has decided to close the account and send this ace rogue a check leaf for the amount of funds plus interest accrued .This racketeer has asked  for two weeks time to make arrangements to transfer the funds to another bank , but the international bank has refused to comply with the request.
The main reason that prompted the international bank to take this action was , this ace rogue had been receiving large amounts of money in bulk regularly  from Singapore to his illicit account. When it was probed how these funds were generated , suspicions have been aroused that this is money laundering , and these are funds earned via  underworld  dealings.
At the same time in Sri Lanka too cases have been filed against this ace rogue of the blue Brigand based on charges of misappropriating  many millions of rupees of Tsunami funds in association with the LTTE terrorists .One of the suspects has fled to UK , it is believed.

 Some time ago , when this rogue tried to enter Singapore he was detained at the Singapore airport and  interrogated for over 24 long hours by the Singaporean officials in connection with his money laundering activities .Finally this notorious crook was refused entry and deported to Sri Lanka. Subsequently however , this culprit struck  a clandestine deal with a chief of the good governance government who spoke to the Singapore government , and made arrangements to allow him entry to Singapore. When he was remanded too , he got the order vacated through a higher court violating the laws which are in existence dating as far back as 1833. 
The reputed international bank of Britain after taking into consideration all these details and his antecedence  , had decided no matter how much of funds the culprit has in his account  , if this account is allowed to be continued , the bank’s reputation is at risk . This  rogue is also an owner of a media Institution in SL .


---------------------------
by     (2016-12-13 01:32:15)