Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, December 2, 2016

PUCSL to remove legal barriers to roof top solar power


article_image
 

Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) has decided to remove the legal barriers for consumers who wish to enter into electricity generation from solar power.

Therefore, it has been proposed to exempt the electricity consumers, who generate electricity in small scale through rooftop solar power plants, from obtaining a license to sell electricity to the national grid.

According to the Sri Lanka Electricity Act, as amended, no party is allowed to generate and sell electricity to the national grid without a license granted by the PUCSL. But, with the new decision, any electricity consumer could install a solar system at his or her residence/ premises and generate and sell electricity based on the agreement which can be signed between the said consumer and corresponding licensee (CEB or LECO). All such parties will be exempted from the requirement of obtaining a generation license.

The decision came at a time, where the promotion of generation of electricity through renewable sources has become a major focus of the Government of Sri Lanka as well as the private sector investors. The government is currently in the process of implementing "Soorya Bala Sangramaya" (Battle for Solar Energy), a solar power generation program, to encourage people to generate electricity for themselves.

Under this programme any household or premises owner with valid electricity account can export the electricity generated through the solar system to the national grid under three schemes named, Net metering, Net Accounting and Net Plus.

PUCSL expects the new measure will promote the uptake of even more solar systems by the community.

"By granting the exemption, we are planning to minimize the barriers, and encourage the household, rooftop solar systems," Damitha Kumarasinghe, Director General of Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka said.

"This will offer better opportunity for Sri Lankan electricity consumers to access the environmental friendly and renewable sources of electricity for a reasonable investment," he added.

By promoting solar based generation among electricity consumers, it is expected to meet the electricity demand of day time through household based solar plants, replacing the thermal plants operates during such periods. This also facilitates management of water resources more efficiently and effectively.

Israel fires: Arabs donate wood to rebuild Haifa synagogue

Israelis look at the remains of their home, destroyed in last week's fires (AFP)
Friday 2 December 2016
Arab Israelis are donating timber to help rebuild a synagogue after it suffered extensive damage when wildfires ripped through much of Israel last week.
Walid Abu Ahmed and Ziad Yunis, who work in the timber supply trade, are donating wood and labour free of charge to help rebuild the Conservative Moriah synagogue, in the south of the mixed port city of Haifa.
Moriah, the only Conservative synagogue in Israel, was nearly destroyed when forest fires engulfed much of Israel’s third biggest city last week.
Fire engulfs a road in the port city of Haifa (AFP)
The synagogue’s rabbi, Dov Hayun, said that there would have been “nothing left” of the building had firefighters arrived just two minutes later.
Some of the building’s structure survived, but around 4,000 books were turned to ash by the blaze.
Hayon, who is in charge of the reconstruction efforts, had asked Abu Ahmed for a quote for what will likely be a costly project – but he was shocked when the merchants offered their services free of charge.
“I had tears in my eyes when I heard what was happening,” Hayon told Israeli news site Ynet News.
“It was so emotional to hear that Muslims were asking to donate to a Jewish synagogue. I’ve invited them to evening prayers to personally thank them,” he said.
'I had tears in my eyes when I heard what was happening'
- Dov Hayun, rabbi
Commenting on his decision, Abu Ahmed said: “Jews and Arabs live together in Haifa. We must continue with this coexistence and promote peace.
“We all want to live happy lives.”
He added that Islam is a religion of forgiveness, after a tense week for Israel-Palestinian relations which has seen many of the fires blamed on Palestinian citizens of Israel.
Police say many of the wildfires, dubbed the “Arson Intifida” by much of the Israeli press, were set deliberately, although they have admitted that this is based on “estimates” and are still investigating.
Israeli politicians reacted quickly to the fires, with prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu warning that “arson is terror” and would be punished as such, while Education Minister Naftali Bennett promised to build “more and bigger” settlements to replace those damaged by fire.
This article is available in French on Middle East Eye French edition.

Ontario lawmakers vote to smear BDS movement

Human rights defenders say Ontario’s latest anti-BDS measure is an attack on free speech rights in Canada. (Tony Webster)

Ali Abunimah-2 December 2016
Canadian human rights defenders are condemning a motion adopted by the Ontario legislature on Thursday that tars the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement as racist.
Independent Jewish Voices Canada (IJV) said it was “deeply concerned and disturbed” that the motion had been approved.
IJV had urged lawmakers to oppose the motion.
“It is outrageous for our elected representatives to publicly chastise human rights supporters, and falsely accuse them of hatred and bigotry for standing in solidarity with the victims of Israeli state violence and oppression,” IJV spokesperson Tyler Levitan said.
“The so-called debate in the Ontario legislature was little more than a slurry of lies and defamation against Palestinian human rights advocates,” Levitan added.
“It is defamatory to suggest that those advocating for human rights through nonviolent actions stand for hatred,” Atif Kubursi, of the Canadian Arab Federation, told media.
The non-binding measure describes BDS as a movement that encourages “hatred, hostility, prejudice, racism and intolerance” and promotes “the differential treatment of Israel.”
With the support of lawmakers from the provincial Liberal government and the right-wing opposition Progressive Conservatives, the motion passed by 49-5. Only the center-left New Democratic Party (NDP) voted against it. About half of all lawmakers did not take part in the vote.
By backing the motion, lawmakers ignored the advice of the Ontario Civil Liberties Association.
“We are not asking you to support BDS,” the group said in a letter to lawmakers on the eve of the vote. 
“We ask you to recognize, protect and advance the right of individual Ontarians to choose for themselves which social movements they will endorse, including BDS.”

Right to criticize

Introducing the measure in Thursday’s debate, Progressive Conservative lawmaker Gila Martow likened Palestinians and their allies struggling against Israel’s military occupation, settler-colonialism and systematic discrimination to white supremacists.
“We would not be here supporting a Ku Klux Klan on our campuses, so why are we allowing BDS movements and other anti-Jewish communities and anti-Israel organizations to have demonstrations and use our campuses, which are taxpayer-funded?” Martow said.
“New Democrats absolutely stand firmly opposed to any movement which encourages hate, prejudice, racism or intolerance in any way,” NDP deputy leader Jagmeet Singh responded.
“In our focus, we can’t be distracted by conflating criticisms of a government or criticisms of a government’s policies with anti-Semitism,” Singh added.
“People around the world and here in Canada have a right to dissent and to criticize,” Singh said, drawing an analogy with those criticizing Canada’s own atrocious human rights record, namely its “deplorable treatment of the indigenous community.”
“From direct genocides to a cultural genocide based on residential schools, the ongoing systemic discrimination of indigenous people and their deplorable conditions – people would be fully justified to raise a concern about the treatment of indigenous people,” Singh stated. “But it would absolutely not permit people to incite hatred against Canadians.”
Singh said that “peaceful demonstrations, discussions, debate, discourse, whether we agree with them or not, if they are expressed towards the criticism of a government or its policies, are absolutely, within our democracy.”

Union opposition

Rajean Hoilett, chair of the Canadian Federation of Students-Ontario, a union with 350,000 members in the country’s most populous province, said the motion “is quite obviously an attempt to silence activists, many of which are students.”
Hoilett vowed that students would not be deterred from advocating for Palestinian rights on campus.
Earlier, CUPE Ontario, a branch of the national public employees’ union representing 260,000 workers in the province, had also urged lawmakers to reject the motion as a violation of “the freedom of expression protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.”
Dozens of other groups have urged the Ontario government to reject efforts to defame and condemn Canadians working in solidarity with Palestinians.

Abusing claims of anti-Semitism

Much criticism of the anti-BDS motion has centered on its conflation of criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism.
Independent Jewish Voices said it was disturbed by “this defamatory motion’s endorsement of the Ottawa Protocol on Combating Anti-Semitism.”
“This protocol uses a widely discredited definition of anti-Semitism rejected by the European Union, which conflates opposition to political Zionism with anti-Semitism,” IJV stated. “This is an affront to those who have suffered under real anti-Semitism, and openly discriminates against Palestinian residents of Ontario who have been displaced and dispossessed as a result of political Zionism.”
“Putting all Jews into one basket that is represented by Israel is not only racist, it is also ignorant of Jewish history and Jewish tradition, which embrace and take pride in political and ideological diversity among Jewish communities around the world, including in Ontario,” the Israeli pro-BDS group Boycott from Within wrote in a letter to Ontario lawmakers.
“Canada has a history of structural and cultural violence, most blatantly manifest in racism and discrimination against many groups,” the Canadian Friends Service Committee noted in reaction to the vote. “This has certainly included a long and shameful tradition of anti-Semitism.”
The Quaker group recalled Canada’s refusal to accept more than a handful of Jewish refugees fleeing persecution in Europe and the existence for decades of “restrictive covenants” prohibiting the sale of property to Jews, Black people and others.
“For this reason it is deeply troubling when we see extremely important and powerful words like ‘anti-Semitism’ being compromised through misuse to promote a political agenda,” the Canadian Friends Service Committee stated.
The group accused the Ontario government of “taking the path laid out for it by lobbyists seeking to silence legitimate nonviolent protest.”

No change in law

The motion is a flexing of political muscle by the Israel lobby groups that promoted it, in particular the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, which was praised by several lawmakers during the debate.
It is also part of a wave of anti-Palestinian measures being promoted around the world by Israel and its lobby groups.
But it does not actually change the law in Ontario, unlike an anti-BDS bill introduced in May that would have created a government blacklist of supporters of Palestinian rights.
That bill was soundly rejected by the Ontario legislature, prompting Israel lobby groups to return with this week’s non-binding motion.
On Wednesday, Independent Jewish Voices spokesperson Tyler Levitan told The Electronic Intifada that even if the motion passed this week, “the victory in defeating the anti-BDS bill in May would still stand.”

U.N. states seeking resolution to demand end to fighting in Syria

A rebel fighter stands with his weapon near damaged buildings, and barricades with a Free Syrian Army flag drawn(C), in rebel-held besieged old Aleppo, Syria December 2, 2016. REUTERS/Abdalrhman IsmailA rebel fighter stands with his weapon near damaged buildings, and barricades with a Free Syrian Army flag drawn(C), in rebel-held besieged old Aleppo, Syria December 2, 2016. REUTERS/Abdalrhman Ismail


By Michelle Nichols | UNITED NATIONS- Sat Dec 3, 2016

The United Nations General Assembly began talks on Friday on a draft resolution that would demand an end to fighting in Syria amid frustration by some states and rights groups over U.N. Security Council deadlock on the nearly six-year conflict.
More than a third of the 193-member General Assembly this week asked for a formal meeting to be held on Syria. Diplomats said the meeting was likely to be held next week, when the Canadian-drafted resolution could be put to a vote.
General Assembly resolutions are non-binding, but can carry political weight.
"We believe that it is necessary for the General Assembly to express it collective will in accordance with the U.N. Charter and to take actions on the situation in Syria," Canada, Costa Rica, Japan and the Netherlands wrote to General Assembly President Peter Thomson on behalf of 74 countries.
The draft resolution would express outrage at the escalation of violence in Syria, particularly in Aleppo, where the United Nations says more than 250,000 people have been trapped for months. It would demand aid access, an end to indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks and an end to sieges.
The General Assembly held an informal meeting on Syria in October at the request of the same countries to gauge support for a rare emergency special session. Those states have now called for a formal meeting, not an emergency special session.
Under a 1950 resolution, an emergency special session can be called for the General Assembly to consider a matter "with a view to making appropriate recommendations to members for collective measures" if the Security Council fails to act.
Only 10 such sessions have been convened, and the last time the General Assembly met in such a session was in 2009 on Israeli actions in occupied Palestinian territories.
A coalition of more than 220 civil society groups from some 45 countries, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Oxfam and Save the Children, on Thursday declared that the Security Council had failed to protect the people of Syria and called for a General Assembly emergency special session.
Syrian ally Russia has vetoed five Security Council resolutions on Syria since 2011. China joined Moscow in vetoing the first four resolutions.
For several weeks the 15-member council has been discussing a resolution drafted by Egypt, Spain and New Zealand that would demand a 10-day truce in Aleppo. A vote has not yet been scheduled and Russia currently opposes the text.
(Reporting by Michelle Nichols; Editing by Tom Brown)

The Biggest Election Surprise of the Year May Actually Be in West Africa

The Biggest Election Surprise of the Year May Actually Be in West Africa

BY ROBBIE GRAMER-DECEMBER 2, 2016

Gambian President Yahya Jammeh once vowed to rule his country for “one billion years.” He was only 999,999,978 years off. On Friday, Jammeh lost his country’s general election to opposition leader Adama Barrow after 22 years in power.

The defeat comes as a huge shock — not only because an unlikely opposition leader ousted an authoritarian president with a penchant for coups, but also because the president accepted the loss. “It’s really unique that someone who has been ruling this country for so long has accepted defeat,” Gambian electoral commission chief Alieu Momar Njie told reporters.

Barrow earned 45.5 percent of the vote, while Jammeh trailed with 36.7 percent, according to the BBCThe surprise win by an opposition figure — and Jammeh’s even more surprising acceptance of his loss — is a historic moment for the tiny West African nation, which hasn’t had a smooth power transfer since gaining independence in 1965.

Jammeh has ruled Africa’s smallest nation with an iron fist since first wresting power in a coup in 1994. His repressive regime impoverished an already underdeveloped country; the poverty rate that has hovered around 50 percent for years, according to the World Bank. Since taking power, he’s unleashed his security forces to torture, intimidate, arrest, and suppress dissenters to keep his grip on power, according to Human Rights Watch.

Instances of dictators losing their own ‘window dressing’ election are rare. But there was a perfect storm of various factors that turned the tide in Gambian opposition’s favor, said Jeff Smith, founder of Vanguard Africa.

“First, the opposition was unified and energized in a way that they had never been before,” Smith told Foreign Policy. The government’s brutal crackdown on anti-government protests in April and May garnered international scrutiny and galvanized various opposition factions. “It was the longest and most defiant act of public disobedience the country witnessed since Jammeh came to power,” Smith said.
Then there’s Europe’s refugee crisis. “Gambia plays an outsized role in the crisis,” Smith said. “It’s the fourth largest ‘exporter’ of refugees to Italy this year, despite being one of Africa’s smallest countries.” This raised Europe’s awareness of the plights of Gambians and ratcheted up international scrutiny on Jammeh’s regime.

And then, there’s the enigmatic dictator himself. Jammeh’s brutal and bizarre antics have drawn an international media spotlight that both enraged his people and energized the opposition over the years. It starts with his public proclamations. He led state-sanctioned ‘witch hunts and threatened to personally slit the throats of gay men in a public speech.

He also isolated Gambia abroad. When he won reelection in 2011 in results that many international observers questioned, he told critics to “go to hell.” In 2013, he withdrew from the Commonwealth, the 54-nation group of former British colonies, after the United Kingdom’s Foreign Office released a report charging Gambia with human rights abuses. Jammeh also pulled Gambia out of the International Criminal Court for alleged bias against African nations; one of his ministers called it the “International Caucasian Court” when explaining the government’s decision to withdraw.

Suffice it to say, Gambians were clearly ready for change. And facing a wave of popular dissent and international pressures, he had to relent.

“Jammeh faced such a surprising groundswell of support for the opposition that they couldn’t fudge the numbers to the point where they could make it credible that they won,” Smith said. That hasn’t stopped dictators before, but international pressure made have tipped the scale, particularly pressure from his own neighborhood of relatively successful West African democracies. “For a number of years, the regional leaders have become fed up with Jammeh,” Smith said. “He’s a black eye on a region that’s performed overwhelmingly well writ large.”

The United States and European Union also made clear an intent to slap sanctions on the country if Jammeh stole the elections again, as did neighboring countries like Senegal, which surrounds the tiny sliver of land that comprises Gambia. This, coupled with a determined and unified opposition, convinced the president to accept his loss.

Jammeh, to defend his dictatorial cred, did try to make things difficult for the opposition as his country headed to the polls. In a classically authoritarian move, his regime banned internet and international phone calls when the country took to the polls. He also barred EU election observers from monitoring the process. But it didn’t deter Gambians from voting him out.

His successor is a relatively new and inexperienced figure in Gambian politics. Adama Barrow is a real estate manager with little government experience (though he was reportedly a former retail store security guard in London before he threw his hat into the ring of Gambian politics.) He wasn’t supposed to be the face of the opposition, but Jammeh threw many other would-be frontrunners in jail. “He was thrust into this position because the leaders of party he’s a member of, the United Democratic Party, are all in prison,” Smith said.

When Barrow takes office, he has a tough road ahead. The first item on the agenda is healing a nation that has suffered a traumatic dictatorship for over two decades. And then there’s the administrative challenges.

“Jammeh ran Gambia as a mafia state,” said Smith. “The state does not exist without him, so there’s a huge void that Barrow has to fill.” He said there’s little economic opportunity but Gambians are hopeful for the change new leadership could usher in.

That void is a particularly deep and bizarre rabbit hole, starting quite simply with Jammeh’s resume. Officially, it painstakingly lists some 80 awards he’s received as president, ranging from the “Admiral in the Great Navy of the State of Nebraska” (yes, that one is real) to an “Honorary Degree in Herbal and Homeopathic Medicine” from Belgium’s Jean Monnet European University, to the “Most Student Loving and Innovative President in Africa” award to the “Kentucky Colonel Award” from the governor of Kentucky.

Oh, and don’t forget that Jammeh can cure asthma and (at least, he claims) AIDS — but don’t think that makes him a witch. “I am not a witch doctor, and in fact you cannot have a witch doctor. You are either a witch or a doctor,” he said, when his purported medical miracles came to light.

And if titles alone won elections, Jammeh would have clinched a win; his formal title is His Excellency Sheikh Professor Alhaji Doctor Yahya AJJ Jammeh Babili Mansa. (He added Babili Mansa, meaning ‘conqueror of rivers,’ to his title in 2015).

A 2014 coup attempt adds another strange layer to his story. The coup ringleaders were a Texan real estate developer and a Minnesotan computer studies teacher who served 10 years in the U.S. Army. Because of course. The FBI later arrested the two men, both U.S. citizens of Gambian descent.

None of Jammeh’s awards, strange antics, or his ability to dodge coup attempts, curried favor with his people, as the voters showed Friday. It’s an upset few — including Barrow himself — expected. But international scrutiny on the bizarre and brutal dictator may have been the final nail in the coffin of Jammeh’s reign.

“For years, the opposition struggled and put their lives on the line without anyone taking note,” Smith said. But when international media shed light on the Gambian leader, they also brought the plight of his people to light.

“The opposition wouldn’t back down,” Smith said. “This time, they knew the world was watching.”
Photo credit: MARCO LONGARI/AFP/Getty Images

An inmate stands in the south end hallway of the Central Detention Facility in the District. (Linda Davidson/The Washington Post)--Joeann Lewis, with the ashes of her niece, Deeniquia Dodds, a transgender woman killed in Northeast Washington in July, allegedly by Shareem Hall and a co-conspirator. (Linda Davidson/The Washington Post)
 

SECOND-CHANCE CITY | This is part of a continuing series that will examine issues related to repeat violent offenders in the District of Columbia. Part I Part II

Hundreds of criminals sentenced by D.C. judges under an obscure local law crafted to give second chances to young adult offenders have gone on to rob, rape or kill residents of the nation’s capital.
The original intent of the law was to rehabilitate inexperienced criminals under the age of 22. The District’s Youth Rehabilitation Act allows for shorter sentences for some crimes and an opportunity for offenders to emerge with no criminal record. But a Washington Post investigation has found a pattern of violent offenders returning rapidly to the streets and committing more crimes. Hundreds have been sentenced under the act multiple times.
The District’s Youth Rehabilitation Act offers lenient sentences to offenders under 22 years old. But the Post found that at least 120 people sentenced under the Act since 2010 have gone on to be charged with murder. (Video: Whitney Shefte/Photo: Linda Davidson/The Washington Post)

In dozens of cases, D.C. judges were able to hand down Youth Act sentences shorter than those called for under mandatory minimum laws designed to deter armed robberies and other violent crimes. The criminals have often repaid that leniency by escalating their crimes of violence upon release.
In 2013, four masked men entered the home of a family in Northeast Washington, held them at gunpoint and ransacked the house. One of the invaders, Shareem Hall, was sentenced under the Youth Act. He was released on probation in 2015.
Almost exactly a year later, Hall and a co-conspirator shot a 22-year-old transgender woman, Deeniquia Dodds, during a robbery in the District, according to charging documents. It is unclear who pulled the trigger. Police said the pair were targeting transgender females.
Dodds died nine days later.
“You’re telling me you can come back out on the streets and rob again, hold people hostage again, kill again — because of the Youth Act?” said Joeann Lewis, Dodds’s aunt.

Read More

Trump allies fight election recount 'mayhem' across Rust Belt

Michigan attorney general sues as campaign groups fight Wisconsin recount and Trump attorneys say Pennsylvania electors won’t be able to meet voting deadline
 Michigan’s attorney general, Bill Schuette, said in a lawsuit that Jill Stein’s recount request in the state was ‘dilatory and frivolous’ and would waste millions of dollars. Photograph: Carlos Osorio/AP
-Friday 2 December 2016 
Efforts to have the presidential election vote reviewed in states where Donald Trump narrowly defeated Hillary Clinton came under attack on Friday, as Trump allies asked courts to stop recounts in three states.
Legal submissions were made to authorities in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin by Republicans who argued that recounts requested by Jill Stein, the Green party candidate, should not be allowed.
Michigan’s attorney general, Bill Schuette, said in a lawsuit that Stein’s “dilatory and frivolous” recount would cost the public millions of dollars, and could result in the state being unable to cast its votes in the electoral college.
In Pennsylvania, attorneys for Trump accused Stein of “bringing mayhem” to the election process despite “being no more than a blip on the electoral radar” and having no evidence that the vote had been sabotaged by foreign hackers.
Two pro-Trump campaign groups meanwhile asked a federal court in Madison, Wisconsin, to bring a halt to an ongoing recount in the state, which was prompted by a petition from Stein that was accepted by election authorities last week. 
Stein defended her push for recounts and pledged to not back down. “In an election already tainted by suspicion, some coming from Donald Trump himself, verifying the vote is a commonsense procedure that would put all concerns around voter disenfranchisement to rest,” she said in a statement.
The Green party candidate requested recounts in the three states on behalf of a coalition of election security experts, who were concerned that the electoral process could have been disrupted by foreign hackers.
They acted following warnings from US intelligence agencies during the election campaign that Russian hackers were behind the thefts of emails from Democratic party officials and had been detected intruding into the voter registration systems of several American states.
Opponents to Stein’s efforts on Friday all pointed to the absence of any clear evidence that the vote had been skewed by external forces. Trump won slim victories over Clinton in all three states after Clinton had led in opinion polls for several months.
According to the latest tallies compiled by state authorities, Trump won Michiganby 10,704 votes (0.2%), Pennsylvania by 46,765 (0.8%) and Wisconsin by 22,177 (0.7%).
Stein and her allies have suggested that hackers may have downloaded state voter registration databases and filed bogus absentee ballots, or tampered in some way with the electronic machines that register votes. But they have not offered proof pointing to either theory.
The Obama administration has said it is confident that no cyber-hacking interfered with election day and that the result was “the will of the American people”. A group of Democratic senators has, however, asked the president to declassify more information about Russia’s involvement in the US election process.
The Republican efforts to derail Stein’s recounts raised a wide range of objections on Friday. Schuette, the Michigan attorney general, homed in on Michigan law holding that a candidate must show that she or he was “aggrieved” by the result in order to prompt a recount.
“Stein has zero chance of winning Michigan’s electoral votes; she cited no evidence of fraud or mistake in the canvass of votes; and she has offered no argument as to how she is aggrieved by the electoral counts,” Schuette, a Republican who supported Trump’s campaign for the presidency, said in a lawsuit to a state appeals court.
Stein said in a statement that Schuette’s lawsuit was a “politically motivated” attempt to prevent checks on the integrity of the vote count in the state. Trump’s campaign itself filed a petition in Michigan on Thursday in opposition to the recount.
In Pennsylvania, attorneys for Trump and the state Republican party argued in a court filing that Stein’s efforts placed the state “at grave risk” of not being able to meet a 13 December deadline for settling disagreements before submitting results for the electoral college vote.
Stein’s request, according to the lawsuit, “has not alleged any specific acts of fraud or tampering in Pennsylvania, much less that any such fraud increased the votes of President-elect Trump, let alone to such degree that it affected the outcome of the election.”
The Republicans also used Stein’s own filings against her. Stein asked the state court to put her petition contesting the election on hold pending the discovery by recounters of hacking. But state law bars such a “fishing expedition”, the Republicans said.
In Wisconsin, the Great America Pac and Stop Hillary Pac cited the US supreme court’s order to abandon recounts in Florida after the 2000 presidential election to argue that Wisconsin’s present recount violated the equal protection clause of the US constitution.
They also said the recount could not be “accurately and carefully” completed before the 13 December deadline for Wisconsin to settle disagreements before presenting its vote for the electoral college. The campaign groups asked the court to stop the recount “to prevent careless mistakes” that would taint the election’s results and “cast a pall” over Trump’s victory.
Michigan authorities were meeting on Friday morning to discuss Stein’s request and opposition from Trump and the state attorney general. Recounting, which was due to begin on Friday, has been placed on hold by the Michigan secretary of state.

Viva Fidel

fidel_last_respect
 The impact of Fidel’s humanitarian reach stretched as far as Africa where Cuban’s lost their lives in the fight against brutal regimes supported by apartheid South Africa and western powers.
cropped-guardian_english_logo-1.pngby Gaetano Greco and Michael Colin Cooke-Dec 1, 2016

( December 1, 2016, Melbourne, Sri Lanka Guardian) The passing of a political giant like Fidel Castro amongst the political minnows that swarm and blight our political and cultural landscape deserves more attention.
The dismissiveness of our mainstream media that has pedaled out the usual cold war rhetoric does not go beyond the superficial cliché and critique of him since the Kennedy years. Like all-important personages in history he was human and his mistakes (many of which he acknowledged and tried to rectify) need to be set against the colossal magnitude of the legacy he has left behind.
We in Australia unlike Cuba live in a country that is not only over endowed with natural abundance but are also one of the richest countries on the planet. We also freely trade with the US, our closest ally which is still the biggest economy in the world. Yet we cannot find the money and political will to fund a proper health and education system and live in a society where the homeless, the poor and the underpaid are increasing daily while the rich just get richer and seem indifferent to the fate of others.
Cuba shows that even after decades of sustained external pressure, i.e. political isolation and destabilsation and assassination attempts on Fidel life; terrorist attacks on civilian planes and hotels, devastating hurricanes – not to mention a 50 year crippling immoral embargo imposed by the US; it was able to provide decent housing, education and health to its citizens. Additionally, its international standing in training and sending many thousands of doctors to developing counties over the years remains exemplary and completely blights Australia’s stingy overseas aid program. Just to our north in East Timor over 1200 Cuban doctors have brought health services to the population, some in the most remote areas of the Country.
The impact of Fidel’s humanitarian reach stretched as far as Africa where Cuban’s lost their lives in the fight against brutal regimes supported by apartheid South Africa and western powers. In fact, Cuba’s critical contribution in Angola and Namibia is attributed to helping defeat the apartheid regime in South Africa. In recognition of this, Nelson Mandela visited Fidel before any other world leader after he was released from jail.
That is only part of the legacy of Fidel Castro that we should be discussing, arguing about and preserving not the bullshit clichés we have endured from our capitalist press.
So that is why we mourn and salute the life and times of Fidel Castro Ruiz – his example serves as a beacon for activists for all ages – history will not only absolve him but also honor his contribution to humankind

Fidel Castro – the Champion of Public Health


article_image
 
The world mourns the passing away of Fidel Castro. The world has lost one of the most illustrious leaders of our time. As much as the name Fidel Castro is synonymous with Cuba, Cuba is synonymous with good public health. Fidel was a great ruler and a great leader to the Cuban people. Equally, he was a leader par excellence to the world of public health.

As Dr. Dayan Jayathilake said in his weekend article to "The Island", Fidel was the last of the epic heroes of our time that include Mao Tse-tung, Ho Chi Min, Josip Tito and Che Guevara. And the commonalities among them were great leaders, revolutionaries, and most of all, were visionaries who combined their ideal with action and changed the world they inherited.

The life and times of Fidel Castro

Fidel Castro Ruz was born on 13 August 1926 into a wealthy family in Birán, Oriente, in the eastern part of Cuba. He was a lawyer by profession. On 26 August 1953 he led an armed struggle against the country’s military dictator Fulgencio Batista, and was captured in a failed attack on Moncada Barracks in Santiago de Cuba. This attack famously signifies the beginning of Cuban revolution. After a trial he was sentenced to 15 years’ jail. During his inmate days, Fidel was a voracious reader, and read as much as 16 hours a day. In the face of mounting protest against his imprisonment Fidel was freed in May 1955.

He fled to Mexico, where he regrouped his fellow compatriots including his own brother Raul (the present president of Cuba) and his good buddy Argentine Ernesto Che Guevara. On 2 December 1956, they sailed from Mexico on board the famous yacht "Granma", invaded Cuba for the second time. This attack too was a failure, led to death or capture of most of the invaders. But Fidel and survivors went hiding in Sierra Maestra mountains, from where they launched a guerrilla war against the Batista regimen.

On 1 January 1959, exactly five years five months and five days after the Moncada attack, Batista regimen fell in the face of advancing rebel forces, and Batista fled to the Dominican Republic. Fidel became the Prime Minister of Cuba on 13 February 1959. He adopted a centrally planned economy with "pro-poor" policies. He introduced sweeping land reforms making peasants the owners of land. He nationalized businesses, which were mainly American owned. This brought in stiff opposition to the new government from the US. Soon Fidel espoused a "pro-Soviet" line. The growing antagonism against Cuba by the US government reached its zenith when the US trained mercenaries invaded Cuba in an infamous unsuccessful "Bay of pigs" attack on 17 April 1961.

Consequent to waned relations between the two countries, US in February 1962 imposed a full economic embargo against Cuba (topping up the partial embargo that was in effect since October 1960). This embargo, commonly known as the "blockade", is in existence to this day (despite president Obama’s call to end it during his visit to Havana in March this year, which has just limited to words).

In October 1965, Fidel founded the Cuban Communist Party. To this day Cuba has a one-party system with a parliament (National Assembly of People’s Power) comprising 612 members, representing municipalities, trade unions and students.

An internationalist in every sense, Fidel during his heydays, militarily supported democratically elected regimens and leftist guerilla armies in various parts of the world, who were fighting oppressive forces. Among these a long drawn battle in Angola, Namibia (South African border war during apartheid time), Congo, Bolivia (where Che Guevara died fighting), Ethiopia, Nicaragua and El Salvador stand out.

Fidel was also a frontline leader of the Non Aligned Movement (NAM) since its inception, Cuba being the first Latin American country to join the Movement. Havana hosted the NAM summit twice in 1979 and 2006, the only country to do so.

The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 plunged Cuba into a grave economic crisis. Double burdened by the economic embargo, Fidel and the Cuban leadership faced a tough time in the immediate aftermath years. But through prudent economic management coupled with some austerity measures (sparing children) and "reforms" Cuba came out of the calamity in double quick time. In this regard, Cuba relied heavily on its educated and skilled professionals and advancement it has gained in technology, especially in the field of bio technology.

Later speaking to director Bill Fletcher, in the documentary "Fidel Castro: the Untold Story", Fidel admitted the government experimented certain reforms during the "special period". But the bottom line was that it didn’t compromise any of its social development programmes. Cuba went into limited partnerships with Canada and some European countries to develop its infrastructure (in tourism industry) and research capacity, especially in the field of biotechnology. Capital, market and technology were the areas Cuba went into partnership with its Western allies.

Fidel is also famous for his long speeches. In June 2005, I together with Jayathilake de Silva and Subramaniam Nagendra travelled to Havana to attend the International Conference against Terrorism, for Truth and Justice, where Fidel spoke for three long days. (Among the speakers at the conference were Daniel Ortega the incumbent president of Nicaragua, and Schafik Jorge Handal, the famous Salvadoran guerilla leader).

Few days before his 80th birthday, on 31 July 2006, Fidel with signs of failing health, handed over the leadership of Cuba to his brother Raul. Since then he has been a prolific writer, writing articles under the theme "Reflections by Fidel".

In 2006, the year Fidel resigned from leadership, Cuba was the world's only nation that met the United Nations Development Programme's definition of sustainable development, with an ecological footprint of less than 1.8 hectares per capita and a Human Development Index of over 0.8

Fidel Castro died on 25 November in Havana, at the age of 90.
Cuban legacy of Public Health

Fidel always set great store by developing a sound healthcare system in Cuba. By the end of the Cuban revolution (in 1959) healthcare was limited only to the rich and was almost nonexistent to the poor in the rural areas of the country. Fidel believed funding for health as a human right as well as an investment, a worthy investment towards having a healthy workforce and student population. Today, Cuban government spends 11.1% of its GDP on health (on comparison, meager 1.3% by the Sri Lankan government).

A sound primary healthcare structure where efficient family physician - public health nurse combination together with a comprehensive paramedical team remains the cornerstone of Cuba’s public health system. In the formative years valuable theoretical inputs were provided by Che, the Minister of Industries, who was also a doctor himself. Health teams were sent to the hitherto underserved rural areas of the country, where sugarcane and tobacco plantations were in abundance. Immunization campaigns were started against the childhood killer diseases like polio and measles with resounding results. A healthier populace ensued, who contributed immensely to Cuba’s growing economy, which soon became one of the world’s foremost sugar producers.

Soon, the impact of the widespread public health programme established in the post-revolution Cuba had telltale effects on the country’s health indicators. Country’s Infant Mortality Rate almost halved from 37.3 (per 1,000 live births) in 1960 to 19.6 in 1980. In 2010 it stood at 4.5; (the average for the European Union that year was 4.2). The under five mortality, another robust indicator of a country’s health status, dropped from 43.7 in 1970 to 24.2 in 1980, and further to 6.0 in 2010. The life expectancy grew from 70 in 1970, to 73.5 in 1980, and further to 78 in 2010. Amazingly, its doctor to population ratio from 1: 1,400 in 1970, rose to 1: 640 in 1980, and in 2010 stood at 1: 170 (or 590 doctors per 100,000 population), the country with the highest doctor population ratio in the world. (You may notice most of these figures are unavailable for 1960, the year following the fall of Batista rule. Only since then the health system was structured and record systematic keeping commenced in Cuba).

By 1990s Cuba has eliminated polio and measles from its shores. It also has the most effective dengue control programme and the lowest HIV/ AIDS rate in the Americas. In the recent years, it has the highest rates of treatment and control of hypertension in the world, and has reduced cardiovascular mortality rate by 45%. There is many a leaf from the Cuban public health book the world could adopt in effective NCD control, and for that, the World Health "pundits" should be ready to do that.
Medical Internationalism

As in defence, health is another field Cuba excelled in "internationalism". This holds water for both training and service delivery in healthcare. Medical internationalism is part of Cuba’s foreign policy as well.

The world’s largest medical school, Latin American School of Medicine (ELAM), established in Havana in 1998, is a classic case in point. Medical education at ELAM is absolutely free, from tuition, to books, to lodging, to food. At present, around 20,000 students from over 100 countries around the world (including the US) study medicine and allied sciences at ELAM. (Even before the establishment of ELAM, the Havana Medical School provided free medical education for students from around the world for decades).
Medical diplomacy - Cuba's most important export commodity

Deploying Cuban healthcare workers in friendly countries that were in need began in the early 1960s when Cuba dispatched small medical brigades to Algeria, at the time of that country’s civil war. This trend later continued in Guinea-Bissau and Angola. In some of these countries, later, Cuban doctors outnumbered the local doctors and Cubans organized the healthcare systems.

At present there are around 50,000 Cuban professionals working in over 100 countries around the world, as part of various bi-lateral arrangements of their government. Of them, 30,000 are health professionals, and 25,000 are doctors. It is said that Cuba alone provides more healthcare workers to the developing world than all G8 countries put together. (In Sri Lanka too Cuban doctors were manning health services in number of rural and war stricken areas till the turn of the century. This writer too had the opportunity to work with a team of Cuban doctors in Polonnaruwa Base Hospital, in the mid 90s).

Among the other things, disaster management became an avant-garde of Cuban Medical Internationalism. Cuban medical missions were swift to move into the disaster hit regions of the world, where they promptly initiated rescue and healthcare programmes. This is happening since 1960s, and happened in Chile, Nicaragua, Iran and Pakistan following devastating earthquakes, in Venezuela following a disastrous mudslide, in Honduras, Guatemala and Haiti subsequent to hurricanes, and in Sri Lanka and Indonesia aftermath the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami. Our memories are still fresh about the Cuban presence in Koggala following the tsunami, where their medical team spent an extended period providing healthcare to the villagers under very trying conditions. (In August 2005, following Hurricane Katrina that devastated New Orleans, Cuba was prepared to send a team of 1,500 doctors in a humanitarian mission to the US, but the offer was turned down by the Bush administration).

Cuba’s Medical Aid to Venezuela

In the early 2000s, in a novel programme called "oil for doctors", Cuba provided Venezuela with 31,000 doctors, dentists and paramedical staff to provide healthcare and train 40,000 Venezuelan medical personnel. In exchange, Venezuela provided Cuba with 100,000 barrels of oil per day.

Operation Miracle

In July 2008 Fidel and his then Venezuelan counterpart the late Hugo Chávez launched another out-of-the-box programme named, Operation Miracle to expand health care services in Venezuela. Restoring the vision of millions of low-income patients was the initial purpose of the mission. This initiative later extended to other parts of the Latin America, Caribbean and Africa (and rest of the world) as well. These programmes are still underway.
Humanitarian assistance to HIV hit Africa

In another similar initiative Cuba sent medical assistance by way of doctors, nurses and pharmaceuticals to a number of HIV/AIDS worst hit sub-Saharan African nations. Started in the early 2000s this programme is still continuing. Cuba, the first country in the world to eliminate mother to child transmission of HIV has state-of-the-art expertise in handling HIV, both in hospitals and community. Once in Africa, Cuban doctors’ role was not limited to the provision of HIV care. They also helped establishing health infrastructure and programmes in those countries. Now that some parts of the sub-Saharan Africa have checked the mother to child transmission of HIV effectively, the worth of Cuban intervention stands out obviously.

Later, Cuban medical assistance was also extended to curtail the spreading Ebola epidemic in West Africa with resounding success.
Above all, the most striking thing about the development of the post revolution Cuba is the fact that it took place in the midst of a damning embargo imposed by the US, almost throughout its entirety. The embargo prohibits any form of trade with Cuba, travel, employment and whatnot. Unacceptability of this embargo in today’s economic and political terms goes without saying as the vote against it in the UN has always been won resoundingly by Cuba. In 2015, 191 countries voted against the embargo, while only two (US and Israel) voted in favour. Yet, the embargo continues!
When all what is said here and more speaks for itself about the role Fidel and Cuba played towards the upliftment of downtrodden masses of Cuba and the rest of the world, some elements in Miami and their lackeys in the Western media continue beating and insulting Fidel, even after his death. The answer for that lies in the famous quote by none other than the former US president Franklin D. Roosevelt, which goes as "judge someone by the enemies he has made."

While Cubans mourn the death of their beloved leader Fidel, there are many reasons for the world to celebrate his life.

Viva Fidel! Viva Cuba! Viva la Revoluсion!