Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Stand up for someone's rights today

Stand up for someone's rights today. © EPA/Yoan Valat

HRDay2016
“Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home - so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. […]
Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world.”

– Eleanor Roosevelt

Many of us are fearful about the way the world is heading. Extremist movements subject people to horrific violence. Conflicts and deprivation are forcing families from their homes. Climate change darkens our horizons – and everywhere, it seems, anxieties are deepening. Humane values are under attack, and we feel overwhelmed – unsure what to do or where to turn.

Messages of intolerance and hatred prey on our fears. They are spread by people who seek power, deploying twisted logic and false promises, and fabricating outright lies. Their narratives speak to selfishness, separatism – a distorting, narrow view of the world. Little by little, this toxic tide of hatred is rising around us, and the deep and vital principles that safeguard peaceful societies risk being swept away.

We must draw the line – and we can. There is another way.  It starts with all of us taking practical steps to reaffirm our common humanity.

The UN Human Rights Office upholds values that are the roots of peace and inclusion. We advocate practical solutions to fear and injustice, so governments protect the rights of all their people in line with international law.  We monitor their policies and call them out if they fall short. We stand for greater freedoms. Stronger respect. More compassion. 

Join us. Help break the toxic patterns of a fearful world and embark on a more peaceful, more sustainable future. We don’t have to stand by while the haters drive wedges of hostility between communities – we can build bridges.  Wherever we are, we can make a real difference. In the street, in school, at work, in public transport; in the voting booth, on social media, at home and on the sports field.

Wherever there is discrimination, we can step forward to help safeguard someone's right to live free from fear and abuse. We can raise our voices for decent values. We can join others to publicly lobby for better leadership, better laws and greater respect for human dignity.

The time for this is now. “We the peoples” can take a stand for rights. Let us know what you're doing, and we will gather your stories, and amplify your voice. Local actions can add up to a global movement. And together, we can take a stand for more humanity.

It starts with each of us.

Stand up for someone's rights today.
Colombo Telegraph

By Hafeel Farisz –November 22, 2016
Hafeel Farisz
Hafeel Farisz
The recent fire at the Fashion Bug store in Pepiliyana has given rise to new questions. For anyone who has been following the ‘post war Sinhala Buddhist’ phenomenon, it shouldn’t come as a surprise. Although conclusions are yet to be reached, and investigations into the cause of the fire are yet to be conducted- the voice of the company speaking to the media that night was telling. “We have suffered in the past, there is reason to believe that there was foul play. There was nothing to indicate an electric short”, was what he said.
The last time the store caught fire, in May 2013, there was no suspicion. It came under attack. The catalyst that was used to further the narrative of course was a personal dispute. A narrative the media and the government played on. I remember visiting the place in order to report the incident. Upon inquiry Sinhalese neighbors who lived around the area, kept telling me how the crowd had gathered at the Temple nearby. That while the mob had organized themselves and started walking towards the store, the Temple Bell was rung. The Temple Bell (Gantaraya) was rung initially to gather the crowd there too. These were all edited out of the narrative. Truth sometimes is selective. Criminal Proceedings were not instituted, and the owner of the store was pressurized to come to a settlement, which he did. He had no option but to, he was to recall later.
BBS Monks
When the Anti-Muslim riots broke out in mid June 2014, the then government and the media played the same role. The selective truth narrator. To this day, not a single person has been held responsible for a riots which doused an entire village in flames. No one has been held responsible for the torching of the No Limit store in Panadura. There were 5 deaths. Every source including the officers of the Special Task Force (STF) who were on duty that evening, when the rally was conducted told me how the riots were in fact ‘organized’. It was no sudden reaction as was made to believe. The intelligence officers on the ground were aware of the plan. The foot soldiers of the STF had also joined the mob and played an integral part of the in the ensuing carnage. None of them made it to the official narration. The media played dumb. The reason given- the assault of a Buddhist monk in the town- was a lie. The government knew it was. It never happened. The Minister of External Affairs G.L Peiris told me that it was a lie they played on. So did the Attorney General at the time. In an interview conducted by me in the immediate aftermath of the riots, the then Defense Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa was caught lying, multiple times. The intelligence officers on the ground and the Police knew no such ‘assault’ took place. But a narrative was fed and was eagerly bought too. The Post War Sinhala Buddhist believed it. Rejoiced in it and blamed the attacked. The media, oh well, how could we forget the role it played. Malinda Senevirathne remained the only editor who was willing to publish the truth, which he did. But it fell on deaf ears.
யாழ் பல்கலை விடுதிக்குள் நுழைந்து மரண அச்சுறுத்தல் விடுத்த காவல்துறையினர்

யாழ் பல்கலை விடுதிக்குள் நுழைந்து மரண அச்சுறுத்தல் விடுத்த காவல்துறையினர்
23-Nov-2016

யாழ் பல்கலைக்கழக மாணவர் விடுதிக்குள் நேற்று இரவு 11.48 மணியளவில்  திடீரென நுழைந்த காவல்துறையினர் மாணவர்களை மிரட்டியதுடன், மரண அச்சுறுத்தலும் விடுத்துள்ளனர். 

குறித்த சம்பவம் தொடர்பாக யாழ்ப்பாணப் பல்கலைக்கழக மாணவர் ஒன்றியத் தலைவர் ரஜீவன் தெரிவிக்கையில்,

நேற்றைய தினம் மாணவன் ஒருவனின் பிறந்தநாளைக் கொண்டாடுவதற்காக ஏற்பாடுகளைச் செய்துவிட்டு ஏனைய மாணவர்களையும் நிகழ்வுக்கு அழைத்தபோது, அங்கே திடீரென காவல்துறையினர் உள்நுளைந்தனர்.

உள்நுளைந்த காவல்துறையினர் மாணவர்களை அச்சுறுத்தியதுடன் 119 என்ற இலக்கத்திலிருந்து தமக்கு அழைப்பு வந்ததன் காரணத்தினாலே தாம் இங்கு வருகை தந்ததாக இராணுவத்தினர் தெரிவித்ததாக ஒன்றியத் தலைவர் தெரிவித்தார்.

இந்நிலையில், அங்கு வந்த காவல்துறையினரிடம், பல்கலைக்கழகத்துக்குள் எவ்வாறு நீங்கள் துப்பாக்கியுடன் வரமுடியும் என நான் வினவியபோது, துப்பாக்கியை நீட்டி சுட்டு விடுவோம் என காவல்துறையினர் மாணவர்களை அச்சுறுத்தினர்.

அத்துடன், தனதும் தனது நண்பன் ஒருவரின் பெயர் விலாசங்களையும் பெற்றுச் சென்றதாகவும் ரஜிவன் தெரிவித்துள்ளார்.

இதுதொடர்பில் விடுதி பொறுப்பாளரிடமும் பல்கலைக்கழக துணைவேந்தரிடமும் முறைப்பாடுகள் செய்யப்படுள்ளதாகவும் தெரிவிக்கப்படுகிறது 

untitled-2logoThursday, 24 November 2016

Radical Buddhist monks threatening demolition of majority Muslim suburbs of Colombo and employing violent, racist and threatening rhetoric against public officials continue to enjoy impunity under the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe Government, which was swept into office on a wave of minority angst and frustration about the meteoric rise of hardline Sinhalese groups under the Rajapaksa administration. As religious tensions mount, remarks by the Minister of Justice have drawn sharp criticism from Muslim political leaders and civil society groups, and also sparked fears of continued Government patronage for ideologies of hate and fear propagated by hardline groups

new-photo-12
BBS General Secretary Galagoda aththe Gnansara at the Sugathadasa Stadium during a rally to welcome Myanmar's hardline 969 monk Ashin Wirathu 
Even as calls mount for the arrest of Gnanasara Thero over his remarks about Razik’s arrest and threats to annihilate Maligawatte, the monk breezed into Parliament on Tuesday (22) for an audience with Minister for Buddha Sasana and Justice Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe

Richard de Zoysa : The other side of paradise



Uditha Devapriya-Wednesday, November 23, 2016 
The first thing that struck you about him was his voice. Polished, elegant, and not a little jarring, it helped explained his figure, which was at once filled with resolve and fear. It was these two qualities, perhaps, that explained how self-contradictory the man was: a scion of the elite, yet fighting against the same values that same elite fought so hard to solidify against everyone else. He paid a price for this act of rebellion and that price was his life, but upon his death he sealed his name for posterity. Life’s like that, I suppose: you remember the dead and you never forget the murdered.
Richard de Zoysa.docx by Thavam Ratna on Scribd

Review Of Draft National Trade Policy

Colombo Telegraph
By W. D. Lakshman –November 21, 2016
Prof. W. D. Lakshman
Prof. W. D. Lakshman
Sri Lanka Association for Political Economy (SLAPE) being a body of professional Economists engaged in discussing, formulating and appraising national economic development policies and strategies, felt it opportune to examine the Draft National Trade Policy, as the subject is very current, and relevant to the ongoing discussion on the proposed bilateral and regional preferential trade agreements. A panel discussion was thereby held on October 19th at the University of Colombo with Dr Ravi Ratnayake, Advisor to the Ministry of International Trade, and one of the architects of the subject policy draft, Mr Samantha Kumarasinghe, Chairman of Nature’s Secrets Company Ltd, Mr Anushka Wijesinha, the Chief Economist of Ceylon Chamber of Commerce and Dr Kenneth De Zilwa, Director of Econsult Investment and Advisory Services, as panelists and Professor W D Lakshman, the Vice Chancellor of SANASA Campus and the Convenor of the SLAPE chairing the session.
The SLAPE, guided by the objective of taking care of national development interests, is of the opinion that what was revealed through the panel discussion are of national importance, and therefore considers it opportune to makethe policy makers as well as the general public aware ofwhat transpired during the session. Hence, this statement.
Many important issues were flagged during the discussion. Among those, the principal concerns included: (i) the need for the draft National Trade Policy (NTP) to be guided by and/or designed within the broad framework of a solid well-thought out national development plan, (ii) the necessity of developing such a policy within a national industrial policy that has been lacking in the entire post- 1977 period, (iii) the evidence indicating that ‘free trade’ in itself has never ever led to economic development, so that the necessity to find alternative policy direction to the orthodox ‘free trade’ panacea, (iv) the failure of the draft national trade policy to recognise the complementarity of import substitution strategy to the notion of export-led growth.
Most importantly, it was revealed through the discussion that the draft National Trade Policy has not been guided by a solid national development vision. Any policy on international trade has to be developed after a thorough strategic appraisal of all potentially influential determinants and their interrelations, including national economic development, wellbeing of people, national autonomy and sovereignty, and geo-political interests of regional countries. As the draft trade policy document itself highlights, SLAPE emphasizes that the Government ought to carefully review the progress achieved through, and continuing non-trade barriers under, Indo-Lanka Free Trade Agreement (ILFTA) before embarking on signing a comprehensive agreement in the form of ETCA. The draft policy paper does not indicate that such strategic studies have been undertaken. Therefore, the SLAPE requests the Government that it should not rush through to develop a national Trade Policy for Sri Lanka but should properly appraise the ground reality and set national development goals prior to formulating national policies on any sector or activity of the economy.

Sri Lanka: Dozen of Defamatory Articles Published by a Website Tendered

news_lanka_e_newssandaruwan_senadeera

Mr. Sandaruwan Senadeera, Editor of  an outspoken media outlet, Lanka E News along with his lawyers are leaving the court in Colombo  ( file photo).

( November 23, 2016, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Hemantha Warnakusuriya President’s Counsel today tendered 14 separate incidents involving defamatory articles which appeared in Lankaenews defaming the judges from the Apex Court to the junior most Magistrate castigating their character and calling them “judge-thieves , (vini-soru)”.

Madhura Vithanage is an attorney-at-law who has been enrolled in the year 1999 who tendered the affidavits states inter-alia that he strongly believes that their lives and their rights could be secured only by an independent judiciary and further states that he has observed there had been series of articles published or appeared in the social media web site, face book named lankaenews in which the judges and the judicial institutions had been critically ridiculed, intimidated and at certain instances there had been scathing attacks commencing from magistrates to the Hon. Chief Justice.

According to the information filed, by Madhura Vithanage stated that the following judges have been attacked viciously when they gave judgments or orders which does not please the editor Sandaruwan Senadheera. Warnakulasuriya further stated that in addition to this news an attorney at law of the Supreme Court Chndrasiri Senveratne is also guilty of high contempt of judicial institutions.

Madhura Vithanage has requested the judges of the Supreme Court to consider these individual applications and then frame charges against Sandaruwan Senadheera and Chandrasiri Senevirathne.

The following judges had been defamed according to the affidavit:

(01) Chief Justice Hon. K. Sripavan & most judges of present Supreme Court
(02) Justice Eva Wanasundera
(03) Justice Buwenaka Aluvihare PC
(04) Justice Priyantha Jayawardena
(05) Justice A.M.D. Nawaz
(06) Justice Depali Wijesundera
(07) Justice Lalith Jayasooriya
(08) High Court Judge Sisira Ratnayaka
(09) Court Judge Sumudu Premachandra
(10) High Court Judge Kusala Sarojini Weerawardhena
(11) High Court Judge Damith Thotawatte
(12) High Court Judge Shiran Goonerathne
(13) High Court Judge Mohan Senenvirathne
(14) High Court Judge Anura Kumara
(15) Hon. Menaka Wijesundera
(16) At random Judges of the High Court
(17) Chief Magistrate Gihan Pilapitiya
(18) Magistrate Thilina Gamage
(19) Magistrate Ranga Wimalsena
(20) Magistrate Kavindra Nanayakkara
(21) Magistrate Kanishka Wijerathne

AFFIDAVIT

I, Owitigala Vithanage Madhura Vithanage of No. 148, Kalapaluwawa Road, Rajagiriya being a Buddhist do hereby solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm as follows;

1. I am the affirment above named,

2. I am a Graduate of the Faculty of Law, University of Colombo.

3. On the 6th day of July I999 I was enrolled and admitted as an Attorney-at-Law of the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka.

4. I was the former Deputy Mayor of Sri Jayawardenapura Kotte Municipal Council.

5. I am a law abiding citizen of this country and I firmly believe that all the citizens shall have the protection of law and to live in an environment where the State ensures the upholding of Rule of Law while respecting the democratic values and principles.

6. I strongly believe that our lives as well as our rights could be secured and protected only if an independent judiciary prevails in the country.

7. During the recent past I have observed that there had been a series of articles published /appeared in the social media web site/face book named “Lankaenews” in which the judges and the Judicial Institutions had been critically ridiculed and intimidated and at certain instances there had been scathing attacks on judges commencing from Magistrates to the Hon. Chief Justice.

8. I annex hereto a printout of the article which appeared in Lankaenews of 16th September 2014 marked “X”, and plead as part and parcel of this Affidavit. This article contains defamatory and contemptuous articles about His Lordship a Judge of the Court of Appeal Justice A H M D Nawaz. I certify that I myself obtained copies of these printouts from the internet. This article and other articles which are filed separately have attacked both the judiciary conduct as well as the private lives of the judges and caused embarrassment not only to the judges, but to the entire judiciary.

9. Through the contents of the said articles the web site / face book owner/operator has insulted, defamed, and ridiculed the judges whose names are referred to therein and there is direct and indirect intimidation on judges as well as the judiciary as a whole.

10. These articles have attacked on both the judicial conduct as well as the private lives of the judges and caused embarrassment not only to the judges but also to the entire judiciary.

11. “Lankaenews” is a web site/face book owned and maintained by one Mr. Sandaruwan Senadheera from London, United Kingdom, and his telephone number as appears in the web site / face book is 00 447 400927826 and email address is info@lankaenews.com.

12. I state that the contents in the said articles are derogatory of the judiciary and the judges and tantamount to contempt of court punishable under law.

13. The articles continuously published in the said web site /face book is a threat to the independence of the judiciary and harmful to the wellbeing of the general public.

14. I am advised that this is a fit and proper matter to be dealt with by the Supreme Court by exercising the inherent jurisdiction vested in it and impose and implement adequate punishment on the wrongdoer Sandaruwan Senadheera.

15. I know that Sandaruwan Senadheera editor of Lankaenews had his office at No. 11 1/1 Rajagiriya Road, Rajagiriya and thereafter, he shifted Lankaenews office to No. 844, Daham Mawatha, Talangama North, Malabe and his web newspaper was published from that address. Thus his last known address in Sri Lanka was No. 844, Daham Mawatha, Talangama North, Malabe.

The affirment having understood the contents
herein before mentioned affirmed and signed in
Colombo on day of November 2016.
14 affidavits are below;

‘Unlike you boys, I’ve to run two families’

‘Unlike you boys, I’ve to run two families’
Nov 23, 2016

A big haho occurred in parliament on the 21st, when Vavudeva Nanayakkara was addressing the House. Losing his temper, he once told a ruling member, “You sit down, without having an earful from me.” But, ruling members like Nalin Bandara and Ranjana Ramanayake cannot be silenced by such threats. They continued to ask the same question from him.

“For 10 years, your wife has earned a salary without doing any work? Not only you, but your wife too, was an advisor to Mahinda? For the all 10 years, no advice was given, but together with the vehicle, entertainment and mobile allowances, didn’t you get around Rs. 100,000 a month? You talk like Fidel Castro, but act like Gaddafi.”
That left Vasu perplexed, his answer was, “Yes, I received a salary as an adviser for Mahinda Rajapaksa. But, it is uncultured for you to ask about my wife. She is not relevant here. She is a well qualified woman. Those who appointed her should know how to obtain advice from her. Therefore, it is not relevant to me.” He dodged the question thus. But, a JVP MP who witnessed the incident said a good story at the parliament canteen.
The JVP MP in question went to Vietnam with Vasu for a conference. After the conference, they went shopping together too. Vasu kept saying, “Give me two from these gowns. Give me two from these towels. Give me two from these creams.” The red party MP asked him, “Comrade Vasu, why do you buy two from each of these?”
Vasu took a look around and replied, Unlike you boys, I have to run two families.”
The red party MP also said that Vasu used his salary as a presidential adviser to maintain that second family of his. That is why Vasu has told his challengers that they were asking uncultured questions. It is Vasu himself who had given an uncultured answer to their first question, as he had the second question haunting him. Vasu believes that it is uncultured to ask questions about uncultured conduct which is taking place openly. That is the political reality most in the joint opposition do not understand.
Fortune favoured Rani from the jaws of death

2016-11-24
Afterwards, instead of taking necessary steps to improve conditions for foreign employment or to stop sending workers to Gulf countries, relevant authorities have increased the promotional activities and expanded agreements with more countries encouraging Sri Lankan women to seek foreign employment. Despite the growing alarm at the Gulf countries’ treatment of their foreign workforce with blatant violations of their rights, the number of Sri Lankan women who seek housemaid jobs is hardly decreasing.   

In the case of under-aged Rizana, she was accused of killing an infant while in her care in Saudi Arabia, a charge which she denied. But Saudi prosecutors chose to practise Sharia (Islamic law) and she was unable to prove her innocence as she had inadequate legal representation and there were no translators available when she was tried at courts.   
Meanwhile, efforts by the Foreign Affairs Ministry Sri Lanka and Sri Lanka Foreign Employment Bureau (SLFEB) could save a 45-year-old Sri Lankan woman who had earlier been sentenced to death by stoning for adultery in Saudi Arabia in December 2015 after the government’s intervention pleading sympathetic consideration.   
Another incident similar to Rizana Nafeek’s was reported recently. Refocussing the spotlight on issues pertaining to Sri Lankan maids, a 29-year-old housemaid  Manikkam Rani was also on death row on charges of allegedly killing a nine-month infant in her care in Al Qurayyat, Saudi Arabia.   

After unwavering efforts made by the Sri Lankan Embassy and SLFEB, under the direction of Foreign Employment Minister Thalatha Athukorala, Rani was able to escape from the death sentence and on November 16, 2016 she returned to the country. In an exclusive interview with the , she shared her tragedy with us.
Rani, a single mother of a 10-year-old daughter from Galewela, Kolongola arrived in Saudi Arabia in 2014, hoping to earn enough money as a domestic aide to give her poor family a better life. She was ordered to look after six children aged between nine months and seven years, on top of her routine responsibilities such as cooking, washing clothes and cleaning her employer’s villa. Every day she used to wake up the earliest and started her duties.   
During the first two weeks with her employer, she was not treated well. She was not given food for days which finally led her to flee with hopes of finding a better place through Sri Lankan Embassy in Saudi Arabia. But her hopes were dashed and she was again taken to the same house where she was working by a group of police officers in a police jeep following a complaint made by her employer.   
After returning to the same place, she was severely have beaten by the employer’s wife for leaving the villa without notice. She said that she had to bear all the pain in order to give her little daughter a better future. So, she started her work even better than before.   

Unlike Rizana, being a mother of a 10-year-old, she had experience in caring for infants.   
On November 15, 2014, as usual she bottle-fed the infants, including the 9-month-old baby and later she went to the kitchen and started preparing breakfast. According to Rani, the mother of six (employer’s spouse) wakes up around 11.00 am every morning. On that particular day, she woke up early in the morning and checked on her children. Seconds after she arrived, she began shouting in panic that the 9-month-old infant was seen fallen unconscious with the soother in the mouth.   

After having admitted to a hospital, the infant was pronounced dead. It was said that the baby had chocked on the soother. The family accused Rani of smothering the baby.   
“On the same night, our madam questioned me whether I murdered the baby. I repeatedly denied the allegation. I said I knew how to look after infants. I can never even imagine murdering a child because I am too a mother. She did not trust what I said. I was kept in a locked room until the dawn of the following day and was handed over to the police, accusing me of murdering the infant,” Rani said. At the same time, a lawsuit was filed against her on charges of allegedly killing the baby. The plaintiffs had informed the courts that they demanded capital punishment for Rani after serving a ten-year jail term.Following several trials, she was sentenced to death by beheading on charges of causing the baby’s death of choking due to total negligence. It was a known fact that when foreign workers were accused of such cases in the Kingdom, access to lawyers and legal advice were almost denied. When innocent and mostly uneducated workers who were unable to communicate in Arabic were victims in such cases, as a result of this, they were normally unable to take adequate measures to prove their innocence.   
Fortunately for Rani, she had an opportunity to meet a fellow Sri Lankan woman who was working at a hospital in Saudi Arabia when she was brought there for a medical check-up, as part of judicial procedure.
 She had told the latter the whole story and requested her to inform her family. It was she who alerted the Sri Lankan authorities.    While expressing her whole-hearted gratitude to all who strived to save her life, she said she would have definitely been killed unless the SL authorities acted effectively by taking appropriate legal measures to appeal her case. In Rani’s case, after SL authorities submitted continual appeals, the capital punishment given to her was commuted by the Saudi Arabian government to a two-year imprisonment.   

While serving the sentence in prison, she underwent a horrible physical and mental trauma. “I was beaten almost every day by the cops. I could not speak in their language neither could understand what they were saying. The police officers often insulted me and beaten me for not being able to answer their questions in Arabic. Not only that, some police officers, including female officers spat at me every time they went past me,” she sobbed.   
She said she had heard days before leaving Saudi Arabia that her employer had lost both his legs in a crash.   
Rani took wings to Saudi Arabia via a SLFEB-registered agency, had to spend bitter days in jail for a crime she apparently did not commit and had to return empty handed. 
Each year, over 100,000 housemaids are recruited to be sent to the Gulf States upon approval from the Bureau. According to statistics, wage remittances by overseas labourers is a massive revenue earner for Sri Lanka, while Saudi Arabia remains the single largest employment provider.   

Quite often, foreign housemaids who work in the Gulf countries, especially in Saudi Arabia, are subjected to sexual harassment, physical torture, wage confiscation and overworking for long hours. More than 600 SL female/male migrant workers, who had left the country in search of greener pastures abroad are languishing in jails in several countries for various offences, with 496 Lankans in prison in Saudi Arabia alone! According to SLFEB statistics.   

Ten other SL migrant workers have been sentenced to death; five in Dubai, two each in Saudi Arabia and Abu Dhabi and one in Lebanon. They have been accused of murder, adultery, drug trafficking and over-staying their visas. The number of imprisoned Lankans reported from the Gulf include Saudi Arabia (496), Kuwait (48), Qatar (30), Dubai (17), Jordan (12), Lebanon (7), Bahrain (5), Abu Dhabi (3), Oman (3) and Israel (1).   
According to reports, 11 other Lankans are in prisons in Malaysia (4), South Korea (3) and in the Maldives (4).   

Nevertheless, the government seems to be smugly concentrating on the foreign earnings sent by Sri Lankan domestic aides without paying attention to proper procedures to train them prior to their departure, monitor their work, ensure job security and personal safety and mediate in issues faced by them. Therefore, SL, which is still in the ‘developing country’ category, poses a strong doubt whether it would stop sending domestic aides to the Gulf.    However, a fullstop could be put to the long-standing foreign employment crisis involved with domestic aides, if the government considers formulating a firm national policy on foreign employment. Until then, thousands of Sri Lankans, mainly women, would continue seeking employment abroad and there could be more victims. 

Women Human Rights Defenders In Sri Lanka: Challenges


Colombo Telegraph
By Anushka Kahandagama –November 22, 2016
Anushka Kahandagama
Anushka Kahandagama
The word ‘defender’ connotes agency and strength while the word ‘victim’ connotes passivity and susceptibility to harm and violations in the physical as well as mental sphere. However, there is a subtle or no difference between these two categories when it comes to the real world. The roles can change, as a victim can become a defender in any moment and a defender can become a victim. The many human rights violations perpetrated against and suffered by women during the war, which was side-tracked due to the sole focus on celebrating a masculine victory of the war under the previous regime, has to be addressed immediately. On the other hand, focus of human rights in the post war context under the new regime has masked other forms of human rights violations occurring in a day to day context against women. As women comprise of the larger part of the picture of Human Rights Defenders, the constant and additional challenges they encounter due to their gender, needs to be addressed. While both men and women are victims of patriarchal structures, this piece focuses on the challenges faced by women as human rights defenders.
In a militarized and patriarchal society, as the space of violence is possessed by men, women are left with the struggle for human rights, as advocates of non-violence and justice. Where men were killed and abducted, in place, women were left with ‘human rights’ to shield themselves in the brutal aftermath and seek justice for the loved ones they lost. In Sri Lanka, while men were killed and abducted in the context of war, their female relatives took on the role of human rights defenders. They faced and continue to face constant struggles in order to seek justice for their loved ones. The struggles of these women extend its horizons beyond boundaries of ethnicity, religion, class and other socially imposed categories upon them. Against this background, women took the frontlines as human rights defenders who fought their struggles most often in isolation and sometimes as groups, to reach the goal of justice.women-human-rights-defenders
Women Human Rights Defenders/ Photo via Facebook IMADR
When the husband, father or brother either goes missing, is abducted or killed, women have no option but to interact with the authorities which are highly masculine as well as patriarchal for recourse. In Sri Lanka, these women have to interact with military, police and with local authorities to make complaints, obtain compensation, relevant documentation, as well as their bare necessities. The lack of gender sensitivity in the institutional structures could be seen as a discouraging factor for women to stand as human rights defenders and will serve to exacerbate specific forms of violence against them.
Former STF Commandant remanded

Former STF Commandant remanded

logoNovember 23, 2016

The former Commandant of the Special Task Force (STF) retired DIG K.M.L. Sarathchandra, who was arrested by police for allegedly misusing a state vehicle, has been remanded till December 07. 

 He was arrested by the Police Special Investigations Unit (SIU) and produced at the Colombo Chief Magistrate’s Court today (23).

 Police informed the court that he was arrested in connection with an incident of misusing a vehicle belonging to the Police Special Task Force (STF) and requested that he be remanded as investigations regarding the suspect have not concluded.

 After considering the facts presented, Colombo Chief Magistrate Gihan Pilapitiya ordered that the suspect be remanded till December 07. 

DIG (retired) K.M.L. Sarathchandra served as the Commandants of the Special Task Force (STF) from March 24, 2008 to March 19, 2011. 

Ministry secretary stops Civil Aviation Authority’s Trinco trip!

Ministry secretary stops Civil Aviation Authority’s Trinco trip!

Nov 23, 2016

The ministry secretary has stopped a trip scheduled as an official programme by the Civil Aviation Authority. The event was to take place at a top hotel in Trincomalee at an estimated cost of around Rs. two million. However, it would not have been beneficial for the employees, reports say.

The ministry secretary has stopped the trip which had been planned without his knowledge, and also instructed all institutions coming under the ministry not to plan anything without first informing the ministry. It is ridiculous that the Civil Aviation Authority is acting in an irresponsible manner at a time when top officials of most state institutions are minimizing wastage of funding under the ‘Yahapaalana’ government.

Mahapola Fund misuse-Malik rejects JO allegations

2016-11-24

Development Strategies and International Trade Minister Malik Samarawickrama, yesterday, categorically rejected the allegation by the Joint Opposition (JO) that he had misused funds belonging to the Mahapola Fund. 

He said there was no truth whatsoever in the allegation and that the attempt by the Joint Opposition showed the bankruptcy of its members. 

Mr. Samarawickrama said he was only a member of the Mahapola Trust Fund. He said the Chief Justice was its head and its decision maker. 

“If any decision is made with regard to the Fund, it has to go through the Chief Justice. Nothing of the sort that the JO has alleged had been done. No funds have been misused or abused. These baseless allegations only show that the JO members are from the gutters,” he told Daily Mirror. 

Meanwhile, Dr. Wickrema Weerasooria, the chairman of National Wealth Corporation Ltd (NWCL), also rejected the allegations levelled by the Joint Opposition.

 Speaking to Daily Mirror, Dr. Weerasooria said what the JO said was a diabolical lie.

 “Mahapola funds have never been used by the said two companies, and no Mahapola fund had been misused or abused. Gihan Jayatilleke, the Chief Executive Officer of NWCL could corroborate this,” he said. 

He said the allegations were attempts by the JO to embarrass Minister Malik Samarawickrama and himself. (Lahiru Pothmulla)

How EU secretly embraced Israeli ministry in East Jerusalem


Catherine Ashton, pictured here with Benjamin Netanyahu, supported Israel’s war industry when she was the EU’s foreign policy chief. European External Action Service/Flickr

David Cronin-23 November 2016

European Union representatives secretly decided to cooperate with an Israeli ministry based in occupied East Jerusalem, it has been revealed.

The decision is at odds with the EU’s official stance that it does not recognize Israel’s colonization of the territories captured in 1967.

Dating from 2013 but not previously reported, the decision relied on a loophole in an EU paper on cooperation with Israel.

The paper received a hostile response from the Israeli government. It stated that activities undertaken in the settlements Israel is building in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, were not eligible for EU funding.

Although the paper was dry and insipid, Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, publicly condemned it by saying Israel would “not accept any external edicts on our borders.”

Often referred to as the “guidelines,” the paper was prepared in anticipation of Israel’s involvement in Horizon 2020, the EU’s latest program for scientific research. Amid the controversy, however, a salient fact was overlooked: Israel’s science and technology ministry has its headquarters in East Jerusalem.
That point was raised in a 2013 briefing document drafted for Catherine Ashton, then the EU’s foreign policy chief.

The briefing, obtained under EU freedom of information rules, effectively told Ashton not to worry about this matter as a loophole had been inserted into the guidelines to ensure that they did not cover public authorities.

The location of Israel’s science ministry in East Jerusalem “will not obstruct” cooperation with it, the document stated (see attachment).

Tainted

The science ministry is part of the Israel-Europe R&D Directorate, a body that coordinates Israel’s participation in Horizon 2020. A formal accord setting out the terms of Israel’s involement in the program was signed between the EU and Yaakov Perry, then Israel’s science minister, in 2014.
The loophole means that the entire program – for which almost €80 billion ($85 billion) has been earmarkedbetween 2014 and 2020 – is tainted.

The EU cannot seriously claim to oppose Israel’s gobbling up of East Jerusalem if it has embraced an Israeli ministry that is ensconced in East Jerusalem.

The European Commission, which oversees Horizon 2020, trotted out a typically bureaucratic excuse when asked for an explanation as to why it cooperates with Israel’s science ministry. Pointing to the aforementioned loophole in the guidelines, a Commission spokesperson said that, as a public authority, the science ministry was “exempted” from their scope.

Different from Trump?

To all intents and purposes, the EU’s stance differs little to that of Donald Trump, the newly-elected US president, and the Republican Party.

In the platform on which they fought the recent election, the Republicans undertook to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital if Trump won the presidency. By embracing Israeli institutions in East Jerusalem, the EU is essentially doing the same.

At least, the Republicans have been more transparent about their objectives.

The EU stands accused of saying one thing in public and something quite different behind closed doors.
During her five years as foreign policy chief, Ashton issued a number of statements against how Israel was tightening its grip on East Jerusalem. Her objection to the demolition of Shepherd’s Hotel in the Sheikh Jarrahneighborhood of the city, for example, was covered extensively by the Israeli press.

Her willingness to approve an accord with the science ministry – which is located near Sheikh Jarrah – indicates that her concern was insincere.

Worse, Ashton was hugely accommodating to firms which profited from Israel’s crimes against humanity.

Towards the end of 2013, she negotiated a deal with Tzipi Livni, Israel’s justice minister at the time. The deal enabled Israeli weapons producers to receive grants under the Horizon 2020 program.

As a result of that deal, the makers of drones and surveillance equipment tried out on Palestinians in both Gaza and the West Bank are currently being subsidized by the EU. Stop the Wall, a Palestinian campaign group, has documented how a major EU scheme nominally concerned with airport security may be utilizing technology that has been tested in settlements built by Israel in violation of international law.
Israel is treated as equal to the EU’s own member countries in the research program.

That Israel’s arms industry has been adept at soaking up subsidies is especially alarming given that there is a concerted push within the EU’s institutions to reserve part of a future research program for developing new weapons.

The only positive thing that can be said about that push is that it might usher in a modicum of honesty. Until now, the EU’s representatives have insisted that they only allow funding for civilian research.
That claim has become increasingly implausible as Israel’s war profiteers grab every grant they can get their bloodstained hands on.