Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Prez, PM allege well-funded destabilisation project

JVPer leader castigates govt over waste, corruption

 

article_image
By Shamindra Ferdinando-November 15, 2016, 10:24 pm

President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe yesterday alleged that a well-funded political project to destabilise the ruling coalition was underway. The coalition leaders claimed that a despicable attempt was being made to cause a major rift between the Sinhalese and Muslim communities to plunge the country into chaos.

President Sirisena and PM Wickremesinghe were addressing a meeting held at Committee Room ‘A’ of the BMICH to mark the 30th anniversary of Ravaya.

PM Wickremesinghe explained the continuing threat posed by those among Sinhala, Muslim and Tamil communities propagating extremist views. The UNP leader alleged that an influential section of the media had been backing the destabiliasation project. The Premier castigated the media for exploiting and influencing situations to undermine the government and in the case of print media to increase sales of their newspapers. The PM cited the recent reportage of the incidents at the Presidential Secretariat premises as an example of the media deceiving the public. The social media, too, had been used for the same purpose.

At the beginning of the meeting Ravaya urged leaders of the SLFP, UNP, TNA, JVP and SLMC to discuss ways and means of sustaining good governance policies. Its founding Editor Victor Ivan told the government and those who had worked for the regime that they had to go a long way before achieving the cherished political objectives. Ivan castigating the judiciary, pointed out that the establishment of Independent Commissions under the 19th Amendment and appointment of a new CJ wouldn’t change the corrupt system overnight.

PM Wickremesinghe emphasised the pivotal importance of their commitment to the yahapalana policies. Acknowledging that the coalition hadn’t been able to achieve all its objectives and was slow in achieving them, the Premier said that threats remained. Admitting that there could be differences among those who toiled for the regime change in January 2015, he urged them not to make an issue over the pace at which objectives were achieved.

Both President Maithripala Sirisena and the Prime Minister responded to JVP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who lashed out at the government over waste, corruption and its pathetic failure to deal swiftly and decisively with the previous government.

Alleging that the government had failed to meet the aspirations of those who had voted the Rajapaksas out of office, MP Dissanayake said that massive spending of public funds on politicians couldn’t be condoned under any circumstances. Turning towards President Sirisena and Premier Wickremesinghe, Dissanayake alleged that the cash-strapped government was planning to spend approximately 2,436 mn to hire luxury vehicles for 58 MPs. "How could this be compatible with yahapalana promises?" the JVPer asked. Dissanayake pointed out that the taxpayer had to pay approximately Rs. 700,000 for a month for each MP and at the end of the term, the vehicles would have to be returned to the company which owned them.

The JVP leader said that duty free vehicle permits issued to members of parliament too had been sold.

Dissanayake also attacked controversial agreement between the Agriculture Ministry and a businessman under which a building had been hired for a staggering monthly rent. Though several hundred million rupees had been paid in advance as rent for a year the Ministry had not yet moved into the building, the JVP leader said.

MP Dissanayake also severely criticised the appointment of ministers, State Ministers and Deputy Ministers contrary to the 19 Amendment to the Constitution which restricted the number of ministers and deputies to 30 and 40, respectively.

In spite of the change of government, those who had been in power remained very powerful and were still challenging the current administration, the MP said. The JVPer alleged that there had been a cloud over the judiciary, too, and cited several cases to justify his assertion that an influential section of the judiciary had been cooperating with those who had previously governed the country.

Dissanayake said that they couldn’t be defeated easily and the powerful grouping included a few hundred military personnel, police, public servants, politicians, the media as well as the underworld.

While declaring that he hadn’t sold duty free vehicle permits received by him, Premier Wickremesinghe stressed that the difficulties experienced by members, too, should be taken into consideration.

Responding to the JVPer, President Sirisena explained the circumstances under which the promise to restrict the number of ministers to 30 couldn’t be kept. "Had there been a possibility to appoint 30 ministers in the wake of Aug 2015 parliamentary polls, I would have certainly done that," President Sirisena said. "But political realities and the ground situation compelled the government to go for a larger Cabinet." The SLFP leader strongly defended his decision to accommodate defeated SLFP candidates through the National List as he needed a group of loyal members. The President alleged that former President Mahinda Rajapaksa had campaigned hard to ensure their defeat and there had arise the need to bring them in through the National List.

President Sirisena censured a section of the state-owned media for failing in their responsibility.

President Sirisena vowed that he had the strength and courage to overcome challenges and ensure continuation of yahapalana policies. Commenting on the weekly Ravaya reportage, President Sirisena said that he sometimes felt the urge to inquire from Ravaya whether the newspaper considered him as the common enemy and whether they believed nothing had happened since the January 2015 revolution.

Swarnavahini to come under Jeewaka again !

Swarnavahini to come under Jeewaka again !

Nov 15, 2016

The EAP media network of EAP Group is once again due to come under the control of Jeewaka Edirisinghe, say sources in the Group.

He is expected to take up duties as managing director of EAP media network from November 17.
 
Also, EAP Group’s Swarnamahal will come under Deepa Edirisinghe and EAP Cinema and film halls under Asanka Edirisinghe.
 
Nalaka Edirisinghe will be the new managing director of all financial companies of EAP Group.
 
Mano Tittawella, who is the chairman presently, is due to leave EAP Group on March 31 next year, and his place is to be taken by the senior in the Edirisinghe family, Jeewaka, the sources say further.
 
Today (15), several websites reported that businessman Arjun Aloysius was going to buy Swarnavahini.
 
When contacted, the EAP management said there was no truth to those reports, but confirmed the abovementioned administrative changes.

untitled-3

untitled-2logoWednesday, 16 November 2016

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe at the 15th Asia Pacific Conference in Hong Kong early November informed that Sri Lanka will give 50 sq.km to China Merchant Group for industrialisation. Newspapers reported that the cabinet accepted the swapping of the Hambantota Port debt to equity and the Government will sign the agreement on 8 January, next year. Under the proposal, China Merchant Port Holdings Ltd. (a member of the group) is to acquire 80% of Hambantota equity, valued at $ 1.08 billion and to settle payments in instalments. In addition, the Government hopes to dispose Mattala Airport under a PPA.

Police Arrests ‘Saviour Of The Sinhalese’ Who Threatened To Bomb Muslims


Colombo Telegraph
November 15, 2016
The Fort Police today arrested a man by the name of ‘Dan Priyasad’ who calls himself the ‘Saviour of the Sinhalese’ and has been threatening to bomb Muslims in Sri Lanka.
A spokesman at the police media unit confirmed to the Colombo Telegraph that the man has been arrested following a complaint that he has been threatening the Muslims. However, the media unit had still not received complete information pertaining to the arrest, and the formal charges.
However, the Colombo Telegraph learns that several Parliamentarians had made telephone calls to the Inspector General of Police Pujith Jayasundara, who had subsequently ordered the police to take action against Priyasad, even though complaints were made against Priyasad initially, but no action was taken against him.
During a recent protest opposite the Fort Railway Station, a group of protestors, including Priyasad declared that they were ready to even carry out suicide bombings to eliminate Muslims.
Meanwhile, in a post published today evening, the saviour of the Sinhalese has said that his life is in danger, and the ‘solution’ is in the hands of the Sinhalese Buddhists.
Following his arrest, supporters of Priyasad has called on the people to gather around the Fort Police station to demonstrate against the arrest.

Cornel Perera gives his side of the story regarding Hilton Hotel dispute

Cornel Perera gives his side of the story regarding Hilton Hotel dispute

Businessman Cornel Perera has written to the minister of finance giving his side of the story regarding the Hilton Hotel dispute.

In the letter, copied to the president, prime minister and several ministers, Perea says he will “…sincerely, devotedly and with commitment, assist and facilitate the Cabinet to expeditiously settle and conclude the Hilton saga with a win for all and malice to none…”
We are in possession of the said letter, dated 30 June 2016, and tagged strictly confidential.
cornel 1cornel 41

Battle of Aleppo: Syria government hits east for first time in month


Russia had halted air strikes on besieged east Aleppo on 18 October ahead of a short-lived truce
Rebel fighters from the Jaish al-Fatah (or Army of Conquest) brigades watch as smoke billows in the background at an entrance to Aleppo (AFP)

Tuesday 15 November 2016
Syrian government air strikes and barrel bomb attacks hit residential neighbourhoods of rebel-held east Aleppo on Tuesday for the first time in nearly a month, a monitor said.
"Regime aircraft launched strikes and dropped barrel bombs on a number of neighbourhoods in the east of Aleppo for the first time since October 18," said Rami Abdel Rahman, director of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor.
An AFP photographer in the eastern side of the city said the Sakhur and Masakan Hanano neighbourhoods had been hit.
The raids came as Moscow said jets taking off from the Russian Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier in the eastern Mediterranean had launched their first strikes in Syria, in Idlib and Homs provinces.
Footage posted by the Russian Ministry of Defence showed fighter jets taking off from the flight deck of the Admiral Kuznetsov.
The bombardment of east Aleppo ended a period of relative quiet for more than 250,000 people living in the besieged rebel-held side of the city.
Moscow announced on 18 October it was halting its air strikes in Aleppo ahead of a short-lived truce, and Syrian strikes on the east of the city have also subsided since then, with bombardment mostly confined to areas where clashes were taking place on the edge of the city.
The respite came after international criticism of a ferocious assault launched by Syrian and Russian forces on 22 September in a bid to recapture east Aleppo.
The bombing campaign killed hundreds of people, including civilians, and destroyed infrastructure.
Moscow has organised several brief truces intended to encourage residents and surrendering rebels to leave east Aleppo, but few have done so.
No aid has entered the east of the city since it was first surrounded by government troops in mid-July, and the UN warned on Thursday that it was distributing its last remaining food rations in the rebel districts.
On Sunday, residents in the east received text messages from the army warning rebels to leave within 24 hours.
"Those who want to save their lives must put down their weapons and their safety will be guaranteed. After the end of this period, the planned strategic offensive will begin," the message said.
Once Syria's economic powerhouse, Aleppo has been ravaged by the war that started in March 2011 with anti-government protests.
It has been divided between government control in the west and rebel control in the east since mid-2012.

Egyptian court overturns ex-president Mursi's death sentence

Egypt's deposed president Mohamed Mursi greets his lawyers and people from behind bars at a court wearing the red uniform of a prisoner sentenced to death, during his court appearance with Muslim Brotherhood members on the outskirts of Cairo, Egypt, June 21, 2015. REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh/File Photo
Egypt's deposed president Mohamed Mursi greets his lawyers and people from behind bars at a court wearing the red uniform of a prisoner sentenced to death, during his court appearance with Muslim Brotherhood members on the outskirts of Cairo, Egypt, June 21, 2015. REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh/File Photo

Tue Nov 15, 2016

Egypt's Court of Cassation on Tuesday overturned a death sentence against deposed president Mohammed Mursi of the Muslim Brotherhood and ordered a retrial.

Mursi was sentenced to death in June 2015 in connection with a mass jail break during Egypt's 2011 uprising.

Mursi, democratically elected after the revolution, was overthrown in mid-2013 by then-general Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, now the president, following mass protests against his rule, and immediately arrested.
Tuesday's court ruling means that Mursi is no longer under threat of execution, although he is serving three lengthy jail sentences.

Since toppling Mursi, Sisi has clamped down on dissent. Mass trials have been held for thousands of Muslim Brotherhood supporters, and hundreds have received death sentences or lengthy prison terms.

Abdel-Moneim Abdel-Maksoud, the Brotherhood's lawyer, said the Court of Cassation had applied the law correctly.

"The ruling was expected because (Mursi's conviction) was legally flawed, and we are waiting for the retrial."

Mursi is already serving a 20-year prison sentence for a conviction arising from the killings of protesters during demonstrations in 2012. He has also been sentenced to 40 years on charges of spying for Qatar and to life imprisonment on charges of spying for the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas.
The government deems the Brotherhood, Egypt's oldest opposition movement dating back decades, a terrorist group. The Brotherhood says it is committed to peaceful activism.
Activists and rights groups at home and abroad have said many or all the mass trials have been legally flawed. The Egyptian government says the judiciary is independent and that it never intervenes in its work.

(Reporting by Haitham Ahmed and Amina Ismail; Writing by Asma Alsharif; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

I’m Arab and Many of Us Are Glad That Trump Won



Omar KamelOmar Kamel-Nov 9


It’s not that we see Trump any differently. Trump is an egotistical racist misogynist who, in a rational world, shouldn’t be in any position of power. Then again, neither should Hillary Clinton.

We watched from afar (as ‘afar’ as the internet allows anyhow) as the 2016 presidential campaign rolled on, and, at first, we wanted Bernie Sanders to win, and were very glad to see just how much support he managed to get, but then, Bernie did two Very Bad Things; he said he was okay with Obama’s Blacklist and his usage of drone strikes, and he said that he’d support Clinton if he didn’t get the nomination. Some people held on to Bernie, but for many of us, for me, that was it. Bernie might still have claimed to be ‘better’, but he certainly couldn’t claim to be ‘good’.

We also watched the political establishment ignore Bernie and shove Clinton ahead of the self described ‘socialist’. We watched as even people like John Oliver and the entire cast of Saturday Night Live attacked Trump viciously and tried to pave the way to a Clinton victory. Oliver even took it upon himself to attack and ridicule minor candidates like Stein & Johnson, but not Clinton. We watched as so-called liberals and so-called democrats made Clinton out to be a hero. We watched as all those people bent over backwards and pretended that Clinton was one of the good guys because they felt compelled to pick between the ‘lesser of two evils’.

It was pathetic.

There’s a bit of fatalism involved here, to be sure, and a deep level of cynicism. Many of us feel that if America could not choose the best option, then it deserved the worst. Also, there’s a harsh desire for rough truth, rather than hypocritical garnish. In a sense, many Americans are Trump, but most of them like to think of themselves as closer in character to who Clinton (falsely) claims to be; liberal, democratic, leftist, humane, charitable, kind. There are some who faced the facts honestly, and admitted that, for all intents and purposes, Clinton was a criminal and a manipulator who plays ball with the worst human rights offenders on the planet (Saudi Arabia and Israel, for example) and relies on their financial and political support. They understood that when promising to continue Obama’s legacy, Clinton is in fact promising to kill another 4,000 innocent Pakistanis by drone strikes in an illegal attempt to murder untried ‘terrorists’. They understand that this is a woman for whom Madeline Albright is a role model, and Kissinger is an icon, a woman who started out Republican before swapping sides and acting as though she were a Democrat, most likely because she realized that, as a woman, she could go farther as a Democrat. This is a liar who claims to have been dodging sniper fire in a foreign land when she was being greeted with flowers.

Throughout the campaign, Clinton supporters have turned a blind eye to her failings. Somehow they were more horrified by what Trump may do than what Clinton already has done.

So yeah, we weren’t very excited about a Clinton victory. Nothing would change. America would continue to think itself a progressive democracy that voted in first a black man, and then a woman. The demon would continue to wear a passable face, remain…presentable.

We do not think Trump is any better, but we think a Trump victory would force the USA to admit to what it has become, and would allow other countries around the world to react appropriately now that the cover has been blown.

JFK put on a good mask but behind the mask he was a lying adulterer who lifted the weapons embargo on Israel, allowing the US to supply it with the weapons used against Palestinians. The so-called ‘Special Relationship’ between the USA and Israel began with JFK. His smile and charm, however, make people, even in the Arab world, look back on him with fondness. Bill Clinton was the same, all charm and smiles while he signed off on the use of military force against Americans on American soil (in Waco), and pushed the Palestinians through Oslo, and then later, in his impeachment hearings, pretended the word ‘is’ was ambiguous. The Bill Clinton I remember was an arrogant liar and a murderer, not a charming man at all. The latest in this series of supposed good guys is Obama, proudly black, but closer to what Malcolm X referred to as a ‘house nigger’. Obama did not stop the war machine, and did not close down Guantanamo. Drone usage during Obama’s time has gone up exponentially, but…he performs beautifully; he cries when school shootings take place, he laughs at himself with an anger translating sketch, he dances and raps to your pleasure, he seems cool and laid back, a great dad, a fun guy.

To tens of thousands of Pakistanis though, Obama is nothing but a cold blooded murderer. To Egyptians he is just another in a long line of US presidents who support a military dictatorship, supplying it with money and weapons. To people in Yemen (the poorest Arab country), he is the man who has helped supply Saudi Arabia (ostensibly the most fascist country on Earth) with more than $100 billion in weapons with which they have destroyed Yemen. To millions of people around the world he is a bomb that happens to have a smile painted on it.

And now, finally, rather than suffer the pretense of progress under a female president, America has voted for Trump.

Good.

Lay bare the racism, lay bare the arrogance, lay bare the lies and the brutalities.

Face yourselves, see yourselves, and then maybe, maybe, things will change…

‘Forget human rights’, Duterte tells Islamic State militants wanting to enter Philippines

Image via Concept News Central.
Image via Concept News Central.

 

PHILIPPINES President Rodrigo Duterte told Islamic State militants that he would not consider their human rights amid concerns that the extremist group would attempt to gain footing in his country after being driven out of Syria and Iraq.

Pointing out the situation in the southern Mindanao province, which is a hotbed for militancy and bandit groups, Duterte warned of “looming terrorism” and the rise in extremist influence in the region which threatens national security, Reuters reported.

“Once the terrorists of the Middle East are deprived of the land area, the real estate area where they can sleep … they will wander to other places and they will come here and we have to prepare for that,” he was quoted as saying during a speech at a law enforcement agency.

“Remember, these guys, they do not have an iota of what is human rights, believe me. I will not just simply allow my people to be slaughtered for the sake of human rights, that’s bullshit.”

Duterte has often been criticised by governments, international organisations and rights groups for alleged human rights abuses and extrajudicial killings of drug suspects in his bloody war on drugs.

The former Davao city mayor said the kidnap-for-ransom activities of the Abu Sayyaf terror group which have continued unabated for many years show there is a “very strong” Islamist rebellion in the region.


According to Reuters, the Abu Sayyaf group, which has pledged allegiance to the Islamic State, are currently holding 21 hostages, mostly foreigners. The militants have continued to seize captives despite the major offensive launched by the Philippine military to wipe them out.

Operating in the Jolo and Basilan Islands southwest of the Philippines, members of the Abu Sayyaf group are notoriously known for seizing foreigners to demand millions of pesos to secure their release. Botched attempts to gain ransom often lead to the beheading of the captives.

Last week, Duterte agreed to allow the Malaysian and Indonesian maritime security forces to enter Philippine waters to chase groups that abduct hostages in the bordering region.

In a move to address the southern unrest and the war on drugs, Duterte on Friday threatened to use his executive power by suspending habeas corpus, allowing authorities to conduct arrests and detention without the need for a warrant.

With the suspension, authorities can detain suspects for up to 60 days “in case of invasion or rebellion, when the public safety requires it”, as provided in the Constitution. It would also allow authorities to arrest and detain a suspect for three days without filing a charge.

On Monday, Duterte’s office released a statement saying the president had issued a stern warning that he would take more drastic action towards perpetrators of violent acts.

We need to talk about the online radicalisation of young, white men

With the appointment of Breitbart News’s chair to Trump’s staff we need to be clear about the links between misogyny, racism and neofascism on alt-right websites

Become a Guardian supporter or make a contribution

 Donald Trump’s head of strategy, Steve Bannon, backstage during a campaign event in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, on 1 November. Photograph: Carlo Allegri/Reuters

Tuesday 15 November 2016 

For several years now, I’ve had a dark and fairly unusual hobby. When I’m alone and bored and the mood strikes me, I’ll open up my laptop and head for a particularly unsavoury corner of the internet.
No, not the bit you’re thinking of. Somewhere far worse. That loose network of blogs, forums, subreddits and alternative media publications colloquially known as the “manosphere”. An online subculture centred around hatred, anger and resentment of feminism specifically, and women more broadly. It’s grimly fascinating and now troubling relevant.

In modern parlance, this is part of the phenomenon known as the “alt-right”. More sympathetic commentators portray it as “a backlash to PC culture” and critics call it out as neofascism. Over the past year, it has been strange to see the disturbing internet subculture I’ve followed for so long enter the mainstream. The executive chairman of one of its most popular media outlets, Breitbart, has just been appointed Donald Trump’s chief of strategy, and their UK bureau chief was among the first Brits to have a meeting with the president-elect. Their figurehead – Milo Yiannopoulos – toured the country stumping for him during the campaign on his “Dangerous Faggot” tour. These people are now part of the political landscape.

On their forums I’ve read long, furious manifestos claiming that women are all sluts who “ride the cock carousel” and sleep with a series of “alpha males” until they reach the end of their sexual prime, at which point they seek out a “beta cuck” to settle down with for financial security. I’ve lurked silently on blogs dedicated to “pick-up artistry” as men argue that uppity, opinionated, feminist women – women like myself – need to be put in their place through “corrective rape”.

I know about the “men going their own way” movement, which is based around the idea that men should avoid any sort of romantic or sexual relationship with women. I’m aware of “traditional marriage” advocates, who often argue that you should aim to marry a very young woman as she’s likely to be easier to control. I also learned the difference between an “incel” who is involuntarily celibate, and a “volcel” who makes a deliberate choice to avoid sexual activity, and sometimes also masturbation, often in the belief that ejaculation depletes their testosterone and saps them of masculine power.

It’s hard to know whether pseudonymous online posters are telling the truth about their offline identity: the individuals making up the manosphere seem to skew younger on average, but be drawn from all walks of life. There are socially awkward, video game-loving teenagers, bitter divorcees and Ivy League-educated millennials who feel women don’t afford them the respect and admiration they deserve. There are men who claim to be highly successful at attracting sexual partners, but hate women all the same.

One thing I noticed early on is that the community seems to be largely white. And that’s evident because race comes up, a lot. Sometimes, in the form of a kind of racial psuedo-science that advocates use to explain the dynamics of heterosexual relations. The age-old racist argument – that black men are “taking our women” – is made regularly. Racist slurs are chucked around casually. There seems to be a significant overlap with organised white supremacy.

Even taking into account its rising prominence, it would be absurd to claim that the alt-right is primarily responsible for electing Donald Trump. More than 60 million people voted for him, the majority of whom have probably had little or no contact with this strange, angry online movement. Most were people who also voted Republican in previous elections.

A minority were previous Obama voters, mainly concentrated in lower income brackets. Just over half of white women went for the guy who was facing rape charges, and who was caught on camera asserting that he would “grab them by the pussy” if he felt like it. Turnout was also depressed, through voter suppression and also because some Democrat voters felt uninspired by Hillary Clinton’s candidacy.
What is true, though, is that some of his most passionate, core supporters seem to be regulars on the blogs and forums I’m talking about. It’s no surprise that pretty much every prominent manosphere figure came out in support of Trump, and Clinton’s gender isn’t the only relevant factor.

Prior to the election, members of the alt-right online community often warned each other to keep their Trump support secret to avoid being “stigmatised” by more liberal peers. Now they’re celebrating openly. They’re gleeful about some of the harshest policies Trump promised: mass deportations, defunding Planned Parenthood, the wall. They feel like they have scored a victory against feminism and multiculturalism. They’re glad that white men are, once again, in control. They were filled with fury at the thought they had been toppled from their rightful place at the top of the social hierarchy; this is vindication. The old order has been defeated, this is their world now.

When we fret about young people leaving western countries and going to fight with Isis, it’s common to focus on the role of the internet in their political radicalisation. It’s time we discussed the radicalisation of angry, young white men in a similar way. The manosphere gave us Elliot Rodger. He was a regular on the forum “PUAhate” – populated by bitter men who had tried the techniques advocated by so-called “pick-up artists” to attract women and failed.

Reading through the posting history of individual aliases, it’s possible to chart their progress from vague dissatisfaction, and desire for social status and sexual success, to full-blown adherence to a cohesive ideology of white supremacy and misogyny. Neofascists treat these websites as recruitment grounds. 
They find angry, frustrated young men and groom them in their own image. Yet there’s no Prevent equivalent to try to stamp this out.

Much has been written about financial hardship turning afflicted white communities into breeding grounds for white supremacist politics, but what about when dissatisfaction has little to do with economic circumstance? It’s hard to know what can be done to combat this phenomenon, but surely we have to start by taking the link between online hatred and resentment of women and the rise of neofascism seriously.

 This article was amended on 15 November 2016. An earlier version said that two-thirds of white women voted for Donald Trump. The figure was 53% according to exit polls.

Why Was Russia’s Economic Minister Just Put on Trial?

Why Was Russia’s Economic Minister Just Put on Trial?

BY ROBBIE GRAMER-NOVEMBER 15, 2016

If Russia is cracking down on corruption, apparently no one warnedAlexei Ulyukayev. On Tuesday, Moscow’s anti-corruption Investigative Committee charged Ulyukayev, the government’s economy minister, with attempting to take bribes to approve a major oil company acquisition deal. But as with many high-profile arrests in Russia, there’s a lot more to the story beneath the state-run media headlines.
The Investigative Committee charged Ulyukayev with corruption after he “threatened” to create obstacles for one state-owned oil company, Rosneft, to acquire a 50 percent stake in another, Bashneft, unless he was paid a $2 million bribe. The Rosneft-Bashneft deal sparked a turf war between rivaling factions in Russia before Ulyukayev’s arrest, one source told Reuters.

Ulyukayev and economic liberals close to Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev initially opposed the acquisition. Meanwhile, Igor Sechin, CEO of Rosneft and close Putin ally, fiercely lobbied for it. In October, Sechin’s faction wonthe power struggle. The government hoped the $5 billion deal could help tackle Moscow’s burgeoning budget deficit amid a recession fueled by the global oil price glut and Western sanctions.

Some Kremlin watchers are already questioning Ulyukayev’s guilt. Putin has a habit of consolidating power through high-profile arrests and prosecutions, as Mikhail Khodorkovsky (who, for the record, does not believe that Ulyukayev would solicit a bribe from Sechin) and Alexei Navalny know all too well. Ulyukayev could well be the latest in a long line of Russian power brokers to fall victim to Putin’s predilection for making a point through arrest.

“Putin’s logic in arresting the loyal and high-ranking Ulyukayev was to demonstrate his power over all government officials. The overnight arrest of a minister lets everyone know that anything can happen at any time,” Grigory Yavlinsky, leader of liberal opposition party Yabloko, told Russian radio station Ekho Moskvy.

“You would have to be crazy to threaten Rosneft and extract a $2 million bribe from Igor Sechin, one of the most influential people in this country, a month after the deal was given legal and political clearance,” Alexander Shokhin, head of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs said, told Business FM Radio.

It is unclear if the arrest is meant to pave the way for the next stage of theprivatization of Rosneft, or if it is a behind-the-scenes admission that the Russian economy is hurting and not likely to soon get better, or it’s a power play for the position of prime minister, or even if it’s simply to keep government ministers on their proverbial toes.

What is clear is that the trial is taking place on Tuesday. Prosecutors haveapparently asked for the economy minister to be kept under house arrest during the trial. Ulyukayev could face up to 15 years in prison if found guilty. He is the highest-ranking official the state has detained since the dissolution of the Soviet Union — and, per Moscow-based journalist Joshua Yaffa, the first serving minister to be arrested since Lavrentiy Beria in 1953.

Photo credit: VASILY MAXIMOV/AFP/Getty Images

Global Day of Action against trade union repression

HomeGlobal Day of Action against trade union repression
The 16th of November is a Global Day of Action to stop the repression against unionists and labour activists.
This date was chosen by a number of labour organisations in the Asia Pacific region as it is the anniversary of the Hacienda Luisita massacre in The Philippines that occurred in 2004.
The Global Day of Action gives us an opportunity to stand together internationally for our rights as a class. The event for for Melbourne, Australia is at the 8 Hour Monument at 5:30pm.
Our demands are:
·         Stop the killings of workers and unionists
·         Free our comrades in jail
·         Organising is not a crime
·         Stop sexual violence against women workers
·         Support unions as they save workers' lives
·         Un-organised workers are used as cheap labour, a living wage for all
This year we especially remember these comrades, struggles and issues:
1) Han Sang Gyun – President Korean Confederation of Trade Unions
In July of this year, Han Sang-gyun was jailed for five years for his part in organising working class demonstrations. This is not the first time he has been jailed for trade union activities. Han has a long and proud history as a labour activist.
2) Somyot Pruksakasemsuk – Thai journalist and labour activist
Somyot was imprisoned in 2011 and later sentenced to 10 years in jail under that country’s repressive Lese Majeste law. Somyot has just been awarded a prestigious labour award. The current Thai military dictatorship has clamped down even further, with more workers detained under Lese Majeste.
3) Sexual violence against women
Women workers not only need to fight for wages and conditions, but face the additional pressure of sexual exploitation and violence. Whether it is in IndonesiaIndiaHong Kong or the Gulf States of West Asia, this gender based violence serves to oppress and discourage women workers from organising.
4) Meng Han – Chinese labour right activist
The last few years has seen a massive increase of labour actions and strikes by workers in China. Labour activists like Meng Han, with another three colleagues, were arrested for the crime of advising workers of their rights. Many Chinese workers want independent labour organisations to fight for better wages and conditions
5) The Pricol 8 – A massive legal injustice
In 2015, in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, 8 labour activists at the automobile parts company of Pricol were given double life prison sentences. They have been framed for an alleged murder of a manager to serve as a stark warning to all other workers. In northern India, the Maruti Suzuki workers have also felt the same repression.
6) Un-organised workplaces injure and kill people
The less organised workers are, the more dangerous the workplace is going to be. We remember and pay tribute to our fellow workers at the Pakistani and Bangladeshi shipbreaking yards, those at Dangyang and Xinmin in China or at a coal mine in Pakistan where explosions occurred, in Tongi, Bangladeshwhere fire destroyed the factory, migrant workers in Qatar and China, in Perth, Australia and Mayong in China due to unsafe construction sites, and at Samsung in South Korea.
7) Esmail Abdi – General Secretary of the Iranian Teachers’ Trade Association
The Iranian government runs a brutal anti worker administration that effectively makes any independent union activity illegal. Esmail Abdi was recently given 6 years jail for organising a strike. Unfortunately Esmail is only one of many workers who are in Iranian jails. Punishment can sometimes include public flogging.
8) Tactics used to undermine workers unity
Sometimes workers manage to organise amid great difficulties. In vicious attempts to destroy this unity of workers, the whole workforce is sacked or the actual workplace is closed down or workers are casualised. We stand united with the Faremo workers in the Phililippines, the Australian CUB workers, and the PepsiCo workers in India