Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, November 14, 2016

Navy earns Rs. 2.3 bn from Avant Garde operations

2016-11-14

Having taken over the Onboard Security Team Operations (OBST) from Avant Garde Maritime Services, the Navy said today said that it had earned an income of Rs. 2.33 billion since November 13 last year. 

Navy Spokesman Akram Alavi said the Navy had carried out a total of 6,150 shipments to the Galle harbour and 496 shipments to the Colombo harbour, with an average of approximately 554 shipments month.   

The earnings generated through OBST operations are directly deposited in the Consolidated Fund of the Sri Lanka Government. 

 With the annulment of the previous agreement, Sri Lanka Navy was entrusted the task of providing security to merchant vessels and supplying services to Security Firms involved in providing onboard security for merchant ships. 

The Government in early November decided to handover the operations of the controversial AGMSL to the Navy.(Darshana Sanjeewa)

Ratwatte and Pakaralingam get a shelling from the Health Minister

Ratwatte and Pakaralingam get a shelling from the Health Minister

Nov 14, 2016

If you ask any UNP Minister to describe Charitha Rathwatte they would say he is the man who destroyed the UNP in 2004 and has come back to destroy the UNP again. Even when the Prime Minister proposed the name of Ratwatte for CB Governor all the key decision makers did not want Rathwatte anywhere near the Central Bank.

The President and Former President were adamant that Rathwatte should not be appointed to the post of Governor, given his poor track record. The Prime Minister who was struggling to get cover after the COPE Report on the Bond Scam was released, given that the Joint Opposition and certain SLFP ministers were ganging up together to ask for the Prime Minister’s Resignation, it was the Health Minister who came to his rescue given the precarious situation the Prime Minister was placed.
According to a Cabinet minister the tone of the cabinet meeting had changed after the intervention of the Health Minister at the Cabinet Meeting held two weeks ago and the SLFP tune that was on the offensive also changed by evening. The Health Minister we understand had supported the Prime Minister despite the Prime Minister’s office mafia led by Ratwatte having given the nod for the Health Minister to be questioned by the Bribery Commission ahead of people like Gamini Senarath and Nivard Cabral.
After the fiery Cabinet meeting the Health Minister had vented his frustration by blasting the 80-year-old Paskaralingem. We understand he had told him” you entertain unsolicited proposals from certain people and approve them in 24 hours, while the health ministry proposals are sent from pillar to post with no finality.
I am not going to tolerate this anymore. Then he had said “tell that Ratwatte he ruined the government last time and we will not allow him to do it again. I will bring it up in cabinet”. Where was he before the election?  He spent 10 years saying the UNP can never make it under Ranil Wickramasinghe, now he has joined our government. Ratwatte got his younger brother appointed as Sri Lankan CEO and against the board wishes forcibly got him confirmed as CEO has ruined the airline according to the pilots guild. The Airline's indecisiveness under his leadership  has cost the airline millions of dollars and the latest decision to shut down flights into Paris, Rome and Germany is very very foolish according to travel experts.
We understand the President is very unhappy with the duo and many UNP Ministers are complaining that the UNP is continuing from where they were unceremoniously thrown out in 2004 thanks to people like Ratwatte and Paskaralingem being given positions in the government and wonder why an intelligent man like the Prime Minister cannot see the writing on the wall.

UN envoy warns West Bank camp could 'explode'

Balata camp is seen as a base for Mahmoud Abbas' main rival Mohammed Dahlan, who is currently exiled in the UAE

Palestinians walk in and out of a UN-run school in the West Bank Balata refugee camp on the first day of the new school year (AFP)

Monday 14 November 2016
The UN's top official on the Israeli-Palestinian peace process said Monday he was concerned the West Bank's largest refugee camp could "explode" if intra-Palestinian clashes worsen, during a rare visit to the Balata camp.
In what his officials said was the first visit in "years" by a top UN official to the camp near Nablus in the northern West Bank, Middle East peace envoy Nikolay Mladenov met with civil society figures and politicians including those believed to be opposed to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
Balata has seen an uptick of violence in recent weeks, with Palestinian security officials attempting a series of raids to capture alleged criminals in the camp - leading to gunbattles.
Analysts say Abbas sees the camp as a base for support for his political rival Mohammed Dahlan, who is currently in exile in the United Arab Emirates.
Mladenov said he had visited the camp to send a message that the "international community is watching" the situation on the ground.
"If you forget about these communities, they will explode," he said in an interview with AFP.
Balata, where 30,000 people live in 25 hectares, is the largest Palestinian refugee camp in the West Bank and played a key role in previous Palestinian intifadas, or uprisings, against Israel.
The lives of residents have worsened as the camps have been left behind economically compared with major Palestinian cities, said Mukhaimer Abusada, professor of politics at Azhar University.
"Dahlan, who is the main competitor against Abu Mazen, has exploited the situation in the camps by offering some assistance to those in the camps," said Abusada.
Dahlan, Fatah's former strongman in Gaza, was expelled from the party in 2011 but is now believed to have strong support in a number of key Arab states in the battle to replace Abbas, who is 81 and has been in power 11 years.
Mladenov met with local civil society leaders and teachers and also the camp's Popular Committee - a political leadership body - in a meeting closed to the media.
Abusada said a number of the committee’s members were believed to be allied to Dahlan.
Mladenov stressed the UN was not interfering in Palestinian politics but was trying to stop political differences crossing "over into an environment that becomes violent in which Palestinians stand against other Palestinians with weapons".
"Our role is to be able to talk to everyone and to send everyone a very clear message that violence is not the answer."
He added the UN remains supportive of Abbas's efforts to bring a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
"Abu Mazen is the person most committed to non-violence and a peaceful resolution. If he is undermined that will affect the Palestinian cause," he said, using the Arabic nickname for Abbas.
In the run-down camp residents were wary of talking politics but one who did not want to be named said the Abbas-run Palestinian Authority was deeply unpopular.

Jewish settlement legalisation

The warning comes as Palestinian leaders attacked Israeli plans to legalise Jewish settlements built on private Palestinian land, according to agency reports, and said they intend to take the issue up with the United Nations.
"The recent Israeli measures are going to lead to catastrophe in the region," said Nabil Abu Rudeina, spokesman for Abbas
"The Palestinian leadership will turn to the UN Security Council and all other international organisations to stop those Israeli measures."
Palestinian foreign minister Riad al-Malki added that the Israeli government was seeking to "impose facts on the ground and create new realities by legalising the illegal actions that it commits."
Israel's ministerial committee for legislation approved a draft bill on Sunday, aimed at legalising wildcat Jewish settlements built on private Palestinian land, parliamentary sources said.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also backed a bill limiting the volume of calls to prayer from mosques, a proposal government watchdogs have called a threat to religious freedom.That bill was also denounced bt the Palestinian authority.
The settlement bill must pass through three readings in parliament and also be ratified by the supreme court before it can become law.
The vote was rushed through the ministerial committee in an attempt to prevent the evacuation of the Jewish settlement of Amona in the Israeli-occupied West Bank by the end of the year.
But Israel's high court rejected on Monday the government bid to delay the evacuation the Amona settlement in the occupied West Bank beyond a 25 December deadline.
Amona is home to about 40 families - who right-wing politicians have called on to remain - and was built on land privately owned by Palestinians, who have petitioned the court for the outpost to be removed.
"The evacuation must occur before December 25," the court said in its ruling. "The court rejects the delay requested by the state."
In what seemed to be a sharp criticism of the government, it further said that "the duty to obey rulings is not a matter of choice.
"It is an essential component of the rule of law to which all are bound as part of the values of the state of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state."
The international community considers all Israeli settlements in Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank to be illegal, whether they are authorised by the government or not.
They are also seen as a major stumbling block to peace efforts as they are built on land the Palestinians see as part of their future state.

Candidate polling 574,065 votes more is loser still under queer American elections system !


Trump’s opponents protest (video )

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -13.Nov.2016, 11.30PM)   One of the fundamental requirements  of Democracy is conceding victory to the candidate who won on the votes of the majority of the people .In America this Democratic requirement is not followed . Although Hilary Clinton won with a larger number of votes , she  has been declared the loser and Donald Trump who polled less votes has won. This is because of the election system in the U.S. 
The number of votes polled by Hilary Clinton is : 60,839, 922  (47.78 % of the votes) as against  Trump  who  polled only 60, 265,858 votes (47.33 %) .Accordingly ,Hilary has polled 574,064 votes more than Trump.
Simultaneously with the presidential election , members  are appointed  to the Senate and  the lower assembly . The candidate who is the leader of the team with the representation  exceeding 270 members is declared   the winner .Trump won with 290 representatives which is in excess of 270. In other words  , the wishes of the majority  of people  is rejected.
Tens of Thousand of people took to the streets today to protest  that Trump is not their president. The main slogan of theirs was ‘Racist sexist anti Gay Trump go away.’
The Sri Lankans  who  are loquacious  about the new election system here should  study this queer  system profoundly  with a view to  minimize the errors in our own  proposed election system.
A live video footage of those opposing Trump can be viewed hereunder 
Meeting the press for first time since Trump’s win, Obama says new president-elect is committed to NATO

President Obama reiterated that U.S. support for NATO “will continue” during a news conference Monday, Nov. 11. (The Washington Post)


 November 14

President Obama held his first news conference since voters sharply rejected his candidate and his party at the polls last week, reassuring people at home and abroad that Donald Trump was committed to governing in a more pragmatic fashion than he had adopted on the campaign trail.

“This office has a way of waking you up,” said Obama, who met with Trump for the first time last week. “Campaigning is different from governing. I think he recognizes that.”

Obama faced reporters crammed into the James S. Brady Briefing Room on Monday before leaving Washington for a week-long foreign trip to Greece, Germany and Peru, where he will meet with more than a dozen foreign leaders with their own set of questions about where the United States is headed under its next president.

The president said one of the most important missions he has in the coming week is to carry a message from Trump that the New York businessman is committed to upholding the NATO and transatlantic alliance.

Obama said he intends to tell European leaders that “there is no weakening” in America’s commitment “toward maintaining a strong and robust NATO alliance.”
 President Obama said during a news conference Monday that it's "healthy" for the Democratic Party to go through reflection. "When your team loses, everyone gets deflated," Obama said.(Victoria Walker/The Washington Post)

The president declined to answer a question on whether he still saw Trump as unfit to serve in the Oval Office — a criticism he had leveled more than once during the campaign — and instead emphasized that he had counseled the president-elect to reach out to some constituencies that had not supported his presidential bid.

“It is important to send some signals of unity” to minorities, women and other groups “that were concerned about the tenor of the campaign,” Obama said.

“And I don’t think any president comes in saying to himself, ‘I want to make people angry, or alienate half the country,’” Obama added, saying he saw Trump as “pragmatic” rather than “ideological.”

“That could serve him well,” the president said. He noted that Trump will come into office with “fewer set hard and fast policy prescriptions” than most of his predecessors.

Obama also acknowledged that Democrats need to engage in “some reflection” about the way forward after last week’s loss, which was punctated by a poor showing in both rural areas and the outer suburbs in swing states.

“I believe that we have better ideas, but I also believe that good ideas don’t matter if people don’t hear them,” he said. “We have to compete everywhere. We have to show up everywhere.”
Pressed repeatedly by reporters on how he viewed Trump’s character, the president praised him as a politician rather than as policymaker.


President Obama said that his administration "stands ready" to assist President-elect Donald Trump and his staff as they transition to the White House in January. (Victoria Walker/The Washington Post)

“What’s clear is that he was able to tap into, yes, the anxieties, but also the enthusiasm of his voters in a way that was impressive,” he said. He observed that Trump was “impervious to events that might have sunk another candidate. That’s powerful stuff.”

“Do I have concerns? Absolutely,” the president added. “He and I differ on a whole bunch of issues.”
And Obama cautioned that there are “certain elements of his temperament that will not serve him well, unless he recognizes them and corrects” them.

Going before the the press just after a major election is a rite of passage for the president. In Obama’s case, only one of these exchanges has been celebratory. While he could embrace his 2012 reelection victory, both the 2010 and 2014 midterms — and now, the election of his successor — have amounted to serious setbacks.

Six years ago, Obama called the Democrats’ congressional losses a “shellacking’; in 2014, he declined to characterize the results, saying instead to the American people, “I hear you.”

Obama hopes to use the trip to reassure America’s allies and to shore up some of his top international priorities before leaving office. He and other leaders will discuss issues including the global economy, the sanctions Western nations have imposed against Russia in retaliation for its annexation of Crimea, instability in the Middle East and the refugee crisis that has emerged in its wake.

After the news conference, Obama was scheduled to hold a conference call with congressional Democrats, who are still reeling from both the White House loss and the fact that they made just small gains in both the House and Senate.

Trump’s victory is sure to dominate Obama’s interactions with reporters and foreign leaders in the coming week. On Tuesday, the president will meet with Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, before departing Wednesday for Berlin. During his stop in Germany, he will meet with Chancellor Angela Merkel, as well as the leaders of Britain, France, Italy and Spain. At the end of the week, Obama will head to Lima, Peru, for the annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, where he will attend meetings with leaders from Asia and Latin America.

“Look, we certainly expect that the election will be the primary topic on people’s minds everywhere we go,” said White House deputy security adviser Ben Rhodes in a call with reporters Friday. “We have one president at a time, and so President Obama, of course, will be running through the tape on January 20th” on his top international and domestic priorities.

“We will run through the tape with the implementation of those policies, and then the new team will make their own determinations,” Rhodes said. “And we respect that every administration will make its own judgment.”

Leaders around the world are pondering whether the international order, with America at the center, can be sustained given the challenge it is facing not just in the United States but in nations ranging from the Philippines to Brazil.

In a sign of how Obama has already shifted into the mode of an outgoing president, he spoke with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto on Monday about taking “steps to solidify the relationship and institutionalize mechanisms of cooperation” that the two countries have established together, according to a White House statement.

Peña Nieto had initially been critical of Trump’s pledge to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, at Mexico’s expense, but subsequently softened his tone and invited Trump to meet with him in Mexico in September.

The Trump Administration's New Income Tax Ideas

The nuts and bolts of Trump’s new tax plan at this point

Donald Trump taxes

http://www.salem-news.com/graphics/snheader.jpgNov-14-2016
(SALEM, Ore.) - A historic year of political campaigning has just came to an end and the result of a bitter, divisive and sometimes surreal Trump campaign resulted in a win for the ex-reality star and business mogul.

No longer will he be known by “The Donald” but instead by “President Trump.” But what everyone is asking at this point – both those who voted for him and those who didn’t – is what the future is going to hold.

One of the biggest platforms that Trump was standing on was his tax ideas – and now that he’s in office, he has a chance to get them passed and implemented. But what exactly does Donald Trump have in mind? What will the tax situation look like in a year or two?

The Trump Administration’s Old Tax Plan

When the Trump presidential campaign was just starting (and everyone still regarded it as more of a political joke than anything else), NPR money analyzed Trump’s then-tax plan; to be blunt, it was abysmal.

It had lots of holes and problems and most importantly, showed a $12 trillion deficit over the current tax plan – which meant that if the country were to sustain those tax cuts over a decade, it would have to cut spending by 25% - or come up with some other way to get the money, which would logically mean borrowing it.

Yes, that’s right. Donald Trump wanted to get rid of a fourth of government services, thereby rendering them ineffective – and bear in mind this includes everything from welfare to military –or add another $12 trillion to the already $18 trillion that the country already owes.
Essentially, Trump wanted to almost double our debt.

Donald Trump’s New Tax Plan

Obviously, that wasn’t popular with voters and the team immediately came up with a better one. Enter the administration’s “new” tax plan.

The word plan is used here, but in reality, there are a couple of versions and it is difficult to nail down exactly what Trump intends to do. Here are the basics of Trump’s new tax plan as it relates to income tax:

Tax Brackets: Trump wants to simplify the income tax brackets, changing them from seven to three. Those three brackets will be:

12% - $0-$75,000 (Income of Married Couple)

25% - $75,000 to $250,000 (Income of Married Couple)

33% - $250,000 and up (Income of Married Couple)

This is a change from the previous tax brackets which ranged from 10% to 25% for up to $150,000 in joint income and 39.6% for married incomes above $466,000. You can check out the full tax bracket here.
For some people, this will mean lower taxes. For others – particularly some middle-class Americans – their taxes will be higher, partially because Trump is repealing personal exemptions and “Head of Household” filing status.

Trump is also increasing the standard deduction amounts for both single filers and married couples and putting a cap on itemized deductions.

Other Financial Effects from Trump’s Plans

This is just some of the tax plan that Trump is proposing and there are actually a couple of different forms of it.

It isn’t clear exactly what will happen when the Trump Administration actually takes over and some experts are predicting that stock markets could crash while others think that the market might actually be healthier due to Trump’s presidency.

Either way, you want to make sure that you have a personal account advisor to handle your investments. Companies like Glenmore Investments make that a staple of their investment services and the company you choose should do the same. It is more important than ever now that Donald Trump has been elected.

Source: Salem-News.com Special Features Dept.

The Weekend Behind, The Week Ahead: Bias-Based Crimes in America, Elections in Bulgaria, Peace Deal in Colombia, Obama off to Europe

The Weekend Behind, The Week Ahead: Bias-Based Crimes in America, Elections in Bulgaria, Peace Deal in Colombia, Obama off to Europe

BY EMILY TAMKIN-NOVEMBER 14, 2016

Good morning! This week, President Barack Obama heads to Greece and Germany before the APEC Summit. According to a statement by Ben Rhodes, Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications, Europe was added to the trip “to once again signal our solidarity with our closest allies in the world and nations that have been among the President’s closest partners during his eight years in office, to express our support for a strong and integrated and united Europe … and to reinforce our support for the approaches that have been taken over the last eight years to try to promote economic growth, economic security, and global cooperation on a whole range of issues.”

But before we watch Obama’s effort to lock down a legacy in Europe before giving NATO-questioner President-elect Donald Trump the keys to the White House, let’s check in on what’s happened this weekend.

In the United States, both the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Council on American-Islamic relations have both reported increases in hate crimes in the days following the election of Trump. It is hard to say for certain whether the increase is just in the reporting, or whether these incidents — which include black freshmen at the University of Pennsylvania receiving “lynching” texts and a truck draped in a Confederate flag driving through an anti-Trump rally in Syracuse, NY — are related to Trump’s election or campaign rhetoric.

In other Trump-related news: On Saturday, the President-elect met with British politician and Brexit champion Nigel Farage. Also on Saturday, Marion Le Pen, niece of National Front president Marine Le Pen, tweeted that she had accepted Trump campaign CEO Stephen Bannon’s invitation “to work together.” Bannon was expected to be named Trump Chief of Staff; now, however, many are reporting that that role will be filled by GOP head Reince Priebus. President-elect Trump himself seems to have spent much of Sundayreceiving congratulatory phone calls and resenting the New York Times.

But America’s were not the only elections that took place last week. On Sunday, the relatively pro-Russian Rumen Radev, who has promised pragmatism in balancing the whims and wishes of the European Union, NATO, and Russia, was elected president of Bulgaria. A similar situation is expected in Moldova — that is, pro-Russia Igor Dodon looks likely to win — but results will be announced on Monday.
Elsewhere in Eastern Europe, the World Health Organization warned of a measles outbreak in Ukraine, which, at present, has the lowest vaccination rates in the world.

The Colombian government and the rebels reached another peace deal several weeks after voters rejected the deal reached in a referendum. Per theAssociated Press, “The latest agreement aims to address some of the concerns of opponents of the original accord, who said the deal was too lenient on a rebel group that had kidnapped and committed war crimes.” It unclear whether the government will put this new deal to a new popular vote — one of many things we will watch this coming week.

Photo credit: DANIEL MIHAILESCU/AFP/Getty Images

Let’s give Trump a chance

Donald-Trump-Caricature-Photo-from-Max-Goldberg

Now that Trump, who was vilified by his opponents as an obscene charlatan and no respecter of women’s dignity has been elected, the question is, “Will he make America great, in keeping with his campaign slogan, or will he drag America into depravity?

by Ameen Izzadeen

( November 13, 2016, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) When George W. Bush, a highly disliked president worldwide for his gung-ho policies and wars across the globe, was reelected in 2004, the London Daily Mirror, in a banner headline, asked, “How can 59,054,086 people be so dumb?”
Though no global newspaper had a similar headline On Wednesday, many people who hoped for a Hillary Clinton victory and feared the triumph of Donald Trump asked, “How could 59,611,678 Americans be so idiotic?”

Post-mortem examinations are galore as to how Trump won. CNN analyst Van Jones invented a word to call the victory a ‘whitelash’, meaning it was the angry white vote or revolt against an Afro-American President. Some blamed the third party candidate for the Hillary Clinton defeat, while others pointed their fingers at FBI chief James Comey for announcing the reopening of the email probe during the final stages of the campaign. Some criticised Clinton’s strategy, style and failure to say what each segment of the voting public wanted to hear from her. Her plan to revive the economy was unappealing. She virtually personified the establishment which the average voter wanted to defeat. In the end, it is a combination of all these factors that led to the Trump victory. So it is unfair to label all those who voted for Trump as racist, uneducated and illiberal.

Trump was easy to beat but the Democratic Party insisted on fielding Clinton, a highly disliked candidate. The party leadership conspired to defeat Bernie Sanders, her contender for the party’s nomination. Many analysts say if Sanders had been the party’s candidate, he would have defeated Trump. Being a businessman, Trump used his skills, acumen and marketing strategies to reach the voter. He was like the crafty salesman who sold refrigerators to Eskimos. And his voters knew politicians rarely keep their promises.

Now that Trump, who was vilified by his opponents as an obscene charlatan and no respecter of women’s dignity has been elected, the question is, “Will he make America great, in keeping with his campaign slogan, or will he drag America into depravity?

In his acceptance speech on November 9, Trump appeared uncharacteristic of his usual self. Instead of the usual ‘lock her up’ remark, he sounded gracious and spoke highly of Clinton. He appealed for American unity. The wall and the ban on Muslims entering the United States did not figure in the victory speech. The speech gave an indication that President Trump may be different from Candidate Trump and allayed, to some extent, the fears he was stoking by his outlandish utterances on the campaign trail.
His world-shaking victory was remarkable – a political earthquake with immeasurable magnitude, because his own party leadership had abandoned him. His was a virtual lone battle. Although Clinton won the popular vote, he won the electoral college, defying opinion polls and pundits’ predictions.

Trump’s victory cannot be construed as America’s unwillingness to send a woman to the White House. Rather it is about hope and delivery. Obama was elected not because the Americans wanted their first Afro-American president. He won because the American people saw him as a leader who could deliver. His slogan ‘Yes we can’ was so appealing that the working class, the whites, the blacks and the Hispanics, gathered around him.

So this time, too, the voters, especially in the mid-America, wanted change, and placed their faith in a non-politician who thought differently, campaigned differently, and appeared as a leader who could deliver, who could improve the lot of the working class people struggling to make ends meet.
His party is now rallying behind him and it now controls both the houses of Congress and the Supreme Court.

In the United States, the President cannot be a dictator even if he or she wants to be one. The government system comprising powerful democratic institutions is well protected with checks and balances, giving little space for abuse of power. For instance, Trump as President will not be able to declare martial law without Congressional approval. Neither can he use his powers as Commander-in-Chief in an arbitrary manner to order armed forces to deport Muslims or Mexicans. Any unconstitutional act or abuse of power can lead to the impeachment of the President. Besides, US laws demand that troops disobey unlawful orders even if such orders come from the Commander-in-Chief. Also US laws – especially, the Posse Comitatus Act – do not permit the military to engage in law enforcement activities unless Congress approves such a role. So there is little possibility that Trump will become a Hitler.

There is also the extra-constitutional mechanism – the establishment or the Oligarchy — in operation to check the powers of the President. Trump may have stood against the Oligarchy. But once in office, he will have to go along with it.

During the hustings, he declared that the system of election was rigged and that he would drain the swamp of corruption. But once in office, whether he would be able to clean the stables is a big question. John F. Kennedy after being elected as President tried to be independent of the system, but he was assassinated.

Barack Obama tried to challenge the establishment and bring peace to the Middle East, but failed miserably. He realised that the establishment or the Oligarchy comprising Wall Street, the arms lobby and the powerful media conglomerates, among others, was stronger than the president. Before long Trump will also learn that wars, injustice and mass misery worldwide are part of the dirty strategy that keeps America going. The swamp is too huge to be drained by one man. Besides, he is not a messiah the Americans have been waiting for to turn their country into a haven of morality. The wealthiest person to run for president, Trump is a ruthless ‘hire-and-fire’ businessman, thinking in terms of profits and losses.

But the billionaire real estate tycoon, who is an economics degree holder from the University of Pennsylvania, could be different. He was a boss and would not like to be bossed around by the Oligarchy. We will have to wait and see how just and independent he would be; or how controversial and preposterous his presidency would be.

Give him time. Anti-Trump protests we saw yesterday across America may be little too early, although we read in the social media complaints by Muslim women that Trump’s white supremacist supporters have forcibly removed their hijabs and hurled verbal abuse at them.

Wait for at least the first 100 days in office and see whether he would implement his evil promises such as lifting the ban on torture or see whether the white supremacists such as Ku Klux Clan members will have a field day under his presidency. If such things happen, then put pressure on him to step down or impeach him. Thankfully, the Americans have elections every four years.

Malaysia: Whistleblower lawmaker sentenced to 18 months prison for exposing 1MDB audit

People's Justice Party lawmaker Rafizi Ramli speaks during an election campaign ahead of Malaysia's 13th general election in Kuala Lumpur . Pic: Wikimedia CommonsPeople's Justice Party lawmaker Rafizi Ramli speaks during an election campaign ahead of Malaysia's 13th general election in Kuala Lumpur . Pic: Wikimedia Commons
14th November 2016
A MALAYSIAN court has sentenced a prominent Malaysian opposition lawmaker — who has a reputation as a whistle blower — to 18 months jail for releasing a classified document on the controversial 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal.
A rights group slammed the jail sentence as a “dangerous chill” on free speech that could lead to a more repressive and unaccountable government.
Rafizi Ramli, vice president of the People’s Justice Party (PKR), was found guilty by the court on Monday on two charges of violating the Official Secrets Act by possessing and disclosing part of a government audit report on the indebted 1MDB fund, founded by Prime Minister Najib Razak.
Rafizi, who often makes allegations on alleged government wrongdoing, said he will appeal. He risks being disqualified from running in the next general elections due in 2018.
The sessions court judge Zulqarnain Hassan said the lawmaker will serve the 18-month jail sentence concurrently for the two charges, Free Malaysia Today reported.
Malaysia’s constitution bars a person from being a parliamentarian for five years if he or she is sentenced to more than on year in prison or fined more than RM2,000.
Responding to the verdict, Rafizi said, however, that he will continue doing the work of parliamentarian to the best of his abilities.
“The verdict is not at all unexpected, I would have gotten the shock of my life if I was acquitted today, so it’s as expected and I could have seen it from the very beginning – judging by how quick the process has taken place,” he told reporters outside the courtroom.
Rafizi, in pointing out the short duration it took for him to be convicted, said he was arrested in early April and the case concluded in October.
He said he believed that he had strong grounds to appeal the verdict and sentencing and his lawyers were working immediately to take the case to the the higher courts.
“Yet at the same time I am realistic enough to understand that this is a political case and therefore unless and until the leadership of the judiciary, not only consider themselves as being independent, but be seen and convinced by the public that they are independent,” he said.
Rafizi was charged with leaking a page from the 1MDB audit report during a press conference in March despite the government’s move to place the document under the Official Secrets Act.
The sovereign fund, known as 1MDB, was created in 2009 by Prime Minister Najib Razak to promote economic development projects.
1MDB is currently the subject of numerous multi-agency probes across the world, as well as a civil lawsuit filed recently by the United States’ Department of Justice (DoJ).
According to U.S. prosecutors, fund officials have diverted more than US$3.5 billion through a web of shell companies and bank accounts abroad.
Despite the allegations, Najib, who chairs the fund, has vehemently denied any wrongdoing in the handling of 1MDB, from which hundreds of millions dollars were found deposited in his personal bank accounts.
Anti-government dissidents in Malaysia have been campaigning long and hard against Najib, who they believe is corruptly involved in the 1MDB scandal.
On Nov 19, the nation’s largest protest movement known as the Coalition of Free and Fair elections is expected to hold a mass rally calling for Najib’s resignation.
Additional reporting by the Associated Press