Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Sunday, November 13, 2016

Chandrika Exposes Mahinda Rajapaksa Lock, Stock And Barrel


Colombo Telegraph
November 13, 2016
Former President Chandrika Kumaratunga exposed as to how her immediate successor former President Mahinda Rajapaksa had demanded and received bribes from Chinese companies.
Chandrika Kumaratunga
Chandrika Kumaratunga
In a candid interview named ‘Sambhasana’ aired by the Independent Television Network on the 8th of November 2016, the former president Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga stated as to how her immediate successor and former President Mahinda Rajapaksa demanded monies to the value of 50% from all six projects she had signed with the Chinese government prior to her departure from office.
She also stated that the Chinese Ambassador personally visited her at home in Colombo and complained that all six projects such as the Norochchali Coal Power Plant, Magampura Hambantota Port, Nelum Pokuna Theatre and the Katunayake Airport Highway were in danger of not going ahead due to the demands made by the Rajapaksa led government.
The former President CBK citing an example said “After much scrutiny our government had found the best experts in China to complete the Norochchalai Coal Power Plant Project for US $ 280 million. However after Mahinda Rajapaksa took over office he had got down the contractors from China and demanded 50 % of that value from them. They said that it was impossible to part with that kind of money as even they were making only 25% profit from the project. He asked them to then ”get out’ and the signed contract and project was terminated. The Mahinda Rajapaksa led government then signed a new contract to the value of US $ 520 million with an unknown and inexperienced company in handling such projects. These are the reasons as to why even today we are having problems with the Norochchalai Coal Power Plant”.
The former President in her hour long interview also covered several topics such as the disappearance and murders of Lasantha Wickrematunge and Prageeth Ekneligoda. Besides expressing her displeasure in the slow manner that the investigations were ongoing she also went on to express her dissatisfaction in the manner that even the exhumed skeletal parts of Wasim Thajudeen were handled.
According to our diplomatic sources the Chinese diplomatic community in Colombo are currently not happy with Kumaratunga’s revelations. ( By Janaka Ranaweera )

Foreign Ministry summoning Chinese ambassador

 
Chinese Ambassador Yi Xianliang with Sri Lanka President Maithripala Sirisena (File photo)
article_imageBy K. Godage- 

Former Ambassador

(godage@gmail.com)

The writer is both shocked and surprised that the government has apparently taken exception to a statement made by Chinese Ambassador in Colombo, Yi Xianliang, at a recent press briefing. It was reported that he had, in response to a question, stated that corruption allegations were Sri Lanka’s problem and that the Chinese government need not accept responsibility. I presume the question was asked because it is alleged that in almost all project costs have been inflated to bribe certain politicians and that we the unfortunate taxpayers are being cheated. If a Chinese government owned corporation has been involved then most definitely it has to take the responsibility for this situation, but if it is an independent Chinese company, in today’s ‘new China’ (there are many such entities) their government cannot be held responsible for their faults. Incidentally, the Chinese government is also in the process of cracking down on corruption and many senior politicians have been taken to task. The Chinese ambassador has also clarified issues concerning interest rates on loans granted by his country.

This government, after it came into office, foolishly adopted what was perceived as a hostile attitude towards China, perhaps because its predecessor had cultivated a close relationship with China. The government’s attitude seems to have changed following President Maithripala Sirisena’s visits to China.

Yes, the allegation that the previous government had a close relationship with China and government Ministers and some others had creamed off millions by granting ‘generous concessions’ for projects such as the Port City Project had, no doubt, influenced this government’s attitude towards China. But, the present administration must realise that Sri Lanka’s relations with China is, indeed, a very special and precious one and that we owe them a debt of gratitude for the assistance we have received in the past and particularly during the country’s war with the LTTE; only China and Pakistan helped Sri Lanka at that time. I need to also flag the fact that it was China that assisted us at the UN by preventing the Western powers from using the Security Council to stop the war when the LTTE was about to be wiped out. Britain, France and the US having failed to make the UNSC stop the war, next sought to intervene, citing the Right to Protect (R2P) Resolution of the UN General Assembly (adopted after the genocide in Rwanda).

China has not only assisted us in international forums but her assistance over the years has been more than significant. She has always treated us as a ‘special friend’ because Sri Lanka was the only country that gave them rubber, a strategic commodity, during the Korean War. No Chinese government has ever forgotten this. I wish here to recall that on an official visit to China with the late Mr. Lakshman Kadirgamar––I was Additional Foreign Secretary at that time––he was asked by then President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga to find out what we owed the Chinese government for the government to government defence assistance. Our Foreign Minister was extended the courtesy of meeting the Prime Minister for official talks. Minister LK told the Chinese PM that he had been asked by our President to find out what our country owed China for the military assistance we had received from the government, the PM then consulted his officials and after many minutes of discussion, stated "please inform Madam President that we have not asked!" Such was the manner in which they treated Sri Lanka. So, let’s not spoil that relationship by raising innocuous issues with China, perhaps at the instance of itinerant politicians who would not be even remembered a few years from now. We must reciprocate the warm and friendly relations which Sri Lanka has had with China for centuries. Sri Lanka has an enduring, multi-dimensional and deep-rooted relationship with China. The long-standing ties of friendship between the two countries are underpinned by mutual trust and confidence. A close identity of views and mutuality of interest remains the hallmark of their bilateral relations.

We must maintain the closest of relations with both China and India in our own interest. We need to ensure that one will not be at the expense of the other. I was once told by a Chinese Foreign Minister: "We will not do anything to give any country reason or an excuse to destabilise your country, and we will never interfere in your internal affairs."

Investigations begin into the phone calls exchanged with the allegedly murdered youth in Weerawansa’s house


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -12.Nov.2016, 11.45PM)  Investigations have begun relating to  7 mobile phone calls in connection with the alleged murder of the youth Lahiru Janith Dissanayake while he was staying   in Wimal Weerawansa’s house on that fateful night.
Based on the report of the data gathered pertaining to the 7 phone calls  exchanged with the  allegedly murdered youth , investigations have been initiated . The police  requested the Kaduwela magistrate to grant permission to further investigate these telephone call exchanges via three relevant telephone companies . The Kaduwela  magistrate court acceded to the request. The Kaduwela magistrate Dhammika Hemapala while granting the request directed the relevant  phone companies to provide  the report sought.
Meanwhile , the report pertaining to  the portion of the body of the youth (body found on October 26 th),  which  was sent to the government analyst department for investigation has not been received although 16 days have elapsed.


---------------------------
by     (2016-11-13 00:49:39)

Report on Abuse By NCPA officer

Report on Abuse By NCPA officer
Nov 13, 2016

The Minister of women and Children's affairs Chandrani Bandara is awaiting the report on the investigations into the alleged abuse of a young boy by an officer of the National Child Protection Authority NCPA , the Ministry said .

The Lankanewsweb , we also reported this story in several times . The officer had allegedly abused the boy in Kurunegala and a complaint over the incident was lodged on the NCAP hotline .
However the NCAP chairperson said there was an attempt to derail the investigations and NCAP is always committed to protecting Children in an unbiased manner and this case is no different.
The NCAP the agency give the responsibility to protect children , is facing allegations of attempting to protect an officer accused of abusing the young boy.
AshWaru Colombo

Draining The Swamp


Colombo TelegraphBy Sarath de Alwis –November 13, 2016
Sarath de Alwis
Sarath de Alwis
Donald Trump prevailing over Hillary Clinton is a matter that gives contemplative satisfaction to those who wish for ethical governance. During the primaries, I desperately hoped that Bernie Sanders would succeed Obama. The triumph of Trump is a consolation prize. Had Hillary won she would have reversed the process of 2008. In contrast, the Trump presidency is only a temporary setback. Bigotry is curable. Humbug is incurable. Sanders has spoken. Sad but not surprising.
Obama should have endorsed Sanders at the primaries. He could have taken a cue from Senator Elisabeth Warren. If he displayed the same disdain as Senator Warren did for the Clinton candidacy during the primary season, Sanders would have won the Democratic Party’s nomination and the presidency.
Obama earned the Nobel Prize no sooner he assumed office. He did not earn it. He did not and still does not deserve it. The Norwegian parliament decided that the award would be a fitting celebration of ‘Ugly Americans’ electing an African American who had read St. Augustin’s Just war theory.
“I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments, but rather as affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations” Obama intoned in his Nobel acceptance. That is the rub. Americans cannot afford Americans global leadership. Obama leaves the White House as the cleanest President after Harry Truman. Not a whiff of scandal. He failed the millennials. He failed to make what is important measurable. He opted for the convenient by measuring the trivial.
It is possible that Trump would share the Nobel Prize with Putin. The horse sense of the two mercurial manipulators may manage to stop the carnage in Syria and Iraq.
In the digital age, the discourse on ethical conduct in politics has reached a crisis level in all democracies fake, real and quasi. Laws alone cannot ensure a just society. Promises alone cannot
deliver us from the evil of greed that makes it routine for politicians to plunder public resources.
Spotless white does not conceal politics of hogwash. We learnt that bitter lesson when our Reforming president announced that ‘khaki’ is the colour of heroism and that glitter of medals should supersede the rule of law.
No surprise. We are trapped in a Hegelian conundrum. The German philosopher who inspired Marx continues to animate political thinking even to this day. In ‘Philosophy of the right’ Hegel offers a classic example emblematic of the riddle that continues to baffle us. When a father inquired about the best method of educating his son in ethical conduct, a Pythagorean replied: “Make him a citizen of a state with good laws” As civil society activists in Sobhitha thero’s movement have discovered, good laws are meaningless if good people do not administer them.
What happened in America is easily explained. The brilliant cynic Gore Vidal observed “We are the United States of Amnesia, which is encouraged by a media that has no desire to tell us the truth about anything, serving their corporate masters who have other plans to dominate us. The US media is flooded with their peculiar Brahmin beliefs. The American melting pot has been replaced by a tossed salad of multi-cultural, multi lingual communities. As this is written American cities are exploding with ill-concealed displays of identity affirmations.
‘Draining the swamp’ in Washington is what Donald Trump promised early in his campaign. It was a ‘natural’ and ‘archetypal’ metaphor that came easily to the real estate Moghul. It was authentic because Trump used it, early in the campaign, when he was firing from the hip stubbornly refusing to rely on the teleprompter. The ‘teleprompter equips politicians to hide ‘Jekyll’ and sound ‘Hyde’. Trump was blessed with a thicker hide. It was a profound, unfeigned expression of the anti-establishment billionaire buccaneer. He honestly believes that America should mind its own business and leave others to mind their businesses.

Donald Trump Phenomenon and Lessons Therein

When Trump contested for the presidency, all forces and apologists behind the current neo-liberal globalization process went against him. The global news media and all pollsters predicted that he would be the loser. They were pathetically biased. It is understandable if a leader of a country took a position on the American presidential elections, given the highly polarized political positions between the two candidates.

Trumpby Laksiri Fernando

( November 13, 2016, Sydney, Sri Lanka Guardian) At the recently concluded US presidential elections, both Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump represented two political extremes with dubious personal track records. It was no surprise, therefore, that in this biggest Western democracy in the world, only 56 percent of voters turned up at the polling booths to cast their votes. Another reason for this disillusionment was the acrimonious way the competition and the debates were conducted by the two candidates and the ‘two parties.’ There were many who openly said that they have no faith in either of them prior to the polling day. Now the leaders have come together at the White House, aftermath of the elections, the people are still protesting in streets misguided by acrimonious campaigns.

Regaining Paradise with Donald Trump




Featured image courtesy Associated Press

TISARANEE GUNASEKARA on 11/13/2016
…the issues you fought the election on resonated far beyond the borders of the USA. With your election…we look forward to a new world order based on the principles of the sovereign equality of all nations and non-interference in the internal affairs of nation states.” 
Mahinda Rajapaksa’s message to Donald Trump[i]
“Our message is that Americans should draft a policy not to take away the independence and sovereignty of other nations.” 
Afghan Taleban’s message to Donald Trump[ii]

Money Laundering at Sri Lankan Foreign Ministry

inside_exposed_story

– One Indian and Two Sri Lankan Briefly detained at BIA

(November 13, 2016, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) A “Coordinating Secretary” of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mr. Mangala Samaraweera who is suspected to be involved in money laundering was briefly detained along with two of his kingpins at the Bandaranaike International Airport ( BIA) , reliable sources informed the Sri Lanka Guardian.

One Sri Lankan national known as Farooq and an Indian national came along with the bureaucrat of the ruling alliance to take the UL 123 flight to Chennai. Then the suspects were detained by the security authority after they have found to be carrying illegal bunches of money suspected to be laundered in India.

After series of arguments the bureaucrat who is the Chairman of the Colombo Commercial Fertiliser Company, Director of Sri Lanka Telecom Mobitel and works  as the Coordinating Secretary to Minister Mangala Samaraweera,  was able to manipulate the situation and get free himself .

No official action has been taken apart from chagrining hundred thousand fine and severe warning to the Indian before he was released. One of two Sri Lankan was released after warnings but no word against the bureaucrat who masterminded the modus operandi. Subsequently the trio had taken the following day’s flight and flown to Chennai with the money.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mangala Samaraweera

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mr. Mangala Smaraweera It is laughable that Prime Minister Modi who is claiming to attempt to eliminate black money from India and has banned certain notes but corrupt  officials  all-around jumping on his head. Likewise, the ruling alliance in Sri Lanka which is chanting the anti-corruption mantra seems blind and deaf to the dirty games played by custodians of power   within the government.

Meanwhile, it has come to light that the above-mentioned bureaucrat was involved in series of such incidents but no one has taken action because of the political “power” he is exercising. Three questions can be raised regarding this shaming issue;
  • How many times has this person travelled and to how many countries has this person has been, to launder state money?
  • What are the direct and indirect assets of this person?
  • Who are the people in the government and other governmental institutions supporting this dirty game?
Our attempts to contact Minister Samaraweera to obtain his statement was unfortunately unsuccessful but we would like to keep our request open.

In the meantime, it has been revealed that this bureaucrat is playing an adverse role in attacking selected persons in the country by using a London-based Sri Lankan website. The issue regarding the particular website was questioned recently but the officials from the Criminal Investigation Division strangely kept mum. Most of anti-grift investigations were flawing under their hands and it is no surprise as to why landmark corruption cases were not in the priority listing.

Wall Can Be Erected Now; Let’s Move On


Colombo Telegraph
By Mano Ratwatte –November 13, 2016
Mano Ratwatte
Mano Ratwatte
It seems someone in Sri Lanka wasted coconuts engaging in irrational behavior to pray for Hillary’s victory. Logically that action is flawed. The problem is, if such deities exist, and they listen to prayers, they are not American Citizens nor do they have Greencards to influence the US election. It is likely they cannot influence American deities to help a certain candidate to win. So basically precious food was smashed, and wasted to try to seek divine intervention to what really are human thought driven processes. If these Deities can influence elections, it required them to send simultaneous SMS messages and subliminal messages to millions of American voters. Such a waste of a precious commodity.
In a stunning election night, the Republican nominee Trump, secured victory after a string of formerly Democratic states swung his way. Pennsylvania, Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin and Iowa all turned red. Nationally, Donald Trump won 47.4% of the vote to Hillary Clinton’s 47.7% – yet this translated into 290 electoral college votes for the Republicans and 228 for the Democrats (BBC)
If President Sirisena’s election was a rainbow coalition of Inclusiveness, Trump’s election was one of clear Exclusionary demographics. White non-Hispanic voters went to Trump by a whopping 58% to 37%. Hillary’s percentage of black votes also fell from Obama’s 93% to 88% and that is massive except when you consider total number of votes cast in the battleground states. The US is racially and economically divided, angry and polarized. Trump neither knows nor cares about Sri Lanka but is likely to defer to advice from the professionals including Keshap. There will be significant changes in the State Department and political appointees of the Obama regime including Samantha Power, and Biswal will no longer get US Tax payer funded trips to Colombo to pressure the regime.
College graduates backed Clinton by a 9-point margin (52%-43%), while those without a college degree backed Trump 52%-44%. In 2012, there was hardly any difference between the two groups: College graduates backed Obama over Romney by 50%-48%, and those without a college degree also supported Obama 51%-47%. White College educated voters also went to Trump by a 4% margin.Clinton
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) may have helped scuttle Democratic nominee’s aspirations to win the Presidency. However she cannot just try to blame that for a series of missteps and the reality than 60% of Americans did not like either candidate. As this writer said it once predicted, it was a Seismic election. A leaked conversation between Mrs. Clinton and some of her key donors suggests that she blames FBI Director Comey, because he reopened the investigation when they discovered her emails in an unrelated investigation into her close confidante Huma Abedin’s estranged husband ex Democratic Congressman the deviant Anthony Weiner; he was being investigated for sexting with a minor. That incident broke her momentum. She had the momentum after the 3 debates but lost it after FBI director Comey made the announcement. Was he doing that to influence the election or to stem threatened leaks from anti Clinton FBI field agents? He was after all a registered Republican who had donated to Republican candidates.

Palestinian athletes face Israeli hurdles

Gaza’s al-Zeitoun stadium, bombed by Israel in the summer of 2014 and photographed in October 2014.-Mohammed Asad

Mousa Tawfiq-10 November 2016

He went, said Sami al-Daour, from living the dream to negotiating a nightmare.

“My life turned upside down,” the 28-year-old soccer player said as he was walking around the facilities of his new club in Gaza.

Al-Daour, now a midfielder with al-Ahli in Gaza City, is playing the game he loves. But a budding professional career has run head first into Israel’s regime of restrictions on Palestinian movement and his progress in the game has stalled.

“In August 2014, I moved to the West Bank and played for Shabab al-Khalil in Hebron. But I didn’t have a full permit from the Israeli authorities to move freely between the West Bank cities and villages.”

Al-Daour had come to Hebron on a short-term medical permit, but after a couple of months he switched teams and signed to play for al-Samoor. The club obtained a full permit for him and he played there for 18 months, he said.

“Signing for al-Samoor was a turning point. I got a permit, a good salary and had a promising future ahead of me.”

Then in March, Israeli soldiers broke into his house in the center of Hebron. He was arrested and taken to Ashkelon prison in the south of present-day Israel. Two other Palestinian soccer players were also arrested that month.

“My family had sent me my laptop from Gaza so I could play video games during my free time,” al-Daour recalled. “Then one day, 50 soldiers stormed my house. I was playing a soccer game on the computer at the time. They took my laptop and arrested me.”

Al-Daour spent three days under interrogation and seven days in Ashkelon prison, he said, before he was sent back to Gaza.

“The Israelis accused me of having information on my laptop that threatened the security of the State of Israel. Although they found nothing, I was expelled to Gaza, and I have been trying to get back [to Hebron] since.”

Stuck in Gaza

Israel has since released the laptop to the Palestinian side, though al-Daour has yet to take possession. The young man, now signed with al-Ahli club, said the move has proven to be a step down for him in terms of the game he loves.

“It’s incomparable. There is a real professional league in the West Bank. Matches are broadcast on TV and players work hard to be on the national team. In addition to better living conditions – electricity, clean water and freedom of movement – I was paid more than $2,000 per month. In Gaza, I can barely get 400.”

“I have a degree in accountancy and I’ve never been in any political or military movement. I chose to follow my talent and passion. As a soccer player, I will retire in a few years – if I don’t have a serious injury that ends my professional life earlier. With this salary, my future is in real danger,” he said.

“My case was sent to FIFA [the international football federation] and I’m waiting for a response. With the help of the Palestinian Football Association, I hope to go back to my club in the West Bank.”

Sport has been “dramatically affected” by Israel’s decades-long military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, said Muhammad al-Amasi, the assistant secretary general of both the Palestinian Football Association and the Palestinian Olympic Committee. Al-Amasi said he was familiar with al-Daour’s case, but that it was not unique.

Successive wars on Gaza and the political division between Gaza and the West Bank, he said, have left athletes unable to compete and united national leagues impossible.

“Our greatest problem is the difficulty of getting out of the Gaza Strip, to the West Bank or other countries.”

According to al-Amasi, athletes from Gaza are regularly invited to local, regional and international events, but are routinely refused travel permits by Israel.

“Palestine is the only country that has two leagues and two national teams because of the difficulty of movement. For example, when a team of 11 players wants to leave Gaza for a match or an external training camp, only three or four players get permission, and the whole trip is canceled.”

Devastated lives and infrastructure

Officials suffer the same problems. In early August, three Palestinian Olympic representatives from Gaza, including the head of the team, Issam Qishta, were prevented from leaving the coastal strip and joining the Palestinian team at the Rio Olympics.

“Each year, the Asian Football Confederation and FIFA send equipment to Gaza’s sports clubs,” said al-Amasi. “In addition, specialists and lecturers come to Gaza to train our athletes. But even if the experts can get in, the equipment usually gets detained in the Israeli ports, so we pay more taxes to bring it back.”
Al-Amasi said the psychological effects of these Israeli restrictions are huge.

“Athletes prepare and train for months, and when they get rejected for illogical reasons just ahead of the tournament they had been preparing for it leaves them hugely disappointed and in despair. We try to change the situation, but without the help of FIFA and the international community, nothing will change.”

Perhaps the most notorious case of a Palestinian athlete struggling against Israeli repression is that of Mahmoud Sarsak, a former member of the Palestinian national soccer team.

Sarsak, a Gaza resident, was detained at the Erez checkpoint in 2009, while traveling to the West Bank for a training session. He spent three years in Israeli prison without charge or trial. His family was not permitted to visit him throughout the time of his detention.

Sarsak was eventually released in July 2012 after he refused food for 90 days to protest his detention.
Since then, he has been campaigning to expose the impact of Israel’s policies on Palestinian sports.

Movement restrictions and arbitrary detention are not the only Israeli-erected hurdles Palestinian athletes in Gaza face.

During the 2014 Israeli offensive, a significant amount of Gaza’s sports infrastructure was heavily damaged, according to Alamasi, including Shabab al-Maghazi sports club, al-Shams sports club and the Palestinian Football Association’s building in Beit Lahia in the northern Gaza Strip. Athletes were among the more than 2,200 people killed and tens of thousands wounded.

“Thirty athletes were killed and 17 were seriously injured in the 51-day war,” said al-Amasi. “The headquarters of the Palestinian Football Association, 20 sports clubs and 10 fields were targeted by Israeli airstrikes.”

Shot 11 times

Athletes in the West Bank are also subject to violence by Israeli occupation forces.

In January 2014, cousins Jawhar Nasser Jawhar, 19, and Adam Abd al-Raouf Halabiya, 17, were going home after a soccer training session in the Faisal al-Husseini Stadium in al-Ram, a town near Ramallah.

On their way, they were ambushed.

“We were preparing to be on the national soccer team at that time. My cousin, Adam, wanted to light a cigarette, and everything happened in a flash,” Jawhar said.

First, Adam was shot in his legs. When Jawhar tried to carry him and call for help, he was shot himself: seven times in his left foot, three in his right, and one in his left hand.

The attack was perpetrated by an Israeli army unit. “After they had shot us, they unleashed a police dog before dragging us to the ground. They broke Adam’s leg even after shooting it.”

According to Nasser Jawhar, Jawhar’s father, after interventions from FIFA and international media, and with the help of Jordan’s Prince Ali bin Hussein, president of the his country’s` football federation and a 2015 FIFA leadership contender, Jawhar and Adam were transferred to King Hussein Medical Center in Amman.

But their football futures were finished and, while in Amman, the family prepared to sue the Israeli government.

“We spent two months in Amman. We were planning to sue after understanding that Adam and Jawhar wouldn’t be able to play again,” Nasser told The Electronic Intifada over the phone.

“Then on our way home, they arrested the kids and tried to make a deal with us.” They were presented with two options, said Nasser. Either “withdraw the suit and have our children out in 50 days, or stick to our decision without knowing the consequences.”

The consequences could have been dramatic as the family understood the army was preparing to claim that one of the boys had tried to throw a bomb at the soldiers. The family decided to back down, to save their children’s future.

Jawhar now coaches children and will graduate from the faculty of law at Al-Quds University this year. Adam studies business administration at the same institution.

“They won’t play again, but fortunately they have a successful life waiting for them,” Nasser Jawhar said.
Al-Daour, for his part, is still playing. But he is finding his enthusiasm waning.

“Although I play the game I love, I’m losing my passion. But I will keep playing football and I will believe in my chances of a better future.”

Mousa Tawfiq is a journalist based in Gaza.

Farage BLASTS Juncker for using Trump victory to 'destroy Nato and form an EU army'

sunday_express_logoNIGEL FARAGE has launched a scathing attack on the president of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker saying he has attempted to use Donald Trump’s US election victory to push forward with an EU army.


By  Sun, Nov 13, 2016

The interim  leader claimed that the president-elect is right to criticise the military alliance but that gives no cause for Mr to pursue his “ridiculous dream” of a European force.
Speaking after becoming the first British politician to meet the victorious Republican since the election last week, Mr  told Sky News: “You’ve got Jean-Claude Juncker using the election of President Trump as a means of trying to destroy Nato by pushing his ridiculous dream of a European army.”
Despite being a vocal critic of the alliance, the Brexiteer was adamant that Britain would need to act to ensure US-relations continue.
He continued: “I have to say when Trump says America should not continue to pick up such a big bill for Nato – I think he’s right the other members do need to pull their weight, and frankly there has been no proper reassessment of what Nato is ever since the Berlin wall came down over 25 years ago.
Nigel Farage, Jean-Claude Juncker and Donald Trump
Farage blasted Juncker for using Trump's election victory to push for an EU army


I think it will be wrong to view Trump as being a threat to our security
Nigel Farage
“I see this as being one of the reasons why it is vital that we have a good relationship with the USA because we are the bridge between America and the rest of the Nato members.
“And I would really want to see, at some point next year, a coming together of all Nato members to talk about their commitments, talk about its structure and to talk about the future.
“But the more we hear from the European Union that they wish to brush Nato aside the more I think it will be wrong to view Trump as being a threat to our security, but increasingly the European Union that is.”
The Brexit campaigner also claimed that Great Britain will be at the front of any queue for any post-Brexit trade deal with the US when Mr Trump takes up his position in the Oval Office.



He said: “Not just President-elect Trump, but his whole team, are Anglophiles..
“They like our country, they recognise what we’ve done together in the past and they’re coming into this with an incredibly positive view.
“That is good news – we need to seize the day.”
Ukip said the pair spent over an hour discussing the president-elect’s victory, global politics and the status of Brexit – after Downing Street didn’t seem keen for him to pursue the job of US ambassador to the UK.
On Twitter, Mr Farage posted: “It was a great honour to spend time with Donald Trump. He was relaxed and full of good ideas.
“I’m confident he will be a good president. His support for the US-UK relationship is very strong. This is a man with whom we can do business.
“I was especially pleased at his very positive reaction to the idea that Sir Winton Churchill’s bust should be put back in the Oval Office.”

Former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, left, and President-elect Donald Trump. (Tiziana Fabi, Timothy A. Clary/Agence France-Presse via Getty Images)

 

The similarities between former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi and President-elect Donald Trump run the gamut, including their fake tans and their brash talk. During the U.S. election season, however, Berlusconi remained quiet about the man many view as his American counterpart. But with the election wrapped up, he was more forthcoming, saying in an interview with the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera that the parallels between him and Trump are “obvious.”

“He, too, is an entrepreneur that at a point in his life decided to devote his skills and energies to his own country. And he was voted by all the Americans that are tired of old politics, shut in themselves, that have grown unable to listen and understand,” Berlusconi said “A policy that made the same mistake typical of the left all over the world: thinking that being 'politically correct' is the way to be close to people’s needs, without understanding that the actual weak are the citizens oppressed by the state, taxes, bureaucracy, uncontrolled immigration, unemployment, the terrorist threat.”

Berlusconi held Italy's highest office for about nine years, in four stints — the longest of any Italian leader since World War II. Before entering politics, he presided over a vast media empire and amassed wealth greater than Trump's, according to calculations by Forbes magazine. In 2012, a year after losing elections, he was convicted of tax fraud. The next year, he was convicted of paying an underage prostitute for sex, though the conviction was overturned on appeal a year later.

Both men have been accused of grossly and criminally abusing women yet have openly bragged about their sexual exploits. Both claim that their independent wealth means they have no stake in using political power to enrich themselves. Hailing from the business elite, they have railed against political elites of all ideologies, and voters have loved them for it. Berlusconi told Corriere della Sera that it would be incorrect to see Trump or him as part of a right-wing movement. Rather, he said, they are part of a populist center.

“I don’t represent ‘the right’, I represent a liberal middle of the people in which the best political traditions of our country came together: from the Catholic one to reformative socialism, liberalism and a democratic, responsible right,” he said. “As far as these political definitions go, and I think they're less significant by the day, my role has been and will always be this. About Trump’s economic policy, there are many similarities and some differences between [his] program and ours: [His] tax policies can be appreciated, as well as his focus on controlling migration . . . I don’t agree with his protectionist choices and the isolationist tendencies he expressed. But politics taught me that leaders must not be judged on their programs but on their actions. We’ll watch him at work.”

One foreign leader for whom both Berlusconi and Trump have expressed admiration is Russian President Vladimir Putin, who shares many of their traits, including populism and alleged womanizing. 
Recent reports suggest that Trump's presidential campaign was in touch with members of Putin's government, and Democrats repeatedly alleged that Putin's intelligence agencies were meddling in the U.S. electoral process to Trump's benefit. Berlusconi and Putin are close friends, and they often go on vacation and throw parties together.

“Trump understood something of fundamental importance: the Russian Federation needs be considered a full-fledged Western country,” said Berlusconi, echoing sentiments that Putin has voiced repeatedly. 

“We need Russia to face — together — the dramatic problems of the international arena: from Islamist extremism to the wave of migrants. Up until now President Putin has shown himself capable of facing the challenges of our time before and better than the other international leaders.”

Berlusconi, 80, is hoping to return to political relevance in Italy after his tax fraud conviction and health problems have kept him out of the limelight. On Dec. 4, Italy will hold a referendum on constitutional reform that is being seen as a vote of confidence in Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, who has threatened to resign if he loses the vote. Berlusconi's Forza Italia political party has recently been polling at about 12 percent.

Stefano Pitrelli in Rome contributed to this report. 

The Trump Explosion and the Fallout in Mexico

Will President-elect Trump shatter America’s most important bilateral relationship?
The Trump Explosion and the Fallout in Mexico

BY MICHAEL SHIFTER-12th November 2016

With the stunning victory of Donald Trump, the tremors of the political earthquake in the United States are being felt and absorbed around the world — but perhaps nowhere more acutely than in Mexico. From the outset of Trump’s seemingly far-fetched campaign for the presidency, Mexico has been the chief proxy for the two central issues at the heart of his message to an anxious electorate: immigration and trade.

The prospect that he might now attempt to put in practice his outlandish proposals on both have understandably heightened apprehension in our southern neighbor. What seemed like a bad dream has become reality. The already shaky peso has fallen by some 13 percent, to more than 20 pesos per dollar — its biggest drop in more than two decades.

Trump, notably incoherent on many ideas, has been nothing but consistent in his call to build a wall, paid for by Mexico, on the border with the United States, that would seek to keep out Mexicans who, he has repeatedly — and falsely — claimed, are “flooding” into our country. The idea is not only morally abhorrent and offensive, but manifestly impractical and would come with an exorbitant cost. Few believe it could actually be implemented (probably including Trump, though the promise worked politically).

Trump has also pledged to deport the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants now residing in the United States — the majority of whom are Mexican. This proposal, too, is unworkable and would be absurdly expensive. Though at points during the campaign, Trump slightly moderated this extreme, hardline position, his rhetoric and tone have generally been virulent. In his radical stance on immigration — with Mexico as his prime target — Trump cynically, though shrewdly, played on the national security fears of what he wrongly contended was an uncontrolled situation on the border, as well as the presence of millions of unauthorized migrants in the United States.

Of course, what has most alienated Mexicans — and, by extension, Latin Americans, and many Latinos in the United States — has been Trump’s nakedly bigoted language. His epithets of Mexicans as “rapists” and “criminals” and drug dealers have been profoundly hateful and insulting. For many Mexicans — some of whom I spoke with in Mexico over a year ago, well before Trump was the Republican nominee — the failure of other U.S. politicians and other leading figures to more forcefully and publicly repudiate such rhetoric was particularly hurtful. One prominent Mexican business leader told me that, as a result of such acquiescence, U.S.-Mexican relations “had been set back by some 20 years.” Even if Hillary Clinton had won, there would have been a lot of work to do to rebuild trust and repair the damage in bilateral relations.

Trump also used Mexico, along with China, to drive home his markedly anti-trade message, which resonated widely in the United States in this election — including in the Democratic primary, as expressed in Bernie Sanders’s formidable challenge to Clinton. Trump put his finger on a legitimate grievance felt by many left behind by the globalized economy.

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), with the United States, Mexico, and Canada, signed by Bill Clinton in 1994 and backed by Hillary, was Trump’s main target. He claimed that the deal was prejudicial for the United States and constantly complained that other countries “are taking our jobs.”Though Trump has promised to renegotiate NAFTA it is unclear whether he will follow through on his pledge. He has the authority to unilaterally withdraw from the agreement, but the economic costs of that decision would be prohibitive, as well as the political consequences of acting without the support of Congress. In any case, it is hard to imagine the future smiles and handshakes among the “three amigos” — the presidents of the United States and Mexico, and the Canadian prime minister — at the regular North American Leaders’ Summits.

Indeed, the relationship between Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan will be critical in determining the extent to which the real estate magnate implements policy changes both on trade and immigration. Ryan, after all, supports free trade agreements such as NAFTA and also embraces a far more liberal view on immigration, advocating a path to legal status for the 11 million undocumented. Having astutely employed his negative agenda on Mexico to be elected president, Trump will now have to turn to the task of governing and can no longer rely on empty slogans. His ability to keep his movement happy — yet deal with the Congress and act pragmatically in pursuing his agenda — will be tested.

However tempting it may be, it is a mistake, however, to believe that all Trump supporters back all of his preposterous ideas. A Mexican journalist who is based in Washington, D.C., and regularly (and bravely) covered Trump rallies throughout the campaign told me that the people he interviewed for the most part did not subscribe to his ideas about building a wall on the border or deporting millions of undocumented immigrants. They considered those proposals too radical and unrealistic. Rather, they attended the rallies because, to them, Trump was refreshingly straight-talking and seemed determined to shake things up in a corrupt Washington, which was ultimately the formula that got him elected.

Trump’s Mexico focus gained heighted prominence with his unexpected visit with President Enrique Peña Nieto in September, which he tried to use to show that he knew something about foreign policy and to “act presidential” on an issue so fundamental for his campaign. For Peña Nieto, who was deeply worried about what a possible Trump presidency would mean for Mexico, the visit proved particularly infelicitous and was savagely criticized at home, especially for the failure to stand up to Trump and reject his incendiary, ominous rhetoric.

Now that Mexicans’ worst fears have been realized, the country faces the dilemma of how to deal with the incoming U.S. president — whether to seek to deepen areas of bilateral cooperation such as jointly monitoring the border, or stand its ground and pursue a more independent course and greater distance from the United States.

For Trump, the question is whether he will fully fathom what is at stake for the United States and find a path that is less threatening and abusive than his rhetoric has been. After all, Mexico is America’s third-largest trading partner (after Canada and China) and millions of U.S. jobs depend on preserving that relationship. The two societies are profoundly and increasingly intertwined. People of Mexican origin represent around two-thirds of the total Hispanic population in the United States. According to Pew Research Center, in 2012, more than 22 million people born in the United States self-identified as Hispanic of Mexican origin. And, for what it’s worth, more than 8 million people visited Mexico from the United States in 2015, representing nearly 18 percent of all travel abroad by Americans.

Expectations in Mexico for an easy and cordial relationship with the Trump administration are extremely low. The wounds left by the campaign are deep and are likely to persist. Trump, though, has showed time and again that he is full of surprises and is able to defy expectations. Whether he will do so on what George W. Bush rightly characterized 15 years ago as America’s “most important bilateral relationship” is a big question.
Photo credit: YURI CORTEZ/AFP/Getty Images