Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, October 27, 2016

RSF unveils 22 nominees for 2016 Press Freedom Prize

RSF unveils 22 nominees for 2016 Press Freedom Prize
Oct 27, 2016

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) today released the names of the 22 nominees for the 2016 Reporters Without Borders-TV5 Monde Prize for Press Freedom, which will be awarded to three laureates – a journalist, a media outlet and a citizen journalist – at a ceremony in Strasbourg on 8 November. This is the 25th year running that RSF has awarded this prize.

Maldives - Zaheena Rasheed : 
 
Zaheena Rasheed is the editor of the Maldives Independent (former Minivan News), one of her country’s few remaining independent online media outlets. As a result of her courage and determination, she has come to embody the revival of journalism and the fight for media freedom in Maldives. She has dared to cover highly sensitive stories in a country where the most radical form of Islamism has taken hold, and she has not hesitated to criticize the authorities, including their culpable passivity in the investigation into fellow journalist Ahmed Rilwan’s disappearance in 2014. She was one of 16 journalists arrested in Malé on 3 April 2016 during a demonstration against the decline in media freedom. Their grievances included a court order closing the newspaper Haveeru, a new bill to re-criminalize defamation (which was decriminalized in 2009) and the lack of progress in the investigation into Rilwan’s disappearance.
 
Press release
https://rsf.org/en/news/rsf-unveils-22-nominees-2016-press-freedom-prize

Many journalists and bloggers have continued to distinguish themselves in 2016 by the immense courage they display in their daily reporting despite the risks to their lives. Many of this year’s nominees, who are from 19 countries, are being prosecuted or are in prison for refusing to censor themselves. Others are exposed to threats and physical violence from those they dare to criticize.
 
Read here the profiles of all the nominees
 
“Authoritarian regimes cracked down harder on journalists and bloggers in 2016, RSF secretary-general Christophe Deloire said. “It is no coincidence that nearly half of the nominees work in the bottom 20 of the 180 countries in RSF’s World Press Freedom Index. RSF hails the courage and determination of all these women and men with a common commitment to fighting for freedom of information.”
 
“A significant number of the nominees are unfortunately in the process of being prosecuted or are languishing in jail solely because they wanted to inform their fellow citizens about matters of public interest,” RSF programme director Lucie Morillon said.
 
“Those in prison include Egyptian journalist Ismail Alexandrani, Azerbaijani journalist Seymour Khazi and Chinese citizen journalists Chinois Lu Yuyu and Li Tingyu who, like many other citizen journalists all over the world, took over when the authorities stifled the traditional media. We call for their unconditional release and the withdrawal of all the charges against them.”
 
Nine journalists who take risks
 
A 29-year- old former nurse from Homs, Hadi Abdullah has had many brushes with death as a freelance reporter who became a target for both government forces and rebel armed groups and saw his cameraman killed. Afghan journalist Najiba Ayubi, the head of the Killid Media Group, has also been threatened with death but continues her fight for media freedom. 
 
Colombian investigative reporter Jineth Bedoya continues to defend women who have been the victims of violence while Maldives Independent editor Zaheena Rasheed embodies tenacity in the fight against impunity for crimes of violence against journalists. Rasheed covers highly sensitive stories in her now Islamist country and has been outspoken in her criticism of the authorities since one of her reporters, Ahmed Rilwan, disappeared in 2014. Fearing arrest, she finally fled Maldives in September.
 
Judicial harassment is a problem shared by Alfred Taban, the well-known founder and editor of South Sudan’s first newspaper, The Juba Monitor, Mahfuz Anam, the editor of Bangladesh’s Daily Star, and French investigative journalist Edouard Perrin, who helped to expose the LuxLeaks scandal in Luxembourg. But none of them is in prison. Egyptian investigative reporter Ismail Alexandrani and Seymour Khazi, a well-known reporter for Azerbaijan’s sole remaining opposition daily, Azadlig, are not so lucky. Both are jailed on trumped-up charges.
 
Seven pioneering independent media outlets
 
Seven media outlets distinguished themselves by their exemplary reporting in the face of constant harassment. Azamn, the Sultanate of Oman’s only independent newspaper, paid a high price for its independence this year. A court closed it down and imposed jail terms on its three most senior editors. The local correspondents of Fergananews.com, the website of Central Asia’s independent news agency Ferghana, are exposed to similar risks and its reporters in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan have to operate clandestinely.
 
The citizen journalists who report for Chinese human rights website 64Tianwang are still systematically persecuted but show no sign of giving up. As their editor, 2004 RSF Cyber-Freedom Laureate Huang Qi explained: “In 18 years of activity, none has ever agreed to sign a confession drafted by the authorities.” He was referring to the “confessions” that CCTV and Xinhua broadcast with the aim of discrediting government critics.
 
In Algeria and Libya, two media outlets that emerged just three years ago have made a name for themselves by being outspoken and resolutely defending media freedom. Radio M, the first Algiers-based independent web radio, airs a wide range of opinion in a country that gags the media. The Bawabat Al Wasat website has established itself as an essential source of news and information amid the chaos and mounting concern about security issues in Libya. It was blocked for nine months from February 2015 because of its coverage of the talks leading to the creation of the Government of National Accord.
 
Founded by Adam Michnik, the pro-European daily Gazeta Wyborcza has become a symbol of opposition to the excesses of the ruling Law and Justice Party, which is waging an all-out crusade against the media. Since its creation in 2011, the Brazilian non-profit news agency Agência Pública has produced many reports on environmental and human rights issues, some of them winning awards.
 
Citizen journalists step up
 
When the traditional media are unable fulfil their role properly, citizen journalists and bloggers take over the job of providing independently-reported news and information, often eliciting an angry response from the authorities. This is what happened to Chinese citizen journalists Lu Yuyu and Li Tingyu. After they suddenly stopped sending messages on 15 June, it emerged that they are being held for documenting unrest and work protests – taboo subjects for the ruling Communist Party.
 
Blogger Ali Al-Mearaj was arrested in June for criticizing the Bahraini regime and is now charged with supporting terrorism. Roya Saberi Negad, a Facebook user with British and Iranian dual nationality, has been detained in Tehran’s notorious Evin prison since October 2013, where she is serving a five-year sentence for criticizing the Iranian regime on Facebook. Tania Quintero and her son, Ivan García Quintero embody journalistic resistance and illustrate the difficulties of free speech in Cuba. She is now a political refugee in Switzerland while he has stayed behind and continues to write blog posts about censorship and the fight for independent journalism.
 
Former war reporter Leonardo Sakamoto keeps a blog about human rights in Brazil and the fight against modern-day slavery. He has often been defamed and threatened and was the target of major smear campaign in April 2016. Created in the space of a day when Burundi’s political crisis erupted in May 2015, SOS Média Burundi consists of a news website and a Facebook page where journalists posts news reports anonymously. It is come to be the main source of information about the crisis.
 
Now partnered with TV5 Monde, RSF’s annual Press Freedom Prize has been drawing attention to the importance of freedom of information since 1992 by honouring journalists and media outlets that have made a noteworthy contribution to the defence or promotion of this fundamental freedom. Each award comes with 2,500 euros in prize money.

COPE dilemma


yaha2


Editorial-October 27, 2016, 9:32 pm 


The Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) seems to have a couple of self-appointed spokesmen! Besides the officially appointed Chairman, Sunil Handunnetti, Deputy Ministers Sujeeva Senasinghe and Ajith Perera have announced what they call decisions of the watchdog committee.

Poor Handunnetti, following the last few COPE meetings and his dramatic walkout (or cop-out) looks as if he had seen a ghost. He has told Parliament that he will reveal his ordeal at stormy COPE sessions in recent times. He seems to have got an overdose of ‘yahapalanaya’ he and his comrades very enthusiastically together with the present-day leaders promoted before the last two elections.

Deputy Minister Senasinghe has told the media that there can be only a single COPE report. No individual committee member can issue a report, he has stressed. One is intrigued! There has been no separate report as such issued by any individual COPE member. The report we have been quoting from extensively in our recent news items is the one prepared by the COPE Chairman on behalf of the committee and endorsed by a majority of committee members present last Friday. There were 14 members and out of them eight endorsed the reports presented by Chairman Sunil Handunnetti; later three more members approved it. That is how democracy works.

Deputy Minister Ajith Perera claimed in Parliament the other day that eight MPs could not be considered a majority as the COPE had 26 members. If we are to conclude that nothing should be considered as being ratified by Parliament or a committee thereof unless it receives more than one half of the members then VAT (Amendment Bill) has not been passed. For, it has received only 112 votes out of 225. Resolutions, reports, Bills etc, supported by a majority of MPs present, are considered ratified unless the Constitution specifically mentions that they have to be passed by a majority of MPs including those not present. The bottom line is that the COPE Chairman’s report was passed last Friday and the UNP MPs resorted to strong-arm tactics to manipulate the committee process to dilute the document.

Let the COPE be urged to present to Parliament both its Chairman’s report approved by a majority of members present last Friday and the one with the UNPs observations, recommendations etc incorporated. After all, no less a person than Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe told Parliament the other day that everyone in the House had faith in the incumbent COPE Chairman!

Deputy Minister Perera, addressing the media last Friday, said the UNP MPs wanted to bring criminal charges against those involved in the alleged bond scams. He seems to have taken the public for suckers. If the government really wants to do so it ought to find out what has become of the file the UNP-led interim government referred to the Attorney General in June, 2015 on the questionable bond issues. That document must be gathering dust in the AG’s Department. Our information is that a pro-government bigwig in the department meddled with it to curry favour with the powers that be.

The big guns of the incumbent government, while they were in the Opposition, likened what the Rajapaksas were doing to the country after crushing terrorism to saving a damsel in distress and raping her. The damsel has again suffered a fate worse than death at the hands of those who ‘liberated’ her from the clutches of the Rajapaksas in January, 2015! The biggest ever financial crime has been committed on their watch with the champions of good governance shamelessly striving to shield the culprits.

Those who backed the present dispensation expecting a change for the better are disillusioned. The chief architect of the current administration, Ven. Maduluwawe Sobitha Thera was disillusioned and disappointed towards the latter stages of his life. Had he been alive he would definitely have taken on the incumbent rulers. The movement he created to campaign for social justice is only a shadow of its former self after his demise. People are left with no one to turn to. Their choice at a future election will be between old thieves and new thieves!

CBSL bond issue: COPE Chairman Handunetti vows to ‘reveal all’

untitled-3

By Dharisha Bastians -Wednesday, 26 October 2016 

logo
The Central Bank’s controversial bond auctions in 2015 and 2016 under former Governor Arjuna Mahendran continued to haunt the UNF-led Government yesterday, dominating heated debates in Parliament amid allegations that ruling party members were attempting to influence a legislative oversight committee to change its report on the controversy.

Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) Chairman Sunil Handunetti yesterday vowed to “reveal all” when he tabled a report on a 21-month investigation into the controversial treasury bond auction, amid apologies from Government committee members and calls by the Joint Opposition for the resignation of the Prime Minister over the scandal.

Making a brief intervention in the House last evening, Handunetti said he would tell the country everything that happened during COPE deliberations on the CBSL bond report.

untitled-2“We were planning to present the report. But a decision was taken at the Committee to present the report on the 25 October or during this week. The Committee will meet at 2.30 p.m. on 26 October. A part of the report has been sent for translation. We will discuss the matter further tomorrow and will submit the final report within the course of this week,” he said.

Joining the heated debate, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe requested Parliament to have faith in the Parliamentary Committee system and to wait till the report was published.

“You are calling me a thief but all the thieves are there on your side. Please go in front of the mirror to find thieves. The Central Bank incident was considered by the last Parliament. I have appointed the Pitipana Committee which has recommended assigning the investigation to Parliament. Thereafter the general elections were held. Now COPE is investigating this. We all need to find out the reasons for this,” he told the House.

Responding to an allegation by UPFA MP Wimal Weerawansa that there was an attempt to prevent the COPE report on the bond auctions being presented to Parliament, Wickremesinghe expressed confidence in COPE Chairman Sunil Handunetti and said the report would be tabled in the near future.

“The outcome could have several reports. We all elected a COPE Chairman and have faith in him. We need to strengthen the Committees of Parliament. I know the Chairman is shouldering a difficult task. If this investigation was conducted during the previous President’s tenure the report would not have come out for at least 10 years,” said the Prime Minister.

Handunetti stormed out of a third day of deliberations on the CBSL report on Monday, alleging that UNP members of COPE were trying to influence the Auditor General to change his report.

In a remarkable development, UNP COPE member and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Dr. Harsha De Silva apologised to Handunetti, if the Chairman had felt that the UNP members had wronged him and said any slight had been wholly unintended.

“When he left the meeting last evening, I ran after him,” said the Deputy Minister, “I said Sunil, please don’t go.”

De Silva said the UNP had “great respect” for Chairman Handunetti who had conducted affairs admirably within the legislative watchdog committee. He categorically denied that the UNP was carrying out a contract to protect certain individuals.

“I always work only according to my conscience, and my conscience is clear,” De Silva told the House last evening. He claimed that the UNP did not threaten the Auditor General as claimed in media reports. “I spoke to the Auditor General today for 45 minutes. I asked him about what has been reported in the press. I asked him if we had threatened him or insulted him. He replied that we had only been debating the technicalities,” the Deputy Foreign Minister charged.

Members of COPE were going public with allegations that the UNP was attempting to distort the report to protect individuals to fulfill various political agendas, De Silva claimed.

UPFA MP and Joint Opposition member Mahindananda Aluthgamage, who is also member of COPE, said the oversight committee was under heavy pressure from the Government as they probed the Central Bank issue.

“Never in the history of COPE has a Chairman of the committee been put under so much pressure and mental strain,” the Joint Opposition Member charged. “Never has a COPE Chairman been threatened by the members of the committee,” he added. Aluthgamage, who called for the Prime Minister to step down in light of the Central Bank scandal, claimed that former President Mahinda Rajapaksa had never interfered with COPE during his tenure.

Aluthgamage is an ardent loyalist of the former President, and made out in his speech in Parliament yesterday that COPE had been fully functional and independent under the previous regime. However, despite devastating findings by COPE about mismanagement and fraud in the State sector, the former Government never acted against officials and bodies against whom the oversight committee recommended disciplinary and legal action.

Sports Minister Dayasiri Jayasekera, a COPE member who also addressed the House on the Central Bank issue, said there was no way the oversight committee could present two reports on the bond auction. “It is the continuity of this Government that is at stake here if action is not taken on this issue,” he warned.

Parliament was scheduled to discuss a 1,500-page report on public enterprises compiled by COPE yesterday, but nearly every lawmaker taking the floor focused on the controversial CBSL bond auction the oversight committee is probing.

Government Ministers and Opposition Members pushed hard for a comprehensive investigation into Perpetual Treasuries and its connections to the former Governor of the Central Bank, and demanded that the report on the Central Bank Bond investigation by COPE be presented to Parliament this week. 

Corruption watchdog wants presidential inquiry 

A local corruption watchdog has called for an independent presidential commission to probe two controversial Treasury bond auctions following reports that major rifts had emerged inside COPE, the oversight committee investigating the issue.

In a statement released yesterday, the Anti Corruption Front said that there was information that COPE could present more than one report.

“If the members of the COPE are divided along party lines and present different reports or if some members go against the general consensus and attempt to justify former Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran, this is a serious concern,” the ACF said in its statement.

The watchdog said the bond “scam” was not just an abstract financial crime.

“Its fallout directly affects six million EPF beneficiaries and thus directly affects Sri Lanka’s social security net,” ACF warned.

Usually COPE uses information, observations and recommendations given by the Auditor General, about a government institution, to question officials from the relevant institutions, the anti-corruption body said.

But ACF said that on Monday (24) UNP members of the COPE questioned the Auditor General making it obvious that the Government was carrying out a systematic campaign to cover up the biggest financial irregularity which occurred under the current administration.

“This is not what the people want or expected. I think it’s universally accepted, apart from a few UNPers, that there had been irregularities at the Treasury bond auctions in 2015 and 2016. People also know that former Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran and the monetary board are responsible for what transpired. If the current COPE is divided along party lines and fails to do its job, I think we have to place our hopes on a presidential inquiry,” said the Advisor for the Anti-Corruption Front, Rajith Keerthi Tennakoon.

No shortage of lottery tickets

No shortage of lottery tickets

Oct 27, 2016

The media reported recently about a shortage of the National Lotteries Board’s lottery tickets Govi Setha, Supiri Vasana, Jathika Sampath and Vasana Sampatha. The reason cited was that the contract for printing the lottery tickets had expired and the tender procedure was yet to be finalized to select a new supplier.

When contacted, NLB chairperson Sharmila Perera said there was shortage of lottery tickets. The new suppliers have been selected following the tender procedure and they have started printing the lottery tickets, she said. The NLB lottery tickets are readily available, including those for the draw on the coming 31st. The rumour of a shortage was spread by the previous supplier who has now lost the contract, according to her.
Winning a lottery is a dream of many and hundreds of thousands of lotteries are issued a week. It has also become a livelihood for thousands, including NLB employees as well as the lottery ticket sellers on the streets.

Finance minister, shame on you ! Sunday Leader and Irudhina staff cheated -2 months salaries not paid by Ravi and Arjun Aloysius !


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -27.Oct.2016, 7.00PM) The entire staff of ‘Sunday leader’ and ‘Irudhina’ newspapers belonging to Ravi Karunanayake the Finance minister and notorious Arjun Aloysius who is facing criminal charges of committing a fraud against the State , have not been paid their monthly salaries for the last two months ! 
The staff who are in  dire straits and distress made a complaint to the Editor of Lanka e News.
The details are as follows :
This is in connection with the dire straits the entire staff of ‘Sunday Leader’ and ‘Irudhina’ have been driven into owing to the non payment of salaries…
The staff in its entirety of Leader group of companies Pvt. Ltd. which is run directly under the monitoring and financial support of  the Finance minister Ravi Karunanayake and Arjun Aloysius , the son in law of ex Governor of Central bank, Arjun Mahendran have not been paid their monthly salaries for the last two months.

It is Ruwan Gallage who is the operations manager of the Institution and functions  as a  representative of Ravi Karunanayake, and it is Mahesh Senanayake a popular announcer and journalist who is the representative of Arjun Aloysius , and functions as the General Manager of the Institution. In addition , Akbar a close relative of Mela , wife of Ravi Karunanayake  holds the  post of Director.
The issues pertaining to the salaries ,non payment  of EPF , ETF contributions and other employment entitlements were intimated to Finance minister Ravi Karunanayake and Arjun Aloysius the son in law of ex governor Central bank , who are  the investors in the newspapers through the representatives hereinbefore mentioned .Grave charges of financial misappropriation  had also been mounted against Najith De Alwis the accountant . Yet the administrators had so far taken no transparent  action against him.
The employees in order  to demonstrate their protests against the investors and the administrators over the gross violation of their rights , have decided not to work for the Sunday Leader and Irudhina this week  and  boycott work.
The staff including journalists employed at Leader group of companies Pvt. Ltd., have further decided to disseminate the news of the violation of their fundamental rights  including their salary payments through  the media,  and also take legal measures .
-The members of staff including  the Editorial Board of ‘Sunday Leader’ and ‘Irudhina’ of Leader Group of Companies (Pvt.) Ltd.- 


---------------------------
by     (2016-10-27 14:11:00)

62 students in hospital

2016-10-27

Sixty two students from Grades 6, 7 and 8 of the Bandaranayake Maha Vidyalaya at Hettimulla in Kegalle, were admitted to the Kegalle Hospital today as a result of a sudden respiratory ailment.
The Police and the Medical Officer of Health in the area have launched separate investigations into the incident.  (Saliya Gamasinghe Arachchi)

Israel lobby lawsuits aim to slow boycott in Spain


Charlotte Silver-27 October 2016

In July 2014, at the height of Israel’s bombardment of Gaza, Spain’s RESCOP launched a national campaign targeting local cultural institutions, businesses and associations, asking that they declare themselves “free of Israeli apartheid.”

That effort has since grown, in both size and kind. Today, there are more than 50 participating cities and towns across the country.

And it has sparked a reaction. RESCOP, which sought to build from scratch a popular embrace of the global boycott, divestment and sanctions movement (BDS), is now facing stiff opposition from ACOM (Action and Communication), a pro-Israel advocacy group that has benefited from the Israeli government’s recent attempt at countering the growing BDS movement.
It all started innocuously enough.

“In Gijón,” the largest city in Spain’s Asturias region, “we were eating in restaurants, and drinking in pubs that had the Israeli apartheid-free logos,” Maren Mantovani, from the Stop the Wall campaign, told The Electronic Intifada.

Such nascent successes were soon boosted by other efforts.

In December 2014, another campaign with the similar, but more ambitious idea to ask municipalities to declare their entire cities “Free of Israeli apartheid” arose. The call was set forth in the “Olive Declaration,” drawn up by various groups and city representatives at a conference co-organized by a United Nations body in Seville, the capital of Andalusia.

Over the following year, activists from RESCOP and local BDS groups worked with nearly three dozen towns and cities, helping them draft motions that directed city institutions to avoid contracting services or purchasing products that were involved in violations of international and human rights law in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Cities also committed to adding the Israeli apartheid-free logos to their websites.

Enter ACOM

Today, approximately 50 cities and towns have declared themselves “free of Israeli apartheid.” The latest to join the movement is Cádiz, Andalusia. Cádiz, with more than 120,000 residents, is one of the largest cities to support the campaign. Most municipalities involved are small, rural villages across the countryside, according to activists with RESCOP.

After a year of building momentum, however, the movement ran up against ACOM.

ACOM is an Israel advocacy group in Spain that became active as the BDS campaign was taking off in the country and as Israel dedicated $25 million to an anti-BDS taskforce. Though ACOM claims to have existed since 2009, the earliest identifiable English-language reporting of its work online is from the fall 2014, when the group lobbied Spain’s congress not to recognize Palestinian statehood that is not a result of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.

For the last year ACOM seems to have focused exclusively on beating back city resolutions to be “free of Israeli apartheid.”

On 9 February 2016, a year and a half after the anti-apartheid campaign launched, ACOM filed a lawsuit against Langreo, a city that adopted an anti-apartheid resolution only days earlier, on 28 January. Since then, ACOM has been sending intimidating letters to cities that have adopted such resolutions, 
threatening litigation if they do not cancel their own motion. Some cities, like Rivas Vaciamadrid in the Madrid metropolitan area, report being sued without warning.

The lawsuits claim the city resolutions not only violate the fundamental rights of the Israeli people and all Israeli residents in the territory of Spain, according to a Rivas city representative who requested anonymity, but also assert that the motions are racist and discriminatory toward all of the Jewish community.

The lawsuits also claim the resolutions incite discrimination on the basis of national origins and beliefs, and at least one suit, seen in translation by The Electronic Intifada, portrays the BDS movement as a “foreign power” that is fighting an “imaginary ‘Jewish supremacy.’”

Spinning the narrative

ACOM has portrayed its lawfare campaign in Spain as almost entirely successful: a legal victory against the right to boycott, something Israel advocacy groups have been pursuing across the globe as BDS activism gains ground support.

“The rule of law … has become a cornerstone in the fight to resist the BDS boycott that seeks to criminalize the State of Israel and to discriminate [sic] anybody associated with it,” ACOM chairperson Angel Mas asserted in a press release this summer.

“Quite the opposite to the intentions of the boycott proponents, now legal precedents are being created to associate the BDS movement to illegal anti-Semitic activities that go against international law and human rights,” Mas added.

But contrary to the claims reported in Israel’s English-language media, ACOM has not filed litigation against every single motion, nor has it been consistently successful.

According to records kept by RESCOP, ACOM has filed at least 20 lawsuits. In three cases – including the cities of Langreo, Sant Quirze and Sant Adria – the judges have sided with ACOM, but the other cases have not been clear legal victories. In some instances, cities may have voluntarily withdrawn the motion to avoid a costly lawsuit and in other cases the rulings have been ambiguous or entirely rejected ACOM’s complaint.

In its victory in Langreo, ACOM was described as “having earned the recognition of the Jewish community of Madrid,” and the judge ruled the city’s anti-apartheid motions “incite discrimination.”

But in the case of Gijón, the court threw out ACOM’s complaint, finding the city’s motion was not discriminatory.

And in the case of Rivas Vaciamadrid, the city councilor told The Electronic Intifada, the judge ruled that the motion was constitutional as long as it did not specifically target Israeli trade agreements, and instead more generally forbid trade with all human rights violators.

Fighting back

Rivas is appealing the ruling, according to city officials. An activist told The Electronic Intifada that the campaign has also altered the language of their template so cities don’t encounter the same objections in court.

“We have a great sense of commitment to the safeguarding of the human rights and dignity of all humans around the world,” the representative of Rivas Vaciamadrid told The Electronic Intifada.

“In spite of all the legal limitations, the municipal government of Rivas Vaciamadrid remains convinced that the local government has the obligation, and our citizens expect of us, to participate in the struggle for human rights and a better world for all.”

The city representative said that the resolution had the wide support of the city, and was only opposed by the two right-wing political parties on the city council.

Meanwhile, Langreo is also appealing the court’s ruling, resisting the idea that an Israeli advocacy group can prevent the city from taking a stand against human rights violations.

But other cities have been forced to fold even before a court can rule.

At least five cities have withdrawn their motions after receiving threatening letters from ACOM, according to RESCOP’s data. Ana Sanchez Mera, a member of RESCOP based in Madrid, said these are small villages that cannot afford to defend the resolution in court.

ACOM wants to claim these as wins for its side, but Sanchez Mera stressed that there are no rulings in these cases; the cities simply don’t have the resources to fight ACOM in court.

Little public information on ACOM is available. Their website is in English and Spanish but has little to say about who they are, instead stating vaguely that they represent a network of “activists and supporters” in Spain.

Scant popular support for ACOM

According to the cities and towns visited by ACOM, however, it is an organization made up of just a few men. Angel Mas is the chairman and Ignacio Wenley Palacios is the head lawyer.

When ACOM sues a city, the organization is not joined by residents of that city or other Spanish citizens, according to those who have spoken to The Electronic Intifada. Even though the Spanish court has recognized ACOM as representing the interests of Israel and the Jewish community in Madrid, it is often just Mas or Palacios who shows up to argue in court against a town’s resolution.

RESCOP’s Sanchez Mera admits this has been a setback for the campaign, but not in the way that ACOM has presented it to the media. To The Jerusalem Post, ACOM brags that it’s stacking up the judicial victories. For Sanchez Mera, the litigation ties up RESCOP’s time and energy, but has also helped galvanize commitment among grassroots activists.

“It’s clear what the interests of ACOM are: they are protecting Israel’s interests while BDS is trying to protect human rights,” Sanchez Mera said. “I think it is good that this is exploding. I think this is making the movement stronger. We have better motions now. We have more support.”

In Europe, France is the model pro-Israel advocates hope other countries follow. Even before the launch of the global BDS movement by Palestinian civil society in 2005, France passed an anti-boycott law that has since been applied to BDS, saying boycotts against nations are illegal forms of discrimination against countries and their citizens.

Outlawing dissent

The UK is reportedly mulling similar legislation, though governments in Ireland, Sweden and the Netherlands have affirmed the right to boycott.

American states are also working out where they fall on the right to boycott, with some states going so far as to create blacklists of companies that have ended contracts with Israel following boycott campaigns.

In Spain, where regional autonomy and public participation are prized, the courts have not taken a clear side. But there has been a general warming at the higher levels of politics in Spain towards Israel.

At the beginning of this year, the Spanish government compensated Ariel University, located in a West Bank settlement, more than $100,000 per the recommendation of the Council of State, for excluding Ariel from participating in a scientific competition in 2010.

The Council of State is considered the government’s most important consultative body and is composed mostly of former politicians who are appointed by the government.

The body found the government violated European laws against discrimination based on nationality or place of origin.

But RESCOP and the scores of local BDS groups across Spain still working with their governments are not deterred.

“The Israeli Apartheid Free Zones campaign across the Spanish state is inspiring similar efforts in other countries,” Riya Hassan, the European coordinator for the BDS National Committee, said in a recent press release.

“At a time of a growing democratic deficit across the European continent, it is empowering to witness how citizens are integrating solidarity with Palestinians with domestic agendas that promote social, economic and environmental justice.”

Charlotte Silver is associate editor of The Electronic Intifada.

Delhi Police Arrests Pakistan High Commission Staffer For Espionage, Abdul Basit Summoned by MEA

Delhi Police Arrests Pakistan High Commission Staffer For Espionage, Abdul Basit Summoned by MEA(clockwise) The main gate of the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi, the staffer who was arrested for espionage and the two Indians who assisted him (Picture courtesy: CNN-News18)

October 27, 2016,

New Delhi: Delhi Police has arrested a Pakistan national working at the country's High Commission in the national capital on charges of espionage, a move that is sure to set off a series of tit-for-tat arrests straining further the troubled relationship between the two countries.

However, he was let off after interrogation within hours owing to his diplomatic immunity and has been told to return to Pakistan immediately.

Addressing the media on Thursday post the arrest, Delhi Police said that Mehmood Akhtar was under watch for almost six months now and was held with classified documents and maps related to Indian Army's defence positions.

Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has summoned Pakistan's High Commissioner to India Abdul Basit with regard to the incident.
The Crime Branch has also arrested two persons who are Indians, for allegedly passing on sensitive information to the Pakistani spy agency ISI.
"The two Indians are residents of Rajasthan working for Pakistan's ISI. The spies were in touch with the staff here at Pakistan High Commission and were providing sensitive information and have been identified as Maulana Ramzan and Subhash Jangir," Delhi Police officer Ravindra Yadav told the media.

"This module has been operating from the past 1.5 yrs. We have got input that they were working as a spys for the Pakistanis and they have been sharing documents with people in Pakistan. They were purposely placed in the visa section of the commission and would lure people into committing the espionage on behalf of Pakistan. They were also paid for their deed. Another spy identified as Shoaib will be arrested soon for his involvement," Yadav added.

Sources claim that the Central government was initially reluctant to give a go ahead for Akhtar's arrest. The arrested staffer had been in touch with his local contacts for months to get sensitive information on defence and other issues.

In the past, such incidents have set off a series of retaliatory incidents with Pakistani sleuths on occasions even manhandling Indian staffers at the High Commission in Islamabad.

In November 2015, a spy ring associated with the Pakistan intelligence was busted and the police arrested at least five persons in connection with the case.
(With inputs from PTI)