Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, October 22, 2016

Afghan Taliban envoys in Pakistan to discuss possible peace talks - official

Afghan policemen keep watch during a battle with the Taliban in Nahr-e Saraj district of Helmand province, Afghanistan May 11, 2016. REUTERS/Abdul Malik/Files
Afghan policemen keep watch during a battle with the Taliban in Nahr-e Saraj district of Helmand province, Afghanistan May 11, 2016.REUTERS/Abdul Malik/Files

By Jibran Ahmad- Sat Oct 22, 2016

A delegation from the Taliban's political office visited Pakistan over the weekend, senior officials said on Saturday, for discussions that could include the latest informal effort to restart talks to end Afghanistan's long war.

The visit comes days after Taliban sources said they had held informal meetings with Afghan and U.S. officials in Qatar, the first direct meetings in more than a year after a fledgling process to halt the 15-year-old conflict collapsed.

Taliban sources said Mullah Abdul Manan - brother of the late Taliban founder Mullah Omar - met with U.S. and Afghan officials but there was no breakthrough toward restarting formal talks.

The Taliban delegation will brief Pakistani secuirty agencies on the Qatar meetings - which did not include Pakistani respresentatives - and complain about the recent arrests of some of its senior commanders in Pakistan, a senior member based in Doha said.

Political office representatives Shahabuddin Dilawar, Jan Mohammad and Abdul Salam Hanafi travelled from Qatar and some other joined them in Pakistan, the official said.

Another Taliban member based in Afghanistan said the delegation had held one round of talks and would stay for few more days.

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid confirmed a delegation was visiting Pakistan but would not comment on the Qatar talks, which he has denied took place.

"The delegation was sent to discuss some major issues with Pakistani leadership including the arrests of Afghan refugees and their repatriation to Afghanistan," Mujahid said.

Pakistan's Foreign Ministry spokesman said he had no information about any Taliban visit.

The Doha-based Taliban official said Pakistan was taken into confidence about the Qatar meetings, but they now believe Pakistan recently arrested some senior Taliban commanders to senior commanders to show their displeasure at being left out.

Another Taliban member said a few days ago Pakistani security agencies had raided a madrassa in Quetta and arrested another Taliban commander, Mullah Abdul Samad Sani.

"We don't know what's going on but this is second time during the past two months that Pakistani authorities raided a madrassa in Quetta to arrest senior Taliban member," the Quetta-based Taliban said.

Pakistan hosted the first and only round of official peace negotiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban insurgents to end a war that kills and maims thousands annually.

A planned second round of talks was called off after news broke that founder Mullah Omar had been dead for more than two years, sending the insurgent leadership into turmoil.

(Writing by Kay Johnson)

Afghan_NA

When the cases of involvement of military officers and soldiers in corruption, drug and weapons smuggling were reported in newspapers, First Vice President General Rashid Dostum warned that any officer and soldier found involved in mismanagement and negligence would face legal action. “We implement the law on all military personnel, no matter who they are,” Dostum said.

by Musa Khan Jalalzai

( October 21, 2016, Islamabad, Sri Lanka Guardian) Afghan security forces are undergoing a serious security crisis. NATO and the US lost thousands of troops, and spent half a trillion dollars to build a strong army, but now they seem unwilling to address the exponentially growing corruption culture in the Afghan armed forces. The army that was nurtured under foreign tutelage is dependent on American and NATO stipendiary, and it now depends on the US army how to use them, where, against whom, and for what purposes. But one thing is clear that the Afghan army has lost the support of civilian population. Civilian causalities rose to a record level as the Taliban retrieved sophisticated weapons from their allies within the army headquarters. Desertion and retention have become a persistent challenge for ANA commanders as thousands of soldiers and officers joined either Taliban or Daesh terrorist groups. The Afghan defence ministry is losing as many as 5,000 soldiers and officers every month in cases of desertion and casualties, while only 3,000 soldiers have been recruited.

In February, the ANA arrested and disarmed 30 cops with alleged Taliban ties, including the police chief of Helmand’s Sangin district. Drug trafficking is another serious challenge where, according to the Russian Narcotics Agency report, almost a third of the ANA officers turned to drug trafficking. Army generals and officers are deeply involved in drug trafficking and kidnapping for ransom. The question of merited appointment yet remains to be addressed as the military headquarters and the interior ministry have done nothing to select or appoint officers on merit or to provide oversight to ensure merited promotions. However, last week, dozens of army officers complained about irregular promotion.

Those who fought against insurgents during the last 15 years are removed from their posts and those who enjoyed a comfortable life in Kabul are promoted to the rank of general. The ambassador of the European Union to Afghanistan expressed his dismay that the number of Afghan army generals exceeded several times than those in Britain, Italy, Germany and France. Spokesman for the Defence Ministry General Dawlat Waziri told the ToloNews that Prime Minister Gul Buddin Hekmatyar, President Burhanuddin Rabbani and President Hamid Karzai promoted hundreds of their political allies to the rank of general. Having sensed the flow of troubled waters, the Afghan president took serious notice of the issue, and warned that anyone who interferes in the selection process would be considered a criminal.

On 11 October 2016, President Ashraf Ghani sternly criticised appointments of unprofessional officers and soldiers within the ranks of the Afghan armed forces. The law on personal affairs of commissioned and non-commissioned ANA officers states that promotion of an officer takes place when there is a vacant post. This way of unmerited promotion created uncontrollable corruption within the force as the military headquarters turned into a wholesale market, fixing the price for promotion of every single officer and soldier. President Ghani once stated that promotions must not be delayed. He also stressed the need to bring about professional reforms within the ANA infrastructure. “The problem we saw in Kunduz, Uruzgan, Helmand and the rest of the country over the past two years shouldn’t mean our officers and soldiers do not have the ability to fight the enemy, but it is because of assigning duties to those who were not professional in their job but assigned to posts without considering skills and qualifications,” Ghani said.

When the cases of involvement of military officers and soldiers in corruption, drug and weapons smuggling were reported in newspapers, First Vice President General Rashid Dostum warned that any officer and soldier found involved in mismanagement and negligence would face legal action. “We implement the law on all military personnel, no matter who they are,” Dostum said. However, newspapers also reported a verbal clash between the police chief and military commander, Abdul Jabbar Kahraman over war management in Helmand.

On 15 October 2016, a number of MPs in the lower house of parliament also warned that the lack of war strategy resulted in the exchange of districts between ANA commanders and Taliban insurgents. “Our political leaders both on higher and lower level failed to manage war against insurgents,” MP Saleh Muhammad said. In view of these misgivings, President Ghani asked ANA commanders to stay committed to the security of their country and stay aloof from politics. In fact, President Ghani has no control over his government machinery, and is helpless to dismantle clandestine links between ministers, parliamentarians and war criminals with terrorist groups in all 34 provinces.

The news of collaboration of police and ANA commanders with Taliban in Helmand, Wardak, Jalalabad, Kunar, Kunduz and Badakhshan provinces recently appeared in Afghan media, which prompted misunderstandings about their war management strategies. Last week, in Helmand, more than 100 soldiers were killed, 33 wounded and the rest joined the Taliban, but the Unity government remained tight-lipped. However, the Russian envoy to Kabul, Alexander Mantytskiy, also expressed concern over the failure of American and NATO mission to ensure security and stability in Afghanistan. The exponentially growing security challenges, internal turmoil, kidnapping, attacks on religious places, universities, sexual abuse, rape and bomb attacks have become common and rampant.

In September 2016, the Pajhwok News reported killing of more than 2,000 people by terrorists across the country in September alone. Now as the case further complicates, the US government received a stark warning that the culture of corruption within the Afghan armed forces may well undermine their efforts to establish a professional army. However, as a result of dysfunctional security and defence sector, war criminals and military commanders plunder natural resources across the country. The Integrity Watch Afghanistan in its July 2016 report warned: “Afghanistan loses USD 100 million from illegal mining and USD 1 billion from uncollected customs revenues annually, in part due to a combination of corruption, an associated sense of impunity and lack of professionalism. In addition, corruption has made the armed forces inefficient and difficult to sustain… More importantly, corruption in the armed forces has undermined the legitimacy of the state.”

The matrix of the Islamic State is expanding towards the northern parts of the country. Terrorist groups are pledging allegiance to Daesh’s struggle to establish their units in the Jalalabad province. In an exclusive interview with Pajhwok Afghan News Agency, NATO spokesman Brigadier General Charlie Cleveland confirmed the existence of more than 1,000 Daesh fighters in the Jalalabad province. On 19 April 2016, Russian diplomat, Zamir Kabulov warned that more than 10,000 trained terrorists of the Islamic State were preparing to enter Central Asia. Last week, Abdul Rashid Dostum expressed the same concern and warned that some internal (government) and foreign circles want to transport more than 7,500 Daesh fighters (Chechen, Uzbeks, Tajiks, Iraqi, Syrians, Lebanese, and Libyans) to parts of Northern provinces.

The writer is author of “Fixing the EU Intelligence Crisis” can be reached at zai.musakhan222@gmail.com

Britain Is Becoming an Emerging Market

With a plunging pound and deep economic uncertainty, one of Europe’s most robust markets is now looking a lot like the developing world.
Britain Is Becoming an Emerging Market

BY PEDRO NICOLACI DA COSTA-OCTOBER 17, 2016
Breaking up is hard to do — especially after a 43-year marriage. Which is why the notion that the United Kingdom might engineer a “soft Brexit” from the European Union, the innocent hope of many investors and some Brits, was always a delusion. Instead, Britain’s plunging pound, which has swooned to a staggering 168-year low against a benchmark of other major currencies, is just a taste of the economic deterioration to come.

Instead of the pro-Brexit camp’s promise that the vote was a push for independence from European red tape, the drive for sovereignty has turned into a quixotic exercise in isolationism that shows few signs of ending well. In effect, the United Kingdom has abdicated its chief source of economic and political clout — its close association with the European Union, the world’s largest economy.In so doing,Britain may be on the way to looking more like an emerging market, where suddenly political risk, currency volatility, and uncertainty about the future are the new normal. And if you’re thinking that long-term investment and private spending might suffer as a result, you’re bloody well right.

Despite a raft of warnings, Brexiteers were quick to claim victory in the months following the momentous June referendum. “To me, Brexit is easy,” said a confident Nigel Farage, leader of the pro-Brexit UK Independence Party. Sure, the pound was falling a tad rapidly. But, hey, the economic data didn’t fall off a cliff, and the stock market even hit a new record. But that was the summer sun talking.

The arrival of autumn has brought the onset of reality. One leaked government report estimated the mere cost of the process at an eye-popping $22 billion. That’s substantially more than the U.K.’s yearly contribution to the EU budget, which was supposed to be a source of savings post-Brexit.

Meanwhile, it’s become clear that the stock market’s surge mostly reflected the pound’s depreciation. The reason late-summer markets had not started to fully price in a Brexit is that the new U.K. government, under conservative Prime Minister Theresa May, simply had decided to hold off on actually pulling the Brexit trigger by not invoking Article 50, the terms of the breakup. In other words, the first few months were like a period of separation when the divorce paperwork had yet to be filed.

Now that notice has arrived, things look a lot bleaker. The pound’s decline has started to look anything but orderly, with daily plunges compounded by a surprise “flash crash” that obliterated the currency momentarily but left a lasting scent of panic. This is quite typical of an emerging market, where currency swings tend to be much greater than in rich countries, in part because of the uncertainty generated by fractious, dysfunctional political systems. Worse yet, bond prices have been falling in the currency’s wake, pushing up expectations of inflation for all the wrong reasons — not because Brits expect the economy to boom and their wages to rise but rather because they expect a currency-driven loss of purchasing power. While it’s impossible to predict the pace at which Britain’s economic malaise and increasing isolation will progress — much still hinges on negotiations to come — it is feasible to determine the avenues through which the steady, gradual decay in British living standards is likely to take place.

First and most obviously, there’s the xenophobia underlying the push for a Brexit. The Conservative government’s anti-immigrant propaganda has surpassed the fears of many, most outrageously when it declared that companies should start publicly listing their foreign workers — a policy with dangerous echoes of nationalist totalitarianism. This is already putting a chill on economic activity and the sort of vibrancy that makes London and other major U.K. cities attractive cosmopolitan centers. The implications are widespread, affecting everything from potential investment by foreign companies, applications to British universities by top-tier foreign students, EU-wide funding for the arts and sciences — the list goes on and on.

This dissolution of the social fabric is compounded by a second major setback: Britain’s trade relations with the world.In one fell swoop, long-lasting relationships have been undermined and thrown into disarray. Some early enthusiasm about potential bilateral trade deals has been dampened by the fact that non-EU countries want Britain’s continental relationship to be fully settled before entering into any new negotiations. For four decades, Britain’s trade relations were conducted with the EU as a whole, so it’s impossible to disentangle the two until the U.K. has its own new rules of the road. Indeed, there’s so much uncertainty that the British government has had to go on a hiring spree for trade experts. I’m not sure that’s exactly what the Brexiteers had in mind when they said that leaving the EU would be good for employment figures.

Then there’s the tumbling pound itself. The historically weak pound leaves the Bank of England in a very tight spot, since any effort to further cutalready low interest rates would risk compounding the sell-off in sterling. Normally, a falling currency is a boon to manufacturing and exports, and, indeed, it may have a narrow short-term positive effect for the British economy. But given the waning strength of the country’s industrial sector, such a bump is likely to be marginal — and overwhelmed by the opposing, negative impact. Bank of England Gov. Mark Carney, whose low-rate policies have been directly challenged by the May government, has said he would tolerate somewhat higher inflation for a time. But that is likely to become an unpopular strategy if inflation truly takes off.

And how can we forget Britain’s crowning jewel — its prized financial center? The so-called City of London, for all of its troubles and role in the financial crisis, is a major employer and driver of business activity both for the capital and the nation. Over the last four decades, the U.K.’s banking system has surged in size, with total assets climbing from about 100 percent of the country’s gross domestic product to a staggering 450 percent of GDP — too-big-to-fail on steroids. The large presence of banks in the economy has always been a major boost to other industries, including commercial and residential real estate, hotels, restaurants, and airlines. Some of that may be about to slip away as banks and other financial companies, including younger technology companies, rethink their British operations and investment. These are not empty threats. The benefits of having a London base came precisely from the free movement of people throughout the European Union. With that gone, and with it access to the European Single Market, the advantages begin to quickly evaporate. Cities like Paris; Frankfurt, Germany; and Dublin start to look competitive as potential alternatives.

Lastly, Brexit has thrown the very territorial integrity of the United Kingdom into question. Scotland is overwhelmingly pro-EU, and the threat of another independence referendum looms. This only further ratchets up frightening levels of uncertainty, which nearly 90 percent of U.K. chief financial officers rank as abnormally high post-Brexit. There’s even the question of what might happen to Northern Ireland.
“Robbed of EU financial support, with London less able to commit scarce fiscal funds to Northern Ireland, facing a land border once again with the rest of Ireland … a centrist majority for reunification on economic grounds might materialize,” argues Jacob Kirkegaard, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. “Catholic and Unionist voters who care about the Northern Irish economy may in time choose the perceived economic stability of a united Ireland over remaining in the U.K.” How’s that for renewed sovereignty?

Most strikingly, the May government has actively chosen to alienate any initial attempts at European goodwill, already hard to come by, even though it has very little negotiating power under the circumstances. The pro-Brexit camp clearly advanced toward its cause without a plan and continues to fumble in developing one. It’s no wonder traders see an even steeper decline in the pound ahead, with a potential spike in inflation in its wake as import prices surge.

Sound familiar? It’s the sort of concern economists long reserved for the developing world.

Photo credit: ADRIAN DENNIS/AFP/Getty Images

Omar and Gharam are engaged to be married. (Family photo via Masrawy)

Omar and Gharam are engaged to be married. (Family photo via Masrawy)

 October 22 at 5:00 AM

CAIRO – While celebrating his eldest son's lavish wedding, at which a number of famous singers and belly dancers performed, Nasser Hassan decided to "double the joy," he later recalled.

He announced that his son Omar would marry his cousin Gharam.

At the wedding, held in a province about 75 miles north of Cairo, the guests didn’t find it strange. Some would later tell Egypt’s Al Watan newspaper that there was “nothing inappropriate,” adding that it was only “an engagement, not a marriage".

Omar is 12 years old. His fiancee, Gharam, is 11.

Egyptian laws prohibit official registration for marriages for anyone under the age of 18. But the practice remains prevalent. According to UNICEF, 17 percent of Egyptian girls are married before the age of 18, the vast majority of the unions taking place in rural areas.

But in the case of Omar and Gharam, their engagement sparked outrage, particularly among child and women’s rights activists. The photos of the young couple – Omar in a blue suit, heavily made-up Gharam in a white dress, high heels, and wearing a tiara – splashed across newspapers in the country and heightened the anger.

That prompted Reda Eldanbouki, the head of the Women's Center for Legal Aid and Counseling, to report the incident to the National Center for Childhood and Motherhood, a government agency. He also filed a complaint with the attorney general to investigate the incident and hold the parents accountable for this "crime," he said in a statement.

The engagement of Omar and Gharam “will only lead to an early marriage in which the girl will be deprived of equal chances to education, growth, and will isolate her from social spheres,” he said.

But if history is any indication, it’s unlikely the complaints will stop Egypt’s child marriages, a practice that is also prevalent in many nations in the Middle East, Asia and in Sub-Saharan Africa. Dar al-Ifta, Egypt’s highest Islamic authority, has repeatedly urged state institutions to make concerted efforts to stop marriages among minors.

But that has either had little effect in many areas or has spawned efforts to manipulate the law. In Egypt’s rural areas, families marry off their children but usually delay the official registration of the marriage until the couples reach the lawful age of matrimony to avoid legal punishment. As a consequence, any children born of the marriage will not be issued birth certificates or be recognized until then, legal experts say.

Omar’s father, faced with the backlash of his decision, told local newspapers that he "is a free man and did nothing wrong."

He defended the engagement, saying that "Omar has always loved Gharam so much that he used to say he will marry her when they grow up.” He added that both children acted “beyond their years” and developed “strong feelings for each other” through Facebook and other social media and “wanted to get engaged.”
That’s why, Omar’s father said, he decided to announce their engagement now "before any other man asks for her hand in marriage when she is older".

"They will get married when they reach the legal age," he insisted.

This wasn’t the first child marriage in the province this year. In June, a 10-year-old bride in a pink dress sat next to her 12-year-old groom, celebrating their wedding. The National Center for Motherhood and Childhood deemed the marriage "an assassination of childhood."

Omar’s father said his decision was meant to shield Omar and Gharam. “We have to protect them in their early years before they reach the age of deviation,” he told local newspapers.

Schizophrenia ‘not a mental disorder’, Pakistan’s Supreme Court rules

A computerized image of a schizophrenic brain. Image via Wikimedia Commons.
SCHIZOPHRENIA is not a mental disorder, a Pakistan top court ruled this week, paving the way for the execution of a mentally ill man convicted of murder.

  

According to Reuters, the court said although the 50-year-old Imdad Ali was diagnosed in 2012 as a paranoid schizophrenic, the condition did not fall within the legal definition of mental disorders.

In the decision by the three-judge bench of Pakistan’s supreme court led by Chief Justice Anwer Zaheer Jamali, the ruling said the condition was “not a permanent mental disorder”.

“It is, therefore, a recoverable disease, which, in all the cases, does not fall within the definition of ‘mental disorder’,” the judges were quoted as saying in Thursday’s verdict.

The court based the verdict on two dictionary terms for ‘schizophrenia’, and cited a Supreme Court judgement made in neighbouring India in 1988.


As a result of the ruling, Imdad could be sent to the gallows as early as next week on charges of murdering a cleric in 2001.

His lawyers, however, insist he is unfit to be executed as he is unable to understand his crime and punishment, and that doing so would violate Pakistan’s obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, a United Nations treaty.

The term schizophrenia has been defined as “a serious mental illness characterised by incoherent or illogical thoughts, bizarre behavior and speech, and delusions or hallucinations, such as hearing voices,” according to the The American Psychological Association.

Imdad was certified as having the condition in 2012. A government psychiatrist, Dr Tahir Feroze, who has treated Imdad for the last eight years with two other doctors said he suffers from delusions that he controls the world, is persecuted and was commanded by voices in his head, symptoms that Imdad’s wife Safia Bano says that her husband faced.

“He is completely delusional,” Safia said.

Imdad’s lawyer said the court had dismissed the medical records and a affidavit from his doctor, adding the government report confirming the man’s condition was not presented to court before this year.

Maya Foa, director of a British-based rights group called Reprieve said the verdict was “outrageous”.

“It is outrageous for Pakistan’s Supreme Court to claim that schizophrenia is not a mental illness, and flies in the face of accepted medical knowledge, including Pakistan’s own mental health laws,” Maya said.

Since reintroducing the death penalty in 2014, Pakistan has executed 425 people. The reintroduction of the death penalty was prompted by the mass killing of more than 150 schoolchildren at a Penshawar school by Taliban gunmen.


Imdad’s wife said she would seek forgiveness from the family of the murder victim in a last ditch attempt at allowing her husband to be spared execution that could take place as early as Wednesday.

Under Islamic law, the victim’s family’s forgiveness may reverse the decision to execute a convicted murderer.

“We have contacted some people who are close to his family,” she said. “But they have so far refused to meet us.”

Warning: Very Hot Drinks May Cause Cancer

With pumpkin spice latte season in full swing, here's how to safely consume your favorite hot beverages.

the young woman burned her tongue of hot tea
Photo Credit: Vladimir Gjorgiev/Shutterstock
Home
By Lorraine Chow / October 18, 2016
Remember when McDonald’s lost a lawsuit over a customer accidentally scalding herself with too-hot coffee? The temperature of that spilled coffee was between 180 to 190 degreesFahrenheit, causing third-degree burns that required skin grafts for the customer’s inner thighs. Besides a burnt tongue or lap, there’s another reason why very hot drinks might be harmful to your health.
While official serving recommendations for tea, hot chocolate and coffee is between 160-185 degrees, you’ll probably want to wait a few moments to let these liquids cool before sipping. Turns out, drinking hot beverages above 149 degrees might cause cancer.
Back in June, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published a study in the Lancet Oncologyclassifying “very hot beverages”—149 degrees or above—under Group 2A, meaning that such drinks are "probably carcinogenic to humans," after reviewing data suggesting a link to esophageal cancer.
Rudolf Kaaks, an epidemiologist at the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg told Science that the link is plausible. Kaaks, who previously worked for IARC, explained that scalding hot water can cause inflammation, which is known to increase cancer.
As it happens, 149 degrees Fahrenheit is probably hotter than any coffee, tea or hot chocolate you might consume in the U.S. Home-brewed coffee is usually served around 140 degrees, and when I asked my local Starbucks barista, she said their coffee is exactly 135 degrees.
But in places such as China, Iran, Turkey and South America, tea or maté (a traditional, caffeine-rich South American drink made by steeping dried leaves of the yerba maté plant) is traditionally consumed around 149 degrees or hotter.
“Maté is not only prepared very hot, but drunk through a metal straw that delivers it directly into the throat,” IARC’s Dr. Dana Loomis told the Guardian. (I can also confirm that as a Chinese person, my family has sent back tongue-burning teas and soups at restaurants for being too tepid.)
“It appears that there is thermal injury from exposure to hot liquids that is capable of leading to cancer of the esophagus,” Loomis added.
IARC director Christopher Wild explained that while smoking and alcohol drinking are major causes of esophageal cancer particularly in many high-income countries, “the majority of esophageal cancers occur in parts of Asia, South America and East Africa, where regularly drinking very hot beverages is common and where the reasons for the high incidence of this cancer are not as well understood.”
Hot drinks now belong in the same 2A cancer group as red meat, high-temperature frying and various chemicals.
The same IARC study also determined that drinking coffee itself was not classifiable as carcinogenic to humans, a reverse of the organization’s 1991 decision. So coffee lovers need not worry—just avoid drinking your morning cuppa’ joe above 149 degrees.
"These results suggest that drinking very hot beverages is one probable cause of esophageal cancer and that it is the temperature, rather than the drinks themselves, that appears to be responsible,” Wild said.
We doubt you’ll bust out a thermometer for each cup, but if you’re consuming hot drinks at home or in a restaurant, the rule is that a drink is safe “basically, when your tongue says it is” for coffee, and “when you can hold the cup in your hand without being burned” for tea.

Porn star Jessica Drake is 11th woman to allege Donald Trump sexual misconduct


 Jessica Drake speaks beside attorney Gloria Allred about allegations of sexual misconduct against Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump. Photograph: Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images

 in New York and  in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania-

Sunday 23 October 2016

An 11th woman came forward to accuse Donald Trump of inappropriate sexual behavior on Saturday.

Jessica Drake, 42, a porn star and sex educator, said in a statement that during a golf tournament in Lake Tahoe “10 years ago”, the Republican presidential nominee “grabbed” her and two other unnamed women tightly and kissed them on the lips “without asking permission”.

He then offered Drake $10,000 and the use of his private plane, she said, if she would agree to come back to his room and accompany him to a party.

 A picture handed out by the lawyer Gloria Allred, said to show Donald Trump with Jessica Drake. Photograph: Gloria Allred

The Trump campaign did not immediately comment on the new allegation, which was made by Drake at a press conference held by the lawyer Gloria Allred, who has previously introduced two Trump accusers to the public.

Eleven women have now accused the Republican presidential nominee of sexual assault or inappropriate sexual behaviour since the leak two weeks ago of a 2005 Access Hollywood recording, in which Trump oasted of attempting to “fuck” a married woman and being able to “grab” women “by the pussy” without their consent.

Trump apologised for the recorded remarks, which he said were “locker-room talk” and did not describe actual behaviour. He has since denied all accusations. His poll numbers have suffered amid the controversy and he currently trails Hillary Clinton by about six points nationally, according to realclearpolitics.com.

On Saturday, while delivering a policy speech in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, before a short tour of the civil war battlefield, Trump said he would sue each accuser.

“Every woman lied when they came forward to hurt my campaign,” he said. “Total fabrication. The events never happened. All of these liars will be sued after the election is over.”

In her own statement issued on Saturday, Allred said: “Mr Trump, this morning you spoke at Gettysburg where many brave patriots fought and died. You have dishonoured their sacrifice by threatening wives, mothers and daughters who have made accusations against you.”

Responding to Allred’s role in the naming of the 10th accuser, Karena Virginia, on Thursday, the Trump campaign said in a statement “discredited political operative Gloria Allred, in another coordinated, publicity-seeking attack with the Clinton campaign, will stop at nothing to smear Mr Trump”.

The first accuser introduced by Allred was Summer Zervos, a contestant on Trump’s reality TV hit, The Apprentice. The ninth accuser, Cathy Heller, told her story to the Guardian last week.

In Gettysburg on Saturday, Trump said “it was probably the [Democratic National Committee] and the Clinton campaign that put forward these liars with these fabricated stories”. He added: “We’ll find out at a later date through litigation and I look so forward to it.”

In her statement, which was sent to the press with a picture of her with Trump, Drake said she was working for Wicked Pictures at the Lake Tahoe golf event and accepted an invitation to walk the course with the billionaire.

“During that time,” she said, “he asked me for my phone number, which I gave to him. Later that evening, he invited me to his room. I said I didn’t feel right going alone, so two other women came with me. In the penthouse suite, I met Donald again. When we entered the room he grabbed each of us tightly in a hug and kissed each of us on the lips without asking for permission. He was wearing pyjamas.”

Drake said a bodyguard was present as Trump questioned her about her work in adult films and asked each woman present “whether we were married or single”. Trump married his third wife, Melania Knauss, in 2005.

Drake said that after she left Trump’s suite a man called on Trump’s behalf to ask her to come back to his room and she declined. Trump then called himself and asked her to have dinner with him and to go to a party. When she declined, she said, “Donald then asked me ‘What do you want?’ ‘How much?’”

Drake said she excused herself, whereafter a man called and offered her $10,000.

“I declined again,” she said, “and once more gave as an excuse that I had to return to Los Angeles for work. I was then told that Mr Trump would allow me the use of his private jet to take me home if I accepted his invitation.”

She added: “I did relate my experience immediately afterward to some friends. Out of respect to the other parties involved and their families, I will not share their names.”

According to the movie website IMDB.com, Jessica Drake is the stage name of Angela Patrice Heaslet.

NiUnaMenos: How the brutal gang rape and murder of a schoolgirl united the furious women of Latin America

 The sign reads, "Way home I want to be free not brave".  CREDIT:  EDGARD GARRIDO-Women in Santiago, Chile protest against the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl in Argentina CREDIT: CLAUDIO REYES
The sign reads, "Way home I want to be free not brave". Women in Santiago, Chile protest against the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl in Argentina
Women take to the streets to march against the rape of a teenager in Buenos AiresActivists protest the rape of a teenager in Argentina
Women take to the streets to march against the rape of a teenager in Buenos AiresCREDIT: EPA/MARIO GUZMAN-Activists in El Salvador protest the rape of a teenager in Argentina CREDIT: MARVIN RECINOS
The TelegraphLatin America has a serious problem with violence against women. And according to the UN, it’s getting worse.

This week, tens of thousands of women took to the streets in cities across Argentina, Chile, Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay, Guatemala and Mexico, wearing black and carrying signs emblazoned with the words “Machismo kills” and “Ni Una Menos” (Not One Woman Less)”.

The region-wide protests were in response to the fatal rape of a 16-year-old girl in Mar del Plata, Argentina.

On October 8, Lucia Pérez was kidnapped, drugged and gang rapedwith such violence that she died of internal injuries. Prosecutor María Isabel Sánchez described the horrific assault as “an act of inhuman sexual aggression”.

The attack has caused a wave of fury in a region where 98 per cent of female murders still go unpunished, and where UN Women regional director for the Americas and the Caribbean Luiza Caravalho, has warned that violence against women is on the rise.
Women in Santiago, Chile protest against the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl in Argentina CREDIT: CLAUDIO REYES
Of the 25 countries with the highest rates of murder and violence against women, more than half are in Latin America and the Caribbean, according to the Geneva Convention report of 2011. And some of the country-specific statistics are horrifying.

Mexico’s Edomex state has been declared one of the most dangerous places in the world to be female after 1,200 women were killed in just six years between 2005 and 2011. Their bodies were dumped in canals and on wasteland, and often showed signs of extreme torture. In Honduras, 13.3 women in every 100,000 will be killed due to gender violence. While in Brazil a woman dies at the hands of a known perpetrator every six hours.

Many blame Latin America’s problems with female violence on machismo - a culture of exaggerated masculinity and sexual dominance.

Catcalling in the street, groping and sexual harassment are everyday symptoms of this machista culture, which in its most extreme form can result in women being treated as men’s property, raped and even murdered at the hands of boyfriends or former partners.

In Central America, where gang crime is prevalent, the violence goes one step further still, with the rape and murder of girlfriends, sisters and daughters used as a weapon to punish members.
Women take to the streets to march against the rape of a teenager in Buenos AiresCREDIT: EPA/MARIO GUZMAN
In an attempt to get a grip on the region-wide problem, 16 countries in Latin America have legislated against “femicide” and gender-based violence, handing down longer sentences for hate crimes against women. But Professor Maxine Molyneux, from the UCL Institute of the Americas, says these good intentions don’t go far enough.

“Although there is progress in passing laws on gender-based violence with most countries having - or on the way to having - legislation in place, very few governments have set aside the resources or have taken the necessary policy measures to deal with it effectively – if at all,” she explains.

“Also gender-based violence is rooted in a culture of male sexual prerogative that has never been adequately challenged except by feminists (and by the disappointingly few men who support them).”

The increase in violence towards women in recent years has been attributed to an even darker theory, voiced by Sabrina Cartabia, one of the organisers of the #NiUnaMenos march this week in Argentina.
Activists in El Salvador protest the rape of a teenager in Argentina CREDIT: MARVIN RECINOS
She said: “This violence is trying to teach us a lesson, it wants to put us back in a traditional role into which we don’t fit anymore.”

Brad Epps, Professor of Spanish at the University of Cambridge, agrees. He describes the latest surge in violence against women as the result of long-standing male privilege being thrown into crisis by societal and legislative changes.

“‘When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression. Put a bit differently, old orders tend to go out not with a whimper, but a bang.”

Indeed, the scenes across Latin America are reminiscent of those in India, following the 2012 fatal gang rape of a student on a bus in New Delhi - which sparked widespread demonstrations.

Here, the Ni Una Menos movement shows no sign of slowing down. It seems Latin American women – and some men – have finally decided the old order must change, for the sake of young girls like Lucia Pérez.

As Professor Molyneux explains: “It is a principle duty of democratic states to provide safety for citizens. Too many Latin American countries are failing in that fundamental duty.”