Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, October 10, 2016

Dhanasiri Amaratunga flees fearing CID probe!

Dhanasiri Amaratunga flees fearing CID probe!

Oct 10, 2016

A few days ago, soon after getting to know that the CID has launched investigations into the murder and unlawful income earning charges against him, former Dehiwela-Mt. Lavinia mayor Dhanasiri Amaratunga had fled the country, reports say.

CID investigations have revealed that Amaratunga was directly involved in the killing of two persons in the municipality premises over a meat stall tender at Dehiwela in 2004.
 
Also, he was connected to political murders at Dehiwala and Mt. Lavinia in 2004, 2005 and 2006, it is further revealed. Previously, investigations launched by the CID against him had been covered up after he joined to strengthen the hands of ex-president Mahinda Rajapaksa.
 
With the ‘Yahapaalana’ government taking power, the investigations resumed under the CID. Amaratunga made a big attempt to cover up the investigations through the president or the prime minister. Failing in the attempt, he fled the country, say sources close to him, adding that he had obtained visa a few days previously to go to the USA.
 
The CID has uncovered in the investigations that in addition to murders, he had amassed illegal wealth and used the ill-gotten money to buy a luxury palace at Kadawatha Road, Dehiwela and a hotel in a big estate at Hatton-Maskeliya.
 
Await further details about these murders and ill-gotten money soon…..!

CANADIAN PARLIAMENT ADOPTS TAMIL HERITAGE MONTH

Unanimous support for M-24 Tamil Heritage Month
Canadian Parliament Adopts Tamil Heritage Month
Motion M-24 is adopted by the House of Commons in historic vote
For Immediate Release
October 5, 2016
Ottawa, Ontario — The Canadian Parliament passed motion M-24 recognizing January of each year as Tamil Heritage Month with all party support. The Private Member’s Motion put forth by Gary Anandasangaree, Member of Parliament for Scarborough-Rouge Park, was debated on May 20th, and September 29th, 2016 and passed today. During both days of the debate, Members of Parliament from all the major political parties spoke in favour of the motion, highlighting the contributions made by the Tamil-Canadian community across Canada.

The motion recognizes “that, in the opinion of the House, the government should recognize the contributions that Tamil-Canadians have made to Canadian society, the richness of the Tamil language and culture, and the importance of educating and reflecting upon Tamil heritage for future generations by declaring January, every year, Tamil Heritage Month.”

“This is a historical milestone that recognizes the incredible contributions of Tamil-Canadians to our society and the richness of the language, heritage and culture from coast to coast to coast” stated Gary Anandasangaree, Member of Parliament for Scarborough-Rouge Park.

Bill Blair, the Liberal MP from Scarborough-Southwest, took the opportunity to highlight the many municipalities such as Mississauga, Durham, Ottawa, Toronto, Markham, Ajax and Pickering – in addition to the Toronto District School Board and Province of Ontario – that have already declared January as Tamil Heritage Month. “This, in no small part, speaks to the invaluable contributions the Tamil community continues to make in virtually every sector of our economy, every field of endeavour.”

Members from the other side of the House were equally supportive and eloquent about the significance of this motion. During his speech, Bob Saroya, Conservative Member of Parliament for Markham-Unionville concluded that this motion “would provide an opportunity to showcase and share the Tamil community’s vibrant culture, traditions, and long-standing history with fellow Canadians.” New Democratic Party Member of Parliament for Vancouver East, Jenny Kwan, said supporting this motion was another step in recognizing “that Canada is strengthened by diversity.”

“Passing this motion crossed partisan lines and is a result of the collective advocacy and contributions of many organizations, community leaders and politicians of all stripes and all levels of government throughout the years. It is a testament to our collective and united effort in achieving this important goal” concluded Gary Anandasangaree.

Festivities to celebrate the inaugural Tamil Heritage Month across Canada will commence in January 2017, which coincides with the Canada 150 celebration.

– 30 –
For more information:
Gowthaman Kurusamy, Executive Assistant, 416-845-4692
———————————————————————————————————————————-
 Le Parlement canadien adopte le Mois du patrimoine tamoul

La motion M-24 est adoptée par la Chambre des communes dans le cadre d’un vote historique
Pour publication immédiate
Le 5 octobre 2016

Ottawa (Ontario) — Le Parlement canadien a adopté la motion M-24 proclamant le mois de janvier de chaque année Mois du patrimoine tamoul avec l’appui de tous les partis.Avant d’être adoptée aujourd’hui, la motion d’initiative parlementaire, déposée par Gary Anandasangaree, député de  Scarborough-Rouge Park, avait fait l’objet de débats le 20 mai et le 29 septembre 2016. Durant ces deux jours, des députés de tous les partis politiques majeurs se sont montrés en faveur de cette motion, soulignant les contributions de la communauté tamoule canadienne partout au Canada.

La motion se lit comme suit : « Que, de l’avis de la Chambre, le gouvernement devrait reconnaître les contributions que les Canadiens d’origine tamoule ont apportées à la société canadienne, la richesse de la langue et de la culture tamoules ainsi que l’importance de sensibiliser la population et de faire honneur au patrimoine tamoul pour les générations à venir en déclarant le mois de janvier, Mois du patrimoine tamoul ».

« C’est une étape historique qui permet de reconnaître les contributions incroyables des Canadiens d’origine tamoule à notre société et la richesse de la langue, du patrimoine et de la culture tamouls d’un océan à l’autre », a déclaré Gary Anandasangaree, député de Scarborough-Rouge Park.
Bill Blair, député libéral de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest, a profité de l’occasion pour souligner que de nombreuses municipalités ont déjà désigné janvier comme le mois du patrimoine tamoul, notamment Mississauga, Durham, Ottawa, Toronto, Markham, Ajax et Pickering, en plus de la Commission scolaire du district de Toronto et la Province de l’Ontario. « Ce geste révèle bien les contributions inestimables que la communauté tamoule continue d’apporter dans presque tous les secteurs de notre économie et tous les domaines d’activités ».

Les députés de l’autre côté de la Chambre étaient tout aussi favorables à la motion et éloquents sur la signification de celle-ci. Le député conservateur de Markham-Unionville, Bob Saroya, a conclu son discours en déclarant que cette motion « fournirait une occasion de présenter et de partager la culture et les traditions vibrantes de la communauté tamoule et son histoire de longue date avec ses concitoyens canadiens ». La députée néo-démocrate de Vancouver-Est,  Jenny Kwan, a déclaré que l’appui de cette motion équivaudrait à reconnaître que le « Canada est renforcé par la diversité ».
« L’adoption de cette motion a permis de surmonter les frontières partisanes et elle est le résultat des activités et des contributions collectives de nombreux organismes, dirigeants communautaires et politiciens de toutes les allégeances et de toutes les échelles de gouvernement depuis plusieurs années. Elle est le testament de notre effort collectif et uni pour atteindre ce but important », a conclu Gary Anandasangaree.
Les festivités entourant le Mois du patrimoine tamoul partout au Canada commenceront en janvier 2017, en même temps que les célébrations du 150e anniversaire du Canada.
– 30 –
Pour plus d’information :
Gowthaman Kurusamy, adjoint administratif, 416-845-4692
———————————————————————————————————————————-
தமிழ் மரபுத் திங்கள் கனேடிய பாராளுமன்றத்தால் அங்கீகரிக்கப்பட்டது
வரலாற்று முக்கியத்துவம் வாய்ந்த வாக்கெடுப்பில் முன்மொழிவு எம்-24 ஏற்றுக்கொள்ளப்பட்டது
உடனடி வெளியீட்டுக்கு
ஒக்டோபர் 5, 2016

ஒட்டாவா, ஒன்றாரியோ – ஒவ்வொரு ஆண்டும் சனவரி மாதத்தை தமிழ் மரபுத் திங்களாக அங்கீகரிக்கும் எம்-24 முன்மொழிவு அனைத்துக் கட்சிகளினதும் ஏகோபித்த ஆதரவுடன் கனேடிய பாராளுமன்றத்தால் ஏற்றுக்கொள்ளப்பட்டது. தனிநபர் முன்மொழிவாக ஸ்காபரோ-ரூஜ் பார்க் தொகுதி பாராளுமன்ற உறுப்பினர் ஹரி ஆனந்தசங்கரியால் முன்வைக்கப்பட்ட இந்த முன்மொழிவு மே 20ம் திகதியும், செப்ரெம்பர் 29ம் திகதியும் பாராளுமன்றத்தில் விவாதிக்கப்பட்டு இன்று ஏற்றுக்கொள்ளப்பட்டது. விவாதம் நடைபெற்ற இரண்டு தினங்களிலும், அனைத்து முக்கிய கட்சிகளையும் சேர்ந்த பாராளுமன்ற உறுப்பினர்கள், கனடாவெங்கும் தமிழ்-கனேடியர்கள் ஆற்றியிருக்கும் பங்களிப்புகளை சுட்டிக்காட்டி, முன்மொழிவுக்கு ஆதரவாக உரையாற்றினர்.

“அரசு ஒவ்வொரு ஆண்டும் சனவரி மாதத்தை தமிழ் மரபுத் திங்கள் என அறிவிப்பதன் மூலம், கனேடிய சமூகத்திற்கு தமிழ்-கனேடியர்கள் ஆற்றியுள்ள பங்களிப்புக்களையும், தமிழ் மொழியினதும் பண்பாட்டினதும் செழுமையையும், தமிழ் மரபுபற்றிய அறிவையும் புரிந்துணர்வையும் எதிர்கால தலைமுறைகளுக்கு ஊட்டவேண்டியதன் முக்கியத்துவத்தையும் அங்கீகரிக்கவேண்டும் என்பது இந்த அவையின் கருத்தாகும்” என எம்-24 முன்மொழிவு தெரிவிக்கிறது.

“தமிழ்-கனேடியர்கள் நாடுதழுவிய வகையில் எமது சமூகத்திற்கு ஆற்றியுள்ள அளப்பரிய பங்களிப்புக்களையும், தமிழ் மொழியினதும், மரபினதும், பண்பாட்டினதும் செழுமையையும் அங்கீகரிக்கும் வரலாற்று மைல்கல் இது” என ஸ்காபரோ-ரூஜ் பார்க் தொகுதி பாராளுமன்ற உறுப்பினர் ஹரி ஆனந்தசங்கரி கூறினார்.

ஸ்காபரோ-தென்மேற்று தொகுதியின் லிபரல் பாராளுமன்ற உறுப்பினரும், நீதித்துறை அமைச்சரின் பாராளுமன்ற செயலருமான பில் பிளாயர் உரையாற்றுகையில் மிசிசாகா, டேர்கம், ஒட்டாவா, தொரன்ரோ, மார்க்கம், ஏஜக்ஸ், பிக்கரிங் உள்ளிட்ட நகரசபைகளும், ஒன்றாரியோ மாநிலமும், தொரன்ரோ கல்விச்சபையும் ஏற்கனவே சனவரி மாதத்தை தமிழ் மரபுத் திங்களாக அங்கீகரித்துள்ளதை சுட்டிக்காட்டினார். “இது எமது பொருளாதாரத்திற்கும், ஏனைய துறைகளிற்கும் தமிழ் சமூகம் தொடர்ந்தும் ஆற்றிவருகின்ற அளப்பரிய பங்களிப்புக்களிற்கு தெளிவான சான்று” என அவர் கூறினார்.

எதிர்க்கட்சி அங்கத்தவர்களும் முன்மொழிவின் முக்கியத்துவத்தை ஆதரித்து சிலாகித்தனர். “தமிழர்களின் உயிர்ப்பான பண்பாட்டையும், மரபுகளையும், நீண்ட வரலாற்றையும் சக கனேடியர்களுக்கு வெளிக்காட்டவும், அவர்களுடன் பகிர்ந்துகொள்ளவும் இந்த முன்மொழிவு வாய்ப்பை ஏற்படுத்திக்கொடுக்கும்” என மார்க்கம்-யூனியன்வில் தொகுதிக்கான கொன்சவேற்றீவ் பாராளுமன்ற உறுப்பினர் பொப் சொரோயா விவாதத்தின்போதான தனது உரையில் தெரிவித்தார். இந்த முன்மொழிவுக்கு ஆதரவவு தெரிவிப்பது “கனடா பல்வகைமையால் பலம் பெறுகிறது” என்பதை ஏற்றுக்கொள்வதை நோக்கி முன்வைக்கப்படும் இன்னொரு அடி என வன்கூவர்-கிழக்கு தொகுதியின் என்.டி.பி. பாராளுமன்ற உறுப்பினர் ஜெனி குவான் முன்மொழிவை ஆதரித்து ஆற்றிய உரையில் குறிப்பிட்டார்.

“இந்த முன்மொழிவு ஏற்றுக்கொள்ளப்பட்டதானது கட்சி எல்லைகளைக் கடந்ததோடு, பல ஆண்டுகளாக பல்வேறு அரச மட்டங்களையும் பல்வேறு அரசியல் சார்புலைகளையும் கொண்ட அரசியல்வாதிகளினதும், சமூகத்தலைவர்களினதும், சமூக அமைப்புகளினதும் ஒருங்கிணைந்த பரிந்துரையாலும் பங்களிப்புகளாலும் எட்டப்பட்ட அடைவாகும். இந்த முக்கியமான அடைவை எட்டுவதறகான எம் அனைவரினதும் ஒருங்கிணைந்த ஒருமுகப்பட்ட முயற்சிக்கு இது சான்று” என ஹரி ஆனந்தசங்கரி தெரிவித்தார்.

முதன்முதலாக கனடா தழுவிய வகையில் பாராளுமன்றத் திடல் உட்பட்ட இடங்களிலே தமிழ் மரபுத் திங்களைக் கொண்டாடும் நிகழ்வுகள் சனவரி 2017ல் ஆரம்பமாகும். இவை கனடாவின் 150ம் ஆண்டு நிறைவையொட்டிய கொண்டாட்டங்களுடன் உடனிகழ்வது குறிப்பிடத்தக்கது.

-30-
மேலதிக விபரங்களுக்கு:

கௌதமன் குருசாமி, நிறைவேற்று உதவியாளர் – 416-845-4692

The struggle for indigenous rights extends to Palestine


“Smyrni” the 2,000 ton Greek motor freighter packed with 1,750 immigrants from Constanza, Romania, is seen 20 miles off the coast of Haifa, Palestine, May 14, 1946. CREDIT: AP Photo/Davidson


Go to the profile of Justin SalhaniJustin Salhani-2016-10-10

Up until quite recently, colonialism was not seen as a bad thing. For at least a few hundred years, colonialism was assumed to benefit native and indigenous peoples. Predominately European colonizers viewed other people as “uncivilized,” and often rationalized colonialism with the idea that they were bestowing civilization upon savages.

It’s through this lens that Americans have celebrated Columbus Day since the 1930s. But with the realization that the Native American people may not have appreciated acts of genocide or ethnic cleansing, Columbus Day is now increasingly being shunned for Indigenous Peoples’ Day.

But the struggle of indigenous activists isn’t limited to the Americas. Much as the Native Americans view Columbus Day, the Palestinian people view the creation of the state of Israel, a day they commemorate on May 15 each year as youm al-Nakba, which means “day of catastrophe” in Arabic.

On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion declared Israel a state. “We hereby proclaim the establishment of the Jewish state in Palestine, to be called Israel,” he said at a reception at the time.

While there has long been a Jewish presence in the area, the origins of modern-day Israel — and Ben-Gurion’s declaration — date back to the Zionist movement established in the late 19th century by persecuted European Jews. In 1896, in response to increasing anti-Semitism and nationalist movements in Europe, Austrian journalist Theodore Herzl wrote a pamphlet arguing that Jews could only avoid anti-Semitism by declaring a Jewish state. Herzl led the first Zionist Congress in Switzerland in 1897, and after briefly considering other areas, the group decided Palestine would be the ideal land for a Jewish state, due to religious ties to the land.

In the late 19th century, many European Jews began immigrating to Palestine, which was first under Ottoman rule and after World War I, under the British Mandate. The 1917 Balfour Declaration announced an intent to establish a Jewish state in Palestine, but indigenous Palestinians largely opposed this establishment. Thus, in an attempt to appease the locals, the British maintained rule over the land and tried to impose limits on immigration from Europe. But facing persecution, and especially during the dark days of the Holocaust, many European Jews continued to arrive in Palestine throughout the mid 20th century.

From December 1947 through 1948, Zionist militias destroyed over 530 Palestinian towns and villages

Estimates put the number of Palestinians who had to flee their homes at 750,000, and their empty homes were often inhabited by Jewish immigrants who fled or survived the Holocaust.
“There is a kind of historic dubious counter-narrative where there is this idea that there was no such thing as the Palestinian people.”
Since the establishment of Israel, there has been an effort to rebrand Palestinians as a created people.
“Clearly, the Arab Palestinians were there for centuries,” Matt Duss, president of the Foundation for Middle East Peace, told ThinkProgress. “There is an historically dubious counter-narrative that claims either that there was no such thing as a Palestinian people, or that they simply came into being in the mid-20th century in response to Zionism. While it is quite true that Palestinian culture was impacted by the conflict and tension with Zionism, I’d say it is true in the other direction as well. Zionist identity and Israeli identity, [has been influenced] by Palestinian culture and nationalism.”

Today, Israeli leaders — often Ashkenazi Jews — attempt to portray themselves as the original inhabitants of Palestine.

“We’re not the British in India. We’re not the Belgians in the Congo,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Congress in 2011. “This is the land of our forefathers, the land of Israel, to which Abraham brought the idea of one God, where David set out to confront Goliath, and where Isaiah saw a vision of eternal peace.”

Netanyahu isn’t incorrect that Judaism has a long history in Palestine. “A lot [of the region’s history] is shared Jewish, Muslim, and Christian history,” said Duss. “Abraham and the patriarchs of the Bible are a great importance to all three monotheistic faiths. Jews lived and developed culture and history in these lands for millenia.”

But Netanyahu’s comments don’t change the fact that indigenous Jews continue to suffer today, even within the borders of Israel. Mizrahi Jews (Jews of Middle Eastern descent) often face strong counts of racism from Ashkenazi Jews (descendants of European Jews).

Equally important, Netanyahu’s comments reveal the evolution of political rhetoric used by Israeli leaders to justify the establishment of a state where an indigenous people have lived for centuries.

“If you look at writings of early Zionists, they have a very different perspective and used colonialism, embraced it, and referred to Palestinians as the native people and indigenous people of the land,” Yousef Munayyer, the executive director of the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, told ThinkProgress. “That was at a time when it wasn’t a dirty word. When it became a dirty word in modern discourse is when they backed away and pretended it wasn’t that.”

Today, Palestinians do not have equal rights to Israelis — whether in Gaza, the Occupied West Bank, or within the borders of modern-day Israel.

“Israel continued in 2015 to enforce severe and discriminatory restrictions on Palestinians’ human rights, and to build unlawful settlements in and facilitate the transfer of Israeli civilians to the occupied West Bank,” Human Rights Watch wrote in its 2016 World Report.

And even the indigenous people who are now citizens of Israel are considered by many to be a threat. 

When Netanyahu ran for reelection last year, he riled up support by warning about the “droves” of Arabs voting in elections.
“It’s hard not to think about the experience of Native Americans and Palestinians as a similar and shared experience given the histories.”
The biggest issue is arguably the distorted power balance that rests heavily with the Israelis over the indigenous Palestinians. “Right now you have a situation where one side has overwhelmingly superior power,” Duss said. “They can change facts on the ground with the building of settlements, expropriation of land, and expulsion of families from homes.”

The settlements are a legacy of the colonialism that still exists in Palestine, and that leaves the indigenous Palestinian people as a subjugated group — whether or not they are within the borders of modern-day Israel.

The United States criticized Israel last week for approving plans for a new settlement in the West Bank. The State Department “strongly condemned” the plan and said it violates Israel’s vow to not build more settlements due to the negative impact such a move has on the peace process.

Though the struggle of the indigenous people of the American continent has lasted centuries longer than that of the Palestinians, some of the parallels are still instructive.

“I think those parallels are real, including this connection of people to the land in a very unique way that differs from colonists,” Munayyer said. “It’s hard not to think about the experience of Native Americans and Palestinians as a similar and shared experience given the histories.”
Plan will allow Jordan to keep its border with refugee camp holding over 75,000 people and dubbed 'IS enclave' by government shut

Plan will allow Jordan to keep its border with refugee camp holding over 75,000 people and dubbed 'IS enclave' by government shut
A Syrian boy at a refugee camp inside Jordan (AFP)

Monday 10 October 2016 
Jordan will deliver aid to tens of thousands of Syrian refugees trapped at its border using a crane, officials have said, allowing it to maintain its policy of keeping its frontier with its war-torn neighbour firmly sealed.
Refugees have been trapped in Ruqban, a sandy ridge on Jordan’s north-eastern border, since Amman decided to shut the border in 2014 – they now number up to 75,000.
Aid supplies to the makeshift camp were cut off this June when Jordanian authorities declared the border area a “military zone” and forbade any vehicles from entering after a car bomb outside the camp killed six soldiers.
Shortly after the decision, aid group Doctors Without Borders (MSF) warned that camp residents – including 30,000 children – were in “desperate need”.
The Jordanian government agreed a one-off aid delivery to the camp in July after rebels saidRussian air strikes had killed three refugees taking shelter in the area.
However, since then authorities have kept the border sealed.
Satellite images obtained by Amnesty International suggested that camp residents have been creating makeshift graveyards as refugees succumb to malnutrition and diseases like hepatitis.
Speaking to the Associated Press on Monday, Jordanian government spokesperson Mohammed Momani said that authorities will allow aid to be delivered to what he described as a “Daesh enclave”, using a common Arabic term for IS.
"The new mechanism will be delivering aid on the berm through cranes, and the aid will be given to community leaders of groups of Syrians so they can distribute it accordingly," Momani said.
However, he stressed that the border will remain firmly closed, saying that the camp has been “infiltrated” by criminals, smugglers and extremists, and citing the possible security risk to Jordan if the frontier is opened.
Jordan shares a 375-kilometre long border with Syria and currently hosts at least 650,000 registered Syrian refugees, amounting to around 10 percent of the entire population.

Will the World Ever Get Rid of War and Conflicts ?

arb_art and war

by N.S.Venkataraman    
                                                     
( October 9, 2016, Chennai, Sri Lanka Guardian) The announcement of Nobel Peace Prize to Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos for his  efforts to end more than five decades of war in Colombia has ,once again  ,brought  to focus the question as to whether the peace activists who are honoured with  Nobel prizes and  several other awards ,have really been successful in bringing visible change for the better  towards  peace and harmony in the world.

Many peace prizes have  been awarded to  people who are eloquent speakers, profound thinkers  and advocates of the cause for peace  such as The Dalai Lama, Barrack Obama and others .   No doubt, these activists have strived in their own way and in their regions to bring an element of harmony and peace or rise in revolt against violence and exploitation.

However, do such peace prizes give hope that the efforts of the peace activists would bring about world peace?

Is the world peace a mirage ?

In spite of the efforts of the peace activists,, world peace appears to remain as a mirage. It appears that the ground reality is  that the world without  war are unlikely to happen in the foreseeable future.

During the first and the second world war and several other wars and conflicts thereafter, millions of  people have suffered injuries, displacement and loss of lives. After the second world war, the world appeared to  have realized  for sometime that the war should be avoided,  which paved the way for the formation of United Nations Organisation. But, nothing really has changed  thereafter and wars and conflicts continue.

 Has UNO experiment failed ?

Secretary General of United Nations  is in an unique position,  where he can really lecture to the world on the need to force peace and stir the world conscience . He can make the voice of United Nations as a rallying point for the world citizens,  who can think beyond borders and  commit themselves to a world that can get rid of war and conflict .

Unfortunately, in the past , the Secretary Generals of UNO have been functioning more like administrators in  bureaucratic style and have not been able to lift the organization to a higher pedestal for world peace.

It appears that the experiment of forming United Nations organisation has really failed , in that UNO has never been able to effectively stop war or resolve any conflict. Obviously, the world has not moved an inch towards peace after the end of the second world war.

Who is responsible for the situation?

The question arises as to who is responsible for such situation?

Today, we find that people of different countries do not  dislike each other and  they readily  interact in business  and cultural exchange activities across the nations, irrespective of any conflict between the nations.

Therefore, it is clear that the wars do not happen because  mass of people want war. On the other hand , people  really do not want war. Wars happen because of some hot headed political and military leaders who manage to get into power and lead  the governments of various countries and who lack the wisdom to see the need and importance for peace for the growth of the global welfare.

Take for example the conflicts between India and Pakistan. Even though there is conflict between both the countries today, there are many instances of citizens of India and Pakistan interacting with each other in variety of forums. Many Pakistanis have been visiting India for medical treatment and there is healthy trade relationships between both the countries.  Indian cinemas continue to remain very popular in Pakistan.  There are several Pakistani cricketers who are admired in India.

Still, India and Pakistan are unable to resolve the conflict and forge ahead, though the conflicts are causing huge diversion of funds towards military expenses for both the countries , which can be very well spent for the implementation of  much needed economic and industrial projects  and welfare programmes .
Several other similar examples can be readily pointed out such as the relation between the people of Taiwan and China , inspite of the long standing conflict between both the countries.

Mahatma Gandhi’s advocacy :

Mahatma Gandhi, one of the apostles of peace, not only propagated peace at the world level but also understood fully  the essential requirement for world peace. Since all plans of wars begin in the human mind, Mahatma Gandhi said that it has  become absolutely necessary to make  human minds to be the  abode of peace.

Without inner peace and growth of spirituality at the individual level, there can’t be any peace and tranquility at the global level. For this to happen, individuals and civil societies would have to play a proactive role towards world peace. The world  peace activists  do not seem to be successful in achieving such objective.

Is world peace  an Utopian expectation?

The Nobel peace prize awarded this year and several peace prizes awarded earlier remind us more about the  absence of peace and implying that the world peace is a distant dream , though it provides a ray of hope by recognizing the efforts of the peace activists.

Battle for the peace has to be  fought and sustained in the minds of the citizens across the countries , who should be able to  bring pressure on their respective governments to avoid conflicts and war and forge cooperation. Is this suggestion possible or is it an Utopian expectation?

Paul Ryan Says He Will No Longer Defend Donald Trump

Paul Ryan Says He Will No Longer Defend Donald Trump

BY DAVID FRANCIS-OCTOBER 10, 2016

House Speaker Paul Ryan has never seemed comfortable with GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump, but had offered tepid support for the candidate from afar. Now, days after a video of Trump describing sexual assaults on women emerged, the most powerful Republican in Congress has seemingly had enough of the real estate tycoon.

On Monday, a day after Trump debated his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, Ryan told Republican lawmakers that he will no longer defend Trump and will focus instead on defending the majority in Congress. During a conference call with the Republican conference, Ryan urged members to focus on their own reelection campaigns instead of getting Trump to the White House.

Ryan did not withdraw his endorsement of Trump. But Ryan’s decision to abandon his party’s presidential candidate is unheard of in modern politics, and makes Trump’s already difficult road to the White House all the more perilous. According to a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll conducted on Saturday and Sunday but before the second presidential debate, Clinton is up 11 points on Trump, 46 percent to 35 percent.

In a statement, Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong confirmed details of the call. “The speaker is going to spend the next month focused entirely on protecting our congressional majorities,” she said.

New of the call was first reported by the New York Times. The Times also reported that some lawmakers on the call were upset with Ryan for giving up on Trump.

Ryan is the latest Republican to distance himself from Trump after a video of him making lewd comments about women shot in 2005 leaked last Friday. Scores of GOP members used the video as an excuse to pull their support from Trump. Some even suggested his running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, leave the ticket to scuttle Trump’s campaign.

Since the video was made public, Trump has apologized. But during Sunday’s debate, he dismissed his language as “locker room talk” and accused Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, of being “abusive to women.” The businessman called Clinton a “liar” and the “Devil.” If voters were looking for some form of contrition from Trump, they did not get it at the debate.

Losing Ryan is a huge blow to Trump. But what comes next could be even worse. Other Republicans who have tolerated but never embraced Trump now have license to abandon Trump’s ship, one that appears to be quickly sinking.  

Photo credit: WIN MCNAMEE/Getty Images

'Khwezi', the woman who accused Jacob Zuma of rape, dies

Aids activist Fezekile Ntsukela Kuzwayo, who alleged South African president raped her, was 41. Zuma denied the allegations and was acquitted
 Protesters hold up anti-rape messages as President Jacob Zuma delivered a speech in Pretoria in August. Photograph: Herman Verwey/AP

Marianne Thamm for the Daily Maverick-Monday 10 October 2016

The woman who accused South Africa’s president of rape a decade ago, sparking a national debate about rape culture, has died aged 41, her family confirmed on Sunday.

Fezekile Ntsukela Kuzwayo, known to the South African public only as Khwezi to protect her identity, made headlines when she alleged that Jacob Zuma had raped her in 2005 while he was the ANC deputy president.

Kuzwayo, an Aids activist who was HIV-positive, was the daughter of an ANC member who had spent 10 years on Robben Island with Zuma, who had become a close family friend.

Zuma was acquitted on the rape charge in 2006, after claiming the sex had been consensual. In the aftermath, Kuzwayo and her mother were offered asylum in Holland after their home was burnt down and Kuzwayo received threats to “burn the bitch”.
Zuma, having been found not guilty of rape and corruption charges, became the president of South Africa in 2007.

“The news is absolutely devastating. It is a terrible tragedy. I spoke to her and her mother recently and she was just getting her life together again,” said former minister of intelligence services, Ronnie Kasrils, who knew Kuzwayo when she was a child in exile.

Kasrils and Zuma were often cared for by Kuzwayo’s parents when the two men were in the ANC underground movement during apartheid.

Kuzwayo was only 10 when her father, Judson Kuzwayo, an ANC stalwart who had spent 10 years as a Robben Island prisoner alongside his friend and comrade Zuma, died in 1985 in a car crash.

It was Kasrils whom Fezekile, also known as Fezeka, first called after the alleged rape by Zuma in the spare bedroom of his Johannesburg home on the night of Wednesday 2 November 2005.

“We should never forget her name. Fezeka Kuzwayo. Her life was completely smashed in 2005 and 2006. She was abused, hounded and castigated. It broke her. Her house was burnt down. But she was rebuilding her life again with a small group of friends who supported her and her ailing mother,” Kasrils said.

He added that she stood as a “a symbol for all of us who are abused in this violent, disgusting and patriarchal way. She is an example of what we must not do. We must show solidarity with those who are vilified for speaking out. I grieve her passing as I know we have been robbed of someone who could have made a fantastic contribution to society.”

The One in Nine Campaign against sexual violence, which was formed in 2006 in the aftermath of Zuma’s trial for alleged rape, issued a statement on Sunday that it was “devastated” by the news.

“Despite the characterisation in the mainstream corporate media and in court, Fezeka to us was a feminist, an activist, a teacher, a sister, a friend, a colleague who inspired people close to her and women who only knew her as Khwezi.”

In August a group of students staged a silent anti-rape protest inside the results centre in Pretoria as President Zuma rose to speak following regional elections.

Four women held up handwritten posters that read: “I am one in three”, “Ten Years Later”, “Khanga” and “Remember Khwezi” while Zuma continued to read his speech.

On a Twitter account only now associated with Kuzwayo now that her full name has been released, the activist described herself as a “free spirit”. Her biography read: “Daughter of freedom fighters and very independent.” 

In one of her few tweets, sent on 26 May 2011, she wrote: “I may never be free from the agony of your treachery/but will forever cherish the freedom to speak that my father got murdered for.”
A version of this article first appeared on the Daily Maverick
Residents cross their wrists above their heads — a symbol of an anti-government protest movement — in the Ethio­pian town of Bishoftu on Oct. 2. The government has declared a state of emergency after facing months of protests. (Zacharias Abubeker/AFP via Getty Images)
 The Ethiopian government painted a grim picture of a country under siege by foreign-backed gangs as it justified its newly announced six-month-long state of emergency Monday.
The measure, announced Sunday, comes as mobs have attacked foreign-owned businesses and an American was killed during unrest that exploded after astampede last week at a cultural festival killed dozens.

Government spokesman Getachew Reda told journalists that the past week of violence, in which dozens more have died, was the work of foreign-funded gangs and required more intense security measures to tackle.

“You have motorbike gangs now carrying petrol bombs, carrying firearms in groups of 10 going from place to place, terrorizing the public,” Reda said Monday. “The kind of threats we are facing, targeting infrastructure, targeting civilians, cannot be handled through ordinary law enforcement procedures.”
 
He singled out longtime regional rivals Eritrea and Egypt as being behind the attacks. Egypt on Monday denied any role and reiterated its respect for Ethiopian sovereignty, according to the state-owned Ahram Weekly.

The state of emergency means that the Ethio­pian military will take over security across the country. There will be a lower threshold for the use of force, Reda said, and due process will be suspended in some cases. Curfews will be decided on a case-by-case basis.

Security forces, however, already have been implicated in the deaths of hundreds of people in the past year in anti-government protests.

The protests began in November in the Oromia region, which surrounds the capital. People there complain of a corrupt local administration and illegal confiscation of land to set up multinational factories.

The unrest has since spread to the Amhara region, Ethiopia’s cultural heartland, and now there is turmoil in the southern provinces as well.

The Oromo people, who make up at least a third of the population, have long complained of economic and political marginalization. When protests erupted during a huge cultural festival in Oromia on Oct. 2, police fired tear gas, causing a stampede that killed at least 55 people — although the opposition estimates that the toll is at least 10 times that.

In the wake of the festival deaths, overseas opposition activists called for “five days of rage,” and there were clashes throughout the region as well as attacks on government buildings and factories.
 
At least a dozen factories were attacked this past week, as well as “90 percent” of the flower farms, Reda said. Mobs damaged Turkish, Nigerian and Dutch enterprises, according to local media reports.
A 31-year-old American academic from the University of California at Davis was killed outside Addis Ababa on Tuesday when her vehicle was stoned.

There also have been reports in the state media of mob violence directed against minority groups. Mobile Internet service has been cut across much of the country for the past week, and social media sites have been blocked.

Jawar Mohammed, a U.S.-based Oromo activist who gives regular update on events in Ethiopia on his Facebook page, dismissed the role of outside countries in the protests and said the attacks on factories are part of a strategy to bring the government to its knees.

“The centerpiece of the grand strategy in this Oromo Protests is in fact to paralyze the economic muscle of the regime by severely reducing its revenue,” he said by email. “It is working more than anticipated.”
He said only factories connected with the regime and foreign ones built on improperly confiscated land were being targeted.

Ethiopia’s economic model relies heavily on foreign companies coming in to industrialize the country and provide much-needed employment.

Mohammed expressed doubt that the new security measures would do much to dampen the protests, noting that most of Oromia has been under a de facto state of emergency since the unrest began.
Emma Gordon, senior Africa analyst for the global risk consultancy Verisk-Maplecroft, said the attacks on the economy are an effective way to pressure the government.

“The scale and frequency of the attacks on foreign assets has already rocked investor confidence in Ethiopia,” she said. “In both Amhara and Oromia, some assets have been near-totally destroyed, despite having government-sanctioned security on site. As a result, some investors are already pulling out of the country.”

Although some industries are likely to stick it out, important sectors such as tourism are expected to be severely damaged. Ethiopia, known for its mountains, rock-cut churches and hiking opportunities, has become an attractive tourist destination in recent years.

“We have been growing quite fast, we are a young business, and I had anticipated this being our best year ever by a considerable amount, but that’s not going to happen now,” said Mark Chapman of Tesfa Tours, which offers hiking trips. “We are getting a lot of cancellations.”

Protesters burned and looted tourist lodges on the popular Lake Langano in Oromia this past week.
Reda said the state of emergency will reassure investors and tourists. He added that the security measures would be coupled with dialogue to address the grievances of people in the countryside, including removing corrupt officials.

Efforts at dialogue over the past year, however, have not stopped the protests. Ethiopia is often criticized for its shortcomings on the democracy front. Every seat in parliament is held by a party allied to the government.

Jeremy Corbyn’s 21st Century Socialism

Never take the electorate for granted 

article_image
Jeremy Corbyn addresses the 2016 Labour Party Conference

by Kumar David-October 8, 2016, 5:17 pm


The UK Labour Party Conference (24-26 Sept.) ended on an upbeat note with a resoundingly confident closing address from a self-assured Corbyn, re-elected to leadership by a landslide majority. The unconcealed hostility of the British press, to its shame the Guardian included though it salvaged its reputation somewhat afterwards, attempted to undermine Corbyn and flog the "Corbyn can’t win a general election" canard. This was ignored by every category of the Party – members, trade unions, associate members and constituencies. Tony Blair and the Miliband brothers stretched themselves in a dump-Corbyn exertion to no avail. Blair was paid his wages of sin when Corbyn’s apology on behalf of the Party for involvement in the Iraq war was greeted with a standing ovation.

Let me begin by disposing of the oft heard "Labour can’t win the election under Corbyn" canard, which can be safely confined to a dialectical rubbish bin. The evolution of the electorate can never be assumed, especially these days where we witness amazing conversions at hard to imagine speeds. Which of these pundits foresaw Brexit; who said the preposterous crank Trump would ignite the US electoral scene and drive the GOP to extremis? Out of what woodwork did Sanders emerge to make everyone "feel the Bern"?

The pundits assured us that the Columbian peace deal would garner 65% support but its rejection at the 1 October referendum was as shocking as it was foolish. Whoever saw the maverick Rodrigo Duarte brazenly order extra-judicial execution of 3,000 (so far) drug peddlers and criminals and rise to 90% approval ratings thanks to it? (En passant, if Ranil and Sirisena displayed a fraction of Duarte’s spheroids in dealing with Rajapaksa era scoundrels, their esteem now would have been sky high). Who would have predicted two years ago that Marine Le Penn is likely to win the first round of the next French presidential election? The Austrian far right came within 0.1% of grabbing the presidency; ‘far-left’ Syriza governs Greece and further left Podemos will be the main opposition in Spain after the next election. Only nitwit British journalists and a few soft-left oddballs predict the certainly of a Labour Party defeat at the next elections.

The simple truth is that ever larger numbers of people in the West are becoming disillusioned with the status quo, the establishment, the capitalist system – take your choice of nouns. The middle is being hollowed out and folks are piling up on the ‘far’ right and the ‘far’ left. In truth it is no longer possible to say ‘far’ this and far that, it is the new normal. Nor are their programmes extremist; not fascist, nor cranky rebellious, nor war mongering. This is the new normal in Western society. Oh for an Edward Gibbon!

The fractal geometry of the left and right across the developed world displays startling leap-frog styles. The transformation of electorates is at astonishing speeds. Phenomena leap frog sideways from country to country (disenchantment with the EU in Europe to Brexit in Britain), or vertically in a country. Labour MPs plotted to kick out Jeremy Corbyn but he scored a landslide victory in the leadership poll. Taking account of the enthusiasm he wound up at the Conference and thanks to the passion of fired-up young Labourites, I see a galvanised Party in the fray, be it in 2017 or 2020. Labour will be helped by an economic downturn as Brexit begins to bite. Don’t imagine the Brexit plunge is over; Britain is merely passing through the eye of the storm.

Does this guarantee victory? No there is no guarantee. That Labour will win back the disillusioned-with-EU British working class in the north of England, I have no doubt. The removal of emigration from centre stage and the re-radicalisation of Labour is a death sentence to UKIP. The obstacle is elsewhere - the generation gap. Rural England is greying and dying, the over 65s are a large proportion of provincial England and they are afraid of the future. A radicalised and rejuvenated Labour Party is in their interests (resuscitation of the NHS for example) but many won’t see it. Thanks to a toxic mix of anti-emigrant paranoia and illiberalism the Tories will poll well in the generation preparing to shuffle off its mortal coil. Once the crocks are spent the future will be bright.

There is a second hurdle - Scotland. The Scottish voter, even the working class cannot be expected to desert the Scottish National Party and return in droves to Labour; nationalist emotions are too strong. If Labour can work a tactical electoral agreement and eventually a coalition government, that would be capital. The future belongs to Labour unless it does something absurdly imprudent. If not in power, it will nevertheless be the principal force in British politics. The networked surge of social democratic activism in Momentum - the re-elect Corbyn campaign - is a winning machine.

Twenty-first century

socialism

Labour with a membership of over half a million is the largest political party in Europe by membership and its traditions are rooted in democratic principles. Historically it has not been as left as European communist or social-democratic parties of yesteryear. Is this changing? Otherwise how explain the unprecedented venom and vitriol with which Corbyn’s resumption of leadership has been greeted in the British press and among pundits. There is a paradox here. If you listened to Corbyn’s Conference speech where he laid out his programme, it was surprisingly tame – no blood and fireworks, no abolition of the monarchy nor subduing of finance capital, not even much socialist rhetoric except that cryptic reference to "twenty-first century socialism".

So how interpret this paradox? Why the hand wringing of the establishment "Oh dear, oh dear, Labour has become unelectable"? Since when has the plight of the Labour Party caused the well-heeled classes so much anguish? But they are right. The small steps that have been promised (I am persuaded both by character and the ball that he has set rolling that he will do it) will give momentum to bigger changes in British society.

These small steps look like no more than a simple return to the welfare state of the post-war capitalist boom and a repeal of the worst neoliberal excess of Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair. But this small turning back, this promise of greater welfare and less austerity, not during a boom but with global capitalism still the doldrums of its greatest recession since the 1930s, will unlock Pandora’s Box. There will be no retreat for Labour and Corbyn once they set out on this road; they cannot stop history. In Tamil we say ‘Koothuku vesham pottal aadiya theera vendum’ (Once rigged for the ball, there is no end till you have danced).To turn to welfare and against austerity and to demand greater equity at this time when capitalism is in distress, is to provoke the privileged, the powerful and the wealthy to fight. The steps sketched at the Conference may be small, but then the Rubicon was a narrow stream when Caesar crossed it.

What concretely were these small steps; what the specific proposals?




* Invigoration, nay rescue of the National Health Service from the strangulation it has suffered at Thatcherite and Blairite hands.

* A small tax on business (the eventual beneficiaries) to overcome student loan problems.

* Repeal of the reactionary Trade Unions Act.

* A national investment bank and investment in infrastructure to rebuild the economy.

*A new settlement for small business. Self-employed people will eclipse the number of public sector workers so a bold appeal was made to people in the informal economy offering them social security and access to finance. Assistance for "successful innovators".

*Refusal to abandon immigrants and minorities. A firm no to racism.

* Patriotism ("A Labour government will never accept second best for Britain" and "There is nothing more unpatriotic than not paying your taxes – it is vandalism"), but nationalism was tempered by class politics, a call for social justice and a turning away from imperialist foreign policy orientations.

There was careful tactical calibration of what was said. For example though Corbyn and his inner core are all for scrapping Trident nothing was said to this effect. Nor was opposition to Brexit mentioned – it was assumed as a done deal – because a huge chunk of working class Labour voters voted for Brexit and it is no secret that Corbyn himself views the EU as a rich man’s club.

Seventy percent of labour parliamentarians voted to kick out Corbyn in a political coup three months ago on the heels of the Brexit vote - which by the way will be a disaster for the Tories as the economy goes into a tailspin in the next two years. But the coup misfired and they were hoist with their own petard. The damage done by the parliamentary labour contingent must be undone and the Augean Stables cleaned out. There must be a wholesale reselection of Labour candidates before the next elections. With the Party on an uptick the leadership now has the authority to do it.