Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Malaysian army chopper crashes into remote school; 22 injured

A RMAF Sikorsky S-61A-4 Nuri in flight. Image via YouTube

  

A MALAYSIAN military helicopter crashed into a school in a rural area on Borneo island, leaving at least 22 people injured, including students, officials said.

The Malaysian air force says the helicopter, which was on a routine training flight, made an emergency crash landing early Tuesday two hours after it took off at a high school in Tawau in Sabah state. It says all 14 people on board the plane survived, and that it will investigate the cause of the crash.

District police officer Mohamad Effendi says the helicopter hit part of the roof of the school canteen when it crashed.

He said the pilot was in critical condition, and that seven students and a school worker also suffered light injuries.

Malaysian national news agency Bernama reported that the helicopter had earlier tried to land on the school field. The report also said that one of the chopper’s rotor blades was flung about 200 metres away from the scene.

Images of the accident showed the helicopter had clipped the rooftop of the school block during landing, plunging through a shelter roof.

Tawau district police chief ACP Fadil Marsus was quoted as saying that the crash caused the school to be closed for the day.“We also received reports that some students have been traumatised by the incident as it had happened during lessons in class.”

The accident caused extensive damage to a three-storey building, the living skills centre and a hall under construction at the SMK Balung high school, which is located some 40km from the town centre.

The education ministry in a statement said six out of the eight who were injured were discharged from hospital and allowed to go home after receiving treatment.

“As for the students suffering trauma, the ministry will be providing them with counseling,” said the ministry as quoted by the New Straits Times.

RBI's new regime cuts rates

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Urjit Patel speaks during a news conference after the bi-monthly monetary policy review in Mumbai, India, October 4, 2016. REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui

Tue Oct 4, 2016

India's newly minted monetary policy committee delivered a surprise 25-basis-point cut in the repo rate on Tuesday to 6.25 percent, as Reserve Bank of India Governor Urjit Patel presided over his first policy review since his appointment last month.

The latest cut extends an easing cycle that began in January 2015 under Patel's predecessor Raghuram Rajan and reduces the repo policy rate to its lowest since November 2010.

All six-members of the monetary policy committee - comprising Patel, two other RBI officials and three government appointed economists - voted for a cut.

The RBI said expectations that food inflation would ease in the months ahead had "opened up space for policy action."

"The decision of the MPC is consistent with an accommodative stance of monetary policy in consonance with the objective of achieving consumer price index inflation at 5 percent by Q4 of 2016-17," the RBI said in its statement.

The MPC, which was meeting for the first time, was introduced to make decision-making more transparent and more collegiate. Hitherto, the RBI governor had taken sole responsibility for deciding rates.

The last reduction was in April, and analysts had braced for a close vote this time. About 60 percent of analysts polled by Reuters had expected the central bank to keep the repo rate unchanged, while 40 percent had forecast a cut.

The RBI was seen as having room to act after consumer inflation eased to a five-month low of 5.05 percent in August, within the committee's 2-6 percent objective.

The central bank noted upside risks to inflation had subsided on the back of "strong sowing" and government measures to control food supply, allowing it to focus on an economy that was facing a "further slackening of external demand going forward."

In the March-June quarter economic expansion slowed to 7.1 percent annually from 7.9 percent in the previous quarter, though that still places India among the world's fastest-growing economies.

While the MPC has been given a mandate of "maintaining price stability," it must do so "while keeping in mind the objective of growth," according to the amended RBI Act.

Making his first public appearance since becoming governor, Patel credited the government for actions that had helped reduce structural constraints on supply that typically drive up inflation in India, including through investments in railways and roads.

"If I look at over the next seven to eight quarters, the government has introduced structural reform policies which is of course done to ease supply constraints," Patel told a news briefing.

"The proactive food management has played a crucial role in the past two years and will continue to play a crucial role in time to come."

MORE DOVISH?

The appointment of Patel, who had formerly been a deputy governor, was widely welcomed by investors, who expected the fight against inflation to be maintained.

Analysts, however, saw signs that the RBI's new regime might be willing to be more accommodative than Rajan, a former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, who had helped drag inflation down from double-digit levels.

"The statement is definitely more dovish than the earlier policy regime," said A Prasanna, economist at ICICI Securities Primary Dealership Ltd in Mumbai.

"All this means there could be a scope for another rate cut by March-end."

The broader NSE Nifty was up 0.3 percent, while the benchmark 10-year bond fell 3 basis points to 6.75 percent. The rupee extended gains to 66.40 per dollar from 66.47.

Much remains unknown about Patel's stance on other important aspects of the RBI Governor's job.
Patel did not announce any major banking measures on Tuesday though he did propose easing rules on restructuring of stressed assets by lenders, under pressure to clean up balance sheets.

(Reporting by Suvashree Dey Choudhury and Rafael Nam; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)

The US Presidential Election: Death Of A Salesman Or The Reincarnation Of The Salesman As Politician?


Colombo Telegraph
By Jude Fernando –October 3, 2016
Jude Fernando
Jude Fernando
The first presidential debate between a ‘salesman’ and a lawyer ended up with the lawyer winning the debate because the ‘salesman’ proved that he not only lacks the knowledge, skills, and etiquette to engage in a public forum, but also cares very little about morals and social responsibility in doing business. Trump was either too arrogant, self-righteous or intellectually incapable of learning from his debating consultants and campaign managers, worth millions of dollars. The skillful lawyer outsmarted the slick ‘salesman’ and crushed him. But the salesman refuses to accept the loss—and certainly the presidency is not guaranteed for the lawyer.
The debate may not have killed Trump’s chances of being the next president of the United States, even though he was unapologetic about his well-documented deplorable comments and his controversial legal and moral history. One would expect that in the United States, a country that is hypersensitive about political correctness, inclusivity, diversity, and multiculturalism, that Trump-like behavior would make a politician (or even a civilian) a social outcast and that the pre-election polls would predict a landslide victory for Clinton. The allegations against Clinton are nothing compared with those against Trump. Additionally, during the presidential debate, she took personal responsibility for some of those allegations, though she fell short of making a sincere apology. The debate, however, did little to reduce the risk the Democrats took by fielding a candidate who is unpopular both inside and outside the Democratic Party- the risk of losing an opportunity to win a hat trick of democratic presidencies.trump-and-clinton
Certainly, Trump is not an anomaly in today’s world. Nor can his popularity be explained by the absence of better candidates among the Republicans or Clinton’s unpopularity. If we are to understand Trump’s ascendancy, we need to look beyond the personalities and personal histories of Trump and Clinton. We must look beyond the way they have conducted their respective campaigns and the first debate, and the taken-for-granted differences between the Democratic and Republican political parties. We need to look at characteristics within the American political culture that have remained unchanged, and that politicians and the general public are unwilling and/or unable to disrupt. This culture is not a lone creation of politicians but also of the society’s obsession with global control, excessive of political correctness, religious conservatives, liberal institutions, and the mainstream media.
Hegemony and Security
Trump appeals to the emotional side and Clinton appeals to the intellectual side of the national-security concerns of the American public, although neither challenge the origins, goals, economic bases, or realities of national security that continue to be rooted in Dean Acheson’s assertion that “no challenge can be tolerated to the power, position, and prestige of the United States.” America’s global hegemony is a deeply ingrained ideal in the minds of most Americans, and its preservation still holds strong appeal for the American public. This is not only a political ideal but also an economic and cultural ideal that is promoted by politicians as well as educational and religious entities. What underpins these ideals is a global expansionist agenda of American security and economic and political interests, which many countries widely perceived as acts of aggressive imperialism-even when they appear in the form of ‘humanitarian imperialism’ or the principle of the ‘right to protect’. These policies have inadvertently contributed to security threats to American interests and to the lives of ordinary people in not only America but also the rest of the world.
Security threats to human life have taken many forms and, in fact, gained a life of their own and can that can no longer be traced back to their original causes. Unaccustomed to thinking about freedom and security outside the narrative of global dominance, Americans are trading their freedom for temporary security and a willingness to risk both. Hence, people lose patience with diplomacy as the main mechanism for addressing the perceived root causes of these insecurities. Under these circumstances, anyone who promises to be a spokesperson for fear and anxiety and advocates using aggressive measures to safeguard security by taking ‘control’ has a good chance of winning the presidency.

Kaine and Pence to Square Off On Security As Trump Stirs Outrage With PTSD comments

Kaine and Pence to Square Off On Security As Trump Stirs Outrage With PTSD comments

BY MOLLY O’TOOLE-OCTOBER 4, 2016 

Donald Trump’s campaign has often dispatched his unflappable, stick-to-the-script running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, for damage control operations after the Republican nominee has made controversial remarks about the military.

Pence may find himself in a similar role during Tuesday’s vice presidential debate after Trump’s latest flap, in which he suggested veterans who suffer from post-traumatic stress are not as strong as other soldiers in combat and“can’t handle it.”

His remarks at a town hall event Monday with veterans set off a storm on social media with some retired soldiers expressing incandescent rage that Trump would imply that those who suffer mental anguish are weaker than other troops. The Trump campaign, and some sympathetic vets, insisted the presidential candidate’s remarks were taken out of context.

For active-duty troops in uniform, their families and those who served since 9/11, questions about PTSD, national security and defense spending are not abstract issues but deeply personal. That goes for the two vice presidential candidates facing off in their first and only debate Tuesday in Farmville, Va. Pence’s son, Michael, is a second lieutenant in the Marine Corps and Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine’s son, Nathaniel, is a Marine infantry officer.

Trump and Democratic rival Hillary Clinton have been relying heavily on their running mates to make their commander-in-chief case for them in key swing states with sizable military communities, including in Virginia and North Carolina.

Clinton currently leads Trump in both states, by 8.2 points in Virginia and by less than a percentage point in North Carolina, according to a Real Clear Politics average of two-way polls. She leads by 3.8 points nationwide in a head-to-head matchup. Despite Clinton’s slight edge on national security issues in the polls, Trump has significant support among the military community and both campaigns are fighting hard for their votes.

With neither Trump nor Clinton having served in uniform, both Pence and Kaine often refer to their sons’ service in order to give their argument a powerful emotional punch. Pence, however, is accustomed to having to try to reassure audiences in the wake of Trump’s often inflammatory, provocative comments.

In August, as Trump continued to spar with the family of a Muslim American soldier killed in Iraq and said getting a Purple Heart from a veteran supporter was “easier” than having to earn it on the battlefield, Pence described himself on the campaign trail as the “proud father” of an active-duty Marine. He praised the “sacrifices of the best military on earth,” which he said had been squandered by Clinton and President Barack Obama.

At Monday’s event in Virginia, Trump was asked by a member of the audience about mental health options for veterans, and the Republican said more help was needed. But he also offered his own explanation for why some veterans suffer from PTSD and others don’t.

“When you talk about the mental health problems, when people come back from war and combat and they see maybe what the people in this room have seen many times over, and you’re strong and you can handle it, but a lot of people can’t handle it,” Trump said.

“And they see horror stories, they see events that you’d see in a movie and nobody would believe it,” he continued. “We need mental health help, and medical. It’s one of the things that’s least addressed, and it’s one of the things I hear the most about when I go around and talk to veterans.”

His remarks split the veterans community, with some blasting Trump while others criticized media coverage of his comments, according to the Military Times.

The Trump campaign later sent out a statement by the audience member who asked the question, Marine Staff Sgt. Chad Robichaux, president and founder of Mighty Oaks Warrior Programs in Temecula, who called it “sickening” that “anyone would twist Mr. Trump’s comments to me in order to pursue a political agenda.”

But Vice President Joe Biden, whose late son Beau served in the military and was deployed to Iraq, lashed out at Trump for what he called his “profound” ignorance. “How can he be so out of touch?

He’s not a bad guy. But how can he be so out of touch and ask to lead this country?”

The episode adds to a growing list of controversies on military topics for the tycoon-turned-reality-television star. Early in his campaign, Trump said Sen. John McCain of Arizona, a prisoner of war in Vietnam who was subjected to abuse and torture, was not a hero, though Trump himself received several medical deferments that allowed him to avoid the draft. He has implied he would fire all of the top military brass because he said they are not worth listening to, though he’s also suggested he would put generals in the top echelons of his administration. And Trump repeatedly cites an incorrect statistic for suicide among veterans, as he did again Monday.

Kaine often reminds voters of Trump’s remarks — as well as the Republican’s other controversies and gaffes on foreign policy — to make the case that Trump doesn’t have the temperament or experience to be commander in chief.

Kaine is likely to seize on the latest controversy during Tuesday night’s debate. And he also will likely focus on recent reports that Trump may not have paid federal income taxes for 18 years, that Trump may have broken the law by reportedly doing business with sanctioned Cuban and Iranian organizations, and why Trump keeps up personal and public attacks on women — including a former Miss Universe.

For his part, Pence is expected to portray the Iran nuclear deal — which Clinton has endorsed — as a disastrous agreement that will allow Tehran to build up its power in the Middle East. And he probably will repeat accusations that the Obama administration has failed to invest in the military and that Clinton cannot be trusted to protect America’s interests abroad or stand up to the country’s adversaries.

Whatever the issue, both vice presidential picks will be eager to refer to their sons in uniform to connect with military voters and their families.

In his first speech as Clinton’s vice presidential pick, in July, Kaine linked questions about Trump’s knowledge and credibility on foreign policy with his own son’s military service.
Citing Trump’s suggestion that he might pull the U.S. military out of NATO and his friendly stance toward Russia, Kaine said that his son would deploy to Europe shortly to “uphold America’s commitment to our NATO allies.”

“For me, it drives home the stakes in this election,” he said.

Photo credit: MANDEL NGAN,SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

Corbyn’s Classic Win: A Global Inspiration To Political Underdogs


Featured image courtesy the Huffington Post
 “It’s all about conventional wisdom: The powers that be decide early on who is going to win, and they don’t want their narrative disturbed.”- Koenen
LUKMAN HAREES on 10/03/2016

The idea of a plucky underdog fighting his way to victory is common in stories, but that’s not true in war; in the real world.  In an actual setting, a bunch of plucky heroes trying to make up for a lack of numbers and equipment with sheer heart and determination,  tend to get brutally ripped apart by the well trained guys who have resources, tanks and guns.  And that’s how it always happens- this includes the world of politics where vested interests and ‘cut-throatism’ rules the roost.  According to a study, co-authored by University of South Florida associate professor of psychology Joseph Vandello, ‘People intuitively appreciate the appeal of an underdog. But there has been little research on how the underdog label in politics impacts voter attitudes, preferences and voting behavior.”

However,  there are good examples.  It happened in the case of US President Barack Obama and of President Maithripala Sirisena in Sri Lanka. Barack Obama winning the primaries in the US was a good example. The chatter in the corridors of power before the elections would have run thus  ‘The day a black man becomes president, hogs will fly.’ They must have therefore felt pretty silly on Inauguration Day. The same sentiments would have been expressed when the underdog Maithripala Sirisena offered to stand up against the mighty Rajapaksa whom everyone thought was invincible. But the people of Sri Lanka voted the reigning King away to wilderness against all predictions both scientific and horoscopic, when the underdog had a clear message to the electorate that his ways of governance will be more democratic and people friendly.

The UK Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn’s story of how he surmounted the enormous relentless challenges to his leadership will provide an apt case study for political scientists, on how political underdogs fare in actual life. Corbyn has always been something of an underdog in British politics . He was the underdog in last year’s Labour leadership election, yet he defeated the odds with 60% of the vote. He was the underdog even thereafter, with many of his critics believing he was not electable. After a near savage and an exhausting contest, Jeremy Corbyn however won the UK’s Labour Leader’s election a week ago for the  second time in two years by a landslide, securing 62% of the votes cast against his rival Owen Smith’s 38% . True, Corbyn hasn’t won the mantle of State power yet; but it is foolhardy for the Tories and his Labour critics to underestimate this indefatigable character.

The result itself was not surprising to most political observers, but certainly confounded his critics, against the backdrop of a highly charged but negative campaign launched against him by many of his parliamentary colleagues as well as the powerful Media. It is difficult to think of a greater defiance of political odds in modern times. The reasoning of the Labour MPs attempting to remove him was that he is incapable of leading them effectively (citing his lack of active campaigning in favour of “Remain” in the Brexit Referendum) , and more pertinently therefore unable to win a General Election and become Prime Minister. Labour MPs attempted to turf him out of his office in a botched coup at a time of national crisis, and 172 members of the parliamentary Labour party voted no-confidence in his leadership. This was despite the fact that in the post- election period, the Labour membership almost trebled , making Labour the largest social-democratic party in the Western world. In this backdrop, his enormous victory was not just a fluke or an accident , but rather a swim against the high-tide- Not surprisingly an inspiration to the underdogs  who face similar challenges to seek fairness and social justice in a world virtually ‘owned’ and ruled by a select few, not just in Britain but beyond as well.

According to an exclusive study from The Media Reform Coalition and Birkbeck, University of London, ‘The online and television media showed “clear and consistent bias” against Jeremy Corbyn at the start of the Labour leadership coup, and  accusing  the BBC of giving twice as much airtime to Corbyn’s critics than to his supporters on some programmes during the crisis. The results of another study undertaken by  the LSE’s Media and Communications Department, also showed that Corbyn was represented unfairly by the British press though a process of vilification that went well beyond the normal limits of fair debate and disagreement in a democracy. He was also systematically treated with scorn and ridicule in both the broadsheet and tabloid press in a way that no other political leader is or has been. Even more problematic, the British press has repeatedly associated Corbyn with terrorism and positioned him as a friend of the enemies of the UK. The result has been a failure to give the newspaper reading public a fair opportunity to form their own judgements about the leader of the country’s main opposition.

According to Media  observers, the overall conclusion from this  is that , UK journalism played an attack-dog, rather than a watchdog role in the case of Corbyn. This is unhealthy from a democratic point of view and poses serious ethical questions as to the role of the media in  democracy. Thus, ironically even in Britain, which claims to be a bastion of democratic ideals of free speech, concentration of media ownership in the hands of three companies allows for a tiny clique in Britain to effectively control the flow of information to 65 million people. Their power to do so is not held to any meaningful account, and their willingness to use their position to subvert the democratic will should not be doubted.

Why is this hurricane antipathy towards Corbyn?  Jeremy Corbyn is an unconventional party leader in a British context, more left-wing than previous leaders of the  Labour Party, contesting the neoliberal common sense and promoting  an anti-austerity and anti-war agenda. Corbyn’s rise to the leadership of the Labour Party was an earthquake in politics which reflected a deep disillusionment in the political and economic system. His tenure in that position has been shaped by a media environment which is no less in need of such an earthquake. The political, media and business establishment  has been working to bring him down as leader of the opposition. It  was about more than immolating Labour under Corbyn in the hope of removing him. It was about squeezing out of political life the new political surge he represents, and in the backdrop of the Post-Brexit atmosphere of greater politicisation, his expanding reach especially among the less privileged,  became a potent threat to the establishment.

As Corbyn’s main ally, his shadow Chancellor McDonnell said ‘The establishment was trying to use the media to “destroy” the Labour leadership through the “denigration of individuals” on a regular basis. Sometimes we have to swim against the stream and stand up to vitriol’. The new leadership wanted to transform the way the economy worked, redistribute wealth and power and create a new society. “That frightens the establishment so they’re throwing everything at us. It isn’t just the City of London or the Tories, it’s part of the establishment in our own political party as well . . . the whole establishment is coming against us,” he said. “I know this sounds paranoid but some of this is organised by the establishment to undermine us.”

It was interesting that  even after this massive victory, the anti-Corbyn plotters’ lobby was trying to dictate terms of how the Labour party should forge ahead.  As Mark Steel says in ‘Independent’ UK, ‘Even more impressive was the way the plotters all agreed, after the result, that “this shows the lessons Jeremy needs to learn, and he has to reach out”. This is an exciting development in democracy, that the side who won the least number of votes decides what the lessons are that have to be learned. Maybe this is how the anti-Corbyn section of Labour hopes to govern after a general election’. Do we see a parallel in Sri Lanka too, when even after Rajapakse was defeated convincingly by the underdog Sirisena in 2015, Rajapaksa lobby despite being the vanquished continued to act as the victor laying down the terms on which SLFP and the government should be governed?

This does not suggest that Corbyn is faultless and beyond reproach; but the fact has been that his critics have been unfair in their criticism and have failed to see the emerging trends of change in people aspirations. At a time when  almost inhuman austerity measures are in full swing strangling the poor and middle class in the UK,  it seems not to have occurred to the Tory government as well as indeed to the  Labour detractors – that the public may be showing clear signs that Corbyn as a rather welcome change. Unspun and homespun, he’s genuine and without any pretensions. He has articulated an alternative to neoliberal economics, that has been the only game in town for so long. Do voters really object to his quiet courtesy or do they mind that he doesn’t patronise them by pretending to like celebrity culturel? Do they dislike the fact he doesn’t pander to the press? Instinctively on the side of the underdog, what the fair-minded British public dislike are braying bullies, which was in the case of Corbyn, where his critics pounced on him rather savagely.

The re-election of Britain’s very own ‘Bernie Sanders’ as Labour’s leader last week was therefore a wake-up call to his critics and opponents and a favourable change to the British electorate which has been weary of  past hypocritical governments trying to assume a ‘holier than thou’ image abroad while their own people getting squeezed under the perils of capitalism, are being denied social justice. Who would have thought Bernie Sanders, who defined himself as a democratic socialist, would come to within a whisker of winning the Democratic Party nomination in the US? The country where describing someone as a socialist is used as an insult. In fact, many commentators and pollsters believe that if Bernie Sanders and not Hillary Clinton were running against Donald Trump, he would be doing much better than her.

The scores of people who are inspired by Jeremy Corbyn are thus not aliens from another planet; rather they are ordinary people who are living through the insecurities that are blighting their lives. Thousands of young people crippled by debt, and older people most in need of our NHS seeing it being starved of funds and being privatised by stealth. Establishment politicians have failed to realise changing trends and aspirations. This provides a vital lesson to the establishment and governments around the world that political underdogs armed with a clear vision and  departure from a political agenda out of tune with the times , can pose a real threat to their own existence and continuity. Of course, a real inspiration to those fighting the tyranny of majoritarianism, state hegemony and dictatorships – Sri Lanka included.

Lies Unlimited


Colombo Telegraph
By Nishthar Idroos –October 4, 2016
Nishthar Idroos
Nishthar Idroos
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” ~ George Orwell
Deceiving others. That is what the world calls a romance.”  ~ Oscar Wilde
If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently, it will be believed.” ~ Adolf Hitler
It seems we are fast stepping into an epoch where truth is relentlessly tampered and tainted. Lies elevated, enthroned and reign supreme. Trillions of dollars thrown to preserve and protect the status quo. It’s happening, we are already living it. And that’s not the bad news. The trend is trickling down at speeds deadlier than a cascading avalanche. It’s taking a toll. It’s affecting us all.
Lies manufactured at industrial scale. Disseminated with great aplomb. The world and most of its inhabitants are living the most fabulous lie and they are relishing it. Our Economics is a lie, our Politics is a lie, our Morality is a lie and so are our beliefs.
Democracy dictates that people are sovereign and elected representatives their servants. Reality is far from it. Provocative balderdash is the best way to describe this. In essence people are worse than slaves today, greatly neglected and progressively pushed to penury with a mountain of debt.
Most of humanity are slaves to banks capping their credit cards max. This is the condition of the middle-class. Those below take one day at a time and some live dangerously. Elected representatives flaunt ill-gotten wealth and seek more. We the people heap abuse and obloquy on our representatives but are quick to get amnesic. We are the very ones that stay in queues at the next polls to elect the same corrupt politicos to high office.
Monetary Policy, Fiscal policy and inflationary trends are nothing but insidious theft eating into people’s wealth. Governments know nothing beyond Keynesian Economics. Deficit spending either through Quantitative Easing or Imprudent Borrowing is the order of the day. People are squeezed to the wall. Legislators are bereft of any intellectual capacity to seriously and deeply analyze economic woes and get to the bottom of it.
Any threat to the supposedly almighty dollar is swiftly addressed with vicious aerial force whether it’s an individual, group or nation. The multi-dimensional insulation and manipulation extended to the dollar by those concerned is greater than the love shown by faithful for their creator.
Individualism and secularism has invaded and besieged the space of cherished morals. We are conditioned and choreographed to live a lie called modernity. We’ve accepted nudity for fashion, drugs and alcohol for general coping and social stimulus and all kinds of satanic music and movies for refreshing entertainment. It seems we are doing well. Propaganda and manipulation seems to be working, how mass media engineers and distorts our perceptions.
When a people are fed a big fat lie it behooves regular lubrication for long term sustainability. This too is happening with an elaborate apparatus well in intact.
As a people we exude profound amazement at the sight of a great wonder whether it’s the Eiffel tower or the Great Wall of China. The irony is that we fail to comprehend a much greater wonder within our own selves. The creation of the human being – approximately 8 billion of us testing and intermingling yet only a few able to appreciate the purpose of our creation.
Most nonchalant and negligent resorting to esoteric science and philosophy to seek refuge. Some openly claim we originated from monkeys. In western academia none escape evolution theory – the foremost and conspicuous ethos.
Beginning this century the world witnessed the biggest lie. 9/11. A new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11, published in Europhysics News – a highly respected European Physics Magazine claims that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition”
A continent that demands scientific evidence even for belief in God should take due cognizance of the latest revelation which is nothing but eminently scientific with more of it.
Sixteen years later new twists and developments are getting added to the official narrative. The US Congress has overridden Barack Obama’s veto of a bill allowing 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia. If lawsuits are opened against Saudi Arabia over the 9/11 attacks it will have far reaching consequences for the world. Obama called the vote a “dangerous precedent” while Saudi Arabia warned it risked having “disastrous consequences.”
Surely the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia can do things that can have “disastrous consequences.” For one thing if they along with oil producing countries refuse to trade oil via the dollar another lie will be exposed. Yes world war lll may start but another lie well exposed.
There isn’t a shred of an evidence to implicate Saudi Arabia. As a matter of fact all vital evidence were quite mysteriously annihilated quite early on. Saudi Arabia is the birth place of Islam and its Prophet (may Allah exalt his mention). It’s close to the hearts of all Muslims. No one would want start a war with Saudi Arabia unless someone has a sinister and ulterior motive.
Mention about lies names that naturally come to a sensible person are George W. Bush and Tony Blair. Bush administration deliberately misled the world about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Another gargantuan lie. No doubt Muslims paid dearly. The act subjugated, humiliated and wantonly annihilated Muslims. It’s estimated according to reliable sources in excess of a million Iraqis perished.
Lies and deception in the name of democracy has affected almost every country in the world. In Sri Lanka deals were made with terrorists to win elections. Terrorists who mercilessly killed Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims. Lies were then incessantly fed to the people. False promises made by Mahinda Rajapaksa in 2005 presidential election was indeed a record. How many of it were fulfilled is anybody’s guess. When he eventually left office he left the Treasury bankrupt.

Hurricane Matthew: at least six feared dead in Haiti as violent storm hits

Winds of up to 145 miles an hour batter Caribbean island as worst storm in almost a decade pounds coastal villages on way to Cuba


A partially flooded street in the Haitian capital, Port-au-Prince. Photograph: Hector Retamal/AFP/Getty Images--Hurricane Matthew approaches Port-au-Prince, Haiti Photograph: Carlos Garcia Rawlins/Reuters
 A destroyed house Saint Louis du Sud, southern Haiti. Photograph: Christian Aid--A civil protection officer asks residents to evacuate their homes near the the Grise river, in Tabarre, Haiti. Photograph: Dieu Nalio Chery/AP

-Tuesday 4 October 2016

At least six people are feared dead and several houses, churches and schools damaged after Hurricane Matthew, the fiercest Caribbean storm in almost a decade, ripped into Haiti and the Dominican Republic early on Tuesday.

The category 4 storm made landfall near Les Anglais on the western tip of Haiti at 7am EDT (11am GMT), the US hurricane centre said, bringing 145 mph winds and storm surges that pounded coastal villages.

One man died when a wave crashed through his home in the beach town of Port Salut, Haiti’s civil protection service said. He had been too sick to leave for a shelter, according to officials. A fisherman was also missing, they said.

“It’s much too early to know how bad things are but we do know there are a lot of houses that have been destroyed or damaged in the south,” Marie Alta Jean-Baptiste, the director of the country’s civil protection agency, told the Associated Press.

Prospery Raymond, country manager for the international charity Christian Aid, said three to five people had been reported dead in Haiti and three children were thought to have been killed in the Dominican Republic. He stressed, however, that there had been no official confirmation.


“The situation in the south of Haiti is very difficult,” he said. “Members of staff have had the roofs of their family homes blown away and churches and schools have been hit too.”

River levels in the capital, Port-au-Prince, are also rising to dangerous levels after two days of rain.

Speaking to the Guardian from Port-au-Prince, Raymond said the government was doing what it could to help people and had deployed army engineers to support relief efforts. He said that local and international NGOs were working in affected areas, adding that Christian Aid and its partners had ensured that shelters had been stocked with food over the weekend.

Raymond said that NGOs had also been trying to persuade people to leave their houses - something many are reluctant to do for fear of losing their belongings - and seek shelter in safe buidlings such as schools and churches.

Overnight, Haitians living in vulnerable coastal shacks on the Tiburon peninsula had frantically sought shelter as Matthew closed in, bringing heavy rain and driving the ocean into seaside towns.
The storm is forecast to spread hurricane-force winds and up to 3ft of rain across hills where trees have been cut down, increasing the likelihood of flash floods and mudslides, threatening villages as well as shanty towns in the capital, Port-au-Prince.

The cyclone comes at a bad time for Haiti, where tens of thousands of people still live in tents after a 2010 earthquake that killed more than 200,000. Some 55,000 people are still thought to be living in shelters six years after the earthquake.

Cholera, introduced by UN peacekeepers, is expected to rise in the October rainy season, and the country is due to hold a long-delayed presidential election on 9 October. There have been 27,000 suspected cases of cholera already this year, a third of them in children.

Raymond said there were fears that the hurricane could spread the disease in some communities, “which means we’ll have to intervene as soon as possible and provide the right tools and the right support”.

He said food and money would be needed to ensure people could eat, fix their houses and send their children to school. Raymond also warned that the country would need help for the next 10 to 18 months if it was to recover and if those who had lost their livelihoods were to be supported.

Unicef, the UN children’s agency, has also been pre-positioning supplies such as water bladders, chlorination tablets, hygiene kits and mosquito nets.

“This is the worst storm Haiti has seen in decades and the damage will no doubt be significant,” said Marc Vincent, Unicef’s representative in Haiti. “Water-borne diseases are the first threat to children in similar situations - our first priority is to make sure children have enough safe water.”


Matthew is forecast to sweep over Cuba to the Bahamas on Tuesday and possibly reach Florida by Thursday as a major hurricane, though weaker than at present. Governor Rick Scott on Tuesday urged residents to start preparing for “direct impacts” and said heavy rain, spin off tornadoes, high winds and beach erosion were among the concerns. State officials are urging people to have at least a three-day supply of food, water and medicine on hand.

On Tuesday Barack Obama cancelled a trip to Miami planned for the next day to campaign for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.

The outer bands of the cyclone reached Haiti late on Monday, flooding dozens of houses in the town of Les Anglais when the ocean rose, the local mayor said. In the town of Les Cayes on the southern coast, the wind bent trees and the power went out. In Tiburon, another town nearby, the mayor said people who had been reluctant to leave their homes also fled when the sea rose.

The storm is expected to make a direct hit on Cuba later on Tuesday in the province of Guantánamo, the disputed home to the US naval base and military prison but also a small Cuban city.

“We are receiving people living in villages prone to flooding,” said Alexis Iglesias, head of the evacuation committee at Guantánamo University which was being used as a shelter.

The US Agency for International Development said on Monday it was providing a combined $400,000 in aid to Haiti and Jamaica. The agency said in a statement it had put relief supplies into position and was preparing to ship in additional items to the central Caribbean.

8-year-old Ava Christiansen has been battling cancer for half her life. Now a new specialized cancer treatment may be able to keep her in remission. (Whitney Leaming/The Washington Post)

 

By the time 8-year-old Ava Christianson got to the National Institutes of Health this summer, she had lost several grueling rounds to leukemia and was bracing for the next one

Ava, who is participating in a clinical trial at the National Institutes of Health, plays with her mother, Bethany Christianson, during a checkup visit in September. (Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post)--Ava receives T-cell therapy for leukemia from nurse Julie Thompson at the NIH Clinical Center. Her mother stays nearby for support. (Bill O'Leary/The Washington Post)
With her leukemia in remission following a promising immunotherapy procedure being tested at NIH, Ava was able to start third grade with her friends. (Marvin Joseph/The Washington Post)

Intensive chemotherapy, which cures up to 90 percent of children with the most common type of leukemia, hadn’t kept her cancer from coming back. Neither had a painful bone-marrow transplant nor an experimental treatment. Her careworn father cried in the shower to hide his anguish. Her mother couldn’t help but wonder, “Why is this happening to our child?”

But Ava was fortunate in one respect. New discoveries in the burgeoning field of immunotherapy are offering lifelines to desperate patients who previously had none. “Five years ago,” said her mother, Bethany Christianson, “our doctor would have just had to tell us to go home.”

Instead, in a five-minute procedure at the NIH Clinical Center in late July, the freckle-faced girl got another chance to beat the acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that has stalked her since age 4. She was infused with 30 million of her own T cells, a key part of the immune system, that had been genetically modified to track down and kill her cancer like a pack of crazed dogs.

Ava’s treatment, called CAR T-cell therapy, is one of the new immunotherapies that attempt to rally the body’s own defenses to fight malignancies. Unlike other cancer advances, it is being tested widely in children because of its stunning effectiveness in ALL, the most common pediatric cancer. In early-stage trials, many patients who had repeatedly relapsed saw their leukemia disappear. Some remain cancer free.
Yet big questions surround the therapy, and many scientists are urging caution. “There’s very real promise with this approach, but the immune system is complicated,” said Terry Fry, the National Cancer Institute scientist who is running Ava’s trial. “There’s a lot that still needs to be worked out.”
Complications can be lethal; one clinical trial was briefly halted in July after three young adults died of brain swelling. It’s also far from clear that such a personalized approach — possibly costing hundreds of thousands of dollars — is economically viable on a large scale or will produce the lasting remissions that everyone hopes to see.

U.S. researchers running CAR T-cell trials for children and adults with leukemia and lymphoma have reported remission rates up to 90 percent in some cases. That’s a major achievement in a group whose cancer is emboldened by every treatment failure. But rates in other trials are considerably lower, and many patients eventually relapse.

“The treatment is great about getting people into remission, but not at keeping everyone in remission,” said Rebecca Gardner, a pediatric oncologist at Seattle Children’s hospital. She ran an early-stage trial using CAR T-cell therapy in which 39 of 42 patients went into complete remission. By a year, about half had relapsed, either because their T cells had inexplicably disappeared or their cancer had changed so that the T cells could no longer recognize it. “Leukemia is really smart,” she said.

Ava’s family understands that better than most. She underwent her first CAR T-cell procedure in Minnesota last year, but her leukemia returned within six months. Her treatment at NIH involved a next-generation version, developed by NCI, that used a different target for her marauding T cells. In this first-in-humans trial, she is Patient No. 18.

In late August, the Christiansons learned that Ava had gone into remission. She and her mother, who were still at the Clinical Center in Bethesda, Md., gleefully rushed home to Wisconsin so that Ava could start third grade.

Her parents, so frequently disappointed, remain guardedly optimistic. “Hope is all you have,” said her father, Jay Christianson. “We just need this to work and to stay working,” her mother added.

NCI’s Fry is careful not to make any promises about an extended remission. “I can’t say that’s going to be the case,” he said, “because we just don’t know. It’s too soon.”

Scientists have wanted for decades to marshal the immune system to vanquish cancer, but their attempts have mostly been frustrated. In the past few years, however, breakthroughs have led to the development of two types of immunotherapy — checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T cells — that are generating enormous excitement.

Checkpoint inhibitors are off-the-shelf therapies aimed at unleashing the immune system’s power to see and attack the disease. Used mostly in adults to date, they are producing impressive results, albeit in a minority of cases. The most prominent: Jimmy Carter. The former president became the poster patient when he was successfully last year treated with a checkpoint inhibitor called Keytruda, along with surgery and radiation, for his advanced melanoma.

Much of the earliest research for customized CAR T-cell therapy was conducted at the NCI, University of Pennsylvania, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Seattle Children’s.

“The technology of CAR T cells is really a breakthrough, especially for children,” said Michael Jensen, director of the Ben Towne Center for Childhood Cancer Research at Seattle Children’s Research Institute.

Almost all the initial work focused on CD19, a protein found on the surface of B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Scientists figured out ways to use a chimeric antigen receptor, or CAR, to reprogram T cells to recognize the protein and kill the cancer.

Zane Esposito, a 13-year-old from Plano, Tex., calls himself the “T-Cell Explorer.” He was diagnosed with ALL in June 2010. “I just thought my back hurt,” he said. “I couldn’t walk up the steps very well.” Almost three years of treatment, including punishing chemotherapy, provided a couple years of remission. His leukemia returned in January, and this time it didn’t respond to treatment.

Soon after Zane relapsed, he and his father bumped into friends in a local doughnut shop who told them about a TV segment on CAR T-cell therapy. Paul Esposito searched online and found Gardner’s clinical trial in Seattle. Zane signed on, got the treatment, went back into full remission and gained 25 pounds.

His Texas doctors have talked about a bone-marrow transplant to increase the chance of a true cure, but so far the Espositos have resisted. The Seattle doctors say it isn’t clear yet whether that is necessary and whether there would be still other options should Zane’s cancer recur.

Zane is moving on, with dreams of competing on “Chopped Junior” to show off his homemade pasta and pizza. On July 27, the day that Ava got her T cells, he celebrated his 13th birthday.

Ava was 4 when she started having leg pains, then trouble standing up. Her mother suspected Lyme disease. “You never think of cancer with a child,” she said, eyes filling as she recalled her daughter’s cancer diagnosis in November 2012. The doctors assured the family that it was typical leukemia — and curable.

Like most children, Ava quickly went into remission after starting the prescribed 30 months of chemotherapy. But at home in Prescott, a small city at the confluence of the Mississippi and St. Croix rivers, things didn’t get easier for the Christiansons. In early 2013, Ava was hospitalized in Minneapolis for a lung infection. About the same time, the couple’s second daughter, Audrey, was born 13 weeks premature and hospitalized in a neonatal intensive care unit in Saint Paul. Bethany, who manages occupational therapists for a nursing home chain, and Jay, a rural mail carrier, shuttled between the Twin Cities visiting their daughters.

“I would be with Ava during the day, and then when Jay got home, he would stay with Ava, and I would spend time with Audrey,” she said. “No matter what you do, you feel like a bad mom.”

A year or so after treatment began, Ava relapsed. Now she was in a much more dangerous category: 
children whose leukemia no longer responds to chemo. Her doctors arranged for a bone-marrow transplant, with her baby sister as the donor.

The transplant made her sick and the whole family miserable. Ava spent months in the hospital and then a year at home. She couldn’t go out much because of fears of infection. She missed all of first grade. But her parents had hope that the transplant would keep her cancer at bay.

At a six-month checkup, tests showed that the leukemia was back again. There were no more conventional treatments to try. But because of her two relapses, Ava was now eligible for a CAR T-cell trial at the University of Minnesota Masonic Children’s Hospital. Her T cells would be genetically altered to go after CD19. The number of cells then would be vastly increased and reinfused.

It sounded like science fiction, but Bethany Christianson found comfort in talking to the father of Emily Whitehead. In 2012, the 6-year-old Pennsylvania girl became the first child to be treated with reprogrammed T cells for leukemia. She has been in remission ever since.

Ava got her treatment in April 2015 — after her cells were extracted via a tube inserted into her neck — and five days later had a massive immune reaction with high fever and intense pain. While that is typical, some patients become dangerously ill. Yet Ava recovered fast, went into remission and attended summer school, where she learned how to make pigs-in-a-blanket and wrote her own cookbook.

By then, her parents had gotten used to living in the midst of remissions and relapses. “When she felt better, we would do everything we could,” Bethany said. They visitedRobot World, a scientifically themed attraction a few hours from Prescott. “You don’t put things off, because you are always thinking, ‘What if?’ ”
Last fall, doctors delivered the bad news. Ava’s cancer had changed so that it was no longer producing the CD19 protein, which meant her modified T cells could no longer recognize the disease. But the leukemia was still producing another common protein, called CD22, and that offered an opportunity.

As it happened, Fry, head of the blood-cancer section inNCI’s pediatric oncology branch, had already launched the world’s first trial using CAR T-cell therapy to focus on CD22. It seemed an equally promising target that could broaden the therapy’s impact, researchers thought. At the time, they didn’t realize that a significant percentage of patients in the other trials might relapse because of changes in their cancer.

Fry insisted as he designed the study that children be included, despite ever-present concerns about exposing them to safety risks. He wanted to avoid a delay in testing what could be a lifesaving pediatric treatment. “I didn’t want to take two to three years on adults, and then go back and do children,” he said.
The clinical trial already has treated nearly two dozen patients through age 30 with leukemia and lymphoma. The majority have gone into remission, although some have had their cancer return. While it is far too early to know long-term outcomes, Fry said he is convinced the CD22 treatment holds much potential. He is planning another trial next year with the Stanford University School of Medicine. It will target both proteins — CD19 and CD22 — simultaneously.

Once Ava relapsed following the Minnesota trial, Fry’s study at the NIH Clinical Center appeared to be the only option. But there was no slot immediately available. With Ava deteriorating, doctors put her on an experimental treatment that sent her into remission but had serious side effects.

They immediately stopped the medication when they learned Ava might get her T-cell therapy in January — she actually needed a high level of leukemia in her body to participate. But on this wrenching roller coaster of research and treatment, it turned out that she still had to wait several more months.

Ava’s cancer returned in June. Her T cells were extracted in preparation for the trial, even as she got sicker and sicker.

She was admitted to the Clinical Center in mid-July, to a room with dancing penguins painted on the windows. The day before her therapy, an ebullient Audrey burst into the room, and the two sisters ran down the hall to a play space.

Her mother was ready this time for the intense immune reaction that followed treatment, although she still found it hard to watch Ava spike a fever of 106. “When you see that temperature on the thermometer, every bone in your body says it’s wrong to let it get that high,” Bethany said. “Then suddenly it’s over.”
If his daughter’s cancer returns yet again, “I have no idea what we’ll do,” Jay said. “We’re kind of up against the edge.”

Fry thinks she might be able to undergo a second round of her latest immunotherapy, as long as her cancer is still producing CD22 proteins. Doctors in Minnesota also might recommend a second bone-marrow transplant — something her parents dread, saying it was the roughest treatment of all.

For now, Ava is happily back in school. “I just want her to be a kid,” Bethany Christianson said. “She has missed out on a lot of that.”