Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

CB BOND BUYER SRI LANKA’S PERPETUAL TREASURIES PROFITS UP 434-PCT TO RS5.1BN


index

( Arjun Mahendran was forced to resign over the bonds issue)

Sri Lanka Brief27/09/2016

Perpetual Treasuries Limited, a primary gilt dealership, connected the family of a controversial former Sri Lanka central bank governor, has made a profit of 5.1 billion rupees for the year to March 2016 up 434 percent from a year earlier, published data show.

The firm reported capital gains of 5.2 billion rupees from bond trading in the year to March 2016, up 581 percent from 767 million rupees a year earlier, accounts published in Sri Lanka’s Sunday Observer newspaper showed.

Under central bank regulations, all primary dealers have to publish their accounts.

Return on beginning-of-the-equity of 1,065 million was 481 percent.

Sri Lanka’s bond markets were hit by a series of controversial bond auctions involving allegations rigging and insider dealing in 2015 and 2016 during the tenure of ex-Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran.
Perpetual Treasuries is connected to Mahendran’s son-in-law and he came under fire over conflicts of interest as long term bonds were sold at high rates where large volumes.

Sri Lanka’s President Maithripala Sirisena declined to renew Mahendran’s term of office amid the allegations, which became the focus of a parliamentary inquiry.

Mahendran has denied wrongdoing.

Interest income at Perpetual Treasuries rose 162 percent to 942.8 million rupees and interest expenses rose 132 percent to 589.1 million rupees, and net interest income rose 233 percent to 353 million rupees.
The majority of profits of a primary dealer however comes from capital gains. Primary dealers in government securities, bids at government bond auctions and sell them to other buyers making a margin.
The price of a government bond rise when interest rates falls and the price falls when interest rates go up.
When rates fall, a dealer with a portfolio can sell and make profits from bond bought at a higher interest rate (low price). Interest rate volatility provides opportunities for dealers to make gains by selling down their portfolio.

Concerns were raised that after selling government bonds at high interest rates (low prices) by accepting sharply higher volumes of bids from favoured dealers effectively rigging the auctions, the bonds were then dumped dealers at low rates (high prices) on the Employees Provident Fund, which was managed by the central bank. (Colombo/Sept27/2016 – recast/updated)

– ECONOMYNEXT

Keheliya’s son’s car runs with fake number plate


TUESDAY, 27 SEPTEMBER 2016
Former Media Minister Keheliya Rambukwella’s son Ramith Rambukwella’s driving licence was temporarily cancelled by Colombo Additional Magistrate Chandana Kalansooriya when the case against him for driving under the influence of liquor was heard today (27th).
The Cinnamon Garden Police had put forward five charges against Rambukwella including negligent driving, not avoiding a possible accident, drunken driving, driving a vehicle registered under someone else’s name and driving with a fake number plate.
The Cinnamon Gardens Police told court that it was revealed that the suspect was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the accident and later when he was produced before a JMO to examine on the injuries to him from the accident the JMO in his report had stated that the suspect had a smell of alcohol as well.
The hearing was put off for further proceedings until the 18th October.

A deputy minister facing likely arrest: Ranjan

2016-09-27

A deputy minister is expected to be arrested soon because the investigations into his deals have been completed, State Minister Ranjan Ramanayake said yesterday. 

He told the media that this arrest would be historical because it would be the first instance where a deputy minister in office would be arrested on corruption charges. 

“This will prove that even a minister will not be able to get away with corruption under the present administration," 

the state minister said adding that the Bribery Commission had questioned nearly 15 ministers.

 He claimed that even Minister Rajitha Senaratne had been questioned a few times.

 “I and Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) MP Vijitha Herath have requested that the rear gate of the Bribery Commission be kept closed so that these ministers cannot get away secretly. Most of these MPs get away from the rear gate in vehicles with tinted glasses," the state minister said. (Yohan Perera)

Corruption Commission’s Director General Dilrukshi Wickramasinghe Charged With Abuse Of Office


Colombo Telegraph
September 27, 2016
The Director General of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC),Dilrukshi Wickramasinghe has been charged for corruption. A formal complaint in this regard was lodged to the Chairman of the Commission today.
Dilrukshi Dias Wickramasinghe Director General for prevention of Bribery and Corruption
Dilrukshi Dias Wickramasinghe
Director General for prevention of Bribery and Corruption
In his complaint, Public Interest Rights Activist and lawyer, Nagananda Kodituwakku accused Wickramasinghe of abusing her position to suppress and/or ignore the credible and plausible complaint made to her on 26th August 2016, against the Members of Parliament (both elected and appointed through the National List after being defeated at the General Election) in the ruling coalition and also in the opposition, who have abused their office to confer benefit and/or favour for themselves and/or others which is a punishable offence under Section 70 of the Bribery Act.
The said complaint, made against the abuse of tax-free permits by the MPs has been supported by overwhelming evidence of abuse of tax-free car permits by MPs for unjust enrichment. In the said complaint, it was mentioned that these permits have been issued in the public interest, facilitating the MPs to discharge their public office effectively, in terms of Section 3C of the Excise Special Provisions Act No 8 of 1994.
Activist Kodituwakku states that the investigation conducted by him into this fraud has revealed that these tax-free permits are sold in the open market for exorbitant sums, and in most cases for Rs. 25 million or more. The motorcar importers who purchase these permits import vehicles defrauding the entire tax component and the buyers of such vehicles register them under their names, immediately after effecting the first registration in the name of the MPs at the Department of Motor Traffic.
Kodituwakku also pointed out that most of the buyers who have bought these vehicles are reluctant to effect simultaneous transfers in their names at the Department of Motor Traffic, obviously to evade being caught in the offensive act. And instead they use the vehicle in the name of the permit holder MPs, which is also a punishable offence under Section 12 of the Motor Traffic Act.
The Activist has informed the Chairman of the Commission that he submitted a similar complaint dated 11th December 2014 made to the Commission and that too was ignored, and this dismal failure on the part of the Corruption Commission has effectively led to the breakdown of the rule of law, concerning bribery and corruption. The Chairman of the Commission has been informed that breakdown of the rule of law is such that some MPs have even resorted to take legal action, against the the buyers of their vehicles for not settling the full purchase price agreed upon, despite their selling of the vehicle (imported on a tax-free permit) itself is an illegal act.
The activist says that this gross abuse of public funds by the MPs has reached an unimaginable scale, incurring a huge loss of revenue of over Rs 7.875 billion as the government is made to lose Rs 35 million for each vehicle in this despicable and unlawful act, while the buyer of the permit only pays Rs 1650/- for each vehicle. Supporting the complaint with a report that he had furnished to the Commissioner General of Motor Traffic, requesting registration details of the MP permit vehicles, the activist states that the tax component so defrauded is shared between the MP (Rs 25 million) and the car importer (Rs 10 million) who buys the permit.
In the formal complaint made against the Wickramasinghe, Kodituwakku states that the absence of accountability process in this country has already come under scrutiny by the United Nations Human Rights Council, compelling the Government of Sri Lanka to concede that the people have no trust and confidence in the administration of justice and persuading it to co-sponsor the Resolution (A/HRC/RES/30/1) passed on 01st Oct 2015 in Geneva, Switzerland.
The activist says that the Government of Sri Lanka has been forced into this embarrassing position and disrepute, due to the failures of this nature by those who hold high public offices at the expense of the general public. He also highlighted that in Sri Lanka the lawmakers of Sri Lanka have become lawbreakers and their deceitful fraudulent actions are being shielded by the ignorance and inaction of the CIABOC, openly betraying the trust placed in it by the people of Sri Lanka.

1,000 scholars condemn pro-Israel blacklist site

Israel advocates are attempting to stifle Palestine solidarity activism on US campuses. ZUMA Press/Newscom

Nora Barrows-Friedman-27 September 2016

More than 1,000 members of faculty have condemned a website that blacklists students and educators who criticize Israel.

“We reject the McCarthyist tactics used by Canary Mission,” the scholars say in a statement initiated by students.

“We urge our fellow admissions faculty, as well as university administrators, prospective employers and all others, to join us in … standing against such bullying and attempts to shut down civic engagement and freedom of speech,” the scholars add.

The aim of the shadowy website, Canary Mission, is to punish students for their activism by harming their future academic and professional careers.

Its anonymous administrators contact potential employers and graduate student admissions committees, claiming that the students are engaged in anti-Semitic bigotry and sympathy towards terrorism.
The site is part of an increasing wave of tactics by right-wing groups on US campuses intending to silence criticism of Israel.

While Canary Mission’s creators hide behind anonymity, notorious Islamophobic demagogue Daniel Pipes hasadmitted to journalists Max Blumenthal and Julia Carmel that he knows who is responsible for the site. Pipes also acted as a go-between, conveying comments he said came from Canary Mission’s administrators to the journalists.

The statement is “a reassurance to students that faculty have their back on this,” said Cynthia Franklin, an English professor at the University of Hawai’i.

“I really think it is incumbent on faculty to stand strongly in support of students and to do that in a very visible way, especially those of us with tenure,” Franklin told The Electronic Intifada.

Franklin helped author the statement along with other scholars, students and members of Jewish Voice for Peace.

“JVP advises potential employers, university administrators and other outside parties to disregard Canary Mission because it is not a legitimate source for student or faculty recommendation or evaluation,” the group has previously said.

“Going to continue”

While some students have felt a chilling effect on their public activism after being targeted by Canary Mission, others are speaking out.

“There’s been a split between graduate students who are so appalled by the ugliness of these tactics who are willing to say, ‘we’re not going to be silenced by this’ and those who have family in Palestine who worry that they will not be able to get home,” said Franklin, who is also a member of Faculty for Justice in Palestine.

Recent graduate Sumaya Awad told The Electronic Intifada that “without any collective struggle against this site, and other blacklists that exist that are continuing to target people, this harassment and intimidation is just going to continue.”

Awad, a founding member of Students for Justice in Palestine at Williams College, told The Electronic Intifada that she faced backlash “from the very start” both by the administration and various Israel-aligned groups on campus.

“I found out I was targeted by Canary Mission midway through my senior year,” she said. “I scrolled through my profile, which very meticulously documented every single political activity I participated in at Williams and [previously] at Columbia University.”

“I was very proud of all these things I had done,” she said. “But then the very real world effects of Canary Mission started to sink in.”

The first thing that comes up on a search of her name is her Canary Mission profile, Awad said.

She added that as a visible Muslim without US citizenship, she was overcome with “constant dread” over the profile and how it could impact her student or visa status.

“It was pretty terrifying that this is the first thing that employers would see if they googled me,” Awad said, “we’re already living in a world ravaged with Islamophobia and discrimination.”

But Awad is pleased to be part of a fight back: “This is the way to combat this site and other sites of this sort … whether they are targeting Black Lives Matter activists or Muslims.”

“A threatening place”

David Lloyd, a professor at the University of California at Riverside, told The Electronic Intifada that some students have faced attacks by anonymous users of the website who have threatened them with violence and sexual assault.

“For women students in particular, this is a very threatening place to end up,” he said.

The website’s creators are “covered by their anonymity and they’re attacking people who have had the courage to speak out on a controversial issue,” Lloyd added.

“Far from repelling graduate admissions committees or potential employers, the fact of someone’s engagement with social justice issues would actually be a sign of the very qualities one wants to include in a graduate program,” Lloyd said.

As Palestine solidarity activism and the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement continue to gain support, Awad said that the existence of sites like Canary Mission proves that activists are creating a threat for Israel-aligned groups:

“Their fear is what’s causing them to react this way. It should be a push for us to continue the struggle forward, to continue connecting it to the different movements that already exist in the US and elsewhere.”

Here’s the Bomb Russia Is Using to Flatten Aleppo

Here’s the Bomb Russia Is Using to Flatten Aleppo


BY PAUL MCLEARY-SEPTEMBER 26, 2016

With Syria’s short-lived ceasefire buried under the rubble of the most intense bombing campaign Aleppo has seen since the start of Syria’s five-year civil war, Russia is rapidly increasing its military support for the regime in Damascus.

Over the past several days, videos have emerged of the Russian Su-25 Frogfoot strike plane supporting the Syrian army in Latakia, proving Moscow has redeployed the deadly aircraft just months after having recalled them as part of the so-called drawdown of forces. The Su-25 is to Russia’s air forces what the A-10 Warthog is to the U.S. arsenal: a low-flying jet that can maul targets on the ground.

But the aircraft helping prop up Assad’s forces pale in comparison to the wave of destruction being unleashed across rebel-held eastern Aleppo. Russian aircraft are hitting civilian neighborhoods with incendiary bombs, cluster munitions, and what is thought to be the 1,000-lb. BETAB-500 “bunker buster” bomb.


The BETAB-500 — designed to penetrate deep underground by punching holes in concrete before detonating, taking the whole building down — isn’t new to the Syrian battlefield. Russian planes have been dropping it since the start of its air campaign in September 2015, and military officials have boasted of using the bomb to demolish several Islamic State underground bunkers and weapons caches. But this is the first time it has apparently been unleashed in an urban environment.

At least 300 people have been killed in the airstrikes over the past several days, flooding the Internet with photos of dead mothers buried under the rubble, frozen in place while making a final attempt to protect their children, and emergency rooms slick with the blood of the injured and the dead.

“The city is now a ghost city,” one resident of the city told CNN. “Usually I get used to the barrel bombs and I could sleep normally — but now I can’t — the new missiles are so loud and horrifying.”

At a U.N. Security Council meeting on Sunday called to discuss the carnage in Syria, multiple diplomats slammed Russia for its indiscriminate use of “bunker buster” bombs that are collapsing entire buildings on top of their occupants. “What Russia is sponsoring and doing is not counter terrorism, it is barbarism,”

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Samantha Power, charged during the session.

Matthew Rycroft, the U.K. ambassador to the U.N., said the bombs “more suited to destroying military installations, are now destroying homes, decimating bomb shelters, crippling, maiming, killing dozens.”
U.N. Special Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura added that he had seen videos and pictures of incendiary bombs “that create fireballs of such intensity that they light up the pitch darkness in eastern Aleppo, as though it was actually daylight.”

The re-deployment of the Su-25 signals another shift in the the push being made by Moscow and Damascus after the death of the cease-fire. The moveindicates that Russian pilots will likely be more involved in striking small targets like rebel mortar positions, vehicles, and small groups of fighters in the Syrian countryside.

The plane, originally developed during the Cold War as a slow-flying reconnaissance aircraft capable of taking out NATO tanks and ground troops with rockets and its 30mm cannon, is far better suited to fighting in the hills of northern and western Syria than bombing cities.

It’s not clear is the deployed plane is one of the latest version of the Frogfoot, the Su-25SM3, which was set to enter operations by the end of this year. Theupgrades include new jamming capabilities which disrupt everything from shoulder-launched missiles to infrared-guided missiles, according to Russian news reports. The new plane will also have sensors meant to allow it to track enemy ground forces up to several kilometers away, and to spot threats on the ground and transmit that data back to ground forces.

Photo Credit: Ibrahim ebu Leys/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Photo Credit: SERGEI VENYAVSKY/AFP/Getty Images

Egypt’s Scorpion prison: Inmates dying due to lack of medical care, says HRW


Egyptian policemen and soldiers stand guard outside Tora prison in 2011 (AFP)

Tuesday 27 September 2016

The routine abuse of political prisoners in Egypt’s most notorious jail may have led to the deaths of some, Human Rights Watch has said.

Staff at Cairo’s Tora Maximum Security Prison – known as Scorpion Prison – have severely assaulted inmates, refused to let them see lawyers and families, and kept them locked alone in confined cells, the organisation said in its latest report. Some prisoners died because they were denied access to essential medical treatment.
Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch, said the prison ensured that political opponents are left with “no voice and no hope. Its purpose seems to be little more than a place to throw government critics and forget them."
The report, “'We Are in Tombs’: Abuses in Egypt’s Scorpion Prison”, says that the treatment by staff of Egypt’s Interior Ministry is tantamount to torture in some instances and goes against basic international principles for the treatment of detainees.

Why more people are ending up in prison

The Egyptian authorities arrested at least 41,000 political opponents, according to independent online statistics group, Wiki Thawra, from when Abdel Fattah al-Sisi came to power in July 2013 till December 2014. Tora currently holds 1,000 prisoners, including Muslim Brotherhood leaders, alleged members of Islamic State, and opponents of the Sisi government.
Relatives said that prison conditions notably worsened in March 2015, when Magdy Abd al-Ghaffar became interior minister. For five months, the interior ministry stopped all visits by lawyers and family: in some cases this prevented the delivery of essential food and medicine to the prison, which has no regular medical care nor hospital.
Relatives told HRW that Relatives said that conditions notably worsened in March 2015, when Magdy Abd al-Ghaffar, above, became interior minister (AFP)
Six inmates died between May and December 2015, the report said, of whom two had cancer and one had diabetes. Their relatives told Human Rights Watch that the lack of medical care – including a refusal to release the men – led to their deaths.
Essam Derbala, a high-ranking member of al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya (the Islamic Group), was refused access to his diabetes medicine, despite a judge and prosecutor ordering that he be allowed to take it, according to his brother and lawyer. Derbala died hours after an August 2015 court hearing, at which he shook and was semi-conscious.
Farid Ismail, a former member of parliament for the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party, died in May 2015, after suffering a hepatic coma inside the prison. He suffered from hepatitis C. Friends of Ismail said that when fellow inmates told prison guards about his absence from a prisoner-initiated roll call, they were told that it was “none of their business.” The following day he was found unconscious in his cell and died a week later at an external hospital.
'Egypt’s detention system is overflowing with critics of the government'
- Joe Stork, Human Rights Watch
“Egypt’s detention system is overflowing with critics of the government,” Stork said. “Ending the abuses at Scorpion is a small step toward improving dire conditions across the country.”
The blanket ban on visits at Tora has now been removed, although visitors are still sometimes stopped from seeing prisoners. There is no privacy for lawyers when they see inmates.
The prison, which was built in 1993, is designed to hold “preventive detainees in state security cases.” But former warden Major General Ibrahim Abd al-Ghaffar  told local media in 2012: “It was designed so that those who go in don’t come out again unless dead."

Prisoners 'sexually assaulted with pipes and hoses'

Aside from the HRW report, a long litany of reports about the conditions in Scorpion Prison has emerged during the past few years.
In August, a group of human rights organisations declared that at least 264 Egyptian political prisoners had died in detention since July 2013, many of whom were in the prison.
Meanwhile in December 2015, the families of prisoners and activists launched a campaign called after prisoner complained they had no access to suitable clothes to keep themselves warm.
Photographer Mahmoud Abdel Shakour appears in an Egyptian court in August 2016 (AFP)
In one letter, shared with MEE in March 2015 by Egypt's Nadeem Centre for the Rehabilitation of Torture Victims, a man named as Hassan Ali Ahmed described how he was forced  to “drink a mixture of water, oil, salt, washing powder, milk and tobacco” until he vomited for days on end; how prisoners were sexually assaulted with pipes and hoses; and how, on the orders of the guards, criminal detainees “beat us with electric wires … they suspend us from our shoulders naked and keep laughing and mocking us.”
And in December 2014, photojournalist Mahmoud Abou Zeid described how he was being held for 22 hours a day in a three- by four-metre cell metre cell that he shared with 12 other men. He added that his family was forced to wait seven to eight hours each time they arrived for their weekly visit, facing “insults and degrading treatment”.

HRW: What Egypt needs to do

Human Rights Watch has now called for the Egyptian interior ministry to end arbitrary bans on visits; ensure access to medical care, including doctors; and allow the minimum necessities to ensure hygiene and comfort.
It was designed so that those who go in don’t come out again unless dead
- Major General Ibrahim Abd al-Ghaffar, former warden
Other measures the group has demanded include allowing visits by international observers, the introduction of a complaints system and the investigation of deaths in custody.
Human Rights Watch interviewed 20 relatives of inmates held in Scorpion, two lawyers, and one former prisoner for the report, as well as reviewing medical files and photos of sick and deceased prisoners.

Killer Cops and Capitalism

capitalism_graphic

For several years now, America’s police abuse of black people has been played out on an international stage, courtesy of high-tech video gadgetry.  Yet, these now routine revelations of deadly encounters with “law enforcement” practices and policies have not had the same effect upon white people today that mid-20th century televised depictions of these selfsame “events” once had.


by Herbert Dyer
Settle your quarrels, come together, understand the reality of our situation, understand that fascism is already here, that people are dying who could be saved, that generations more will die or live poor butchered half-lives if you fail to act. Do what must be done, discover your humanity and your love in revolution. Pass on the torch. Join us. Give up your life for the people. — George Jackson, Blood In My Eye
( September 27, 2016, Chicago, Sri Lanka Guardian) As the entire world bears witness to two more never-ending snuff-black-people videos, this time by this nation-state’s police forces in Tulsa, and yet another in Charlotte, NC, it is crystal clear that white America is not serious about reigning in its police forces, and has no intention whatever of “reforming” in any substantive way its white supremacist-based “criminal justice system.”

Just as the cops’ self-serving “investigations” always reveal, they and their enablers never fail to somehow find the vast, vast majority of  killer cops’ actions against Black people to be not merely “justified,” but very often praiseworthy.  The justification process begins before the dead black body is even cold.  As in Ferguson, Milwaukee, Cleveland, Chicago, Baltimore, San Francisco, New York, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Baltimore, and so many, many more places and spaces where blackness intersects the deadly white core of this nation-state, the conveniently dead black body is blamed forthwith for his or her own death — especially when any previous “contact” whatsoever with “law enforcement” is dredged up from as far back as one’s elementary school days to last night.

For several years now, America’s police abuse of black people has been played out on an international stage, courtesy of high-tech video gadgetry.  Yet, these now routine revelations of deadly encounters with “law enforcement” practices and policies have not had the same effect upon white people today that mid-20th century televised depictions of these selfsame “events” once had.

Long before cellphone and dashboard cameras, social media, and the Internet, Dr. King argued that forcing white folks to face the reality of police brutality on the 6:00 news would “shock” white consciences into meaningful action.  Action that would hasten the end of not just police brutality, but,finally, begin to dismantle the scaffolding, the structure itself of four centuries of deadly, systematic white racial ideological and material superiority (“Manifest Destiny at home, and the “white man’s burden” abroad) and their operative tool, white racism.

And, King was right – to a point.  In my own lifetime, I have witnessed the clockwork regularity the spectacle of black women, black men, black girls and black boys being hosed by firemen and beaten by Southern cops; black children jeered by white mothers as they stoically traversed visible barriers of hate and scorn (occasionally with the aid of heavily armed National Guard troops) just to enter “all white” so-called “public” schools; or as white and black college students were firebombed and beaten into bloody messes on “Freedom Rider” buses – finally these nightly “news” events became too embarrassing for even many so-called  right wing white “conservatives” of the day.

And so, many of us thought – hoped – that these new fangled 21st century technologies would achieve the same results as those flickering black-and-white televised images of white resentment, white paranoia and white hatredvis-a-vis black suffering.

Surely now that cops know – today — that they are being filmed they will temper their anger, control their angst, sensitive nerves, and visceral fear of black skin. Indeed, why would they risk their jobs, personal freedom, ridicule and shame by becoming instant, if unwilling, YouTube stars?

As Salon.com writer Chauncey DeVega has so eloquently written, white people today have generally become acclimated to and even expectant of, watching the continuing abuse and murder of black people by their  vaunted “first responders” and frontline social control agents – the cops.   He likens these videos to the gruesome postcards sent through the mails right up until the 1960s of black lynchings performed by picnicking, grinning, partying mobs of white men, women and children.  They sent these talismans to friends and relatives throughout the country and across the sea – to “the Old Country.”

The recipients of these blood-soaked missives got a special vicarious charge…a reassurance, a feeling of closeness – and participation — by ogling these “Wish You Were Here” pics of revelry and relief in celebration of black death and white triumph.

In this century, though, these postcards have been supplanted by black-snuff-videos.  These murders are, as DeVega has put it, updated lynching pictographs.  Rather than the post office, the Internet and social media now serve as the medium through which these images are disseminated.  And, like the lynchings of old, today’s murders have also been, at once, reduced and elevated to spectacle.  They are, in fact, a commonplace “reality show” with an all too familiar plot.  They feature interchangeable and instantly recognizable characters. The most salient feature of black-snuff videos is that their conclusions are known by all before the video starts:   Despite “peace” marches, or righteous black outrage which spills over into a frustrated violent response, not a single material condition of the masses of black people improves.   We “protest.”  And then do what we do:  survive these latest iterations of official lynching – and wait for the next one.

And so, as Lenin famously asked in a  slim but powerful tome entitled What Is To Be Done?, let me end with an extended, powerful prescription from a martyred revolutionary writer and political prisoner – writing from the desperate solitude of Soledad prison cell.

George Jackson’s warning and direction was aimed at all people of good conscience, but most particularly at the now nearly 50 million black folks caught up in “the belly of the beast”:
International capitalism cannot be destroyed without the extremes of struggle. The entire colonial world is watching the blacks inside the US, wondering and waiting for us to come to our senses…We are on the inside. We are the only ones (besides the very small white minority Left) who can get at the monster’s heart without subjecting the world to nuclear fire.
We have a momentous historical role to act out, if we will. The whole world for all time in the future will love us and remember us as the righteous people who made it possible for the world to live on. If we fail through fear and lack of aggressive imagination, then the slaves of the future will curse us, as we sometimes curse those of yesterday.
Finally, Jackson spoke of not just the legacy that our Black Struggle must  leave, but of the meaning of revolution itself, of what a world cleansed of materialism, militarism and racism would mean…would actually be:
I don’t want to die and leave a few sad songs and a hump in the ground as my only monument. I want to leave a world that is liberated from trash, pollution, racism, nation-states, nation-state wars and armies, from pomp, bigotry, parochialism, a thousand different brands of untruth, and licentious usurious economics.
Herbert Dyer, Jr. is a Chicago-based freelance writer. Herb may be reached at:accra0306@yahoo.com.

India-Pakistan tensions rise after Modi cancels trip

India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrives for meeting with his Vietnamese counterpart Nguyen Xuan Phuc (not pictured) at the Government office in Hanoi, Vietnam September 3, 2016. REUTERS/Kham
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrives for meeting with his Vietnamese counterpart Nguyen Xuan Phuc (not pictured) at the Government office in Hanoi, Vietnam September 3, 2016. REUTERS/Kham

By Tommy Wilkes and Drazen Jorgic | NEW DELHI/ISLAMABAD-Wed Sep 28, 2016 

Tensions between India and Pakistan rose on Tuesday as India's leader cancelled a visit to a regional summit and Islamabad warned it would treat it as "an act of war" if India revoked a water treaty.

India blames Pakistan for a deadly assault on an army base in the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir this month that has heightened fears of a new conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbours.

India says militants sneaked across the de facto border that separates the countries and killed 18 soldiers on Sept. 18, the biggest loss of life for Indian security forces in the region for 14 years.
Pakistan rejects the accusation and says India should conduct a proper investigation before it apportions blame.

India said Prime Minister Narendra Modi would not attend the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) summit, a regional meeting of South Asian leaders, in Pakistan in November.

"Increasing cross-border terrorist attacks in the region and growing interference in the internal affairs of Member States by one country have created an environment that is not conducive to the successful holding of the 19th SAARC Summit," India's foreign ministry said in a statement.

"In the prevailing circumstances, the Government of India is unable to participate in the proposed summit in Islamabad."

Pakistan's foreign ministry called India's move "unfortunate" and said it remained committed to peace and regional cooperation. In a statement, it accused India of meddling in Pakistan's internal matters.

WATER TROUBLES

India's announcement came hours after Sartaj Aziz, foreign policy adviser to Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, warned India against drawing more water from three rivers that flow from India into Pakistan.

Aziz said Islamabad would seek arbitration with a commission that monitors the Indus Water Treaty if India increased its use of water from the Chenab, Jhelum and Indus rivers.

India says it does not plan to abrogate the treaty but Modi said on Monday India should "maximise" the amount of water it uses without breaching the agreement.

If India revoked the treaty, Aziz said, Pakistan would treat that as "an act of war or a hostile act against Pakistan".

"It's highly irresponsible on the part of India to even consider revocation of the Indus Water Treaty," Aziz told the national assembly.

New Delhi has vowed to respond to the Kashmir attack, and has launched a campaign to isolate Pakistan diplomatically, including through the United Nations.

Aziz said India's provocative posturing constituted a breach of the water treaty and was an attempt to deflect attention from unrest among the Muslim population in the Indian-ruled side of Kashmir.
Divided between India and Pakistan since 1947, the flashpoint of Kashmir lies at the heart of the countries' rivalry.

India on Tuesday summoned Pakistan's High Commissioner in New Delhi and told him that security forces had in their custody two men from Pakistan-controlled Kashmir who had helped the gunmen cross the border before launching the army base raid.

Indian and Pakistani mistrust has long undermined South Asian cooperation and is widely blamed for the poor performance of SAARC, which successive Indian leaders hoped would help South Asia become a viable economic counterweight to China.

(Reporting by Tommy Wilkes; Editing by Andrew Roche)

Why Aren't Politicians More Cautious With Communications?

Broken communication
Broken communication Image: www.joshuanhook.com

http://www.salem-news.com/graphics/snheader.jpg(SALEM, Ore.) - Each election carries its own unique group of issues that have emerged just for that campaign season. In 1992, it was the North American Free Trade Agreement, a bone of contention between Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush that was also chewed on extensively by independent candidate H. Ross Perot.

As the 2016 presidential election approaches, one of the central issues is the use of an unsecured email system by another Clinton, the former president's wife, Hillary.

The way she apparently communicated with staff during her time as secretary of state, and its subsequent potential for hacking by our enemies, has her political opponents saying that she is too reckless or naïve to serve as Commander in Chief.

While most concerns about virtualization security involve hacking prevention or management of corporate intellectual property, the email issue with Clinton has opened a new realm of national security concerns in the bigger picture of internet security.

The public is concerned with how easily the contents of her emails may have fallen into the hands of enemies, and whether there may have already been damage done.

Of course, it isn't just the investigation of her actions that is involved here. There have been many instances of sloppy security actions by people at the highest levels of government, and there will always be scrutiny when those mistakes come to light.

Whether it's Richard Nixon's tapes, Ronald Reagan's secret meetings, or the aforementioned Clinton emails, loose lips always scare the public.

Whatever the particulars of the oversight, the question remains: Why are people at such high levels of government making mistakes that teenagers know not to make?

The stakes are incredibly high; there are military secrets, sensitive economic facts, and campaign strategies that can easily be accessed by the wrong people. When politicians make these missteps, there are several things that may have come into play.

Generational Issues

Without sounding ageist, the fact is that those teenagers are probably more savvy than most of the people in the upper levels of government.

People who were educated in the 1960's and 1970's had absolutely no experience with high technology during high school or college, but today's youths are swiping and scrolling on tablets before they can even read.

The most effective way to learn technology, languages, music, and many other skills is to be involved with them at a young age, and when politicians are trying to get up to speed after reaching age 40 or 50, it's a very steep learning curve.

They simply may not perceive the seriousness of the risk at hand, and their lack of understanding can come back to haunt them.

Haste Making Waste

Global issues materialize and change rapidly, and sometimes the fastest way to communicate is seen as the best one, even at the expense of security.

Users may be fully aware of the risk of using unsecured systems, but if there is no other fast avenue available, they may feel that the limited duration of the contact presents a low risk of interception, meaning that the benefits outweigh the risks and that it's worth the gamble.

The problem here is a failure to understand the long-term endurance of communications. Hitting "send" and knowing that the message will be deleted by the recipient isn't enough. The email can be accessed later at many different points along its path, making deletion an impossibility.

Recipient Issues

Sometimes government officials can operate from systems that utilize the correct systems and protocols--until they reach the intended recipient.

It doesn't matter how ironclad your email is if you send a message to someone whose system is less protected. In this age of accessibility of elected officials, in which they want to return tweets, answer emails, and respond to Facebook posts, it's too easy for the government to lower the bridge and allow hackers to cross the moat.

In this case, they are best served to use a semi-secure system, separate from the one used for sensitive information, to communicate with constituents. This gives them that air of availability without compromising other messages about more sensitive situations.

We expect our elected officials to closely guard the secure information that they are privy to. In a world of fast-moving politics, technology, and international events, it bears more attention than ever.

There are too many prying eyes trying to learn about too many important secrets for us to let our guard down, so balancing that vigilance with avoidance of paranoia is key.

Source: Salem-News Special Features Dept.

Labour: The right fights back

After heavy pounding from the Corbyn camp in the leadership election result, his opponents in the party returned fire today.
labour-story-pic
First up was Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London. He gave the required acknowledgement of Jeremy Corbyn’s renewed mandate then gave an alternative approach to politics that emphasised the need to win. You didn’t have to be trained at Bletchley Park to decipher the message: we must win, not winning is outrageous neglect of duty, we’re on course to lose.

Tuesday 27 Sep 2016

The Deputy Leader of the Labour Party Tom Watson then piled in with his own carefully phrased call for a different direction. He told delegates he was baffled why the some relentlessly attack the Blair and Brown years in power. There was some heckling (“what about Chilcot?” was one heard) and Mr Watson turned to Jeremy Corbyn and said someone hadn’t got the memo on unity. Many clapped that ad lib from Mr Watson, Jeremy Corbyn wasn’t among them. He stroked his beard.

Some close to Jeremy Corbyn regard Tom Watson as one of the most dangerous people in the Party. He has a mandate of his own (50.7% in the third round of the 2015 Deputy leadership contest to Jeremy Corbyn’s 59.5% back then – now 61.8%). They believe he’s been at the heart of the walkout from the front bench, his closest supporters assisted with the no confidence motion in Mr Corbyn and then backed Owen Smith in the leadership challenge.

It was an adrenalin filled moment in the hall when Mr Watson spoke, a novelty in a war that generally hadn’t spilled into the conference hall. The fighting’s mainly been restricted to NEC meetings, fringe meetings and bar room plotting. The Centre Right is comforting itself tonight, hitting the bars early in some cases, boasting that Mr Corbyn has been defeated 6 times over the addition of Scottish and Welsh representatives to the NEC (see previous blogs). Few of them intend to hang around until tomorrow to cheer on the man they publicly declared no confidence in not so long ago.

Mr Corbyn’s team think these lost skirmishes are as nothing to the big war. They have a beefed up mandate that obliges big name MPs to return to the front bench (there have been many efforts to win over Ed Miliband amongst others to put their shoulders to the wheel). They think they can change the rules on policy making at the November NEC away-day to their advantage. They think they have the cards and Mr Corbyn’s message in interview tonight and no doubt in his speech tomorrow will be there’s every chance of an early election and no time for disunity.