Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

 The 5:08 p.m. to Munich pulled into Salzburg Central Station, and four German police officers boarded the train. This was a migrant sweep, and the cops moved quickly past the fair-skinned passengers, questioning a group of Saudi tourists and a Chicano from Chicago.

In the last seat of the last car, the patrol found Shakira Sarwari. Eight months on the road from war-torn Kandahar, the young Afghan mother clung tightly to her 17-month-old son. Her 7-year-old daughter huddled close, nervously eying the officers. They were now one station away from their final destination:

 Germany, the promised land of refugees.

But they were not there yet — and after more than a million arrivals in 2015, the German welcome is no longer so warm. In fact, a crackdown at the border is giving those migrants who make it this far the worst odds of crossing than at any point since the height of the crisis last year. It is more evidence, some say, that as Europe’s migrant crisis stokes a mounting voter backlash, even generous Germany is quietly closing its door.

“Your passport,” asked one of the officers, who now have permission from the Austrians to stop migrants on trains bound for Germany.

Sarwari replied with a pleading look, holding up an empty palm.

“Where are you going?” the officer asked slowly. Sarwari tugged nervously at her pink headscarf. In her arms, her son squirmed and whined. Her daughter, terrified, was on the verge of tears.

“To Germany,” Sarwari said. “To Germany.”

The officer shook his head.

“You’ll have to come with us,” he said.

In September 2015, as thousands of migrants a day were converging on Europe, German Chancellor Angela Merkel issued an astounding pledge. In the face of raging wars in the Middle East, she said there was “no limit” to the number of refugees Germany could accept. That promise — along with some of the most generous refugee benefits in the world — made the same country that sparked World War II an asylum seeker’s paradise.
 
But that has already begun to change. Since March, tougher controls in the Balkans, Greece and Turkey have sharply reduced the number of new arrivals. But hundreds of migrants each week — mostly from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Africa — are still attempting to enter Germany.

Yet the nation that took in more migrants last year than the rest of Europe combined is making it harder to get in. In August, Germany refused entry to 1,070 of the 2,300 migrants — or 46 percent — it stopped on its side of the Austrian border. In January, when arrival numbers were far higher, only 7 percent of migrants were turned back.

The smaller number of arrivals now, German officials say, has allowed them to more rigorously question migrants and apply rules meant to weed out economic migrants and opportunists. But critics say the policy is too sweeping and that there’s a good chance that people who qualify for German asylum are not being given a chance to apply. A large portion of those coming now also already have family in Germany and are trying to skirt years-long waiting periods for family reunions .

Yet the German message to migrants is clear: It’s not so easy anymore.

“The reality of today’s Germany is a different one than the refugee fairytale of last summer,” said Karl Kopp, spokesman for the migrant aid group Pro Asyl.

It happens as Germany is drowning in a backlog of hundreds of thousands of asylum requests. Last year, it paid $5.91 billion in aid and shelter, more than double the cost in 2014. A violent standoff last week between migrants and right-wing Germans became the latest sign of rising tensions. Germans are investigating 60 cases of migrants allegedly conspiring with Islamist militants.

Perhaps the most important factor: The chancellor’s Christian Democratic Union is suffering steep political losses because of her refugee stance, losing ground in a string of local elections and surrendering voters to the anti-migrant, Alternative for Germany party only a year before Merkel’s possible reelection bid. After another bitter defeat in liberal Berlin, Merkel this week offered a mea culpa.

“If I could, I would turn back time, many, many years in order to be able to better prepare myself, the whole government and all those responsible, for the situation that hit us rather unexpectedly in late summer of 2015,” she said.

Germany is now rejecting more than a third of all asylum applications for those already there, and it is trying to negotiate mass returns to countries like Afghanistan. The tough-talking interior minister, Thomas de Maizière, has even suggested that Germany wants to send many refugees back to bankrupt Greece, where most of them first entered Europe.

In the graceful city of Salzburg — the birthplace of Mozart that last year turned into the main gateway into Germany for migrants — German police are going further. Since June, they have been boarding trains here to pull off irregular migrants with Austria’s blessing. Some migrants are briefly detained in Austrian jails. Most get 14 days to leave the country or apply for asylum in Austria. Still others could get pushed back by the Austrians to Italy or Slovenia.

It is all part, observers say, of Europe’s closing door.

As the German police led Shakira Sarwari off the train in Salzburg, her daughter, Setayesh, dressed in pink sneakers and an Elsa shirt from Disney’s “Frozen,” broke down in tears. In the busy terminal, and flanked by cops, they walked past gawking passengers as Sarwari tried to comfort her crying son.
“Ssh, ssh,” she said softly, cradling Mohammed in her arms.

The German police showed the three of them into an industrial-looking room fitted with a computer terminal, a few wooden desks and a bench behind a partial fence. She went behind the fence with a male officer, who did a cursory check. She placidly complied when he asked her to remove her headscarf. Mohammed cried as the police took his mother’s digital fingerprints.

As requested, she emptied her possessions onto a table — the most important being a plastic bag with a few hundred euros, all that she had left. She flushed as she was presented with, and asked to sign, a document in her native Pashtun language stating that she was being denied entry to Germany. She would later tell an interpreter that she couldn’t read or write.

Via a telephone interpreter, she was able to communicate with the police, telling them that her husband was already in Germany and she was trying to join him there.

“I want to go to Germany,” she said.

“You cannot go,” an officer explained. “Because of European law.” She was told she would need to stay in Austria.

“I do not want to stay here,” she said, shaking her head. “My husband is in Germany.”

Her girl could not stop crying now. One of the German officers, Horst Auerbach, gave her daughter a gentle look and a glass of water.

“It gets to you,” he said, a lump in his throat.

Within two hours, the family was handed over to the Austrian police. A sturdy female cop with plastic gloves took Sarwari away for a more thorough search. Afterward, the family spent the night at the main Salzburg police station.

The next morning, like most migrants taken off the trains here, she was issued an order to leave the country or apply for asylum in Austria. Some Austrian politicians are bitterly complaining that the German policy is leaving more migrants on Austria’s doorstep — although Austria, too, is trying to send some migrants back to Italy and Slovenia. Officials in Vienna say both they and the Germans are simply following European rules.

It remains unclear how efficient the German measures are at thwarting migrants. All the migrants in Salzburg are indeed being stopped. But farther north, at other border crossings, more asylum seekers are managing to get across the German border, where German officers decide whether to push them back. Almost 1 out of every 2 are refused. Decisions, officials say, are made on a case-by-case basis.

As Sarwari prepared to leave the police station, she said she had no real plan. She did not speak German or English. She did not know which way to go.

“I made it this far by myself, with the kids, and I am going to go to Germany,” she said, determined. “I will manage to find a way.”

Stephanie Kirchner contributed to this report.

Indonesia renews campaign to end female genital mutilation

Muslim women browse for headscarves at a market in Banda Aceh, Aceh province, Indonesia. Pic: APMuslim women browse for headscarves at a market in Banda Aceh, Aceh province, Indonesia. Pic: AP

 

THE Indonesian government is looking to stop the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) through a renewed campaign, despite opposition from religious leaders in the world’s largest Muslim country.

The idea to end the practice altogether was mooted over a decade ago but was met with resistance from influential Muslim clerics. Indonesia’s women’s minister Yohana Yembise said, however, that the government was engaging women’s and religious groups to raise awareness on the issue.

Yohana was quoted by the Thomson Reuters Foundation as telling foreign journalists that the government is educating groups on the dangers of FGM, and conducting a survey to provide “scientific evidence” to substantiate the government’s aim to end the practice.

“We try to approach the traditional and religious leaders to understand and to be aware that we have to end this female genital mutilation,” Yohana was quoted as saying recently.

FGM is a catch-all phrase used to refer to procedures that totally or partially remove the external female genitalia, or that injure the female genital organs for non-medical reasons. It is widely regarded as a serious and abhorrent violation of human rights.

A UN report released in February revealed that about half (49 percent) of all Indonesian girls aged 14 and younger have undergone genital mutilation (or circumcision). The figure stands in stark contrast with Indonesia’s reputation as a moderate and even progressive Muslim nation.


The report by UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund) noted that while instances of female genital mutilation are declining globally, not all countries have achieved progress on the issue. In short, the decrease in FGM is neither uniform nor sufficient.

Indeed, the report highlighted some very disturbing numbers. An estimated 200 million females in 30 countries alive today have undergone the procedure. Of that former number, over half reside in just three countries – Indonesia, Egypt, and Ethiopia.

Indonesian Students read the Quran. (File photo) Pic: AP.
Indonesian Students read the Quran. (File photo) Pic: AP.

FBM has been generally thought to be confined to Africa and the Middle East. However, its apparent popularity in Indonesia underscores its previously unrecorded prevalence throughout the globe.

In Indonesia, female circumcision is understood to be deeply rooted in religion and tradition. Its implementation varies, but is typically considered less severe than approaches common on the African continent.

Human Rights Watch Asia Division Deputy Director, Phelim Kine, said the renewed campaign was long overdue given that the government buckled to pressure from Islamic organizations in 2010 after outlawing the practice in 2006

“FGM violates women’s and girls’ rights to health and to be free from violence. The procedure, which serves no medical purpose and is irreversible, inflicts severe pain on young girls and can be life-threatening,” he said in a news release Tuesday.

He said Yembise’s attention to the horrors of FGM will hopefully spur the ministry to also address the use of “virginity tests” on female applicants to the National Police and Indonesian Armed Forces.

Indonesia’s National Police have imposed the tests, which have been described as “abusive” and “degrading”, on thousands of female applicants since as early as 1965. Kine said this was happening even though National Police principles say recruitment must be both “nondiscriminatory” and “humane.”
Kine said the “virginity tests” have been recognized internationally as violations of the right to non-discrimination and the prohibition against “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” under international human rights treaties Indonesia has ratified. He pointed out that the World Health Organization has stated unambiguously that, “There is no place for virginity (or ‘two-finger’) testing; it has no scientific validity.”

“Indonesia should show the same determination in ending “virginity testing” as it has shown in taking on FGM,” Kine said.

World's first baby born from new procedure using DNA of three people

Experts welcome news of successful mitochondrial transfer but caution against operating in countries beyond regulations

 Dr John Zhang with the world’s first baby born using DNA from three people. The baby is reported to be healthy. Photograph: New Hope Fertility Center

 Science editor-Tuesday 27 September 2016

The world’s first baby to be born from a new procedure that combines the DNA of three people appears to be healthy, according to doctors in the US who oversaw the treatment.

The baby was born on 6 April after his Jordanian parents travelled to Mexico where they were cared for by US fertility specialists.

Doctors led by John Zhang, from the New Hope Fertility Center in New York, decided to attempt the controversial procedure of mitochondrial transfer in the hope that it would give the couple a healthy child.
While many experts welcomed news of the birth, some raised concerns that the doctors had left the US to perform the procedure beyond the reach of any regulatory framework and without publishing details of the treatment.

Speaking to the New Scientist, Zhang said he went to Mexico where “there are no rules” and insisted that doing so was right. “To save lives is the ethical thing to do,” he said.

Mitochondrial transfer was legalised in the UK in 2015 but so far no other country has introduced laws to permit the technique. The treatment is aimed at parents who have a high risk of passing on debilitating and even fatal genetic diseases to their children.

 The mitochondrial transfer technique is aimed at those with a high risk of passing on debilitating diseases. Photograph: Ben Birchall/PA

The boy’s mother carries genes for the fatal Leigh syndrome, which harms the developing nervous system. The faults affect the DNA in mitochondria, the tiny battery-like structures that provide cells with energy, and are passed down from mother to child.

Ten years after the couple married, the wife became pregnant but she lost the baby in the first of four miscarriages. The couple had a baby girl in 2005 who died at the age of six, and later, a second child who lived for only eight months. Tests on the wife showed that while she was healthy, about one-quarter of her mitochondria carried the genes for Leigh syndrome.

When the couple approached Zhang for help, he decided to try the mitochondrial transfer procedure. He took the nucleus from one of the woman’s eggs and inserted it into a healthy donor’s egg that had had its own nucleus removed. He then fertilised the egg with the husband’s sperm.

The US team created five embryos but only one developed normally. This was implanted into the mother and the baby was born nine months later.

The baby is not the first child to be born with DNA from three people. In the 1990s, fertility doctors tried to boost the quality of women’s eggs by injecting cytoplasm, the cellular material that contains mitochondria, from healthy donor eggs. The procedure led to several babies being born with DNA from the parents plus the healthy donor. Some of the children developed genetic disorders and the procedure was banned.

Speaking about the latest case, Dusko Ilic, a stem cell scientist at King’s College London, said: “Without much ado, it appears the first mitochondrial donation baby was born three months ago. This was an ice-breaker. The baby is reportedly healthy. Hopefully, this will tame the more zealous critics, accelerate the field, and we will witness soon the birth of the first mitochondrial donation baby in the UK.”

But some questions remained, he said. “By performing the treatment in Mexico, the team were not subject to the same stringent regulation as some other countries would insist on. We have no way of knowing how skilful or prepared they were, and this may have been a risky thing to do.

“On the other hand, we have what appears to be a healthy baby. Because it was successful, fewer questions will be raised, but it is important that we still ask them.

“Was this the first time ever they performed the technique or were there other attempts and they are reporting this one because it was successful?

“This and other important questions remain unanswered because this work has not been published and the rest of the scientific community has been unable to examine it in detail. It’s vital that that happens soon.”

Alison Murdoch, a fertility doctor at Newcastle University, said: “If this baby has been born as suggested then that would be great news. The translation of mitochondrial donation to a clinical procedure is not a race but a goal to be achieved with caution to ensure both safety and reproducibility.”

Details of the birth are due to be presented at the American Society for Reproductive Medicine meeting in Salt Lake City in October. 

Doug Turnbull, a neurology professor at Newcastle University who pioneered mitochondrial transfer in the UK, said the technique offered hope to mothers who carried mitochondrial DNA mutations.

“There have been extensive discussions in the UK to ensure that families with mitochondrial disease get the best possible advice about their reproductive options and that any new IVF-based technique is appropriately regulated and funded. This abstract gives very little information about the technique used, the follow up of the child or the ethical approval process.”
  • This article was amended on 27 September 2016 to remove the names of some of the parties involved, which the New Scientist had not been granted permission to use.

Monday, September 26, 2016

INTER-ETHNIC GOODWILL MUST BE BUILT UPON--Jehan Perera

art 1art 2



Monday, 26 September 2016

Sri Lanka has entered into a period of conflict transformation. The theory of conflict transformation states that conflict changes the parties, their relationships and issues over time. There is a new relationship and the issues at hand can be addressed at a different level. This offers the chance to resolve the problem in a new way. The defeat of the LTTE on the battlefield and the Rajapaksa government in elections has created a big change in the environment. The way that the government handles inter-ethnic relations today is different from that of the past. The top leadership of the present government, President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, and also leading government figures such as Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera, do not see the Tamil and Muslim people separately from the Sinhalese. Their approach is to see the people as one, rather than in terms of their ethnicity or region.

The downfall of the Rajapaksa government occurred because the former government saw national politics in ethnic terms. They considered the Tamil and Muslim people not only as distinct from the Sinhalese people to whose interests they gave priority, they also saw them as potential threats to national security. This is why the security forces were permitted to remain inactive even while Sinhalese mobs attacked Muslim properties, as in Aluthgama. This is also why the former government sought to increase the size of the Sri Lankan security forces after the end of the war, instead of demobilizing them as is common when a war ends. Instead of seeking to build a new future based on the peace that had been achieved, they began to prepare for another conflict in the future. The former government had a securitization mindset which impelled them to see national security as requiring a watchful eye and a military presence over the ethnic minorities.

The non-ethnic approach to governance that the present government leadership has shown is being reciprocated by the ethnic minority political parties. They are by and large fully supportive of the government and are placing their trust in its commitment to resolve long standing problems. Even those groups that continue to believe in the need for pressure to be put upon the government in the form of people’s power, such as the Tamil People’s Council in Jaffna, have made an effort to inform their supporters that they are neither being anti government nor anti Sinhalese. The large demonstrations that took place in Jaffna last week highlighted concerns about the non-return of land taken over by the military, the release of prisoners incarcerated for years without charge and the putting up of Buddhist symbols in places where there are no Buddhists. But there also needs to be a recognition of how much has changed for the better in the past one and a half years.

PEACE BUILDING

The day before Tamil People’s Council held its rally there was a sports programme in Jaffna organized by Netball Australia in collaboration with the Foundation for Goodness in which cricket star Muttiah Muralitharan is a leading figure. Coaches and students from six schools each in Jaffna and Galle were the beneficiaries of this programme where their netball playing skills were enhanced and they were given a broader perspective about living together peacefully in one country. This programme involved coaching school children, along with their coaches, in the latest techniques in playing netball. The programme also had a peacebuilding component which was facilitated by the National Peace Council together with the Centre for Communication Training. Such people-to-people initiatives have been found to be useful in rebuilding broken relationships in post-war societies.

The representatives from Netball Australia expressed their satisfaction that both the coaching and relationship building exercises had taken place successfully. They said that a similar programme carried out in an African country had run into difficulty as the children from the two conflicting communities had refused to sit together. This is indicative of the advantage that Sri Lanka has in seeking to strengthen post-war reconciliation and unite the people of the country. In Sri Lanka it may be generally observed that children, and also adults, of the different ethnic and religious communities, tend to get on well with each other in social and professional spaces. This was the case even during the height of the war for the most part. By contrast, even in Northern Ireland today, two decades after the violence has ended, and a political solution has been found, the social gap between the communities is still wide. In Sri Lanka, this social gap is less wide.

A demonstration of the goodwill that naturally exists between the different communities was manifested in an exercise that the students were asked to undertake by the facilitators from the Centre for Communication Training. The children from the north and south were put into mixed groups and were each asked to draw a picture which described what they are, wish to be and hope to become. They were also asked to explain their drawings to those in their group. Although most students could not speak in the language of the other community, they somehow struggled to explain what their drawings meant to each other, including using whatever English they knew as the link language.

One child drew a pen and wrote letters in the Sinhala, Tamil and English alphabets. She explained that she was the pen, and writing her own life, and it would be lived in the three languages.

PUBLIC EDUCATION

The government leadership is presently charting out a roadmap to reconciliation in Sri Lanka along with the political leadership of the Tamil and Muslim parties. There are two important processes taking place that are intended to lead to the development of a new constitution and the establishment of reconciliation mechanisms. Both are going to be public processes. The constitutional reforms will have to be approved by the people at a referendum. The reconciliation process will also be a public one as it includes the setting up of a truth seeking commission, the proceedings of which will be seen and heard by the entire country. Both of these processes will also go deep into the most controversial areas of public and political life, such as the devolution of power and the charges of serious human rights violations and war crimes connected to the war.

Last week, parallel to the netball programme in Jaffna, the National Peace Council held a workshop on transitional justice at Eastern University in Batticaloa. There were about a hundred students drawn from the Tamil, Sinhalese and Muslim communities in approximately equal numbers. In their group discussion when they were asked to list their priorities in terms of reconciliation, irrespective of ethnicity, the students said that the law must apply equally to all, regardless of status or ethnicity. They also recommended having educational campaigns on the important reform processes within the country or else they said that politicians and others will exploit the ignorance of the people. Although they were divided into mono-ethnic groups, in which all the students in a group were of the same ethnicity, they took care not to hurt the sentiments of those of other ethnicities.

However, it was a matter of concern that none of the students said they were aware of the public consultations process that had taken place with regard to both constitutional change and the reconciliation mechanisms. There is an emerging vulnerability in the ongoing reconciliation process due to this lack of public awareness and public participation in the reforms that are being initiated at the highest levels of the polity. The first is that nationalist propaganda can fill in the vacuum. Among them are charges made by the Tamil People’s Council is that there is Sinhalese colonisation of Tamil lands and the building of Buddhist temples in these areas. Charges that give emotives or misleading interpretations about the reforms that are taking place are made in the South as well. The possible resurrection of the LTTE due to the actions of the government and the division of the country by the international community are some of the favourite propaganda lines. Unless countered effectively this can lead to a loss of trust and confidence and back to a negative cycle of renewed conflict. The best way forward would be to engage in greater awareness education and to find ways to make community leaders participate directly in the reconciliation process by means of people-to-people engagements.

Top 5 new racists in Sri Lanka

17-02Lankan politicians believe they deserve to be treated as royalty simply because they got the people’s vote

logoTuesday, 27 September 2016

When asked from Morgan Freeman (not Nelson Mandela) “how are we going to get rid of racism?” he answered in his god-voice “by not talking about it”.

People use racism senselessly and often as a weapon to silence others with different views, therefore has lost its real power. Calling somebody a racist is the easiest way to silence them. If you don’t like what the other person is saying and you know you can’t disprove them with facts, just call him or her a racist, you instantly win the argument.

From petty Facebook feuds to parliamentary debates, it’s an overly used tactic. While you are at it, you may also add words like sexist, xenophobic, homophobic and Islamophobic. You don’t need to know what they actually mean. Just go for the kill.

A racist is somebody who believes their group is better than another group of people. Traditionally, that distinction was based on a combination of biological, geographical and social-economical constructs attributed at birth or acquired later. Your skin colour, facial features, location of birth, parents’ occupation, language, religious beliefs, customs, traditions and the list goes on.

Sinhala vs. Tamil vs. Muslim; Buddhist vs. Hindu vs. Christian vs. Islamic or like some old school Kandyans who believe they are better than the Southerners; or the Tamils from Jaffna who believe they are better than the Tamils in the estate sector; or the Thawheed clan who believe they are better than the moderate Muslims; or the Roman Catholics who believe they are better than the Christians…

All those traditional forms of racism have been there for a long time and frankly the narrative is getting really boring. So it’s time we define the 21st century version of racism. Racism that is based on your school, university, level of education, occupation, annual income, the brand of the car your drive, length of your penis, size of your breasts, the operating system of your phone and so on. So here are the top five new racists in Sri Lanka in no particular order.

1. Doctors who believe they are better than other professionals

Okay, we all know medical doctors naturally tend to believe they are better than others. What do you expect when you keep calling them the “Living Gods!”? But it looks like they’ve taken it literally and are now getting very aggressive about it. In a recent interview their leaders surgically threatened that the Government should consider them as more important than any other professional, and therefore should be given preferential treatment when allocating perks including unrestricted access to the best schools for their children to study!

It’s one thing asking for a car permit for yourself, but asking privileges for your children is eugenics! And if we don’t give them that, they’ll stop treating patients and will leave Sri Lanka because other countries are supposedly waiting for them with open arms and the best schools for their deservingly superior children.  So much for the Hippocratic Oath!

2. University students who believe they are entitled to a government job

The Lankan university students have a mega sense of entitlement. They got the highest marks in their university entrance exam, and therefore should get a free ticket for everything for the rest of their lives. Free education, free accommodation, free food, free books, free Wi-Fi, free this, free that and of course free jobs.

They collectively protest on the roads, go on hunger strikes for months (it’s amazing how they survive without food for the 59th day of a continuous hunger strike), have press conferences and even end up in jail asking for immediate government jobs. And they don’t like entry level jobs, no… no… they want managerial posts or higher.

They also believe they are far more superior to the students who study at private higher education institutes. So superior, they think nobody else should have access to higher education other than themselves! They are like Nazis, they don’t just believe they are better than others, they actually have to eliminate the others altogether.

3. Politicians (yeah, all of them!)

Lankan politicians by definition believe they are better than the people who actually vote them in. They collectively believe they deserve to be treated as royalty simply because they got the people’s vote. There was a time when the common man was supposed to step down to the gutter when he would see a white-skinned colonial master.

Today the common man must step away or stand still while their politicians pass them with their wild security escorts. They believe 17-erangathey need multi-million-rupee super luxury cars to drive in to their constituency because they should be driving far better cars than the normal people.

They believe they are more powerful than others because people come to listen to them, stay in queue to meet them, invite them for every goddamn opening, fall on their knees to get a job, and as a result they treat others as inferior to them. Worst of all they use racism to create tensions between groups of people just so that they can win elections. 

4. Students of popular schools who believe they are better than other school children

There you go, I said it. Our school system is the primary breeding ground for racism. Once I met a former minister of foreign employment for an official meeting. I together with one of my British colleagues were asked to take seats at his table. After a while the minister emerged from inside his dining room (inside his office!) rubbing his wet hands.

While shaking his curry smelling hand, he looks up to me and ask “are you from ***** College?” I smiled and said “No”. He then said “well then you have lost the opportunity of studying at the best school”. My British colleague was twisting in disbelief. I said “well this is awkward”, although there was nothing awkward about it for him.

We all know the type. Most (not all) students and most old boys and gals of the so-called “best schools” apply the title for themselves literally and believe they are indeed the best and therefore are superior than others. And sometimes you see these popular school kids gang up to bully the kids from the “not best schools”. It extends beyond the school and into the workplace where candidates from certain schools get preferential treatment in recruitment and promotion.

5. Anti-racists

A great way to get a job in the UN or some NGO is to promote yourself as an anti-racist. They just love that type. If your parents or if your spouse happens to be from different ethnic or religious groups, you hit the jackpot. You can use that trump card and self-promote yourself as the embodiment of the perfect Sri Lankan who transcends all forms of racism.

But there is a fundamental problem in this “racists vs. anti-racists” scenario. If the so-called anti-racists believe they are better than the racists, then wouldn’t that make them racists too? If you think a “Sri Lankan” race is better than Sinhala, Tamil, Muslim or Burgher, then by the same definition you too are a dangerous racist. Perhaps this is what Morgan Freeman actually meant. Racism and anti-racism are the same inherently flawed human construct.

As long as we believe we are better than or less than others in any way, from your religion to your choice of mobile phone (you know how the iPhone users think of other phone users) we will never be able to understand “lack of racism”, I like to think that’s the true meaning of the word “unity”.

The closest alternative we have right now is to embrace “diversity” and uphold “equal opportunity”. The intention of this article is to demonstrate the absurdity of the whole concept of racism. 

(Send your feedback to eranda.ginige@gmail.com.)

Human Rights & Paranoia


By Rajan Hoole –September 24, 2016 
Dr. Rajan Hoole
Dr. Rajan Hoole
Colombo TelegraphOther events to fire the imaginations of those looking for conspiracies followed in quick succession. Amnesty International released a report on conditions in Sri Lanka in early July. It dealt with the conditions in which those arrested under the PTA of 1979 were being detained, extra-judicial killings, torture, and more recently the death of Navaratnarajah on 10.4.83 after two weeks in custody. The AI had in fact sought to discuss the report with the Government before releasing it and had sent a 72 page draft to President Jayewardene on 7th February. On 6th April, AI was told that neither the President nor a representative of the Government would discuss the report.
This was again a sign of growing paranoia. There was to be a good deal in the Press about AI and other Human Rights agencies being a Marxist conspiracy. Giving apparent substance to such thinking was the fact that Suriya Wickremasinghe, a key activist in the Civil Rights Movement of Sri Lanka, was the daughter of the late Dr. S.A. Wickremasinghe, a founder leader of the Communist Party of Ceylon. In fact several of the concerns raised by the AI had been raised by the CRM earlier. For example the CRM’s Human Rights Day Review of 3rd December 1979 signed by its president the Rt. Rev. Lakshman Wickremesinghe, the late Bishop of Kurunegala, and its secretary, Desmond Fernando, dealt with the Prevention of Terrorism Act, the Emergency Regulations and the Liberation Tigers Law.
These, the CRM Review said, “contain provisions that go far beyond any reasonable or permissible requirement of national security. They provide for arrest without warrant and without any obligation to inform relatives of the fact of such an arrest and the place of detention. They permit the prolonged detention of persons in Police custody, or in any place the minister may determine, without any rules or legal safeguards whatever, concerning their conditions of detention and interrogation”.
Another event was the appearance in the Manchester (London) Guardian of 6th July, of an article by David Selbourne. Selbourne who was covering Sri Lanka had already been to Jaffna, seen the scene of the Kantharmadam arson, spoken to many people and had made an appointment with the Chief Justice, when he was picked up by the Police and deported on the night of 25th June. The provocation for this treatment was his visit the year before, in June 1982. Having been with Athulathmudali at Oxford University, he was privileged to have a motor car ride in Colombo in the company of President Jayewardene and ministers Athulathmudali and Gamini Dissanayake. During the ride, and in other conversations, Selbourne was treated to some uninhibited remarks by his jolly companions. Selbourne reported Athulathmudali to have said, “We are going to break heads” in connection with solving the Tamil problem (Saturday Review 10.8.85). This was later denied by Athulathmudali (SR 26.10.85). Selbourne had then on his return to Britain written several frank articles in British journals and in the Illustrated Weekly of India.
Selbourne’s article in the Guardian following his deportation in June 1983 was titled, “Sri Lankan Army fails to stem violence”. It stated: “Even saffron-clad Buddhism with all its pieties is now armed with sub-machine guns”. The article quoted Amirthalingam to the effect that the TULF in keeping with its non-violence would launch a satyagraha in October. He was further quoted thus: “The underground Liberation Tigers, whose actions constantly protected by the Tamil community have claimed the lives of 37 members of the security forces since 1977, are at the forefront of the struggle for Tamil self-determination.

President: Society grapples with moral crisis

By Sugeeswara Senadhira in New York-2016-09-26

Obama's final remarks as the President of the United Nations are consistent with his view that we should all be 'world citizens.' However, the speech provoked a strong reaction from Americans who believe that the leader's job is to represent the United States first in global affairs. 'Obama: Submit to World Government,' screamed the 'Washington Free Beacon' headline.
Though the Americans are perturbed, many independent analysts think what the US President said was true. "We have to put our money where our mouths are. And we can only realize the promise of this institution's founding to replace the ravages of war with cooperation if powerful nations like my own accept constraints. Sometimes I'm criticized in my own country for professing a belief in international norms and multilateral institutions, but I'm convinced in the long run giving up some freedom of action, not giving up our ability to protect ourselves or pursue our core interests but binding ourselves to international rules, over the long-term, enhances our security, Obama said.
Final address
Though equally criticized by many, UNSG Ban Ki-moon also did not mince his words. In his final address to the U.N. General Assembly, the normally taciturn World Top Diplomat said he felt 'deep concern' as he prepares to leave office before launching into a litany of world leaders' recent failures, gulfs of mistrust divide citizens from their leaders, extremists push people into camps of 'us' and 'them,' the earth assails us with rising seas, record heat and extreme storms and the danger define the days of many.
Ban stated that recent achievements in economic development and public health are vulnerable to "grave security threats," - Armed conflicts have grown more protracted and complex. Governance failures have pushed societies past the brink. Radicalization has threatened social cohesion – precisely the response that violent extremists seek and welcome.
Ban went on to detail the consequences of these trends in Yemen, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sahel region, Ukraine, South Sudan, and North Korea. Still, he saved most of his frustration for Syria, pointing to this week's bombing of a U.N. aid convoy and saying "just when we think it cannot get any worse, the bar of depravity sinks lower."
Progressive movements
However, good news for us is that Ban saw positive progressive movements forward in Sri Lanka and Myanmar.
President Maithripala Sirisena made a candid statement at the press briefing he held at the conclusion of the New York visit. "When I came for the 70th session of the UN General Assembly last year, many leaders spoke to me. But what I noticed was that they were very curious about me and the new Sri Lankan Government. They offered us luck, but did not pass any judgment. However, this time, there was genuine appreciation over the steps we have taken and they all offered to support us. The support of the international community is not only strength but also a blessing," he said.
Addressing the UNGA on 21 September the President emphasized the government's commitment to empower our youth with the best knowledge in the world and to make Sri Lanka an exemplary democracy in the world. "My government will fulfil its responsibilities towards the people and I seek your assistance and blessings in this noble endeavour," he said.
Speaking philosophically, President Sirisena pointed out that in many parts of the world we see the unfortunate proliferation of anger, hatred, and brutality. The contemporary society is experiencing a crisis of morality. "I believe that all States should pay heed to the cry for moral values. I believe that every society must dedicate itself to raise its share of positive moral values."
Theravada Buddhism
The President pointing out that Sri Lanka is a Buddhist country, where Theravada Buddhism is practised, said that the teachings of the Buddha help us find solutions to many of the burning issues of the contemporary world.
"Similarly, I am sure the wisdom offered by the great world religions such as Christianity, Hinduism, Islam and others can help us today. As such, I am of the view that we, as States, can strengthen and foster those religions and philosophies that help us look inward," he told the world leaders.
Apart from President Obama, President Sirisena and Ban Ki-moon, the leaders who received most attention were Myanmar Foreign Minister and de facto Leader Aungsan Suu Kyi, Canadian Premier Justin Trudeau and Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Shariiff were prominent. At the same time Nawaz Shariff's attempts to get Ban Ki-moon to refer to current tension in Kashmir failed as the UN Secretary General focused more on Syria.

Body of Sri Lankan journalist who foresaw his murder to be exhumed

New autopsy ordered for Lasantha Wickrematunge, who was gunned down during the civil war after predicting he would be killed by the government

A protester holds a portrait of Lasantha Wickrematunge, who was assassinated by gunmen on motorcyles as he went to work in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Photograph: Eranga Jayawardena/AP

A protester holds a portrait of Lasantha Wickrematunge, who was assassinated by gunmen on motorcyles as he went to work in Colombo, Sri Lanka.
 A protester holds a portrait of Lasantha Wickrematunge, who was assassinated by gunmen on motorcyles as he went to work in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Photograph: Eranga Jayawardena/AP
 in Delhi and in Colombo-Monday 26 September 2016
The body of a celebrated Sri Lankan journalist gunned down in the final months of the country’s brutal civil war in 2009 will be exhumed on Tuesday as part of a fresh investigation into his death.
Lasantha Wickrematunge’s grave in Colombo has been under armed guard since the new autopsy was announced earlier in September, two months after a military intelligence official was arrested in connection with the killing of the former editor of the Sunday Leader newspaper.
Wickrematunge had foreseen his impending murder and wrote an editorial that was published three days after he was shot dead by gunmen on motorcycles while driving to work in January 2009.
“When finally I am killed, it will be the government that kills me,” he wrote, in a2,500-word piece that was republished by the Guardian and New Yorker and attracted international scrutiny of the harassment faced by Sri Lankan journalists.
Directly addressing the then-president, Mahinda Rajapaksa, the slain editor predicted an inquiry would swiftly follow his death, “but like all the inquiries you have ordered in the past, nothing will come of this one, too”.
The investigation did indeed languish, until Rajapaksa’s surprise election defeatin January 2015, when his successor, the current president Maithripala Sirisena, promised to find the journalist’s killers.
 Activists and members of Sri Lankan civil societies light candles in front of a portrait of Sunday Leader newspaper editor Lasantha Wickrematunge in a silent vigil condemning his killing in Colombo. Photograph: Gemunu Amarasinghe/AP
Sirisena in March appointed a secretary to examine violence against journalists under Rajapaksa’s near decade-long rule, including Wickrematunge’s murder and the disappearance of Prageeth Eknaligoda, a cartoonist last seen being bundled into a white van near his office in January 2010.
An army intelligence officer identified in local media as P Udalgama was arrested in July as part of the investigation and remains in custody.
According to court documents, investigating authorities requested that Wickrematunge’s body be exhumed again because two separate medical examinations at the time of his death produced contradictory results: one finding he had died due to gunshot injuries, the other finding no evidence of gun wounds at all.
Press freedom was “severely restricted” under the former president according to watchdog groups, particularly in the months surrounding the end of the civil war between the government and the separatist Tamil Tigers in May 2009.
Under Wickrematunge, the fiercely anti-establishment Sunday Leader closely scrutinised the army’s conduct of the civil war, often in the face of censorship orders, armed raids and arson attacks on the newspaper’s offices.
Wickrematunge himself was beaten twice and his home was sprayed by machine-gun fire. His first wife, Raine, fled to Australia with their children after threats against the family.
Media colleagues of the late editor were reluctant to welcome news of the fresh exhumation as a sign his killers might soon be found.
“The [investigation] has been very slow, too slow, given the pledges made by this government before it came to power,” said Lasantha Ruhunage, the president of the Sri Lanka Working Journalists’ Association 
The union has been lobbying for a presidential commission to investigate Rajapaksa-era attacks on journalists, and Ruhunage said he was concerned the appointment of a secretary in March meant “the government will bear the financial responsibility for such attacks but no convictions will be forthcoming”.
“We feel that is because members of the government armed forces could be implicated is some of these attacks,” he added.
“Even in [Wickrematunge’s] case we feel that the chances of any convictions is still remote, it could happen, but right now, I am not optimistic.”
Raine Wickrematunge, who was divorced from her ex-husband before his death, said news his body would be re-examined was “a huge shock”.
“We have gone through so much, the children have had their hearts broken and now the band-aid is going to be ripped out and the wound re-opened,” she said.
But she expressed faith the “process of uncovering the murderers is not happening in a half-hearted manner anymore” and was no longer the subject of political interference.
“This is such a welcome change after the years of sham investigation we had to endure for several years after the murder,” she said.
Rajapaksa’s election defeat in 2015 – a result he reportedly resisted by trying to order a state of emergency as results came in – has ushered in significant positive reforms in the island nation, according to human rights groups.
Restrictions on media, including internet censorship, have been largely lifted, and the constitution has been amended to restore the independence of the police, judiciary and public service commissions.
The country also plans to establish a South Africa-style truth and reconciliation commission to examine crimes committed during the three-decade civil war.
Abuses by security forces remains an issue, advocates against torture say, recording at least 17 cases under Sirisena’s administration, including Briton Velauthapillai Renukaruban, who says he was and beaten in June while visiting the north of the country to be married.
  • The caption in this article was corrected to state that Lasantha Wickrematunge was assassinated by gunmen on motorcyles as he went to work in Colombo, not “killed during a protest in Colombo”.