Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, September 2, 2016

Blast kills 12 as Philippine president visits hometown

Police investigators inspect the area of a market where an explosion happened in Davao City, Philippines September 2, 2016. REUTERS/Lean Daval Jr
Police investigators inspect the area of a market where an explosion happened in Davao City, Philippines September 2, 2016. REUTERS/Lean Daval Jr

By Manolo Serapio Jr and Manuel Mogato -Fri Sep 2, 2016

An explosion at a packed night market in the home city of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte killed at least 12 people on Friday and wounded dozens more, officials said, but the cause of the blast was not immediately clear.

The blast tore through a street market outside the high-end Marco Polo hotel, a frequent haunt of Duterte, who was in the southern city of Davao at the time but was not hurt.

"We were having a meeting and we heard a very huge explosion. The first thing we thought was 'it's a bomb'," said John Rhyl Sialmo III, 20, a student at the nearby Ateneo de Davao University.

"The area where there was the explosion was a massage parlour. So we saw these men and women from that place in their uniform, they went to the school lobby to seek help. They were soaked in blood."

Presidential spokesman Ernesto Abella, speaking to CNN Philippines, described the blast as an "unspecified explosion".

"There is nothing definite about it but it has resulted in the death of ... at least 10 persons, and injury of about 60," Abella said. Police later said two of at least 30 people taken to hospital had since died, bringing the toll to 12.

Regional police chief Manuel Guerlan said a ring of checkpoints had been thrown around the city's exit points.

"A thorough investigation is being conducted to determine the cause of the explosion," he said. "We call on all the people to be vigilant at all times."

Duterte is hugely popular in Davao, having served as its mayor for more than 22 years before his stunning national election win in May, garnered from the popularity of a promised war on drugs.

His election has prompted a spike in drug-related killings, with more than 2,000 people killed since he took office on June 30, nearly half of them in police operations.

Duterte has typically spent his weekends in Davao, in the far south of the archipelago nation, since taking office, so his presence there on a Friday was not unusual and he had given a televised news conference earlier in the day.

His son Paolo Duterte, who is vice mayor of the city, told Reuters that his father was nowhere near the scene of the blast, which happened around 10:30 p.m. (1430 GMT), and afterwards was safe at a police station.

Five men and five women were killed, Paolo Duterte said. There was no immediate claim of responsibility.

"It's a sad day for Davao and a sad day for the Philippines," Paulo Duterte said later in a statement.

Davao is located in Mindanao, a large southern island beset by decades of Muslim insurgency. The region is also home to Abu Sayyaf, a rebel group loosely linked to Islamic State and notorious for making tens of millions of dollars from kidnappings.

However, Davao itself is largely peaceful and Duterte has been credited with transforming it from a lawless town to a southern commercial hub for call centres and offshore business processing services.

Duterte had earlier on Friday shrugged off rumours of a plot to assassinate him, saying such threats were to be expected.

Asked on Thursday about the same rumour, presidential spokesman Abella described Duterte as heroic and said: "He eats that for breakfast, it’s not something new to him."

(Additional reporting by Karen Lema, Enrico Dela Cruz and Neil Jerome Morales; Writing by Martin Petty; Editing by Alex Richardson and Ralph Boulton)

Gabon opposition headquarters 'bombed by presidential guard'

Protesters clash with security forces after Ali Bongo is declared winner of presidential election by margin of less than 6,000 votes
Gabon police clear barricades in Libreville. Photograph: Marco Longari/AFP/Getty Images

 in Dakar-Thursday 1 September 2016

Gabon’s presidential guard has apparently bombed the opposition party’s headquarters during post-election violence that has threatened to split the country apart.

Clashes between angry protesters and security forces broke out in the normally peaceable central African country after the incumbent president, Ali Bongo, was declared the winner of a hotly contested election by a margin of less than 6,000 votes.

Up to 10 people have reportedly been killed and dozens wounded in violence that erupted in the capital, Libreville.

Protesters set alight part of the national parliament building, witnesses said, and plumes of smoke went up over the city skyline as cars and shops were burned.

 Flames and smoke billow from the national assembly building in Libreville on Wednesday. Photograph: Marco Longari/AFP/Getty Images

Bongo’s rival, Jean Ping, said he had gone into hiding, assuming that government forces were looking to arrest him when they stormed his party headquarters and sent a helicopter to bomb it. He has rejected the “joke” result and called for a recount.

The ruling party said it was looking for those responsible for the fires at parliament, and had arrested 1,100 people. Trucks full of people arrested under suspicion of “pillaging” were seen by AFP shaking their fists and singing the national anthem as they were driven away.

Ping looked set to win and end 50 years of rule by the Bongo family until results were announced from Haut Ogooué, the last province to have its vote counted. Almost every eligible person turned out to vote in Bongo’s home region, the electoral commission claimed, and of the 99.98% who turned out, 95% voted for the president.

“Democracy is difficult,” Bongo said in a press conference, admitting that people had died in the violence.
“Democracy is worth devoting one’s life to, and I decided to devote my own to it. Democracy is not self-proclaimed success, or small groups dedicated to destruction.”

He said his twin projects of democracy and progress had led him “to scrupulously respect the electoral code”.

Residents of Libreville said the internet and text messaging services had been shut down – a tactic also seen in the Chadian and Ugandan elections.

The headquarters of the Gabonese opposition leader Jean Ping in Libreville. Photograph: Marco Longari/AFP/Getty Images

The African Union chairwoman, Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, said the violence “could undermine peace and stability” in Gabon. Amnesty International said Gabon’s security forces should stop their “brutal response” to protesters, which it said was “inflaming an already tense situation following the vote”.

One of the European commission’s team of election observers in Gabon, Cecile Kyenge, said the president should “renounce the results that were announced”, adding: “It’s pretty well impossible to have a 99% turnout in Haut-Ogooué.”
The European Union, France and the United States called for the release of individual voting figures, and the UK’s ambassador to Gabon spoke of his concern at the “political crisis” that had engulfed the country.
“The government has a particular responsibility to ensure transparency. It is vital that all parties uphold Gabon’s reputation for stability,” Brian Olley said.

Ping, who was foreign minister under Omar Bongo, is a former chairman of the African Union – a role in which, many observers have pointed out, he did little to challenge the results of other apparently fraudulent electoral victories across the continent.


Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton addresses the National Convention of the American Legion in Cincinnati. (Bryan Woolston/Reuters)

 

The FBI on Friday released a detailed report on its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, as well as what appears to be a summary of her interview with agents, providing the most thorough look yet at the probe that has dogged the campaign of the Democratic presidential nominee.

The documents, which total 58 pages, do not seem to provide any major revelations about Clinton’s actions — though they paint her and her staff as either unaware of or unconcerned with State Department policies on email use. The materials also show that the FBI was unable to track down all of Clinton’s devices, including phones, it sought, and that made it impossible for agents to definitively answer every question they had, including whether Clinton’s emails were hacked.

“The FBI’s investigation and forensic analysis did not find evidence confirming that Clinton’s e-mail accounts or mobile devices were compromised by cyber means,” the author of the report wrote. “However, investigative limitations, including the FBI’s inability to obtain all mobile devices and various computer components associated with Clinton’s personal e-mail systems, prevented the FBI from conclusively determining whether the classified information transmitted and stored on Clinton’s personal server systems was compromised via cyber intrusion or other means.”

FBI Director James B. Comey announced in July that his agency would not recommend criminal charges against Clinton for her use of a private email server. Comey said that Clinton and her staffers were “extremely careless” in how they treated classified information, but investigators did not find they intended to mishandle such material. Nor did investigators uncover exacerbating factors — such as efforts to obstruct justice — that often lead to charges in similar cases, Comey said.

FBI Director James Comey said on July 5 that Hillary Clinton should not be charged for her use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state. Here's what he said, in three minutes. (Peter Stevenson/The Washington Post)

The FBI turned over to several congressional committees documents related to the probe and required that they be viewed only by those with appropriate security clearances, even though not all of the material was classified, legislators and their staffers have said.

Those documents included an investigative report and summaries of interviews with more than a dozen senior Clinton staffers, other State Department officials, former secretary of state Colin Powell and at least one other person. The documents released Friday represent but a fraction of those.
A summary prepared by FBI agents of their hours-long interview with Clinton in July shows that Clinton’s account to law enforcement was generally consistent with what she has said about her email situation publicly, though she repeatedly told agents she could not recall important details or specific emails she was questioned about.

She told the agents that she began using the private server as a matter of convenience and denied the set-up was intended to help evade public records laws. She indicated she never sought nor received permission to use a private server and said she largely turned over the set-up of the system to aides.
She told agents that she generally received classified material in personal briefings or on paper, which she read in specially prepared secure facilities, and that she didn’t remember ever receiving an email that she thought shouldn’t be sent through the unclassified system.

Comey has said Clinton sent and received 110 emails that the FBI assessed contained sensitive content that was classified at the time. They were generally not marked as such, however, he has said, indicating that only “a very small number” of emails contained classified markings in the body of the email but no standard headings. The State Department has said there were two such emails and they were marked in error.
“She relied on State officials to use their judgment when emailing her and could not recall anyone raising concerns with her regarding the sensitivity of the information she received at her email address,” the interview summary concludes.

Much of the interview, which is described in an 11-page summary, appears to have consisted of FBI agents showing Clinton specific email exchanges that they determined included classified content and asking her to comment. Repeatedly, Clinton said she could not remember the specific exchange but had trusted at the time that her staff at the State Department knew how to handle classified material and would not email her material they should not. The exact nature of those classified emails are redacted in the version of the summary released by the FBI but it is clear they included deliberations on drone targets. Shown one July 2012 email she exchanged with President Obama at his own highly secure address, Clinton indicated that she recalled sending the note on an airplane during a trip to Russia.

As she has said publicly, Clinton indicated that she believed her records were being preserved when she emailed other State Department officials at their government addresses. Clinton also told the FBI that she played no role in sorting her work and personal emails after she left office other than to instruct her legal team to submit to the State Department all those emails that were “work-related or arguably work related.” Comey has indicated the FBI discovered thousands of work related emails that Clinton had not turned over but said the agency found no effort to purposely delete or conceal emails.

Comey’s announcement in July offered unusual transparency into how the FBI handled the case, and he later answered questions about the matter for nearly five hours during a hearing on Capitol Hill.
People on both sides of the political aisle have criticized Comey for his blunt assessment of Clinton’s conduct and unusual release of materials to Congress. Republicans have said the bureau made inspection of them unnecessarily difficult by inappropriately mingling classified documents with unclassified ones. Democrats have said making the documents available at all — especially the summaries of witness statements — sets a bad precedent and might discourage future witnesses from sitting for voluntary interviews with agents.

Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon has said that turning over the documents was “an extraordinarily rare step that was sought solely by Republicans for the purposes of further second-guessing the career professionals at the FBI.” But he has said that if the documents were going to be shared outside the Justice Department, “they should be released widely so that the public can see them for themselves, rather than allow Republicans to mischaracterize them through selective, partisan leaks.”
Though Fallon seems to have gotten his wish, the public release of the documents will undoubtedly draw more attention to a topic that seems to have fueled negative perceptions of Clinton. A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll found that 41 percent of Americans had a favorable impression of Clinton, while 56 percent had an unfavorable one.

Has The Time Come For Anti Trade Union Movement In India ?

strike_india

by N.S.Venkataraman

( September 1, 2016, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The central trade unions in India ,which are said  to represent the central government employees and public sector organisations including banks, have threatened to go on strike on 2nd Sept.2016, raising  demands on  various  issues.

In the wake of the strike call, the panicky Government of India has tried to appease the central trade unions by raising the minimum wage for non agricultural unskilled workers. However, the trade unions have said that they would go ahead with the strike demanding several other steps such as non privatization of banks etc.

Strike now a recurring activity :

Only a few weeks back , the bank employees went on a day’s strike and “successfully” paralysed the functioning of the banks for a day all over India. The  trade union leadership was jubilant after the strike, calling it as “massive success” .

It appears that it has become a habit for the employees working in the government and public sector organisations to resort to strikes and go slow tactics for one reason or the other at regular intervals.

 They seem to be absolutely unconcerned about the inconvenience caused to the public and the national loss that invariably occur due to such strikes.
Government employees a privileged class now :

Only a few weeks back,7th pay commission was announced for central government employees extending  pay revisions and variety of benefits that would cost the exchequer of government of India several thousand millions of rupees year after year. Today, the government employees are one of the most privileged class of the country in view of the  salaries and perks they get, the retirement benefits that they receive and  high level of security of service that they enjoy.

Nepotism in government machinery – order of the day :

It is widely known that the government officials at various levels indulge in corruption and nepotism and news about corrupt dealings of the corrupt officials at various levels are reported everyday in newspapers .
There is widespread view that government departments and nepotism are closely linked together.
What about poor citizens ?

Today, in India there are around 270 million people who live below poverty line and not knowing  where their next meal would come from. They belong to unorganized class and suffer due to poor living conditions , want of quality education for children, poor medical facilities etc.

The plight of such people  do not seem to be a matter of concern for the trade unions, who go on strike at their whims and fancies.

When Karl Marx launched trade union movement , he had the oppressed class in view and not the privileged class to which the government employees now belong , who  exploit the trade union rights to increase their privileges and benefits by collective bargaining strength.

Because of such approach of trade unions, today a class conflict is now developing in India between the organized and unorganized class.

Trade unions –  political set ups :

Today, the trade unions in India are political in style and character  and there are as many trade unions as the number of political parties.

The leadership of the trade union movement are under the control of politicians of various shade.
These politicians who have got a strangle hold over the leadership of the trade unions use their trade union strength to serve their political interests.

Panicky government :

What is very sad and depressing  is that the governments in India which are again controlled by politicians, go out of the way to buy peace with the trade unions by yielding to the pressures and demands. In the process, the governments  do not seem to care that they have a duty towards the 270 million Indians who are poor and deprived  and who need share of the national income.

To the extent , the governments throw away it’s money to the demanding employees , to the same extent the money available for implementing development projects and welfare measures for the poor people get depleted.  In many states, nearly 70% of government income is spent towards salaries and benefits for the government employees and the retired ones.

Why not conduct secret ballot before strike decision ? :

There may be many employees in the government who know that the tactics of the trade unions are bad and wrong and against the interest of national progress. But, they dare not protest and silently fall into the groove, fearing isolation.

If the trade union leadership have the courage to conduct a poll amongst all the members before launching the strike, perhaps, they would know that considerable section do not approve their  tendency to go on strike now and then.

However, it is unlikely that trade union leadership in India under the stranglehold of politicians will take the risk of conducting secret ballot.

Is there need for anti trade union movement ?

With aggressive and exploitative trade unions on the one hand and panicky government lacking courage to take a stand against the exploitative methods of trade unions, the interest of the poor and down trodden remain neglected and unrepresented.

Many dispassionate thinkers in India  wonder as to whether  time has come to launch an anti trade union movement in India.

Amnesty: Honduras, Guatemala Deadliest Countries for Environmental Activists

Amnesty: Honduras, Guatemala Deadliest Countries for Environmental Activists

BY KAVITHA SURANA-SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 

On March 2, 2016 Berta Cáceres, a prominent Honduran environmental activist, was shot to death in her home. For many who followed her work, fighting against hydroelectric projects that imperil the livelihood of Lenca indigenous communities, the news was shocking, but not exactly a surprise. Cáceres had long received threats: her activism was so contentious, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights had ordered the Honduran government to implement precautionary measures to protect her last year. But the harassment continued unabated.

Cáceres wasn’t alone. An Amnesty International report released Thursday paints a picture of pervasive hostility toward environmental campaigners in both Honduras and Guatemala, calling them “the world’s deadliest countries for environmental activists” on a per-capita basis. Last year eight activists working on environmental and territory issues were killed in Honduras, and 10 were killed in Guatemala.  According to the NGO, so-called “precautionary measures” afforded to activists like Cáceres often fail miserably to make any progress in limiting harassment and intimidation.

“The tragic murder of Berta Cáceres seems to have marked a deadly turning point for human rights defenders in the region,” said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas Director at Amnesty International, in a statement. “The lack of a transparent and effective investigation into her killing has sent the abhorrent message that shooting someone, point blank, for standing up to powerful economic interests is actually allowed.”

Indeed, the trend lines point to a deteriorating climate for activists in the region. According to a report earlier this year from Global Witness, an NGO, the number of people killed for environmental activism worldwide in 2015 jumped 59 percent from the previous year, to 185. Almost two-fifths of those were indigenous people trying to protect their own ancestral lands. Fueling the uptick in Honduras and Guatemala are a tangle of factors: The increase of extraction projects in the region; the intensification of the drug wars, pushed from Colombia and Venezuela into Central America; the militarization of policing; and a judicial system rife with impunity and corruption.

In their report, Amnesty catalogued a bevy of failures by the state: Weak protective measures for activists facing threats, intimidation, and a widespread failure to carry out independent investigations into their deaths. The NGO also pointed to the stigmatization of human rights workers, often victims of smear campaigns, as contributing to the increase in violence.

“How many more human rights defenders like Berta have to die until the authorities take action to protect people who defend our planet?” asked Guevara-Rosas.

Photo credit: ORLANDO SIERRA/AFP/Getty Images

Indonesia: Parents of Medan church attacker say sorry to Christians

Pile picture of armed police officer standing guard inside a church in Jakarta, Indonesia. Earlier this morning, a man attempted to detonate an explosive inside a Medan church. Pic: AP.
Pile picture of armed police officer standing guard inside a church in Jakarta, Indonesia. Earlier this morning, a man attempted to detonate an explosive inside a Medan church. Pic: AP.

2nd September 2016

THE PARENTS of the so-called Islamic State-obsessed youth who failed his suicide bombing attempt at a church in Medan have apologized to Christians for the incident.

The apology was conveyed during a press conference yesterday at the office of the Indonesian Advocates Association (Peradi), according to Jakarta Post.

The father of the 17-year-old accused, Makmur Hasugian, was quoted in the report saying his family was shocked to hear of the attack and the attempt to kill the St Yosep Catholic Church’s parish priest Albertus Pandiangan.

“Our family apologized. There has been no intention at all from us to hurt Christians, especially Catholics. We have Christians among our family,” said the 65-year-old, who reportedly cried during the media conference.
Parents of Medan church attack suspect apologize to Christianshttp://bit.ly/2bGHb4N  
Photo published for Parents of Medan church attack suspect apologize to Christians

Parents of Medan church attack suspect apologize to Christians

Parents of Medan church attack suspect, IAH, 17, apologized on Thursday to Christians, especially Catholics, for their son’s attempt to bomb Catholic Church St. Yosep and to kill the priest, Albertus...
thejakartapost.com 
 
Makmur added, however, that his son was no criminal was likely just swayed by radical teachings.

“My son is the victim of radicalism. He is not a criminal. Someone persuaded him to do that,” he said.


The youth’s mother, 54-year-old Arista Purba was just as distraught when addressing the media. She blamed herself for the attack, saying she had failed to keep a better watch on her son.

“This is my fault. I didn’t closely monitor him,” she was quoted saying.

Arista also claimed that her son was sorry for his actions, and that this was conveyed to her when she visited him at the Medan police station.

“He apologized for terrorizing so many people and getting his family in trouble,” she said.

Last Sunday during mass, the youth who first posed as a parishioner at the church tried and failed to detonate a bomb hidden in his backpack.


According to reports, the youth left the pews suddenly and ran towards Father Albert with a burning backpack as the congregation chased and captured him. The suspect was also carrying a knife but only ended up injuring himself in the incident.

The motive of the attack was not immediately clear but churchgoers claimed the perpetrator was carrying with him symbols resembling the IS logo.

Police later seized the homemade bomb equipment, a passport and several ID cards and comfirmed that initial investigations revealed that the youth was obsessed with Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, a key leader of the IS terrorist network.

The latest attack has raised concern among authorities on the resurgence of Islamic radicalization in the Muslim-majority country.

Home to the largest population of Muslims in the world, Indonesia has suffered a spate of deadly attacks by Muslim militants since the 2002 Bali bombings that killed 202 people.

Authorities recently said they had stepped up surveillance in Indonesia’s resort Island of Bali following reports that it could fall victim to another bombing attack.


Police had earlier nabbed a militant believed to be behind the July suicide bombing at the Surakata (also known as Solo) police base and preliminary investigations revealed that the man may have been planning to stage an attack in Bali.

Earlier this year in January, a shootout and bomb attack took place in the capital of Jakarta, killing eight people, including four IS-linked insurgents.

HOW TECH GIANTS ARE DEVISING REAL ETHICS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE


By JOHN MARKOFFSEPT.-01/09/2016

Sri Lanka Brief By JOHN MARKOFFSEPT. - 01/09/2016

SAN FRANCISCO — For years, science-fiction moviemakers have been making us fear the bad things that artificially intelligent machines might do to their human creators. But for the next decade or two, our biggest concern is more likely to be that robots will take away our jobs or bump into us on the highway.

Now five of the world’s largest tech companies are trying to create a standard of ethics around the creation of artificial intelligence. While science fiction has focused on the existential threat of A.I. to humans, researchers at Google’s parent company, Alphabet, and those from Amazon, Facebook, IBM and Microsoft have been meeting to discuss more tangible issues, such as the impact of A.I. on jobs, transportation and even warfare.

Tech companies have long overpromised what artificially intelligent machines can do. In recent years, however, the A.I. field has made rapid advances in a range of areas, from self-driving cars and machines that understand speech, like Amazon’s Echo device, to a new generation of weapons systems that threaten to automate combat.

The specifics of what the industry group will do or say — even its name — have yet to be hashed out. But the basic intention is clear: to ensure that A.I. research is focused on benefiting people, not hurting them, according to four people involved in the creation of the industry partnership who are not authorized to speak about it publicly.

The importance of the industry effort is underscored in a report issued on Thursday by a Stanford University group funded by Eric Horvitz, a Microsoft researcher who is one of the executives in the industry discussions. The Stanford project, called the One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence, lays out a plan to produce a detailed report on the impact of A.I. on society every five years for the next century.

One main concern for people in the tech industry would be if regulators jumped in to create rules around their A.I. work. So they are trying to create a framework for a self-policing organization, though it is not clear yet how that will function.

“We’re not saying that there should be no regulation,” said Peter Stone, a computer scientist at the University of Texas at Austin and one of the authors of the Stanford report. “We’re saying that there is a right way and a wrong way.”

While the tech industry is known for being competitive, there have been instances when companies have worked together when it was in their best interests. In the 1990s, for example, tech companies agreed on a standard method for encrypting e-commerce transactions, laying the groundwork for two decades of growth in internet business.

The authors of the Stanford report, which is titled “Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030,” argue that it will be impossible to regulate A.I. “The study panel’s consensus is that attempts to regulate A.I. in general would be misguided, since there is no clear definition of A.I. (it isn’t any one thing), and the risks and considerations are very different in different domains,” the report says.

One recommendation in the report is to raise the awareness of and expertise about artificial intelligence at all levels of government, Dr. Stone said. It also calls for increased public and private spending on A.I.
“There is a role for government and we respect that,” said David Kenny, general manager for IBM’s Watson artificial intelligence division. The challenge, he said, is “a lot of times policies lag the technologies.”

A memorandum is being circulated among the five companies with a tentative plan to announce the new organization in the middle of September. One of the unresolved issues is that Google DeepMind, an Alphabet subsidiary, has asked to participate separately, according to a person involved in the negotiations.

The A.I. industry group is modeled on a similar human rights effort known as the Global Network Initiative, in which corporations and nongovernmental organizations are focused on freedom of expression and privacy rights, according to someone briefed by the industry organizers but not authorized to speak about it publicly.

Separately, Reid Hoffman, a founder of LinkedIn who has a background in artificial intelligence, is in discussions with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab to fund a project exploring the social and economic effects of artificial intelligence.

Both the M.I.T. effort and the industry partnership are trying to link technology advances more closely to social and economic policy issues. The M.I.T. group has been discussing the idea of designing new A.I. and robotic systems with “society in the loop.”

The phrase is a reference to the long-running debate about designing computer and robotic systems that still require interaction with humans. For example, the Pentagon has recently begun articulating a military strategy that calls for using A.I. in which humans continue to control killing decisions, rather than delegating that responsibility to machines.

“The key thing that I would point out is computer scientists have not been good at interacting with the social scientists and the philosophers,” said Joichi Ito, the director of the MIT Media Lab and a member of the board of directors of The New York Times. “What we want to do is support and reinforce the social scientists who are doing research which will play a role in setting policies.”

The Stanford report attempts to define the issues that citizens of a typical North American city will face in computers and robotic systems that mimic human capabilities. The authors explore eight aspects of modern life, including health care, education, entertainment and employment, but specifically do not look at the issue of warfare. They said that military A.I. applications were outside their current scope and expertise, but they did not rule out focusing on weapons in the future.

The report also does not consider the belief of some computer specialists about the possibility of a “singularity” that might lead to machines that are more intelligent and possibly threaten humans.

“It was a conscious decision not to give credence to this in the report,” Dr. Stone said.

India rolls out world's first leprosy vaccine as fight goes on 'war footing'

Country is officially leprosy free, meaning the disease afflicts fewer than one in 10,000 people, but specialists say true infection rate is far higher
Rammurat, a 25-year-resident of Tahir Pur, who contracted leprosy when he was aged 14. He is one of 2,000 people living with the disease in the east Delhi colonies. Photograph: Michael Safi for the Guardian--The government has provided residents of Tahir Pur who have leprosy with hand-operated rickshaws. Some have lost tissue in their feet due to leprosy-related injuries. Photograph: Michael Safi for the Guardian
Children work packing balloons in Tahir Pur, home to the largest leprosy colonies in Asia Photograph: Michael Safi for the Guardian-- An aerial view of one of Tahir Pur’s 29 leprosy colonies in east Delhi. Spanning 74 acres, the colonies make up the largest leprosy complex in the world. Photograph: Michael Safi for the Guardian

Michael Safi in Delhi

The first lesions appeared on teenager Rammurat’s feet. To those in his village near Gorakhpur, in the vast Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, the cause of the pale sores was clear.

“Some said it was black magic. Some said it was the spirit of the dead catching us,” he recalls.

“What will people think? What will the neighbours think?” he wondered when finally diagnosed at a nearby mission hospital – too late to entirely save his feet. “People used to hate looking at a leprosy patient. You see a lady [with symptoms] coming into the village, they will run away.”

India is officially leprosy free, meaning the disease afflicts fewer than one in 10,000 people. But specialists understand the true infection rate to be far higher, and the disease is still endemic in some of the country’s poorest districts.

Today India accounts for more than 60% of the world’s new leprosy cases and health officials have quietly moved to a “war footing” against it, one senior researcher says.

This week the government announced a major step: the world’s first leprosy vaccine, developed in-country but tied up for years in testing, will be rolled out in Gujarat and Bihar, two states where the problem is sharpest.

Among the oldest recorded references to leprosy – the ulcers, the gnawing away of a fingers, eyes and noses – appear in 4,000-year-old Hindu epics, the disease christened kustha, Sanksrit for “eating away”.

Long associated with sin and contagion, one Vedic legend holds that even a king was banished after developing the telltale sores. Rammurat, a 14-year-old when his symptoms appeared, sought treatment, but stood no chance against the stigma.

Older now, Rammurat lives in a 30-hectare slum on Delhi’s north-eastern fringes. Rubbish collects in open sewers along the tight lanes of the neighbourhood and children mingle with tethered goats and chickens in the midday heat. It could be any poor community in the capital, but for the preponderance of wounds: missing toes, fingers, or entire limbs wrapped in white gauze.

Allotted to people with the disease a half-century ago, these blocks in Tahir Pur have grown into Asia’s largest leprosy colonies, home to 2,000 patients and their families, and a remnant of centuries of official policy to segregate them from the world. Rammurat arrived 25 years ago, seeking acceptance and access to treatment. “I moved here to save myself,” he says.

A few hundred metres away is the Leprosy Mission’s Delhi hospital, one of 14 specialist care centres the Christian group runs in India. Inside, hundreds crowd around waiting rooms and dispensary windows awaiting medicine, among them up to 150 leprosy patients each day.

It diagnoses on average one new case of the disease per day. “That’s alarming,” says Stephen Levi, the hospital’s superintendent. “And when we ask them to bring their other family members in, they don’t.”
Beside psalms and lists of symptoms on the hospital’s tiled walls there are, less congruously, pictures of the nine-banded armadillo: the north American mammal the only other species to naturally host leprosy, and a boon for researchers, who are still unable to grow the disease in labs.

For all the fear it conjures, leprosy, caused by the pathogen Mycobacterium leprae, has been effectively treatable since the 1940s. It isn’t particularly contagious either, its spread requiring regular contact with an untreated sufferer, and an immune system already compromised by genetics or poverty. Nor is it “flesh-eating” – limbs more likely to rot away because of injuries sustained by repeated use after the sensation of pain is lost.

“The real problem is the level of stigma,” says Dr Sunil Anand, the executive director of the Leprosy Mission. “Those who get leprosy tend to be ostracised and stigmatised by the community, they tend to hide away.”

That makes containing the disease, or treating it before disfigurement sets in, harder. “Discriminatory practices then come into play. Like schools not giving admission to children with leprosy, or from a leprosy family. It’s the same in jobs, even healthcare,” he says.
Advertisement

About 16 national Indian laws still discriminate against people with leprosy, he says, a legacy of the ancient aversion to the disease, but also an 1898 colonial law that segregated patients and prevented them having children, passed in response to British panic an epidemic would spread back home.

A eight-year treatment drive by the Indian government shrunk the number of new cases four-fold by 2005. That year the government celebrated the official elimination of the disease, meaning a rate of fewer than one in 10,000 new cases a year. “Maybe that’s possible,” Levi, the hospital superintendent, says of the official rate. “But only because India has such a huge population.”

One of India’s leading leprosy researchers, Dr Utpal Sengupta, is more sceptical. The elimination figure trumpeted by the government and World Health Organisation was produced “in a hurry”, the 75-year-old says from his office, a bobble-headed armadillo on the desk.

More recent leprosy surveys produced by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) have a much greater prevalence, he says, but the Indian government has declined to release the exact estimate. (A source with access to the research told the Guardian the research showed a national rate of “roughly five to six cases per 10,000”.)

Battling high rates, health officials are also racing against time: leprosy strains are slowly becoming resistant to the multi-drug therapy that so successfully brought the Indian infection rate crashing down.

“When there was a monotherapy, it took only 30 years for the disease to develop resistance,” Sengupta says. “And we are already seeing resistance cases [for the multi-drug therapy].”

The rollout of the vaccine, announced earlier this month, is part of a return to a “war footing” against the disease, he says. “The vaccine is the most important thing for elimination. It’s the best answer.”

Beginning in five hotspot districts in Bihar and Gujarat, the vaccine will be administered both to people with leprosy and those in close and regular contact with them, in combination with the antibiotic Rifampicin. Trials of the vaccine have shown it could bring existing rates down by 65% over three years, according to Dr Soumya Swaminathan, the director-general of the ICMR.

The rollout is accompanied by a new round of “active case detection” – health workers going house-to-house “to hopefully detect new leprosy cases which were undiagnosed in the community”. Fifty districts have already been swept, turning up 5,000 previously undetected cases.

“It’s a multi-pronged attack on leprosy, we’re looking to eliminate it” – a second time – “in the next five to 10 years,” Dr Swaminathan says.

That the vaccine is Indian-developed is also a source of pride. “It shows exactly how Indian research and development can solve our own problems,” she says.

In Delhi at least, efforts to remove the stigma around one of the world’s oldest diseases are also paying off – but not without cost.

As the capital expands, the giant leprosy colonies of Tahir Pur suddenly find themselves on prized land. Businesses are illegally setting up shop and developers are eyeing an area society once spurned. “Now, the non-leprosy people are trying to move in,” Levi says.

Thursday, September 1, 2016

Remembering the Krishanthi Kumaraswamy case



Featured image courtesy UK Tamil News

BHAGAVADAS SRISKANTHADAS on 09/01/2016
On the  7th of September 1996, around six in the morning, a girl in her late teens stood in front of the portrait of Goddess Saraswathie that was hanging askew on the wall. Here she stood erect, with closed eyes and clasped hands, in contemplation for a few minutes. There was a special reason for her to ask for favours from this Goddess on this particular day.
She was in the midst of the G.C.E (A/L) examination, and on this particular day in less than four hours she would be answering her Chemistry Multiple Choice paper. Needless to say among the pantheon of Hindu deities Saraswathie was identified since she was the Goddess of learning.
The girls name was Krishanthi Kumaraswamy and she attended Chundukuli Girls’ College, a prestigious school for girls, in Jaffna. On this morning her mother cobbled together a meal from what was available at that early hour. Krishanthi had only a small portion of the meal as she was never hungry enough for a full breakfast. Following breakfast the girl flicked through the notes, in condensed form, she had prepared for last minute revision. Around 7.15 a.m. the girl, attired in her white school uniform, red tie, socks and shoes took her red bicycle outside the house and walked towards the road, twenty meters from the house. Mother followed daughter up the road, wished her ‘good luck’ and watched her mount the bicycle and literally fly away, until she lost sight of the girl.
The name of the affectionate mother was Rasammah Kumaraswamy. She was 59 years of age and a graduate of a prominent Indian university. In 1996 she was serving as vice principal of a school at Kaithady, where her house was located. She was blessed with three
children. The eldest daughter, Prashanthi, was living in Colombo pursuing a course that would lead towards a professional qualification, her second daughter Krishanthi who was now in the midst of an examination; and the youngest Pranavan, a boy going on sixteen awaiting G.C.E (O/L) examination results. Rasammah became a widow in 1984 and to her, life had no purpose if not for these children.
That day when she lost sight of Krishanthi on her bicycle, Rasammah made a beeline to the Hindu temple a few metres away from her house. At the temple she made an offering that didn’t take much time. This was a Saturday, a nonworking day, the lady had plenty of time on her hands. On her way back from the temple she spent a few minutes at a fellow teacher’s house and around 8.15 a.m. left that place. Rasammah directly went home. She was fasting that morning, she did forgo her breakfast and the next meal for her would be lunch. This she would partake with Krishanthi and her son, who had gone to his private tutor’s residence.
Rasammah was aware that day her daughter’s examination was supposed to commence at 9.30 a.m. and finish by 11.30 a.m. Therefore, she anticipated that her daughter would arrive home by 12.30 p.m. or at the latest by one in the afternoon. In a jiffy she made an elaborate vegetarian lunch and waited for her daughter. As there was no sign of Krishanthi’s arrival or any explanation for the delay a twitchy mother kept walking, to and fro, between the house and the road. Rasammah expressed her concern to her elder sister, Sivapakiam, who lived alone next door and spent the night with her. In desperation the nonplussed mother came towards the gate and remained riveted to the spot with several thoughts crossing her mind.
This was the moment Kirubamoorthi, a person well known to Kumaraswamy family, came towards Rasammah and informed the dreadful news he had learnt from someone. The alarming news was that Krishanthi had been detained by the army at the Chemmani security check point. Grasping the gravity of the situation Rasammah decided to go in search of her daughter, without dilly-dallying, a decision chimed in by Kirubamoorthi. The boy, Pranavan,who arrived short time ago from the tutor’s residence, placed his mother on the pillion of his bicycle, and followed by Kirubamoorthi who was also on his bicycle, rode towards an army check point located in the vicinity of a cremation ground.
Neither Krishanthi nor the other three – mother, brother and Kirubamoorthi – returned to Kaithady that night.
Two relations of the Kumaraswamy family left Kaithady on the following morning to bring this to the notice of Chief Post Master, Jaffna, Kodeshwaran. Kodeshwaran was considered by the locals as a person who kept his ear to the ground. After listening to what the two from Kaithady stated Kodeshwaran felt in a situation of this nature the first port of call should be the nearest military camp. Therefore, these two persons accompanied by Kodeshwaran, went to the Pungankulam military camp and made a complaint about the missing persons. This was done within 24 hours of Krishanthi’s detention.
The post master, also being a kinsman of the Kumaraswamy family, strained every nerve and sinew to find out what exactly happened to Krishanthi and the three who went in search of her. The army officers from Jaffna, maintained that the ‘soldiers knew nothing of the disappearance’. Kodeshwaran also spoke to the police and got a nephew of his to provide the police information about sighting the bicycle chain cover of Pranavan – the school boy, who went with the others in search of his sister. The post master’s nephew had seen this chain cover at a cycle repair shop close to the Chemmani military check point.
At the time when these persons went missing Jaffna was under direct control of the military.
The area was a tightly knit network of a myriad of check points and camps. Therefore it remained baffling as to why the local security personnel allowed this to remain shrouded in mystery for more than a month.
National newspapers didn’t bother to even report this matter. To journalists associated with the national media writing anything against the military establishment would be tantamount to an ‘unpatriotic’ act.
With nothing positive being heard from Jaffna Mr.T. Poopalan, an unswerving human rights lawyer from Colombo, did whatever possible to highlight the incident. He contacted a Member of Parliament, Joseph Pararajasingham, to raise the matter in Parliament. Poopalan also contacted several important persons including the President Mrs Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaranatunga. The President, naturally, shocked by what she heard, ordered the authorities to conduct an investigation immediately and bring the miscreants to book.
Following directions from the President a military police investigation unit headed by Lt.Col. Gunaratne was sent to Jaffna. Though most of those served at the Chemmani post, on the day Krishanthi went missing were deployed elsewhere, they were brought to Jaffna for interrogation.
Many of them admitted to raping the school girl. They also admitted killing Krishanthi, Rasamma, Pranavan and Kirubamoorthi. Based on the information elicited from them, 45 days after the persons went missing, in the presence of the local Magistrate all four bodies were exhumed, a few metres away from the Chemmani check point where Krishanthi was detained. Subsequent to exhumation, all persons arrested including the Lance Corporal in charge of the check point were taken to Colombo.
Based on the evidence gathered Attorney General indicted these military and police personnel before a three member High court Bench. The trial at bar comprised of Judges Nimal Disanayake (president), Andrew Somawansa and Gamini Abeyratne. At the trial it

came to light most of the accused persons gang raped and killed the school girl. It also came to light that these criminal elements by killing the other three persons thought they erred on the side of caution by obliterating any trace of evidence, a ploy frequently attributed in Sri
Lanka to military establishment to cover wrong doing.
This complex trial lasted several months and at the end Judges found five soldiers and a police constable guilty of a several charges including rape and murder. Some government politicians of that period hailed the outcome of the trial as a commitment on their part to human rights and rule of law. However the disappearance of Krishanthi and others wouldn’t have been investigated if not for President  Kumaratunga’s directions.
Ironically,the slaughter of 25 Tamils following the soldiers going on a shooting spree atKumarapuram, six months prior to Krishanthi’s disappearance, didn’t receive the same attention. While the Chemmani trial concluded within two years of the incident, the Kumarapuram trial, in contrast, took twenty years. The inordinate delay reminds one of the often quoted maxim “Justice delayed is justice denied.”