Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, August 12, 2016

There Are No Successful Black Nations

And the indignity and helplessness of blacks in America won’t end until we have a first-world African nation to lift up our people.
There Are No Successful Black Nations

BY CHIGOZIE OBIOMA-AUGUST 9, 2016


In the wake of fresh deaths at the hands of police officers in the world’s greatest nation, we, the people of the black race, are once again the object of renewed worldwide attention.

Questions of injustice in the United States have been duly raised and protested. And, once again, the black cultural elites in America have seized various platforms to air their grievances and are mostly — and rightly — talking about racism, discrimination, racial profiling, and hate, among other issues. But one issue that has hardly been talked about is the core reason why black people have remained synonymous with the denigrating experience of racism. It is, I dare say, because of the worldwide indignity of the black race.

Racism is not limited to the Unites States. There is no nonblack nation, even among the most liberal ones, where the black man is dignified. History dealt us an unforgiving blow in the incursion of foreigners into black lands. The Arabs enslaved tribes and nations and then colonized and evangelized them. Then came the Europeans, who, persuaded the Africans were of an inferior race, divided up the continent over lunch in Berlin in 1884. They carted off a large population of its people — sometimes leaving entire villages almost empty — and brought those who remained on the continent under their rule. So complete was the transformation that no black nation retained its ancestral nationhood, national language, or national identity. And today we often hear of how China or India or some other nation is “taking over” Africa economically. There is almost no nation whose majority is of a different race that has not spat on the face of the black person, at one time or the other.

Be assured, the indignity will continue. Black elites and activists across the world have adopted a culture of verbal tyranny in which they shut down any effort to reason or criticize us or black-majority nations by labeling such attempts as “racism” or “hate speech.” Thus, one can be certain that any suggestions that our race may indeed need to do something to remedy our situation will not be aired — not by the terrified people of other races. And anyone within our race who makes such a suggestion will be deemed weak and pandering or a sellout, as U.S. President Barack Obama has been repeatedly called.Thus, no one will talk about the painful fact that most African and Caribbean nations have either failed or are about to collapse.

Early African-American intellectuals and cultural elites saw that the future of their race could not be advanced by endless protests or marches of “equality” or “justice.” It could only be done through the restoration of the trampled dignity of the black man. Great men like Marcus Garvey, W. E. B. Du Bois, and Malcolm X all knew that a people is only respected when it has a nation worthy of respect. A man who lives in a shack cannot expect to be treated with respect at a palace. They knew that for us to reclaim power we must first reclaim dignity and that this comes through the construction of a solid black state with a demonstrable level of development and prosperity — and which can stand as a powerful advocate for the global black.

Today, no such state exists.

Nigeria, the most populous black nation on Earth, is on the brink of collapse. The machineries that make a nation exist, let alone succeed, have all eroded. One might argue that the nation’s creation by self-seeking white imperialists engendered its failure from the beginning, as I did in my recent novel. But this is only a part of the cause. A culture of incompetence, endemic corruption, dignified ineptitude, and, chief among all, destructive selfishness and greed has played a major role in its unravelling. The same, sadly, can be said for most other African nations. States like Zimbabwe, Cameroon, and Equatorial Guinea are farcical democracies ruled by men who exclusively cater to their interests and those of their clipped circles.

Thus, it is no surprise that in the absence of any healthy black nation — in the midst of chaos, senseless wars, corrupted religiosity, violence, and economic collapse — African and Caribbean people leave home en masse. They beg on the streets of Greece, prostitute in the red-light zones of the Netherlands, and make up 40 percent of the migrants flocking to Europe. As they turn up in these countries, helpless, unwanted, starved, or maimed, they are treated like dogs. Last month in Italy, a newly married Nigerian man was murdered simply for being unwanted. Everywhere from Ukraine to India, nearly every day, black indignity, black helplessness, stares us in the face. And all we do, we who hold the platform can do, is scream “racism!” and court the sympathy of others.

The Yoruba say, “Eniyan bi aparo ni omo araye n’fe,” meaning the world loves a person who is like a partridge. The partridge is a poor bird that, enfeebled by its creation, has little ability to hunt, gather, protect, or feed itself. The Yoruba believe that the world loves these birds because they provide the space for people to show both sincere and insincere sympathy while holding firm to their position as the superior and maintaining the place of the partridge as the weak. Which is to say that if the partridge relies on the sympathy of others, it will not elevate its position. If we, black people everywhere, cannot gather the resources within our powers to exert real changes and restore our dignity, we will continue to be seen as weak. Our protestations and grievances will be met with sympathy, which does nothing to inspire respect.

Black elites should allow for self-criticism and soul-searching and for the restoration of the Pan-Africanist movement with an eye toward building sustainable black nations. We must come to realize that to a great extent the fate of the black man in America is inextricably linked to that of his brother in Africa. Although largely unacknowledged in American political discourse, Jim Crow ended in part because of the African Independent movements. Jaja Nwachukwu, a 1960s-era Nigerian foreign minister and avowed Pan-Africanist who was close friends with American Presidents Dwight Eisenhower and Lyndon Johnson, once recalled how American officials were embarrassed when African ministers attended official events in New York’s U.N. headquarters and were treated with honor as representatives of sovereign countries.
They were ashamed, for instance, when American blacks could not use the same bathroom as the Africans, just as black. The American blacks were further empowered when African nations started becoming independent, black-governed nation-states, beginning with Ghana in 1957 and followed shortly afterward by other African nations.

As long as we continue to ignore Africa’s continuous wallowing in senseless poverty and destructive failures, as long as the Congolese or the Haitian remains the poster child for poverty and lack, we will remain undignified. As long as we continue to ignore our own self-assessment and soul-searching, we will remain the undignified race. Sadig Rasheed, one of the leading African politicians of the 1980s, once told Polish journalist Ryszard Kapuscinski: “I worry about whether African societies will be able to assume a self-critical stance, and much depends on this.” I add: Our dignity — and even survival — will depend on this.

Photo credit: MAHMUD TURKIA/AFP/Getty Images

Russia’s Weakness Is Its Economic Policy

moscow_economic

Self-sufficiency means not being import dependent or dependent on foreign capital for investment that could be financed by Russia’s central bank. It also means strategic parts of the economy remaining in public, not private, hands. Basic infrastructure services should be provided to the economy at cost, on a subsidized basis or freely, not turned over to foreign owners to extract monopoly rent.

by Paul Craig Roberts and Michael Hudson

( August 11, 2016, Washington DC, Sri Lanka Guardian) According to various reports, the Russian government is reconsidering the neoliberal policy that has served Russia so badly since the collapse of the Soviet Union. If Russia had adopted an intelligent economic policy, Russia’s economy would be far ahead of where it stands today. It would have avoided most of the capital flight to the West by relying on self-finance.

Washington, however, took advantage of a naive, gullible and demoralized Russian government which looked to Washington for guidance in the post-Soviet era. Russians thought that the rivalry between the two countries had ended with the Soviet collapse and trusted American advice to modernize the Russian economy with best-practice Western ideas. Instead, Washington abused this trust to saddle Russia with an economic policy designed to carve up Russian economic assets and transfer ownership into foreign hands. By tricking Russia into accepting foreign capital and exposing the ruble to currency speculation, Washington made sure that the US could destabalize Russia with capital outflows and assaults on the ruble’s exchange value. Only a government unfamiliar with the neoconservative aim of US world hegemony would have exposed its economic system to such foreign manipulation.

The sanctions that Washington imposed – and forced Europe to impose – on Russia show how neoliberal economics works against Russia. The policy’s call for high interest rates and austerity sank the Russian economy – needlessly. The ruble was knocked down by capital outflows, resulting in the neoliberal central bank squandering Russia’s foreign reserves in an effort to support the ruble but actually supported capital flight.

Even Vladimir Putin finds attractive the romantic notion of a global economy to which every country has equal access. But the problems resulting from neoliberal policy forced him to turn to import substitution in order to make the Russian economy less dependent on imports. It also made Putin realize that if Russia were to have one foot in the Western economic order, it needed to have the other foot in the new economic order being constructed with China, India, and former central Asian Soviet republics.

Neoliberal economics prescribes a dependency policy that relies on foreign loans and foreign investment. This policy creates foreign currency debt and foreign ownership of Russian profits. These are dangerous vulnerabilities for a nation declared by Washington to be “an existential threat to the US.”

The economic establishment that Washington set up for Russia is neoliberal. The head of the central bank Elvira Nabiullina, minister of economic development Alexei Ulyukayev, and the current and former finance ministers, Anton Siluanov and Alexei Kudrin, are doctrinaire neoliberals. This crowd wanted to deal with Russia’s budget deficit by selling public assets to foreigners. If actually carried through, this policy would give Washington more control over Russia’s economy.

Opposed to this collection of “junk economists,” stands Sergey Glaziev. Boris Titov and Andrei Klepach are reported to be his allies.

This group understands that neoliberal policies make Russia’s economy susceptible to destabilization by Washington if the US wants to punish the Russian government for not following Washington’s foreign policy. Their aim is to promote a more self-sufficient Russia in order to protect the nation’s sovereignty and the government’s ability to act in Russia’s national interests rather than subjugate these interests to those of Washington. The neoliberal model is not a development model, but is purely extractive. Americans have characterized it as making Russia or other dependencies “hewers of wood and drawers of water” – or in Russia’s case, oil, gas, platinum and diamonds.

Self-sufficiency means not being import dependent or dependent on foreign capital for investment that could be financed by Russia’s central bank. It also means strategic parts of the economy remaining in public, not private, hands. Basic infrastructure services should be provided to the economy at cost, on a subsidized basis or freely, not turned over to foreign owners to extract monopoly rent. Glaziev also wants the ruble’s exchange value to be set by the central bank, not by speculators in the currency market.

Neoliberal economists do not acknowledge that the economic development of a nation with natural resource endowments such as Russia has can be financed by the central bank creating the money required to undertake the projects. They pretend that this would be inflationary. Neoliberals deny the long-recognized fact that, in terms of the quantity of money, it makes no difference whether the money comes from the central bank or from private banks creating money by making loans or from abroad. The difference is that if money comes from private banks or from abroad, interest must be paid to the banks, and profits have to be shared with foreign investors, who end up with some control over the economy.

Apparently, Russia’s neoliberals are insensitive to the threat that Washington and its European vassals pose to the Russian state. On the basis of lies Washington has imposed economic sanctions on Russia. This political demonization is as fictitious as is the neoliberal economic propaganda. On the basis of such lies, Washington is building up military forces and missile bases on Russia’s borders and in Russian waters. Washington seeks to overthrow former Russian or Soviet provinces and install regimes hostile to Russia, as in Ukraine and Georgia. Russia is continually demonized by Washington and NATO. Washington even politicized the Olympic games and prevented the participation of many Russian athletes.

Despite these overt hostile moves against Russia, Russian neoliberals still believe that the economic policies that Washington urges on Russia are in Russia’s interest, not intended to gain control of its economy. Hooking Russia’s fate to Western hegemony under these conditions would doom Russian sovereignty.

French court rejects bid to demolish shops at Jungle refugee camp

Lille court rules there is no legal basis for expelling 72 people running makeshift stores and cafes at Calais camp
 The Calais prefect’s office said makesift premises should be demolished because they did not pay tax. Photograph: Philippe Huguen/AFP/Getty Images
 in Paris-Friday 12 August 2016
A French court has rejected a bid by Calais authorities to demolish dozens of makeshift shops and restaurants in the Jungle camp where thousands of refugeesare living.
At a court hearing this week, Calais authorities had argued the state should be able to knock down a total of 72 makeshift shops where people inside the camp sell goods, from cigarettes to energy drinks, offer haircuts, or sell tea for 50 cents (40p) or basic meals for a few euros in makeshift restaurants.
The Calais prefect’s office argued the places should be demolished because they represented a parallel economy that did not pay tax, and because they carried fire and sanitation risks.
Humanitarian groups had told the court the shops and restaurants were vital, saying the free meals offered by a state-backed association and other groups did not provide enough food for the growing numbers at the camp. They argued the makeshift shops and restaurants often provided shelter and free meals to those in need.
A Lille court ruled there was no legal basis for expelling the people running the 72 makeshift shops, but said the Calais prefect’s concerns “were totally understandable”.
The judge, Jean-François Molla, said the groceries, cafes and restaurants played a much bigger role than simply feeding people that “live in extremely precarious conditions”. He said the spaces provided calm meeting points between refugees and volunteers.
One of the places that had been under threat from demolition was the camp’s Jungle Book Kids’ Cafe which is run not-for-profit and provides 200 meals a day, English and French classes, and asylum advice for the hundreds of vulnerable unaccompanied minors in the camp.
More than 170,000 people have signed a petition to protect the kids’ cafe. A letter sent to the Guardian said its closure “would be a catastrophe for these children, some of whom are as young as eight”.
Two charities, Help Refugees and L’Auberge des Migrants, on Friday estimated that numbers in the Jungle camp have risen to over 9,000 people – the highest ever – after a steep increase in arrivals during the summer.

Think women with cancer don't care about make-up? 100,000 of us will tell you otherwise

Look Good, Feel Better offers make-up masterclasses to women with cancer
Look Good, Feel Better offers make-up masterclasses to women with cancerLauren Kett, 20, is undergoing treatment for Hodgkins Lymphoma
LGFB workshop: Lauren Kett, 20, is undergoing treatment for Hodgkins Lymphoma 

The Telegraph By 12 AUGUST 2016

Amidst the laughter and chatter, a very serious conversation is going on – and it concerns the validity of blue mascara.

“It’s a little bit Eighties, isn’t it?” says one girl. “I’m not keen on bronzer,” another whispers dejectedly as she rummages through her make-up bag.

Vanity mirrors are eagerly tweaked; cotton wool excitedly dabbed onto cheekbones.

“Has everyone got magnificent eyebrows now?” make-up artist, Becky, hollers above the buzz.

Looking on, it would be easy to mistake this busy salon for any number of high street beauty parlours in London. It’s only when a chemotherapy drip beeps and a headscarf-wearing girl rushes past, that reality hits home. This isn’t a department store cosmetics counter: every young woman here is coping with a life changing disease. We’re on the third floor of University College Hospital, in an outpatient facility for 13 to 24-year-olds at the Macmillan Cancer Centre.

It’s with thanks to the efforts of non-profit organisation Look Good, Feel Better (LGFB) that 14 teen patients are enjoying a two hour pampering session in between their treatment: swapping Max Factor products, chatting about their exams and generally having a laugh.
Surprisingly, LGFB is the only international cancer charity that provides practical support for women and teenage girls suffering from the visible side effects of cancer treatment. And since it gained charitable status in 1993, it’s helped over 100,000 of them via free skincare and make-up masterclasses here in the UK.

LGFB’s teenage workshops launched in 2001 and they run more than 50 each year. Today is the first time it’s come to the Teenage Cancer Trust hub here at University College Hospital – suffice to say most of the girls couldn’t wait to sign up.

Seventeen-year-old Georgina is one of them. It’s been nearly three years since she was diagnosed with desmoplastic small round cell tumour sarcoma - a rare and highly aggressive pediatric cancer that usually arises in the abdomen but can spread to the lungs, liver and bones. This is her fourth round of chemo. Despite admitting it was “pretty scary when they told me I probably wasn’t going to make it,” she shares her story with humour, positivity and grace.

I’ve never forgotten the impact cancer had on my self-confidence at such an impressionable age

“I’ve always been quite a positive person – it hasn’t really changed. In fact, it’s made me more like that,” she grins. “A lot of people are quite shocked by that. But all of my friends say they forget that I have cancer because I’m so normal all of the time.”

Georgina decided to cut all her hair off before she started treatment, although she wasn’t too upset about it – “hair isn’t everything and it grows back”. Despite that, adjusting was tough.

“My hair was down to my bum. I had thick hair all my life,” she explains. “So, to go from that to no hair was really strange. I was always really good with plaiting. That was disappointing.”

When I tell her she seems pretty nifty at headscarf styling she laughs. “Loads of people come up to me and tell me they love the way I do my headscarves!”

As Teenage Cancer Trust youth support co-ordinator Sarah Smith explains, hair loss – including eyebrows and eyelashes - is often the hardest thing for women and girls to deal with.

Sarah is here every day, “keeping them out of trouble” and helping them develop coping mechanisms, so that they can better deal with their diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.

“Doing something like this – it’s investing in how they look, their self-worth. And it’s not just about the make-up, is it?” Sarah explains. “It’s about pampering yourself and making yourself feel a bit better. I think it’s vital. It makes them feel special. They can go back to their friends and talk about something that isn’t chemo.”

“When you look yourself, you feel yourself,” LGFB volunteer Becky tells me towards the end of her make-up demo on the young adult ward. She is just one of 2,000 volunteer beauty consultants who work alongside LGFB - and speaks from personal experience.

They can go back to their friends and talk about something that isn’t chemoSarah Smith

Recently diagnosed, Becky has taken time out from her own cancer treatment, keen to pass on her beauty tips to the girls being treated here - such as lip-liner and moisturising techniques to help combat the drying side-effects of chemotherapy.

Her words hit home for me, too. I first came across a LGFB leaflet at one of my annual check-ups last month. It’s been 14 years since I was diagnosed with thyroid cancer at the age of 19; and 13 years since I was cured.

Despite this, I’ve never quite forgotten the impact it had on my self-confidence at such an impressionable age. For a long time afterwards I questioned who I was and what I saw when I looked in the mirror. It permeates a person. It changes you. That’s why alternative care and support like this really matters.

A quote pinned onto the hub’s motivational wall catches my eye: “Live life with no limits.” I’m immediately reminded of Georgina. I watch as she disappears down the corridor - chemo trolley in one hand, make-up bag in the other. Laughing and waving as she goes.

Thursday, August 11, 2016

Why do we need foreign judges?


DR.Vickramabahu Karunaratne -2016-08-11

Chief Minister of the Northern Province C.V. Wigneswaran is a sharp campaigner. Like many other campaigners for justice he too tends to come out with extreme statements; often to drive home a point. Rather than getting muddled up in the irreconcilable statements he makes it is really necessary to understand the injustice he is exposing. Recently Wigneswaran has said that accountability for the war crimes allegedly committed in the last phase of the anti-LTTE war must be established before the Sri Lankan Government formulates a new Constitution to address the basic political question. 

Addressing the Tamil People's Council in his capacity as its co-chairman in Jaffna, Wigneswaran said that the Constitution planned by the government will not be drafted to the Tamils' satisfaction unless accountability issues were satisfactorily addressed prior to that. Apparently he had heard from someone involved in the Constitution-making exercise that the government is planning to brush accountability under the carpet by showing the international community that it is seriously working on a new Constitution to address the political grievances of the Tamils. The plan is to get the new Constitution passed by the March session of the UNHRC. By doing so, the government hopes that it can divert attention from the accountability issue and urge the Tamils to look to the future rather than look back at the past. Well, what is more important, looking to the future or investigating the crimes of the past? Mandela was eager to go forward to democracy and freedom rather than punishing political criminals.

Mara Ugula
Many people believe that the Constitution-making exercise is easy and it can be done with the majority in the Parliament. On the contrary the Joint Opposition is claiming the new Constitution will be the death knell of the Sinhala people. This is their main attack on the government. They claim that the Maithri-Ranil Government is betraying the Sinhala war heroes who died for a unitary Sinhala country. Wimal says it is a Mara Ugula, the death trap for the Sinhala patriots. War crimes are secondary in the agenda of the Sinhala chauvinists. The majority of Sinhala military women and men believe that those who committed war crimes are bringing shame to the forces, and what they did was fighting an enemy as a patriotic act. Even though not claimed to be war crimes, the killing of Lasantha, Ekneligoda, Raviraj and others was done by the military people under the cover of war. The victims were all pro-Tamil liberation people. But the Sinhala masses are eagerly waiting to hear the punishments for these killings.

Wigneswaran says that it is essential for any Sinhala-dominated government in Sri Lanka not to be seen letting down the predominantly Sinhala armed forces. Therefore, every effort will be made to dodge the issue of accountability or water down the accountability process. This thinking is closer to the vision of Mahinda Raj. Mahinda argued that being the hero of the Sinhala people after defeating the separatist Tamil liberators he could continue indefinitely on the Sinhala majority vote. This thinking collapsed like a house of cards. So, Wigneswaran is also using flimsy arguments. We must investigate war crimes. Why do we need foreign judges? We have independent minded among both Tamils and Sinhala people. To my knowledge Wigneswaran was an independent judge. So why do we look elsewhere? We have enough resources here. 

மஹிந்தவின் மகன் என்று கூறியவரை எவ்வாறு நம்புவது?: சபையில் த.தே.கூ.

Published by MD.Lucias on 2016-08
முன்னாள் ஜனாதிபதி மஹிந்த ராஜபக் ஷவின் ஆட்சியில் மகிந்தவின் மகன் என தன்னை கூறிக்கொண்டிருந்தவரும், நீதிமன்றத்தை அச்சுறுத்தியவருமான அமைச்சர்   ரிசாத் பதியூதீன்  அங்கம் வகிக்கும்  வடமாகாணத்திற்கான மீள்குடியேற்றச்  செயலணியின் மீது எவ்வாறு நம்பிக்கை கொள்ள முடியுமென தமிழ்த்தேசியக் கூட்டமைப்பு கேள்வியெழுப்பி உள்ளது. 
பாராளுமன்றத்தில் நேற்று புதன்கிழமை பிரதமரிடத்திலான கேள்வி நேரத்தின் போது  தமிழ்த் தேசியக் கூட்டமைப்பின்  வன்னி மாவட்ட பாராளுமன்ற உறுப்பினர்  சார்ள்ஸ்  நிர்மலநாதன்  வடமாகாண மீள்குடியேற்றச்  செயலணியில் வடமாகாண முதலமைச்சர் சி.வி.விக்னேஸ்வரன்,  வடமாகாண தமிழ்த் தேசியக் கூட்டமைப்பின் மக்கள் பிரதிநிதிகள் உள்ளடக்கப்படாமைக்கான காரணம்  என்ன என கேள்வியெழுப்பினர். 
தொடர்ந்து வடமாகாண மக்கள் வடமாகாண சபையும், தம்மால் அதிகளவு  வாக்குகள் அளித்து பாராளுமன்றத்திற்கு தெரிவு செய்யப்பட்ட தமிழ்த் தேசியக் கூட்டமைப்பின் மக்கள் பிரதிநிதிகளையுமே அதிகம் நம்பியிருக்கின்றார்கள். அவ்வாறிருக்கையில்  அந்த மக்களின் சார்பில் ஒருவரையேனும்   அந்த செயலணியில் உள்வாங்காமல்   இருப்பதானது எமக்கு சந்தேகத்தை ஏற்படுத்துவதாகவே உள்ளது.  இதில்  வெவ்வேறு உள்நோக்கம்  காணப்படுகின்றன என்ற ஐயப்பாடும் மக்கள் மத்தியில்  எமக்கு எழுகின்றது. 
மேலும்  முன்னாள் ஜனாதிபதி  மஹிந்த ராஜபக் ஷவின் ஆட்சிக்காலத்தில் தன்னை மஹிந்தவின் மகன் என கூறியவரும்  நீதிமன்றத்திற்கு கல்லெறிந்து அச்சுறுத்தல் விடுத்தவரும் தற்போது நிதிமோசடி தொடர்பான குற்றப்புலனாய்வு பிரிவில் வழக்கு  காணப்படும் அமைச்சருமான   ரிஷாட் பதியுதீன் இந்த செயலணியில் காணப்படுகின்றார். அவ்வாறான ஒருவர் அங்கம் வகிக்கும் செயலணி எவ்வாறு பக்கச்சார்பின்றி செயற்படும் என நம்பிக்கை கொள்ள  முடியும். ஆகவே வடமாகாணத்திற்கான மீள்குடியேற்ற செயலணியில் வடமாகாண முதலமைச்சரையும் உள்வாங்க வேண்டும் என வலியுறுத்தினார்.

All We Want Is Peace – Sivakkolunthu Agilathas

by Thushari Nathaniel-Thursday, August 11, 2016

Northern Provincial Councillor (NPC) Sivakkolunthu Agilathas claims that the Northern people are not in the least interested in protests and demonstrations to topple the government. He further said the new good governance regime have not been given the space to make a difference in the country. In an interview with The Sunday Leader he said that reconciliation should be a two-way street. He went on saying that although he was a Tamil from the North, he was saddened to see the Tamil people wanting benefits from the government, yet slandering people of the south the moment they (Tamil people) have received what they want. This, he said, should not be promoted if true reconciliation is to happen.

Following are excerpts of the interview:

Q: What is your view on Jana Satana Paada Yathra that the Joint Opposition staged?

A: As far as the Tamil people are concerned, no one cares about these protests. I think that staging these paada yathras will serve no purpose. This will not provide solutions to any of the issues that the people are facing now. The SLFP and the UNP are jointly in this government now; so, they should put aside the minor differences and try to work together to take this country forward. There is no purpose in one party trying to bring down the other at every opportunity they get.

The people now enjoy complete freedom. Hence, this sort of activities should not be done. All of us must try to support the government and allow them to serve the country better in their period. They have been elected by the people and others should respect that decision and give them the space to carry on their services during this period.

Q: There are allegations that the Joint Opposition Paada Yathra behaved unacceptably in front of the SLFP office and also condemned the President. What do you think of this behaviour?

A: That was very wrong. Even if a principle is changed at a school and appointed a new, its children have to study under the new principle. Similarly, even though the head of the SLFP has changed, its members should have had some respect for the party. Shouting slogans and hooting in front of the SLFP office is not acceptable, we cannot condone it.

Q: Some NPC members too are criticizing the government. They feel that they have failed the Tamil people. Do you agree with this claim?

A: No. I believe that the government under President Maithripala Sirisena has done a commendable job so far. Nothing can be done overnight. We all have to give this government enough time to deliver on their promises. We cannot expect instant results. The president is laying the foundation for long-term benefits, and we will only be able to reap them in the future. So, we need to be patient and help this government take forward their plans, instead of trying to destabilise them at every turn.

Q: This is not the view of the entire NPC. TNA too believes that the government has failed the Tamil people. What is your view on their claim?

A: No, I don’t agree. Even TNA expects the government to resolve all the issues within three months, which is impossible. Also expecting so is unrealistic. We cannot expect solutions to problems that have been festering for the past 30 years in just one year. We need to give the central government enough time to resolve these issues.

Q: Recent incident at Jaffna University raised concerns amongst people that racial tensions were still quite evident despite efforts made for reconciliation. What is your view on this development?

A:  I think that was ignited by some political hand. I admit that there were some shortcomings on the part of the administration. They had not programmed the agenda properly.

I don’t see any harm in allowing Kandyan dancers to perform at Jaffna University. Tamil dances are performed in the south regularly and the Sinhalese people have no issue with them. So, I don’t think that the Tamils should have any concerns or objections to a Sinhala dance being performed in Jaffna.

We need to put aside all these racial thoughts and try to live in this country as Sri Lankans irrespective of our race or religion. Not only the Tamils, but the Sinhalese also have their own culture and they (Tamil people) should respect that right.

This was a minor incident and it should not have been blown out of proportion. The new NPC governor is doing a great job, and we are very happy with his efforts. We as Tamils cannot only expect benefits from the Sinhalese people and then treat them badly. We too must learn to accept them and be more understanding. Reconciliation should work both ways and cannot only be restricted to the Sinhalese. We Tamils should also make an effort.

Even the Tamil newspapers in Jaffna exaggerated the whole issue.

Q: What is your view on the military presence in the North?

A: The people in the North are not demanding for the removal of the military in the North; it’s the politicians that want the removal. During floods and even during the tsunami and beyond, we wanted the military to come and help us. However, when the Tamil politicians poison people’s mind of the North, they demand that the military be removed. This is unfair. Just as we take their help, we should also be grateful to them and treat them well.

In fact, the military now does not come out of the camps. Now there are lots of incidents taking place here because local boys are out of control. If not for the military, these locals will steal most of the Tamil people’s jewellery and valuables. This situation is controlled to some extent only because of the military presence. The people are now beginning to understand the truth.

They want to live in harmony, but TNA is instigating hatred. The Tamil people want to live peacefully with the rest of the country. We have suffered enough due to the war and now all we want is peace.
Accountability issues: Govt. to set up judicial mechanism

2016-08-11

In the wake of the Office of Missing Persons Bill being passed in Parliament, Foreign Affairs Minister Mangala Samaraweera said the Government would go ahead with the setting up of a judicial mechanism to hear accountability issues. 

He said the new legislation would provide for the setting up of a Truth Commission next month to ascertain the circumstances under which people went missing. 

Addressing a hurriedly summoned news conference, the minister said the new legislation fulfilled the commitment made to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and was in line with the mandate received by President Maithripala Sirisena.

 He said there were conflicting figures with regard to the number of people gone missing under various circumstances and that it was important to confirm the actual number. The minister said the ICRC, in its latest report, had placed the number at 16,008, the UN Working Group on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances at 12,000 and the Paranagama Commission at 24,000.

  Of the number mentioned by the UN Working Group, he said 5,100 were from the security forces.

 "This is not a judicial mechanism. It is a truth seeking mechanism. It will trace the fate of those who went missing and the circumstances in which it happened," the minister said adding that the Office of Missing Persons would recommend measures to avoid disappearances in the future.

 He said funds would be raised from internal and external sources and the latter would be channeled through the External Resources Department of the Central Bank. He said foreign experts might be consulted by the OMP when carrying out its duties and pointed out that it would have accesses to any of the detention centres without prior notice. 

The minister said an amendment by the JVP to notify the police within 48 hours after such a visit was incorporated in the Bill and added that one of the clauses provided for the protection of confidentiality of those giving information. (Kelum Bandara and Yohan Perera) 

Interim Report: Consultation Task Force on Reconciliation Mechanisms


Photo courtesy CTF

 
  1. Access the complete report here or read it embedded below.
  2. Access the Executive Summary as a PDF here.
  3. Access the concluding observations of the CTF as a PDF here.
  4. Access a summary of actions recommended in the submissions to the CTF here.
###
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
of
INTERIM REPORT
The Office on Missing Persons Bill  and Issues Concerning the Missing, the Disappeared and the Surrendered
This interim report is based on all written submissions received as at 17th July 2016 and consultations conducted as at 8th August 2016.
###
The Consultation Task Force on Reconciliation Mechanisms (CTF) was appointed by the Prime Minister in January 2016 to conduct public consultations on the design of four mechanisms to advance truth, justice and reconciliation in Sri Lanka. These four mechanisms are: 1.) an Office on Missing Persons, 2.) an Office for Reparations, 3.) a Judicial Mechanism with a Special Counsel, and 4.) a Truth, Justice, Reconciliation and Non-Recurrence Commission. Apart from this, the CTF also welcomed submissions on alternative suggestions related to the four pillars of transitional justice (TJ). Zonal Task Forces (ZTFs) were established island-wide to conduct consultations in 15 zones. Two panels—a Panel of Experts and a Panel of National Representatives—were also appointed to contribute in an advisory capacity to the CTF.

Reconciliation Efforts Face Minor Setbacks

Political prisoners (file picture)

 by Easwaran Rutnam-Thursday, August 11, 2016

Sri Lanka’s efforts towards reconciliation is facing minor setbacks with Tamils in the North losing patience on some issues.

The latest is the political prisoner issue which is back in the spotlight with the prisoners saying they will commence a hunger strike tomorrow.

The political prisoners had staged a similar hunger strike in December last year but the strike was later suspended following assurances given by the government.

Some of the prisoners were released in stages but most of them are still in prison in jails around the country.

The prisoners have handed over a letter to the Prisons department indicating the decision to stage the fast.

The prisoners have stated that if there is to be true reconciliation the political prisoners must be freed.
The other issue is on missing persons and the establishment of the Office on Missing Persons (OMP).
Families of those missing are concerned over the delay to address the issue despite assurance given by the government to the international community.

An island-wide assessment conducted by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has also found that families of missing persons have many needs, years after the end of the conflict.

The survey found that these families primarily want to know the fate and whereabouts of their missing relatives and that they also face economic, legal and administrative difficulties in their daily lives.

Between October 2014 and November 2015, the ICRC met with 395 families of missing persons, including those of missing security forces and police personnel, in all 25 districts of the country. The findings of the assessment and recommendations were presented to the government.

“We believe these findings and recommendations can contribute to the development of a comprehensive response to the needs of all families of missing persons”,  Claire Meytraud, Head of the ICRC delegation in Sri Lanka said.

The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) said that the bill on the establishment of the OMP has prompted a number of debates among victims and civil society over outstanding issues, a few of which we address below.

CPA says although there is some disagreement amongst              non governmental and survivors’ organisations over specific provisions           of the bill, there is a broad consensus that victims belong at the center of the OMP’s work and that a victim centered approach is critical.

“The victim’s rights to truth and justice must be its animating principles. Thus, the OMP must have a primarily humanitarian mandate to ensure families’ right to know, with safeguards in place to ensure there is no undermining of future efforts to hold perpetrators accountable—through either a special court or the existing criminal justice system. In this regard, the OMP must have coherent and clear working methods, ensuring that steps are taken at the outset to reduce any tensions between humanitarian and prosecutorial goals,” CPA said.

CPA also notes concerns raised about possible tradeoffs between truth and justice and the need to address these issues.

The OMP has a broad mandate, outlined in Clause 10 of the bill. The primary mandate appears to be that of searching for and tracing missing persons and identifying appropriate mechanisms for the same, and of clarifying the circumstances in which such persons went missing. Other aspects of the OMP mandate include making recommendations to relevant authorities to address the incidence of missing persons, protecting the interests of missing persons and their relatives, identifying avenues of redress available to missing persons and their relatives and informing them of same, and collating data related to missing persons from previous processes carried out by other entities and establishing a centralised database. 

Unlike previous mechanisms, the mandate of the OMP covers all missing persons regardless of the time period during which such person became a missing person.

Another concern raised last week was attempts to give prominence to one religion in Sri Lanka, namely Buddhism.The Catholic clergy and the Catholic community in Sri Lanka issued a joint statement with 99 signatures last week stating that Sri Lanka should be a secular state that recognises, promotes and protects all universally recognised human rights.

“To us, a secular state is one that doesn’t give foremost place, prominence and privileges to one religion, constitutionally or in practice. In our view, such a secular state will enable individuals and communities to be more religious and spiritual and will also promote harmony and co-existence amongst different religious communities. It will strengthen the right of freedom of religion of all individuals and communities. While we recognise the historical and present day contributions of all religions to the country and its peoples, we are also conscious of attacks, restrictions and a variety of problems faced by the numerically smaller religious and ethnic communities, at the hands of the Sinhalese – Buddhist dominated Sri Lankan state and majority communities. Constitutional provisions are one of the important means of protecting rights of numerical minorities,” the joint statement said.
The Catholics called for the removal of article 9 of the present constitution which says “The Republic of Sri Lanka shall give Buddhism the foremost place”.

The joint statement said the clause appears to be a contradiction to article 12 (2) of the present constitution which states that “no citizen shall be discriminated against on the grounds of race, religion, language, caste, sex, political opinion, place of birth or any such grounds”.In this regard, the Catholic community endorses the statement in the 2013 “Pastoral letter” by all the Catholic Bishops in Sri Lanka that stated that “Sri Lanka should shed all those clauses or conditions in its constitution that could be interpreted or read to justify different forms of discrimination against its people”.

They also rejected a recent statement of the Archbishop of Colombo, Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith, saying that he doesn’t recognise the concept of a secular state.

“We are also concerned about the Cardinal’s statement implying that human rights are a western idea imposed on us, and that it can destroy our cultural heritage. It is our firm conviction that human rights are universal and captures the teachings of Christianity and other religious and spiritual traditions about human dignity, equality, value of life etc. During times when Church leadership has been blind and deaf to biblical and church teaching on human rights, we recognise and appreciate the role social movements and secular institutions such as the UN has played in awakening us to our vocation to promote and protect human rights,” the statement said.

While welcoming the Cardinal’s commitment to work together with Buddhists, the signatories to the joint statement underlined that such collaboration must be not to discriminate and suppress numerical minorities, but rather, to promote and protect human rights of all, especially of numerical minorities.

“To our knowledge, Cardinal’s statement has been made without consultation and thus, it may not even represent the views of Catholics of the Colombo Archdiocese. At the moment, Cardinal Ranjith is the President of the Catholic Bishops Conference of Sri Lanka, which historically has been a position rotated on a regular basis, amongst the different Bishops who are members of the conference. But it should be noted that the Archbishop of Colombo doesn’t represent or lead in anyway the other 11 Catholic dioceses in Sri Lanka which are headed by their own Bishops.

There are also many Catholic Religious Congregations in Sri Lanka which the Archbishop doesn’t represent. For all purposes, this appears to be a personal statement of the Cardinal and not of the Catholics in Sri Lanka,” the joint statement said.

The Catholics recognised the relevance and applicability of universally recognised human rights to Sri Lanka and fundamental vocation of all Catholics, along with all others, to protect and promote human rights.

They also committed themselves to a secular Sri Lanka, which in practice and in its Constitution, will not give foremost place, prominence or privilege to any religion, but rather will recognise and promote rights of all persons and communities to have a religion of his or her choice or not to have a religion.

TGTE Prime Minister Says Tamil Eelam Is Still A Viable Solution


By Pitasanna Shanmugathas –August 11, 2016 
Pitasanna Shanmugathas
Pitasanna Shanmugathas
Colombo TelegraphI conducted an interview with Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran—the Prime Minister of the Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE). Mr. Rudrakumaran spoke in depth about the mission of the TGTE, viability of a separate homeland for the Tamil people, his work as the former legal advisor to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), and alleged human rights violations committed during the ethnic conflict.
I asked Mr.Rudrakumaran, why a separatist solution, in the eyes of the TGTE, still remains the most viable solution for the Tamil people.
Mr.Rudrakumaran responded by stating that “the Tamils constitute a nation” entrenched with objective factors such as a distinct language and distinct culture. Mr. Rudrakumaran, furthermore, asserted that based on the relationship Tamils have to a “definable historic homeland” it is the position of the TGTE that “Tamils do not constitute a minority but a nation.” Therefore, Mr. Rudrakumaran stated, “they [Tamils] are entitled to the right to self-determination.” Mr. Rudrakumaran cited the General Assembly resolution 2625 as evidence that the Tamils’ right to self-determination can be exercised in various forms including, “in the form of a federation or associative structure and also in the form of an establishment of an independent state.”Visvanathan Rudrakumaran Credit- Samuel Oakford:IPS
I asked Mr. Rudrakumaran what the TGTE has accomplished since its creation six years ago. Mr. Rudrakumaran stated that the TGTE has kept the aspirations of the Tamil people alive. On the 40th anniversary of the Vaddukoddai resolution, the TGTE held its commemoration across from the UN head office which Mr. Rudrakumaran added signified how the Tamil issue, because of the role played by the LTTE and the TGTE, “galvanized the international community.”
Adding to the accomplishments of the TGTE, Mr. Rudrakumaran stated that the TGTE has established a Monitoring and Accountability Panel (MAP), consisting of five individuals with international credentials, with a mandate to “monitor the design and mechanism of transitional justice in Sri Lanka” from a “victim’s perspective.” The MAP will ensure, according to Rudrakumaran, “whatever mechanisms proposed by the Sri Lankan government are in compliance with the human rights council resolution” and this mandate, Mr. Rudrakumaran added, is to “prevent any sham or show trials” which maybe orchestrated by the Sri Lankan government.