Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, August 4, 2016

South Africans deliver stinging rebuke to ANC

Voters turn away from the party of the status quo, depriving it of majorities in Johannesburg, Pretoria and Port Elizabeth

South Africa’s main opposition Democratic Alliance party leader, Mmusi Maimane, at the Independent Electoral Commission’s counting centre in Pretoria. Photograph: Gianluigi Guercia/AFP/Getty Images-ANC and South African Communist party supporters dance and sing in celebration at Wembezi township near Estcourt around 215km west of Durban. Photograph: Rajesh Jantilal/AFP/Getty Images
President Jacob Zuma casts his vote at Ntolwane primary school in the municipal elections in Nkandla, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. Photograph: Elmond Jiyane/EPA

-Thursday 4 August 2016

South Africans have delivered a stinging rebuke to the ANC, handing the party its first major election setback since it swept to power after the end of apartheid over two decades ago.

Frustrated at a stagnant economy, a 25% unemployment rate and corruption allegations that have dogged Jacob Zuma, the president, voters in local elections turned away from the ruling party in their millions and looked likely to deprive it of control in three major cities.

The ANC is likely to claim a slim overall majority when final results are announced but with over 80% of votes counted, it appears to have lost control of Johannesburg and the urban sprawl surrounding the capital, Pretoria.

By Thursday evening, the opposition Democratic Alliance (DA) had claimed victory in the Nelson Mandela Bay area, which includes the city of Port Elizabeth. The DA secured enough votes to promise that although they would need a partner, they would not form a coalition with the ANC.

The cities together are home to more than 8 million people, with annual budgets of about $10bn (£7.5bn). The loss of control, amid plummeting overall support for the ANC, will be a major psychological blow to a party so convinced of its right to rule that the general secretary recently declared it had a mandate from God.

As the scale of their advances became clear, opposition leaders were quick to claim their victory as a transformation not just of local councils but of the national political landscape. “We have shown some incredible growth,” Mmusi Maimane, the DA’s first black leader, told 702 radio. “We call this the change election because we felt that it was a referendum on Jacob Zuma as a national figure, but we also had a referendum about the future of South Africa.”

For decades the ANC has claimed an unshakeable dominance of South African politics, entering elections with an expectation of victory that critics say has contributed to stagnation and corruption.

This election will be the first time the party of the anti-apartheid hero, Nelson Mandela, has won less than 60% of the vote since country’s first multiracial poll in 1994.

Thursday’s vote sent a clear message that the years when South Africa effectively operated as a one-party system are over, or drawing towards a close. A record number of voters, over 26 million, registered for the election, with rival parties apparently mobilising supporters to sign up and then attend polling stations far more effectively than the ANC.

The DA was particularly strong in more prosperous suburban areas around the cities, said election analyst Dawie Scholtz. But it also showed that a party once dismissed as the voice of the white middle classes could challenge the ruling party in its strongholds. “The DA did also make modest inroads into the ANC traditional township voter base,” he told the Guardian. “That point is important.”

There was also a small but significant challenge from a radical new party, the Economic Freedom Fighters, which has not taken control of any councils but claimed enough support to potentially serve as kingmaker in divided cities. Led by ex-ANC firebrand, Julius Malema, it was contesting local elections for the first time on a platform that includes promises to nationalise mines and redistribute land without compensation.

The results will be damaging to Zuma. In a personal blow, the ANC also failed to take control of his home ward of Nkandla from the Zulu Nationalist Inkatha Freedom party (IPF).

“Jacob Zuma will go home to an IFP-run ward, go to parliament in a DA-run city and likely to work in a DA-run capital city,” said the DA’s spokesperson, Phumzile Van Damme in a triumphant tweet.

The results will increase pressure on Zuma, whose critics inside the party say he is irrevocably tainted and would like to see him step down before his term ends in three years, making way for a new leader to contest the 2019 general election.

They are likely to be shrugged off by a man who has weathered months of serious scandals with his power-base largely intact. Earlier this year he was ordered by the constitutional court to repay over a half a million dollars of state money spent on upgrades to his personal home, which has become a virtual byword for corruption.

He has also been accused of allowing a family of businessmen, the Guptas, undue influence in national affairs. Several senior politicians have alleged that family members were involved in deciding cabinet appointments.

Zuma’s handling of the economy has caused particular frustration. South Africa is plagued by stagnation and crippling unemployment, which affects over a quarter of working-age South Africans and disproportionately its young people.

There is also anger about widespread inequality. About 80% of South Africa’s 54 million citizens are black, but most land and companies remain in the hands of white people who make up fewer than 10% of the population.

“While the middle classes are upset about government incompetence and corruption, the working classes are economically frustrated by the lack of jobs – good paying or not,” said Sebastian Spio-Garbrah, DaMina Advisors’ chief Africafrontier markets analyst.

The DA has capitalised on a reputation for efficient management in the one city it does control, Cape Town, to lure voters hoping for a revival in an economy that never fully recovered from the 2008 global economic crisis and which is still teetering on the brink of recession. It has promised to liberalise the economy, including cutting red tape and making it easier to hire and fire workers, and even modest urban victories for the DA are likely to be welcomed by markets and investors.

UN delivers aid to Syrians trapped on Jordan border for first time in months

75,000 people are trapped in makeshift camps where temperatures reach 50 degrees Celsius and there is little access to water and shelter

As many as 17,000 Syrians are estimated to be marooned at the Jordanian border (MEE/Annie Sakkab)


Thursday 4 August 2016
UN aid agencies successfully delivery aid to tens of thousands of Syrian refugees trapped on the Jordan border on Thursday for the first time since June.
Supplies of desperately-needed food and hygiene supplies were delivered providing a key lifeline to those living in makeshift refugee camps and unable to enter Jordan, a joint statement by the heads of the World Food Programme, the children's agency UNICEF and the International Organization for Migration, as well as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, said.
Jordan closed its border with Syria in June after a suicide bombing claimed by the Islamic State group killed seven soldiers.
The attack took place near a makeshift desert camp and aid groups have since been unable to deliver supplies to tens of thousands of Syrian refugees stranded at the border.
The heads of the four UN agencies announced the "successful completion of a relief operation to provide more than 75,000 people with food and humanitarian items". Other estimates have put the figure of those displaced even higher, suggestion 100,000 people could have been marooned on the border. 
"Unable either to cross the border or turn back, the situation facing these women, men and children has grown more dire by the day," they said.
"Sheltering in makeshift tents in harsh desert conditions with temperatures of up to 50 degrees Celsius and sudden sand storms, they are without sufficient food and have barely enough water to survive," the statement added.
However, the future of further aid deliveries is uncertain. The Jordanian government agreed on 13 July to a one-off aid delivery for those trapped on its border after an appeal by the United Nations, but it took more than three weeks for the drop to take place and Amman has not said if it will allow additional supplies to be distributed.
The UN aid agency heads warned that health care was "urgently" needed, particularly for pregnant women, children and other vulnerable groups such as the elderly and the sick trapped along the border.
"We look forward to further efforts to reach people… with humanitarian assistance in time to save their lives," they said, thanking the Jordanian government for its cooperation.
Jordan declared the border area a "military zone" after the June attack, blocking access to Syrian refugees and sparking fears over their fate.
Several international aid and rights groups have since urged Jordan to revoke its decision and keep its borders open to refugees fleeing Syria's five-year war.
Jordan already hosts hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees.

Nepal: With Prachanda, India Must Seize the Moment


Prachanda_Nepal

India must engage Nepali leaders politically, not through agencies or diplomats, which should be the exception. The mistrust between New Delhi and transformed Maoists will slowly evaporate as both have learnt lessons
by Ashok K Mehta

( August 3, 2016, New Delhi, Sri Lanka Guardian) About the providential come-back today, after a gap of seven years of Prachanda as the 24th Prime Minister of Nepal in 26 years, most Nepalese will say: “Lord Pashupatinath ordained it”. Some will add: “and India”. After all, New Delhi has been instrumental in all the historic changes in Nepal: Restoration of active monarchy (1950); revival of democracy (1990) and initiation of the ongoing peace process in 2005. Ironically, it is Indian diplomats who cite the dismissal of Prime Minister Prachanda in May 2009 and subsequent prevention of a Maoist-led Government till Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai was assisted in forming one in 2011 as their political victory. Now the same but transformed though weakened Prachanda (82 seats) has broken the Left alliance Government with Unified Marxist-Leninist (UML) led by KP Oli and for the first time initiated a Left (Maoist)-Right coalition with Nepali Congress (NC) (207 seats).

This experiment was to have started earlier in May this year but was aborted due to differences among the Maoists and the decisive role played by China for the first time in Nepal’s domestic politics in rescuing the Left alliance Government. This time around, though, realising the dye had been cast, Chinese Ambassador Wu Chintai has assured Prachanda of full support in order that the 10 agreements signed by Oli with China will be honoured. Seizing the initiative, Prachanda told the Ambassador that the deals were infact conceived by him.

It seems there aren’t too many gentlemen politicians in the Constituent Assembly as powersharing agreements have apparently been dishonoured or as generally claimed, there were none between Sushil Koirala and Oli; Oli and Prachanda; and now Prachanda and SB Deuba. The latter is unlikely to lose much sleep as he has the gentleman’s agreement in writing. Oli has turned out to be the most anti-India Prime Minister — like Prachanda in 2008 he was attempting to subvert the system — though to his credit in Nepali eyes, he upheld Nepal’s strategic autonomy. In fact, he defied India by refusing to do its bidding at the time over anomalies in the Constitution and became a folklore hero bearing the burden of the unpopular blockade. UML is the best organised grassroots party with good leadership, abundant funds, people’s support and most importantly, China’s full backing. UML is down, not out. Still, it is expected to do well in the parliamentary elections early 2018.

The new Great Game is about altering the political arithmetic in Nepal’s next elections: Ensuring NC remains the single-largest party, downsising UML from no two to no three position, elevating Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist-Centre) to no two slot by helping them rebuild; and unifying the Madhesis. Not easy! India’s efforts in the peace process are about mainstreaming the Maoists and democratisation of Nepal. The mistrust between New Delhi and transformed Maoists will slowly evaporate as both have learnt their lessons. Prachanda quotes his post-conflict guru, the legendary GP Koirala who told him: “when you get lost in the jungle you return to where you started the journey”. In relation to rediscovering India he says: “I have told the Chinese, you have your place, but India is different. Our relations with India are ancient and historic”. In earlier times he would say: “we need China to balance India and look beyond it”. Prachanda has turned into a pragmatic and a realist politician.

Prachanda has pledged to implement the Constitution, address residual constitutional demands of Madhesis and marginalised communities in phases, step up post-earthquake reconstruction, bolster the economy and hold local body, municipal and district committee elections, all in nine months. Addressing the war excesses in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is a priority issue. Any constitutional amendment will require UML cooperation for a two-third vote in the House or pending the passage of amendments to after the next elections. The new electoral system encourages a hung Parliament. Of the 300 seats in the lower House, 165 are through first past the post and 75 seats via proportional representation with the remaining 60 seats by nomination. This will likely result in politically unstable coalitions, continuing the trend of the last two decades.

The Army will be wary of the Prachanda-led Government if the defence portfolio is kept by the Maoists. The last political upheaval occurred under Prachanda’s watch when after he sacked Army Chief, General Rukmangad Katwal, President RB Yadav reinstated him. The present Army Chief, Gen Rajendra Chhetri has said the Army is taking stock of the situation and will act in national interest. Chinese President Xi Jinping was to visit Nepal in October provided there was political stability in the country. Prachanda may still be able to swing the visit. China has moved beyond merely its main concern of the 30,000 Tibetans in Nepal to meddling in the country’s internal politics. Nepal has favoured China by awarding several Government-to-Government projects.

The new Government is a great opportunity for India to repair both Government-to-Government and people-to-people relations following the economic blockade and allegations that India was behind the destabilisation of the Oli Government not once but twice. In Nepal, all is not fair in love and politics. India-Nepal relations are at their lowest ebb, this after an NC-led Government under Prime Minister Sushil Koirala took charge in 2013 after a resounding electoral victory. Prime Minister Modi’s visit in mid-2014 won over Nepal as never before. All was forgiven and forgotten as the one billion dollar development package took off. Koirala developed a personal rapport with Modi over a monthly Mann ki Baat over the telephone. In one of his conversations, Koirala questioned the prudence of nominating disputed Lipulekh claimed by Nepal as a trading point between India and China. This and other misunderstandings led for the first time to a NC Prime Minister not being invited on a bilateral visit to India. The rest is history.

India should engage Nepali leaders politically, not through agencies or diplomats which should be the exception. President Bidya Devi Bhandari should re-schedule her postponed official visit after Prime Minister Prachanda first renews political bonding with New Delhi. Prachanda Maoists can re-write their failed boast: ‘Aru lai heryo patak patak; hami lai heryo yas patak’ (You have watched others time and again, watch us this time). Oli’s defeat and Messers Prachanda and Deuba’s comeback are India’s victory for now.

Ashok_K_MehtaAshok K Mehta is a retired Lt General of the Indian Army. He writes extensively on defence matters and anchors Defence Watch on Doordarshan, India’s premier TV channel. 

How Technology Can Restore Our Trust in Democracy

Our devices making us feel more disconnected than ever. What if we used them to make democracy work better?
How Technology Can Restore Our Trust in Democracy

BY CENK SIDAR-AUGUST 3, 2016

The travails of the Arab Spring, the rise of the Islamic State, and the upsurge of right-wing populism throughout the countries of West all demonstrate a rising frustration with the liberal democratic order in the years since the 2008 financial crisis. There is a growing intellectual consensus that the world is sailing into uncharted territory: a realm marked by authoritarianism, shallow populism, and extremism.

One way to overcome this global resentment is to use the best tools we have to build a more inclusive and direct democracy. Could new technologies such as Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), data analytics, crowdsourcing, and Blockchain help to restore meaningful dialogue and win back people’s hearts and minds?

Underpinning our unsettling current environment is an irony:

Thanks to modern communication technology, the world is more connected than ever — but average people feel more disconnected. In the United States, polls show that trust in government is at a 50-year low. Frustrated Trump supporters and the Britons who voted for Brexit both have a sense of having “lost out” as the global elite consolidates its power and becomes less responsive to the rest of society. This is not an irrational belief: Branko Milanovic, a leading inequality scholar, has found that people in the lower and middle parts of rich countries’ income distributions have been the losers of the last 15 years of globalization.

The same 15 years have also brought astounding advances in technology, from the rise of the Internet to the growing ubiquity of smartphones. And Western society has, to some extent, struggled to find its bearings amid this transition. Militant groups seduce young people through social media. The Internet enables consumers to choose only the news that matches their preconceived beliefs, offering a bottomless well of partisan fury and conspiracy theories. Cable news airing 24/7 keeps viewers in a state of agitation. In short, communication technologies that are meant to bring us together end up dividing us instead (and not least because our politicians have chosen to game these tools for their own advantage).

It is time to make technology part of the solution. More urgently than ever, leaders, innovators, and activists need to open up the political marketplace to allow technology to realize its potential for enabling direct citizen participation. This is an ideal way to restore trust in the democratic process.

As the London School of Economics’ Mary Kaldor put it recently: “The task of global governance has to be reconceptualized to make it possible for citizens to influence the decisions that affect their lives — to reclaim substantive democracy.” One notable exception to the technological disconnect has been fundraising, as candidates have tapped into the Internet to enable millions of average voters to donate small sums. With the right vision, however, technological innovation in politics could go well beyond asking people for money.

Instead, it could be harnessed to enable citizens to participate in the political process more directly. Just as “fintech” has made lending and investing more accessible to a wider number of ordinary people, and “edtech” has allowed millions to study for online degrees, why can’t “votetech” make our democracy more, well, democratic?

Current authentication technologies, along with the growing usage of smartphones and tablets, could revolutionize the act of voting well beyond simply choosing candidates every two to four years. A DC-based start-up,InnoVote, building a product to let people vote much more safely and conveniently. The key is Blockchain, a distributed database technology originally developed for financial transactions, that securely authenticates the identity of the person making the transaction. If the company succeeds, and if officials adopt the system, this could offer people a convenient and secure way to vote.

Experts note that Blockchain is much more secure than any paper-based system could be. Of course, it is also more convenient. Through the use of such a system, voters could register their opinions from their own homes on any bill before a legislature. Too busy to vote in real time? Current technologies enable you to configure your political preferences in advance and have the system vote for you automatically using data analytics. In such a system, lawmakers would be more like conduits for information, not proxies for their constituents who sometimes seem more beholden to donors.

Truth is a populist demagogue’s worst enemy. Authoritarian leaders have one thing in common: They all lie. As things stand now, they are abetted in this by current technology and media fragmentation. But it doesn’t have to be this way. In the not-too-distant future, augmented reality systems combined with wearable devices will allow citizens to listen to political speeches or read op-eds with live fact-checking seemingly right in front of their faces. Or imagine a virtual town hall meeting to discuss some law or regulation that may impact you, which — thanks to virtual reality — you can attend even if you are hundreds of miles away. Compared to existing techniques, such as livestreaming, AR and VR can provide added convenience and efficiency, enabling millions to participate in real time from wherever they are, not just in front of their computers. As wearable technologies become more common, these technologies will provide limitless opportunities for citizens to engage more fully in political decision-making.

There are challenges. The first is one of access to these digital tools, which remains uneven even in well-off countries, where residents of rural or low-income communities are much less likely to have broadband internet or updated devices. Second, skeptics might suggest that a system of popular voting on all legislation would lead to what the American founding fathers called “the tyranny of the majority.” The role of politicians and courts would be key here — as mediators, educators, and guardians of human rights.
And finally, to make real-time fact-checking credible, the mainstream media would need to finally let go of antiquated notions of “impartiality” and continue moving toward a model where, particularly in political reporting, assertions are not automatically treated as valid so long as “the other side of the story” is also told. Sometimes, only one side has the facts right.

The global establishment needs to be willing to get out of the way and allow these innovations to happen. That, indeed, is perhaps the biggest challenge of all. At the local level, at the very least, direct democracy does and can work. Just ask any small-town resident of New England on Town Meeting Day each March. And technology can enable this level of participation on a wider scale. We should also remember that the establishment is itself shifting to encompass a younger, more tech-savvy cohort — whose energy can be turned toward a great democratic project.

While technology is the key tool this project needs, political will is still the most important driver of change. Elites must be willing to let ordinary people have more of a say. Otherwise technology will lead to resentment and isolation rather than a sense of fairness and justice. Could it be too late for liberal democracy? Yes — if the global elite refuses, as the old Apple ads put it, to “think different.”
Photo credit: JASON KEMPIN/Getty Images for Samsung

McDonald’s Stops Using Antibiotic Chicken Faster Than Expected


Convincing people it serves wholesome food is particularly important for McDonalds, which has long courted families with its Happy Meals and Ronald McDonald mascot.
 The Huffington Post08/04/2016
McDonald’s Corp (MCD.N) will replace corn syrup in hamburger buns with sugar this month and has removed antibiotics that are important to human medicine from its chicken months ahead of schedule, it said on Monday, moves that are part of its drive to target increasingly health-conscious consumers.
The fast food company also said it eliminated artificial preservatives from Chicken McNuggets and several breakfast items, including scrambled eggs.
McDonald’s is reacting to a shift in consumer tastes toward healthier, more natural foods and competing with other restaurants that are overhauling their menus to feature items free of processed ingredients.
McDonald’s USA President Mike Andres told reporters at the company’s headquarters that the changes announced on Monday will affect about half its menu and more adjustments would follow.
Some consumers have turned away from products containing high-fructose corn syrup, which is derived from corn starch, because of concerns it may be linked to obesity.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has said it is unaware of any differences in the safety of foods containing equal amounts of corn syrup and sugar, or sucrose.
McDonald’s is “following the customers” in switching to sucrose in buns used on Big Macs, Quarter Pounders, hamburgers and other sandwiches, said Marion Gross, senior vice president of McDonald’s North America supply chain.
“We know that they don’t feel good about high-fructose corn syrup so we’re giving them what they’re looking for instead,” she said.
McDonald’s stopped adding an artificial preservative to the cooking oil used to make Chicken McNuggets and removed artificial preservatives from pork sausage patties, eggs served on McGriddles breakfast sandwiches and scrambled eggs on breakfast platters.
It also removed chicken skin, safflower oil and citric acid from the meat of its McNuggets, swapping them for pea starch, rice starch and powdered lemon juice.
Extra costs related to the changes will not be passed on to consumers, partly because a decline in commodity prices has reduced some food expenses, Andres said.
Last week, McDonald’s said the U.S. restaurant industry will raise prices far more than supermarkets this year, sending a chill through a sector that is searching for ways to protect itself from higher worker wages.
McDonald’s had previously planned to stop buying chicken raised with antibiotics important to human medicine from its suppliers, Tyson Foods Inc (TSN.N) and Keystone Foods, by March 2017.
It completed the change earlier due to quicker than expected work by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which helped to verify that birds were not given the drugs, Gross said.
Some health experts have raised concerns that the overuse of antibiotics for poultry may diminish their effectiveness in fighting disease in humans.
McDonald’s shares rose 0.3 percent to $118.01.
(Editing by Frances Kerry and Andrew Hay)

Criminal for political leaders to interfere


DR.Vickramabahu Karunaratne-2016-08-04

The Government Medical Officers Association (GMOA) has vowed to abstain from teaching medical students of unapproved medical colleges such as the South Asian Institute of Technology and Medicine (SAITM) in Malabe, if they come to State hospitals for clinical training. Pledging their support for the ongoing struggle the undergraduates of the State Medical Faculties demanding the abolition of SAITM, the GMOA said it would in no way help medical students who have not been approved by the Sri Lanka Medical Council (SLMC).

GMOA media spokesman Dr. Navin de Soysa explained that the government must resolve the concerns of the medical students who have taken to the streets for the second time since the 1988-1989 insurrection. "We warn the government. This could turn violent just like 88-89 uprising where thousands of students fought against the then government. These students are best result holders countrywide. We should not allow them to waste their valuable time on such issues which should be addressed by the authorities," Dr. de Soysa has said.

In the meantime Chairman SAITM, Dr. Neville Fernando, admitted that not only Minister Senaratne's daughter-in-law, but also the daughters and daughters-in-law of other ministers in the current government are also studying at the SAITM. Even though there is heavy criticism of the educational qualifications of those who study at the SAITM, Dr.
Fernando said that they had students with better grades -- 'A' levels with 3 'A's who were unable to enter State universities because of the district quota system. He said that State university students must give up their superiority complex, because education is a fundamental right for all students, whether State or non-State. However, he was unable to explain the poor standard of his medical faculty and why they demand support from State sector hospitals.

Investing for profit

"I built the Neville Fernando Teaching Hospital and equipped it with all the modern hi-tech equipment. This includes 6 surgical theatres, with one having a camera in the light and which could be focused on the site of the surgery and the picture telecast to the lecture hall where the students are seated. The 1,000 bed hospital was constructed at an investment of Rs 2,000 million for the use of students," Dr. Fernando said. Clearly he was investing for profit, and then he should make it viable by improving the standard of the institute. He should not pass the burden to the State sector.

Hence it was correct for the GMOA to file a complaint with the Bribery and Corruption Commission against the Health Ministry for allowing students of SAITM to undergo clinical training at government hospitals. GMOA took the stand that the Secretary to the Health Ministry has caused a misuse of public property by allowing a private institution and its students who are not qualified to study as medical students to involve in operations in a State hospital. It is an illegal act which could cause a serious loss to the State whilst giving SAITM which is a private organization an unlawful and unjust gain out of public resources.

SLMC has reportedly refused to register the first batch of 30 medical students, who had passed out from the South Asian Institute of Technology and Medicine. Apparently these students cannot gain even provisional registration. GMOA says that provisional registration could only be granted to the students who have passed out from a recognized university or institution under Section 19C of the Medical Ordinance. As the SAITM's medical degree did not meet the prescribed standards as said by the Sri Lanka Medical Council, students who pass out from the SAITM could not practise as doctors in Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka Medical Council Chairman Carlo Fonseka said he would resign if those who pass out from SAITM were given provisional registration to practise as doctors in Sri Lanka. He said this during a meeting held with the Government Medical Officers Association at the SLMC office recently. GMOA Treasurer Nalinda Herath told a media briefing that Prof. Fonseka told them that the SLMC stance on the SAITM controversy remains unchanged despite any political interference. It is criminal for political leaders to interfere with the work of professional councils and academic bodies. It will be hilarious if the Yahapalana Government goes back to the era where by royal order mathematical formulae were changed!

Tamil Question: Is It Between The Leaders Or The People?


Colombo Telegraph
By Vishwamithra1984 –August 3, 2016
“Every miserable fool who has nothing at all of which he can be proud, adopts as a last resource pride in the nation to which he belongs; he is ready and happy to defend all its faults and follies tooth and nail, thus reimbursing himself for his own inferiority.” ~ Arthur Schopenhauer, Essays and Aphorism
Let us not constrain ourselves to the arguments and debates bandied about by so-called pundits. Most of these self-proclaimed pundits, University academics, professionals and leadership groups usually are almost always wrong or late in understanding the real reasons behind a knotty issue that has been irking our nation- Sri Lankan nation- for quite a long time. A long, long time indeed. The Tamil Question and its multiple facets, ranging from Tamil homeland, discrimination at all levels of civil life, independence of movement, assembly and speech to University entrance anomalies, are all deeply rooted in a fundamental premise of being treated as second-class citizens in a country whose Constitution enshrines clauses and chapters upholding and protecting all minorities as equal before the law.Wigneswaran Mahinda
Whether any Sinhalese agrees or not, the writer, a Sinhalese Buddhist, most unequivocally writes and affirms that it is beyond any shadow of doubt or suspicion that the notion of that mal-treatment of our minorities is a fact. The inbred thinking of the majority Sinhalese is fundamentally flawed. That flaw is shared by all majority communities of the human family. In the context of nation states and racial demarcations, it has been observed that power of the majority almost always prevails. However, in modern history- excluding, of course, the countries that were ruled by colonial powers of the British Empire and other imperial powers such as the Portuguese and Dutch- South Africa, until the White-minority rule eventually gave up under severest of international pressure, was the last country where a majority was ruled by an under-numbered minority.

Bury them right now


Featured image courtesy the Wall Street Journal

BRIAN JEGANATHAN on 08/03/2016

The modern political discourse on conflict resolution becomes a banality when it invariably tends to get stuck with a buzz word or phrase. Then, the intellectual circus begins. The experts coin them or rush to appropriate or even misappropriate this word or that phrase, resulting in a plethora of analyses, expositions, theorising, discourses and counter-discourses and speculations; information sessions, seminar series and costly production of reports and monographs.

The expert and the specialist are soon convinced that they have got the bull by the horns. Thus, it opens up spaces for mini arenas where they could enact their savage intellectual pugilism. The battle is then to extricate these words and phrases from the monopoly of the intellectual cohort.

At a cursory glance, though, it appears that all this intellectual fermentation is taking place well within the consensual or deliberative democratic framework. Taking place in the public sphere, solidly grounded on the Habermasian communicative rationality and ideal speech divorced from domination or coercion. Reason prevailing like one single dazzling sun to guide and lead them to consensus. The underlying assumption, however, being that everyone gets equal floor-space to enunciate and deliberate on issues that touch their lives radically, in the medium they are most comfortable with.

On the contrary, this implied everyone is not the every single member constituting the “masses.” But a minority of us who are convinced that the majority needs our explication as their eyes and minds are glazed with the mist of ideology. Therefore, we should be the intellectual agents doing the thinking on behalf of them. So this agential catalyst has to be provided to kick-start the majority who are incapable of discourse. They are visible, but their speech makes only a garbled noise. So this solemn duty falls upon the shoulders of the intellectual and the expert to take the masses from ignorance to full knowledge incrementally; from darkness to light.

My fear is whether the phrase “transitional justice” is stuck in our throat like a tiny fish bone that annoyingly prevents us from the ordinary ways of speaking, thinking and questioning. Transitional-justice-stuck-in-the-throat phenomenon transports the expert into an asphyxiating world of theory and concepts. Once we are blissfully hooked up to the world of politico-theoretical mini heaven, it takes a while to sober down and descend.

An analogy could be drawn from the transfiguration story of Jesus on the mountain. When Peter the disciple found Jesus in glorious splendor in the company of greats like Moses and Elijah, he wished to remain in that blissful high. Similarly, when the intellectual has reached the peak he would be tempted to implore like Peter saying, “Master, it is good for us to be here. Let us put up some shelters—one for you, one for Foucault, one for Derrida and one for X, Y and Z.” Because it is so good up there!

Noam Chomsky, a man who has firsthand experience in wading knee-deep in theory, warns that addiction to heavy doses of theoretical substance can veer us from popular struggles, producing grave consequences. Although we claim that we conduct our theoretical forays in the name of popular struggles and for the sake of the masses, there is a great likelihood for them to metamorphose into an individualistic theoretical phantasm.

For instance, “transitional justice” is slap bang in the centre of a campaign to right abominable wrongs committed by one section of the population against another and vice versa. Yet, we should not ignore Chomsky’s presentiment, but pay heed in good faith because our theoreticism and professionalism can atrophy into preposterous levels. Reason enthroned in its glorious splendor can delegitimise every other form of communicative tool and alternative ways of thinking and contemplating. This poem was written in the spirit of exploring alternative power-tools to discuss our experience of horrible crimes committed in the name of ideology.

Bury them right now!
Bury them right now
Right now I say!
Before corpses sprout in your paddy fields and backyards;
And your fleshy gourds crawl with maggots
Before your waterways clog up with languishing souls
Lost in a no-man’s land
Before your valleys and reservoirs
Crackle with the silence of a child
Shredded by a blind shell
Or corpse-sludge pour down your sink taps
And your goats and cattle make uncanny noises –
Shrilly screams of babies puking shrapnel
Or before your fowls wear dead men’s teeth
And tell stories you would hate to hear
And your shrines and temples
Wear the menacing stillness of an unexploded ordinance
Hesitating?
Just do it, go ahead and bury them properly –
Myrrh and frankincense, candles and prayers and holy water
Wrapped and laid in marked graves
Or burnt on sandalwood pyres
With wreaths and headstones
Etched with name, age and the CAUSE of death –
Closure!
Or. Soon, splinters of bones will rattle in your soup bowls
And your coffee and tea will turn into formaldehyde
Yes, before your sleep is trampled upon and crushed
By bloated cadaver-feet
Before your perfumes give off the scent of stale death
And your mirrors reflect not you
But dissolving flesh of youth –
Carrions stuck in ditches behind the razor-concertina fence
Or before babies drop one by one
Like burnt cherubs through holes in the cloud
And join the swarm of fattened winged-maggots
To rouse you out of the rigor mortis of your indolence
And quicken your lead-footed transition mired in patriotic slime
Beware!
For heaven’s sake, bury them right now!
Or a trail of compost memories will fertilize
The barren patches of death-lands
Where hidden red-buds of ideology await a cue
From the next insurgent monsoonal rain!

Scarcity of drugs in estate hospitals

Scarcity of drugs in estate hospitals


Aug 03, 2016
It is reported that owing to the scarcity of drugs in the Agrapatana, Lindula , Dayagama  and other estate hospitals the estate workers have been terribly inconvenienced.
The patients who come for treatment to these hospitals are compelled to purchase the prescribed drugs from private pharmacies.
What these estate workers have uttered is that they become further handicapped when they have to purchase the drugs prescribed from private pharmacies. Hence they have requested the related authorities to provide drugs to these estate hospitals.

IN RESPONSE TO CARDINAL MALCOLM RANJITH A GROUP OF CATHOLICS CALLS FOR SECULAR SRI LANKA


Cardinal-Malcolm-Ranjith-Mahinda-and-Shiranthi

(Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith politically was close to former Prez Rajapaksa)

Sri Lanka Brief03/08/2016

A secular Sri Lanka will promote religious harmony & help us to be more religious.
(Statement by group of Sri Lankan Catholics – 3rd August 2016).

As Catholic Clergy, Religious and laity from different Catholic dioceses and different Religious congregations from different parts of Sri Lanka, it is our view that Sri Lanka should be a secular state that recognizes, promotes and protects all universally recognized human rights.

To us, a secular state is one that doesn’t give foremost place, prominence and privileges to one religion, constitutionally or in practice. In our view, such a secular state will enable individuals and communities to be more religious and spiritual and will also promote harmony and co-existence amongst different religious communities. It will strengthen right of freedom of religion of all individuals and communities.

While we recognize the historical and present day contributions of all religions to the country and its peoples,we are also conscious of attacks, restrictions and variety of problems faced by the numerically smaller religious and ethnic communities, at the hands of the Sinhalese – Buddhist dominated Sri Lankan state and majority communities. Constitutional provisions are one of the important means of protecting rights of numerical minorities.

To have a secular state, article 9 of the present constitution that says “The Republic of Sri Lanka shall give Buddhism the foremost place” must be done away. To us, this clause appears to be a contradiction to article 12 (2) of the present constitution which states that “no citizen shall be discriminated against on the grounds of race, religion, language, caste, sex, political opinion, place of birth or any such grounds”.
In this regard, we endorse the statement in the 2013 “Pastoral letter” by all the Catholic Bishops in Sri Lanka that stated that “Sri Lanka should shed all those clauses or conditions in its constitution that could be interpreted or read to justify different forms of discrimination against its people”.1

It’s in this context that we note with concern, and reject the recent statement of the Archbishop of Colombo,  Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, saying that he doesn’t recognize the concept of a secular state. 2

We are also concerned about the Cardinal’s statement implying that human rights are a western idea imposed on us, and that it can destroy our cultural heritage3 . It is our firm conviction that human rights are universal and captures the teachings of Christianity and other religious and spiritual traditions about human dignity, equality, value of life etc. During times when Church leadership has been blind and deaf to biblical and church teaching on human rights, we recognize and appreciate the role social movements and secular institutions such as the UN has played in awakening us to our vocation to promote and protect human rights.

While we welcome Cardinal’s commitment to work together with Buddhists, we underline that such collaboration must be not to discriminate and suppress numerical minorities, but rather, to promote and protect human rights of all, especially of numerical minorities.

To our knowledge, Cardinal’s statement has been made without consultation and thus, it may not even represent the views of Catholics of the Colombo Archdiocese. At the moment, Cardinal Ranjith is the President of the Catholic Bishops Conference of Sri Lanka, which historically has been a position rotated on a regular basis, amongst the different Bishops who are members of the conference. But it should be noted that the Archbishop of Colombo doesn’t represent or lead in anyway the other 11 Catholic dioceses in Sri Lanka which are headed by their own Bishops. There are also many Catholic Religious Congregations in Sri Lanka which the Archbishop doesn’t represent. For all purposes, this appears to be a personal statement of the Cardinal and not of the Catholics in Sri Lanka.

We reiterate that as Catholics, we recognize the relevance and applicability of universally recognized human rights to Sri Lanka and fundamental vocation of all Catholics, along with all others, to protect and promote human rights. We also commit ourselves to secular Sri Lanka, which in practice and in its constitution, will not give foremost place, prominence or privilege to any religion, but rather will recognize and promote rights of all persons and communities to have a religion of his or her choice or not to have a religion.
1 http://www.archdioceseofcolombo.com/uploads_local/bishops_confernce/pastoral_letter/pastoral_e.pdf
(paragraph 14, opening line)
2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4svw4cLPIio (1:23 – 1:30)
3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4svw4cLPIio (1:45 – 2:17)
Names of the signatories:
1. Ms. Amali Perera
2. Rev. Fr. Ananda Fernando
3. Mr. Anthony Jesudasan
4. Mr. Aruna Roshantha
5. Rev. Sr. Beatrice Fernando
SDS
6. Mrs. Beatrice I. Fernando
7. Mr. Canicious Fernando
8. Mrs. Christine Perera
9. Ms. Deanne Uyangoda
10. Rev. Sr. Deepa Fernando,
HF
11. Mr. Dencil Perera
12. Dharshani Alles SFO
13. Rev. Fr. Edward S. C.
Mariathas
14. Mrs. Erin Perera
15. Mr. Ervin Perera
16. Rev. Sr. Ethal Fernando
17. Mrs. Ethal Perera
18. Mr. Evole F. Perera
19. Rev. Sr. Eymard Fernando
HF
20. Rev. Fr. F. J.Gnanaraj
Croos
21. Mr. Francis Perera
22. Mr. Francis Rajan
23. Mrs. Gertrude Perera
24. Ms. Githika Perera
25. Rev. Fr. Godfrey Fernando
26. Mr. Gration Fernando
27. Mr. Herman Kumara
28. Rev. Fr. Jeyabalan Croos
29. Mr. Joe William
30. Mr. Jude Fernando
31. Mr. K. Chandra Perera
32. Mr. K.J. Brito Fernando
33. Mr. Kamal Perera
34. Ms. Kanchana Kumari
35. Mrs. Kanthi Perera
36. Mrs. Lakmali Maheshika
37. Mr. Lal Luxman
38. Mrs. Lasanthi Perera
39. Mrs. Laveena Hasanthi
40. Mr. Loyal Fernando
41. Mrs. Lucilda Perera
42. Ms. Lucille Abeykoon
43. Rev. Sr. Mahesh Fenando
44. Mr. Mahinda Namal
45. Mrs. Mallika Perera
46. Mrs. Maria Modwin
47. Ms. Marian Fernando
48. Ms. Marisa De Silva
49. Mrs. Mary Carmel
50. Ms. Melani Manel Perera
51. Mrs. Manel Perera
52. Mr. Meril Fernando
53. Rev. Sr. Milburga Fernando
54. Ms. Monica Alfred
55. Rev. Fr. Nandana
Manatunga
56. Rev. Sr. Nichola
57. Mrs. Nilangani Silva
58. Mr. Nimal Fernando
59. Mr. Nimal I. Perera
60. Mr. Nilshan Fonseka
61. Mrs. Nirmalee Perera
62. Sr. Noel Christine Fernando
63. Mrs. Olivia Fernando
64. Rev. Fr. Oswald Firth, OMI
65. Mr. Philip Setunga
66. Rev. Sr. Plasida
Lihinikaduwa
67. Mr. Pradeep Laksiri
68. Mr. Prashan Perera
69. Mrs. Princy Perera
70. Mr. Priyankara Costa
71. Mr. Priyantha Perera
72. Ms. Pujani Ramaara
73. Rev. Fr. R. Augustine
74. Mr. Ranjith Fernando
75. Sr. Rasika Peiris, HF
76. Rev. Fr. Ravichandran
Emmanuel
77. Mrs. Reeta Maheshwari
78. Rev. Fr. Reid Shelton
Fernando
79. Mrs. Rose Verginia
80. Mr. Ruki Fernando
81. Mr. Sanjeewa Fernando
82. Rev. Fr. Sarath
Iddamalgoda
83. Mrs. Shankala Cooray
84. Mrs. Shanthini Fernando
85. Rev. Sr. Shanthini Fernando
86. Rev. Fr. Sherard
Jayawardane
87. Mrs. Shirani Cooray
88. Dr. Shirley Wijesinghe
89. Mr. Shivantha Cooray
90. Mr. Stanly Perera
91. Rev. Bro. Stanley Perera
SFO
92. Mr. Sunil Perera
93. Mr. Suren D. Perera
94. Rev. Sr. Sylvia Callen
S.C.J.M
95. Rev. Fr. Terence Fernando
96. Fr.V. Yogeswaran, S.J.
97. Rev. Sr. Vijaya
98. Mr. Vincent Fernando
99. Ms. Winifrida Fernando

SRI LANKA: When shall we ever learn?



AHRC Logo

By Basil Fernando-August 2, 2016

When shall we ever learn that the nation is more important than the power quarrels and ambitions of this or that person? Last week we saw that we shall never learn. A few politicians led a crowd to the street, not for the sake of the nation but, in fact, against the very idea of the nation. Their demand was that law should not be enforced equally and impartially. No nation that is incapable or unwilling to enforce the law can be called a nation. The failure to enforce the law is a prescription for chaos. For decades now, we laid landmines on our own road to peace and normalcy by this very same failure. The new government did not heed to this lesson, and now they have placed themselves in a position in which they are unable to answer strongly that, come what may, they will enforce the law.

When shall we ever learn that JUSTICE is a hard taskmaster? Those who pursue justice must do so with complete commitment and fairness and, at the same time, swift action is a non-bargainble requirement of justice. Those who are accused of crimes, especially very serious ones, will do all they can to defeat justice, even by destroying the system of justice itself. They resist going to jail more than they would resist going to hell itself. When those who are so accused are rich and powerful persons, they will use all their power and wealth to remain out of jail. Leaving room for them to do so is to invite peril. Allowing delays to destroy successful prosecutions not only places the government at risk but the whole nation. A wise ruler always gives priority to the requirements of justice and thus prevents those who are accused of crimes from doing even more harm by remaining free.

When shall we ever learn that what all ordinary folk in the country want, above all things, is peace and quiet? They want that their little ones can go to school without being sexually abused; that women can go about without having the fear of being raped; and that each and every one can seek the assistance of the police and other law enforcement agencies without the fear that they will suffer abuses in the hands of those very same people. They want to live with whatever little they have without having to pay bribes or extortion with that little that they have. They wish to walk on the roads without the fear of an accident at any moment, however careful they are. They want to go to a hospital when they are ill with the hope that they will be received kindly, and that they will get the attention and the medicine that is required for their cure. They wish that the schools that their children go to will give the education and instruction that these children deserve, and that these children do not have to spend all their free time, including their weekends, going from one tuition class to the other in the desperate hope of not failing their exams. 

People want their drinking water to be drinkable and not to be contaminated with all kinds of chemicals that create kidney problems and other illnesses. People wish that, when they go to their little boutiques and shops to buy their rice and other basic essentials, that these, too, have not had their prices raised to unaffordable levels. The young people hope that they will have the good notes of being admitted to a job so that they could support their families and, particularly, their ailing parents. The old people want to dream that, after years of hard work, they will not have to spend their old age with the prospect of starvation or malnutrition. Little children want safe places to stay and play when both their parents have gone to work solely for the purpose of providing them with their food and clothing. These and other simple things are what people want. People elect governments for this purpose, but, each time they do so, they learn that the new governments have learned nothing from the earlier ones, and they keep repeating the very things that brought people misery. Then the so-called opposition takes to the streets, not for the purpose of bringing them those simple things that they want, but for greedy politicians to have another go at pacifying their greed.

When shall we ever learn that the people want to hear the very simple truths about their economy and the way politicians propose to solve their simple problems? But, instead, what the people hear are lies and more lies. No politicians spend even an hour to fully contemplate the ways to solve any of the problems that the people want them to solve.The politicians can only promise a pie in the sky. People know all the time that a pie in the sky is something good to think about but not something that they can ever eat. No politician ever asked why they cannot tell the people the truth. The truth about how much money there is in the treasury, how plans are made for expenditures by the central bank, what more loans will be taken and who gets the benefit of everything. Why do the politicians think that telling the truth to the people is the most harmful thing they could ever do to themselves? When will the politicians ever think that the truth that they know and the truth that people want to know are the same?

When shall we ever learn that there is nothing more harmful to the nation than living on the false hopes that the politicians and the media create, illusions that are not only putting people’s lives in peril now, but also for the future? That spinning illusions is a dangerous game because it harms the people’s capacity to think critically, even about very difficult problems that may take a long time to solve. After all, it is the capacity for critical thought that has the potential to solve the problems people face and the people are capable of making sacrifices when they know that they are doing it for a good cause rather than the pursuit of an illusion.

When shall we ever learn that people should trust only themselves and themselves alone? By following one bad politician because they are frustrated with another, they will never solve their own problems. They have to consult each other and, for that, they should talk to and listen to each other. Their energies, spent in mutual consultation, can lead to creating more clarity on what they really want and how they can achieve what they want.

When shall we ever learn from the old wisdom that says that greed is harmful, that uncontrolled anger is harmful, and that ignorance is harmful and that sloth is harmful?

To support the greed of our politicians is as harmful as the pursuit of one’s own greed. The support of political provocation from ill-intended politicians is as harmful as the pursuit of one’s own uncontrolled anger. Following ignorant politicians is as harmful as the pursuit of one’s own ignorance and blindness. The support of slothful politicians, whose sole way of promoting themselves and achieving their aims is my misleading the poor, is as harmful as people being slothful themselves.

When shall we ever learn that people have to learn to be wise if they wish to have a political system that can act wisely? That a wiser people never become followers of foolish and ambitious politicians, that they instead learn to discern where the truth is and resist all evil political schemes with all the might that they are capable of? That wisdom and enlightened resistance are inseparable? And that the wise can find solutions against all the odds that they face if they never deviate from the part of enlightened resistance, courage and perseverance?