Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

NIE Crisis: Members Sacked After Advising Ranil To Carry Out A ‘Comprehensive Review’


Colombo Telegraph
July 27, 2016
The Secretary to the Ministry of Education has sacked several members from the Council of the National Institute of Education (NIE), allegedly upon orders from the Minister of Education.
According to Nirmal Ranjith Dewasiri, along with him, Prof. Jayadeva Uyangoda, Prof. Senevi Epitawatte and Prof. Jayatillake have been sacked from the NIE Council.
Nirmal
Nirmal
Uyangoda
Uyangoda
According to Devasiri, even though the NIE Council should meet once a month, no meetings have been convened since December 2015. “During the last meeting in December there was a serious dispute between us and the then Director General and the members also informed that they cannot work with the Director General,” Dewasiri, the former President of FUTA said.
In May, Dewasiri and Uyangoda wrote to Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe urging him to carry out a comprehensive institutional review of all aspects in connection to the NIE.
In a letter addressed to Wickremesinghe, Members of the NIE Council, Jayadeva Uyangoda and Nirmal Ranjith Dewasiri, who are also senior professors of the University of Colombo also alleged that the management of the institute lacks the necessary capacity to fulfill it’s responsibilities.
“To cite the personal experience of the two of us, we have at Council meetings repeatedly offered our voluntary service to help revive the research department of the NIE, and assist launching new capacity building programmes. We have also proposed that the NIE should begin to focus on the key functions of its mandate through research, policy dialogues and greater engagement with the Ministry and the government. The response we have received so far is to continuously ignore our requests,” they said in the letter dated May 2016.
They noted that the NIE, which has been set up to function as the primary institutional link between the country’s school education and the government, with a farsighted mandate, is lacking in institutional, intellectual and managerial capacity as well as resources to fulfill its responsibilities.
“We also recognize that the NIE should not be allowed to continue to decay. It is also our view that merely changing the DG or the Council can hardly revive the NIE. The revival and revitalization of the NIE calls for a major intervention by you as the Prime Minister and by the government led by you,” they stated.
“As the first step in that direction, we would like to propose to you the need for a comprehensive institutional review of all aspects of the NIE. Such a review should include (a) updating of the need and relevance of the NIE to Sri Lanka today and tomorrow under the changing local and global conditions, (b) revisiting its existing mandate as laid down in the Act, (c) examining its functions, its organizational structure, managerial and administrative practices, (d) an assessment of its intellectual, research and other capacities, (e) human resource requirements, and (f) mapping out of its future directions. It is our view that the review committee should include (a) an international expert, preferably from UNESCO, conversant with the needs and nature of educational reforms in post-civil war and multi-ethnic societies, (b) Sri Lankan experts who have sensitivity to the challenges and role of school education in a multi-ethnic society in transition to peace and reconciliation after decades of civil war and violence,” the letter added.
We publish bellow the letter in full:
University of Colombo
Colombo -03
May 05, 2016
Honourable Ranil Wickremasinghe Esqr., M. P.
Prime Minister
Prime Minister’s Office
Temple Trees
Colombo-03
Dear Sir,
National Institute of Education-Maharagama

India and China to get special economic zones in Sri Lanka


JUL 27 2016

COLOMBO: India and China will be allotted Special Economic Zones to set up industries in Sri Lanka, the Minister for International Trade and Strategic Development, Malik Samarawickrama told reporters yesterday. 
“Indians will be setting up pharmaceutical and auto-parts industries in their zone. The Chinese have asked for 55 sq km (15, 000 acres) of land in the Hambantota area in the Southern Province for their zone, and we are in the process of acquiring the land. When developed, this area will generate one million jobs,” Samarawickrama said.
The location for the Indian SEZ is yet to be finalized.
An Indian delegation will be in the island next week to begin talks on a framework for the Economic and Technical Cooperation Agreement (ETCA).
The week after that, a Chinese delegation is expected for talks on a Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
The Sino-Sri Lanka FTA is likely to be signed in 2017.
An FTA with Singapore is also on the cards.
Minister Samarawickrama further said that one of the main goals to be attained through foreign investments is the acquisition of new technologies and skills.
Samarawickrama made it very clear that the proposed ETCA with India will not lead to the invasion of professionals from India, resulting in Sri Lankans losing their jobs.
“The government will  not allow the entry of foreign professionals except in special cases, as it is now under the Board of Investment rules,” he stressed.
“Those who say that under ETCA even barbers will come from India, are politically bankrupt people,” he remarked.
Samarawickrama said that for first time in the history of Sri Lanka, the government is consulting all chambers of commerce and professional bodies on these trade and investment pacts.
It has even told them that one of them could be included in the country’s negotiating team, he added.
The government is also in the process of formulating a National Policy on Trade Agreements, in consultation with the chambers of commerce and professional bodies including the vociferous Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA). The national policy is likely to be presented to Parliament by the end of August.
“I have asked Parliament to set up a working group of MPs to advice on the national policy. But to date, there has been no response,” Samarawickrama added.
Asked why government is going for a new agreement (ETCA) with India, when the India-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement (SLFTA) has many issues to be sorted like the Non Tariff Barriers (NTBs) in India, the Minister said that in the forthcoming talks with India “priority” will be given to sorting  out issues relating to NTBs.
“We will also ask for the total abolition of the quota for garments and the enhancement of the quota for tea. India allows only 8 million pieces of apparel per year. This is too small. Among other issues to be addressed are testing procedures and non-recognition of Sri Lankan standards,” the Minster said.
Faizer Mustapha, the Minister of Local Government and a confidante of President Maithripala Sirisena, said that the President had asked him to tell the media his government will not sign any agreement which goes against Sri Lanka’s security and national interests.
But Mustapha defended the coalition government’s policy of going in for trade and investment pacts with various countries, as these are necessary for growth.
“All countries are friendly to Sri Lanka now. That gives us a good platform to negotiate good deals. Foreign investments hinge on political relations,” Mustapha said.
He denied that there are political differences in the coalition on trade agreements.
“Belonging to different parties, we do have our differences, but we set them aside to evolve national policies,” Musthapha said.
Lasantha's killing: Suspect identified by driver

The suspect taken into custody in connection with killing of Sunday Leader Chief Editor Lasantha Wickramathunga has been identified by the man who was driving Mr. Wickramatunga's vehicle at the time he was killed. 

The suspect was today remanded till August 3 by Mount Lavinia Chief Magistrate Mohamed Sahabdeen. 

The suspect Prem Ananda Udalagama served as a staff sergeant in the army intelligence unit. He was arrested on the 15th and then remanded till the date of the identification parade.

 The witness identified the suspect at the identification parade held in the presence of the Mount Lavinia Additional Magistrate Sulochana Weerasinghe. 

Attorney Athula S. Ranagala and Kasun Apasinghe who appeared for the aggrieved party said another witness had seen the man who shot Mr. Wickramatunga and the court also permitted the CID to hold an identification parade to identify this suspect. (Dayarathna Pathirana)

In the name of sanity and reason

 

Fragments.


Posted by --Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Malinda Seneviratne has an eye for comment. He knows the political. He can debate and win and what’s more, without resorting to emotion and rhetoric. That’s rare. Consequently it’s difficult to imagine him playing second fiddle to anyone, politician or ideologue. He has his views and I don’t agree with many of them, but the fact of the matter is that he's no “lapdog”. And why? Because of the one weapon he has at his disposal whenever someone has an issue with what he’s written: reason.

A few days ago, Ranil Wickremesinghe lambasted certain journalists. He noted they’d been in the pay of the previous regime and threatened to reveal their names. This is of course not the first time and certainly not the last time he’s done such a thing. This article, however, is not about Mr Wickremesinghe or his gripe with journalists. It’s about something else.

Malinda wrote on the Prime Minister’s rant. Again, not the first time. If you peruse the articles he wrote to “The Island”, the now defunct Sunday “Lakbima”, the “Daily News”, and “The Nation”, you’ll come across so many instances where he has criticised the Prime Minister and understand why: because he knows Wickremesinghe’s CV and disagrees with his stances on issues Malinda clearly is a nationalist on. That’s not to say Mr Wickremesinghe is not a nationalist (he is), but then again there are degrees of nationalism and Malinda is ahead of most politicians (the populists of the previous regime included) on that count. This article, therefore, is about Malinda Seneviratne.

I started reading Malinda in “The Nation”. No, not when he was Editor. He was, I remember, a contributor to a weekly political column. The first thing that struck me was his nationalist thrust, something I hadn’t come across in those who wrote to English newspapers (not that there weren’t others of course). He writes with a kind of clarity his opponents can’t match. I suppose clarity tends to attract rubbish paraded as counterargument, which explains why, over the years, he’s been at the receiving end of vitriol and third-rate, below the belt comments by those who have no clue about his stances.

He has been called a Mahinda loyalist, stooge, sycophant, and shill. He has been vilified, lambasted, defamed, and debased. A lesser writer would have given up. He has not. Speaks volumes about the man, as it does about those who choose to slander and in other ways abuse him with words.

Let me come out with it. For years, he pointed out flaws in Constitutional provisions, guarantees, and amendments. For years, he argued for reform. For years, he supported the nation, not Mahinda Rajapaksa. For years, he objected to intimidation and dissected dissent. For years, he made it clear that the end of war was not the beginning of peace. For years, all this was ignored and he got a lovely title: chauvinist.

As such it’s predictable that when he calls a spade a spade with respect to the Prime Minister’s tirades, those who have an axe to grind with him will howl “Hypocrite!” The hypocrite-tag is, however, both unwarranted and uncalled for, not (only) because Malinda doesn’t deserve it, but also because using that on the dissident tends to concede power and ego to the powers that be. I’m sure everyone knows this.

No, I don’t agree with him on everything (as I pointed out before). I have issues with some of his positions. We don’t see eye to eye on certain matters. But I know one thing: he is less politically coloured than I am. More to the point, he is less politically coloured than any of us. Hardly reason for censure, wouldn’t you agree?

Moving on.

We were promised change in 2015. Change, they say, comes in different shades. Some would say point at relative merits. Others would push for perfection. I think it’s safe to say, as Tisaranee Gunasekara has, that this regime has done everything it can to be marginally superior in terms of corruption, nepotism, and venality to the Rajapaksa Regime. Telling.

Forget all this, though. Ask yourself: does the revolution end with the changing of the guard or does it live forever? “Revolution is Dissent!” Warren Beatty (acting as John Reed, the American journalist who covered the 1917 upheaval in Russia) exclaims in his film Reds. True. That’s why dissent is predicated on critique. Healthy, necessary critique. The sort that survives regime-change.

Now some will of course argue that there’s a line between critique and sycophancy. Who decides that line, though? The government? The Editor’s Guild? Malinda Seneviratne? Your neighbour? Then there’s another argument: freedom must go with responsibility. Again, who decides the parameters of that responsibility? Didn’t the Rajapaksa Regime try to do that? Didn’t they fail? And didn’t those who bring up these arguments now use to howl (by their keyboards and computer screens) whenever Rajapaksa “blanked” the media?

2015 did more than change a regime, folks. It undressed a lot of people. Those who clamoured for revolution and bayed for blood in their rush to “get” good governance became silent. Their rebellion used to be for ABSOLUTE change. Right now though, I am willing to bet, they’ll probably be content with RELATIVE merits. A totally different destination, ladies and gentleman.

True, these are still early days. We don’t really know this government’s position on the media. We can cut them some slack. At the same time though, we can guess. And we can have the likes of Malinda help us guess.

As for the Prime Minister’s tirades, they remind me of what the late S. L. Gunasekara once said. He was speaking at a seminar on the media. The year was 1997. The speaker before him was Ranil Wickremesinghe. Wickremesinghe had waxed eloquent on media freedom. The UNP was in the Opposition then. And two plus two equals four.

Here’s what S. L. said: "I think the press are somewhat paranoid when they think that all politicians hate them and want to destroy them. I disagree entirely. When the SLFP was in opposition, it loved the media in the same manner as UNP loves it now, with the enduring passion of a Romeo for his Juliet."

That was S. L. Spoke his mind. Didn’t suffer mediocrity. To the point. Brash. And politically colourless. Like Malinda.

Uditha Devapriya is a freelance writer who can be reached at udakdev1@gmail.com

‘Police Koloma’ of the ‘Idiot of a General of Police’ (IGP) at Moragahakande before president !


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 26.July.2016, 11.30PM) The IGP Poojitha Senadhibandara Jayasundara whose name is by now synonymous with ‘Police Koloma’ ( clown of the police) because of his clownish ,despicable disgraceful  behavior and lascivious propensities unbecoming of  a chief of the police force .By literally  crying wherever he goes , engaging in double speak, always hitting below the belt of the police inferiors , bum  - licking the powerful , craving for publicity, and  making obscene gestures with his two fingers before women when delivering his banal and insipid lectures  he has earned yet another name  - the ‘Idiot of a General of police’ (IGP) .
Yesterday , he performed another police koloma by conducting himself most disgracefully ,disdainfully  and clownishly before the president . 
Unfortunately it is  Lanka e news that is saddled with the thankless  task of reporting this most ugly and despicable conduct of this IGP alias the ‘Idiot of a General of police.’
At the Moragahakande-Kaluganga development project on the occasion of the National ceremony  of depositing of the treasure headed by the president and the Prime Minister (P.M.) yesterday , this ‘Idiot of a General of Police’ Poojitha in flagrant violation of protocol displaying his idiocy and imbecility , took a seat in the row in which the president and the P.M. were seated.
The seating was arranged based on the protocol . In the main stage were the president , the P.M. , cabinet ministers and deputy ministers and M.P.s.
In the second stage were the seats for the governors , chief ministers , members of the three forces , the IGP, Foreign Envoys and VIPs. Their  names too were indicated on the seats.
The IGP alias the ‘Idiot of a General of Police’ noticing that his seat is in the  second stage among the members of the  three forces, after scolding  the police officers had seen to it his  seat is moved close  to first stage where the president and P.M. were, and as usual taken  a position that would ensure his heinous face is captured by the TV cameras. By attempting this publicity gimmick he made all the VIPS around to  witness in disgust  his characteristic  ‘police koloma’ (clowning IGP)  
It is a well and widely known fact that megalomaniac Poojitha the Idiot of an IGP even during the Rajapakse era engaged  in cheap publicity and  disgraceful menial conduct . At that time at a function in Kandy attended by Mahinda Rajapakse  (president then ) Poojitha  in  his official uniform fell at his feet to worship him like a dog that crawls and cringes before its master for a discarded  bone .
 
The photographers never expected a senior  DIG in official uniform to fall at the feet that shamelessly , and therefore were not in readiness to capture that disgraceful pose . Hence their camera captured the scene only when he was rising (the photo herein depicts that scene - Poojitha toadying to Mahinda ) .
Need we say further to confirm that the lofty status , dignity and honor that are inherent in the post of an  IGP are fast decaying  with an equally  fast decomposing  IGP.
---------------------------
by     (2016-07-26 19:00:57)

Political Expediency Is Killing Our Country


Colombo Telegraph
By Vishwamithra1984 –July 27, 2016
When virtue is lost, benevolence appears, when benevolence is lost right conduct appears, when right conduct is lost, expedience appears. Expediency is the mere shadow of right and truth; it is the beginning of disorder.” ~Lao Tzu
It is no longer sensible to be sensible. It is no longer reasonable to be reasonable. Whatever we do must be related to the consequences that our deeds entail. They must be directly relatable to the effects, good or bad, redeemable or irredeemable and rectifiable or not, of action we took. Any deviation or oblivion that we might show in the face of unfathomable odds should not be given a scrap of a chance to succeed. In order to avert a much more alarming and tragic calamity, we must act now and abandon this all-consuming political correctness and confront the obvious. The mindset that entraps the underlings of nuanced behavior and calculated responses, especially from politicians, is indeed a very damaging feature of our processes of political action. It has not only entrapped a free and liberated cascade of thoughts and ideals, it has enslaved the very elements of creative genius which has produced many a marvel in our ancient times.Mahinda
But there was a time that being politically incorrect was way too frequent and far too atrocious. That was during the last regime of the Rajapaksas. They did not have time for political correctness. Their plans were devoid of political correctness, their executions displayed unfathomable depths of callousness; a total disregard for all that had been held lofty and sacred. That was the other extreme. This bigoted set of politicians let loose their political kith and kin robed in saffron who were armed with the Pali stanzas of the Dharma and fortified and shielded by the official security forces of the country. Patriotism was the theme and sovereignty of the nation was the bedrock of their vicious campaign. Eighteenth Century English writer Samuel Johnson wrote that ‘patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel’ but it is the Nineteenth Century’s Irish poet and playwright, Oscar Wilde who paraphrased the quotation of Johnson and reaffirmed the inherent sardonicism of the saying. He, Wilde, declared that ‘patriotism is a virtue of the vicious’.

Rilagala range in danger because of Southern Express Highway


rilagala 1rilagala 4
rilagala 2Rilagala range in danger because of Southern Express Highway

Jul 27, 2016
The Rilagala mountain range protection unity has added that they will not allow rubble to be extracted from the Rilagala mountain range when the Southern Express Highway is extended beyond Matara.
This organization has cautioned as they have come to know that the authorities of the road construction company are hoping to obtain rubble from the mountain range of Rilagala.
 
In this connection a media briefing had been held in Colombo where the secretary of the Rilagala mountain range protection unity Mahesh Sampath had expressed.
 
In the decade of 1940 the Rilagala mountain range had been classified as a preserved mountain as a region connected to the Mahamaya mountain region. Another threat is that to the vicinity of the mountain range there is a waterway in which there is a hereditary type ornamental fish which have been recorded in ancient books. In the event a damage is made to the mountain range there is a threat to the fish as well as the trees which are around the range.
 
The coordinating environmentalist Ravindra Kariyawasam of the environmental and nature educating institution speaking at the media briefing had added that in the context of the above there is a definite hazard to the hereditary fish and trees. If the authorities commence the exercise of extracting the rubble in the mountain range would also flout not only the environment act but also the fauna and flora acts

‘Financial firms 300% more prone to hacking than businesses in other industries worldwide’

article_image









by Sanath Nanayakkare-July 26, 2016, 7:12 pm

Hackers target financial service firms 300 percent more than businesses in other industries, Praveen Sasidharan-Director Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu said in Colombo on Monday.

Sasidharan said this during his presentation at a workshop on Cybersecurity at the Taj Samudra Hotel in Colombo.

SJMS Associates, an independent correspondent firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, hosted this Cyber risk event in Colombo with participation from key banks and financial institutions in Sri Lanka. The event was aimed at raising awareness on rising cyber threats in the financial services sector and sharing best practices for cyber risk preparedness.

Sasidharan pointed out that companies in the financial services sector should evolve into a progressive cyber risk management paradigm that strives to achieve three fundamental qualities.

"The three key qualities are; being secure against known threats through risk-driven investment in foundational, preventive controls, and policies, being vigilant by improving the ability to detect emerging threats and anomalous patterns amid the highly complex and data-saturated environment; and being resilient to enable the organization to recover from attacks as quickly as possible and minimize both direct and indirect damages, he explained.

A. K. Viswanathan, Partner, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP elaborated on the need for cyber security in the context of the financial services sector in Sri Lanka. "Technology trends and a shift to digital business, accompanied with the revolution in smart systems have caused a massive re-positioning of the financial services market from a fundamentally labour-based model to an automated process-driven business model. Financial institutions are also under increasing scrutiny from their regulators who are changing their approach to cyber security by transforming it from an IT discussion to a risk, business and board level discussion, he said.

"Further, cyberattacks on this sector and its customers are on the rise; birthed primarily by internet and mobile enabled banking services. Sri Lanka's steadily increasing mobile penetration and low barriers to internet usage increase vulnerabilities for banks and its customers, he said.

Basheer Ismail, Managing Partner, SJMS Associates, added; "Through our 40 years in providing professional services in the Sri Lankan market, we have served a vast range of companies on their assurance and advisory requirements. Our successful track record combined with Deloitte's high quality service capability and expertise in the risk advisory space presents a winning combination to set new benchmarks of cyber preparedness amongst companies in Sri Lanka."

Conspiracy to free Duminda Silva in Bharatha Lakshman murder case by Sarath Silva: Black money rides the high horse !

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -26.July.2016, 8.15PM) A ‘courts conspiracy’ is being hatched to get R. Duminda Silva the accused in the murder of Bharatha Lakshman freed and exonerated of all charges, based on Lanka e news courts inside information division reports.
This case was heard by a special panel of three High court judges is now  concluded, and  the verdict is pending now. The judges who comprised the  panel  were ,  Shiran Gunaratne ( president) , Padmini Ranawake Gunatileke and M.C.B.N. Moraes .
Behind this conspiracy is most infamously famous  ex chief justice (CJ) Sarath N . De Silva and Shiran Gunaratne , president of the panel who became a  judge with the patronage of the former . Shiran being  a direct  ardent follower of notorious Silva , he has  decided already to free Duminda Silva at the behest of Sarath N Silva.
The views  of the other two judges being  most important in respect of this decision, already intense pressures have been brought to bear on judge Padmini Ranawake deploying the ‘black monies’ of  infamous  ex CJ and equally notorious ex M.P. Duminda Silva. Padmini  however  is still on the fence and vacillating .
Judge Moraes on the other hand has already decided that Duminda Silva is guilty. Yet since the final verdict is hinged on the majority decision of the judges , the decision of Padmini is most crucial to the  two  Silvas , and her value has tremendously shot up to them .
The verdict in this case is to be delivered in the first week of September
---------------------------
by     (2016-07-26 15:02:12)

Nirmalee's Strategy Backfires on APL (Great Betrayal by her paid Servants)

Nirmalee's Strategy Backfires on APL (Great Betrayal by her paid Servants)

Jul 27, 2016

Dr. Chris Nonis's Sister Mrs. Nirmalee Samarathunga tried another monkey trick by using ex Agalawatte Plantation employees, (disgruntled, sacked and retired old codgers) against Chris, for her smear campaign.

She has used one former chief clerk namely Solomon ( Tamil preacher from a unorthodox Christian church) promising him a GM's post once she grabs the power of APL.
 
She paid Ricky Mendis 's money and sent Solomon to Ratnapura to pay few corrupted Staff in Ratnapura Estates to stage protests against Dr Nonis' s Management.
 
Solomon had paid some CESU union members and formed a society called " Agalawatte Surekeeme Samithiya" which is not a trade union. These Corrupted CESU members tried to get the other workers and staff from Nuwara Eliya and Kalutara Districts, employees also to join them but those grateful and loyal employees had told them and Solomon to get lost and did not support Nirmalee.
 
This ungrateful Old folk, had even managed to muster the support of an another Corrupted ex Superintendent Who had to leave before sacking due to womanising and misappropriation of Company Assets. They had promised him the post of CEO when Nirmalee becomes the Chairperson.
 
Solomon had paid her over Rs. 2 Mn. To this CC to arrange buses, meals and liquor to stage a protest, 2 weeks before in front of APL head office.
 
However Chris had outfoxed Nirmalee by Selling Agalawatte to Ishara. 
 
She got shocked and instructed Soloman to instigate the Ratnapura Estates Staff even against the new owners. As a result when the new owners went to take inventories, this staff objected them coming in by burning tyres and hoisting black flags etc. 
Immediately the management lodged police complaint against the staff members who involved and suspended five of them. By now these had become a headache to the CESU Union by defying orders.
 
On suspension those staff members including the woman who had clandestine affair with the ex planter like dogs came down on their knees and begged for their jobs from the new owners.
 
They came to the new owners (Browns Capital) head office and cried. On humanitarian grounds they were severely warned and taken back to work. They did this by Back stabbing Nirmalee, Solomon and the other fellow who was dreaming to become a CEO.
 
Once again Nirmalee is at sea. Let's wait and see to report her next vicious move. Most importantly we feel sorry for Solomon and his cahoots for their unfulfilled dream. Also he better ask Nirmalee for some more money to protect him from the obvious lawsuits against him for defamation.
 
CESU Insider

US labor board affirms union’s right to boycott Israel

The United Electrical Workers backed BDS in a vote of delegates at the union’s August 2015 national convention in Baltimore. (via Facebook)

Ali Abunimah-25 July 2016

The National Labor Relations Board has reaffirmed its dismissal of charges against the United Electricalworkers union because of its support for the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions movement.

The NLRB is the US federal agency that enforces the country’s trade union legislation.
In August 2015, the 30,000-strong United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, known as UE, became only the second national trade union in the US to back BDS by a vote of delegates at its annual convention in Baltimore.

In October, Shurat HaDin, a lawfare group with ties to Israel’s Mossad spying and assasination agency, filed acomplaint against the union, claiming that its support for BDS amounted to a violation of the law against secondary boycotts.

In January, the labor board dismissed the complaint, stating it had investigated and found “there is insufficient evidence to establish a violation” of the law.

Shurat HaDin appealed the dismissal, but on 26 May the labor board’s general counsel issued a letter that the union says reaffirms the earlier decision to throw the case out.

Victory for BDS

UE national president Peter Knowlton welcomed the decision in a press release on Friday.

Knowlton said that UE had in the past “withstood attempts by the US government to silence us during the McCarthy era in the 1950s,” and was “unbowed by the latest attempt of a surrogate of the Israeli government to stifle our call for justice for Palestinian and Israeli workers.”

“The NLRB’s decision is a victory for the growing BDS movement across the US, which faces increasing political attempts to silence and intimidate critics of the Israeli government,” he added.

“As Americans who have a constitutional right to criticize our own government, we certainly have a right to criticize and, if we choose, boycott a foreign government that is heavily subsidized by US taxpayers,” Knowlton said.

The NLRB decision will encourage rank and file members in other unions who are battling bosses for the right to express and organize support for Palestinian rights.

The UE resolution that Shurat HaDin tried and failed to overturn calls on the US to end all military aid to Israel and for pressure on Israel “to end the occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem and the siege of Gaza and negotiate a peace agreement on the basis of equality, democracy and human rights for the Palestinian and Israeli people, including Palestinian self-determination and the right of return for refugees.”

Frivolous lawsuits

Unable to stem the growing grassroots support for Palestinian rights, and particularly the BDS movement, Israel and its surrogates have increasingly turned to repressive legislation and litigation.
Last month, Brooke Goldstein explained that the purpose of such lawsuits was to “make the enemy pay” – that “enemy” being comprised of practically anyone who organizes for Palestinian rights.

Goldstein, director of the Lawfare Project, a pro-Israel group founded with the support of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, has also asserted that “there’s no such thing as a Palestinian person.”

In April, several plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the American Studies Association, aimed at forcing it to undo its 2013 vote to boycott Israeli institutions.

John K. Wilson, an editor of Academe Blog, a publication of the American Association of University Professors,described the lawsuit as “frivolous litigation designed for the sole purpose of getting the government to suppress the freedom of speech of a private organization.”

But just this month, a one-person outfit called the Zionist Advocacy Center filed yet another frivolous lawsuit on behalf of plaintiffs who are not even members of the American Studies Association.

Radhika Sainath, an attorney for the legal advocacy group Palestine Legal, told Inside Higher Ed that the complaint is “a meritless lawsuit based on a hypothetical injury that will be thrown out of court in a heartbeat.”

Revealed: the £1bn of weapons flowing from Europe to Middle East

AK-47s, machine guns, explosives and more travel along new arms pipeline from Balkans to countries known to supply Syria

Jabhat al-Nusra fighters carry assault rifles as they move towards their positions during an offensive to take Ariha, Syria, in May 2015. Photograph: Ammar Abdullah/Reuters--Free Syrian Army fighters prepare to launch a mortar. Photograph: Reuters
The Serbian prime minister, Aleksandar Vučić. Photograph: Regis Duvignau/Reuters

Ivan Angelovski in Belgrade, Miranda Patrucic in Sarajevo and Lawrence Marzouk in London-Wednesday 27 July 2016

Eastern European countries have approved the discreet sale of more than €1bn of weapons in the past four years to Middle Eastern countries that are known to ship arms to Syria, an investigation has found. 

Thousands of assault rifles such as AK-47s, mortar shells, rocket launchers, anti-tank weapons and heavy machine guns are being routed through a new arms pipeline from the Balkans to the Arabian peninsula and countries bordering Syria.

The suspicion is that much of the weaponry is being sent into Syria, fuelling the five-year civil war, according to a team of reporters from the Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN) and the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP).

Arms export data, UN reports, plane tracking, and weapons contracts examined during a year-long investigation reveal how the munitions were sent east from Bosnia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Montenegro, Slovakia, Serbia and Romania.

Since the escalation of the Syrian conflict in 2012, the eight countries have approved €1.2bn (£1bn) of weapons and ammunition exports to Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates and Turkey – key arms markets for Syria and Yemen.

In the past, the region had virtually no track record of buying from central and eastern Europe. But purchases appear to be escalating, with some of the biggest deals approved in 2015.

Arms export licences were granted despite fears from experts and within governments that the weapons could end up with the Syrian armed opposition, arguably in breach of national, EU and other international agreements.

Eastern and central European weapons and ammunition, identified from videos and photos posted on social media, are now being used by western-backed Free Syrian Army units, but are also in the hands of fighters from Islamist groups such as Ansar al-Sham, the al Qaeda-affiliatedJabhat al-Nusra, Islamic State, factions fighting for the Syrian president, Bashar-al-Assad, and by Sunni forces in Yemen.

Markings on some of the ammunition identifying the origin and date of manufacture reveal significant quantities have come off production lines as recently as 2015.

Responding to the findings of the investigation, Patrick Wilcken, an arms control researcher at Amnesty International, and Bodil Valero, the European parliament’s rapporteur on arms, said at least some of the transfers probably breached EU, international and national laws on arms exports.

“The evidence points towards systematic diversion of weapons to armed groups accused of committing serious Human Rights Violations,” said Wilcken. “If this is the case, the transfers are illegal under … international law and should cease immediately.”

Origins of the trade route

The weapons pipeline opened in the winter of 2012, when dozens of cargo planes, loaded with Saudi-purchased Yugoslav-era weapons and ammunition, began leaving Zagreb bound for Jordan. Soon after, the first footage of Croatian weapons emerged from Syria.

Croatia’s government has consistently denied any part in shipping weapons to Syria, but Robert Stephen Ford, the US ambassador to Syria between 2011 and 2014, said Zagreb had concluded a deal in 2012 that the Saudis bankrolled.

This was just the beginning. Arms dealers in eastern Europe procured assets from their own countries and brokered the sale of ammunition from Ukraine and Belarus, even attempting to secure Soviet-made anti-tank systems bought from the UK.

Since 2012, BIRN and OCCRP say, €806m worth of weapons and ammunition exports were approved by the eastern European countries to Saudi Arabia, citing national and EU arms export reports and government sources.

Jordan secured €155m worth of export licences in this period, the investigators say, while the UAE acquired €135m and Turkey €87m, bringing the total for those four years to just under €1.2bn.
In a confidential document obtained by BIRN and OCCRP from November 2013, a senior official at Serbia’s defence ministry revealed concerns that deliveries to Saudi Arabia would be diverted to Syria.

Jeremy Binnie, the Middle East arms expert for the publication Jane’s Defence Weekly, said: “The militaries of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and the UAE and Turkey use western infantry weapons and ammunition, rather than Soviet-designed counterparts. It consequently seems likely that large shipments of such materiel being acquired by – or sent to – those countries are destined for their allies in Syria, Yemen and Libya.”

The weapons are delivered by air and by sea. By tracking the movement of aircraft and ships, BIRN and OCCRP were able to follow the flow of arms in real time.

Detailed analysis of airport timetables, cargo carrier history, flight tracking data and air traffic control sources helped pinpoint almost 70 flights that very likely carried weapons to Middle Eastern conflicts in the past year.

Belgrade, Sofia and Bratislava emerged as the main hubs for the airlift. Serbia’s aviation authority confirmed that 49 of the flights were transporting weapons in a response to a freedom of information request.

EU flight statistics provide further evidence of the scale of the operation. They reveal that planes from Bulgaria and Slovakia have delivered thousands of tonnes of unidentified cargo since the summer of 2014 to the same military bases in Saudi Arabia and the UAE pinpointed by BIRN and OCCRP.

Arms bought by the Saudis, Turks, Jordanians and the UAE for Syria are routed through two secret command hubs – called military operation centres (MOCs) – in Jordan and Turkey, according to Ford.
The weapons are then transported by road to the Syrian border or airdropped by military planes. The Saudis are also known to have airdropped materiel, including what appeared to be Serbia-made assault rifles, to their allies in Yemen.

“Each of the countries involved in helping the armed opposition retained final decision-making authority about which groups in Syria received assistance,” Ford said.

The Saudis and Turks are also known to have provided weapons directly to Islamist groups not supported by the US and who, in some cases, are fighting MOC-backed factions.

Washington has also bought and delivered large quantities of military materiel from central and eastern Europe for the Syrian opposition in an attempt to counter the spread of Isis.

Since December 2015, three cargo ships commissioned by the US military’s Special Operations Command (Socom), in charge of the covert supply of weapons to Syria, have left Black Sea ports in the Balkans for the Middle East, according to American procurement documents and ship tracking data.

Some 4,700 tonnes of Warsaw Pact weaponry – including heavy machine guns, rocket launchers and anti-tank weapons, as well as bullets, mortars, grenades, rockets and other explosives – have been delivered from Bulgaria and Romania to military facilities in Jordan and Turkey, according to procurement documents and ship tracking data. The latest US-chartered ship left Bulgaria on 21 June carrying about 1,700 tonnes of the same materiel to an unidentified Red Sea port.

SOCOM said in a statement the “munitions are to support Special Operations and its missions worldwide.
“We will not confirm types of equipment which may be used for training and equipping partnered foreign forces in support of Special Operations missions.”

Two weeks after a March 2016 delivery, Kurdish groups published on Twitter and Facebook a photo of a warehouse piled with ammunition boxes in northern Syria, claiming to have received a supply of US-brokered weapons.

Reading the fine print

End-user certificates – official documents drawn up when receiving an export licence – issued by the Saudi defence ministry to a Serbian arms dealer, as well as a cache of contracts obtained by BIRN and OCCRP, revealed the scope of the buy-up for Syrian beneficiaries.

It ranged from hundreds of ageing T-55 and T-72 tanks to millions of rounds of ammunition, multi-launch missile systems and rocket launchers, although it is not clear what was delivered. Weapons and ammunition listed include materiel from the former Yugoslavia, Belarus, Ukraine and Czech Republic, much of which is present in large quantities in Syria.

An export licence issued to a Slovakian company in January 2015 granted it the right to transport thousands of rocket-propelled grenade launchers, heavy machine guns and almost a million bullets worth €32m. The materiel was, again, produced across eastern Europe.

The Serbian prime minister, Aleksandar Vučić, said at a press conference in June that his country could increase production fivefold and still not meet the demand for arms. “Unfortunately in some parts of the world they are at war more than ever and everything you produce, on any side of the world you can sell it,” he said.

Secrecy surrounding arms deals and a dearth of publicly available data means that the exact items being delivered to the Middle East are often unknown, but evidence collected, including UN and national arms export reports and weapons contracts, reveals that much of it is Cold War-era weaponry not in use by the militaries of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, UAE or Turkey.

BIRN and OCCRP’s analysis of social media shows Czechoslovak, Yugoslav, Serbian, Croatian and Bulgarian weapons being used in training and on the battlefields of Syria, Yemen and Libya.

A Free Syrian Army commander from Aleppo, who asked to remain anonymous to protect his safety, told BIRN and OCCRP that weapons from central and eastern Europe were distributed from centrally controlled headquarters. “We don’t care about the country of the origin we just know it is from eastern Europe,” he said.

He said groups fighting pro-Assad forces rather than Isis were struggling to access arms. “If you say that you are fighting Isis you will get whatever you want but if you say that you are fighting against the regime no one cares about you.”

Arms trade experts have told BIRN and OCCRP that sales of weapons to Saudi Arabia and other countries supplying Syrian rebels are likely to be in breach of national and EU law, as well as the international Arms Trade Treaty. But no clear sanctions mechanism exists to punish countries that do not meet these legally binding agreements.

Valero told BIRN and OCCRP that countries exporting weapons to Saudi Arabia from eastern Europe should feel ashamed.

She said EU member states – such as Czech Republic, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia – are bound by the union’s common position on arms exports, while candidate countries also must align with the rules. This requires governments to carry out risk assessments on the likelihood of weapons being diverted to conflict zones and non-state actors.

“Countries selling arms to Saudi Arabia or the Middle East region are not carrying out good risk assessments and as a result are in breach of EU and national law,” she said. “I think these countries could be taken to the European Court of Justice.”

Darko Kihalic, the head of the Croatia’s arms licensing department at the Ministry of Economy, told BIRN and OCCRP that Zagreb follows the legally binding EU Common Position on arms exports and other international treaties.

Kihalic dismissed media reports that showed Croatian weapons were ending up in war zones saying it did not constitute proof. But asked whether he was aware that Croatian weapons bought by Saudi Arabia were turning up in Syria, he said: “There is nothing more for us to check as the document says that their ministry of defence or police forces will use it [the weapon] and that they won’t resell it or export it.”

Saudi Arabia is not a “blacklisted” country, he said. “Are there misuses? There probably are.”

Valero and Wilcken, from Amnesty International, strongly opposed this view.

“All these states do have clear, legally binding responsibilities to stop the transfer of arms where there is a risk that they will be used for serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law, and to take mitigating measures to prevent diversion to unauthorised end users,” said Wilcken.

In March, the Netherlands became the first EU country to stop arms exports to Saudi Arabia, citing mass execution and civilian deaths in Yemen.

Additional reporting by Lindita Cela, Jelena Cosic, Jelena Svircic, Atanas Tchobanov, Dusica Tomovic and Pavla Holcova.