Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, July 22, 2016

Those who should be in hospitals invite us to topple governments


THURSDAY, 21 JULY 2016

The leaders of Mahinda faction of the SLFP talk about toppling the government to develop the country but they are a sick lot that should be in hospitals instead of talking about developing the country says the General Secretary of the JVP Tilvin Silva.
Mr. Tilvin Silva made these remarks addressing a seminar held at Karandeniya by the JVP under the theme “Debt burden, Tax burden and the collapsing economy”. The JVP is holding a series of seminars under this theme throughout the island.
“As soon as Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa’s son is remanded he gets down a special mattress claiming he has a back pain. He becomes aware that he has a back pain that prevents him from sleeping on the floor only when he is remanded. How could such sick people with back pains topple a government?
Next Mr. Basil Rajapaksa is remanded. Where does he go as soon as he goes to the remand prison?  He gets a severe chest ailment. These are the people who call others to topple governments. They who should be in hospitals call us to topple governments and develop the country,” said the General Secretary of the JVP.

Thursday, July 21, 2016

Signature faked in Sri Ranga’s B report! 

Largest ever cocaine haul seized




2016-07-21

The largest ever detection of cocaine, weighing 274 kilograms and valued at around Rs. 4.1 billion, was made this evening. It had been found inside a container of sugar in the Peliyagoda container yard, police said.

 Police Media Division director, DIG Priyantha Jayakody said the container was seized by the Police Narcotics Bureau (PNB). 

He said there was another suspicious container in the yard and it was to be inspected. Police said the cocaine consignment had been brought to the country from Brazil. 

PNB director SSP Kamal Silva said the street value of a kilogram of cocaine was around Rs. 15 million.

 Prior to this, approximately 91 kilos of cocaine (valued at Rs.2 billion), also brought from Brazil, had been found hidden inside a container of sugar by the Police Special Task Force (STF) in the Orugodawatta Container yard on June 14.

 A businessman and two wharf clerks were arrested; and the cocaine was taken into custody. The businessman had been a sugar importer for some 40 years and had declared the goods in the container to be sugar. 

Police said yesterday's raid was carried out following information given by a businessman recently under interrogation. The businessman is at present in PNB custody in connection with a previous cocaine detection.

 The PNB are conducting further investigations under the direction of PNB director SSP Kamal Silva. (Chaturanga Pradeep and Darshana Sanjeewa)

Islamic State given 48 hours to leave Syria's Manbij by US-backed SDF forces

An SDF fighter walks past destroyed building near IS-held Manbij (AFP)
Syrian boy holds leaflet dropped by Syrian Democratic Forces alliance plane reading in Arabic: "The will of the Syrian people will break the chains of the terrorists" as US-backed Kurdish and Arab fighters advance into IS-held Manbij region (AFP)
Ultimatum follows public outrage after 56 civilians reportedly killed in US-led airstrikes on Tuesday

Thursday 21 July 2016 

US-backed fighters on Thursday gave the Islamic State (IS) group 48 hours to leave the battleground Syrian town of Manbij, after US-led air strikes nearby killed scores of people reported to be civilians.

The 48-hour ultimatum was issued by the Arab-Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), who are fighting IS with coalition air support.

The SDF has been waging a major campaign since June to oust IS from Manbij, in Aleppo province, with US-led air support.

The deadline follows a major backlash after reports that at least 56 civilians, including children, were killed in air strikes by the coalition near Manbij on Tuesday.

"In order to protect civilian lives and property and to protect the town from destruction we announce that we accept the initiative under which besieged IS members would leave with their individual light weapons," said the Manbij Military Council, part of the SDF.

"This initiative is the last remaining chance for besieged members of Daesh (IS) to leave the town."
An SDF commander said the initiative was first floated last week by tribal leaders in Manbij, which is a key IS bastion.

"But we took this decision now after IS used residents as human shields, after the media pressure on us, and to protect whatever civilians are left in the town," he said on condition of anonymity.

The statement also urged civilians to try to leave Manbij or distance themselves from areas where clashes are taking place.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based monitor, said the civilians killed on Tuesday were villagers fleeing fighting in Tukhar, 14 kilometres from Manbij.

On Thursday afternoon, the Observatory reported quiet in Manbij, though it was unclear if the calm was temporary or in response to the SDF's ultimatum.

Earlier in the day, the monitor had reported additional US-led air strikes and it said the SDF had advanced inside the town overnight.

Rules of engagement

A monitoring group said the US-led coalition appeared to have loosened its rules of engagement in Syria, putting civilian lives at greater risk.

The London-based Airwars group said the coalition had conducted "intense" raids targeting IS militants around Manbij, including Tuesday's deadly attack in nearby Tuhkar.

That raid came after what has been described as the "worst week" in two years of the coalition campaign in Syria, with at least 55 civilians reported killed around Manbij in the week of 11 July to 18 July. 

The US has promised to investigate the civilian deaths, but Airwars said many more civilians may die as a result of an apparent shift in the US-led coalition's policies of engagement. It also said the coalition may be seriously under-reporting civilian deaths caused by its bombs.

Chris Woods, director of Airwars, told Middle East Eye on Thursday: “We are seeing very intense air strikes on built-up urban areas where significant numbers of civilians are trapped.

“Unfortunately, that has been shown time and again to be a recipe for high civilian casualties. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing around Manbij.

“But in Manbij the number of these events is far higher than what we’ve seen. That concerns us because we think the coalition may have loosened the parameters for their air strikes, putting civilians at greater risk."

The group also said that evidence gathered from witnesses, local activists and news reports suggests that the coalition's official death tolls are often hugely under-reported.

Airwars said as many as 190 civilians may have died around Manbij since the coalition and its Kurdish-Arab allies in the SDF launched the offensive against IS.

The coalition has significantly curbed its activities around the town since Tuesday's strike in Tuhkar. Reported strikes fell from 18 between Monday and Tuesday to just five between Tuesday and Wednesday.

“This appears to be an immediate response [by the US], and is certainly welcome from the perspective of civilians,” Woods said.

The SDF confirmed this week that it had provided intelligence for a coalition strike on Tuhkar on Tuesday, but has denied that any civilians were killed in the bombing.

That is contradicted by local activists who say relatives were struggling to find safe places to bury victims, with some forced to use mass graves.

US promises investigation

The US has said it is “aware” of reports of civilian casualties in Syria this week, and has promised a “transparent” investigation.

"We’re aware of reports of civilian casualties,” Defence Secretary Ash Carter said on Wednesday.

“We’ll investigate these reports and continue to do all we can to protect civilians,” he continued. “Being transparent about this issue is a reflection of the civilized nature of this coalition.” 

Woods said the US has dragged its feet on investigations and under-reports civilian deaths caused by coalition attacks by as much as 95 percent.

“The coalition claims to have killed just 41 civilians; we think that figure is hopelessly unrealistic.”
Airwars said it took on average six months between an attack and any public admission by commanders, meaning there will probably be no confirmation of Tukhar or Manbij until well into next year.

The coalition said it has carried out 450 air raids around Manbij since the SDF imposed its siege on the town two months ago.

UN data from Afghanistan indicates that every 11th airstrike there results in a civilian death, while official White House data from operations in countries including Yemen and Pakistan show that, on average, one civilian is killed for every seven raids.

A spokesman for Inherent Resolve, the coalition's Syrian operation, told MEE: "Coalition airstrikes are the most precise in the history of warfare. Mitigating civilian casualties is a key component of the air campaign and is why we use precision weapons. 

"We apply very rigorous standards in our targeting process to avoid or to minimize civilian casualties.
"We take all reports of non-combatant casualties seriously and assess all incidents as thoroughly as possible. It's important to note that the current environment in Syria makes investigating allegations extremely challenging.

"Until these investigations and associated processes are completed, it is inappropriate to discuss details.

"We have seen [IS] using more civilians as human shields in the Manbij area.  We've seen them during the Manbij fight pushing civilians toward the lines of [allied forces] to try to draw fire.  

"While the investigative process will provide details on this particular incident, and we don't know what happened, we won't be surprised if this is somehow a factor."

International protests

Syrian activists called for international protests over the incident, and local demonstrations have already been held inside Syria.

The opposition Syrian National Coalition on Wednesday urged the US-led anti-IS alliance to halt its strikes to allow a thorough investigation into what it termed a "massacre".

Coalition president Anas al-Abdah said the alliance was responsible for the "crimes" in Manbij, which he said killed at least 125 civilians.

And there has also been international consternation, with the UN children's agency UNICEF saying it had received reports as many as 20 children might have been killed in the incident.

"No matter where they are in Syria or under whose control they live, absolutely nothing justifies attacks on children," said UNICEF's Syria representative, Hanaa Singer.

Rights group Amnesty International also expressed alarm and demanded "a prompt, independent and transparent investigation."

Elsewhere in Syria

Elsewhere in the country, the Observatory said at least 51 civilians had been killed in bombardment of rebel-held areas.

It said at least 13 people, including three children, were killed in government air strikes and shelling on the Eastern Ghouta area outside the capital Damascus.

Another 23 people were killed in strikes in Idlib province, though it was not clear if they were carried out by the government or its Russian ally.

Government bombardments also hit two neighbourhoods of the rebel-held east of Aleppo city, where 15 people were killed, among them six children, the Observatory said.

Opposition-held neighbourhoods of Aleppo have been effectively under siege for the past two weeks, after government forces severed the only remaining supply route into the east of the city.

The UN on Thursday called for a weekly 48-hour truce in Aleppo to allow aid deliveries to the besieged east.

Jan Egeland, the head of the UN-backed humanitarian taskforce for Syria, warned that more than 200,000 people in eastern Aleppo were "on the brink of starvation".

"Humanitarian convoys are ready, humanitarian workers are ready. We have the supplies. We need a break in the fighting," he said.

India to consider alternatives to pellet gun use in Kashmir - Rajnath Singh

Indian policemen stand next to a burning handcart set on fire by demonstrators during a protest in Srinagar against the recent killings in Kashmir, July 18, 2016. REUTERS/Danish Ismail
Indian policemen stand next to a burning handcart set on fire by demonstrators during a protest in Srinagar against the recent killings in Kashmir, July 18, 2016.REUTERS/DANISH ISMAIL

BY FAYAZ BUKHARI-Thu Jul 21, 2016



India plans to reconsider the use of pellet guns by security forces when controlling crowds, its home minister said on Thursday, after widespread resort to the weapons caused multiple casualties and stirred public anger.

Home Minister Rajnath Singh told lawmakers the government would set up a panel to look for an alternative to the pellet gun in response to questions about responses to a recent surge of violence in the Kashmir region.

Dr. Kaisar Ahmad, Principal at Government Medical College Srinagar, told Reuters that over 280 people had been treated for pellet injuries since July 9 when violence broke out in Kashmir during protests sparked by the death of a separatist militant.

In his talk with lawmakers, Singh said one person had been killed from pellet shots in the most recent violence in India's only Muslim-majority state, bringing the total number of deaths from the weapon in Kashmir to seven since 2010.

In addition, 53 had suffered eye injuries in the past six years, Singh said. "It is a fact that people were injured by the use of non-lethal weapons," Singh told lawmakers.

"We will form an expert committee on this that will give its report in two months so that such incidents are not repeated in future."

Amnesty International this week asked the Indian government to prohibit the use of pellet-firing shotguns during street demonstrations, saying that police should look for "less harmful" devices.

Though meant to be a non-lethal weapon, a senior police officer told Reuters that security forces are often forced to use pellet guns at close range to protect themselves against mob attacks.

Insha Malik, a 15-year-old student, was hit in her eyes by pellets when she was watching protests from the window of her house in the South Kashmiri town of Shopian. Her father, Mushtaq Ahmad, says she will never see again.

"She often asks me about her regaining her eyesight. I tell her a lie (to console her) that she will, but it will take time," he said.

(Additional reporting by Manoj Kumar; Editing by Rafael Nam/Mark Heinrich)

Charles Kinsey was trying to calm down an autistic patient who had run away from his North Miami assisted living facility when police arrived. A bystander filmed their interactions on July 18, before Kinsey was shot. (Courtesy Hilton Napoleon)


 

Police in South Florida shot an unarmed black caretaker Monday as he tried to help his autistic patient.
Charles Kinsey was trying to retrieve a young autistic man who had wandered away from an assisted living facility and was blocking traffic when Kinsey was shot by a North Miami police officer.
The North Miami Police Department said they were responding to a call about an armed man threatening suicide, but they have released few other details about the shooting itself.
In cellphone footage of the incident that emerged Wednesday, Kinsey can be seen lying on the ground with his hands in the air, trying to calm the autistic man and defuse the situation seconds before he is shot.
“All he has is a toy truck in his hand,” Kinsey can be heard saying in the video as police officers with semiautomatic rifles hide behind telephone poles approximately 30 feet away.
“That’s all it is,” the caretaker says. “There is no need for guns.”
Seconds later, off camera, one of the officers fired his weapon three times.
A bullet tore through Kinsey’s right leg.
Florida police are investigating the case of a black therapist who was shot in the leg by a North Miami police officer July 19, while trying to calm an autistic man in the middle of the street. (WSVN-TV/AP)

Kinsey said he was stunned by the shooting.
“I was thinking as long as I have my hands up … they’re not going to shoot me,” he told local television station WSVN from his hospital bed.
“Wow, was I wrong.”
Kinsey said he was even more stunned by what happened afterward, when police handcuffed him and left him bleeding on the pavement for “about 20 minutes.”
His attorney called the video “shocking.”
“There is no reason to fire your weapon at a man who has his hands up and is trying to help,” Hilton Napoleon told The Washington Post in a telephone interview Wednesday night.
Napoleon called for the department to fire the officer.
North Miami is a city of about 62,000 people that sits on Biscayne Bay, tucked between the much larger cities of Miami and Fort Lauderdale.
Gary Eugene, the city’s police chief, was appointed to the position just a month before the shooting. He had joined the department in 2013 following his retirement from the Miami police force, where he spent nearly three decades.
“I realize there are many questions about what happened Monday night,” Eugene said during a news conference Thursday. “We all have questions. … I assure you, we’ll get all the answers.”
Eugene said he had asked the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to investigate the shooting, and a spokeswoman for that agency confirmed Thursday morning that it had launched an investigation.
“Bringing in an outside agency shows our commitment to transparency and objectivity in a very sensitive matter,” Eugene said.
In a statement, Katherine Fernandez Rundle, the state attorney for Miami-Dade County, said her office would conduct its own investigation after the state probe is completed and would “review all of the evidence to determine whether the actions of the shooting officer constitute a criminal act.”
Eugene and the North Miami police did not release the name of the officer involved, referring questions instead to the state agency, which said it would not name the officer.
The police department has released relatively few details about the shooting, which drew widespread attention days after it occurred when video of the episode began to spread online.
During his briefing Thursday, Eugene said police received a 911 call Monday just after 5 p.m. about “a male with a gun threatening to commit suicide.” There were witnesses that also reported a gun, Eugene said.
“Our officers responded to the scene with that threat in mind,” Eugene said. But he said there were no guns at the scene. “I want to make it clear: There was no gun recovered.”
In a statement Tuesday, the police department had offered slightly more about what unfolded: “Arriving officers attempted to negotiate with two men on the scene, one of whom was later identified as suffering from Autism,” the statement said. “At some point during the on-scene negotiation, one of the responding officers discharged his weapon, striking the employee of the [assisted living facility].”
Police have not responded to multiple requests for comment. According to their statement, the officer involved has been placed on administrative leave, as is standard policy in police-involved shootings.
Authorities have not said why the officer opened fire on an unarmed man with his hands prominently in the air and with another man nearby.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch said the Justice Department was aware of the North Miami shooting, but she said federal officials do not know enough yet to know if they will review it.
“I’m aware of the incident, and we’re working with our partners in the area to gather more information about it,” Lynch said during a news conference Thursday. “We’re trying to gather all the facts about it so we can determine, essentially, how that matter will be handled or reviewed.”
This latest shooting comes at a tense time for police and civilians, after a remarkably fraught period that saw high-profile shootings of and by police officers.
Police across the country are on alert after gunmen ambushed officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge just days apart, killing eight officers. At the same time, police are under scrutiny after the fatal shootings of two black men earlier this month. Bystanders filmed Baton Rouge police fatally shoot Alton Sterling in the early hours of July 5. Less than 48 hours later, Philando Castile was fatally shot by an officer in Falcon Heights, Minn. His girlfriend streamed the aftermath on Facebook Live.
Like those two incidents, the Monday afternoon altercation was partially captured on camera.
[Live video is now crucial in holding police accountable for their actions. Is Facebook ready?]
“He was lying on the ground, with his hands up, freezing, being rational, and he was still shot,” Rep. Frederica S. Wilson (D-Fla.), who represents part of Miami-Dade County, said at the news conference Thursday.
“This is not supposed to be happening in North Miami,” she said. “North Miami is a city where the police officers and the community gel. So many of our police officers come from the community, live in the community, work with the community.”

Before the recording began Monday, the young autistic man had apparently wandered away from a North Miami assisted living facility. A manager at the facility told WSVN that the man was “about 23 years old, he’s autistic, he’s nonverbal [and] he’s relatively low-functioning.”
The autistic man sat on the ground, blocking traffic, while he played with a small white toy truck, Napoleon told The Post.
Kinsey, an employee at the facility, went to retrieve him.
Around the same time, someone in the area called 911 and reported seeing a man with a gun threatening to commit suicide, police said.
According to Napoleon, Kinsey was trying to persuade the autistic man to get out of the street when police approached with their rifles raised.
With the Sterling and Castile shootings on his mind, Kinsey lay down on the ground and put his hands in the air.
“I was really more worried about him than myself,” Kinsey told WSVN, referring to the autistic man.
Two bystander videos capture snippets of what happened next.
A video from before the shooting — obtained by Napoleon and shared with The Post — begins with bystanders saying “Look, look, look” in Spanish.
“Mira, mira, mira,” a man can be heard saying, training his cellphone camera on Kinsey, who is on the ground with his hands up and trying to get the autistic man to do the same.
“Lay down on your stomach,” Kinsey tells the young man.
“Shut up,” the autistic man shouts. “Shut up, you idiot.”
Kinsey turns his attention to the police.
“Can I get up now?” he asks. “Can I get up?”
As police aim their assault rifles at the men in the street, Kinsey tries to explain to them that they pose no threat.
“All he has is a toy truck in his hand. A toy truck,” Kinsey can be heard saying in the video. “I am a behavioral therapist at a group home.
“That’s all it is,” he says, referring to the toy truck. “That’s all it is. There is no need for guns.”
“Let me see your hands,” a cop can be heard shouting at the autistic man. “Get on the ground. Get on the ground.”
The autistic man then begins to make noises, apparently playing with his toy.
“Rinaldo, please be still,” Kinsey tells his patient. “Sit down, Rinaldo. Lay on your stomach.”
The video then cuts out, leaving a critical gap in the footage.
Shortly after and off camera, one of the officers fired his weapon three times.
One of the bullets struck Kinsey near his right knee, exiting his upper thigh.
“My life flashed in front of me,” he told WSVN, adding that his first thought was of his family.
His second thought was one of confusion.
“When he shot me, it was so surprising,” he said. “It was like a mosquito bite, and when it hit me, I’m like, I still got my hands in the air, and I said, ‘No, I just got shot.'”
“Sir, why did you shoot me?” Kinsey recalled asking the officer.
“He said, ‘I don’t know.'”
A second video captures the moments after the shooting, as officers placed the injured Kinsey and the autistic man into handcuffs.
“He was like, ‘Please don’t shoot me,'” a bystander can be heard saying on the video. “Why they shot the black boy and not the fat boy?”
“Because the things with the blacks,” another man says.
“I don’t know who’s guilty,” adds what sounds like a woman’s voice.
It was the officers’ reaction after the shooting that upset Kinsey and Napoleon the most.
“They flipped me over, and I’m face-down in the ground, with cuffs on, waiting on the rescue squad to come,” Kinsey told WSVN. “I’d say about 20, about 20 minutes it took the rescue squad to get there. And I was like, bleeding — I mean bleeding, and I was like, ‘Wow.'”
“Right now, I am just grateful that he is alive and he is able to tell his story,” his wife, Joyce, told the TV station.
Kinsey was “dumbfounded” by the shooting, Napoleon said.
“He should recover physically, but he is really kind of mentally distraught,” the attorney added. “As you can see in the video, he did everything he thought he had to do and then some … and still got shot.”
Napoleon said his client was on the ground with his hands up, as in the video, when shot.
“Nobody got up or approached” the officers, the attorney said, adding that the fact that the officer fired three times shows it was “not an accident.”
“The straw that really breaks the camel’s back, that makes it even more frustrating, is that after my client was shot, they handcuffed him and left him on the hot Miami summer pavement for 20 minutes while fire-rescue came and while he was bleeding out,” Napoleon said. “But for the grace of God he wouldn’t be with us.”
On July 5, two white Baton Rouge police officers fatally shot 37-year-old black man Alton Sterling. Here's what you need to know. (Monica Akhtar/The Washington Post)

“That toy truck does not come close to looking like a gun,” he told The Post. “The officers had more than enough time to look and make a determination and not just base it on what they heard on the telephone. They have an obligation to go and look and determine if [reports of an armed man were] right, and they had ample opportunity to do so.”
Napoleon said he knew better than most the dangers cops endure on a daily basis.
“You’re talking to someone whose dad was a police officer in the city of Detroit in the ’70s and ’80s,” he said. “I understand it. I had a fear when I was a child of whether or not my father was going to come home.
“But at the end of the day, we can’t use that as an excuse to allow police officers to shoot unarmed individuals,” he said. “Just like the police ask the community to not judge them based on … however many bad apples that are out there. In the same sense, they have to be able to hold themselves to the same standard and not hold the entire [black] community responsible for the incidents that happened in Dallas and Baton Rouge.”
Napoleon said he was already in negotiations with the city of North Miami regarding a possible settlement.
“I have confidence that the city is going to negotiate in good faith and try to resolve this issue,” he said. “At a minimum, we would request that they terminate the officer immediately based on what’s in the video.”
The attorney said he trusted the state’s attorney’s office to determine whether criminal charges should be filed against the officer.
Napoleon said Kinsey, a father of five, is involved in community efforts to keep youths out of trouble and in school.
“He’s just a solid guy,” he said of his client, who remains hospitalized. “It takes a special individual to work with people with special needs, as this young man did. That shows his character.”
This story, first published at 4:21 a.m., has been updated.

Malaysia: US says $1bn siphoned from 1MDB fund to finance gambling debts, private jet

Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak. Pic: AP.
Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak. Pic: AP.

 
THE plot behind the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) state fund scandal has thickened with the intervention of the United States government.

Gambling debts in Las Vegas, a private jet, and funding for Oscar-nominated movie ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ are among the opulent expenses allegedly bankrolled by the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund in a scandal involving billions of dollars of taxpayers’ money.

Amid colossal allegations of transborder graft and money laundering, the U.S. Department of Justice is looking to seize more than $1 billion in assets that federal officials say were misappropriated from the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) wealth fund.


Apart from film rights to ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’, artwork from Claude Monet and Vincent Van Gogh; a US$250 million investment in Parklane Hotel, New York; a US$176 million EMI Music investment; and $100 million worth of real estate in the U.S. and U.K. are said to be among the assets involved.
1MDB is wholly owned by the Malaysian Finance Ministry. Malaysian Prime Minister and Finance Minister Najib Razak oversees the state fund.

According to the complaints, from 2009 through 2015, more than $3.5 billion in funds belonging to 1MDB was allegedly misappropriated by high-level officials of 1MDB and their associates, the department said.


It said the $1 billion was laundered through the United States and “traceable to the conspiracy”.

The department pointed out that 1MDB was created by the government of Malaysia to promote economic development in Malaysia through global partnerships and foreign direct investment, and its funds were intended to be used for improving the well-being of the Malaysian people.

However, 1MDB officials, including top-level Malaysian officials, and their associates allegedly misappropriated more than $3.5 billion.

After the department filed civil complaints on Wednesday, Attorney General Loretta Lynch told a news conference that the complaints represented the largest single action ever brought under the Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative.

“The Department of Justice will not allow the American financial system to be used as a conduit for corruption,” Lynch said in a statement.

Construction workers chat in front of a billboard for state investment fund 1 Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) at the fund's flagship Tun Razak Exchange development in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Pic: AP
Construction workers chat in front of a billboard for state investment fund 1 Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) at the fund’s flagship Tun Razak Exchange development in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Pic: AP

“We are seeking to forfeit and recover funds that were intended to grow the Malaysian economy and support the Malaysian people.

“Instead, they were stolen, laundered through American financial institutions and used to enrich a few officials and their associates.”

She added that a number of corrupt officials had treated 1MDB as their private bank account.
FBI Deputy Director Andrew G. McCabe, echoing Lynch’s statement, said: “The Malaysian people were defrauded on an enormous scale.”

Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak’s step son, Riza Aziz, is among those implicated in the scandal. According to Variety, Riza was a financier and producer of ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’, which was produced by Red Granite Pictures.


Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell, who was present at the announcement, said it was a case where life imitated art, alluding to the theme of the movie.

“The associates of these corrupt 1MDB officials are alleged to have used some of the illicit proceeds of their fraud scheme to fund the production of ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’, a movie about a corrupt stockbroker who tried to hide his own illicit profits in a perceived foreign safe haven,” she said.

“But whether corrupt officials try to hide stolen assets across international borders – or behind the silver screen – the Department of Justice is committed to ensuring that there is no safe haven.”

MalaysiaKini, citing the lawsuit by the department, reported that US$731 million was allegedly siphoned from 1MDB into a bank account owned by the unnamed ‘Malaysian Official 1’.

Although ‘Malaysian Official 1’ was not named, the individual was described as a “high-ranking official in the Malaysian government who also held a position of authority with 1MDB,” and a relative of Riza.
Additional reporting by Associated Press

May gets Hollande ultimatum: free trade depends on free movement

Migrants stand next to a flag of England inside a camp for migrants and refugees in Calais. May and Hollande are in agreement that the border between France and the UK will remain in Calais. Photograph: Philippe Huguen/AFP/Getty Images
 Marine Le Pen held a news conference at the FN party headquarters in France, after Britain voted to leave the EU. Photograph: Jacky Naegelen/Reuters

  • French leader takes hard line in meeting with British prime minister
  • Leave camp may struggle to deliver on referendum promises
  • Calais checks under Le Touquet agreement will stay in place, says president
François Hollande: ‘I understand the UK needs to delay triggering article 50’

 in Paris-Thursday 21 July 2016

Theresa May was warned by French president François Hollande at their first meeting in Paris that the UK cannot expect access to the single market if it wants to put immigration controls on EU citizens.

At a joint press conference in the Élysée Palace, the French president made it clear that May was facing a choice about whether to accept free movement of people in return for free trade.

Standing alongside the new prime minister, speaking in French with an official translator, he said: “It’s the most crucial point. That’s the point that will be the subject of the negotiation.

“The UK today has access to the single market because it respects the four freedoms. If it wishes to remain within the single market it is its decision to know how far and how it will have to abide by the four freedoms.

“None can be separated from the other. There cannot be freedom of movement of goods, free movement of capital, free movement of services if there isn’t a free movement of people … It will be a choice facing the UK – remain in the single market and then assume the free movement that goes with it or to have another status.”

Hollande’s comments suggest it will be difficult for the UK to fulfil the desire ofBoris Johnson, the foreign secretary, and other prominent Vote Leave figures during the referendum campaign, who favoured access to the single market while imposing limits on immigration.

However, Hollande offered more support over May’s decision to wait until next year before triggering article 50 of the Lisbon treaty, which formally kicks off the two-year process of the UK leaving the EU.
Earlier in Dublin, Hollande had demanded an explanation for the delay, saying: “We understood it would be September, then October and then December. Justifications will have to be given.”

However, he appeared to soften his language after the bilateral talks with May, saying he “understood the government that has just been formed needs this time”.

He added: “But let me repeat, the sooner the better in the common interests ofEurope … because uncertainty is the greatest danger. When economic players doubt the conditions under which the UK will leave and the relationship that will be maintained, there can be risks for stability of the European economy and therefore for jobs.”

The two leaders found most consensus on the issue of maintaining the existing Le Touquet agreement that means UK border checks are conducted in Calais in an attempt to control the flow of refugees and migrants across the channel.

During the EU referendum campaign, May, David Cameron and a French government minister all suggested this could be in jeopardy and the border could move to the UK if there was a vote for Brexit; the claims were dismissed as “project fear” by leave campaigners.

On Thursday, May and Hollande said they were completely committed to maintaining the Calais border.
May said: “We have discussed the Le Touquet agreement, and president Hollande and indeed interior minister [Bernard] Cazeneuve have both been very clear from their point of view that they wish the Le Touquet agreement to stay. I want the Le Touquet agreement to stay.

“I know there are those who are calling for it to go. There are those within France who are calling for it to go … Le Touquet is of benefit I believe to both the UK andFrance and we are both very clear Britain now having taken the decision to leave the EU, Le Touquet agreement should stay.”

Hollande became the first EU leader to guarantee that British people living in France would be allowed to stay in his country once the UK’s exit negotiations concluded.

“There is no doubt that the France people who reside in the UK will be able to continue to work there and that the British people in France will be able to continue to work there and spend as much time as they wish,” the French president said.

May has held off making a promise guaranteeing the right to reside in the UK of all EU citizens until she gets pledges from other nations that the rights of Britons will be preserved.

“I expect to be able to do so, and the only situation in which that wouldn’t be possible is if British citizens’ rights in European member states were not being protected,” she said.

May arrived in Paris after visit to Berlin for similar talks with Angela Merkel. The German chancellor struck a sympathetic note about it being right and necessary for Britain to take its time with preparations for triggering article 50. Unlike Hollande, she did not rule out a deal that combines some level of access to the single market with controls on immigration.

In the coming months, May is expected to make her way round more EU leaders as she lays the foundations for negotiations on Brexit, even though Brussels has banned formal and informal talks until article 50 is activated.

Cameron used his final meeting with EU leaders in Brussels earlier this month to warn that the British public would be unwilling to accept any deal that did not include limits on the free movement of people.
But there are concerns among other member states that ceding ground to Britain on the issue of immigration controls - which became a central theme of the referendum campaign - would strengthen the hand of anti-immigrant parties in other countries. Marine Le Pen, the leader of France’s far right Front National, was jubilant after the Brexit vote, calling it the most important moment since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

May has handed the tough task of negotiating the details of the EU departure to David Davis, who will run Whitehall’s new Brexit ministry, while two more Brexiters, Liam Fox and Johnson, have been put in charge of trade and foreign affairs, both key departments as the practical challenges of negotiating an exit emerge.

Brexit campaigners appeared to suggest during the hard-fought referendum campaign that Britain would be able to maintain tariff-free access to EU markets while also “taking back control” of migration flows, but refused to identify what specific type of relationship they had in mind.
Cameron fought hard for the right to control migration during his renegotiation of Britain’s relationship with the rest of the EU last year and won some changes, including the right to gradually phase in benefits for new arrivals from other member-states. But that deal lapsed when the public voted to leave and the rest of the EU is now keen to hear what Britain’s demands will be for the article 50 process, which could take up to two years, and which all countries must be willing to sign up to.

May was given a military welcome in Paris for the talks, which lasted around an hour. After the press conference, May and Hollande attended a working dinner where the leaders were served lobster salad, veal with spinach, vanilla mousse with strawberries and cheese.

The World’s Largest Refugee Camp Is Invited to Please Shut Down

A woman walks along the edge of the Dagahaley refugee camp, which makes up part of the giant Dadaab refugee settlement, on July 23, 2011 in Dadaab, Kenya. (OLI SCARFF | GETTY IMAGES)--A woman stands next to her home in Dadaab in July 2011, when thousands of new refugees arrived because of the famine in neighboring Somalia. (Photo by OLI SCARFF / GETTY IMAGES)
Aden Noor Ibrahim arrived in Dadaab during the 2011 famine in Somalia. (Photo by TY MCCORMICK / FOREIGN POLICY)--Nafisa Mohamed Noor holds an x-ray against the sky, revealing shrapnel from a mortar shell that is still embedded in her hip. (Photo by TY MCCORMICK / FOREIGN POLICY

JULY 21, 2016

DADAAB REFUGEE CAMP, Kenya — Nafiso Mohamed Noor says she never wants to go back to Somalia. But if the Kenyan government follows through with its plan to close the world’s largest refugee camp by the end of the year, she may not have a choice.

Noor knows what it means to return prematurely to a war zone. In May 2015, after Kenya renewed what has become a perennial threat to shutter the sprawling, windswept settlement on its northeastern frontier that houses more than 326,000 refugees, most of them from neighboring Somalia, she decided to sign up for the U.N.’s voluntary repatriation program. Better to go back on her own terms than risk being rounded up and deported without warning, she thought.

So in August, after waiting three months for the U.N. refugee agency (UNHCR) to process her application, she boarded a flight to the Somali capital of Mogadishu. She found her old house in Wardigle, a neighborhood whose name in Somali roughly translates to “stream” — or “channel” — “of blood,” still standing. But less than two months later, a mortar fired by al-Shabab militants crashed into her kitchen. The round sheared off her right breast, sliced a 3-inch gash in her left foot, and left shards of metal embedded deep in her left hip.

“The shrapnel is still there,” she said recently, tracing a faint crescent shape near the ball of her femur on an X-ray taken here in Dadaab. “There, it looks like a moon.”

Noor returned to Dadaab as soon as she recovered from her injuries, but she once again faces the prospect of repatriation to Somalia before the war there is over. In May, the Kenyan government said it planned to close Dadaab for good, along with another refugee camp along its northwestern border that houses nearly 200,000 mainly South Sudanese refugees, citing security concerns. Since it invaded Somalia in 2011 to create a buffer zone against the growing al-Shabab threat, Kenya has seen a dramatic surge in domestic terrorist attacks. The government claims that some of the worst attacks, including those at the Westgate Mall in Nairobi in 2013 and at Garissa University College last year, were planned in Dadaab, although it has never produced any evidence to support this.

But unlike previous threats to shutter the camp, the government followed this one up with action. It disbanded its Department of Refugee Affairs in May and later announced a plan to move 150,000 people out of Dadaab by the end of the year through a combination of voluntary repatriation, relocating non-Somali refugees, and removing Kenyans who falsely registered as refugees from the UNHCR’s rolls. The government has not addressed the discrepancy in numbers — nearly 200,000 people would remain in Dadaab even if the government succeeds in relocating 150,000 — or explained how the camp would be closed if some or most of its inhabitants decide they wish to remain behind.

If Dadaab were actually to be emptied by the end of 2016, the exodus would rival the massive forced relocation of Rwandan refugees registered in Zaire, now Democratic Republic of the Congo, after that country was invaded by Rwanda in 1996. And according to experts, it would almost certainly violate international law, which prohibits the forceful repatriation of refugees. Even the voluntary repatriation process currently underway could fall into a legal gray area, some experts argue, since many refugees fear they will be forcefully uprooted or are struggling to survive on limited food rations in the camp.
“Our objective is to close the camp,” said Haro Kamau, the deputy commissioner of Garissa County, who oversees Dadaab. “You cannot be a refugee forever. I think the situation in Somalia today allows for people to go home.”

Opened in 1992, one year after the collapse of Siad Barre’s dictatorship plunged Somalia into civil war, Dadaab has long since evolved into a massive informal city. Thousands of makeshift dwellings, jury-rigged with scraps of plastic and ringed by identical thornbrush hedges, fan out in orderly grids. Markets, schools, and small businesses like Sahruja Hair Salon and the Kempinski Hotel — a single-story affair with a listing metal roof — comprise the camp’s only permanent structures aside from the aid agencies, which hunker down behind blast-proof Hesco barriers. Kenya does not wish to assimilate hundreds of thousands of Somalis, so it keeps the refugees in a permanent state of limbo, unable to leave or work legally in the camp, and unable to safely return to their home country. Three generations of Somalis have now grown up in Dadaab, and the majority of the younger inhabitants have never seen their home country.

Now they are beginning to trickle back. Flights carrying refugees to Mogadishu leave from Dadaab several times per week, as do buses bound for the southern Somali port city of Kismayo. More than 10,000 people have returned home so far this year, according to UNHCR, which administers the voluntary repatriation program and is currently working with the Kenyan government to weed out Kenyans who claimed refugee status in order to gain access to humanitarian aid. The U.N. initially pushed for Kenya to reconsider its plan to close the camp, citing humanitarian concerns, but it has since bowed to pressure by the Kenyan government and agreed to help halve the population of the camp by the end of the year.
“This is for real,” Kamau said of the government’s plan to shutter Dadaab. He said the terrorist threat was the “overriding” reason for the closure but added that arms smuggling, human trafficking, and environmental degradation from the massive refugee population also factored into the decision.

But it remains unclear what will happen once the government runs out of volunteers for repatriation. Noor, for one, says she has no interest in returning to Somalia, despite her nostalgia for the peaceful Mogadishu where she grew up. Born in 1975 in a white stone house a few blocks from Villa Somalia, the presidential palace, she is old enough to remember the days when Mogadishu was known as the “white pearl of the Indian Ocean.”

“I still have fond memories of those years,” she said. “But I could not stand to live in a place where the suicide bomber bumps into you in the street, where a truckload of explosives can ram into your house, where a stray mortar can hit you in the street.”

Noor initially fled Somalia in 2011, when the fighting between al-Shabab militants and African Union peacekeepers was at its fiercest and hundreds of people were starving to death each day because the Islamist militants wouldn’t allow emergency food aid into famine-affected areas. She arrived in Dadaab with nine children, her disabled husband, and the equivalent of about U.S. $20. It was all that remained of her middle-class life in Mogadishu.

Life in the camp was harsh. The winter winds stirred up vast curtains of dust and sand that poured through every chink in their flimsy tarpaulin dwelling. The food rations provided by the U.N. agencies were never enough. “But at least there was peace,” she said.

There was also education for her children, all but the youngest of whom enrolled in one of the camp’s 52 schools. Tens of thousands of refugees have been educated on the U.N.’s dime over the years, but the Kenyan government’s tight restrictions on employment mean that few opportunities await graduates.
“We are wondering about why a government should waste people’s talents and not allow them to work or to integrate after all these years,” said Aden Noor Ibrahim, who like Noor arrived with his family during the famine of 2011.

Mostly bald with a flaming red beard the color of henna, Ibrahim kept goats and other livestock before al-Shabab captured his region in southern Somalia and forced him to flee. He said that life in Dadaab was bearable at first, but that cuts to food rations provided by U.N. agencies meant that he and his children, aged 4 to 19, now often go hungry. (In June 2015, the World Food Programme (WFP), the U.N.’s food relief agency, cut food rations by 30 percent because of funding shortfalls.)

Unable to work in the camp, Ibrahim decided last year to risk returning to Somalia in order to provide for his family. He took a job as a porter in Kismayo, which, having been “liberated” from al-Shabab in 2012, is now ruled by the notorious militia leader and former al-Shabab member Ahmed Madobe. He braved near-daily threats from clan militias that operate there with impunity but was finally forced to return to Dadaab because of illness. The main hospital in Kismayo lacked even basic medical supplies, he said, and he was unable to afford private medical care for a painful chest infection. He says he won’t return to his home country until the war there is over and an effective government is in place.

“We have nowhere to go and nowhere to stay. The situation in Somalia is in fact worse than what we already fled from,” he said. “They say this repatriation is voluntary, but 150,000? How will that be voluntary?”

Lack of healthcare is a major concern for many refugees contemplating the possibility of return. After more than a quarter-century of grinding civil war, most health care in the country is provided by the U.N., by foreign medical charities or by private operators. Outside of a few major urban areas like Mogadishu and Kismayo, it can be virtually impossible to see a doctor. Only 44 percent of births are attended by a trained midwife, and one in 12 women dies from pregnancy-related complications, according to the United Nations. The mortality rate for children under the age of 5 is among the highest in the world.
“There is totally no medical care in Somalia,” said Abdewali Hire Hassan, who works for the Kenya Red Cross in Dadaab. “The medical facilities that exist are private and they want to milk people for money, so only the rich can get care. For refugees, there will be nothing. It will be like throwing people away in a ditch.”
For those refugees who see education — for themselves or for their children — as the only hope of escaping poverty, the situation in Somalia looks similarly bleak. Dadaab may be an open prison with few employment opportunities for even its brightest students, but at least it adheres to Kenya’s national curriculum, and a handful of lucky graduates receive scholarships each year to study in Kenyan universities or in the West. By contrast, Somalia has no public education system to speak of, and only 10 percent of primary school-aged children were in school as of 2010, according to a report by the Global Campaign for Education, which ranked the country’s education system the weakest in the world.

Word of Dadaab’s impending closure has sent shockwaves through the camp’s network of primary and secondary schools. At Hagadera Secondary School, a shabby warren of concrete classrooms topped with metal roofs, teachers say they’ve seen a dramatic drop in class attendance since the announcement in May.
“Less than 30 percent of students are coming to school now, down from 60 to 80 percent,” said Hussein Ismail, Hagadera’s principal. “They will say, ‘You know, I will be repatriated whether I want to be or not. Why am I doing homework?’”

One of those still showing up is Sadia Abdi Mohamed, a talkative 22-year-old with heavy eyelids and a broad smile who is hoping to win an Albert Einstein German Academic Refugee Initiative (DAFI) scholarship, funded by the German government and administered by UNHCR, to study at a university in Kenya.

“I have known since I was 5 that I want to be a doctor, a gynecologist, and to assist other women,” she said. “I am not happy about going back to Somalia. I want to stay here [in Kenya] and finish my education.”
In 2008, militiamen from a rival clan killed Mohamed’s father, burned down her family’s home in Mogadishu, and tortured her mother and sisters. “I left my motherland Somalia because of insecurity, torture, persecution and injustice to human rights,” she wrote in her application for the DAFI scholarship. “I am planning to fight the dropout of girls from schools and I shall encourage them that education is important and that it is the key of the world.”

If Dadaab is shuttered and its schools boarded up, Mohamed and thousands like her may never see the inside of a classroom again. Even carrying the educational certificates they earned here back to Somalia could put them in danger, since al-Shabab has been known to target those educated in Kenya in order to deter others from fleeing to the camps.

Some worry that sending thousands of young men back to a place where there are few educational or professional opportunities will only widen the pool of potential extremist recruits. “They may join those militia groups, so it may even worsen the small peace we have there,” said Ismail.

Although it is assisting with the voluntary deportations, the U.N. has stopped short of endorsing a full closure of the camp. Experts say that goal would be nearly impossible to achieve without forcefully repatriating refugees, a violation of international law.

“[C]amp closures are likely to lead to mass deportation back to refugees’ countries of origin, triggering a serious violation of international and Kenyan law prohibiting forced return to persecution or other serious harm,” Leslie Lefkow, the deputy director of Human Rights Watch’s Africa division, wrote in May.
Asked what will happen if the Kenyan government cannot meet its goal of reducing the camp’s population by 150,000 through strictly voluntary measures, Ahmed Baba Fall, UNHCR’s head of operations in Dadaab, said, “I think you better ask that question to the government, not to me. They are the ones who said they will close the camp by November and they are the ones who said that repatriation will be voluntary and humane… I am still asking myself what you are asking me: What do we do with those who are not going?”

Kamau, the deputy commissioner of Garissa County, said he did not anticipate that anyone would refuse repatriation. “It would be very unkind for any refugee to refuse to go home,” he said.

Since many refugees fear they will be forced out if they do not agree to leave, and since conditions in the camp have grown more desperate as WFP has cut ration levels for residents, some human rights advocates believe that even the early repatriation process now underway is not strictly voluntary.

“You can’t talk about voluntary repatriation until everybody feels safe and that staying is a choice,” said Ben Rawlence, the author of City of Thorns, a new book about Dadaab. “What’s happening at the moment is illegal and forced and wrong.”

On a recent morning at the parched airstrip in Dadaab, a group of several hundred refugees waited to board brightly painted buses bound for Kismayo. Each of them received an aid package to help them transition to their new lives outside the camp: a blanket, a mat to sleep on, and $200.

Dressed in a faded brown shawl and plastic flip-flops, Hamara Sankus pressed her left thumb into a blue inkpad. With three quick impressions on a form provided by the UNHCR, she had given up her status as a refugee, making her ineligible for future assistance should she ever return to Dadaab. Moments later, her two children had done the same.

Sankus said the decision to return to Somalia had been hers alone, but she wasn’t sure what to expect when she arrived there. She and her children, 18-year-old Mohamed and 13-year-old Salado, would find out soon enough.

“What does the future hold?” she asked before climbing aboard a pink bus with yellow stripes. “Whatever God plans for me.”

Top image by OLI SCARFF / GETTY IMAGES