Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, July 7, 2016

What to the American Slave is Your 4th of July

Frederick-Douglass-sepia_art
by Frederick Douglass

Excerpt of speech by Frederick Douglass, July 5, 1852, Rochester, New York

( July 5, 2016, Boston, Sri Lanka Guardian) What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July? I answer: a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciations of tyrants, brass fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade, and solemnity, are, to him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy — a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices, more shocking and bloody, than are the people of these United States, at this very hour.

Go where you may, search where you will, roam through all the monarchies and despotisms of the old world, travel through South America, search out every abuse, and when you have found the last, lay your facts by the side of the everyday practices of this nation, and you will say with me, that, for revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy, America reigns without a rival.

Take the American slave-trade, which, we are told by the papers, is especially prosperous just now. Ex-Senator Benton tells us that the price of men was never higher than now. He mentions the fact to show that slavery is in no danger. This trade is one of the peculiarities of American institutions. It is carried on in all the large towns and cities in one-half of this confederacy; and millions are pocketed every year, by dealers in this horrid traffic. In several states, this trade is a chief source of wealth. It is called (in contradistinction to the foreign slave-trade) “the internal slave trade.” It is, probably, called so, too, in order to divert from it the horror with which the foreign slave-trade is contemplated. That trade has long since been denounced by this government, as piracy. It has been denounced with burning words, from the high places of the nation, as an execrable traffic. To arrest it, to put an end to it, this nation keeps a squadron, at immense cost, on the coast of Africa. Everywhere, in this country, it is safe to speak of this foreign slave-trade, as a most inhuman traffic, opposed alike to the laws of God and of man. The duty to extirpate and destroy it, is admitted even by our DOCTORS OF DIVINITY. In order to put an end to it, some of these last have consented that their colored brethren (nominally free) should leave this country, and establish themselves on the western coast of Africa! It is, however, a notable fact that, while so much execration is poured out by Americans upon those engaged in the foreign slave-trade, the men engaged in the slave-trade between the states pass without condemnation, and their business is deemed honorable.

Behold the practical operation of this internal slave-trade, the American slave-trade, sustained by American politics and America religion. Here you will see men and women reared like swine for the market. You know what is a swine-drover? I will show you a man-drover. They inhabit all our Southern States. They perambulate the country, and crowd the highways of the nation, with droves of human stock. You will see one of these human flesh-jobbers, armed with pistol, whip and bowie-knife, driving a company of a hundred men, women, and children, from the Potomac to the slave market at New Orleans. These wretched people are to be sold singly, or in lots, to suit purchasers. They are food for the cotton-field, and the deadly sugar-mill. Mark the sad procession, as it moves wearily along, and the inhuman wretch who drives them. Hear his savage yells and his blood-chilling oaths, as he hurries on his affrighted captives! There, see the old man, with locks thinned and gray. Cast one glance, if you please, upon that young mother, whose shoulders are bare to the scorching sun, her briny tears falling on the brow of the babe in her arms. See, too, that girl of thirteen, weeping, yes! weeping, as she thinks of the mother from whom she has been torn! The drove moves tardily. Heat and sorrow have nearly consumed their strength; suddenly you hear a quick snap, like the discharge of a rifle; the fetters clank, and the chain rattles simultaneously; your ears are saluted with a scream, that seems to have torn its way to the center of your soul! The crack you heard, was the sound of the slave-whip; the scream you heard, was from the woman you saw with the babe. Her speed had faltered under the weight of her child and her chains! that gash on her shoulder tells her to move on. Follow the drove to New Orleans. Attend the auction; see men examined like horses; see the forms of women rudely and brutally exposed to the shocking gaze of American slave-buyers. See this drove sold and separated forever; and never forget the deep, sad sobs that arose from that scattered multitude. Tell me citizens, WHERE, under the sun, you can witness a spectacle more fiendish and shocking. Yet this is but a glance at the American slave-trade, as it exists, at this moment, in the ruling part of the United States.

I was born amid such sights and scenes. To me the American slave-trade is a terrible reality. When a child, my soul was often pierced with a sense of its horrors. I lived on Philpot Street, Fell’s Point, Baltimore, and have watched from the wharves, the slave ships in the Basin, anchored from the shore, with their cargoes of human flesh, waiting for favorable winds to waft them down the Chesapeake. There was, at that time, a grand slave mart kept at the head of Pratt Street, by Austin Woldfolk. His agents were sent into every town and county in Maryland, announcing their arrival, through the papers, and on flaming “hand-bills,” headed CASH FOR NEGROES. These men were generally well dressed men, and very captivating in their manners. Ever ready to drink, to treat, and to gamble. The fate of many a slave has depended upon the turn of a single card; and many a child has been snatched from the arms of its mother by bargains arranged in a state of brutal drunkenness.

The flesh-mongers gather up their victims by dozens, and drive them, chained, to the general depot at Baltimore. When a sufficient number have been collected here, a ship is chartered, for the purpose of conveying the forlorn crew to Mobile, or to New Orleans. From the slave prison to the ship, they are usually driven in the darkness of night; for since the antislavery agitation, a certain caution is observed.

In the deep still darkness of midnight, I have been often aroused by the dead heavy footsteps, and the piteous cries of the chained gangs that passed our door. The anguish of my boyish heart was intense; and I was often consoled, when speaking to my mistress in the morning, to hear her say that the custom was very wicked; that she hated to hear the rattle of the chains, and the heart-rending cries. I was glad to find one who sympathized with me in my horror.

Fellow-citizens, this murderous traffic is, to-day, in active operation in this boasted republic. In the solitude of my spirit, I see clouds of dust raised on the highways of the South; I see the bleeding footsteps; I hear the doleful wail of fettered humanity, on the way to the slave-markets, where the victims are to be sold like horses, sheep, and swine, knocked off to the highest bidder. There I see the tenderest ties ruthlessly broken, to gratify the lust, caprice and rapacity of the buyers and sellers of men. My soul sickens at the sight . . .

But a still more inhuman, disgraceful, and scandalous state of things remains to be presented. By an act of the American Congress, not yet two years old, slavery has been nationalized in its most horrible and revolting form. By that act, Mason and Dixon’s line has been obliterated; New York has become as Virginia; and the power to hold, hunt, and sell men, women, and children as slaves remains no longer a mere state institution, but is now an institution of the whole United States. The power is co-extensive with the Star-Spangled Banner and American Christianity.

FDA Approves a Dangerous Opioid Based on Cheap Party Study!

The US is #1 in the world in opioid use. Disturbing and true!

http://www.salem-news.com/graphics/snheader.jpg
Because prescription opioids are similar to, and act on the same brain systems affected by, heroin and morphine, they present an intrinsic abuse and addiction liability, particularly if they are used for non-medical purposes. Image: drugabuse.gov

opioid brainJul-07-2016

(MYRTLE BEACH, S.C.) - The FDA advisory committee strikes again and recommended approval of Vantrela ER (Teva Pharmaceuticals), a new hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablet with abuse-deterrent capabilities.

As the U.S. is fighting a devastating epidemic of prescription opioid/heroin addictions and deaths, the FDA approves yet another opioid. Maybe someone should ask the FDA "how many opioids does it take to devastate every state in the country?"

The US is #1 in the world in opioid use followed closely by Canada.

The FDA's reasoning in addressing the prescription opioid epidemic and approving yet another extended release opioid is because it has "abuse-deterrent capabilities".

Teva officials described the finished product as a “gooey mess” when people try to alter it in any way. The FDA advised that Teva used a new and unique technique in the design of Vantrela ER. Oh yes it is unique, quite unique and quite disturbing.
Ready for disturbing?

Teva conducted studies under the guidance of the FDA indicating how its technology would reduce abuse of their opioid.

The studies were conducted in healthy college-age students who admitted to using recreational drugs, according to Lynn R. Webster, MD, the vice president of scientific affairs at PRA Health Sciences in Salt Lake City.

Dr. Webster said the participants liked the effects of opioids, but were not dependent. In addition, they were given naloxone so that they had an intolerance to opioids. A urine test was conducted during every encounter to ensure that they did not use other drugs during the study according to Dr. Webster.

The drug was altered in various ways, and the participants were asked whether they liked the drug and would use it again. Most said they would not.

I have written several articles over the years about Lynn R. Webster, MD dubbed "Dr. Death" by CNN News in coverage of him. This is a link to my article regarding Dr. Webster and his "studies": The Smoking Gun Series.

At the time, I had no idea that Webster and his disturbing studies would serve to influence the FDA in their approval of Teva's opioid, Vantrela ER.

Webster’s pain clinic in Salt Lake City, Utah was raided by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) in 2010 for up to 100 deaths in his clinic. An investigation into Webster’s prescribing practices was launched. There were malpractice lawsuits filed against him and settled.

The Utah U.S. Attorney failed to charge Webster for the deaths in his pain clinic which the doctor attributed in many cases to suicide. Webster’s pain clinic closed and his ability to write opioid prescriptions was reportedly rescinded. But did that end Webster’s lucrative association with the pharmaceutical industry?

No, he reinvented himself as pharma’s golden “recreational drug use clinical trial researcher.”
Disturbing? You have no idea because the FDA formed an alliance to a "cheap party" non-scientific study jeopardizing the lives of potentially millions of people.

“We need new ways to prevent people from harming themselves essentially” Webster said as he heads a pharmaceutical paid trial on new abuse-deterrent drug formulations.

He further stated “One approach is to come up with a new kind of pain pill that’s hard to abuse, and pay individuals to use them to see if they can get high.”

At PRA Health Sciences in Salt Lake City, where Webster is VP of Scientific Affairs, this unique approach is underway. Hundreds of recreational drug users pass through the doors of the clinic to test out the next generation of prescription pain pills.

These studies are funded by pharmaceutical companies who are looking to make abuse-deterrent formulations. The pills are designed with tamper-proof technology. The goal is to see if real-life recreational drug users enjoy taking them as much as they do current pain pills.

The hope is that they won’t. If the pills are successful in deterring abuse, they can receive a special drug label. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has strongly encouraged pharmaceutical companies to conduct these studies. The FDA is not conducting these studies. If a new pill can show it has abuse deterrence, it can receive a special marketing label from the FDA based on pharma’s own studies.

The clinical trials do not enroll addicts, who are screened out using a “special protocol.” Thanks to the FDA and the National Institutes of Health, the identities of the recreational drug users are protected and kept confidential from law enforcement.

Most recruits are young, and male. They hear about the Human Abuse Liability studies through friends and word of mouth.

“Many of them will come in with their friends and this becomes a cheap party where they can earn some money,” said Dr. Webster.

Participants get paid between $250 and $300 a day. They cannot leave the premises until the drugs have cleared their system. Some trials last up to a month. Subjects are housed in special dormitories and are paid well. One participant likened it to being on “a paid vacation where we’re treated like kings and fed well.”

Dr. Webster is clear that these tamper-proof or abuse-deterrent drugs won’t solve America’s addiction and abuse problem. He further states that in 70% of the cases, "leftover prescription drugs" are stolen from the medicine cabinets of loved ones. Addicts will just swallow more pills and wait for them to take effect.

No, Dr. Webster, 70% of cases are not leftover prescription drugs stolen from medicine cabinets as you are paid by pharma to tell the medical profession. Most overdoses and deaths are caused by exactly why your pain clinic was raided by the DEA, and why you can no longer prescribe painkillers — the over-prescribing of dangerous opioids for chronic pain long-term resulting in deaths. The disease is “addiction” not “medicine cabinets”.

If after reading the above, you are not disturbed by the FDA and Lynn Webster's "cheap party studies" leading to approval of yet another dangerous opioid by the FDA -- you might want to sign up for future studies conducted by the infamous Dr. Webster -- and be treated like a king. Disturbing? You decide.

LP - Who first talked about the hotness of the heat in the summer? Love my infinity angel and a very special gathering.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

SRI LANKA: PARANAGAMA DEFENDS CUSTER BOMBS, MANGALA READY TO INVESTIGATE


Sri Lanka Brief06/07/2016

While chairman of the Missing Persons Commission, Maxwell Paranagama has indirectly depended the use if cluster bombs by Sri Lanka military during the war with LTTE  Foreign Minster Managala Samaraweera has castigated him saying he should not have commented in the issue at all.
Mangala accuses Paranagama of trying to be too smart

Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera today accused the chairman of the Missing Persons Commission, Maxwell Paranagama of trying to be too smart by making a public statement on the alleged use of cluster bombs during the war.

He said he was disappointed that a person in the calibre of Maxwell Paranagama made such a statement and added that such a statement will not help the reconciliation process.

Paranagama had said in a statement this week that if the army used cluster bombs before 2010 it was not illegal.
He noted that the Cluster Munitions Convention (CMC) banning the use of such weapons was not in force at the time of the conflict and only became operational on 1st August 2010.

“Therefore, if there had been a need for the Sri Lankan Army to use cluster munitions because of military necessity, it was not illegal at the time,” he had said.

Samaraweera however said Paranagama’s comment was “panditha katha” (trying to be too smart) and insisted he should not have commented at all on the subject.

The Foreign Minister said the Government is prepared to investigate if cluster bombs were used and without investigating nothing can be said. (Colombo Gazette)
————–
Use of cluster ammo not banned during war – Former Judge Maxwell Paranagama: ‘No basis for fresh inquiry’; US recommended CBUs to SLAF’

The presidential commission to investigate complaints regarding missing persons and other alleged wartime atrocities has strongly challenged Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights call for a fresh inquiry in respect of the use of cluster ammunition during eelam war IV.

Chairman of the Commission retired High Court judge Maxwell Paranagama stresses that there is no basis for UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein call for inquiry.

Paranagama was responding to UNHRC declaration: “In light of recent reports on new evidence that has emerged on the use of cluster munitions towards the end of the conflict, following similar allegations in the OHCHR investigation report, the High Commissioner calls for an independent and impartial investigation to be carried out.”

Responding to a query by The Island, Paranagama said that the commission in its second mandate report had dealt with the alleged use of cluster ammunition. Having examined all available evidence, it had concluded that such ammunition hadn’t been used by the military during the offensive, Paranagama said.

The military brought the entire Vanni region under its control during the third week of May, 2009.
Asked whether he had been informed of Sri Lanka receiving specific instructions from the US to acquire cluster ammunition for the SLAF, Paranagama stressed that as the Cluster Munitions Convention (CMC) had come into operation on August 1, 2010, the UNHRC couldn’t find fault with the then administration even if such ammunition had been used. Had a need arisen for using cluster ammunition, the Sri Lankan military could have done so without violating international laws, Paranagama said.

The US made the recommendation in the wake of the Oslo arranged Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) between the then Premier Ranil Wickremesinghe and LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran in Feb. 2002. It was among a series of recommendations made to the Sri Lanka Army, Sri Lanka Navy and Sri Lanka Air Force to strengthen their capabilities during the CFA. The US recommended that MiG 27 be armed with Cluster Bomb Units (CBUs).

Paranagama said that the UNHRC couldn’t have been unaware that the CMC came into being over one year after the conclusion of the war in Sri Lanka.

The US, Russia, Israel, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka are not among the signatories to the CMC.
An attempt was being made to tarnish Sri Lanka’s image on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations, Paranagama alleged.

Responding to another query, Paranagama said that the Second Mandate report which had dealt with the charge relating to use of cluster ammunition was tabled in Parliament last October. “Therefore, all political parties represented in Parliament should be aware of the relevant international law in respect of the use of cluster ammunition.”

Paranagama further said that UNSG Ban ki moon’s Panel of Experts (PoE) in its report released in March, 2011 had accused Sri Lanka of using CBUs without revealing any source.

Paranagama said that he would submit his final report to President Maithripala Sirisena on July 15. With the handing over of the report, investigations undertaken by his Commission would come to an end, Paranagama said. Regretting that the Second Mandate Report hadn’t been submitted to the UNHRC so far, Paranagama said that the inclusion of allegation in respect of the alleged use of cluster ammunition in the latest Geneva report had raised many questions.

According to Paranagama, various interested parties had propagated lies at the UNHRC sessions regarding the use of cluster ammunition in a bid crank up pressure on Sri Lanka. Paranagama pointed out that Sri Lanka had given unrestricted access to international mine clearing organisations to expedite the process.

By Shamindra Ferdnando.
The island

Jul 6, 2016
Paranagama Commission critique The ‘Presidential Commission to Investigate Complaints Regarding Missing Persons’, otherwise known as the ‘Paranagama Commission’ or the ‘PCICMP’, was an unusual body which has taken at least three different forms since its establishment by President Rajapaksa in August 2013. Whilst failing in each, it has succeeded in doing considerable damage to the level of trust war survivors have in Sri Lanka’s reconciliation process.  This damage must be repaired if the Office of Missing Persons that ought to replace it is to ever restore that trust.

Foreign judges in war crimes probe:
FM confident of consensus among all stakeholders

Mechanism likely to be set up by early 2017

article_image
by Shamindra Ferdinando- 

Acknowledging that there had been divergent views in respect of having foreign judges in a domestic judicial mechanism to probe alleged war crimes, Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera yesterday emphasised that a solution acceptable to the majority of stakeholders could be reached.

Minister Samaraweera said the four-party Tamil National Alliance (TNA) wanted foreign judges on the proposed judicial mechanism whereas others opposed it. But, there could be an alternative, Minister Samaraweera said, adding that consultations were taking place, both here and abroad in that regard.

Jaffna District TNA MP M.A. Sumanthiran told Congressional hearing in Washington on June 14 they expected foreign judges as agreed during talks involving the government of Sri Lanka and the US in the run-up to the Geneva sessions last October.

Addressing the media at Foreign Ministry auditorium, Minister Samaraweera said there was no need to act hastily.

The minister stressed that instructions wouldn’t be issued from top to bottom to expedite consensus on post-war reconciliation matters. Instead, there would be consultations leading to an understanding.

The Foreign Ministry called a special media briefing to explain the accountability issue being taken up at the 32 session of the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

The minister said there was the possibility of reaching agreement on the accountability mechanism by January, February, 2017.

When the media pointed out that both President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had ruled out the participation of foreign judges, Minister Samaraweera said that they could express their opinion. There could be different opinion on this matter though final decision acceptable to the majority of stakeholders would be taken after having examined all options, he noted.

Samaraweera stressed that there couldn’t be a dispute regarding international participation in the proposed mechanisms.

Asked by The Island whether the government would inquire afresh into the primary accusation that approximately 40,000 Tamil civilians perished during the Vanni offensive, Minister Samaraweera castigated the Rajapaksa administration for turning a blind eye to post-war allegations.

Recollecting the UK based Channel 4 News allegations pertaining to the massacre of 40,000 civilians, Minister Samaraweera said that an investigation could have helped Sri Lanka get at the truth. "In fact, we could have declared that such massacres didn’t take place during the Vanni offensive depending on the outcome of the inquiry", he said.

Minister Samaraweera said that he had publicly urged the then government to solicit the services of foreign forensic experts to verify Channel 4 News footage and then move the British judiciary against the media outfit. But,the government had been scared and launched a domestic process which didn’t address contentious issues, Minister Samaraweera said.

UNSG Ban Ki-moon’s Panel of Experts (PoE) accused the then government of directing indiscriminate artillery and mortar fire at civilians, government hospitals and makeshift medical facilities. The government was also accused of depriving the Vanni civilian population of food and medicine.

Minister Samaraweera emphasised that proper investigation was certainly required to clear the Sri Lankan military of alleged battlefield excesses. Denying that the government had assured the UNHRC the military would be punished, Minister Samaraweera said that the government had co-sponsored Geneva Resolution 30/1 to restore Sri Lanka’s image. Declaring that the military was disciplined, Minister Samaraweera those who had responsible for atrocities would have to be severely dealt with on the basis of the findings of investigations.

Minister Samaraweera said that the military hadn’t gone on the rampage during the Vanni offensive. He stressed the need to inquire into the culpability on the part of those who had been responsible for commanding troops. The minister said that the command and control structure of the military were far more responsible than those who had carried out directives and therefore a comprehensive investigation was called for.

Commenting on the proposed setting up of Missing Persons Office in accordance with the Geneva Resolution, Minister Samaraweera said that the outfit could inquire into disappearances in the North and East but other areas as well.

He said he believed Sri Lanka couldn’t afford to ignore wartime allegations and pretend that they did not exist.

Minister Samaraweera said that he, too, believed the military hadn’t used cluster munitions during the conflict. However, there was a need to investigate that allegation.

Minister Samaraweera was responding to the presidential commission to investigate complaints regarding missing persons and other alleged wartime atrocities strongly denying the use of such weapons as reported in July 6, 2016 edition of The Island. Minister Samaraweera criticized Chairman of the Commission former High Court judge Maxwell Paranagama for declaring that as the use of cluster ammunition had been banned on August 1, 2010, UNHRC couldn’t have found fault with Sri Lanka even if they had bee used.

Minister Samaraweera alleged that such talk caused suspicions among the minds of the people as regards the conduct of the military.

New constitution will not create a secular state

New constitution will not create a secular state

Jul 06, 2016

The chairman of the constitutional reform commission established to inquire public opinion Advocate Lal Wijenaike said it is baseless that few people alleged that there will be a secular state created following the constitutional amendment.

The chairman said it is his committee’s responsibility to acquire public opinion needed to submit the report necessary for the constitutional reforms and said it would be unreasonable to allege that Sri Lanka would be a secular country. The chairman further stressed at the same time that the government in power should not be biased to one religion.

He said he has not made any personal recommendations to the report and his task is to only acquire and disclose the public opinion gathered.

There were few opinions about religion, when inquiring public opinion based on the information submitted we present our recommendations. 18 people participated when inquiring opinions. Ten out of them said that according to the 9th statement in the constitution Buddhism should be prioritized and protected.

Five people who gave their opinion said that Sri Lanka should be a secular state. There were many opinions given. We gave our recommendations accordingly. Majority of the people’s opinion is to prioritize Buddhism.

The chairman of the commission established to inquire public opinion about constitutional reform Advocate Lal Wijenaaike said therefore according to the report of his committee, he cannot recommend Sri Lanka to be a secular state.

Another Sinhala-Muslim Conflict Brewing: Government Caught Napping!


Colombo Telegraph
By Lukman Harees –July 6, 2016
Lukman Harees
Lukman Harees
Astrologers are no strangers to Sri Lankan politics. Sumanadasa predicted a MR victory in 2015 and later gave some interesting reasons when it misfired. There was another type of astrological prediction recently in a newspaper which was both comical and uncanny. An astrologist named Sameera Chandrasiri from Helabima newspaper in his column, in a crafty way predicted an impending Sinhala-Muslims conflict soon and attributed cattle slaughter during Ramazan time( there’s no cattle slaughter during Ramazan time!), Deforestation (reference to Rishard Badurdeen), illegal settlements (reference to Murichikutti settlements of War refugees) and humiliating/insulting and challenging the Sons of the Soil/ Maha Sangha, as possible causes/ sparks for such a conflagration, and underlined the need to remove them as otherwise it will be harmful to the country’s rulers.
Leave aside the comical aspects of the prediction itself and the possible causes, there is truth in the fact, that there is an impending racial conflict involving the Sinhalese and the Muslims in the brewing and Sri Lanka is sitting atop a social volcano waiting to explode at any moment. There is no need for an astrologer to predict this calamity, as any observer with a fine tuned common sense will and can see telling signs of this gathering storm.
Ethnic or religious clashes or conflagrations have not been anything novel or new to the Sri Lankan Dharma Dweepaya. Modern Ceylon’s first ethno-religious riots targeted not Tamils but Muslims in 1915. Then, ever since Independence, there were many ethnic conflagrations mainly between Sinhalese and Tamils. Many have argued that the rise and institutionalisation of Sinhala-Buddhist nationalism in post-independent Sri Lanka bear much responsibility for today’s ethnic conflicts between the majority Sinhalese state and the minorities. Upon the heels of the end of a protracted Sinhala Tamil ethnic conflict which aggravated with the now infamous 1983 pogrom against the Tamils , there came the well-orchestrated hate campaign against the next biggest minority –the Muslims, which culminated in the Aluthgama dubbed by many analysts as a mini-1983. Sinhalese Christians were targeted too.
Drawing parallels between 1983 riots and 2014 Aluthgama riots may not be fair, but few similarities can be identified. One such similarity being not just the inaction on the part of the then-governments to act decisively and firmly on time but also shameful attempts to brand the victims as perpetrators. Post-war period under MR was a time of immense pressure for the minorities. Tamils after difficult times under the ruthless Tigers were thrown into disarray and marginalized due to the arrogant ,supremacist and majoritarian polices adopted by MR. Many were languishing in refugee camps while no plausible solutions were offered to sort out their genuine grievances .International community put Sri Lanka on the dock for the excesses committed by the Armed Forces during the last stages of the War. Muslims on the other hand went through hell when many hate groups with implicit State support, operated without fear or sanction throwing all decencies to the wind, while the silent majority watched helplessly. Muslim politicians were caught napping. Sri Lanka became once again ,almost a pariah state in the eyes of the world.
Untitled-5
Wednesday, 6 July 2016
logo
Free education may have served the purpose of politicians by keeping up a façade of equality, but it is time to take off our rose-tinted glasses and begin to look at the reality of education and social mobility in Sri Lanka, beginning with a better understanding of issues of social mobility in general
Untitled-2Whenever I travel out of Colombo visiting places from childhood, I am struck by what little education has done to bridge social classes. After more than 70 years of free education, the gran children of village headmen and the grandchildren of those who served the village headmen seem to be more or less in the same relative positions.

It seems both groups have moved horizontally within their social classes, but vertically, the groups seem as distant as, or more distant, than ever. As issues of social mobility are shaking up the developed world, we need to look at issues of social mobility in our own backyard more closely.

According to the 2015 British Social Attitudes Survey by NatCen Social Research organisation, years of austerity and the end of a “golden age” of upward social mobility in late 20th century Britain may have been a major factor in the vote to Brexit. Across the Atlantic in the USA, Grusky and Mitnik, at the Center on Poverty and Inequality, use a new data set provided to them by the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to generate an IGE, or an intergenerational elasticity indicator.
An IGE can be between 0 and 1, with 0 representing total economic mobility and 1 representing the absence of it. If IGE is equal to 1, all parental income advantages in a society are passed onto the next generation in the form of higher earnings with no room for social mobility. In the past, estimates of IGE in the United States have ranged from 0.34 to 0.6, but Grusky and Mitnik’s numbers suggest its closer to 0.6. There are many other measures of social mobility, but the message is clear: investments in public education and other programs notwithstanding, the best bet for success is to be born to wealthy parents.

In Sri Lanka, there is little research on social mobility, but the link between education and social mobility is assumed. As a former Prime Minister remarked at a South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) forum, “Free education has to a great extent contributed towards social equity and upward social mobility in Sri Lanka. Poverty is no bar to education in Sri Lanka, because not only the schools and the teaching but also books and school uniforms are provided free by the State” (SAARC, 28 March 2009).

Free education may have served the purpose of politicians by keeping up a façade of equality, but it is time to take off our rose-tinted glasses and begin to look at the reality of education and social mobility in Sri Lanka, beginning with a better understanding of issues of social mobility in general.

Read More

Australian Voting, Hung Parliament, and Lessons for Democracy

Auz_votesThe lessons of Australian elections are not only for Australia or for developed countries. These trends of the new information age and increasing autonomous voter behaviour are also the trends in countries like Sri Lanka as became partly evident in the last year’s two elections. These will enlarge in the future. Stability is not something that should be cobbled at the expense of good governance or decency in politics under the circumstances. Two main lessons could be drawn, particularly thinking of Sri Lanka.
by Laksiri Fernando  

There is a level of disillusionment with politics, with government, and with the major parties.’ ~ Malcolm Turnbull (PM)

( July 6, 2016, Sydney, Sri Lanka Guardian) As we move deeper into the 21st century, considerable changes in attitudes and preferences, or what we could simply call ‘voting behaviour,’ seem to take place among the voters and citizens of major representative democratic systems. This was evident two weeks ago at the Brexit referendum and now confirmed by the Australian parliamentary elections at the weekend. People are moving away from the traditional political parties, and the leaders, and they seem to vote flexibly on issues or policies rather than on political party lines. This could be a result of what we could call the ‘new information age’ in respect of democracy.

Information Age, also known as ‘computer age,’ ‘digital age’ or ‘new media age’ is usually refereed to the economic changes that have taken place as a result of increased use of computer based (digital) information for the industrial/service products, marketing, distribution and sales. This is more or less becoming the same for the polity and electoral processes it seems. Voters or the citizens (also the political parties) are using the same technologies for their informed decisions and voting. The voters are becoming more autonomous and self-determined compared to the earlier generations without depending much on political parties; and the digital information or ‘propaganda’ supplied by the political parties are considered one among others by the voters. The result at the moment is volatile or even ‘outraged voters’ clearly moving away from the directives of the (traditional) political parties.

After Brexit

At the Brexit referendum both the two major political parties, the Conservatives and the Labour, almost officially asked the voters to vote to ‘remain’ within the EU. It is true that some of the leaders of these parties were hesitant or, in the case of the conservative leader Boris Johnson, even defiant and campaigned for a ‘leave’ vote. However, it was only the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) that campaign for the ‘leave’ vote as a significant political party and it was also a new ‘single issue party.’ It was mostly by the network called the ‘Leave Vote’ formed on cross-party lines that campaign for the Brexit. Even after the closing of the vote that Thursday, Nigel Farage admitted possible defeat. But the result turned out to be different, 52 percent voting to ‘leave.’ There was a clear defiance against the existing leaders apart from other political cross currents including xenophobia and extreme nationalism.

There is clear defiance against leaders particularly when they call for elections or referenda believing that they could outsmart the voters and get away with what they want. This was true even in the case of Sri Lanka in 2015. Mahinda Rajapaksa called for presidential elections two years before its schedule and got badly defeated humiliatingly. David Cameron called for the unwarranted Brexit referendum arrogantly and now he himself has to leave the premiership after the defeat. This is also the case in Australia although full results are not yet out at the time of this is written. Malcolm Turnbull called for the parliamentary elections early, calling for stability, and even advised to dissolve the Senate (a double dissolution) believing that he could get away. He is now even in a difficulty in forming a minority government and there will be a more chaotic Senate as a result, no major party commanding a majority. He or more correctly his Liberal Party held 90 seats before and now he has fell below the magic number 76 in a parliament of 150 members to form a stable government.

Australian Voting  

The Australian electorate is very much similar to Sri Lanka in terms of the number of voters of around 15 million. However in Australia, voting is compulsory and non-voting at elections without proper reason might put you in jail. In 1996, I almost got into trouble by supporting a ‘conscious objector,’ Albert Langer, who canvassed among voters not to give preferences for major parties. Otherwise, I have always been a Labour supporter. Langer was convicted for violating the Elections Act but then released after an appeal was heard by a full bench Federal Court. He didn’t advocate abstention, but asked voters to give preferences only to a small party or parties by voting 1, 2, 2, 2, …or 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, … This is now accepted as a valid way of voting, if all the necessary boxes are marked. My article appeared in the ‘Human Rights Defender’ (UNSW) titled “Albert Langer: Australia’s First Political Prisoner” and I was modestly gratified to see that someone republished that article recently 

In Australia, voting takes place in different forms – pre-polling, postal vote, absentee voting and proper voting on the polling day. As a result, and for other reasons, counting takes time which is not good for political or economic stability. After completion of the elections on Saturday (2 July), still final results are not known even today (6 July). After counting much of the days voting and pre-polling, on the same day, the counting of the remaining postal votes and absentee votes only commenced yesterday (5 July) apparently because of new security measures. There is a tendency for voters to go for pre-polling which was held throughout a week this time. While the total registered voters are around 15.6 million (95 of the eligible), over 4 million had gone for pre-polling this time. Postal votes and absentee votes would amount to around 1.5 million.

An increasing feature this time is intentional informal (spoiled) voting. This supports our ‘hypothesis’ that voters in the information age becoming restless and cynical about traditional political parties and leaders. In Gilmore, an electorate not very far from where I live, 4,000 have intentionally spoiled their votes, while the so far counted gap between the Liberal and Labour is only a tiny 407 votes. Apart from informally voting for ‘dick and balls,’ some have voted for Harambe, the gorilla who was unreasonably killed in Cincinnati zoo!   

A Hung Parliament?

When the first round of counting was completed on Saturday night, the Elections Commission gave the following tentative figures as ‘those who lead’ with all indications of a hung parliament. Labour 71; Liberal/National 67; Greens 1 Katter’s Australian Party 1; Nick Xenophon Team 2; Independents 2; and ‘not yet determined as 6. However, the ABC ‘predictions’ were different giving Liberal/National 68 and Labour 67 considering 10 as undecided. Whatever the way the remaining or undecided 10 seats go, it is clear that no party Liberal or Labour would obtain at least 76 seats to have a majority government in the House of Representatives of 150 members.

Only possibility is the Liberals gaining few more seats out of the ‘undecided’ 10. It is believed that the postal voting, mostly of senior citizens, would tilt towards the Liberals. The situation in the Senate would be much more complicated even if Liberal or Labour managed to form a minority government with the understanding or support of the cross bench. The Liberal/National Party is already a coalition of four parties unlike the Labour Party.    

While Australia does not have a proportional representation system for the lower house like in New Zealand or Sri Lanka, to finally elect a candidate for an electoral division, preferential voting is in operation. If a candidate does not obtain an absolute majority (50% <) from the first preferences (primary vote), the other preferences are counted until an absolute majority is obtained. This system ensures MPs with credible support of voters from the respective divisions or seats, but finally the party voting in electorates does not proportionally reflect in Parliament at all. For example, around 25 percent of voters believe to have voted for small parties and independent candidates at the present election. However, their representation will not be proportional and all indications are that only around 6 members (6 percent) will be elected while they may be entitled to over 30 seats, if a proper PR system is in operation.

Many parliamentary systems are moving towards ‘hung parliaments’ not just because of proportional representation (New Zealand) or two major parties usually go neck to neck after a ‘majority government’ (Australia or UK in 2010) but because the voters are becoming increasingly disillusioned of major parties under the current information age. This has been very evident in many state level elections in the country (QLD, NSW, VIC). As the incumbent Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, himself has admitted, ‘There is a level of disillusionment with politics, with government, and with the major parties’ (‘The Huffington Post,’ 5 July 2016). It is true that it is not only a predicament of the Liberals. Even the primary vote of the Labour has become all time low since the end of the war. At this elections, many Labour and Liberal candidates are getting elected only on the basis of second (or third?) preferences.

New Trends

Although the reasons are not clearly identified yet through careful research, some of the trends are evident. What I happened to observe as a human rights issue of Albert Langer in 1996 has enlarged as a common antipathy against major parties. There are hundreds (or even thousands?) of ‘Albert Langers’ today behind the FB, Twitter and the Social Media in general. Of course there are dangers of the situation. The right wing, xenophobia or even racism can get expression through these new channels and opportunities. For example, Pauline Hansen’s One Nation party has come forward again at the federal elections.  

However, the situation might not be equated to the 1930s in Europe, in my opinion, which gave rise to fascism. The thinking of the people, particularly the youth, are fairly advanced and democratic. There can be an element of anarchism which is worrying. The technologies are advanced, open and accessible easily and cheaply. Therefore, there are immense possibilities to counter the possible adverse effects and trends.

The reasons why particularly the youth (or even the older voters) prefer small parties or independents can be numerous. Voters are becoming more and more autonomous in this information age. They are interested in diverse issues both national and local. They range from environment to domestic violence, from gay rights to job security in particular industries. The major parties are increasingly becoming incapable of addressing micro and these diverse issues. These are some reasons why the Katter’s Party or the Nick Xenophon’s Team has come forward apart from the Independents and The Greens to fill the emerging vacuums.  

Any of the above is not reason to completely abandon or underestimate the importance of the major or traditional parties. They may also need to adapt to the situation through flexible ways, means, policies and manifestos. However, there are clear challenges to the democratic systems and even for the economies. At least in countries like Australia or the United Kingdom or Europe the state structures or administrative arrangements are firmly in place to carry on the day-to-day public services for the benefit of the people. Although it is not well established, even the business sectors are quite used to live with unstable or minority governments. Those uncertainties are not necessarily inimical to democracy. Markets or businesses may have to leave a bigger margin for ‘political instability’ in their strategic planning in the future.  

Two Lessons

As John Warhurst, Emeritus Professor of Political Science at ANU, has summarized (ABC News, 5 July 2016):

“The maths are quite clear and I think the social situation in Australia is equally clear. The major parties are losing support, they’re losing membership, they’re having a crisis of identity, and the Australian community has made it clear that they quite like the idea of voting for minor parties and independents.”

The lessons of Australian elections are not only for Australia or for developed countries. These trends of the new information age and increasing autonomous voter behaviour are also the trends in countries like Sri Lanka as became partly evident in the last year’s two elections. These will enlarge in the future. 
Stability is not something that should be cobbled at the expense of good governance or decency in politics under the circumstances. Two main lessons could be drawn, particularly thinking of Sri Lanka.

First is to strengthen the state/administrative and democratic structures, with professionally trained and competent people, independent of the day-to-day politics, which could withstand any of the instabilities that would emerge in the electorates/elections in the future. This means competent and independent judiciary, public service and the police (also the security forces).

Second is for the civil society and civil society activists to take initiatives and fill the vacuum/s that the electorates create by moving away from the traditional parties in order that the democratic system is stabilized without falling into anarchism or into the hands of xenophobic nationalists.   

Why Keheliya Says Our Honourables In Diyawanna Must Undergo Psychiatric Examination


Colombo Telegraph
By Shyamon Jayasinghe –July 7, 2016
Shyamon Jayasinghe
Shyamon Jayasinghe
Keheliya Rambukwella,MP, has proposed to the Speaker that all MPs should go through a psychiatric test. One can speculate that the proposal came from self-realisation.
This gentleman came to Australia while he was Minister under Mahinda RajapaksaHis son,in the cricket team, was undergoing surgery and fatherly love brought him Down Under at taxpayer expense. He stayed in a Five Star for some days and one fine such day he was reported as having fallen off the third floor of the hotel down to the bushes in the ground floor. Down the palling!
Gossip being the blood of Sri Lankans, stories were constructed about how The Honourable could have had this strange fall. Some gossipers said he was drunk because he had a reputation for intoxication. Others alleged Keheliya stealthily went to peep into the neighbouring room and missed his step. Whatever the truth of all these are The Honourable managed to get some Twenty Million Rupees from the President’s Fund! It is alleged he had also got over a hundred thousand dollars as settlement from the hotel that kept his body and mind. We do not know if he had private insurance, in addition. If so, he is entitled to that,too. Well, let us not envy the poor Honourable bloke. The point is that he fell from floor number three down to floor zero and so one must sympathise.
Rajapaksa and Media m Minister Rambukwella
We have to guess the condition of the mind of a man who would have undertaken such a Quixotic adventure. By the way, this is the 100th death anniversary of the famous Spanish novelist, Cervantes, who wrote the classic Don Quixote. It is appropriate time to analyse this. I wish we had the services of the psychiatrist. Was it a DNA condition? Didn’t Keheliya’s cricketer- son try to open the window of an aeroplane while flying over 30,000 feet high? Whatever, let’s hope Keheliya sets the example, goes to a psychiatrist and assure us that he is fit and running for the post of MP.