Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Sunday, May 29, 2016

Capitalizing Happiness ( Must watch Documentary)

ricarado_semler


( May 27, 2016, Boston, Sri Lanka Guardian) Ricardo Semler is a wealthy and successful man. He’s one of the world’s most influential entrepreneurs. He’s the majority owner of Semco Partners, one of the most profitable companies in Brazil. He’s the author of the global bestseller Maverick, an informative business memoir that offers advice on how to craft a fulfilled life of financial reward much like his own. He is celebrated all around the globe, and his expertise is sought by the likes of the TED Talks conference and Harvard Business School. By all accounts, Semler is a happy man. Ironically, as detailed in the revealing new documentary Capitalizing Happiness, he earned his fortune by making others happy as well.

When he inherited his father’s company at the age of 20, Semler witnessed a work force that was fearful of termination, under tremendous pressures from their job demands, and generally unhappy in their working life. Understanding the power of collaboration through his previous experience playing in musical bands, Semler decided to reinvent his company’s work culture. His employees would no longer be made to feel that they were slaves of industry. They would be treated like free and valued individuals, and allowed to work at their own pace.

When we first see this workforce in action, several employees are resting in hammocks. This is a period of their work day that they reserve for peace and relaxation. As long as their work gets done on time, they’re free to spend their days in the office however they see fit.

Semco Partners employees love their jobs, and their satisfaction makes them more productive and engaged. Under Semler’s groundbreaking workplace model, the company has increased its annual revenue by well over 200 million US dollars.

His employees and the worldwide business community alike regard Semler as somewhat of a mythic figure. Capitalizing Happiness gives us unprecedented access behind the gates of his Brazilian estate, and captures valuable insights into his life and his business philosophy, which are both infused with the values of love, transparency and trust. The film provides a thoughtful and inspiring portrait of a true modern-day pioneer.

Want to know the secret to finding success in business? All you need is love.

Saudi Women Are Getting Down to Business

Saudi Women Are Getting Down to Business

BY ELIZABETH DICKINSON-JANUARY 28, 2016

JEDDAH, Saudi Arabia — Zakia Attar strides through the racks of colorful abayas, running her hands along the fabric. She checks that the garments are perfectly arranged to attract customers and then proudly introduces her salesclerk, a fellow Saudi woman. Behind the carefully arranged shelves and the cash register in a small back office, Attar’s husband, Sulaiman Magboul, takes inventory and tallies up daily sales. A banker by profession, Magboul runs the financial side of Zakia Attar Designs.

Attar is a designer — one of a growing crop of young Saudi women seeking to add more flare to the traditional modest wear required of females here. She is no activist; Attar insists that women dress in a way that conceals their figures and says she enjoys a great deal about Saudi Arabia’s traditional gender roles. Nonetheless, her story shows how women in the workplace are changing the very social foundation of Saudi Arabia. Since she started her clothing line, it has become much more than just a source of income. Attar is also a wife and mother of four, and it’s those roles that have seen the biggest transformation since her boutique opened in 2012.

“This business is now my relationship with my husband,” Attar says. “He started respecting me: ‘My wife has value, she has talent, she is making me money.…’ Before it was just ‘my wife, the caregiver, the cook.’ Now it’s ‘my wife, my partner.’”

Not long ago, Attar’s story would have seemed impossible in Saudi Arabia. This is a country, after all, where until recently women had access to only a few professions, such as nursing and teaching. A series of reforms begun under former King Abdullah has changed all that, allowing females to take up a range of jobs, from sales to services to administration. As more and more professions have opened to women, female entrepreneurs and businesswomen like Attar have seized every opportunity, no matter how small.Today, women can be found running shops and businesses, tech firms and start-ups. The number of female employees has grown 48 percent since just 2010, and the high female unemployment rate, at 33 percent, paradoxically shows that record numbers of Saudi women are trying to get out of the house and into the workplace.

These changes are turning Saudi Arabia’s traditional social structure on its head. Women legally remain dependents here: They require permission of a male guardian — a father, husband, or son — to travel and study. They can’t drive. But as they have started working, they have gained a newfound independence from the simple fact of having an income. It’s such financial power that could prove a game-changer for women’s rights in the kingdom.

The growing presence of working women is already reshaping the tradition of the Saudi marriage contract, a document drawn up by families ahead of an engagement. Marrying a working girl was once taboo; it showed her family didn’t have enough money to care for her. “For my husband, he had the idea that women should be at home,” says Fedhah Al Dosary, a mother of two and a computer programmer by trade who recently persuaded her husband and conservative in-laws to let her work.

Fearful of rocking the boat, she waited several years into her marriage to ask whether she could take on a job. “[My husband] thought, ‘She doesn’t need to work. I have a good job, so she doesn’t need to work.’”
Those views are changing, and today, many grooms’ families seek out bachelorettes with jobs. “It’s desirable now” to have a wife who works, says Khaled Al Maeena, former editor of the Saudi 
Gazette newspaper. “Two-income families are becoming the norm.” Indeed, in the first quarter of 2015, roughly 1.3 million of the nearly 1.9 million women employed in Saudi Arabia were married, according to the Ministry of Labor.

Brides’ fathers, meanwhile, increasingly demand that the right to study and work be explicitly guaranteed in the marriage contract, according to interviews with dozens of young women here. Specifying a woman’s rights at the time of engagement would prevent her husband from later preventing her from working or studying. Statistics back up this shift: 52 percent of university students are now women, many of them married.

Inside some marriages, too, the power dynamic has begun to shift. Attar has seen this happen firsthand: When she and Magboul married 14 years ago, she had just returned home from studying for seven years in Switzerland and the United States. She had a communications degree and every ambition to start a career, but found it difficult to secure a job in the media industry. Soon, responsibilities multiplied: There were four children and a home to care for.

By 2008, Attar had grown restless. Her mother-in-law had taught her how to tailor, and she started to make her own clothing. Word of her uniquely bright abayas slowly got out among her friends, who appreciated the garments’ combination of fashion and modesty. Attar sewed more and more, setting up trunk shows around the peak shopping times of Ramadan and the Hajj pilgrimage.

Magboul took note as his wife’s business grew. As she displayed her wares at boutiques around town, Attar said, “my husband started to realize that [the shops] were taking too much of a percentage from me and I wasn’t earning as much as I should.”

Without telling his wife, Magboul began to look for places to set up a shop of their own. Red Sea Mall in Jeddah offered affordable rent, and one day he made his pitch. “And by the way, I already signed the [lease] agreement,” he added at the end, by Attar’s retelling. Magboul also put in a financial commitment and dealt with most of the paperwork, since the majority of property contracts require a man’s signature. Not long after, their first boutique opened its doors.

Attar’s shift into a new role wasn’t always easy for the couple. Suddenly there were two sources of income and two opinions that carried equal weight — two decision-makers with views about how to run the business and the home. “I never had challenges with my relationship the way I did when I opened my business,” Attar remembers.

That turmoil is showing up in marriages more and more, social counselors here say. “The role of women in the household is different now because the women used to be followers but now they are leaders,” says Maha Abdallah Al Qattan, a social counselor in Riyadh. “Financially also, they start to argue about who pays for what since women have their own jobs and get paid. It’s about authority.”

Meanwhile, growing numbers of women are divorcing husbands who are not supportive of their ambitions. Divorce rates in Saudi Arabia have skyrocketed in recent years, and government statistics indicate that wives’ desires to work is a flash point for conflict. Local media have reported that in 2011 some 40 percent of khula divorces — those in which the wife asks for separation — came after a husband forced her to quit her job.

Those numbers are the foundation of a shift in Saudi society, argue analysts like Al Maeena. “The girls are not marrying just to marry,” Al Maeena says. “Once there is financial independence for women, believe me, they will not care for [restrictive marriages] anymore.”

Economics may indeed be one of the greatest drivers for women’s rights in the years to come, specifically because the change happens within the family itself. “It does somehow change the relationship,” says Al Dosary, the young working mother. “With a job, I have my own money to buy things even without my husband.”

“Even without my husband” — those words are shattering the social expectations governing female life. Men may retain many legal rights over women, but their power at home could erode with time.
As Attar’s husband chimes in from the back office, “She does the hard work; she’s the front line. I’m in the back, just making sure it runs as smooth as possible.”
Elizabeth Dickinson
 English-speaking coalition forces were reportedly seen close to the frontlines near IS's major Iraqi stronghold 

Sunday 29 May 2016
Iraq's Kurdish peshmerga forces on Sunday launched an offensive aimed at retaking areas east of Mosul, the Islamic State group's main hub in the country, with reports that troops from the US coalition were also taking part on the ground.

The "peshmerga-led ground offensive, backed by international coalition warplanes" started before dawn, the Kurdistan Region Security Council (KRSC) said in a statement, with attacks on IS-controlled villages 20 kilometres east of Mosul.

IS had placed booby traps around the abandoned villages, Kurdish news site Rudaw reported, and used suicide bombers to try and repel the advance of some 5,500 peshmerga fighters.

"This is one of the many shaping operations expected to increase pressure on ISIL [IS] in and around Mosul in preparation for an eventual assault on the city," the KRSC said.

English-speaking soldiers from the US-led coalition were also seen loading armoured vehicles a few kilometres from the frontline on Sunday morning, Reuters reported, although it could not be confirmed that they were US operatives.

A coalition spokersperson based in Baghdad, US Colonel Steve Warren, said he could not confirm the nationaliy of the officers seen close to the frontlines, but confirmed that “US and coalition forces are conducting advise and assist operations to help Kurdish peshmerga forces”.

Six hours into the operation, peshmerga forces had retaken the village of Mufti, the statement said.
Following the retaking of Mufti, a peshmerga soldier involved in the operation told Rudaw that the village was unrecognisable after years of IS control.

“Life in this village was normal,” Khalid Jabbar told Rudaw. “But then IS came and destroyed everything.”

The operation around Mufti – just a 25-minute drive from the IS stronghold of Mosul – aims to extend the frontline for anti-IS forces hoping eventually to recapture the group's largest base in Iraq.

The fresh push against IS comes a week after Iraqi forces launched an operation against Fallujah, about 400 kilometres to the south, IS's only other major urban hub in Iraq.

Family of driver killed in US strike on Taliban leader file criminal case

Relatives of Mohammad Azam, killed while driving Mullah Mansoor across Pakistan, lodge a first investigation report for murder

The family of Mohammad Azam, the taxi driver killed in US drone strike on Mullah Mansoor, say no one from the government has contacted them about compensation. Photograph: Jon Boone for the Guardian--- A local newspaper report of the killing of Mullah Akhtar Mansoor in a US drone strike. Photograph: Rahmat Gul/AP
Mohammad Azam, the taxi driver killed in US drone strike on Mullah Mansoor. Photograph: Jon Boone for the Guardian

Kiyya Baloch and in Islamabad-Sunday 29 May 2016

The family of a taxi driver who was killed in a drone strike while driving the leader of the Afghan Taliban across Pakistan have lodged a criminal case against the US government.

Mohammad Azam was killed on 21 May while unwittingly taking Taliban leader Mullah Akhtar Mansoor from the Iranian border to Quetta, the capital of Balochistan.

The unprecedented attack has thrown into uncertainty possible peace talks with the Taliban as well as US-Pakistan relations.

It has also devastated the family of Azam, who had been working for more than eight years as a driver in Taftan, a tiny desert town next to an important border crossing with Iran.

“He was the sole breadwinner of our large joint family, this was an attack on our family that hardly earns enough for two meals a day,” said Mohammad Qasim, Azam’s older brother.

Azam supported his wife, four children, and a disabled brother called Yar Muhammad.

A week after his death his children remain distraught and tearful. They describe their father as a “martyr”.

“Who will feed them now?” asked Qasim. “I appeal to the civilised world, including all those human rights bodies, to investigate the brutal murder of my brother and compensate his children.”

He has filed a “first investigation report” for murder, naming the “US authorities” who claimed responsibility for the attack. The police are now obliged to investigate the matter. “I want justice and demand action against the US authorities,” the document reads.

It was a series of chance occurrences that led to Azam finding one of the US’s most wanted men sitting in his white Toyota Corolla.

Azam got much of his work though a small local transport company owned by Habib Saoli, which has its office near the exit of the Iranian-Pakistani border facility that straddles the border.

Mansoor emerged from that building shortly after 9am on 21 May, returning to Pakistan after a long visit to Iran which, it has been reported, was for both medical attention and to visit members of his family.
He was passing himself off as a Pakistani citizen using a passport and national ID card with the false name Muhammad Wali.

He immediately began looking for a ride for the 600km journey to the city of Quetta.
Said Ahmed Jan, an employee of a bus company, was trying to fill up the final seats of his Quetta-bound minibus but Mansoor wasn’t interested.

“He said, ‘I want to go in a car’, so I called Habib and asked him to provide a car,” said Jan. “Habib took a little commission and gave the job to Azam.”

Saoli said he could not remember whether Mansoor, who initially tried to haggle down the 14,000 rupees (£90) charge, had ever used one of his cars before.

Mansoor was likely to have thought himself safe given the US is not known to have carried out any operations inside Balochistan despite the vast province being home to many of the Taliban commanders with which the US has been at war for 15 years.

The situation is unlike Waziristan, a tribal region hundreds of miles to the north, where militant commanders operate in constant fear of the CIA’s extensive drone programme.

In Waziristan the targets are usually groups affiliated with al-Qaida or the Haqqani Network, a Taliban ally. It is almost unheard of for senior members of the core Afghan Taliban, often known as the Quetta Shura, to be attacked inside Pakistan.

However the US had already decided if it got the chance to kill Mansoor, who the Pentagon described as an “obstacle to peace” who was actively preventing Taliban commanders from holding talks with representatives of the Afghan government.

Attempting to foster such a reconciliation process is now a key part of US strategy in the region, with the country having backed a Pakistan-led effort to bring the two sides together.

But Mansoor had been responsible for soaring violence in Afghanistan, forcing the Kabul government to abandon some territory to the insurgents.

It is not known why the US waited to strike until Mansoor had completed more than two-thirds of his journey, having been on the road for almost six hours.
Mullah Akhtar Mansoor threat to peace, says Kerry after drone strike

But the car was finally destroyed by missile strikes in the mid-afternoon, shortly after the pair had taken a rest stop near the town of Ahmad Wal, roughly 35km from Afghan airspace.

Qasim said he could not believe the news of his brother’s death when he received it, or understand how the leader of the Taliban could have been able to travel so freely.

“Why didn’t the hundreds of paramilitary troops stop him like they do with the common passengers?” he asked.

“Why did the Americans kill him just for driving a car?” he asked. “It was not written on [Mansoor’s] forehead that he is a Taliban leader. He was travelling with valid documents.”

Mureed Shah, a local government official for the area, said Azam had “no links with any militant group”.
“I know Azam personally. He was working on a low-paid job to support his poor family,” Shah said. “I have written to the government in Quetta to pay compensation to the family.”

Qasim said no one from the government had as yet contacted him about compensation.

The US army has made payments to civilian victims of military operations, including drone strikes, just over the border in Afghanistan, but not in Pakistan.

Mustafa Qadri, a drones expert from Amnesty International, said the family had a right to bring a claim and demand damages.

“The US has itself said very openly that it seeks to minimise civilian casualties and provide compensation and other damages to civilians who die,” he said.

“So if this is justified as a spill over from the Afghan conflict why has the US not said anything about the unintended victim of this strike?”

Between 700-900 migrants may have died at sea this week: NGOs

Migrants are seen on a capsizing boat before a rescue operation by Italian navy ships 'Bettica' and 'Bergamini' (unseen) off the coast of Libya in this handout picture released by the Italian Marina Militare on May 25, 2016. Marina Militare/Handout via REUTERS---Migrants from a capsized boat are rescued during a rescue operation by Italian navy ships 'Bettica' and 'Bergamini' off the coast of Libya in this handout picture released by the Italian Marina Militare on May 25, 2016. Marina Militare/Handout via
REUTERS
Migrants from a capsized boat are rescued during a rescue operation by Italian navy ships 'Bettica' and 'Bergamini' off the coast of Libya in this handout picture released by the Italian Marina Militare on May 25, 2016. Marina Militare/Handout via REUTERS---Bergamini' off the coast of Libya in this handout picture released by the Italian Marina Militare on May 25, 2016. Marina Militare/Handout via
REUTERS




BY STEVE SCHERER-Mon May 30, 2016

At least 700 migrants may have died at sea this past week in the busiest week of migrant crossings from Libya towards Italy this year, Medecins San Frontieres and the UN Refugee agency said on Sunday.

About 14,000 have been rescued since Monday amid calm seas, and there have been at least three confirmed instances of boats sinking. But the number of dead can only be estimated based on survivor testimony, which is still being collected.

"We will never know exact numbers," Medecins San Frontieres said in a Tweet after estimating that 900 had died during the week. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said more than 700 had drowned.

Migrants interviewed on Saturday in the Sicilian port of Pozzallo told of a large fishing boat that overturned and sank on Thursday with many women and children on board.

Initial estimates were that 400 people died, but the UN Refugee agency said on Sunday there may have been about 670 passengers on board.

According to testimony collected by EU border agency Frontex, when the motorless fishing boat capsized, 25 swam to the boat that had been towing it, while 79-89 others were saved by rescuers and 15 bodies were recovered. This meant more than 550 died, the UNHCR said.

The migrants -- fleeing wars, oppression and poverty -- often do not know how to swim and do not have life jackets. They pay hundreds or thousands of dollars to make the crossing from Libya to Italy, by far the most dangerous border passage for migrants in the world.

This week's arrivals included Eritreans, Sudanese, Nigerians and many other West Africans, humanitarian groups say. Despite the surge this week, as of Friday 40,660 arrivals had been counted, 2 percent fewer than the same period of last year, the Interior Ministry said.

Most of the boats this week appear to have left from Sabratha, Libya, where many said smugglers had beaten them and women said they had been raped, said MSF, which has three rescue boats in the area.
The migrants are piled onto flimsy rubber boats or old fishing vessels which can toss their occupants into the sea in a matter of seconds.

About 100 are thought to have either been trapped in the hull or to have drowned after tumbling into the sea on Wednesday.

On Friday, the Italian Navy ship Vega collected 45 bodies and rescued 135 from a "half submerged" rubber boat. It is not yet known exactly how many were on board, but the rubber boats normally carry about 300.

"Some were more shaken than others because they had lost their loved ones," Raffaele Martino, commander of the Vega, told Reuters on Sunday in the southern port of Reggio Calabria, where the Vega docked with the survivors and corpses, including those of three infants.

"It's time that Europe had the courage to offer safe alternatives that allow these people to come without putting their own lives or those of their children in danger," Tommaso Fabri of MSF Italy said.
(This refiled version of the story adds byline)

(Reporting by Steve Scherer; Additional reporting by Reuters TV in Reggio Calabria; Editing by Richard Balmforth)

The Speech Obama Should Have Given in Hiroshima

Obama_in_Hiroshima
Source: THE WHITE HOUSE / Office of the Press Secretary

by Matt Peppe
Barack Obama became the first U.S. President to visit Hiroshima on Friday, more than seven decades after the U.S. B-29 bomber Enola Gay dropped a 10,000-pound atomic bomb nicknamed “Little Boy” on the city whose military value was far less than that of Tampa to the United States. More than 70,000 people were instantly killed, and virtually the entire city was flattened. Many survivors would suffer prolonged and unimaginably painful aftereffects of radiation, which would cost at least 100,000 more people their lives. The effects of radiation would harm people for years and decades after the initial explosion.   

Obama stood at a podium with the epicenter of the blast, the Genbaku Domu, in the background and said that he had “come to mourn the dead.” While Obama mourned, there was one thing he did not do: apologize. 

He said that “death came from the sky.” No mention of why. Or who was responsible, as if it were a natural disaster rather than a crime perpetrated by actual people. Obama was either unwilling or unable to confront the truth and make amends. 

Here’s what he could have said to try to do so:
( May 29, 2016, Boston, Sri Lanka Guardian) Seventy-one years ago, on a bright cloudless morning, an American warplane unleashed the most horrific and inhuman weapon ever invented, immediately imperiling the survival of the entire human species. This act of terrorism was the ultimate crime: a crime of mass murder, a crime of war, and a crime against humanity.
The victims, those who died incinerated in a flash, and those who died slowly and painfully over years from chemical poisoning, were never able to see justice served. Sadly, there is no way the criminals who carried out this heinous and barbaric act will ever face justice for their crimes.
I cannot change that. But, there is one thing I can do as the leader of the nation in whose name the bombing of Hiroshima was carried out: I can tell you, residents of Hiroshima and the rest of Japan, that I am sorry. I am sorry on behalf of my government and my country. I wish an American President would have come earlier and said this. This apology is decades overdue. It is a small and symbolic act, but it is necessary as a first step for true reconciliation.
A nuclear bomb should have never been dropped on Hiroshima. The most important goal of mankind should be to ensure that no nuclear bomb is ever dropped again. Anywhere in the world. Ever.
It would be easy to stand here and tell you that there are reasons why the American military and political officials chose to use a nuclear bomb. I could say it served a greater good of saving lives that would have been lost if the war had continued. I could say it was a decision made by people who were dealing with the pressure and horrors of fighting a war. But that would not be the truth. Those would be empty rationalizations. There is no justification for the bomb. Period.
The truth is that by August 6, 1945 Japan was defeated and had been seeking a conditional surrender for months. And American war planners knew this. They knew it because they had cracked the Japanese code and were intercepting their messages. [1]
Japan was willing to surrender under the condition that their Emperor, who was seen as a God among the Japanese people, be allowed to maintain his throne and not be prosecuted for war crimes. The Emperor himself called for “a plan to end the war” six weeks before the fateful day. [2]  After so much unspeakable death and destruction, this reasonable offer should have been met with ecstatic celebration and relief.
Instead, U.S. officials disregarded it. They decided that it was necessary not just to defeat Japan, but to leave them utterly humiliated and disgraced. They wanted to demonstrate to their public that they could force another country to lay prostrate in front of them in complete submission. This is the mindset of terrorists, torturers, and sadists.
The United States joined with China and Great Britain to issue the Potsdam Declaration on July 26, in which they called on Japan “to proclaim now the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces.” These were terms they understood Japan could not accept.
Unfortunately, the use of the atomic bomb had become inevitable after the massive investment of time and treasure represented by the Manhattan Project. Military planners worried about “the possibility that after spending huge amounts of money … the bomb would be a dud. They could easily imagine being grilled mercilessly by hostile members of Congress.”
Historian and former Nuclear Regulatory Commission employee J. Samuel Walkerconfirmed that aside from “shortening the war and saving American lives, Truman wanted to justify the expense and effort required to build the atomic bombs.”
That financial considerations and a self-interested desire for bureaucrats to validate themselves and protect their careers could lead to the single most destructive and cruel act in history is an abomination. It is a deep offense to the idea that people are innately moral, and it makes us ask how in a democratic society we can vest people with the authority to make decisions of such profound impact secretly and without accountability?
Walker notes that another consideration for using the bomb on Hiroshima was to put fear into the leaders of the Soviet Union and make them “more amenable to American wishes.” Just six weeks earlier the UN Charter had been established. It included the demand that “all members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force” against other states. The drafters of the treaty could never have imagined such an unconscionable violation of their words so soon after the monumental pact had been written.
As horrific as the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was, it did not occur in a vacuum. What no one in mainstream American political discourse has so far been able to admit is that not only was there no justification for the bomb, there was little justification for the war against Japan in the first place.
The war was the result of the notion, which first emanated from the Council on Foreign Relations in 1941, that the U.S.’s “national interest” called for a “Grand Area” that consisted of the Western hemisphere, the British Empire and the Far East, while assuming the majority of Europe would be controlled by Nazi Germany. This was translated into a policy that demanded a military confrontation with Japan for control of the Far East. [3]
A pillar in this policy was an economic embargo against Japan. Cut off from imports and raw materials from the United States and Great Britain, Japan grew desperate and subsequently sought to expand its Empire. Japan saw itself in need of a sphere of influence involving the same areas in the Far East as the United States.
The U.S. had several options to avoid war. For one, they could develop a program of agricultural and economic self-sufficiency which would allow them to insulate themselves from dependence on colonial powers, as well as allow them to steer clear of unpredictable and potentially hostile regions of the world.
But for businessmen who wanted to maintain control over the direction of the economy and keep their own fortunes growing at a limitless pace, this was a nonstarter. Instead, they were dedicated to challenging Japan. Hence, the embargo and the buildup for an inevitable military confrontation over Eastern Asia.
This is the background to Pearl Harbor. Japan was obviously not justified for attacking sovereign American territory in a blatant act of aggression. But we cannot pretend that it was not predictable or logical from their point of view.
Japan felt itself backed into a corner by the embargo. They felt they needed to expand further into Asia. They believed that if they did so, the U.S. military would have attacked them. They were right.
Both countries should have worked together to recognize each other’s perceived interests, deescalate, and achieve a mutually acceptable compromise. It is the ability to understand one’s perceived adversary as a rational counterpart, rather than an evil and irrational enemy, that separates humans from beasts. If we are not able to use this ability, we are no better than a predator seeking his prey.
The nuclear bombing of Hiroshima did not need to happen. But the bombing that took place on this site was just a symptom of the war it was part of. War will necessarily produce horrific crimes, some of which are unimaginable at the time they happen. As horrific as the nuclear bomb was, 70 years of technological advancements have made not just the destruction of an entire city, but of an entire country or continent within the realm of possibility.
We need to eliminate nuclear weapons from the earth. But that is not enough. Chemical weapons like napalm, Agent Orange, depleted uranium, and white phosphorous; biological weapons like Dengue bacteria and germ bombs; and conventional weapons like cluster bombs, pineapple bomblets, butterfly bombs and land mines are just some of the savage weapons used by the U.S. military alone in the years since the close of World War II to kill and maim millions of people. Many other countries possess similar weapons of mass destruction and have the capacity to do the same.
We need to eliminate war. All war. Forever. War is evil, plain and simple. We cannot undo the actions of the past. But we can let them guide us to a better world where we don’t repeat the horrors that the people of Hiroshima suffered here 71 years ago. That will be the only way to prevent the victims from having died in vain.
References 
[1] Zinn, Howard. A People’s History of the United States: 1492-Present. New York: HarperCollins, 2003. pp. 423.
[2] U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey: The Effects of the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, June 19, 1946. President’s Secretary’s File, Truman Papers. http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/bomb/large/documents/index.php?pagenumber=33&documentid=65&documentdate=1946-06-19&studycollectionid=abomb&groupid=
[3] Shoup, Laurence H. and William Minter. Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations & United States Foreign Policy. Lincoln, NE: Authors Choice Press, 2004.
Matt Peppe writes about politics, U.S. foreign policy and Latin America on his blog. You can follow him on twitter.

Philippines: Crime journalist shot dead in Manila, 34th media member killed since 2010


Filipino student journalists hold slogans to commemorate the first anniversary of the country's worst election-related violence during a rally near the Malacanang  Presidential Palace in Manila. Pic: AP
Filipino student journalists hold slogans to commemorate the first anniversary of the country's worst election-related violence during a rally near the Malacanang Presidential Palace in Manila. Pic: AP

28th May 2016

A JOURNALIST has been killed by unidentified gunmen near a watch store owned by his family in the Filipino capital of Manila, making his death the 34th since former president Benigno Aquino III came into power in 2010.

Alex Balcoba, 56, was fatally attacked late on Friday evening, according to the National Press Club (NPC) of the Philippines in a statement posted on their Facebook page.

Balcoba was described as a crime journalist in an AFP report published by Rappler, and was the director of the Manila Police District Press Corps.

Club president Paul Gutierrez said: “Even as we take cognizance of the Manila Police District’s assurance of an ‘in-depth investigation’ of this latest act of violence at the heart of our nation’s capital thru the formation of a “special task group,” the incident again highlights the fact that criminality remains rampant and unchecked.

“The culture of impunity that is behind these attacks is yet to be addressed by the authorities despite their repeated boasts and promises,” he added.
Malacañang Palace, where the president of the country officially resides and works, issued a statement on Saturday condemning Balcoba’s murder.

According to the Manila Bulletin, the Palace said (translated): “We condemn this crime. [The Philippine National Police] are currently investigating to identify and track down whoever is responsible for this crime.”

However, the NPC are doubtful the police will truly bring any of the perpetrators to justice, as of the dozens of cases where members of the media have been killed, not one has been solved “where the suspects have been arrested and sentenced”.

The National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) also issued a statement condemning the murder, and urge incoming president Rodrigo Duterte to ensure an end to the murders they say have “plagued our blood-soaked land”.

They also called for Duterte to uphold basic human rights, especially those pertaining to freedom of speech and expression.

Zika crisis: WHO seeks to allay fears over Rio Olympics

Health workers get ready to spray insecticide to combat mosquitoes that transmits the Zika virus in Rio de Janeiro, 26 January
Brazil has sent teams to eradicate mosquitoes that carry the Zika virus

BBC28 May 2016

The World Health Organization (WHO) has played down concerns over the spread of the Zika virus, amid calls for the Rio Olympics in August to be postponed.

Senior WHO official Bruce Aylward told the BBC that risk assessment plans were in place, and reiterated that there was no need to delay the Games.

The mayor of Rio said disease-carrying mosquitoes were being eradicated.

The officials were responding to an open letter by scientists saying it was "unethical" for the Games to go ahead.

The letter also said the global health body should revisit its Zika guidance.
The Zika virus is linked to severe birth defects.


Between February and April, Brazil registered more than 90,000 likely cases of Zika. The number of babies born with Zika-linked defects stood at 4,908 in April.
Dr Bruce Aylward: "I think we need to do a better job of communicating with those concerned"


Dr Aylward, who heads the WHO's emergency programme, told the BBC that it was already carrying out a risk-assessment programme "about this disease and the risks it poses both to individuals who get and those who might be subsequently exposed".

In addition, he said, independent experts had reported to the WHO on the implications of the outbreak for travel and trade.

"Those are two of the exact measures that that group has asked for and that is exactly what is being done, and clearly we need to have better communicated that."

Challenge for the IOC - Dan Roan, Sports Editor, BBC News

The World Health Organization is key here. As long as it continues to reject pleas to cancel or move the Games from Rio, the IOC will feel confident.

No contingency plans are being put in place should the doomsday scenario occur.

And privately, the IOC seems more concerned by the doping crisis; allegations of state-sponsored cheating at the 2014 Sochi Games, and the question mark over the participation of Russian athletes in Rio, than it is by Zika.

But if the WHO changes its tune, the IOC would be left facing one of the biggest challenges in its history.
Two years ago, it had to bar young athletes from the Ebola-affected region of West Africa from participating in certain events at the Youth Olympic Games in Nanjing, China, to rule out infection. But this would be on a whole different scale.

More on the Zika crisis:


Map showing the countries that have had confirmed cases of the Zika virus

Microcephaly: Why it is not the end of the world
What you need to know Key questions answered about the virus and its spread
Travel advice Countries affected and what you should do
The mosquito behind Zika What we know about the insect
Abortion dilemma Laws and practices in Catholic Latin America
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has said it sees no reason to delay or move the Games because of the mosquito-borne disease.

Mr Aylward said that a call to postpone the Games could not be ruled out in the future, but added: "All the information available today... suggests that the games should definitely go ahead."

He restated the WHO's warning that women who are pregnant or seek to get pregnant should not travel to the Zika zone or be exposed to returning partners who may have been infected.

Postponing the games, at this stage, would only "compromise the huge investment that athletes and others have made in preparing for what should be a fantastic occasion."

In their open letter, the 150 scientists said Brazil's mosquito-eradication programme had failed. They cited this, and the country's "weakened" health system, as reasons to postpone or move the Olympics.

In his reply, Rio Mayor Eduardo da Costa Paes said:
  • The city has over 3,000 health officials monitoring the presence of mosquitoes across Rio
  • Inspections will be stepped up in August, a time of year when there are anyway fewer mosquitoes
  • A team of eradicators will start focusing on Olympic venues a month before the Games.
Zika infection in pregnant women has been shown to be a cause of microcephaly and other brain abnormalities in babies.

In February, the WHO declared recent outbreaks of those diseases in Latin America and French Polynesia a global health emergency requiring a united response.

It said stepping up programmes to eradicate mosquitoes that spread the Zika virus were a priority.

Saturday, May 28, 2016

And the moon sheds a drop of blood

Photo by Louis Cahill



BRIAN JEGANATHAN on 05/28/2016

In January last year, I visited Mullaitivu. Since it was after dusk, I decided to find lodging just for one night. During the day, I had the opportunity of listening to the horror stories of local Tamils who were caught in the final onslaught on Mullivaikkal and the alleged massacre of civilians in the government’s bid to decimate the LTTE, and institute its writ over the whole country.

The horrors of that war, conducted in secrecy without any witnesses, is now an open truth shouted out from the rooftops. Then, and even now it is considered a success story from a military and patriotic perspective, and a quintessential lesson in counter-insurgency, which the then government was eager to trade as an export commodity.

However, since May 2009 – NanthikadalMullivaikkal, and Pudu Mathalan – these ordinary names and their semantics have assumed Holocaust-proportion. Yet, the human depravity that produced such horrors have been obscured in the tribal triumphalism of war, while the abominable human sacrifice still remains buried deep down in the sands of Mullivaikkal and the blood-stained waters of Nanthikadal lagoon.

So, on the day I was in Mullaitivu, I ventured out into the moonlit night just before midnight. I drove over the Nanthikadal causeway into Mullivaikkal, while the whole region lay asleep in a shroud of tranquility. On my return, I chanced upon a young fisherman on the bridge, and, after exchanging pleasantries, he invited me for a “chat” while he engaged in casting his net for prawns.

Invariably, our conversation veered towards the inevitable: he recounted the tragic events of 2009, and listed more than a dozen names of relatives and friends he had lost in the final days of the war. Yet, I realized that he had an exuberant disposition and a deep yearning for peace with justice and dignity. He believed that justice could reach them only when politicians on both sides of the equation had political and moral honesty in their hearts. I agreed.

Then, when I was about to leave, pointing at the moon and the gurgling water under the bridge, he suddenly posed this puzzling question: “where on earth will you find a sublime night like the one the two of us are blessed with tonight?” It had a tinge of intrigue – a spectral quality, perhaps – that I could not frankly grasp.

The poem below is the result of my encounter with this young fisherman.
###
And the moon sheds a drop of blood

And the moon sheds a drop of blood
And then he appears on the Nanthikadal bridge,
dressed in white shirt and sarong, holy ash on forehead
reminding of cartwheel ruts on gravel paths in the monsoon –
an indelible branding of culture, one may say!

An accidental encounter that’s likely
when one takes a chance and steps into the night.
Wafer-thin moon suspended in the leaden sky
like a communion tablet ready for consecration.

We stop, where the bridge is widest.
His lantern’s faint light reflecting on the palmyrah basket;
fishing net, cutting knives, and tea in a flask;
and fresh betel for chewing

The military searchlights probe the night,
harsh shafts of white, gyrating – schizophrenic!
Yet, not a shred of fear in my bones
– I’m a southern guest at the army lodge –
camouflage-fence smelling of fresh paint.

Join me Sir, if you have time, he invites,
placing his basket and the lantern on the ground.
I grab his offer, settling on the asphalt ledge;
dangling feet slicing the foam-white spray beneath

With the proverbial fisherman’s grit,
he plunges himself neck-deep into the moon-smudged water,
adjusting the lantern, unravelling the net,
peering into ripples and swirls. Mushroom-net flying in the air,
slapping the face of the water on its return.

Take a look at this! He thrusts his hand towards my face suddenly,
his fist crawling with prawns; his first catch
within the first hour past midnight. Bending down,
I inhale a lungful of the crustaceans’ last dying salty breath.

The lantern’s light now dances on his face feverishly
and then, I see him face to face … yes, face to face!
his eyes – glassy and lidless – unblinking.
In the month of May, prawns die in thousands Sir, you know!

His murmuring voice fades as the wind begins to howl.
Tomorrow, let’s have supper, you and I, just beyond the marsh;
but don’t forget to bring a pickaxe, shovel and a hoe.
we have a lot of digging to do!

Then, suddenly I lose him to a freak swirl, corkscrewing,
dragging him down … down … down to the bottom
the bridge turns into quick sand, roots grow out of my feet,
and the moon sheds a drop of blood!

Friday Forum Calls For Domestic Reforms, Says International Community Goodwill Alone Will Not Help Economy


Colombo Telegraph
May 27, 2016 
The Friday Forum has underscored that no amount of goodwill on the part of the international community will help Sri Lanka’s economy without discipline and the domestic will to reform.
The Forum, comprising of a group dedicated to democracy, good governance, human rights and rule of law said that it recognizes the extremely difficult economic policy choices that our society and government have to make in the present circumstances.
Economic forum“These circumstances include total expenditure in excess of incomes earned in the economy requiring borrowing abroad year after year; a continued failure to raise government revenue adequate to meet government expenditure; a rampant rise in government expenditure pushed by competitive populist measures espoused by the main political parties at elections; the consequent recourse by government to debt financing, borrowing in both domestic and foreign markets to pay for rising expenditure and servicing accumulated debt of government absorbing a large and rising proportion of government receipts; and denying resources to undertake both rising current expenditure and to continue with current investment projects, leave aside new investments. The rupee cost of servicing foreign debt rises with the devaluation of the rupee and worsens domestic public finance problems,” the Forum said in a statement released on Thursday.
The international economic conditions now and in the near years not holding prospects of rapid growth in the principal economies of the world as in the previous decade or so, to enable the Sri Lanka economy to grow faster pulled by export demand. “It is probable that interest rates in world capital markets may rise after several years of very cheap money and that rise will make refinancing of government foreign debt far more expensive. Remittances from earnings overseas by Sri Lanka nationals did not rise in 2015 and that may worsen the problem in the balance of international payments.
Slow growth in the economy enforced by these circumstances will reduce the increase in living standards and cut own growth in employment opportunities. It is imperative that whatever mix of policies is chosen, that mix includes measures to minimize adverse effects on those least able to bear them. To make an understatement, these are unpleasant situations for any government to handle,” the statement said.
According to the Friday Forum, Sri Lanka has a small number of options to choose from, which are however not easy to implement. “The temporarily pleasant choice is to go on regardless and finance increased government expenditure by printing money and extending credit to the private sector on easy terms to expand private expenditure in the hope of growing out of economic difficulties. It is as temporarily pleasant as it is in the longer run impracticable. Boosting domestic demand in that manner will soon create a crisis in international payments, raise domestic prices rapidly, depreciate the rupee against all currencies and lead to other nasty consequences, which have the potential to destabilize society, both economically and politically,” the statement signed by Dr. G. Usvatte- Aratchi and Prof. Savitri Goonesekera said.
The other choices are likely to cause hardship in the short term but may bring back stability to the economy and given wise policies to a long term growth path. Hardship will come because easing the severity of current crises in the economy will require restraining the growth of total domestic demand bringing down rates of growth, with little expansion in export demand. “Government will need to review seriously incentive structures and institute fundamental reforms in government finance and administration,” the statement said.
The Forum noted that the Central Bank has the responsibility to bring the financial system to sound health. The severity of hardships can be mitigated, but by no means eliminated, with the help of the international community whose good will to the people of Sri Lanka has been high since January 2015. “However, no amount of goodwill on the part of the international community will help the economy without discipline and the domestic will to reform,” the group said.
“Further there is the possibility of direct controls on imports and capital movements. We are all too familiar with the consequences of these controls from experience in the 1970s. Discretion to allocate resources in the hands of politicians and bureaucrats will corrupt whatever is left of a working government machinery. In so doing we also would infringe international agreements which we had entered into. All assistance from intergovernmental financial institutes will come under serious questioning. Private net capital inflows would most likely dwindle at best to a trickle,” the statement said.