Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, May 28, 2016

Double Taxation Whammy From Good Governance Government


Colombo TelegraphBy Chirantha Amerasinghe –May 28, 2016
Chirantha Amerasinghe
Chirantha Amerasinghe
In a world that is signing economic agreements against double taxation and the very thought of it is a human rights violation; here we are again shamefully saying that the citizens of Sri Lanka are subjected to a double taxation. We have to accept that any government requires a healthy tax policy to maintain a stable economy, so one cannot say people should not be taxed. However any policy should be healthy and should not harass the people, if it does it would be the demise of any government as history recalls. Lord Buddha said that “Authorities must take taxes in the matter of which a Bee takes pollen from a flower without harming it”. Coincidentally, my great great grandfathers brother, Veerapuranappu who is a national hero, stood up against such taxes and led rebellion against the English government as Viscount Torrington the then Governor of Sri Lanka imposed excessive taxes and burdened the people.
mobile protest  8From the 2nd of May 2016 the taxes on telecommunication services were double taxed by VAT and NBT. As a result the tax on telephone charges which was at 27.55% rose to 49.73% which is an increase of 80%. Also the tax on internet charges which was at 12.24% rose to 31.77% thus an increase of 159%. Currently the effective rate of VAT on the above taxes is 19.53% which is 4.53% higher than what is said in parliament due to a effective rate policy. This cannot be a policy of “Good Governance” either.
The background story lies behind the reintroduction of the VAT and NBT to the Telecommunications Sector through the budget which took effect from 2nd of May. The current government accused the former government of removing VAT and NBT from the Telecommunications Sector to make a political gain in a Parliament full of old and out dated people who cannot even listen or remember these actions and are not even bothered to do so. In reality the former government did not remove VAT and NBT from Telecommunication Services but rather combined the two into the Telecommunications Levy which today stands at 26.04%.

Robber-judge Thilina Gamage the most wanted Elephant rogue tramples the laws and flees! -Wherever you see him apprehend and hand over to CID !

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -27.May.2017, 11.45PM) The robber judge  Thilina Vincent Sulochana Gamage alias Thilina Gamage the Elephant rogue who despite being  the Colombo chief magistrate has kicked the laws aside and fled from his home . He is now in hiding based on reports reaching LeN inside information division.
This elephant rogue judge was issued an order by the court to visit the CID on 25th morning and make a statement in connection with the robbery of the Elephant . The CID too summoned him on that day. By then , on the 20 th he was sent on compulsory leave by the Judicial Service Comission (JSC)
Thilina without appearing at the CID on the 25 h has left his residence on the 24 th night and gone into hiding . His whereabouts are unknown. On the 24 th night several of his friends had visited his home in vehicles to meet him , but Thilina in a vehicle of one of them without the notice of others has fled away. 
He has nursing the belief that he would be arrested by the CID on the 25 th , fled away. As a government officer conducting himself in this manner ignoring a court order is an offence that renders him liable to losing his magisterial post.
Thilina Gamage the rogue, if and when he is  arrested under the Public property Act , shall be produced before the Gangodawila magistrate court  based on his area of residence .The chief judge there is Kanishka Wijeratne before whom Thilina must be produced is a bosom pal of Thilina.
On the 25 th a  conference on intellectual property was held at the Judiciary Institute . Kanishka Wijeratne who attended the conference  had openly stated what  action should be taken in relation to Thilina. Anyone arrested under the intellectual property Act is not eligible for bail , and therefore has to be remanded. However , under special circumstances , bail can be considered , Kanishka had explained. He had publicly elaborated that like how the Elephant rogue Uduwe Dhammaloka Thera got bail citing the grounds that he had to attend the funeral of Ven. Asgiriya Mahanayake , Thilina too could ask for bail.
The spokespersons for the magistrates’ association told Lanka e News , based on these announcements alone of Kanishka the bosom pal of Thilina the Elephant rogue , after the arrest of Thilina , his bosom pal Kanishka should stay out of the case . If the right procedure is followed Kanishka himself should volunteer to stay clear of the case. In any case ,apparently , Kanishka does not have that ethical background , the spokespersons lamented.
Meanwhile , according to reports reaching LeN inside information division yesterday night (26) , the Elephant rogue Thilina who had brazenly and blatantly acted in violation of the laws and has fled , is being  kept hidden  with the knowledge , support and protection of  an infamous  co ordinating secretary of the president . By the way this co ordinating secretary is  a lawyer who has the rare inglorious distinction of having not spoken in any legal case or having won any.
Though  he is an ex NGO pillar he is better known as a culprit who  robs his own NGO. He is a most opportunistic politician with a most  putrid antecedence .He is always behind rogues and scoundrels not to apprehend them but to encourage them in their crimes. It is little wonder he was responsible to get bail for the Elephant rogue Uduwe Dhammaloka Thera . Lanka e news which unwaveringly espouses the cause of truth and unhesitatingly exposes such  scoundrels and rascals is keeping  a watch over this wolf  in human clothing who is a pest  to decent and lawful society.

Lanka e news hereby urges all law abiding pro good governance citizens  to apprehend the robber-judge  Thilina Gamage the most wanted Elephant rogue wherever they see him  , who is evading  arrest and most wanted !

---------------------------
by     (2016-05-27 23:44:54)

Undemocratic practices, most unwelcome

Undemocratic practices, most unwelcomeMay 28, 2016
Number of things happened that make one uneasy and uncomfortable. Is bureaucracy and state officials are invading the domain of representative democracy. We hear that Prime Minister has protested that his rights as an MP have been violated by sending a notice to appear before the Supreme Court. MP Weerawansa was to be noticed within the parliament premises by some ignorant official; but the Speaker has chased away the official. 

Most famous incident arose when the officials of Minister Mustapha organized an event very relevant to the provincial council, without inviting the Eastern Province Chief Minister Nasser Ahamed. On the other hand The Government Medical Officers' Association (GMOA) decided to go on strike next Tuesday in all government hospitals in the country except in disaster-hit districts, against the ‘arbitrary action’ of the Medical Services Director (MSD) of the Health Ministry. Of course all these events are very different and spread out among many subjects; but all events are caused by officials who have ignored the correct procedure and were looking for simple way out with least amount of intellectual commitment.
 
EP Chief Minister gave the background to the incident that occurred at the function held at the Sampur Maha Vidyalaya. He said he had lost his temper because of the actions of Governor Austin Fernando. Speaking to media, he said the governor had shown a lack of  respect for him, frequently undermining his authority in the province and interfering in his work. On the other hand CM Commenting on the incident at the function said that he, the Chief Minister, had not been acknowledged officially by the compère. 
 
“However, when I tried to get on the stage after the governor called me, the compère tried to stop me. Then I lost my temper.” If the governor had requested him to come to the stage then Oswin has done his duty and the mistake has been done by others who organized the meeting. If the organizers knew that Nazeer Ahamed is the chief minister and that as the leading citizen in the province, should be allowed on stage, this wouldn’t have happened. 
 
The bureaucrats who are responsible for this mistake clearly do not know the significance of devolution and national integration. Did officials of Minister Mustapha have failed to recognize the importance of devolution, self rule in the eastern province? This is entirely against the principles of good governance.
 
The mistake of the Chief Minister is the way he displayed his protest. Of course he had the right to protest and explain the violation of democratic principle of devolution and autonomy.  “This shows how the Chief Minister is treated. The post should be respected. After all, he is the head of the province,” he said.  Ok, fine, but he did not say that in the stage; instead we only saw the shouting and pushing around. Certainly that is not the best way to achieve reconciliation.
 
In the case of Doctors, number of GMOA branches island-wide had objected to the Medical Services Director’s arbitrary actions, warning of strike action. It is against the principles of social capitalism promised by Ranil Wickremesinghe. The original list had been replaced with a new list prepared by the MSD and a Public Relations Officer of the Health Ministry. 
 
According to the new list some of the peripheral hospitals would not get doctors at all,” the GMOA Spokesman Dr. De Soysa said. “We prepared the list according to the information received from hospital directors and regional health service directors at a meeting of the heads of health institutions. Now, it has been changed without our consent,” he said. This sounds extremely bureaucratic and undemocratic; and this appears almost a deliberate attempt to create a clash between GMOA and the Liberal regime.

Corrupt state officials' front to protect the corrupt

FRIDAY, 27 MAY 2016 
A state officials' front to protect the corrupt has been formed with the manipulation of the joint opposition  and they have been pressurizing President Maithripala Sirisena stating they would resign from their posts in director boards if investigations regarding their corrupt dealings are continued by the FCID reveal websites.
These sources report that 6 officials including former director board of Tourism Development Authority were to be arrested yesterday (26th) after getting instructions from the Attorney General but the move had to be abandoned as the President, due to threats from the corrupt officials' mafia, had ordered the police before he left to Japan not to arrest them.
According to information revealed 139 officials out of several lakhs of state officials have joined this organization.
The sources state that the organization is managed by corrupt officials of the previous government including Gamini Senarath, Anusha Palpita and M. Darmawardene and the organization receives support from corrupt officials in Sri Lanka Administrative Services' Association.  It is also reported that senior officials of the Ministry of Public  Administration support the organization.
Source: ColomboXnews
Wounded Palestinian shot dead by Israeli soldier mourned in Hebron

Family rejects restrictions placed on funeral by Israeli authorities, leads massive street procession 


Palestinian mourners bear the body of Abdel Fattah al-Sharif through the streets of Hebron on Saturday (MEE/Anas Abu Rmeilah) 

Elia Ghorbiah-Saturday 28 May 2016

HEBRON, West Bank - Hundreds of mourners on Saturday attended the funeral of Abdel Fattah al-Sharif, who was shot dead by an Israeli soldier while lying wounded on the ground, a slaying captured by the Israeli rights group B’Tselem on a video that sparked international outrage.

Israeli authorities on Friday evening transferred the body of Sharif, 21, to Hebron’s Al-Ahli Hospital after holding it for more than two months.

Sharif’s family rejected restrictions placed on the funeral by Israeli authorities before release of the body, and led a massive procession from the hospital to Sharif’s house and on to the Hebron Martyrs Cemetery.

“We refused Israeli instructions to hold the funeral at night with only a few people in attendance. Our son deserves to be buried properly, and we have a right to say our last goodbyes,” Sharif’s father Yusri said.
The Israeli soldier who killed Sharif, Sergeant Elor Azaria, has been released from custody, though he faces a charge of manslaughter, which was downgraded from murder.

During the funeral, Sharif’s father and relatives said the trial was an attempt by the Israeli army to "mislead international public opinion" after the release of the video caught the attention of many right groups and institutions.

Judicial medical report

The director of the Medico-Legal Institute at An-Najah University, Ryan Ali, took part in the autopsy of Sharif and completed a judicial medical report describing the slaying in detail.
Ali told MEE that Sharif was shot with a number of bullets, some of which focused on lower limbs as well as the top side of the chest, adding that one bullet had penetrated the chest cavity and led to the right lung rupturing and causing internal bleeding in the chest cavity.
However, the doctor said those injuries were superficial and did not lead to death directly, because the amount of blood collected in the right chest cavity did not exceed half a liter and was not sufficient to cause death.
The fatal shot was the last one, which penetrated the skull from the top of the right side and led to a complete laceration of the wall and the disintegration of the bones of the skull, the doctor said.
Ali said the results illustrated in the nine-page report constituted a complete dossier for a condemnation of Israel, evidence to be taken by the Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and others responsible before an international court.
Funeral procession led from hospital to Sharif’s house and on to Hebron Martyrs Cemetery (MEE/Anas Abu Rmeilah)
Funeral procession led from hospital to Sharif’s house and on to Hebron Martyrs Cemetery (MEE/Anas Abu Rmeilah)

The Palestinian ministry had previously said that it would take the completed file on the execution of Sharif before the International Criminal Court in the Hague

It also said that Sharif’s autopsy results “apply to all cases of field executions against Palestinians, and the occupation authorities working to cover and obscure evidence against soldier murderers.”

‘Clearly an execution’

The governor of Hebron, Kamel Hmaid, noted that Sharif’s funeral was held “in conjunction with the release of the accused soldier.” He said the slaying was “clearly an execution, with unequivocal evidence”, and urged all concerned authorities to put a stop to such slayings.

Hmaid said Palestinian authorities would pursue the legal proceedings to completion to produce the required file for the international court, in cooperation with the family of Sharif and the ministry.

Mohammed Abu Allan, an activist and observer of Israeli affairs, said: “The occupation wasn’t successful in concealing the crime of Sharif’s execution, so it is trying to promote the idea that the crime was a single event of a soldier who acted alone.”

He said regardless of whether the soldier had been instructed to shoot at that moment or not, “such actions are based in the Israeli army’s occupation and are not exceptional. Over the past eight months, the occupation has killed a number of Palestinians who weren’t implementing any stabbings”.

Sharif was shot alongside Ramzi Aziz al-Qasrawi on 24 March, after the two allegedly stabbed and moderately wounded an Israeli soldier.

Qasrawi was killed immediately, while al-Sharif was left lying on the ground wounded for several minutes, before the Israeli soldier stepped forward and shot him directly in the head.

Israelis’ heartwarming response to shocking police brutality

The brutal police beating of a young Bedouin man outside his Tel Aviv workplace, where he was working to save money for university tuition, leads hundreds of Israelis to pitch in and pay his tuition. (Update: the crowdfunding campaign has reached 200 percent of its original goal.)


By Michal Rotem-May 25, 2016


Mayasem Abu Alqian, a 19-year-old Bedouin citizen from the southern town of Hura, was attacked on Sunday by a group of Israeli Border Police officers near Rabin Square in the middle of Tel Aviv. Two plainclothes policemen approached Abu Alqian on the street outside his work, demanding that he produce an ID. Abu Alqian, not willing to identify himself to just anyone, demanded a uniformed police officer.

Within a matter of seconds, more policemen arrived at the scene and, according to eyewitnesses, started brutally attacking him. Abu Alqian was arrested and taken to the police station. Only hours later he was brought to a hospital for medical treatment (he is seriously bruised on his head and neck and suffered damage to his cornea). Following an appeal to the district court, he was released to house arrest in the middle of the night.

Abu Alqian moved to Tel Aviv a couple of months ago from the southern Bedouin town of Hura in order to save some money before starting to study psychology later this year. He was working two jobs, at Burger King and in a supermarket, approximately 20 hours a day, he says. The attack by the police officers threw a wrench in that plan — he says he no longer wants to return to Tel Aviv — and that is exactly where a wildly successful crowdfunding campaign stepped in.

Tuesday morning, the Negev Coexistence Forum (where I work) launched a crowdfunding campaign for Abu Alqian. The goal was to raise NIS 40,000 (just over $10,000) to fund his psychology studies. That bar was met within less than 12 hours, as hundreds of Israelis donated to support Abu Alqian.

Mayasem Abu Alqian at his home in Hura, May 25, 2017. (Michal Rotem)
Mayasem Abu Alqian at his home in Hura, May 25, 2017. (Michal Rotem)

Overwhelmed by the success, the NCF decided to try and double the goal, in order to raise some funds to cover Abu Alqian’s legal defense costs. By the time of writing, over 200 percent of the original goal’s sum had already been raised.

While the struggle against police violence in Israel is only in its infancy , this tiny project served as proof for many Arabs and Jews that there is hope out there. It gave Israelis a way to directly support a victim of police brutality, in a very constructive way.

Among the comments made by supporters, people wrote “I would be happy to show Mayasem that there are different people, people who seek peace”; “Mayasem, good luck with your studies”; “Thank you for the opportunity to support Mayasem”; “I am so ashamed, hope we will be able to fix this”. More than 800 Israelis already supported the project.

While the Israeli public seems to still be shocked by Sunday’s events, according to some reports by Israeli media, the Department of Internal Police Investigations had already finished its inquiry and is about to close the case against the alleged attackers. While Mayasem was still on house arrest until Thursday and banned from Tel Aviv for another week, all the involved policemen are free.

Abu Alqian went on the radio Wednesday and thanked all his supporters, stating that it gave him a bit of relief and that he was overwhelmed by the warm embrace he received from so many people. And still, he says he has no intentions to ever come back to Tel Aviv.

Michal Rotem, based in Be’er Sheva, works for the Negev Coexistence Forum for Civil Equality and is a Hebrew-language blogger on Local Call.

Ireland latest EU state to defend BDS

A Palestine solidarity contingent takes part in the Reclaim the Vision of 1916 march in Dublin, on 24 April, marking 100 years since Ireland’s Easter Rising. (via Facebook)

Kevin Squires-28 May 2016

In another blow to the Israeli campaign to criminalize Palestine solidarity activism, the Irish government has affirmed that the global boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement represents a “legitimate” means of protest “intended to pressure Israel into ending the occupation.”

In the Irish parliament on Thursday, foreign minister Charles Flanagan stated that “while the government does not itself support such a policy,” the BDS movement holds a “legitimate political viewpoint” and that the government does “not agree with attempts to demonize those who advocate this policy.”

Second blow in a week

This is the second major setback Israel has suffered this week to its campaign to delegitimize and criminalize the global movement within the European Union and other Western states.

Ireland is the third EU government to make such a statement in recent months.

Earlier this week, Dutch foreign minister Bert Koenders said that “statements or meetings concerning BDS are protected by freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, as enshrined in the Dutch constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights.”

In March, the Swedish foreign ministry stated that BDS “is a civil society movement. Governments should not interfere in civil society organization views.”

At Israel’s urging, governments in the US, UK, France, Canada and elsewhere are attempting to introduce anti-democratic legislation, and taking other repressive measures to undermine the BDS movement.

Israel has also said that it is using its intelligence services to spy on BDS activists around the world.
Gilad Erdan, the Israeli cabinet minister charged with combating the global movement, described BDS activists as threats, saying they must “pay the price” for their campaign work.

“With the Netherlands and Ireland joining Sweden in defending the right to advocate and campaign for Palestinian rights under international law through BDS, Israel’s attempt to get BDS outlawed in Europe and to bully its supporters into silence have been dealt a serious blow,” said Riya Hassan, Europe coordinator for the Palestinian BDS National Committee.

“Israel’s attacks on our movement appear to be backfiring as they have led to European governments and some of the world’s most famous human rights organizations and political organizations across Europe and the world speaking out in defense of our right to advocate BDS,” Hassan added.

“Across European civil society, there is a fast spreading recognition of the BDS movement as a legitimate form of nonviolent, grassroots human rights advocacy for the UN-stipulated rights of the Palestinian people,” Hassan said.

Ireland “deeply concerned” about Omar Barghouti

The Irish foreign minister’s comments came in the context of a parliamentary debate concerning Palestinian human rights defender and co-founder of the BDS movement Omar Barghouti, who is facing politically motivated repression by Israel.

Israel is refusing to renew the travel document of Barghouti, a Palestinian born in the diaspora married to a Palestinian citizen of Israel, preventing him from pursuing his campaign work internationally. He has been told that his permanent residency status is being reviewed.

The human rights groups Amnesty InternationalHuman Rights Watch and Front Line Defenders have all made statements concerning Barghouti’s liberty and safety, with Amnesty and Front Line Defenders designating him a human rights defender.

Responding to a question from the Anti-Austerity Alliance member of parliament Mick Barry, the foreign minister said that “the EU delegation in Israel has asked for clarification of [Barghouti’s] position and we will follow all developments in the case.”

Flanagan added that the government was “deeply concerned about wider [Israeli] attempts to pressure [nongovernmental organizations] and human rights defenders through legislation and other means to hinder their important work. We have raised this both at EU level and directly with the Israeli authorities.”

The minister also promised that the Irish government “will monitor the ongoing developments in this case in conjunction with the EU delegation and as part of our broader engagement in support of the role of human rights defenders and the protection of civil society space.”

Flagging friend of Israel

The Irish government’s position will perhaps be especially galling for Israeli officials as Flanagan is considered to be very friendly towards Israel, having formerly been a member of the small Friends of Israel grouping in the Oireachtas, the Irish parliament.

Before becoming foreign minister in July 2014, as chair of the governing right-wing Fine Gael party, Flanagan was a vocal opponent of the BDS movement.

In 2013 he publicly criticized the Teachers’ Union of Ireland for its adoption of a motion to support the academic boycott of Israel.

In 2012, Flanagan lambasted Trocaire, the overseas development agency of the Catholic Church in Ireland, when it began a campaign asking the Irish government to ban products from Israel’s settlements in the occupied West Bank, which are illegal under international law, calling the move a “very partisan political campaign that is beyond their remit.”

In a 2013 interview with pro-Israel columnist Carol Hunt, Flanagan made clear his belief that “Israel has been demonized by an Irish media slavishly dancing to the Palestinian drumbeat for decades.”

“Israel has a far better and more progressive record on human rights than any of its neighbors,” Flanagan claimed. “The truth must be told.”

But now it would appear that even for certain officials and governments with sympathies towards Israel, including Flanagan, the latest attacks on the civil society BDS campaign are proving either too anti-democratic or too embarrassing to defend.

Notably, in the Irish general election earlier this year, Israel lost three of its most vocal parliamentary friends;disgraced former minister for justice and defense Alan Shatter of Fine Gael and Joanna Tuffy of the Labour Party lost their seats, while former education minister Ruairi Quinn, also of Labour, did not contest the election.

Tuffy was vice-chair of the small Oireachtas Friends of Israel group.

Meanwhile, a pre-election campaign initiated by the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign saw around 40 candidates who were ultimately elected to Ireland’s 158-seat parliament sign pledges opposing the Irish arms trade with Israel and supporting the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement due to Israel’s human rights violations.

Israeli funding booted from literary festival

This wasn’t the only bad news for Israel’s propaganda, or hasbara, efforts in Ireland this week.
On Tuesday, the Listowel Writers’ Week Festival announced it would be refusing funding from the Israeli embassy in Ireland to bring an Israeli writer to the festival.

The issue came to light on Sunday when members of Ireland’s artistic community began highlighting on social media that the festival’s brochure listed an event in which the Israeli embassy was explicitly thanked for its support.

After having been contacted by concerned individuals, including many artists, the organizers announced that the fesitval would honor its commitment to host the Israeli writer Savyon Liebrecht, but was rejecting the Israeli embassy funding.

This move is in line with cultural boycott guidelines issued by PACBI, the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, which call for a boycott of Israeli institutions, not individuals.
“As a Palestinian woman who is exiled from her homeland, I thank the festival for refusing to take Israeli state funding for this event,” IPSC chair Fatin Al Tamimi said, “This decision is courageous, principled and absolutely the right thing to do. This is a small, but certainly significant, positive gesture that will be appreciated by the Palestinian people struggling for freedom, justice and equality, whether under Israel’s apartheid regime or living in exile.”

Kevin Squires is a journalist and national coordinator of the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

 Throughout the fiasco of the Pentagon’s $500 million effort to train and equip a force of Syrian rebels to take on the Islamic State, one small group endured.

The New Syrian Army completed the U.S. training course in Jordan, infiltrated into Syria and then, in March, without fanfare or publicity, seized a pinprick of territory from the militants at the remote Tanaf border crossing with Iraq in the far southeast corner of the Syrian province of Homs.

There they have remained, holding their ground without deserting, defecting or getting kidnapped, unlike many of the other similarly trained rebels whose mishaps prompted the temporary suspension of the program last year.

Even this modest success is now in jeopardy, however, following an Islamic State suicide attack this month. An armored vehicle barreled into the rebels’ base shortly before dawn on May 7, killing a number of them, said Lt. Col. Mohammed Tallaa, a Syrian officer who defected and is the group’s commander.


Tallaa would not say on the record the precise number of casualties — and the number of rebels at the base — for fear of further endangering the rebels who are left. But he said the attack came as a heavy blow to a force that was already small and suffering from a lack of weaponry and equipment that he said had been promised but not delivered.

Those who survived are now questioning whether they want to remain at all in their sparsely defended desert outpost to await further attacks, Tallaa said in an interview near the southern Turkish town of Reyhanli.
“I’m not saying the Americans let us down, but there is dereliction of duty. They are not doing what they could,” he said. “We don’t want the Americans to disrespect the lives of our men.”

A U.S. military spokesman said warplanes responded to a plea for help when the base was bombed, but did not arrive in time because the attack happened so fast. A number of airstrikes have since been carried out against Islamic State positions in the area and new supplies of weaponry have been delivered, said Col. Steve Warren, the spokesman. He said the U.S. military believes the group will survive.

“They still have Tanaf, they have been resupplied, and we think they can hold,” he said. “We think they have enough firepower, and we are providing support with airstrikes as available.”

The suicide bombing has further exposed, however, the shortcomings and mistakes that have bedeviled from the outset the U.S. endeavor to build a force of Syrians capable of taking on the Islamic State. The $500 million Pentagon program conceived by President Obama two years ago got off to a slow start, with the training beginning only last spring. Months later it was suspended, after the first group of trainees was kidnapped by Jabhat al-Nusra and the second defected, handing over some of their weapons to the al-Qaeda affiliate in the process.
In March, the training was restored, with the less ambitious goal of working with existing rebel groups in northern Syria’s Aleppo province. Those groups are now battling for their survival against Islamic State fighters advancing in the area around the town of Azaz near the border with Turkey.

In the meantime, however, the Pentagon has forged ahead with a different alliance, with the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG), which is seen as a rival or worse by many Arab rebel groups. The YPG is responsible for almost all of the territorial gains made so faragainst the Islamic State in Syria, and its close coordination with the U.S. military is a source of deep resentment among other Syrian rebels. An effort to rebrand the YPG as a coalition with Arab rebels called the Syrian Democratic Forces has brought only a small number of Arabs into the force so far.

As the United States accelerates plans to advance deeper into the Islamic State’s Arab strongholds, including a U.S.-backed push by a mostly Kurdish force toward the Islamic State’s self-proclaimed capital of Raqqa, the need for an Arab force that can win the loyalties of those who are living under militant control is growing more urgent, said Bassam Barabandi, a Syrian diplomat from the Deir al-Zour area who defected and lives in Washington.

“This is not a Kurdish fight, it’s an Arab fight — and most of the Arab Sunnis want to be part of this fight,” he said. “The only vehicle that exists is the New Syrian Army, and I have heard from many people that they want to be part of this army.”

The New Syrian Army has the potential to win support, he said, because its members are drawn from the nearby province of Deir al-Zour, which borders Iraq and contains most of Syria’s oil. Most recruits are from the remnants of a Free Syrian Army unit called the Authenticity and Development Front, which already was known in the province before it was defeated by the Islamic State during its sweep through Syria and Iraq in 2014.

“At the moment, the New Syrian Army is very small, but it would be very easy to empower it and create numbers,” Barabandi said.

Recruitment has all along proved the program’s biggest challenge, however. A requirement that applicants sign a document pledging to fight only the Islamic State and not the government of President Bashar al-Assad deterred many from signing up at all. Others who showed up for the training in Jordan were put off by a lengthy wait that sometimes lasted months as U.S. officials delved into the background of every rebel who applied. Many gave up and went back to Syria before they had been approved, said a former U.S. official familiar with the train-and-equip effort, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to be frank.

“We deserve a lot of criticism on this program,” he said. “One problem was that the vetting took way too long and the other was to force these people to commit themselves to fighting Daesh.” (Daesh is an Arabic acronym for the Islamic State.)

Meanwhile, the New Syrian Army has been left feeling abandoned and vulnerable in its isolated base, in a remote and forbidding area of empty desert miles from any major towns. It has carried out a number of operations against the Islamic State, always with U.S. support, U.S. officials and rebels say. But it never received the weapons and equipment it had hoped for, the rebels assert.

It was always assumed that more rebels would be joining it, but the suspension of the program meant that none did. The original group of 50 trained by the U.S. military did later increase their numbers by recruiting and training extra fighters themselves, but the force remained far smaller than had been anticipated.

Antitank weapons, which have been used by Kurdish and Iraqi forces elsewhere with spectacular success to blow up Islamic State suicide bombs before they reach their target, also were not available when the bomber struck. The former U.S. official said the intent had always been to provide those trained under the program with antitank weapons, but Tallaa and another commander with the group said they did not materialize. Nor did equipment such as bulldozers that might have been used to build better fortifications, he said.

New Syrian Army fighters saw the suicide bomber hurtling through the desert toward them when the vehicle was two miles away, Tallaa said. They opened fire with everything they possessed, but the bullets, mortar rounds

and rocket-propelled grenades bounced harmlessly off the ­Russian-made armored vehicle, which had been reinforced with extra plates. Though they called for airstrikes, planes arrived only after the car bomb hit the base.

“If the program continues like this, there will never be an army big enough to fight ISIS,” Tallaa said. “And more than that, we will lose the guys we already have.”

The U.S. military also failed during the recruitment effort to understand some of the dynamics of the Syrian rebel movement, making poor choices when it selected commanders for the units being trained, said Barabandi, who cited Tallaa as one of the problematic commanders.

But there is no question that the suicide bombing has badly shaken faith in the U.S. commitment to supporting the force, he said. “This generated a lot of mistrust,” he said.

Zakaria Zakaria in Istanbul and Reyhanli contributed to this report.

Exclusive: White House Blocks Transfer of Cluster Bombs to Saudi Arabia

Riyadh’s air war in Yemen has killed and injured hundreds of civilians. Washington is finally trying to stem the carnage.

Exclusive: White House Blocks Transfer of Cluster Bombs to Saudi Arabia

BY JOHN HUDSON-MAY 27, 2016

Frustrated by a growing death toll, the White House has quietly placed a hold on the transfer of cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia as the Sunni ally continues its bloody war on Shiite rebels in Yemen, U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. It’s the first concrete step the United States has taken to demonstrate its unease with the Saudi bombing campaign that human rights activists say has killed and injured hundreds of Yemeni civilians, many of them children.

The move follows rising criticism by U.S. lawmakers of America’s support for the oil-rich monarchy in the year-long conflict. Washington has sold weapons and provided training, targeting information, and aerial refueling support to the Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen. It has also sold Riyadh millions of dollars’ worth of cluster bombs in recent years.

Asked about the hold on the shipments, a senior U.S. official cited reports that the Saudi-led coalition used cluster bombs “in areas in which civilians are alleged to have been present or in the vicinity.”


“We take such concerns seriously and are seeking additional information,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The hold applies to CBU-105 cluster bombs manufactured by the U.S.-based firm Textron Systems. According to Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, Saudi-led forces have dropped CBU-105 munitions in multiple locations around Yemen, including Al-Amar, Sanhan, Amran, and the Al-Hayma port.

Cluster bombs contain bomblets that scatter widely and kill or injure indiscriminately. Sometimes bomblets fail to detonate immediately and can kill civilians months or even years later. The weapons were banned in a 2008 international treaty that arms sales giants, including the United States and Russia, refused to sign.

Responding to humanitarian concerns, the United States has scaled back exports of cluster bombs and demanded changes in the munitions’ performance, such as banning those with a higher fraction of submunitions that do not explode on impact. A 2009 U.S. law prohibits exporting cluster bombs that have a failure rate of above 1 percent. It also says the weapons cannot be used “where civilians are known to be present” and only against “clearly defined military targets.”

The CBU-105 Sensor Fuzed Weapon has been touted for meeting the 1 percent requirement. But a February report by Human Rights Watch cited evidence the weapon was used in two attacks in Yemen, and had a failure rate that exceeded 1 percent. “The evidence raises serious questions about compliance with U.S. cluster munition policy and export rules,” said Steve Goose, arms director at Human Rights Watch.

The group has investigated at least five attacks in Yemen involving CBU-105s in four governorates since the war began. In December, the group documented an attack on the Yemeni port of Hodaida that injured a woman and two children in their homes. Two other civilians were wounded in a CBU-105 attack near Al-Amar village, according to local residents and medical staff interviewed by Human Rights Watch.

The Obama administration has issued several statements of “concern” about the violence in Yemen, but has yet to formally announce any reduction in military or tactical support for the coalition. A U.S. official touted the fact that Washington’s “engagement” with Riyadh has led to the kingdom’s commitment to an inquiry into civilian deaths in the conflict.

“Saudi Arabia has also pledged to create an investigations commission to evaluate military targeting, ensure the protection of civilians, and investigate incidents of civilian harm during the conflict in Yemen,” said the U.S. official. “This is a vital step towards protecting civilians, and also avoiding future civilian harm.”

While praising the decision to hold the sale of cluster bombs to Riyadh, prominent humanitarian groups told FP it’s not enough.

“Any step toward ending the production and sale of cluster bomb munitions by the United States government is a good thing, but much much more needs to be done,” said Sunjeev Bery, advocacy director at Amnesty International. He said his organization pushed — unsuccessfully — to block a $1.3 billion sale of smart bombs to Riyadh that the United States approved in November.

It remains unclear if the Obama administration’s hold will affect a tranche of cluster bombs poised for shipment to Saudi Arabia, or simply all future requests. The United States concluded a contract for the manufacture of 1,300 CBU-105 weapons to Saudi Arabia in 2013. The final shipment of such weapons can take years to complete, but U.S. officials have repeatedly refused to clarify if the order’s final tranche was delivered.

“Textron Systems does not comment on delivery dates with our customers,” said Matthew Colpitts, a spokesman for Textron Systems.

The Saudi Embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment.

Since March 2015, when Saudi Arabia launched its military campaign against the Houthi rebellion in Yemen, at least 6,200 people have died and nearly 3 million have been displaced from their homes. The conflict is often viewed as a proxy battle between Saudi Arabia, which backs the Yemeni government in exile, and Iran, which has provided some support to Houthi rebels, who are part of a Shiite sect. Although aid workers have stressed Yemen’s dire humanitarian situation, counterterrorism experts note the protracted fighting and chaos has allowed al Qaeda’s affiliate in the Arabian peninsula to strengthen its position in the country.

Though the conflict is in its second year, it is only beginning to be eyed skeptically by U.S. lawmakers.
A proposed defense spending bill approved by the Senate Armed Services Committee calls for creating a capital fund to expedite the supply of precision guided bombs for “partner and allied forces.”

Although the bill does not specify which allies lawmakers have in mind, human rights groups and at least one senator are concerned that the provision could be used to make it easier to deliver more sophisticated bombs to Saudi Arabia.

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) proposed an amendment Thursday to strip the language out of the defense bill on grounds the provision could enable Saudi Arabia to expand its air campaign despite the mounting civilian toll, his office said.

The senator was also concerned that the provision in the defense bill could make it easier for an administration to involve the United States “in other foreign entanglements with limited oversight,” Murphy spokesman Chris Harris told FP.

Murphy on Thursday also proposed another amendment, along with Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, to impose stricter conditions on future sales of bombs to Saudi Arabia. The proposal would require the U.S. president to certify that the Saudi government is demonstrating an effort to target terrorist groups, minimize harm to civilians, and enable the delivery of humanitarian assistance before Congress can consider selling or transferring air-to-ground munitions.

“Saudi Arabia is an important partner, but the United States needs to recognize when a friend’s actions are not in our national interest,” Murphy said in a statement.

“There’s no evidence that the Saudi campaign in Yemen, enabled by the United States, advances our interests or makes us any safer,” Murphy said. “In fact, the civil war in Yemen is prolonging human suffering and playing into the hands of the same terrorist groups that are working to attack Americans.”
The United Nations is trying to broker a peace deal between the internationally recognized Yemeni government and Houthi rebels.

On Thursday, after a series of delays and theatrics, U.N. special envoy for Yemen Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed said peace talks were back on track in the host city of Kuwait after being suspended last week.

Ahmed said both sides indicated willingness to hold talks to reach a resolution, though similar promises have been made in the past.

FP‘s chief national security correspondent Dan De Luce contributed to this report
Photo credit: Getty Images