Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, May 20, 2016

Following Lanka e news’ exposure Dialog changes its ‘Reeri yaka’ policy - turns human and humane !


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 20.May. 9.30PM) Following the Lanka e news exposure a day ago that the Dialog Co. was following a policy of Reeri yaka (mad devil) by  disconnecting the mobile phone lines of its customers at the most crucial time during the period the country was ravaged by natural disasters , and when communication system was most paramount , the Dialog Co. which opened its eyes to its egregious blunder  has raised the credit limit of its customers before disconnection  by Rs. 500.00, according to reports reaching Lanka e news.
We pinpointed , among those many who were facing abysmal and acute despair owing to  the tragedy that suddenly struck the country , a mere phone call may have been all that mattered to save a precious life . Hence we blamed  this cruel and wicked  action of Dialog Company  and criticized its ruthless Reeri yaka attitude. A majority of the people expressed their views in support of our criticisms.
In any event we thank Dialog Co. for at least responding to our  report belatedly by making amends. After the Dialog Co. took action following the Lanka e news report , the Mobitel Co. too has raised the loan limit before disconnection of its customers.
Even in countries which are considered as dictatorial by many Sri Lankans , the phone service companies do not disconnect the lines of their customers because their  credit limit has been exceeded. Only the call originating facility is terminated. Even in such instances, the facility to take calls to ambulances , or emergency alias SOS numbers  are not withdrawn.
Truly speaking, it is unjustifiable to charge for calls received , as well as cutting off the receiving calls because the caller is paying for the call . Therefore  charging at both ends is unreasonable and it is only an unscrupulous inferior quality  businessman who will resort to that plunder. They are those using razors with both edges sharpened to slit the throats of the customers not once, but twice over !
 
---------------------------
by     (2016-05-20 15:55:12)

Money given against law for Mahinda’s Uganda tour!

Money given against law for Mahinda’s Uganda tour!
May 20, 2016
The Foreign Affairs Ministry has violated the law when it gave money for ex-president Mahinda Rajapaksa to tour Uganda, reports say.
The Sri Lankan state had paid for Mahinda’s airfare, food and accommodation during the trip. It is against the law for the ministry to give the money, as he had received the invitation for the tour unofficially.
The state can bear expenses of a former president’s foreign visit, but the official invitation for such a tour should come from the respective diplomatic mission to the Foreign Affairs Ministry, which is not the case in this instance.
The ministry had given Mahinda an Emirates Airline ticket costing Rs. 425,000 through invoice no.73835 on May 05. The ticket was bought from World Air (Pvt.) Ltd. at no. 62, Havelock Road, Colombo 05.
The Foreign Affairs Ministry hastened to pay for a private tour by an ex-president, whereas neither the country’s president, prime minister nor the foreign affairs minister had been invited.
Mahinda’s personal aide Udith Lokubandara on May 05 requested in writing from ministry secretary Chitranganie Wagiswara to meet the expenses for the tour. On the same day, the ministry gave money to buy the air ticket.
Not receiving an official invitation through the diplomatic mission of that country is an affront. Such a matter could even result in the diplomatic mission being withdrawn from that country.
According to information received by us, not even ex-president Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga had received funding for foreign tours from the Foreign Affairs Ministry during the Rajapaksa regime.
A former top official of the ministry told us that a proper investigation was called for by the Yahapaalana government that works to eliminate corruption, into the ministry have acted outside the legal limits in this instance.

Pay For The Vices Of The Unwise


Colombo Telegraph
By Mahesh Senanayake –May 19, 2016
Mahesh Senanayake
Mahesh Senanayake
It is no exaggeration to say that the successive governments in the post independence era in Sri Lanka have contributed to the “debt plight” the islanders are made to bear with today. If one examines the statistics available at the Central bank and the ministry of Finance, that shall be proved beyond reasonable doubt .
Once called the pearl of the Indian ocean, the old Ceylon was an epitome of economic success for many other countries and specially for the countries in the Asian region with self-sustenance in many ways and in many trades. Today, it is sad and worrisome to mention that the once self sustained country today has become an example for being “debt trapped” with no mercy towards its dwellers who have been mislead and misguided by not all but many successive leaders whom the dwellers appointed to guide and lead them and the nation.
A review of the total debt taken from 1950 to date and the pay capita debt repayment reveals startling facts of an economy which pushes its every citizen to pay Rs 25,000 as interest, in addition to bearing another Rs 40,000 for the repayment of the principal amounts of the loans, per annum.Ravi and Arjuna
In 1950 the total debt the country was liable for was Rs. 654 billions that only demanded Rs 86 from a Ceylonese to pay back the debts. In 53 years the total debt climbed up to Rs 2,139 billions in 2003 compelling every sri Lankan to bear Rs 111,563. In modern Sri Lanka which is bestowed with many white elephants, deal wheelers, a crooked public service and a confused society, every Sri Lankan has to pay Rs 425,000 to the cover the cost of loan repayment of a total debt of 8,503 billions.

CWE bandicoot and two accomplices finally enter the mouse trap: Five cases of fraud involving Rs. 40 million against former trade minister Johnston.!


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -20.May.2016, 9.00PM) As many as five criminal cases were filed by the Commission inquiring into allegations of bribery and corruption in the Colombo chief magistrate court yesterday (19) against Johnston Fernando alias Johnie the former minister of cooperatives and internal trade during the nefarious decade  of Mahinda Rajapakse who  is also by now known as a byword for lawlessness and corruption.
These cases have been filed on charges of deploying a large number of employees of the Co operative wholesale Establishment (CWE) during the period between 2010 and 2014 in his private political activities thereby precluding them from performing their legitimate duties as government servants , consequent upon which the government of Sri Lanka has incurred a loss of over Rs. 40.1 million !!
In addition , cases have also been filed against Johnie’s henchmen Eraj Tiriyantha Fernando the ex chairman of CWE as well as against Kaja Mohideen Mohomed Shakir who was its  working Director at that time  on charges of aiding and abetting in Johnie’s corrupt and criminal activities .
The case is to be heard on 5 th of June.
The case details are given hereunder ….
During the tenure of office of the first accused as minister , Johnston Xavier Fernando had misused the employees of the Establishment for his private purposes , while paying their salaries and allowances out of government funds which have been disbursed as follows :
Rs. 1,501, 703/43 disbursed to about 10 employees in the year 2010
Rs.6,007, 617/18 disbursed to about 27 employees in 2011.
Rs. 8,645,869/38 to about 31 employees in 2012
Rs. 11,077, 047/36 to about 39 employees in 2013
Rs. 12,888,818/36 to about 40 employees in 2014
Accordingly , the ex minister had engendered a huge loss of Rs. 40,121,055/71  to the government ! between 2011 and 2014 
The figures above show a steady escalation in corruption from year to year meaning that Johnie’s corruption had grown every year ,most surely and steadily . This was because Johnie harbored the confidence and conviction at that time when he was indulging in these colossal frauds that under the lawless and corrupt regime of the Rajapakses he could commit any fraud and any financial irregularities at public expense while enjoying impunity and be free from incrimination. 
The  Commission inquiring into allegations of bribery and corruption in its report to the court had charged the first accused Johnie under section 70 of its Act of having committed  corruption . The first accused is  indicted on charges of knowingly and wantonly  causing  the loss to the government by misusing State  resources to secure  illegal personal gains.
At the same time Eraj Thiriyantha Fernando and Kaja Mohideen Mohomed Shakir the second and third accused respectively , have been indicted on charges under section 70 of the Bribery and Corruption Act of troubling Manika Baduge Nilushi Nadeeka Sanjeewani  the chief of the financial division to release the payments every now and then, based on the report produced to court 
The second and third accused had also been charged additionally of committing an offence under section 102 and 113(b) of the penal   code of aiding and abetting the first accused johnie ; acting in collusion with a common intention ; and conspiring  to commit the offences .
---------------------------
by     (2016-05-20 15:34:51)

Yoshitha noticed – Grandma bailed out








FRIDAY, 20 MAY 2016

Mr. Yoshitha Rajapaksa has been noticed to appear in Mt. Lavinia Magistrates Court on the 26th by Mt. Lavinia Magistrate Mohammed Sahabdeen over a case filed under  the money laundering act on the purchase of a land in Mihindu Mawatha, Mt. Lavinia, for Rs 51.2 million.
Mr. Yoshitha Rajapaksa's grand mother Ms. J.C. Forest was arrested by the FCID today, brought before Mt. Lavinia Magistrates Court today (20th) and was released on personal bail of Rs. 1 million.
She was ordered to appear before FCID on the 24th.
Magistrate Thilina Gamage interdicted

2016-05-20
Judicial Service Commission has today interdicted Colombo Additional Magistrate Thilina Gamage after he was named a suspect by the Attorney General over the alleged possession of an elephant without a valid license, sources said. 

The Judicial Service Commission sources said it had informed the Additional Magistrate Gamage regarding his interdiction.

 Recently, the CID had informed Mr. Gamage to appear at the CID following the Attorney General’s instruction.

 However, he informed the CID in a letter, through his attorney, citing reasons for his inability to appear in the CID. (Shehan Chamika Silva)

Anura Senanayake goes to Gampaha to get charm done!

Anura Senanayake goes to Gampaha to get charm done!

May 20, 2016
Retired DIG Anura Senanayake who is now on the brink of being sent to remand custody and was due to report to the CID today (20) has sent a message to the police that he would be late to return to Colombo as he had gone outstation with several friends on an urgent matter.

In the last two days, he was thoroughly questioned by SP Shani Abeysekara and other officers and today, his personal bodyguards were summoned to the CID to verify what he has told them in the statement.
 
The CID also told him to report to the CID this afternoon.

Meanwhile, people of Veyangoda in Gampaha say Senanayake and several of his family members are taking part in a pooja at a well known Devale in the area. But, covering that up, he has told the CID that he would be late to return to Colombo as he has gone outstation on an urgent matter. However, CID officials are still waiting for his arrival, reports say. Once he reports to the CID, he is due to be produced before magistrate Nishantha Peiris tonight, reports add.

Pain of Nakba: Young Palestinians 'will never give up' dream of return


In Gaza, right to return to lands seized by Israel has become culture passed from elders to children through photos, stories and memories

Children in Gaza attend events to mark the Nakba, with a key symbolising Palestinian homes and land seized by Israel (Mohammed Asad/MEE)
Gazan youths gather near the border with Israel to protest (Mohammed Asad/MEE)

Mohammed Omer-Friday 20 May 2016

GAZA CITY- “Herbia was such beautiful farming land, overflowing with grapes, olives, sugar and citrus trees,” said 85-year-old Abu Fawzi to his grandchildren, Samar and Yazan, aged eight and nine.

The two children listened quietly to the spoken memories of their grandfather as the people of Gaza staged a mass rally commemorating the Nakba, or “catastrophe”, marking the 1948 mass expulsion of Palestinians from their ancestral lands amid the violence and turmoil of the creation of the state of Israel.

“Love your land, my grandchildren,” he said to them within the tent city which is now their refugee home, showing them original land documents dating from before 1948.

On the hottest day of the year so far, thousands had gathered to demand the right to return to their homes and lands, a right formally recognised by the United Nations

Those old enough to remember show the younger generation black and white photos of their ancestors’ homes and photos of relatives killed by Israeli troops, militias and gangs who were intent on expelling all non-Jews from Palestine.

Other photos show crops, orchards, water wells, livestock and the happy faces of people riding horses and camels enjoying freedom, dignity, education, and the right to work and earn.

Later they will march from the Unknown Soldier Square to the office of the United Nations in Gaza, chanting “We will return!”

Since 1948, Israel has forced millions of Palestinians into less and less space, with their mobility blocked and communities fragmented by fences and walls.

In that time, the number of Palestinians worldwide has also increased nine-fold to more than 12 million people at the end of 2015, according to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS).

Of those, an estimated 4.8m lived in the Palestinian territories, with 2.9m in the West Bank and 1.9m in the Gaza Strip. Refugees constitute about 43 percent of that population with 5.6m refugees registered with the UNRWA in 2015.

About 29 percent of Palestinians registered as refugees still live in camps, 10 of which are in Jordan, nine in Syria, 12 in Lebanon, 19 in the West Bank and eight in the Gaza Strip.

In these refugee camps, the “right of return” has become a culture passed from one generation to the next, with elders urging the children to hold tight to their right of return to family lands.

According to evidence collected by the PCBS, the Israelis seized control of 774 Palestinian towns and villages and destroyed 531 others during the Nakba. Up to 70 massacres in which more than 15,000 Palestinians were killed have also been documented.

Abu Fawzy continued to tell the story of how he was forced to flee, with his parents and siblings, from his house and farm in 1948.

One young man laughed. “You did not resist,” he said. But Abu Fawzy admitted they had no means of fighting.

“To fight with what? We were an unarmed state and the Jewish gangs had Britain behind them,” he explained, referring to how the UK, which had previously controlled Palestine had backed the creation of Israel.

While this year’s Nakba events have included the usual focus on lands lost and the right of return, they have also been used by some as an opportunity to call for Palestinian reconciliation and unified national strength.

“Sixty-eight years of the Nakba, and our people will never forget their homeland, Palestine,” Zakaria al-Agha, a senior Fatah leader, told crowds in Gaza City.

“We will return to it by using all methods, and the world shall know that we will never accept an alternative to our homeland,” he said, adding that no one had the right to give away Palestinian land.

But elsewhere in the city, factions had gathered to call for an end to Palestinian divisions, with the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority currently controlling the West Bank and Hamas dominant in Gaza.

Since intra-fighting in 2007, after Hamas won elections in Gaza, the two sides have gone through several rounds of talks without success.

“We were living with one Nakba, but now we have two,” said 21-year-old engineering student Nermeen Jarrar.

She explained that the Palestinian division had made people realise that the right of return could only be realised once Palestinians were hand in hand.

While Nakba rallies are organised by Palestinian communities around the world, in Gaza and the West Bank youths mark it by going to protest at the border fence with Israel.

But after the demonstrations the reality on the ground remains unchanged: camps remain impoverished and refugees continue to survive mainly on aid provided by UN agencies, while Palestinian land continues to be illegally occupied by Jewish settlers backed by Israel, which in turn enjoys the support and protection of the US.

“The refugee camps are getting more crowded - space is limited and we can only expand to the rooftops as Israel takes our land,” said Abu Mohammed Najjar, a 58-year-old from the Shati refugee camp, one of the poorest camps in Gaza. 

“Some of the houses here are limited to 50 or 60 metres. No-one can afford to buy land, and if you have land and money, there is never enough cement allowed in by Israel, to re-build homes,” he added.

When asked where he would live if he could choose anywhere in the world, he replied: “Then it must be Joura.”
Joura is the village his family were forced to leave when Israel was created in 1948.

“Joura is still alive in the minds and hearts of my children, and now my grandchildren,” he said, sitting in a narrow alleyway.

“We have lived on memories and dreams for 68 years - elders will die, but the youngsters will never forget or give up. That is their right, to return.”

Al-Qaeda's Ayman Al-Zawahri Plays Politics

Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al Zawahri has made it clear that Syria is now the center of the jihadist world.logo

Sam Heller-May 20, 2016

When the self-proclaimed Islamic State declared the establishment of a global Muslim “caliphate” in 2014, the move accelerated a race for legitimacy within the international jihadist movement. IS’s rival Al-Qaeda -- which had long held out a righteous Islamic state as a far-off ideal, not something that could be realized in June 2014 in the Syrian desert -- faced new pressure to deliver on jihadist aspirations and shore up its own credibility.

Yet, unlike IS, Al-Qaeda could not do it alone. IS has imposed jihadist unity at the point of a sword, crushing its militant rivals and monopolizing control within its “caliphate’s” borders. In contrast, Al-Qaeda and its affiliates, like Syria’s Al-Nusra Front, have attempted to manage a complex set of relationships with local factions and, wherever possible, rally them behind Al-Qaeda’s leadership.

This was the impetus for Al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahri’s May 8 audio message called Hasten To Syria, in which he urged Syria’s “mujahedin” (holy warriors) to unify, calling it “a matter of life and death.”

While Zawahri used the recording to speak to various constituencies, his primary audience seems not to have been the Al-Nusra Front or the Salafi-jihadist hardcore. Rather, Zawahri was apparently addressing Syria’s other Islamist rebels -- chiefly opposition faction and Islamist movement Ahrar al-Sham -- groups which have rejected IS but which have been wary of Al-Nusra Front’s affiliation with Al-Qaeda.

Syria, Zawahri made clear, is now the center of the jihadist world.

“Syria today is the hope of the Muslim nation,” he said, “because it is the lone popular revolution of the Arab Spring revolutions that has adopted the correct path.”

Syria’s fighters are on their way to erecting a righteous Islamic state -- not IS’s tyrannical, false “caliphate,” he suggested. But he warned against the conspiracies of what he termed Crusader enemies and their Arab puppets.

Zawahri did deliver at least one message aimed at the jihadist base, affirming that the IS’s members are “Khawarij,” a historical Muslim sect of hyper-extremist deviants. Labeling the Islamic State group as such has been controversial within Salafi-jihadism -- theorist Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi has resisted it -- in part because it requires jihadists to act on the Prophet Muhammad’s prescription for dealing with the Khawarij: “qatl Ad,” or total extermination. Zawahri has now come down firmly on one side of this intra-jihadist debate.

But much of the rest of the recording was implicitly directed at Syrian rebels outside the narrow circle of Salafi-jihadism, whom Zawahri attempted to reassure about Al-Qaeda’s intentions. Zawahri emphasized that Al-Nusra Front and Al-Qaeda are not interested in monopolizing power in Syria but rather in championing God’s law and an Islamic state chosen by Syria’s people. “We are not -- by the grace of God -- seekers of power, but rather seekers of the rule of God’s law,” said Zawahri. “We do not want to rule Muslims; rather, we want to be ruled, as Muslims, by Islam.”

And if it were necessary to establish this righteous Islamic government, Zawahri said, then “organizational membership (i.e., Al-Nusra Front’s Al-Qaeda affiliation) would never -- God permitting -- be an obstacle to these great aspirations.”

Some in the media thought this meant Zawahri was giving Al-Nusra Front the green light to cut ties with Al-Qaeda. But, in fact, Zawahri was laying out a trade: The dissolution of Al-Nusra Front’s Al-Qaeda affiliation is conditional on the erection of an Islamic government that meets Al-Qaeda’s purist standards.

This was no real concession, but rather an endorsement of Al-Nusra Front’s existing stipulations for breaking its Al-Qaeda link. In fact, Zawahri’s arguments were entirely in line with those of Al-Nusra Front and its chief, Abu Muhammad al-Jolani, who made the same point in an interview with Al-Jazeera in June 2015:

“We’ve said to all the [rebel] factions: When we really come together and create an Islamic government -- and these are not my words, these are the words of Dr. Ayman [al-Zawahri] himself -- he said that when Syria has a righteous Islamic government approved by the consensus of its factions, when it is governed by consultation, when the law of Greatest God is the authority, then we will be the first soldiers of this righteous government.”

Short of this condition, Al-Nusra Front has refused to break with Al-Qaeda. That is what apparently scuttled rebel merger talks in January, when Ahrar al-Sham’s insistence on breaking the Al-Qaeda ties and Nusra’s refusal brought negotiations to an impasse.

With that in mind, Zawahri’s discussion of an Islamic government seemed mostly theoretical. He was speaking broadly about the mujahedin’s ultimate aim in Syria, not issuing an urgent call for the creation of an Islamic emirate.

Zawahri did not say this explicitly, but there are a number of obstacles to the declaration of an Islamic emirate in the near term, including rebels’ current preoccupation with a defensive battle against the Syrian government and its allies. But -- more pertinent in this case -- an emirate also requires the consensus endorsement of Ahl al-Shoukeh (the People of Influence), including Syria’s most important rebel factions. So long as Ahrar al-Sham and others continue to object to Al-Nusra Front’s Al-Qaeda link and refuse to jointly declare a jihadist emirate (and thus become international pariahs), then an emirate is off the table.

In the meantime, Zawahri seemed unperturbed by the controversy over Al-Nusra Front’s Al-Qaeda link, which he dismissed as the product of foreign dictates, “an attempt,” he said, “to distract the mujahid Muslim community in Syria from its real enemies.”

Just as Al-Nusra Front’s leader Jolani did in his June 2015 interview, Zawahri questioned what good it would do if the group somehow split from Al-Qaeda. Would that be enough, Zawahri asked rhetorically, or would these “Crusader criminals” extract a series of more and more humiliating concessions from its members before ultimately tossing its members in prison, as happened with the Islamic Salvation Front (FIS) in Algeria and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

Geneva talks, truces -- all of these are conspiracies, Zawahri said. And he warned rebels who have been partnering with regional patrons and tentatively engaging in the political process not to listen to “the whispers of these subservient, puppet, apostate governments.”

Zawahri instead called on rebels to emulate the Taliban’s Mullah Omar, who famously sacrificed his emirate rather than surrender Osama bin Laden to the West. According to Zawahri, this steadfastness is what defeated the “Crusader” military apparatus, first in Afghanistan and then in Iraq.

And therein lies the tragedy when Al-Qaeda has adopted your cause: Al-Qaeda operates in a frame of reference in which Syria has been the lone success story of the Arab Spring, not an insane bloodbath; in which Afghanistan and Iraq were victories, not permanently destroyed countries and societies.
Now, Zawahri said, Al-Qaeda has wed its fortunes to that of the Syrian revolution.

“Your victory is our victory,” he said, “your honor is our honor, and your empowerment is our empowerment.”

And while he may ultimately aspire to an Islamic state -- not more butchery and death -- he and Al-Qaeda are clearly ready to pay a terrible human cost along the way.

Sam Heller is a Beirut-based freelance writer whose work has been published by VICE News, The Daily Beast, World Politics Review, War on the Rocks, IHS Jane's, and elsewhere. Follow Sam on Twitter at @abujamajem

Kadena worker admits strangling, stabbing woman found dead in Okinawa: source

The Japan TimesMAY 20, 2016
A former U.S. Marine has admitted to killing a young woman whose body was found in bushes beside a road in central Okinawa, investigative sources said Friday.

Kenneth Franklin Shinzato, 32, told police on Thursday that he strangled and stabbed 20-year-old Rina Shimabukuro, an office worker from Uruma, the sources said. He was arrested on suspicion of dumping the victim’s body, a procedural step common in suspected murder cases.

An autopsy was unable to confirm the cause of death, police said Friday.

Shinzato, a civilian employee of U.S. Kadena Air Base, lives further south in the nearby town of Yonabaru with his wife and child. He was questioned on a voluntary basis on Monday.

Police say they found Shimabukuro’s body based on a statement Shinzato made on Thursday. He told police he dumped her in a wooded area after she stopped moving. Her body was found lying in undergrowth beside a road in the village of Onna, north of Uruma.

Over several days of voluntary questioning until his arrest Thursday, there were times when Shinzato could not be interrogated because he had taken a large amount of sleeping pills.

In the meantime, police have been unable to find Shimabukuro’s shoes and smartphone.

Investigative sources say police found a small amount of blood matching her DNA in Shinzato’s car. Since the amount was small, police suspect she was stabbed somewhere else.

Shimabukuro’s boyfriend was the last person to hear from her. He said she used Line to tell him around 8 p.m. on April 28 that she was going out for a walk. The boyfriend reported her missing the following day.

GPS data received from Shimabukuro’s smartphone shows her last confirmed location was an industrial area near her home in Uruma, the sources said.

Shinzato was a newcomer to Yonabaru, having moved there in March with his wife and baby.
Neighbors expressed shock.

“It looked like he was living a normal life. I don’t have a negative image of him,” one neighbor said.

Another, a 60-year-old woman, said: “I had been wondering what was going on because police cars have been parked nearby for the past few days.”

Okinawa hosts the bulk of U.S. military bases in Japan. Uruma hosts Camp Courtney and Camp McTureous.
Another violent crime against a Japanese is certain to fuel the already harsh anti-base sentiment in the prefecture.

Okinawa Gov. Takeshi Onaga, who has sparred with the central government on the contentious relocation plan for U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Futenma, expressed “extreme sorrow” over the incident on Thursday night.

“I don’t know what to do with this anger,” he said.

Tensions over the conduct of U.S. personnel have flared periodically over the years since the 1995 rape of a 12-year-old Okinawan schoolgirl by three U.S. servicemen prompted a wave of lasting public outrage.

The latest case again raised the question of how the civilian base worker will be processed under the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement, which defines the rules for handling U.S. military and other personnel.

Japanese prosecutors cannot indict members of U.S. forces or their “civilian component” if offenses are deemed to have been committed while on duty. The bilateral agreement says U.S. authorities in principle have the primary right to exercise jurisdiction in such cases.

Okinawa police say Shinzato will be categorized as a “civilian component” of the U.S. military. But since SOFA does not cover those who are off duty, Shinzato is expected to be tried under Japan’s legal system.

Some foreign investors target India's top bourse in rare shareholder backlash

Brokers trade at their computer terminals at a stock brokerage firm in Mumbai, India, February 17, 2016.   REUTERS/Shailesh Andrade


Some foreign investors are accusing India's National Stock Exchange of dragging its feet on an initial public offering, saying management is ignoring them and purging their views from minutes of meetings, letters and emails seen by Reuters show.

Five investors, who together own 10.1 percent of India's biggest exchange by trading volumes, said "shareholder interest and corporate governance norms have been blatantly disregarded" as a result, according to a March 7 letter sent to the bourse and seen by Reuters, which has previously not been reported.

"The NSE is a model of poor corporate governance," said Sohil Chand, a managing director at U.S. firm Norwest Venture Partners, one of the foreign funds that signed the letter, in an interview. "There is zero transparency and there's zero accountability."

An NSE spokesman rejected the accusations but declined to discuss individual letters.

"We do not want to respond to those misplaced concerns and motivated campaigns," the spokesman said in an email.

The investor letters and emails mark an escalation in a months-long battle between the exchange and these investors over a potential listing of the NSE.

The funds, some of which have invested in the NSE for almost a decade, want the exchange to list as soon as possible so that they can exit and pay back investors in their funds.

But the company has been reluctant because Indian law requires it to list on another exchange rather than on itself, which would expose it to being regulated by a rival bourse.

The NSE has said it is lobbying regulators for permission to self-list or be regulated by the country's securities regulator.

The fight is the latest sign that shareholder activism, though still rare, is beginning to gain traction in India, where companies face few challenges from investors and governance problems are common.

Most recently, Children's Investment Fund waged a two-year battle against Coal India (COAL.NS) and the government over accusations of mismanagement, which ended after the British-based hedge fund exited from its investment in 2014.

That increased activism is visible more broadly across Asia, as investors seek better returns amid ultra-low interest rates and sluggish global growth.

Recent examples include an unsuccessful public campaign by BlackRock Inc against a deal planned by a Hong Kong firm G-Resources Group Ltd, and high-profile battles waged against South Korea's Samsung Group and Japanese videogame maker Nintendo Co Ltd.

"NOT DRAGGING FEET"

In the case of NSE, the funds leading the campaign are all foreign institutional investors who invested in the market by buying stakes from earlier domestic institutional investors.

Other funds that signed the March 7 letter consist of a group of private equity and venture capital firms, most of which have funds based in Mauritius: Beacon India, GTI Capital, DVI and SAIF Partners.
An NSE board member who stepped down this year denied the investors' accusations and said the company had genuine concerns about listing on a separate exchange.

He said there had been a lot of misinformation regarding the NSE's stance.

"Some shareholders are getting very impatient. They think we are dragging our feet, which is not correct," he told Reuters, declining to be identified as he has not been authorized to speak by the exchange.
In equities, still the main part of the business, the NSE had average daily volumes of 171.9 billion rupees ($2.56 billion) in April, and it monitors governance across its more than 1,600 listed securities.

The older BSE Ltd, formerly known as Bombay Stock Exchange, had 27.3 billion rupees in average daily volumes last month.

Further rankling the NSE investors, BSE has said it will file a prospectus for an IPO within six to nine months as it aims to list by next year, probably on the NSE.

Tensions between the NSE and the five investors go back to at least the middle of last year, but the acrimony has intensified this year, letters and emails between these shareholders and the NSE show.

In February, the NSE sent minutes from a meeting to its shareholders, saying "all shareholders welcomed" developments such as the creation of a listing committee, according to a copy of the minutes seen by Reuters.

It also said there were "no conceptual issues against" a planned restructuring that would create a separate holding company to oversee operations, the minutes show.

The minutes prompted an angry response from the investors. In the March 7 letter, they said the minutes "misrepresent the true proceedings and discussions".

SAIF Managing Partner Ravi Adusumalli said his fund was ready to call for a replacement of management as well as the board if the exchange does not push for an IPO this year.

"We have been extremely reasonable for years now and have tried to work with management," said Adusumalli.

"But we have run out of patience."
($1 = 67.2425 Indian rupees)

(Editing by Paritosh Bansal and Mike Collett-White)

 

The last time information from Donald Trump’s income-tax returns was made public, the bottom line was striking: He had paid the federal government $0 in income taxes.

The disclosure, in a 1981 report by New Jersey gambling regulators, revealed that the wealthy Manhattan investor had for at least two years in the late 1970s taken advantage of a tax-code provision popular with developers that allowed him to report negative income.

Today, as the presumptive Republican presidential nominee,
Trump regularly denounces corporate executives for using loopholes and “false deductions to “get away with murder” when it comes to avoiding taxes.

“They make a fortune. They pay no tax,” Trump said last year on CBS. “It’s ridiculous, okay?”
Donald Trump's stance on presidential candidates has changed significantly over the years. Here's how. (Peter Stevenson/The Washington Post)

The contrast highlights a potentially awkward challenge for Trump.


Bangladesh: Struggle to Reclaim 1971

1971
The problems of the liberation war were deep rooted. After the Awami League came to power as the first government of Bangladesh, religious political parties were banned, so was the Jamaat. The liberation movement started as the language issue in 1952, when the Bengalis of East Pakistan rejected imposition of Urdu by West Pakistan.

by Bhaskar Roy

( May 19, 2016, New Delhi, Sri Lanka Guardian) On May 11, Jamaat-e-Islami (JEI) Bangladesh Amir, Motiur Rehman Nizami was hanged to death.

The sentence was carried out following the judgement of the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) Bangladesh, set up by the present Awami League led government in 2009, to try those who killed and raped innocent Bangladeshis on behalf of the Pakistani army in 1971. His appeal to the Bangladesh Supreme Court was rejected. He preferred not to appeal for presidential clemency. His acolytes in the Jamaat said his only appeal will be to Allah, and not any man made justice system.

Till now the perpetrators of genocide executed include Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed (November, 2015), Mohammed Kamruzzaman (April 2015), Abdul Qader Mollah (December 2013), all top Jamaat leaders, and top leaders of killer squad Al Badar set up by the Pakistani army. The other executed was Salauddin Quader Choudhury (November 2015) originally of Jamaat, but later joined the BNP formed by President Gen Zia-ur-Rehman in 2008. Gen. Zia came to power in 2007 through a coup.

The original head of the Jamaat till 2000, Ghulam Azam was sentenced to 90 years of imprisonment in July 2013 by the ICT, in view of his old age. He died in prison in October 2014. Another top leader Delwar Hossain Sayeedi has been sentenced to life imprisonment. More are on trial.

Ghulam Azam was the kingpin of the Razakars referred to as the “serpent’s head”. According to statistics from the Bangladeshi government, around three million were killed and approximately 200 thousand women raped by the Pakistani army and their Bangladeshi collaborators. The figures have been corroborated approximately by independent sources. This was a genocide next only to Adolf Hitler’s purge of the Jews, otherwise known as the Holocaust.

Most western nations had sharply criticized the ICT. Some of them are now coming around to understand or at least, acknowledge, that the Jamaat is the root of the religious extremist problem in Bangladesh which has dangerous regional and global ramifications. With the advent of the Islamic State (IS) or Daesh the international community cannot afford to have a forward looking and modernising member of the global community go down the Daesh way.

The Human Rights Watch (HRW), which continues to attack Bangladesh on the ICT and the executions are narrowly focussed and do not have a historical view. They remain heavily biased. They have not been able to make a dent on the laws of execution in the United States. Bangladesh and the rest of South Asia (including India) are not what Western Europe is today, though there is a robust debate in India over capital punishment. In terms of development many of these countries are in the 19th century or early 20th century. In India the Supreme Court has ruled that death penalty should be pronounced in the “rarest of rare cases”.

What Ghulam Azam, Nizami and their cohorts had done is much worse than the “rarest of rare”. Imagine pregnant women being disembowelled. Or little children being forced to drink belly full of water and made to run for target practice by Pakistani soldiers. There are not imaginative stories, but stomach churning facts. A documentary made by an Indian film maker just as the war was ending can make a slightly sensitive person sick. These emotions cannot be assuaged by HRW values.

Killer groups like the dreaded Al Badr, Al Shams and the all-pervading Razakars were set up by the Pakistani army. Even Pakistani army officers like Sadiq Salik who were posted in East Pakistan, were so sickened by the atrocities that they resigned their commission and wrote about the torture massacre and brutality they witnessed. These books are still available.

Ten million refugees came to India to escape the genocide. Most went back when the country was liberated. The minority Hindus, who are taken as naturally anti-Pakistan, and any Bengali Muslim who were slightly suspected of being pro-liberation or independent were the targets. One has only to walk up the stairs of the Dhaka club to see photographs of some of the atrocities committed by the Pakistani army and their cohorts. In fact, the Jamaat auxiliary army was far more cruel than the Pakistani army.

Two issues need to be examined here. First, there is a cry for human rights of the likes of Nizami, Qader Mollah and a host of others. What about the human rights of the millions killed and thousands of women raped by these same men and their murderous gangs? Very little is spoken about it. Many survivors who witnessed these attacks are alive today. The ICT did not lose sight of the human rights of the murderers either. The head of the Jamaat till 2000. Ghulam Azam was awarded life imprisonment considering his advanced age. So was Mojaheed, a minister in Khaleda Zia’s BNP-Jamaat led government from 2001-2006.

The problems of the liberation war were deep rooted. After the Awami League came to power as the first government of Bangladesh, religious political parties were banned, so was the Jamaat. The liberation movement started as the language issue in 1952, when the Bengalis of East Pakistan rejected imposition of Urdu by West Pakistan. The Jamaat, religious extremism and the demand for independence came in later. The East Pakistan (Bangladesh) based Awami League won the 1970 Pakistan general elections, and Sk. Mujibur Rahman was to become prime minister of Pakistan. West Pakistan nullified the election results, arrested Sk. Mujibut Rahman, established martial law in East Pakistan, and launched “Operation Searchlight” in March 1971, rounding up and killing opponents. The carnage began. Just before the army surrendered to the Indian forces Bengali intellectuals in all fields were rounded up and executed by Al Badr.

Sk Mujibur Rahman and most of his family members were assassinated by a group of young officers on August 15, 1975. August 15 is India’s Independence Day. The message was not missed. The coup was not by a handful of young, hot headed army officers. This was a huge conspiracy which included two prominent ministers later found to be long term Pakistani moles, moles in the new Bangladeshi army, the Pakistani army and establishment with some help from Dr. Henry Kissinger and the CIA. Kissinger had taken the break up of Pakistan as a personal affront.

Following Sk. Mujibur Rahman’s assassination Bangladesh began to unravel. Zia-ur-Rehman became the army chief through a coup within the army, and President of Bangladesh through another almost simultaneous coup. He formed the BNP, legalised the Jamaat-e-Islami, and pardoned the entire Razakar family. Zia was killed in a coup in 1981, perhaps a fitting end to a man who rose through assassinations and coups. This story remains to be told. But he planted the seeds to what is being witnessed in Bangladesh today.

During the lost BNP-Jamaat led government rule, extremism and terrorism took roots (see earlier SAAG papers by this writer on the subject). Political murders of the opposition including the near fatal attack on Sk. Hasina then the opposition leader in 2004, countrywide bomb blasts by the JMB and cover for the extremists by the government will eventually have to be accounted for.

Attacks on secular bloggers and teachers, and minorities have recently raised concerns for the US. The US is coming together with Bangladesh and India to counter this menace. Although the Islamic State has been claiming responsibility for these killings, Prime Minister Sk. Hasina has taken the correct strategy to deny the presence of the IS in Bangladesh. For one, there is no evidence that IS has established itself in Bangladesh. Next, giving importance to these claims will only encourage these elements.

Unfortunately, and dangerously for Bangladesh, is political assassination returning? In March this year, a New York court sentenced Rizue Ahmed Caesar, FBI agent Robert Lustiyik and another American citizen to different terms of jail for accessing privileged information from the FBI about Sajeeb Wajad Joy. Caesar is the son of head of BNP’s US unit, Mohammed Ullah Mamun. Joy is the son of Prime Minister Sk. Hasina. The US court concluded the intention was to harm Joy physically. At least two other journalists connected closely with the BNP have been arrested in connection with this conspiracy.

What cannot be disassociated with these developments is the Pakistani reaction to Nizami’s execution. Pakistan’s foreign office condemned the action. Pakistan’s national parliament also passed a resolution similarly castigating the execution of Nizami and offered prayers for his departed soul. This has naturally attracted a backlash from Bangladesh and resulted in both countries withdrawing their envoys from each other’s country.

The War Crimes Tribunal and its verdict in each case has been criticized. What adds to the problem is the expulsion of two officials of the Pakistani Mission in Dhaka in the last few months, on charges of funding terrorism, specifically the JMB. A manager of the Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) was expelled from Bangladesh on similar grounds. The Bangladesh government gave these incidents the minimum of publicity in the interest of bilateral relations.

There is a long way to go, however. If one of the two largest political parties still retains supportive role from a country which committed virtual genocide, the second largest killing of innocent people after Hitler’s massacre of Jews, the future does not portend well. It is time that the younger, progressive leaders of BNP do some deep introspection, eschew the old rigid ideology, and think about the nation’s future. 
Every democratic government needs a good and constructive opposition. There is a lot of space.
( The writer is a strategic analyst based in New Delhi, India)