Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

SLT mitigates large foreign exchange loss, additional taxes


article_image
by Sanath Nanayakkare- 

Sri Lanka Telecom (SLT) has been able to mitigate the effects of a large foreign exchange loss arising from the steep depreciation of the rupee and the additional taxes imposed on mobile operators as SLT Group revenue in 2015 rose by a modest 4.6%, while operating profit increased by18.9% over the previous year, the Annual Report 2015 issued by SLT stated.

The Report has been made on concepts, principles and guidance given in the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Reporting Guidelines G4, International Integrated Reporting Framework and Smart Integrated Reporting Methodology TM, where applicable, it was stated.

Issuing a message to shareholders, Kumarasinghe Sirisena, SLT PLC chairman stated," Shareholders will be glad to note that despite the temporary setback, SLT will be declaring a first and final dividend for the year 2015 which is on par with the dividend declared in the previous year."

Group CEO Dileepa Wijesundare stated, "SLT and the Group posted revenue growths of 4.1% and 4.6% respectively over the previous year, while operating profits grew at 6.5% and 18.9% respectively. While these are commendable results achieved in a competitive environment, they did not translate into bottom line growths in terms of profitability, primarily due to the unprecedented 9% depreciation of the Sri Lanka rupee during the year which impacted on our foreign currency borrowings. The internally generated foreign currency inflows could not fully neutralize this."

Explaining the measures taken to manage risks, Wijesundare said, "We have taken a closer look at our risk management system. We have appointed a Group Treasury Committee and are reducing our dollar denominated borrowings. SLT has weathered many a storm in the past 150 years and more so as a pioneer and trailblazer in ICT in Sri Lanka. We face the future with confidence and commit ourselves to deliver the full benefits of broadband connectivity to all Sri Lankans, while continuing to deliver significant direct as well as indirect contributions to the Sri Lankan economy."
Taxes result of failed projects: Ranjan

2016-04-20 20
The Government had to increase the taxes as a result of the unprofitable projects launched by the former Government, Social Empowerment and Welfare Deputy Minister Ranjan Ramanayake said today.

 After the discussion held at the Temple Trees with the Prime Minister regarding the May Day rally, speaking to the media, Mr. Ramanayake said the Rajapaksa family had placed the country in heavy debt of nearly of Rs. 10 trillion, by implementing several unsuccessful projects, such as Noraichcholai Coal Power Plant, Magampura Mahinda Rajapaksa Port, Mattala Rajapaksa International Airport and the Suriyawewa Cricket Stadium.

 “In my view, as a politician and an artiste, taxes should not be implemented on people, who had suffered for years. Every Sri Lankan child comes to this world with a debt of Rs. 500,000. The Government is forced to increase taxes and it is not doing it deliberately. The Government does not intend to trouble already suffering people by imposing these taxes,” he said.
 He said the President, and the Prime Minister would come to an appropriate decision regarding the tax increase after discussions. (Kalathma Jayawardhane)

S.M. Wickremasinghe to resign from police?

S.M. Wickremasinghe to resign from police?
Apr 20, 2016
Senior DIG S.M. Wickremasinghe, who was the acting IGP following the retirement of N.K. Illangakoon, is to resign from police, say police department sources. In charge of the security of both president Maithripala Sirisena and his predecessor Mahinda Rajapaksa, Wickremasinghe had very high hopes to become the IGP.

After Pujith Jayasundara was recommended by the Constitutional Council to the president to be the new IGP, Wickremasinghe had become very angry and disappointed and immediately sent his resignation letter to the police department, with copies sent to the defence secretary, president and the prime minister. “I will not remain in service under those who are junior to me,” he has been saying these days.

Poojith Senadhibandara Jayasundara takes over duties as new IGP outstripping 1536 petitions accusing him !


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 20.April.2016, 11.45PM) Poojith Senadhibandara Jayasundara was today (20) appointed as the 34 th   IGP of the Sri Lanka Democratic Socialist Republic by president Maithripala Sirisena on the reommendation of the Constitutonal Council  (CC). The new IGP today took over duties officially at the auspicious time 4.00 p.m. at the Police headquarters.
He is scheduled to offically address his officers on Friday the 22 nd , after which he is preparing to hold a media briefing .
In protest against the appointment of Poojith as the new IGP , his opponents filed   1536 petitions  accusing him , and sent 410 e mail messages to those responsible . These accusations notwithstanding ,  Poojith was a popular character among officers of all rungs and  was also a popular lecturer within the police. For a long time he had been building a  friendly image among the media personnel too, and was never  tainted by human rights violations  and  had a strong  inclination  to develop his image .   
Poojith Senadhibandara Jayasundara was born on 15 th March 1960 in Kurunegala ,and is an old boy of Dharmapala College , Kandy. He is a B.Com. special graduate of  the Sri Jayawardenapura University.
The new IGP Poojith Jayasundara has a great responsibility on his shoulders to create a new society that is law abiding,  in a country where class difference , religious animosity ,  political opportunism , corruption and drug menace are entrenched and inextricably interwoven in the society , he must decide in his future journey whether he shall be the victor or the vanquished in his efforts . 
Like how Lanka e news wished well all the IGPs before when they commenced their duties , we wish the new IGP Poojith Jayasundara too all the best while hoping that Poojith Jayasundara will have the courage, daring  and vision to achieve his goals in  his mission and challenges . 


---------------------------
by     (2016-04-20 23:23:49)

Justice for senior Army officers sidelined by Rajapaksa regime

Justice for senior Army officers sidelined by Rajapaksa regime
Apr 20, 2016
There are many officers who were subjected to various injustices and personally avenged by ex-defence secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, ex-Army commanders and other senior officers close to Gotabhaya. They had been denied promotions, ranks and foreign training.
Most of these officers had joined the Army during the 1980s, had to leave their parents, wives and children to serve in operational areas, have completed or neared 30 years of service, and are to retire in a few years’ time.
The incumbent commander inquired into their plight. He awarded the NDC course to a Gajaba regiment officer who had been unfairly treated by Gotabhaya for five years, promoted to major general an engineering corps officer who had been opposed by the ex-commander for four years, promoted to brigadier the four offices who was unfairly treated by the former signal corps commander, recommended a designation and a promotion for an officer unfairly treated by the eastern security forces commander for three years, promoted to brigadier an officer who had been sidelined by the former chief of staff for two years, given a directorate to an officer who had been transferred from the headquarters, where he had held two directorates, to the eastern security forces headquarters.
Senior Army officers say justice should be done for the officers who are presently being unfairly treated by certain senior officers and regimental heads.
When asked for comments, two major generals, one presently serving and the other who has retired, said justice could be done to such officers by considering recommendations not only by the regimental heads, but also by the heads of divisions where they had previously served and presently serving, recommendations by the directorates and the confidential reports for previous years, when giving promotions.

2016 World Press Freedom Index ­– leaders paranoid about journalists

April 20, 2016
Most of the movement in the World Press Freedom Index unveiled today by Reporters Without Borders is indicative of a climate of fear and tension combined with increasing control over newsrooms by governments and private-sector interests.

Читать по-русски / Read in Russian

The 2016 World Press Freedom Index reflects the intensity of the attacks on journalistic freedom and independence by governments, ideologies and private-sector interests during the past year.

Seen as a benchmark throughout the world, the Index ranks 180 countries according to the freedom allowed journalists. It also includes indicators of the level of media freedom violations in each region. 
These show that Europe (with 19.8 points) still has the freest media, followed distantly by Africa (36.9), which for the first time overtook the Americas (37.1), a region where violence against journalists is on the rise. Asia (43.8) and Eastern Europe/Central Asia (48.4) follow, while North Africa/Middle East (50.8) is still the region where journalists are most subjected to constraints of every kind.


Three north European countries head the rankings. They are Finland (ranked 1st, the position it has held since 2010), Netherlands (2nd, up 2 places) and Norway (3rd, down 1). The countries that rose most in the Index include Tunisia (96th, up 30), thanks to a decline in violence and legal proceedings, and Ukraine (107th, up 22), where the conflict in the east of the country abated.

The countries that fell farthest include Poland (47th, down 29), where the ultra-conservative government seized control of the public media, and (much farther down) Tajikistan, which plunged 34 places to 150th as a result of the regime’s growing authoritarianism. The Sultanate of Brunei (155th, down 34) suffered a similar fall because gradual introduction of the Sharia and threats of blasphemy charges have fuelled self-censorship. Burundi (156th, down 11) fell because of the violence against journalists resulting from President Pierre Nkurunziza’s contested reelection for a third term. The same “infernal trio” are in the last three positions: Turkmenistan (178th), North Korea (179th) and Eritrea (180th).

“It is unfortunately clear that many of the world’s leaders are developing a form of paranoia about legitimate journalism,”RSF secretary-general Christophe Deloire

“The climate of fear results in a growing aversion to debate and pluralism, a clampdown on the media by ever more authoritarian and oppressive governments, and reporting in the privately-owned media that is increasingly shaped by personal interests. Journalism worthy of the name must be defended against the increase in propaganda and media content that is made to order or sponsored by vested interests. 

Guaranteeing the public’s right to independent and reliable news and information is essential if humankind’s problems, both local and global, are to be solved.”

Published annually by RSF since 2002, the World Press Freedom Index is an important advocacy tool based on the principle of emulation between states. Because it is now so well known, its influence over the media, governments and international organizations is growing.

The Index is based on an evaluation of media freedom that measures pluralism, media independence, the quality of the legal framework and the safety of journalists in 180 countries. It is compiled by means of a questionnaire in 20 languages that is completed by experts all over the world. This qualitative analysis is combined with quantitative data on abuses and acts of violence against journalists during the period evaluated.

The Index is not an indicator of the quality of the journalism in each country, nor does it rank public policies even if governments obviously have a major impact on their country’s ranking.

FIND OUT MORE

A sophisticated methodology

A general decline

Focus on the regions

Palestinian wounded in Jerusalem bus bombing dies, Hamas claims him

Israeli police forensic experts work at the scene after an explosion tore through a bus in Jerusalem. REUTERS/Ammar Awad

Thu Apr 21, 2016

A Palestinian militant from the occupied West Bank who was wounded when his bomb exploded on an Israeli commuter bus in Jerusalem on Monday has died, an Israeli hospital spokeswoman and a pro-Hamas website said on Wednesday.

A spokeswoman for the Jerusalem hospital where the wounded man was treated confirmed he had succumbed to his injuries. Israeli authorities have placed a gag order on the investigation and declined to release any details.

The pro-Hamas Palestinian Information Centre identified him as Abdel-Hamid Abu Srour from the Ayda refugee camp near Bethlehem and said he was a member of the Izz el-Deen Al-Qassam brigades, the armed wing of the Hamas militant Islamist group.

The explosion blew up a bus, wounding 16 people, and caused a fire on a nearby bus. In a speech hours afterwards, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu linked the attack to a six-month-old wave of Palestinian street violence.

Israeli medical sources said six people wounded by the blast were still being treated in hospital, the rest had been released by late Wednesday.

Suicide bombings on Israeli buses were a hallmark of the Palestinian revolt of 2000-2005 but have been rare since. With Palestinians carrying out less organised stabbing, car-ramming and gun attacks since October, Israel has been braced for an escalation.

In the last half year, Palestinian attacks have killed 28 Israelis and two visiting U.S. citizens. Israeli forces have killed at least 191 Palestinians, 130 of whom Israel says were assailants. Many others were shot dead in clashes and protests.

Factors driving the violence include Palestinian bitterness over stalled statehood negotiations and the growth of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, increased Jewish access to a disputed Jerusalem shrine and Islamist-led calls for Israel's destruction.

(Additional reporting by Nidal al-Mughrabi in Gaza; Writing by Ori Lewis; Editing by Tom Heneghan)
Italian worker kidnapped in Libya demands answers from his government

After eight months in captivity, Gino Pollicardo wants to know whether reports that Italy tried to negotiate his release are true

Libya has seen a violent struggle among the Islamic State group, various militias and criminal groups in recent months (AFP)


Francesca Mannocchi-
Wednesday 20 April 2016

Eight months after Gino Pollicardo was kidnapped in Libya, the 55-year-old and his colleague Filippo Calcagno found themselves wandering the streets of Sabratha last month after breaking through a locked door with the help of a nail.

Starved and beaten in captivity, the two Italian workers searched through the town and found help from residents. It seemed the nightmare that started with their abduction last July was coming to an end.

But when they arrived in Italy, they were told that two other colleagues kidnapped along with them, Fausto Piano and Salvatore Failla, had been killed, and so another kind of nightmare began.

"When I finally landed in Italy, the minister of foreign affairs, Paolo Gentiloni, hugged me and told me: 'Gino, it's all over',” Pollicardo said.

Pollicardo said he felt “a great anger” at the thought of his slain colleagues. “I feel guilty for having survived,” he said.

And he also had a question, one that had lingered for months. Pollicardo said one of the kidnappers told the four workers there was a mysterious Italian negotiator in town, in talks about their ransom. Could the Italian government, he wondered, have ended the ordeal sooner and more safely?

"We had to free ourselves, and it is something I will never forgive the Italian authorities for,” he said.
A spokesman for Gentiloni, the Italian foreign minister, did not respond to a Middle East Eye query about whether a ransom had been paid.

In recent weeks however, Gentiloni told members of the Italian Senate that the state did not pay a ransom, and also said that there was no evidence the kidnapping involved the Islamic State (IS) militant group.

“The best hypothesis is that of a pro-Islamic criminal gang operating between Mellita, Zuwara and Sabratha,” he said.

But the mayor of Sabratha, Dhawadi Hussein, told Middle East Eye that the interrogation of a man who drove the workers from Tunisia to Libya and others led local police to believe that IS was involved. 
Whatever the case, Pollicardo said the Italian government has many questions to answer.
“If it is true that in November there was a negotiator in Libya, as we were told, if it’s true that there were Italian intelligence men who were dealing with our captors, I demand to know what went wrong,” he said. “I owe it to the memory of my two dead colleagues."

Troubles ahead

Even before the workers arrived in Libya, they knew there were problems.

The plan, Pollicardo said, was that the four technicians, who worked for Bonatti, an Italian general contractor servicing the oil and gas industry, would travel from Tunisia into western Libya, where the Greenstream gas pipeline runs through the city of Mellitha.

For years, Bonatti has worked as a subcontractor on local compounds for Italian energy giant Eni.

The men were supposed to arrive bt ship in Libya, but when they landed in Tunisia, Bonatti told them there was a programme change: They would enter Libya by car via a road considered to be dangerous.

"We immediately had the feeling that the driver – who we knew - was hiding something,” Pollicardo said.

As the trip continued, the driver received several calls on two phones before a car cut across the road, blocking their way. “He stopped,” said Pollicardo, “as if he agreed with who was driving that car.”

Two men approached. They threatened the workers with guns, hooded them and forced them into another car.

‘We became brothers’

After they were abducted, they were taken to a house not far away. They were moved only once after that, but not too far away and always in Sabratha,  Pollicardo said.

There were two guards in the house, whose faces were always covered.

“These eight months were very difficult. I have no words to describe them,” he said. “They did not let us eat for days, prevented us from using the bathroom. They chained our feet and often threatened us with the barrels of guns to our heads.”

“The only thing that helped us was to be four and share the fear; we become brothers to face this tragedy,” he said.

Pollicardo said he had a feeling that the kidnappers needed to keep the four alive in order to get ransom money, an impression that was confirmed in late November when one of the kidnappers told them that an Italian negotiator, described as an intelligence officer, was in Sabratha to discuss the money needed to free them.

A few weeks before the apparent arrival of the officer, Pollicardo said, the kidnappers forced the four men to make videos to demonstrate they were still alive.

But something went wrong, he said.

Pollicardo said he was told by the kidnappers: “Negotiations with the intelligence man did not go well, so for us began retaliation and revenge. We were held for days without eating and they beat us harder.”

According to a source in one of Libya’s key militias who prefers to remain anonymous, a part of $12m ransom - $4.5m - was to be paid to the driver of the four men. The rest would have gone to a criminal group. The source also told MEE that there were at least 10 Italian intelligence officers in Sabratha around that time.

Meanwhile, at the house, Pollicardo said there was fighting all around. "Every day, every night, we heard shooting,” he said. 

On 19 February, the situation for the four men changed drastically when US warplanes hit an IS training camp near Sabratha. Forty militants were killed and two Serbian diplomats, who had been abducted, also died. 

"We thought that was the end for us, that it was time to die,” Pollicardo said.
After the raid, the house where the men were being held filled with strangers, militants seeking shelter, Pollicardo thought, but also some women and a child.

“A few days after the raid, our kidnappers made us wash, “ he said. “It was the first time we'd had a shower in months. We thought they wanted to free us, but soon realised that they just wanted to move us again.”

‘Libya has become this hell’

Soon after, two of the Italian workers were taken away in a car. Pollicardo and Calcagno were left behind. 
When the car was stopped by a militia, Piano and Failla were killed in a firefight, according to an account from the Sabratha Authority, a local municipality set up to fight IS. It remains unclear who fired the shots.

A Tunisian member of IS later captured by Libyan authorities, Wahida Mukhtar Bin Ali, reportedly told investigators that she witnessed the shootout and thought that the car with the workers contained a ransom that was burned. 

Pollicardo said that when he and Calcagno were left alone in the house, they realised something must have happened and this was when they broke through the locked door to freedom. 

Residents took them to Sabratha’s municipal council headquarters, where they remained for three days.
"For three days, we did not see any Italians. We has freed ourselves alone, after eight months, and not even an Italian to ask us if we were OK,” Pollicardo said.

As they waited to go home, the head of the Sabratha Operations Room, a body set up under the city’s municipality to fight IS, told the two workers that a criminal group had offered to sell them to him for $10m.

“Criminal groups finance themselves in this way now in Libya, with kidnappings and by corrupting local authorities, who often are in collusion with the criminal groups,” he said. “Libya has become this hell.”

Supreme court rules families of terror victims can collect $2bn from Iran

Court rejects efforts by Iran’s central bank to stave off orders to pay relatives of 1983 Beirut bombing and other terrorist attacks
The lead plaintiff in the lawsuit is Deborah Peterson, whose brother, Lance Cpl James C Knipple, was killed in Beirut bombing, aftermath pictured, in 1983. Photograph: Jim Bourdier/AP

Wednesday 20 April 2016

The supreme court on Wednesday upheld a judgment allowing families of victims of the 1983 marine barracks bombing in Beirut and other terrorist attacks to collect nearly $2bn in frozen Iranian funds.

The court on Wednesday ruled 6-2 in favor of more than 1,300 relatives of the 241 US service members who died in the Beirut bombing and victims of other attacks that courts have linked to Iran.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the opinion for the court rejecting efforts by Iran’s central bank to try to stave off court orders that would allow the relatives to be paid for their losses. The money is sitting in a federal court trust account.

Iran’s Bank Markazi complained that Congress was intruding into the business of federal courts when it passed a 2012 law that specifically directs that the banks’ assets in the United States be turned over to the families. Barack Obama issued an executive order earlier in 2012 freezing the Iranian central bank’s assets in the United States.

The law, Ginsburg wrote, “does not transgress restraints placed on Congress and the president by the constitution”.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented. “The authority of the political branches is sufficient; they have no need to seize ours,” Roberts wrote.

The decision comes as controversy swirls over pending legislation in Congress that would allow families of the 9/11 attacks to hold the government of Saudi Arabia liable in US court. The Obama administration opposes the bill. Obama met King Salman in Riyadh on Wednesday at the start of a brief trip to the country.

Congress has repeatedly changed the law in the past 20 years to make it easier for victims to sue over state-sponsored terrorism; federal courts have awarded the victims billions of dollars. But Iran has refused to comply with the judgments, leading lawyers to hunt for Iranian assets in the United States.

The supreme court case involved $1.75bn in bonds, plus accumulating interest, owned by the Iranian bank and held by Citibank in New York.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit included relatives of the victims of the marine barracks bombing in Beirut, the 1996 terrorist bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia which killed 19 service members, and other attacks that were carried out by groups with links to Iran. The lead plaintiff is Deborah Peterson, whose brother, Lance Cpl James C Knipple, was killed in Beirut.

“We are extremely pleased with the supreme court’s decision, which will bring long-overdue relief to more than 1,000 victims of Iranian terrorism and their families, many of whom have waited decades for redress,” said Theodore Olson, the former Bush administration Justice Department official who argued on behalf of the families at the supreme court.

Liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans in Congress, as well as the Obama administration, supported the families in the case.

China in the Indian Ocean

racked self-propelled artillery units are displayed in a parade in Beijing, capital of China, Sept. 3, 2015. China on Thursday held commemoration activities, including a grand military parade, to mark the 70th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War. (Xinhua/Jin Liwang)
by D. S. Rajan
Abstract
( April 20, 2016, Chennai, Sri Lanka Guardian) The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has not so far come out with a codified Indian Ocean Region (IOR) strategy. The country however has a maritime vision involving the IOR in particular. For the first time in a party congress, the Work Report of the 18th Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Congress, held in November 2012, defined China as a “maritime power” that will “firmly uphold its maritime rights and interests.” The report listed following aims- enhancing capacity for exploiting marine resources, developing the marine economy, protecting the marine ecological environment, resolutely safeguarding its maritime rights and interests, and building itself into a maritime power.
The aims were included in the Work Report’s section on protecting resources, signaling China’s new perception that the maritime domain concerns both developmental and security interests. It was left subsequently to an authoritative Chinese academician to identify China’s six-fold legitimate maritime interests: i) reunifying its offshore islands; ii) safeguarding its territorial waters; iii) assuring its exclusive economic zone for its sole use, reasonably and economically; iv) protecting high sea collaboratively for global legitimate access; v) respecting those legitimate maritime rights of other states as per relevant international law; vi) resolving maritime disputes with other claimants as peacefully as possible when they may arise, while reserving all means for sovereign purpose[1]. The two- protecting high sea and use of all means on sovereignty matters, are striking in importance.

See more >>>

Avoiding the New Cold War With Russia

With two risky flyovers of U.S. military assets in a week, tensions with Moscow are high. We need to tone things down, before flyovers become bombing runs.
APRIL 20, 2016
In Ian Fleming’s iconic novel Goldfinger, the villain says about secret agent James Bond’s tendency to turn up and disrupt his plans again and again: “Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it’s enemy action.”
So what are we then to make of the two highly provocative Russian maneuvers that occurred over the past week, directed against a U.S. warshipon the Baltic high seas and a U.S. aircraft in international airspace nearby?

Vladimir Putin is playing with fire in this kind of hyper-aggressive maneuvering, and there can be little doubt the direction is coming from him, personally, given the way Russia is run today and the high-stakes nature of flying attack profiles against U.S. military assets.

In the first incident, on April 12, a Russian Su-24 jet flew within just 50 feet of the USS Donald Cook at high speed after approaching at an extremely low altitude. The U.S. ship, an Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer, held fire but would have been clearly within the rules of engagement to use defensive weapons on the Russian aircraft. Having commanded a similar ship some years ago, I can attest to the level of restraint shown by the captain; he was presented with possible hostile intent and must have at least considered shooting down the jet. The situation was mitigated by the lack of a visible weapon on the Su-24 and the absence of Russian fire control radar being actively used to “lock up” the U.S. warship.

The second incident occurred on April 17, involving a U.S. Boeing RC-135 operating in international airspace. In this instance, a Russian Su-27 did abarrel roll over the top of the slower and less maneuverable U.S. plane, at about 50 feet away. This is very dangerous (two of my carrier strike group’s F-14s managed to collide while doing this in 2004) and was more reminiscent of the kind of aerial buffoonery made famous by the film Top Gun. That kind of flying was stupid in 1986 (when we were doing it, as well as the Russians), and it is stupid now.

Tensions between Washington and Moscow are at the highest levels since the end of the Cold War more than two decades ago. This is the result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea, both violations of international law, which have resulted in severe sanctions against Russia by the United States and its European allies. Moreover, the two nations are in strong disagreement over the proper course of action in Syria, with Putin backing the execrable regime of Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad and the United States trying to put together a more moderate coalition of Syrian rebels to overcome him. The Kremlin is particularly sensitive at the moment due to the NATO buildup of exercises and troop deployments around its periphery — a direct result of its aggressive actions in Georgia and Ukraine. 
Finally, Russia is concerned with the security of Kaliningrad, a Russian enclave on the Baltic Sea (where both of the incidents occurred) that is cut off from the rest of the nation. Moscow has threatened to deploy ballistic missiles there, should the United States upgrade its nuclear arsenal in Germany.

This downward spiral into a Cold War-mentality is clearly not in anyone’s interests. So, how do we avoid it but still confront Moscow when norms of behavior demand it?

Don’t go it alone

The first rule is to act multilaterally. Setting up a “nation vs. nation” mentality is counterproductive for the United States. Washington’s responses should be within the context of NATO as much as possible, including ground, sea, and air deployments to the region. Russia wants to make this a direct confrontation with the United States and try to drive a split in the alliance. We should avoid that and continue our deployments under NATO branding, including the European Reassurance Initiative.
Pick your battles
Second, we need to confront Russia — but only where we must. In particular, we should maintain the pressure of sanctions on Moscow until it fully conforms to the Minsk cease-fire agreements; object strongly to Assad’s continuation in power; and admonish Russia for gross human rights violations. But there are many other disagreements we have with Russia about how to operate in the international system that do not require confrontation (militarizing the Arctic, walking away from arms control, deployment of ballistic missile defenses, Russian arms sales to Iran, how to operate in the cyber-world, etc.).
Cooperate where we can
As a third step, we should take a more forward-leaning approach to cooperative counterterrorism, counternarcotics, and counterpiracy — all international problems about which Washington is largely in agreement with Moscow. It is conceivable that we could work together in the Balkans to calm relations between Serbia and the breakaway Republic of Kosovo and within the still-contentious boundaries of Bosnia-Herzegovina. We could improve our cooperation on the environment, increase nongovernmental educational exchanges, and perhaps find common ground over time in Syria (though Assad will continue to be a stumbling block). We also have common interests in solving the challenges in Afghanistan and promoting peace between India and Pakistan.
More talk, less shooting
Finally, at the tactical level, we would be smart to talk more frequently with Russia on the current protocols for the military interaction of our forces. The U.S.-Soviet agreement on the prevention of incidents on and over the high seas, negotiated in 1972, is still a good foundation for how ships and aircraft should operate; it lays out very specific guidance and was a foundational doctrine during the Cold War. Bringing together the heads of the U.S. and Russian militaries in a high-level conference to review and re-energize the agreement would be a positive step.

People frequently ask me if we are back in the Cold War. My answer: not yet. The Cold War dwarfed the current tension in terms of numbers of troops, ships, and aircraft, as well as the degree of military readiness to conduct massive, global combat operations — including the real likelihood of nuclear strikes. We are not remotely at that point.

But if we do not stop provocative activities like those undertaken by the Russian aircraft last week, we will sooner or later have a shoot-down and a potentially far more dangerous confrontation. The United States, for its part, must be transparent about military deployments around the Russian periphery and emphasize that no offensive action is contemplated — doing this via the NATO-Russia Council makes sense.

There is no need to stumble backward into a new Cold War, but avoiding it will require restraint, common sense, and diplomacy, especially on the parts of both Moscow and Washington. Like Goldfinger, both sides see plenty of “enemy action” in the other’s activities, which creates a dangerous potential for miscalculation. Above all, we need to be clear with each other and tone down both the rhetoric and the acrobatic maneuvers before they escalate into ordnance flying.
Photo credit: ALEXEY DRUZHININ/AFP/Getty Images

Anders Behring Breivik, Norway murderer, wins human rights case

Breivik made complaints under two clauses of the European Convention on Human Rights
Convicted mass killer Anders Behring Breivik attends the fourth and last day in court in Skien prison, Norway, 18 March 2016General view of a cell inside Skien prison, south of Oslo, February 12, 2016
A typical cell in Skien prison looks like this

BBC20 April 2016

Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik has won part of a human rights case against the Norwegian state.

The court upheld his claim that some of his treatment amounted to "inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment".

After the judgement, Breivik's lawyer, Oystein Storrvik, called for his solitary confinement to be repealed.

Breivik, a right-wing extremist, killed dozens of young centre-left political activists in an attack on the island of Utoya in July 2011.

Earlier that day, he set off a car bomb in the capital, Oslo, killing eight people.

Kept alone

In her ruling, judge Helen Andenaes Sekulic said the right not to be subjected to inhuman treatment represented "a fundamental value in a democratic society" and also applied to "terrorists and killers".

Breivik had challenged the government over his solitary confinement, which saw him kept alone in his cell for 22 to 23 hours a day, denied contact with other inmates and only communicating with prison staff through a thick glass barrier.


His prison regime deviated so markedly from that enforced upon any other prisoner in Norway, regardless of the severity of their crimes, that it had to be considered an extra punishment, the judge said.
However, article three of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) required that prisoners be detained in conditions that did not exceed the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention, given the practical requirements of the particular case, she said.

The prison authorities had also not done enough to counteract the damage he had suffered from being in isolation, she said.

Judge Sekulic also noted that Breivik had been woken up every half hour at night over a long period of time and on some occasions subjected to strip searches with female officers present, which he found particularly difficult.

"Taken together with the other stringent restrictions which he was subject, this was regarded as degrading treatment in the Convention sense," said the judge, Norwegian national broadcaster NRK reported.

'Facilitate a community'

State lawyer Marius Emberland said the government was surprised by the verdict but had not decided whether to appeal.

If neither side appeals within four weeks, the prison is obliged to make Breivik's regime more lenient in line with the judge's remarks, NRK reported.

The prison must work to bring in other prisoners and "facilitate a community", the judge said.

However, the judge ruled that strict controls on Breivik's correspondence were justified and his right to a private and family life under article eight of the ECHR had not been violated.

The court also ordered the Norwegian state to pay Breivik's legal costs of 330,000 kroner ($40,000; £28,000).

Eskil Pedersen, a survivor of the shootings on Utoeya island, said he was "surprised, and then angry and upset" by the ruling.

"It was like being punched in the gut that the perpetrator won such a public victory," he told NRK.

Another survivor, Bjorn Ihler, tweeted that the judgement in Breivik's favour showed Norway had a "working court system, respecting human rights even under extreme conditions".

Lisbeth Kristine Roeyneland, who runs a support group for the victims' families, told NRK she was surprised and "a little disappointed", but also relieved that the ruling prevented him making contact with other extremists.

India: Police uncover ‘baby farm’ which sold and swapped infants for US$1,400

(File photo). A newborn baby boy is weighed on a scale at a government hospital in Mumbai, India. Pic: AP.
(File photo). A newborn baby boy is weighed on a scale at a government hospital in Mumbai, India. Pic: AP.

20th April 2016
POLICE in India have uncovered a syndicate operating a ‘baby farm’ from a private hospital in the Gwailor district of the central Madhya Pradesh state which sold abandoned infants.

The major exposé was reported in the Times of India which found that the newborns were treated as commodities and were either being sold or swapped for Rs 1 lakh (US$1,400) each.

The police also found that the babies born out of wedlock, either through rape or illicit relationships, who ended up at the hospital were put up for adoption for that price. So far, two newborns have been rescued from the 30-bed hospital located in the Murar area.

Police mounted the raid on the hospital last Saturday after receiving a tip-off on infant trafficking activities.

nypost

The hospital’s director T.K. Gupta was among the five arrested in connection with the case, along with a manager and the parents who bought the babies. They have been accused of numerous slavery and prostitution charges.

Crime Branch Assistant Superintendent Prateek Kumar confirmed that three babies were sold to childless couples in Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh.

“During interrogation, he (the manager) could not give us whereabouts of two babies that were found in the hospital,” he said, adding the manager had “agents” in the Chambal region who picked up girls carrying unwanted pregnancies.

Another investigating officer was quoted saying: “When a girl or her parents approached them for termination of pregnancies, doctors at this hospital used to convince them, assuring a safe and secret delivery.”
“Once baby is delivered and mother gets discharged, hospital authorities start hunting for gullible couples who could buy them.”
The report in the paper also pointed out a case in which a newborn girl was swapped with boy.
“A Gwalior-based couple had two boys. They swapped one of their boys with a girl at this hospital,” the officer said.

Police also said teams had been deployed to track those who bought the babies from the hospital, apart from launching an effort to rescue other babies that were sold.


In this photo taken on Sunday, April 17, 2016, migrants ask for help from a dinghy as they are approached by the SOS Mediterranee's ship Aquarius, background, off the coast of the Italian island of Lampedusa. (Patrick Bar/SOS Mediterranee via AP)
April 20
 As many as 500 migrants seeking a better future in Europe may have drowned last week in the Mediterranean Sea between Libya and Italy, U.N. refugee officials said Wednesday.

If confirmed, the toll would make the incident one of the worst tragedies involving refugees and migrants over the past year.

On Tuesday, a team from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) spoke with some of the 41 survivors of the alleged accident who had arrived at Kalamata, a Greek town on the Peloponnese Peninsula, the U.N. agency said in a statement.

“If confirmed, as many as 500 people may have lost their lives when a large ship went down in the Mediterranean Sea at an unknown location between Libya and Italy,” the agency said.
With summer approaching and the seas becoming calmer, this tragedy may be a harbinger of a deeper emerging crisis. So far this year, around 25,000 migrants and refugees have reached the shores of Italy from North Africa, according to Italian authorities. While those numbers are slightly more than the 24,000 who arrived during the same period last year, the United Nations and other refugee organizations are expecting more people to take rickety boats plying the risky routes across the Mediterranean to Italy.

A controversial agreement between the European Union and Turkey has dramatically reduced the numbers of refugees reaching the Greek islands. Balkan nations are closing their borders as well, 
preventing travel from Greece to Germany and beyond. That has triggered fears that more refugees and migrants could attempt to enter Europe from Egypt or Libya.

Last year, more than 1 million migrants and refugees crossed the Mediterranean. They were mostly fleeing the wars in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, using Turkey as a launching pad to Greece and then deeper into Europe. But the crossing from North Africa to Italy has historically been more perilous than the one from Turkey to Greece.

The survivors in Kalamata included 37 men, three women and a 3-year-old child. They were from Somalia, Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan. All were rescued by a merchant ship that then brought them to Greece.

“The survivors told us that they had been part of a group of between 100 and 200 people who departed last week from a locality near Tobruk in Libya on a 30-meter-long [90-foot] boat,” the UNHCR said.

After sailing for several hours, the smugglers tried to transfer the passengers to a larger ship “carrying hundreds of people in terribly overcrowded conditions,” the U.N. agency said.

“At one point during the transfer, the larger boat capsized and sank,” it added.


Italian Foreign Minister Paolo Gentiloni confirms reports of hundreds of migrants drowning when their boat sank in the Mediterranean. (Reuters)

The 41 survivors included people who had not yet boarded the bigger ship and some who managed to swim back to the smaller boat, the UNHCR said.

The survivors then drifted at sea for about three days before being rescued by the merchant ship on April 16.

The survivors are currently being housed by local authorities in a stadium in Kalamata.

Almost exactly a year ago, as many as 700 migrants and refugees were believed to have died when their boat capsized north of Libya. It was the deadliest known sea disaster involving people crossing the Mediterranean in efforts to escape conflict or poverty.

On Wednesday, the UNHCR again stressed its call for more “regular pathways” to Europe for refugees and asylum seekers, including “resettlement and humanitarian admission programs, family reunification, private sponsorship and student and work visas for refugees.”

“These will all serve to reduce the demand for people smuggling and dangerous irregular sea journeys,” said the agency.