Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Monday, April 18, 2016

In Killinochchci, a freelance reporter has been assaulted by the Military soldiers

In Killinochchci, a freelance reporter has been assaulted by the Military soldiers

14 April 2016
His camera has also been damaged -Reporter for Global Tamil News –Killinochchi-

In Killinochchi, Freelance Reporter S.N. Nipojan has been assaulted and his camera has also been damaged by the military soldiers day before yesterday.

Following are further revealed in this regard;

This particular reporter, who rushed to collect the news regarding the accident took place at the vicinity of Kudamuruti bridge located in the Paranthan- Pooneryn road, has been assaulted by the civil clothed military officer who claimed himself as Colonel. The photos in the camera of this particular reporter have also been deleted and the camera has been damaged by this military officer.

Military vehicle collided Private tipper vehicle day before yesterday. This particular reporter, who rushed to collect the news regarding this accident, has been assaulted by the civil clothed military officer who claimed himself as Colonel.

Though this particular reporter showed his Identity Card to the military man, the particular military officer attempted to assault the particular reporter while stating doesn’t matter who he is.

This particular freelance reporter has lodged a complaint in this regard at the Killinochchi Police Station. As this particular area comes under the Pooneryn Police, the Killinochchi Police told him that they would take three days to state in this regard.

In Kilinochchi, this is the second incident which attempted to assault on journalists occurred within a short time.

The Tipper Driver has been severely injured while 23-year-old military soldier had died in this accident.

CC names Poojitha Jayasundara as the new IGP and conveys to president though he is not the best choice

-The inside story-

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 18.April.2016, 11.30PM)  When the Constitutional Council (CC) met today(18) to select the new IGP, the Council chose Poojitha Jayasundara as  the IGP from the three names sent by the president to the CC. The latter after its selection conveyed its  decision to the president  , based on reports reaching Lanka e News. 
The CC that met at the parliamentary complex today (18) at  3.15 p.m.concluded the meeting  in about 45 minutes. The meeting was not attended by all the members of the CC.Only 7 members were present while Shibly Azeez and Radhika Kumaraswamy  did not participate. When the vote was taken by secret ballot in respect of the three candidates ,Poojitha received 5 votes while S. M Wickremesinghe received one . The remaining vote was annulled.  Accordingly , Poojitha’ s name was forwarded to  the president.
When the new IGP was being selected , since the CC followed a procedure  that was contradictory to that when the Attorney General (AG) was selected , there had arisen doubts and misgivings among the public. 
During the selection of the AG , when the president forwarded  three names to the CC, the latter returned the list and asked for one name only while  stating that the president can only send one name. But in this instance the CC did not adhere to this mode of selection  when electing the new  IGP.
The CC in this case had notified the secretary to the president to send the names of  three aspirants.Accordingly , the names of S.M. Wickremesinghe , Poojitha Jayasundara and Chandana Wickremeratne were forwarded to the CC. The latter thereupon , selected Poojitha Jayasundara who was second in seniority.

When inquiries were made by Lanka e News, it came to light that , it was the president himself  who had requested the CC  to send  three names , saying that he cannot name a single aspirant . It was the view of the president , since S.M. Wickremesinghe is the chief of his security contingent , and if the president names only him , it will be unfair by others . Hence , the president  had named three aspirants to  the CC to select one name with a view to  demonstrate president’s affinity for democracy , and to further prove  that the method adopted is democratic. 
Subsequently , the CC that met today had chosen Poojitha in preference to S.M . not because of the former’s suitability over S.M. but to avert unwarranted issues that can spring up in the future  if S.M. is selected. The main reason for this is , in the Thajudeen murder under  the Rajapakse era , during the future investigations pertaining to it , if and when PSD officers become the accused , and in that situation , if S.M. who was  the chief of the PSD is holding the post of IGP, it can impede and interfere with the investigations. Besides during the Rajapakse era because S.M . had been aware somewhat of the controversial Thajudeen murder , and if he is elected  the IGP  now it will render impossible for him to act impartially , and would face an embarrassing situtation during the investigations.

An investigation under way against S.M. at the Commission inquiring into allegations of bribery and corruption may have also swayed the decision of the CC against him. In the case of Chandana Wickremeratne , though there are no such charges against him , he has 7 more years to go on retirement , and if he becomes the IGP , with his entitlement to an extension in service for a further period of 5 years , he will be able to go on for 12 long years. Since an IGP serving for such a long period is un-befitting , it was finally decided by the CC to appoint Poojitha Jayasundara who is prone to exhibitionism as the IGP.
During the recent past Poojitha conducted a face book campaign which was unbecoming of his official status , yet the  CC did not take serious note of that ; it   had considered  that as a display of his unsuitability .
---------------------------

Wiggie To Meet Maithri And Ranil Over Illegal Land Grabbing In North


Colombo Telegraph
April 18, 2016
Chief Minister of the Northern Province C. V. Wigneswaran will meet with President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in Colombo today to discuss matters pertaining to the land issues in the Northern Province.
C.V. WigneswaranDuring the meeting, Wigneswaran will seek an assurance from both the President and the Prime Minister that the land in the north which belongs to civilians will not be taken by force for various government led development projects.
The meeting comes amidst reports that there are certain instances where land currently held by the military are to be used for development projects, instead of them being returned to the people.
“The land rightfully belongs to the Tamil civilians, but instead of giving them the land back, they are now trying to take the land by force for various development programmes. This land belongs to the people and it should be returned back to them, this is what the government promised,” an official from the Northern Provincial Council said.

Opposition Parties Must Support To Formulate New Constitution – Karunarathna Paranawithana

by Ashanthi Warunasuirya-Monday, April 18, 2016


Deputy Media Minister Karunarathna Paranawithana says parliament functioning as the constitutional assembly is the most suitable system for Sri Lanka in, and it has been carried out in accordance with the present Constitution. He requested the opposition parties and everyone to support to formulate a new Constitution for the country without confining to narrow political agendas.
Following are excerpts of the interview:-
Q:  How do you see the entire parliament working as a constitutional Assembly?

A: We decided at the beginning to involve the entire parliament to formulate a new Constitution. We decided on this method after discussing it in parliament. Accordingly on April five, the Constitutional Assembly convened and began the historic procedure of formulating a new Constitution for the country presided by its chairman Speaker Karu Jayasuriya. Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe holds the chairmanship of its task committee. This committee represents all parliamentary opposition parties and political fronts. They will formulate the fundamental draft and submit it to the Constitutional Assembly. The Assembly will debate, discuss and formulate the new Constitution. This is the most suitable system to formulate a new Constitution for the country.
Q: It is said that this system is not legal. What is your view on this claim?

A:  There are different views. Some say we cannot formulate a new Constitution in this way. But this system is constitutional. The present Constitution shows a system in this regard. No one denies it. A single party or government cannot bring in a new constitution. All must get together to formulate a new constitution. It cannot be done in haste as well. Such constitutions will bring in chaos or they are not long lasting. We also have experience of formation of constitutions. We have taken this path through our vast experience.
Q:  Public views and proposals are being considered in formulating a new constitution. But there are issues in getting public views. Different views were expressed in the recent past that this method will not be a success. What is your view on this claim?

A: People in our country do not submit their views that fast. They tend to be lazy in such matters. The committee to get public views visited every nook and corner in the country. They held awareness rallies in every district. The Media published them. Ads were published informing the public. There are groups whose main goal is to criticise. Chairman of the Constitutional Assembly Karu Jayasuriya recently stated that the assembly is open for the media. We will also launch a media committee. Then the entire procedure will be open to the public. At that point also, the public can submit their views. Thereafter, the new constitutional draft will be presented to parliament. In parliament too, public views can be presented through their parliamentary representatives. Saying that public views were not obtained properly and the committee in this regard did not go to some regions is a common weakness in the country. These are unfair criticisms.
Q:  What was the procedure to select ministers for the Constitutional Assembly?

A:  Electing members for the Constitutional Committee and its task committees was carried out in the recent past. Selection of MPs for committees was postponed to the next assembly date.
Q:  The issue of devolving power will eventually arise in this procedure. The Prime Minister stated recently that devolution of power will be carried out in equal terms. Accordingly, the Northern Province will receive equal power just like other provinces get. Will not this procedure create certain issues in the future?

A:  There are only two ways to devolve power: equal and unequal. After introducing Provincial Councils, they got equal power. We can discuss at the assembly if we are going to follow this system. We can also discuss the system of unequal power devolution and reach a consensus if we formulate what is needed in accordance with the 13 Amendment or go beyond 13A. Task committees have not formulated any draft to date. There are many views. We can reach consensus after discussing all these views in the assembly.
Q: People are in such a dire situation that they cannot celebrate this New Year. The prices of goods have gone up very much. Even the price of an egg is at Rs. 20. Festival advances and salaries have not been given. Really what is happening?

A:  Yes, the country is being economically challenged now. This government increased salaries by Rs. 10,000 as soon as they came to power. Former government did not grant any increment. Now there is a legally accepted basic salary. The increment of Rs. 2,500 has been added to that basic salary. So there is some livelihood improvement for government and private sector employees. We all can recall that those days no one was able to express ideas on such issues. Any one who spoke against the government was killed or jailed. Now those things do not happen. So the Media makes a loud noise even over a small matter. The government is carrying out many viable plans to bring down the cost of living. We have to celebrate the New Year amidst all these difficulties. If we can celebrate the New Year grandly and get away from all the other important things, it is good. But we cannot. We have to manage the entire economy proper and find solution for our burning issues.

Q:  Joint Opposition left the country to Geneva accusing that the government does not provide them with freedom but only accusations. Why does the government act in this way?

A:  We have to question them as to what injustice we have meted out to them. It is an utter lie to say that they are not allowed to speak in parliament. Parliament queried what party they represent in parliament. It is an issue in the opposition. They do not have to visit Geneva for not having enough time in parliament for them to express their views. Not only for speaking, but also for grinding chilies, smashing coconuts and every other thing, they have freedom. They go to Geneva and lose their baggage.  They need not visit Geneva because they can solve this in parliament by smashing a coconut and grinding a little amount of chilies.

Q:  How can they support in formulating a new constitution in this way?

A:  We request them to get away from all these jokes. If they want to make people laugh, it is ok. These things happen in any parliament and those are not reasons enough for agitations. We request them to extend their genuine support to formulate a new constitution. It is everyone’s responsibility to take part. So, we request them to work together with us leaving narrow political agendas aside.

Q: A suicide bomb jacket and a haul of explosives were found in the North. Underworld resurrects. Do not these events signal that the security of the country is in jeopardy?

A: Even though it seems underworld gangs are reemerging, actually they are surrendering. When Dematagoda Chaminda was shot dead, against whom steps are to be taken? By killing Chaminda, hearing of the relevant court case was prevented. It is understandable if it is government or an individual who killed Chaminda. We are alert to this ongoing situation. We do not use State terrorism to suppress underworld. The Police and country’s law achieve that end.
Yes, finding a suicide bomb jacket from the North is a major issue. But it also shows the sheer ability of the tri forcers to protect the country. There are groups who got elated hearing this news. A group exists that seek blood of Sinhala and Tamil people. They created fiction to rouse the public. They try to push the country towards a bloodbath. But the era of warriors and rationalist is over now.

What is sauce for the goose is not sauce for the gander?

The Sunday Times Sri Lanka
Sunday, April 17, 2016

There is a view taken by some who are engaged in the process of constitutional reform that a new or radically revised constitutional document for Sri Lanka will be the proverbial panacea for many if not all the country’s ills.
This is however dangerously misleading. The question is simple. If provisions of the existing Constitution, (including amendments with their warts and all) are not adhered to properly, what possible faith can citizens have in a new document, the beautiful gloss of which will be limited to the paper that it is printed on?

Government doing itself a disservice

This question becomes relevant in light of practice by the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe coalition government which directly contradicts its good governance rhetoric. As pointed out in these column spaces on many occasions, the standard at which observance of the Rule of Law ought to be measured is most emphatically not by comparison to the Rajapaksa years.

This is because, during the latter term of the Rajapaksa Presidency in particular, there was literally no standard to be measured against. Instead of the Rule of Law, the Rule of Political Patronage was in operation. So when this President and this Prime Minister pat themselves on the backs for being a tad better than their predecessor, this is no achievement to boast of.

And in that context, the Government does itself a great disservice when it fails to adhere to the Constitution. This is apparent at many levels. At the highest point, this question has arisen again in view of the pending appointment of the next Inspector General of Police. As in the case of the fracas over the appointment of the Attorney General, the nation is bemused over whether it is the President who chooses the potential appointee to the positions of Chief Justice, Attorney General, Inspector General of Police and a host of other key offices or whether it is the Constitutional Council (CC)?

Sauce for the goose but not for the gander

Where the Attorney General was concerned, a ludicrous situation arose when the CC refused to consider the three names sent by the President and referred the matter back to the President to send one name to the CC for consideration, to approve or refuse. Where the pending appointment of the Inspector General of Police is concerned, we are informed through media reports that the President has again sent three names to the CC. 

This time around, the CC has affirmed that it will interview the three officers recommended presumably with a view to making a choice. Why was this process not formally followed in the case of the appointment of the Attorney General? What is sauce for the goose certainly does not appear to be sauce for the gander, to take some liberties with that colloquialism, as one may be permitted to.

Whatever this may be, processes of appointment need to be transparent and accountable. It must resemble a solemn constitutional process rather than an unruly football game. As the Supreme Court pronounced in an authoritative cursus curiae from the early nineteen eighties onwards, accountability needs to be evidenced during the process.

This minimum rule applies to the Constitutional Council as well. Rules regulating its procedure need to be laid before the Parliament and approved. The constitutional requirements thereto have to be adhered to as a matter of urgent imperative. It is farcical that this body has been operating in this haphazard manner for well over half a year.

Why is the law not utilized?

Other examples abound where clear non-conformity with the Constitution is evidenced. Take the issue of religious freedom for instance. Does the existing Constitution permit attacks on places of worship of Sri Lanka’s religious minorities? No, it does not. The question then arises as to why and how these attacks continue to be carried out even after the change of regime in 2015.

The question is not the scale of the incidents which is widely acknowledged to have lessened to some extent after the Sirisena Presidency assumed office. The question rather is as to why the law is not utilized against those who attack places of worship. Without the Rule of Law being enforced, the issue of severity of attacks depends on the political variability of a particular administration which is certainly not a happy point of reliance.

It may be conceded that prophets of the new evangelical traditions have often distasteful ways of acting including engaging in monetarily induced conversions which gravely offend not only Buddhists but also Hindus, Muslims and adherents of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and Methodist churches in Sri Lanka. Yet the solution thereof is not attacks by sabre rattling monks or enraged villagers. Instead, there must a methodical evaluation of the legality of these institutions and action must be taken by and under the law.

Public officers themselves acting illegally

Currently, steps taken by the police and Divisional Secretaries do not conform to the law or to the Constitution. For instance, private religious gatherings have been stopped by public officers on the basis that permission must be obtained when more than ten persons are gathered for worship. In other instances, renovations of personal residences of priests have been resisted. Police complaints filed are not proceeded with.

Governmental circulars also add to the confusion. A 2008 circular decreed that future construction of any place of worship was subject to prior permission of the Buddha Sasana Ministry and with approval of the Divisional Secretary. Later, another circular, since then revoked, stated that this applies also to existing places of worship which were deemed illegal ‘unless approved by the Ministry.

Despite the important position afforded to Buddhism in the constitutional scheme through Article 9, Article 10 and Article 14 (e) on the freedom of thought and religion and to manifest and practice one’s religion demonstrate a constitutional commitment to religious tolerance. But of what use is an effort to fine tune these provisions when even the existing provisions regarding religious tolerance are not observed?
These are apt reflections in the Avurudu days.

Laggala police arms robbery that shocked the security chiefs ! A dissection following the arms seizur….

-A Defence Analyse

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 18.April.2016, 11.20PM) While the people were enjoying the New Year , a cache of robbed arms from  the main armory of Laggala police was seized at the right  time following the robbery. This incident had sent a wave of most rude shock among the security chiefs of the country.
On the 13 th New year night ,  a T56 weapon and five pistols were robbed after opening the chest of weapons but  leaving   back the chest ,of the Laggala police .However   the bullets which match the weapons had  not been  robbed. 
The  robbery had come  to light in the following morning. When the robbery took place , the night duty officer in charge , the officer in charge of the telephone system and  two officers assisting in the station’s  security had been at the police station. The chest  containing weapons had been opened using  the bunch of keys of the police , it was revealed.
The bunch of keys had been at a place most visible to the officer in charge of the telephone system. In that bunch of keys there were 17  keys in addition to that of  the chest  of weapons.
The officer in charge of the phones had seen an individual wearing a sarong along with a weapon going in the direction of the officer providing security at the front. 
Following the incident , the acting IGP entrusted the investigation to the CID. Based on what came to light , two security officers providing security to the  officer in charge during the night were interdicted.

What caught the attention most during investigations ……
Selecting the new year day for this robbery is most noteworthy. On that day the focus is on other activities and the police stations too are with minimum staff.  Besides this Laggala police station was inaugurated recently after refurbishment , and it is in a desolate place with no houses in the  vicinity .
 
That is perhaps why this station was chosen for the theft. Though the Laggala police station is housed in a huge building , in the night there had been only four police officers on duty .Except one officer who was awake the other three officers were drunk and had been sleeping. The thief had perhaps taken these  into consideration . However , since the investigators arrived the following day , the inebriated condition of the officers could not be subjected to a medical examination.
 
The fact that the thief had selected the correct key of the bunch of 17 keys to open the chest of weapons suggests that the rogue is from within the police. On the other hand if the key used was one made identical with the police key , then again that could be done only by somebody with the collusion  of an officer within the police station. 
The OIC of Laggala police station O.N.J.W. K. Amarasinghe CI had some time ago reported to the higher ups that since there are a number of officers in the Laggala police station who are long standing ancestral residents of Laggala , and owing to this difficulties are experienced when enforcing the law. He had therefore wanted them transferred out .
The OIC had made this complaint  because when issues crop up in the areas where  those officers are from , the latter had made it a habit owing to their close friendship with the accused to ‘shape up’ the crime without duly enforcing the law.  The same is true  when poachers and others  who destroy  the forests are caught .On the day of this incident too , such an officer of the village has been on duty .Among the three officers interdicted is this   officer.
The attention was also specially  focused on the robbery of the firearms only ,without laying hands on the bullets .To every bullet that is with the security division , there is a number. Hence , if any incident had occurred owing to the bullets , via that number it can be trapped.  This means that the robbers are aware of this fact , and did not therefore rob them , or the robbers have the bullets already with them or they know some other  method by which they can get them .
The weapons were detected 16th morning …….
In the morning , when the chief incumbent of the Sandagala temple,Wellegama, Pallegama which is situated about 12 kilometers away from the Laggala police station, went near the well to do his morning face wash, he had seen a bag close to  the water tank some distance away from the bucket . The Ven .Thera who saw a T 56 rifle and five pistols in the bag had summoned the villagers , and informed the Laggala police via  emergency phone No. 119.  The police who arrived had identified the arms as belonging to the Laggala police which were robbed.

The CID had by now handed over  the arms to the government analyst and the Finger prints registrar to check whether those weapons had been used for any firing, and to identify finger prints. 
After  the discovery of the weapons , the attention of the investigators had been drawn to the following …
It is clear the police are involved. Investigations are under way to determine whether these are officers now working  in the Laggala police or those who were there and  now transferred  out.
It is suspected that the rogues after realizing they cannot  proceed with the robbery or that is not necessary , had left the weapons within eyeshot distance of the temple prelate for him to see.  This is a reasonable inference  because the bag was  clearly visible  to the prelate who went to the well for washing. 
If the  aim was not to rob the weapons or to use them , it should be to  disgrace the police . 
Investigations have also turned in the direction to ascertain whether any rival of the acting IGP who is also vying for the post of the IGP after the former IGP’s retirement, conspired to  orchestrate this in order to portray that the acting IGP is incompetent for the IGP position. One of those vying for the IGP post now was a DIG in charge of this area earlier on. 
The investigators are also probing ,when the robbery was initiated  ,whether  any political group was through this  seeking to  collect arms with a view to destroying  the weapon power since , each time insurgency in the country erupted in the South , arms gathering was carried our prior, based on reports .But with the detection of these robbed arms , this line of investigation  can go no further.Besides , if there is such a political group  robbing arms , surely they will not abandon the arms. Even an underworld gang that robs arms will not surrender them .
In the circumstances , when the aforementioned possibilities are ruled out , it has become increasingly clear the robbery of arms at the Laggala police station is a result of a conspiracy from within the police itself. 
No matter what , there is a most important and indispensable lesson the Sri Lanka police have to learn following this robbery . 
Currently , even in a Kotthu roti kiosk , there is a CCTV  camera system , then why not in a police station ?  CCTV cameras are available at prices even lesser than Rs. 50,000.00 in Sri Lanka . Therefore this is a clear index more than the financial aspect it is  simply  the gross indifference to priorities and utter unconcern for matters of national importance that have paved the way for  this robbery .
By Lanka e news defense reporter 
Translated by Jeff
---------------------------
by     (2016-04-18 18:04:14)

Will the Drug Regulatory Commission & the health minister clash?

Will the Drug Regulatory Commission & the health minister clash?

Apr 18, 2016
Health minister Rajitha Senaratne recently gave a lecture for more than half an hour to the chairman and the deputy chairman of the Drug Regulatory Commission over the steep increase in the prices of pharmaceutical drugs.

The minister accused chairman Prof. Jayantha Jayasuriya and deputy chairman Prof. Krishantha Weerasuriya of being responsible for the rising prices of drugs.
Persons linked to the health sector told us that the main reason for the increases is the depreciation of the rupee against the US dollar.
Also, the computation formula for imported goods with regard to pharmaceutical drugs is at a high level. As a result, the public has to buy a drug at 180 per cent of its actual price, say informed sources in the health sector.
Some time ago, the health minister demanded the chairman and the deputy chairman of the Drug Regulatory Commission to resign, and they consented. At the time, the media reported the drug mafia, which was getting drugs at experimental level registered, was behind their resignations. However, the president mediated and reinstated the two officials.

Purity Of Blood, Symbolism & Divide And Rule


Colombo Telegraph
By Harendra de Silva –April 18, 2016 
Prof. Harendra De Silva
Prof. Harendra De Silva
Open ethnic and religious sentiments such as Sinha-le (blood of the lion/Sinhala) have become fashionable in Sri Lanka with slogans across windscreens usually among the lower social groups such as three wheeler drivers who are bold enough to display the fashion! Are these people a majority who are Buddhists commited with deep convictions or are they displaying their ignorance? Do they even understand one stanza of the great philosophy of Buddhism? The upper strata except for a few are not that bold or are not convinced of the radical movement. However, prominent display of Buddha or Christian statues on dashboards, quotes from the Quoran across windscreens, or crosses hanging from mirrors reflect inner feelings of each group. I believe for most, it is an innocent action of bringing blessings or good luck from these religious symbols rather than being extremist or racist! A vehicle is accident prone and sometimes it’s lethal to occupants and needs supernatural powers to save them rather than drive carefully or obey laws!! One of my friends said that his Wife believes that the husband cannot resort to any vices (?except alcohol) in a holy environment of the car! or does it apply for the wife as well?
I suppose school colours or court of arms also reflect the clannish feelings. Others although not ‘racist’, (including politicians) favour the ‘religion ‘of the ‘college flag’ when giving appointments. For a few, covert ways of identifying clan members as happens in the West is by using “Gang symbols”. Haircuts, beards, ‘fish symbol’, attire, body language and jargon and distinguish members from outsiders and convey the clan in a subtle way maybe with a sense of moral superiority.
However, the right to worship and having statues, crosses, “budhu geys“ (domestic place of worship) at home is a right of a person, which should be considered private. One’s commitment to a religion should be the understanding of religious priniciples, the conscience of the practice of the religion in terms of correct attitudes and behaviour in society and home.
By discussing this highly controversial topic, I am likely/may offend many of all faiths and maybe it may be like opening a can of worms! I have anyway had a history of stirring hornet’s nests in the past, eg. the subject of child abuse and abuse in child conscription! However, in the absence of White vans today I am not reluctant to divulge my identity!
                          Read More

logoTuesday, 19 April 2016
Sri Lanka is on the brink of a historic moment. Following a long struggle spanning over a decade, a Bill on the Right to Information (RTI) was tabled in the Sri Lankan parliament on 24 March. According to ARTICLE 19, an international organisation working on free speech, the current version of the Bill has been hailed as one of the best in the world. The Sri Lankan public and civil society are thus keen to see its passage.

Once enacted, the new RTI law will enable citizens to access information held by public authorities. Any citizen could submit an RTI request to the relevant authority and receive information free of charge. Moreover, an information request cannot be refused if the public interest in the disclosure outweighs any perceived harm.  The new law thus promises to advance public accountability and combat corruption—two major platforms on which the current Government was elected.

Meanwhile, another protracted struggle for information continues to take place in Sri Lanka. Thousands of families have endured indescribable grief and indignity throughout the country’s history of enforced disappearances. 

"If there is one experience that tragically unites Sri Lankans across ethnicity and geography, it is the trauma of not knowing the whereabouts of a missing relative. Despite its obvious merits, the current RTI Bill is unconscious of the deep conceptual relevance of RTI to the issue of enforced disappearance"

BUP_DFTDFT-13-Gehan

An insurrection in Sri Lanka’s south during the late 1980s saw the disappearance of thousands people. The recently concluded civil war in the north and east similarly witnessed the disappearance of thousands more. In the latter case, many disappeared after surrendering to security forces.

The Commission of Inquiry headed by Maxwell Paranagama, which was appointed in 2013 to inquire into complaints of missing persons, received over 24,000 complaints. Five thousand of these complaints were made by the families of military personnel missing in action. If there is one experience that tragically unites Sri Lankans across ethnicity and geography, it is the trauma of not knowing the whereabouts of a missing relative.

Despite its obvious merits, the current RTI Bill is unconscious of the deep conceptual relevance of RTI to the issue of enforced disappearance. Oblivious to this relevance, section 25(3) of the Bill provides: ‘Where the request for information concerns the life and personal liberty of the citizen making such request, the response to it shall be made within forty-eight hours’ (emphasis added). Thus a citizen can seek an expedited response to an information request only if it applies to her own life and liberty. But this right does not extend to information that concerns the life and liberty of someone else—a missing relative perhaps.

Cynics might insist that in any event a standard RTI request is unlikely to help a family obtain information on a missing relative. Instead, an Office of Missing Persons, once established, could provide such information. Yet, should we not feel some discomfort with the fact that Sri Lanka’s national discourse on RTI fails to engage the community that needs this right the most?

Sri Lanka’s RTI campaign has carefully avoided an association with enforced disappearances—perhaps out of a sense of political expediency. Linking the campaign to a deeply-contentious issue may have ultimately undermined it. Yet can a campaign that seeks to overcome a culture of secrecy disregard one of the most infamous ‘secrets’ in the country? The irony of failing to invite such introspection is not lost on this RTI advocate.

The families of those missing are accustomed to being pushed to the margins. The total absence of public spaces to commemorate the disappeared certainly reflects such marginalisation. Despite repeated calls for public memorials, these families have only an unofficial site on the wayside in Seeduwa to remember their missing loved ones. They will not be surprised by the current RTI Bill’s insensitivity to their cause. It is just a cruel reminder of their reality.

Nevertheless, it is not too late to restore the integrity of the national discourse on RTI in Sri Lanka. The Bill is now in the hands of our Parliamentarians. They can still move to revise Section 25(3) of the Bill to ensure that there is an expedited response to requests concerning the life and liberty of any person, and not merely of the applicant.

RTI advocates must lobby this revision, which at least acknowledges the relevance of the disappeared to Sri Lanka’s demand for RTI. Such acknowledgement could finally end the deep disconnect between the clarion call for more information and the lived experience of its deprivation.

[Gehan Gunatilleke is a lawyer based in Colombo, Sri Lanka, and the Research Director of Verité Research. He is the author of ‘The Right to Information in Sri Lanka: A Guide for Advocates’ (Sri Lanka Press Institute/UNESCO: 2014).]
Will not allow taxes that adversely affect 

public – President

Will not allow taxes that adversely affect public – President

logoApril 18, 2016 
I will not allow any taxation that will affect the general public in an adverse way, President Maithripala Sirisena said today. He added that no matter what economic analysts suggest the public interests must be safeguarded.  

The President made these comments at a function in Polonnaruwa. If there are any economists who do not think of the public wellbeing they are welcome to leave their jobs and go, President claimed.


The campaign for Presidential election


Coat of arms of Sri Lanka, showing a lion holding a sword in its right forepaw surrounded by a ring made from blue lotus petals which is placed on top of a grain vase sprouting rice grains to encircle it. A Dharmacakra is on the top while a sun and moon are at the bottom on each side of the vase.
Rajiva Wijesinha-2016-04-19

If the preparation of the manifesto was chaotic, I was also startled about the chaos that seemed to reign at the United National Party (UNP) office. There seemed much confusion about the way meetings would be organized and how a spread of speakers would be found for all of them. All this has been described however by Asoka in the book he brought out a couple of months after the election, and he shows how, despite the initial problems, the campaign settled down into something reasonably efficient.

Mahinda Rajapaksa contributed to this by luring away the General Secretary of the UNP, Tissa Attanayake. He was replaced by Kabir Hashim who applied himself with dedication to the campaign, and ensured that public meetings were effective. The President would have done better to have allowed Attanayake to stay on in the UNP for, even without actually engaging in sabotage, he would have achieved nothing like what Kabir, working closely with other individuals and parties, managed to do. Ironically, the main charge made against the former President soon after he lost the election was that he had bribed Attanayake to cross over by making him a minister.

I have never seen myself as a platform speaker, and my principal contribution to the campaign was through articles in the papers plus some television appearances. I made sure that the descriptions of all Seven Dwarfs appeared in one paper or website or another, my main outlet being Ceylon Today. That was owned by Tiran Alles, who was supportive of the President, but the paper was given a free hand and had over the previous year published much of my criticism of the way the government was functioning.

Postal voting
I did speak at a couple of meetings in the North however, since there were few speakers familiar with the area who went up for the meetings in the district capitals. And I also went up to monitor the postal voting, for I realized that nothing had been arranged about that by the campaign office. It had been decided early on that this should be done since we felt that public servants were likely to vote for Maithripala but they might be subject to pressures. This was more than likely to be the case with the forces, whereas there too we anticipated more support than the government imagined.

The day before the voting however, I found that nothing had been arranged for the North, so I volunteered to go up myself and persuaded Vasantha too to accompany me. The UNP sent a couple of youngsters to accompany us and the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) arranged for a couple of lawyers from Jaffna too to meet us there and go with us to the various polling stations. It was good to have them around, but they were not especially familiar with the areas we had to go to, and in the end Vasantha and I had to decide on arrangements pretty much by ourselves.

As it turned out however, there was no need to worry for there were no signs of any problems anywhere. We were also heartened by the warm welcome we received practically everywhere, not only from the people of the area, but also from many members of the forces. The sentry at one of the navy camps was almost ecstatic when he found out that we were supporting the opposition candidate, which was most heartening. It was also nice to see some of my former students from the Military Academy now senior enough to act as Returning Officers for the poll.

LTTE stooge
On my second visit to the North I renewed acquaintance with the Bishop of Mannar, who I had got along with well even though some in the government had seen him as a stooge of the LTTE while the war was on. At my first meeting with him however, while critical of what he saw as government excesses, he had also been harsh about the LTTE, though clutching my hand at the end to say that I should not reveal anything of that publicly.

On this occasion he seemed very pleased to see me, and before the rest came – as usual the main speakers including the President were running late – I addressed the clergy, some of whom I knew from the Divisional Reconciliation meetings where they had been generally most helpful. It was interesting too to see the Bishop dealing with Rishard Bathiudeen, who had by this stage come over to the opposition side.

Earlier it had been indicated that he would not be welcome at Bishop's House, for there had been bitter animosity between him and the Bishop over the preceding years. But Rishard turned up and the Bishop was suitably gracious.
All this, as well as the ecstatic crowd in Jaffna, seemed to bode well for the campaign. But there were still worries about the lack of support from the old Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP). Asoka Abeygunawardena has written about this at length, and also mentioned my own role in what I think was the last attempt to get someone over.

UPFA campaign

This was Dayasiri Jayasekara, who had in fact crossed over from the UNP the previous year in order to head the UPFA campaign for the Wayamba Provincial Council. He had done extremely well, and was now Chief Minister of the Province. He had however come into politics initially through the SLFP, being one of the bright youngsters whom G. L. Pieris had taken onto his staff when, having resigned from the position of Vice-Chancellor of Colombo University, he went into politics.

He had joined G. L. in the UNP when the latter had crossed over to bring down Chandrika Kumaratunga's government at the end of 2001, but he had then remained there and was seen as one of its brightest prospects. But he felt he had not been treated well by Ranil Wickremesinghe, so he had joined the United People's Freedom Alliance (UPFA), and received solid support from its old leadership during the Provincial Council election. This was because his internal rival for the post of Chief Minister was the son of someone else who had crossed over from the UNP and was seen as one of those who was a malign influence on the President.
I was rung up early morning on 1 January when I was on my way back from the Jaffna trip (I had spent New Year's eve with my aunt Ena de Silva at Aluwihare after the trip to Jaffna). It was Karu Paranavitane whom I had known as a bright young SLFP stalwart. He had been appointed to the Rupavahini Corporation as Director General, and done his best to promote a pluralistic outlook, but had made little headway against the chauvinists who dominated the place.

Collection of poetry
The President had then sent him as Consul General to Canada, where he had helped with the launch of my collection of Sri Lankan poetry, Sinhalese and Tamil and English, which the National Book Trust of India had published under the title Mirrored Images. Not surprisingly, he had been one of the first to support Maithripala Sirisena, and was seen as a close confidante.
I met him at Maithripala's residence and he told me that Dayasiri was willing to join the campaign but wanted a seat in Parliament afterwards. I was asked if I was willing to resign to create a vacancy. He said Maithripala had been hesitant about asking me since it would be a great sacrifice, but I had no hesitation in agreeing, because I too thought it vital to get someone else over from the SLFP. This was not only to boost the campaign, but to work towards a coalition government if Maithripala won, not one dominated by the UNP.

Karu was profuse in his thanks and said what he termed was my willing sacrifice would not be forgotten. I told him that I made no conditions, but in case Maithripala won, I hoped that I would be able to work in education. The manifesto indicated – without my having suggested it - that the Cabinet of the new President would consist of representatives of all political parties in Parliament, so I assumed I would be part of it.

Commitment
That promise was not kept, and I do not suppose Karu reminded the President about it later. Perhaps it was felt that, since Dayasiri changed his mind, the matter could be forgotten. I was touched therefore that Asoka mentioned it so appreciatively in his book – "Karu Paranavithana spoke to Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha and he agreed to step down from the national list to make way for Dayasiri. Here I would like to honourably mention the commitment of the new State Minister for Eduction Dr. Rajiva Wijesinhge in this matter."

When the country went to the polls on 8 January Maithripala Sirisena won quite comfortably, including in several districts where the Sinhalese were in the majority. This made it clear that it was not only because of the minorities that the incumbent had been defeated. After results in favour of Maithripala began flowing in early morning on 9 January there was a hiatus and all sorts of rumours spread, that Mahinda Rajapaksa was seeking a way of subverting the result. Unfortunately, the incumbent Chief Justice was with him at the time, and it was claimed that he had advised on a possible strategy to prevent the new President being declared elected. Whether or not this was true, and it was other officials who held the line, cannot be said for certain.

Misunderstandings
I know that the former Army Commander, by then Chief of the General Staff, came to see me a few days later to indicate how misunderstandings had arisen, whereas his point was that nothing sinister had been planned, the incumbent President had simply wanted to ensure that there would be no violence or humiliation when the results were announced. For that purpose Ranil had been called to President's House and, with the required assurances given, Mahinda left for his home down south and Maithripala Sirisena was declared elected President.

Dhammika’s appointment as port chief against the law!

Dhammika’s appointment as port chief against the law!
Apr 18, 2016
Trade unions allege port minister Arjuna Ranatunga has appointed his elder brother Dhammika as chairman of the Ports Authority in total breach of the SLPA act.
The port TUs alliance made representations in this regard to the prime minister during a recent meeting.
Following the discussion on April 11, the TUs abandoned their fast and strike over the curtailment of their bonus and several other demands, but they stressed that their fight against the chairman would continue until he was removed.
They brought four matters to the attention of the PM, who was surprised to learn them, reports say.
How SLPA act was breached
They are - as per the SLPA act of 1979, the subject minister should appoint a chairman and four directors for the SLPA.
The minister should be satisfied with the port development, legal, financial, maritime, commerce, engineering, administrative or labour relation skills and experience of the person to be appointed the chairman.
Since the adoption of the act, the SLPA chairman had been a graduate, lawyer, engineer, medical doctor or an experienced administrator.
That was the case from the first chairman Wimal Amarasekara to Dr. Lakdas Panagoda, the Ranatunga-appointee in the 100-day government.

Not even basic qualifications
However, Dhammika is without even the basic qualifications to head the SLPA, despite his appointment last September.
He has studied science for his A/L, but does not have at least an external degree to his credit, or any other professional qualification.
After representing Sri Lanka as a cricketer, he became Sri Lanka CEO with the courtesy of Thilanga Sumathipala, but has not held an administrative position in any recognized institution.

US citizen
After leaving Sri Lanka and becoming a US citizen, he has worked at several vehicle sale institutions in the US.
He has applied for dual citizenship, but not yet been able to gain it.
Despite a request by the parliamentary committee on top positions for his revenue reports and educational certificates, he has not submitted them for perusal.
Warned by courts
Meanwhile, Dhammika has been severely warned by Colombo chief magistrate Gihan Pilapitiya and released on two sureties of Rs. 100,000 each, after being produced before courts on a charge of threatening a journalist covering a court case.
The magistrate said that going by his conduct at a court of law, he could imagine how lowly Dhammika would behave at the SLPA.
- SLM -