Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Almost 6,000 refugee children went missing last year, says Germany

Interior ministry figures highlight growing concerns that criminals are preying on young people arriving in Europe
 
Refugees from Syria arriving at the Friedland shelter near Göttingen, central Germany. Photograph: Swen Pfoertner/AFP/Getty Images
 Children play at a makeshift refugee camp in the village of Idomeni, northern Greece. Thousands of refugees are stuck in Greece. Photograph: Valdrin Xhemaj/EPA

 in Berlin andTuesday 12 April 2016 

Almost 6,000 refugee children and minors were reported missing in Germany last year, according to its interior ministry, amid growing concerns that traffickers and criminals are preying on thousands of vulnerable young people travelling amid the flow of refugees into Europe.

The exact scale of the crisis is unclear, because rudimentary and overwhelmed registration systems mean Europe does not have a clear picture of the number of children arriving on its shores, or close tracking of their onward route.

Some of those who vanish may never have registered, paranoid that officials will lock them up. Others may have been reunited with families and not told local officials. But there is little question that others have fallen into the hands of traffickers, and thousands more are at risk from criminals.

European Union estimates that at least 10,000 child refugees had disappearedafter arriving in the continent were “very likely to be underestimated”, a senior official at Unicef warned on the day the German numbers were released.

“The thing is, they are invisible, that’s the very reason why [they are vulnerable] – if children aren’t counted, they don’t count,” said Sarah Crowe, Unicef’s global spokesperson on the European and refugee and migrant crisis. “Different states need to know who is in their country and take care of them.”

Germany’s interior ministry also admitted its estimate could be too low. Authorities are taking the situation “very seriously”, but cases are hard to follow due to the lack of central data collection, spokesman Johannes Dimroth said.

Most of the children who have been identified as missing came from Syria, Afghanistan, Eritrea, Morocco and Algeria, the ministry said, and about 550 of them were under 14.

Overall, 95,000 children who were not accompanied by an adult or had been separated from their families had sought asylum in the EU last year, the majority of them in Germany and Sweden, Crowe said.

At least 2,000 more unaccompanied children are thought to be stranded in Greece, some already sleeping on the streets, after the overland trail towards western Europe was closed.

“Of course those who are unaccompanied are more likely to be vulnerable to traffickers … during this process where they do not have the right language, they do not have access to information, they will be preyed upon,” Crowe said.

At the end of March, a group of MEPs warned European governments that underage refugees were so unprotected they were in danger of falling victim to pan-European bands of criminals who could exploit them for prostitution, slavery, or trafficking in drugs or human organs.

The German interior ministry said the government has no evidence that underage refugees are being exploited in the country.

But experts at Unicef said part of the challenge with tackling exploitation of refugee children is that authorities still have very little understanding of who is targeting them, or where trafficked young people might end up.

“We know that thousands and thousands of children are simply unaccounted for, and the most horrifying thing of all is that we just have no idea where they are or what’s happening to them, and it’s that complete absence of information that should terrify us the most,” said Lily Caprani, the deputy executive director of Unicef UK.

She said existing trafficking routes sent victims into the sex industry, drugs trade and domestic servitude, but that the scale of the refugee crisis might transform criminal networks.

“The opportunity for people traffickers that the European refugee crisis has presented has probably disrupted this completely, and we’ll probably see new patterns emerging,” she said.

Responsibility for tackling trafficking must be shared across Europe, she added, because even countries that are not receiving large numbers of refugees may be destinations for children trapped by criminal networks in other places.

“Although we don’t see thousands and thousands of refugees arriving in the UK on our soil, there is no doubt at all that we have an issue with children being trafficked in the UK,” Caprani said.

There are also worries that children could become more vulnerable to death at sea, if the effective closure of the route across the Aegean from Turkey to Greece means trafficking shifts towards more dangerous routes, such as from Libya to Italy, Crowe said.

“Because of the EU-Turkey deal, people may start to take other routes, more dangerous routes,” she said, pointing out that lots of children drowned in the Aegean in the summer. “And of course the central Mediterranean is even more dangerous, because it is a larger sea.”

The figures in Germany emerged soon after a Red Cross worker helped bring one report of a missing child to a rare happy ending.

Rani Hijazi found the 10-year-old boy from Afghanistan after months of searching, and arranged for him to be reunited with his parents and siblings. They had been separated on the voyage from Turkey to Greece, and the rest of the family had travelled on to Germany mourning a son they thought had been lost at sea.

Yellow fever spreads to DR Congo, kills 21


People wait in line to receive a yellow fever vaccine in Luanda, Angola (15 February 2016)Yellow fever has taken a heavy toll in Angola

BBC12 April 2016
An outbreak of yellow fever has killed 21 people in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the World Health Organization (WHO) says, linking some cases to an outbreak in neighbouring Angola.

In a statement, the WHO said the deaths had occurred in January to March, with 151 suspected cases recorded.

There was, it said, a "serious risk of further spread of the disease" in DRC.

The acute, mosquito-borne viral disease has killed 225 people in Angola and infected about 1,600 there.
The WHO said the DRC health authorities had set up a national committee to respond to the outbreak, including "screening and sanitary controls" on the country's borders.

A researcher holds a container of female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes
It is thought that Aedes aegypti mosquitoes are key yellow fever carriers

People travelling to Angola will now be vaccinated against the disease, it added.

The WHO statement says that the DRC's health ministry has in addition activated a contingency plan which includes more community engagement to fight the disease and better training of health workers.
Map
Yellow fever is a virus that can cause bleeding, jaundice and kidney failure, It is spread by mosquitoes, usually the Aedes aegypti mosquito, the same species that spreads the Zika virus.
It is endemic in tropical regions of Africa and South America.

A vaccine can prevent infection but there is no specific drug treatment for people who are infected.

Monday, April 11, 2016

Sri Lanka relaunches controversial Sinhala settlement scheme in North-East
Sri Lanka colonisation of Tamil Homeland

 11 April 2016
The Sri Lankan government has opened a new village in the Tamil North-East of the island, as part of a revival of a controversial Sinhala colonisation program. 

The ‘Village Reawakening’ program was declared open by Sri Lanka’s Minister of Housing and Construction Sajith Premadasa at Weli Oya today. Houses were constructed on land gifted to villagers by the Sri Lankan government and with loans provided at concessionary rates of interest.

The scheme is an apparent relaunch of a program started by Mr Premadasa’s father, former president Ranasinghe Premadasa. Weli Oya has been the site of a Sri Lankan government orchestrated project for decades, where Sinhala farmers from the South were settled to the North-East. 

Last year the army declared open a community hall, built for a Sinhala military village at the village in Mullaitivu. 

In October, Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena stated that he backed the project, which was also continued by his predecessor Mahinda Rajapaksa, and that he hoped to complete other similar projects during his tenure. 

See our earlier posts: 

Army constructs community hall for Sinhala military village in North-East (28 Oct 2015) 

Mullaitivu villagers protest against Sinhala colonisation (19 Jan 2016) 

Sri Lankan president pays tribute to UNP minister (25 Oct 2015) 

Rajapaksa hands over 3000 land deeds to Mahaweli farmers (22 Apr 2013)

Five Necessary Transformations & The Legacy Of Madam Bandaranaike


By Jehan Perera –April 11, 2016
Jehan Perera
Jehan Perera
Colombo TelegraphThe statesmanlike speech delivered extempore by President Maithripala Sirisena at the commemoration of former Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike’s 100th birth anniversary on April 7 brought out at least five areas of transformation that the country continues to go through. The president who was the chief guest at the ceremony began his speech with an appreciation of Madam Bandaranaike’s late husband SWRD Bandaranaike who preceded her as the country’s prime minister. The president noted that Prime Minister SWRD Bandaranaike had given political expression to the social forces that existed in the country at that time but which did not yet have their due representation in the polity. They became known as the Pancha Maha Balavegaya – the five great forces of the Buddhist clergy, the workers, the traditional ayurvedic physicians, the teachers, and the farmers — who were in the vanguard of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party’s historic victory back in 1956.
Sirima
Sirima

President Sirisena’s extraordinary value to the government and to political stability at the present time is his ability to moderate these social forces that his predecessor former President Mahinda Rajapaksa harnessed to the cause of Sinhala nationalism. The backsliding that has been taking place in regard to some of the commitments made by the new government, such as in the case of the Geneva resolution, may cause frustration to sections of the liberal Sri Lankan polity, and to the international community. However, when the president seemingly contradicts his own government’s commitments on the matter of international participation of judges, prosecutors and investigators in the envisaged investigations into war crimes committed by the Sri Lankan military, it is likely that he is being conscious of the present political realities and their volcanic potentials that led to the assassination of Prime Minister SWRD Bandaranaike in 1958.
The president’s second observation was that in a similar manner to her husband’s recognition of the social forces within the country, Madam Bandaranaike gave expression to the aspirations of large numbers of countries that were seeking to emerge from the thrall of colonialism that had oppressed and confined them ideologically and economically. The pinnacle of her achievement came in 1976 when the 5th Summit of Nonaligned Countries was held in Colombo. Prime Minister Sirmavo Bandaranaike chaired the Summit which was attended by 86 countries and was widely considered as a diplomatic triumph of Sri Lanka. The Colombo Summit was significant in that it paved the way for the emergence of a new economic order which had became a focal point of the Nonaligned Movement and helped advance the de-colonization process around the world.
Tamils in Jaffna protest against Sri Lankan military land grabs

11 April 2016
Protestors staged a sit in at the Jaffna Government Agent District Secretariat office in Jaffna today, demanding the Sri Lankan military halt ongoing land surveys.

More to follow.
Where is the TNA-led Main Opposition ?

2016-04-12
t has been a long time since we last heard from the Opposition, I mean the TNA-led main Opposition. Even when there are occasional isolated voices, such as by the National List MP M.A. Sumanthiran, they too appear to be too little, too late.  Last time the Opposition Leader Rasavarodhayam Sampanthan spoke out was several months back,  about the release of Tamil inmates incarcerated under terrorism related charges, that too was after a hunger strike launched by the prisoners. Recently, MP Sumanthiran raised concerns over the tender procedure adopted for the construction of 65,000 houses for the war-affected families in the North-East. His remarks (though belated) follow similar concerns raised by the local construction industry, civil society and even the Northern Chief Minister C. Wigneswaran.
They all  noted the lopsided tender procedures, which have favoured the Indian multinational Arcelor Mittal at the expense of local construction companies, concerns over inflated prices of the housing units and the absence of secondary benefits to the local communities. MP Sumanthiran has echoed those concerns.
But,  it is rather unusual for the TNA to take so long to raise a matter which has acute implications for its constituency in the North.
When Sampanthan was nominated the Opposition Leader, it was argued that given the nature of TNA’s primary constituency,  ethnic politics would take precedence over national politics. Now, it seems, perhaps, in order to assuage those concerns, the TNA has decided not to talk at all.
It has been keeping mum on the national issues, with which it still finds hard to relate and has toned down its previous rhetoric on Tamil interests to a near inaudible level.
 There is an explanation for this conduct. In the first place, their numbers (16 MPs from TNA plus 4 from JVP) do not add much clout to the main Opposition. After all, Sampanthan and Anura Kumara Dissanayake were nominated to the posts of Opposition Leader and the Chief Opposition Whip respectively with the tacit backing of the government.  Perhaps, they do not want to upset the apple cart too soon.  

SRI LANKA RTI BILL: RIGHTS PETITIONS ( ATTACHED) FILED BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT

sri-lanka-supreme-court

Sri Lanka Brief
11/04/2016
(SLB) Last week Supreme Court of Sri Lanka heard number of cases filed in relation to  the  Sri Lanka’s Right to Information Bill which has been tabled in the parliament.  Earlier   3 petitions were filed against the bill on the ground that right to information will jeopardise the national security. In response to those petitions leading civil society activists filled petitions in defense of the bill.
Supreme Court heard the cases on 08th and 09th of April. Informed sources say that the SC determinationalready has been sent to the speaker of the parliament.
The petitions filed; A summary:
RTI pettions April 2016
For the record SLB is publishing all the petitions filed in relation to the Sri Lanka’s first RTI bill.

Sri Lanka’s constitutional ‘house of cards’

The Sunday Times Sri LankaSunday, April 10, 2016

From a strategic point of view, it was a great sleight of hand for this Government to have successfully ‘packaged’ the 19th Amendment to the Constitution as a notable constitutional gain for Sri Lanka, despite its many problematic provisions.

Some of these seemingly progressive but actually deadening provisions include bringing back the 17th Amendment’s Constitutional Council (CC) but without its majority of independent members. The failure of the current politically constituted CC to announce transparent procedures regarding the nomination of persons to constitutional commissions and key posts is a case in point. The 19th Amendment’s inclusion of a retarded Right to Information clause which is directly at odds with the Right to Information Bill is another illustration.

Frolicsome antics of the animal kind

Also unacceptable is a crafty constitutional allowance permitting a bloated number of ministers under the euphemism of a ‘national government.’ Lest we forget, this was exactly the criticism that was leveled against the Rajapaksa regime, without the convenient cover of a ‘national government’ at the time.

This week, parliamentarians screeched, hooted and jeered at each other on the floor of the House over the scandalous increase of ministers, deputy ministers and state to ninety two. Unblushingly stubborn in the face of the unseemly fracas, the ‘yahapalanaya’ (good governance) Government announced that it had room for still more. These frolicsome antics more worthy of the animal kind were ironically evidenced at the very same time that a Code of Conduct was announced for parliamentarians.

Further, we were told that increased allowances and other perks for parliamentarians, which had earlier been abandoned in the face of mounting public anger, may be brought back again. And President Maithripala Sirisena defiantly justified an astronomical sum of public funds being expended for a farmers conference a few days ago on the basis that the farmers deserve it.

In the meantime even as the Government furiously backtracked on China funded development projects which they had earlier railed against, the Prime Minister and his team traipsed to Beijing to avert the economic crisis threatening the country. Indeed, one is hard put to laugh or to cry at these sorry happenings. If we are in such dire straits, should not the Government set the first example by a leaner Cabinet and less extravagance? Is this not basic commonsense?

Both parties are the bane of the country

So it is now getting to be clearer as to why the ‘national government’ was formed. Instead of one party robbing the country blind as has customarily been the case, we now have all hands in the national till. Popular singer Sunil Perera’s indictment that Sri Lanka’s two main parties, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) and the United National Party (UNP) have been the bane of the country is receiving wide popular acclaim. Ordinary Sri Lankans are viewing parliamentarians on both sides of the divide with considerable fury. And to be clear, this stinging accusation encompasses the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) as well. The JVP’s hypocritical contortions limited to blistering speeches critical of the Government and media shows will certainly not increase its dwindling voter base.

Slowly and surely it is now becoming apparent that Sri Lanka’s democratic collapse is of a more ingrained nature than purely attributable to the Rajapaksa decade. Though this may be convenient for many to peddle as their favorite topic of conversation, the reality is far more unpalatable. By the time that Mahinda Rajapaksa came to sit on the chair of the Executive Presidency, Sri Lanka’s democratic systems and constitutional structures had already been seriously undermined. The judicial system had been irreversibly politicized. It was a precarious house of cards, waiting for a slight jolt to bring the entire structure crashing down. This is precisely what happened under the Rajapaksa Presidency.

Undermined by decades of apathy

And that particular end result was enabled by the sheep-like quality of the country’s ‘intellectual’ polity whose capacity to independently critique and interrogate had been undermined by years of apathy and (quite literally) open mouthed bewilderment as systems and institutions rotted away. I remember an infuriating conversation years ago when an academic opined that the independence of the office of Sri Lanka’s Chief Justice and of the judicial institution was solely a matter to be agitated for by the Bar. This was not the province of the wider legal community, it was observed in wide-eyed seriousness.

Culpable shortsightedness aside, political partisanship was also why inaction was evidenced. The crux of that conversation concerned the failings of the Kumaratunga Presidency. Later, when the Rajapaksa regime destroyed the remnants of judicial independence, there was a radical change in position with indignation being expressed. The hypocrisy in this change in attitude was exceedingly profound. For as the Rajapaksas cracked the whip at the judiciary, the public service, the police service and the universities, the stage had already been set for this drama. This is the genesis of why all political parties have been able to play fast and loose with the public trust.
Taking heed of increasing public anger
Yet much of the shortsightedness that prevailed earlier has still not changed. The overriding fear is now to prevent a return of the Rajapaksas. But as the 19th Amendment surely teaches us, inept constitutional reform presents a range of thorny problems that may potentially be worse than what existed before.

The 1978 Constitution endured as it was devised by exceedingly clever (though Machiavellian) minds at the time. Its replacement or revision must be carefully thought out. Superficial play-acting in front of television cameras or the choreographed handing over of submissions to a committee which seems to primarily play the role of a post office in delivering ‘public views’ to the (ultimate) political decision makers will not do.

If corrective action is not taken through strategic public pressure to change the worrisome trajectory of this Government, a Rajapaksa-return may occur in any event. This will render the day dreamers among us quite irrelevant in the wider scheme of things. Certainly increasing rumbles of anger that we hear all over Sri Lanka can be ignored only at our peril.

Secularizing Sri Lanka; Paradox Of Sovereignty


By Anushka Kahandagama –April 11, 2016
Anushka Kahandagama
Anushka Kahandagama
Colombo Telegraph
Democracy is a complex mechanism which has its highs and lows. While social, political and economic ignorance of people can lead them to elect representatives who are incapable of representing citizens of the country and making accurate decisions, shallow identities created by the neo-liberal economic policies play a major role in democracy making the ‘ethno-religious’ majority powerful. Apart from all the structural weaknesses of the democracy, people have to deal with it and make it better, as it is the existing mechanism of governance in the country. One form of informing strengthening democracy is securing the relationship between the citizens and their representatives. The relationship between the citizens and their representatives locate a legal system which enables sovereignty of the country.
According to Giorgio Agamben sovereignty is a paradox which plays outside the legal system of the country and at the same time proclaims that there is nothing outside the legal system (Agamben, G., (1998), Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life,  Stanford University Press). Thus, the complexity of the phenomena should be dealt carefully as otherwise it would lead to the insidious abuse of power.
Due to the paradoxical nature of sovereignty, it could be influenced by many external factors and sovereignty could distort the legal system and present the ‘unfair’ legal system as ‘fair’ and ‘just’. According to the Article 9 of Sri Lankan Constitution, ‘The Republic of Sri Lanka shall give to Buddhism the foremost place and accordingly it shall be the duty of the State to protect and foster the Buddha Sasana, while assuring to all religions the rights granted by Articles 10 and 14(1) (e)’. This is the law of the country and it should not discriminate against ethnic the minority ethno-religious groups who live in the country. By giving the foremost place to Buddhism, state which is responsible for its citizen’s protection discriminate against the minority ethno-religious groups who are also citizens of the country. The article 9 of the Constitution provides an invisible power to Buddhist religious institutions which might harm the sovereignty of the country. The relationship between citizens and their representatives can be interfered by Buddhist religious institution without any obstruction or limitation from the state. Buddhist religious institution is not elected through votes of the citizens to advice the state. Thus, Buddhist religious institution is not over the citizen’s power to represent the state. Further, religious interference could be normalized in the mind of the people, as it is legitimized by the Constitution as well. Citizens of the country belong to various ethno-religious groups and could not be limited or reduced to Sinhala-Buddhists. Although it is reduced to Sinhala-Buddhists, they too represent different political views in the elections and elect members to the parliament to represent their political ideology. Against this background, the power holds by the citizen is immense in a democratic system and it should be secured. However, in Sri Lanka, this power is interfered by Buddhist religious institution. Although there are many examples that can be drawn from the political scenario of the country, it is important to cite a recent press conference which was held by The National Movement for the Protection of Soldiers (NMPS). Addressing the press conference, Buddhist monk Ven. Bengamuwe Nalaka Thera, criticized Field Martial Sarath Fonseka who was the then Army Commander and stated that he has asked Gotabaya Rajapaksa who was then Defense Secretary of the former government not to appoint Sarath Fonseka as the Commander of the Army. There might be much political discourse around this narrative. However, the influence one Buddhist monk could have been done over a responsible position of the country, Secretary of Defense, was immense. After, Ven. Bengamuwe Nalaka Thera further invited people to ask Gotabaya Rajapaksa and ensure the accuracy of his (Ven. Bengamuwe Nalaka Thera’s) statement. The normality involve with Buddhist religious institution playing with the sovereignty of the state is immense. Most of the citizens do not question the statement asking ‘from where Bengamuwe Nalaka Thera got the power to influence appointing high ranked position in the military?’, instead most of the citizens accept it as ‘normal’. On the other hand, the Buddhist Monk, Bengamuwe Nalaka Thera represents ‘The National Movement for the Protection of Soldiers (NMPS), and criticizes then Commander who has led the military at a critical time of war. The power holds by the Buddhist Monk is used by many parties in their political agendas by letting the sovereignty of the country in danger.

Lack of Funds Hampers National Co-Existence Ministry

by Easwaran Rutnam-Monday, April 11, 2016

Lack of adequate funds is hampering work at the Ministry of National Co-existence, Dialogue and Official Languages.
The Minister in charge, Mano Ganesan, said that the lack of funds for the subjects of national coexistence and official languages “scare” him.

The Ministry was established after the new government took office with the promise of ensuring the issues between the communities are addressed.

However, while addressing the issue of reconciliation, the government is bent on developing the country and boosting the economy.“The government needs to bring material successes to the podium urgently. So the ministries building bridges, houses, highways are prioritised. We are a developing nation. That’s understandable under the normal conditions. But we are just after a bloody war and started to build a new nation.  The scars and suspicions are there. So the lack of funds for the subjects of national coexistence and official languages scare me. Therefore I am looking towards the international donor agencies who support cohesion, coexistence, reconciliation and language policy implementations in Sri Lanka,” the Minister said when asked by The Sunday Leader about the funding issue.

Ganesan’s ministry is critical because it handles two key subjects, coexistence and official languages, both interlinked.

The successful implementation of the official languages policy (OLP)

would be the preamble to ethnic coexistence and coexistence is the prelude to a political solution.

“While my colleagues build material infrastructures, I am building hearts and minds of the peoples. The basic truth is that, the material development will last only if the hearts and minds of the people are strongly placed within the national coexistence road map. Sinhala, Tamil and English languages have obtained references in the constitution of Sri Lanka. Constitutional clauses of Sri Lanka recognises Sinhala and Tamil as (i) official (ii) administrative (iii) national languages and English language as the Link language. That’s fine. But it remains only in the papers today,” Ganesan said.


Minister disconnects with SLT Chief’s huge housing allowance

Minister Harin Fernando.----Chairman P.G. Kumarasinghe Sirisena-- Prime Minister

The Sunday Times Sri Lanka
Minister disconnects with SLT Chief's huge housing allowance

Sunday, April 10, 2016
Minister disconnects with SLT Chief’s huge housing allowanceA decision reportedly taken by the Sri Lanka Telecom (SLT) board to approve a huge monthly housing allowance of Rs. 725,000 for its Chairman P.G. Kumarasinghe Sirisena has been challenged by Telecommunications and Digital Infrastructure Minister Harin Fernando. The minister told the Sunday Times yesterday that he had told the Prime Minister that the figure approved for the housing allowance was too high and a review was needed.
“I am responsible to Parliament as the SLT comes under the purview of my ministry. I cannot change a decision taken by the board as its chairman has been appointed by the President,” he said. Chairman Kumarasinghe Sirisena is the brother of the President.
However, SLT Director W.H.K. Wagapitiya claimed that no such decision had been taken as stated by the Minister.
Earlier, Mr Fernando had written to the SLT chairman, saying that as the minister he was not being kept informed about the decisions taken by the board.
Mr. Kumarasinghe in his reply is learnt to have told Minister Fernando that SLT is a public quoted company and he is therefore answerable to the shareholders.  An attempt by the Sunday Times to obtain a response from Mr. Kumarasinghe was not successful, with no response to the calls or the messages on the mobile phone.
The minister in his letter said he believed in leadership styles which empowered managements to run their operations with freedom under supervision. However an integral part of their styles of leadership was clear communication and accountability.
He said that on numerous occasions, he had requested information on pending board decisions, reviews on major decisions, projects, union issues, employment guidance and other information pertaining to spending of public money. These responsibilities seemed to have fallen by the wayside and he was yet to receive information he sought on many issues since his appointment.
“I hearby instruct you to organize review meetings to go through all operational, financial and management matters with me. I also want to be kept informed of all pending board matters and decisions. Copies of the minutes of all board meetings and subsidiary board meetings have to be sent to me personally. All employees and HR related matters should also be discussed before decisions are made,” the minister said in his letter copied to the President and the Prime Minister.

Kumarasinghe Sirisena hauled up before Bribery and corruption commission ? Deal is one but dollars are in many millions..!

LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 11.April.2016, 6.30PM) SLT – Mobitel chairman Kumarasinghe Sirisena has caused a loss of US $ 20 million to the Mobitel Co. because of grave tender procedure violations committed by him. Therefore a complaint is to be made against him  to the Commission inquiring into allegations of bribery and corruption , based on reports reaching Lanka e news. 
Kumarasinghe who has misconstrued the people’s victory on 8 th January as a mandate to make him the chairman of SLT mobitel has committed this serious controversial violation  in relation  to an insurance cover tender of Mobitel Co. of which he is the chairman. 
Open tender bids were called by the Mobitel Co. in connection with the insurance cover tender. After the evaluation and re evaluation of the bids by two Tender boards , and the evaluation committee , the Mobitel Co. had to decide on another Insurance cover due to  the unilateral wishes of Kumarasinghe Sirisena without  awarding the tender duly as decided by the board and evaluation committee.
 
The decision of the two  Tender boards , the evaluation committee and the board of Directors was to award to the lowest bidder , whereas the tender awarded on Kumarasinghe’s wishes was to a bid that was US dollars 20 million more ! In SL Rupees this is a whopping Rs. 3000 million !
It was the Union assurance that had made the lowest bid in regard to the Mobitel Insurance cover. That was US $ 140 million  and this was the tender bid that was passed by the Tender boards and the evaluation committee . However , Kumarasinghe Sirisena instead of duly awarding the tender to Union assurance , has awarded it to SL Insurance which had quoted a much higher bid – US $ 20 million more !
It is worthy of note that the SL Insurance Co. is only  a semi government Institution and not fully owned by the government  .No matter what , nobody has a right to violate the tender procedure when a government Institution and a private Institution are competing for the tender. In the circumstances , Kumarasinghe Sirisena by showing an  affinity for the semi government SL Insurance Co. , had not only compromised the interests of the very Mobitel Co. of which he is the chairman , but has also engendered a loss of US $ 20 million (Rs. 3000,000,000.00) to the government  Institution .
If the chairman of a government Institution has the power to  decide on tender awards based on his own will and accord , the decision taken by the board of Directors after the tender boards and evaluation committee have decided becomes redundant and unnecessary . In other words , the chairman can decide directly on who should be awarded the tender .
It is unfortunate , Kumarasinghe Sirisena is unrelentingly and continuously indulging in corruption despite his embroilment in controversies and criticisms leveled against him. He  has got the wrong end of the stick.He has  misunderstood  the appointment of his brother as the executive president by the people. Perhaps he must be   assuming  that people have appointed him as the  executive chairman of the SLT Mobitel Co.
The disservice rendered to Union assurance Co. is not only a violation of the tender procedures but is also damaging the transparency of the government of good governance which the latter is striving hard to adhere to . A group that has been gaining  because of  the Union assurance Co. and the Mobitel   Co. is therefore getting ready to lodge a complaint with the Commission inquiring into Bribery and Corruption with regard to the losses that have resulted to these companies, Lanka e news learns.
Please await more information pertaining to the tender fraud perpetrated by Kumarasinghe Sirisena 
 ( There is a likelihood for Kumarasinghe Sirisena the chairman of SLT and  Mobitel to (mis) use his powers to ban these reports , and bar the SLT/Mobitel  customers from accessing them . Hence steps have been taken to publish this news completely via the face book for the benefit of our viewers. )
---------------------------
by     (2016-04-11 12:49:51)