Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Sunday, March 27, 2016

Cross party reiteration on need for international component to Sri Lanka's accountability process

26 March 2016
A cross-party coalition of British MPs convened to reiterate the need for international judges, prosecutors, investigators and witness protection experts in any accountability process in Sri Lanka. 
 
The All Party Parliamentary Group For Tamils (APPG-T) chaired by James Berry MP convened in the House of Commons last week in an annual event to discuss the rights situation in Sri Lanka.
 
Members of Parliament addressing the event called for international pressure to ensure that international judges were included in any accountability process and raised concerns with regards to ongoing military encroachment of Tamil land in the North-East. 

The event was attended by many MPs including Vice Chair of the APPG-T MP Wes Streeting, MP Mike Gapes, MP Barry Gardiner, MP Tom Brake, MEP Syed Kammal, MP Keith Vaz, MP John Mann and British Foreign Minister Hugo Swire.

Political Prisoners and Sri Lanka’s Sincerity Crisis

Taylor Dibbert-03/25/2016

In Sri Lanka, President Maithripala Sirisena had promised progress regarding Tamil political prisoners, although we’ve seen little of that. Unfortunately, the president’s dithering project has continued — with no end in sight.

More broadly, the Sri Lankan government has made big commitments regarding transitional justice and those changes, if they ever happen, will come incrementally. However, we haven’t seen much in the way of incremental change since Colombo co-sponsored a U.N. Human Rights Council resolution on Sri Lanka in October 2015.

In terms of optics and rhetoric, Mangala Samaraweera, the country’s foreign minister, continues to deliver strong speeches (that are designed primarily for international consumption). The problem is that Samaraweera is not running the country and his view regarding the (expansive) reform agenda doesn’t appear to align neatly with other key players in the government, including the president and the prime minister.

Worries about the government’s capacity to implement bold reforms, specifically as it relates to the pursuit of high-level corruption cases and transitional justice, are not baseless. That said, members of the international community who are greatly concerned with the provision of technical assistance and capacity-related matters may be missing a crucial point that precedes any thorough discussion regarding capacity: the coalition government’s sincerity. Is Colombo actually serious about fulfilling all of the promises it’s made? Are President Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe really prepared to connect words with actions and stand up to Sinhala nationalism?

Sri Lanka wants the world to believe that things are really changing. And yet the dubious detention of Tamils continues. To be clear, releasing or bringing to trial all Tamil political prisoners would be a big deal, though that’s the ground floor of war-related reforms that the government should move on. A proper truth commission? A robust accountability mechanism for wartime abuses? Putting senior members of the Sri Lankan military on trial? Moving on political prisoners would be scratching the surface of the politically inconvenient.

To conclude, Colombo’s cowardice regarding Tamil political prisoners is deeply troubling. Finally making a meaningful concession to the Tamil community could mean that the government is prepared to embrace bold changes, instead of cosmetic fixes. But until that happens, skepticism should remain the order of the day. If we’ve learned anything about Sirisena thus far, it’s that his Sinhala nationalist credentials are impossible to deny.

Southern relatives meet northern journalists

Southern relatives meet northern journalistsMar 27, 2016


Due to constant hindrance inflicted to the northern journalists by the security forces the active media freedom committee who is currently touring the Northern Province has organized a special meeting between the northern journalists and the security forces.

123 people including the media minister, deputy media minister, heads of state media, representatives of media organization, electronic, print and a team of web media journalists have started a tour in Jaffna.

Convener of the reconciliation tour which draws the umbrella and the stylus together, Freddie Gamage told BBC they are ready to meet the security chief’s of Jaffna and discuss about the current hindrances caused to the journalists in Jaffna.

A special discussion is scheduled to be held between the journalists in Jaffna and the heads of security forces. The police media spokesperson would also participate. Special attention would be focused about the problems faced by the journalists during the former era, said the convener of the independent active media committee Freddie Gamage.

A space to breath
Journalist Freddie Gamage reminded the statement said by the president recently that there is a major role entrusted to the south to build the required reconciliation and said under this context this tour was organized as a step taken forward the journey towards reconciliation.

He said during the former era amid the bitter experiences faced by the journalists in Jaffna there were no conducive atmosphere for the southern journalists to neither protect nor appear behalf of them.

“Although we appeared behalf of them for a certain extent it was not sufficient enough to protect their lives. While taking the advantage of the little space created to breath, in to account we thought to visit the north” said journalist Freddie Gamage.

Freddie Gamage further said that a monument would be built in the center of the Jaffna town in remembrance of the journalists died in north and the south during the previous regime.

RTI Bill now before Parliament, but several no-go areas

View(s): 101

The long-awaited Right to Information (RTI) Bill that seeks to give every Sri Lankan the right of access to information which is in the possession, custody or control of a public authority was presented to Parliament on Thursday by Minister of Parliamentary Reforms and Media Gayantha Karunatillake.
The Bill which was gazetted in January was presented to the House after all nine provincial councils gave their consent to it. However the Northern, the North Central and Sabaragamuwa Provincial Councils have suggested amendments to the Bill before it gets parliamentary approval.
Outlining the framework for the people to access information, the bill envisages the setting up of a five-member RTI Commission and the appointment of information officers in every public authority to assist citizens who wish to obtain information under this Act.
Those making a request for information will have to do so in writing giving details of their request, specifying form and language in which they prefer access but will not be required to give any reason for such a request or any other personal details except those that may be necessary for contacting him or her.
The Bill makes it mandatory for all records to be duly catalogued, indexed and preserved by every public authority. In the case of those records already in existence, they will need to be preserved for 10 years and in the case of new records which are created after the law becomes operational, for 12 years.
Public authorities will also be required to preserve all their records in electronic format subject to the availability of resources.
However, the Bill also cites several specified areas, to which access to information will not be granted.
These include personal information, the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual concerned. However, such information can still be obtained if the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information or the person concerned has consented in writing to such disclosure.
The Bill also prohibits the disclosure of such information that would undermine the defence of the State, its territorial integrity, or national security or would be or is likely to be seriously prejudicial to Sri Lanka’s relations with any State, or in relation to international agreements or obligations under international law, where such information was given by or obtained in confidence.
The disclosure of information that may cause serious prejudice to the economy of Sri Lanka is also prohibited under the proposed law.
These include disclosing prematurely decisions to change or continue the Government’s economic or financial policies relating to  exchange rates or the control of overseas exchange transactions,  entering into of overseas trade agreements; information, including commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property, protected under the Intellectual Property Act of 2003 and the disclosure of information which would harm the competitive position of a third party unless the public authority is satisfied that larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information.
Disclosure of any medical records is also banned, unless it has the written consent of the person concerned. Access to information is also denied with regard to any communication between a professional and a public authority, any communication between the Attorney General and any officer or a public authority assisting the AG in the performance of his or her duties. Information required to be kept confidential by reason of the existence of a fiduciary relationship will also not be given access to, under the proposed law.
NPC wants RTI expanded to private authoritiesAccess to information held by private authorities if such information is necessary in the public interest is one of the 19 amendments the Northern Provincial Council has recommended to the Right to Information Bill.
The council has given its consent to the Bill following a debate. But the resolution on the Bill recommends that the public must have access to information held by private authorities and Bill should be amended in such a way that it should refer to “public and private authorities” instead of just “public authorities”.
Another amendment the council seeks refers to Section 8, in terms of which a minister should publish a biannual report, giving information about the ministry, its duties, functions, activities and responsibilities of employees and details available to citizens for obtaining information.
The council recommends that the report should also contain information about mechanisms to entertain complaints and respond to direct requests. The ministry should also state in its report how it dealt with the complaints and requests and publish a summary.
The council also recommends that the bill should contain provision whereby the public will also have information about the information officer — his or her name, functions and contact details.
In provisions referring to correspondence, the council recommends the rewording of the provision so that information can be sought and obtained in Sinhala and Tamil, which are official languages, and English.
Noting that information on people in custody is matter of high importance to the people of the North, the council observes that the draft bill only grants the right of access to information concerning “the life and personal liberty of the citizen making such request” for information. But the council insists that the bill should contain provision to allow third parties to access information about others whose life and personal liberty are in question.
“Where the request for information concerns the life and personal liberty of a person, the response to it shall be made within forty eight hours of the receipt of the request,” the council resolution says.
The council also notes that the Right to Information Commission is virtually impotent since it has no powers to impose any sanctions on anybody for noncompliance. “This needs to be attended to as otherwise the Commission will not be able to enact its writ and further the democratic cause for transparency,”
With regard to the requirement to maintaining all categories of official records for twelve years, the council is of the view that it is an unnecessary burden on every public authority. It observes that some categories of records may not be required for any official purpose beyond two years and the Right to Information law should not become a bar on the destruction of records that are no longer necessary for official use and have no archival value.

Economic Development Through Toxin Free Agriculture


By Rumal Siriwardena –March 25, 2016 
Rumal Siriwardena
Rumal Siriwardena
Colombo Telegraph
Capacity building workshops for farmers of the Trincomalee district onclimate change adaptation for agriculture, through the implementation of toxin free, organic farming and crop diversification was held 23rd March, 2016, in Padavishripura and Morawewa. The workshops were organized by SLYCAN Trust in partnership with the Nagenahiru Development Society as part of a programme to educate the farmers on the impacts of climate change to the agricultural sector, and how adapting to the impacts through crop diversified farming.
Understanding Climatic Impacts on Agriculture
AgriSpeaking at the event, Eastern Province Provincial Council Member Mr. Priyantha Pathirana said, “It is important that farmers understand the impacts of climate change and the need for adapting to them in the simplistic form. It is a day to day reality, and we experience in real life. It is important that farmer communities are educated on how to adapt, and how agriculture could be adapted to minimize the impacts of climate change to the agriculture sector.”
He further elaborated on the need to empower communities to stand up on their own, and not to be living with a dependency based mindset. He added that communities which are poor could develop economically if there was the correct mindset, and the build capacity to empower them in their decision making.
Shifting from Toxin Based to Organic Farming
Programme Coordinator for SLYCAN Trust Mr. Kavindu Ediriweera, the implementing entity of the project expressed his view on the implementation of the project. He said, “It is important for farmers to understand that there is an alternate option to chemical fertilizer based farming. Many do not turn to organic and toxin free agriculture mainly because they do not have the sufficient technical knowledge to implement it. The workshops are designed to address this need, and to encourage farmers to move towards organic and crop diversified farming.”

Parliament regains control over public finances: A rare phenomenon after a lapse of ten years

MAR  26  2016
It was a crucial decision the Party Leaders were compelled to take for the well-being of the society at a time the country is facing an economic crunch due to the prevailing global situation. The debt trap laid by the previous regime due to haphazard handling of the country's finances is yet another reason for the cash strapped administration to drop the proposal to increase the emoluments of Parliamentarians.
May be temporarily until the economy rebounds, people may think that sanity prevailed among more matured parliamentarians to forego the sharp rise in allowances proposed to cushion rising costs in the day-to-day affairs.
Taking a step or two back, could be described as strategic moves in the face of a looming economic downturn which is a global phenomenon where Sri Lanka could not be isolated. Wisdom prevailed as the Party Leaders who met just hours before the Cabinet meeting decided not to submit their previously agreed proposals to increase the emoluments of MPs for Cabinet approval.
In more ways than one, it was a sensible decision taken, mostly thinking of the perilous situation the country was in and the vehement pressure exerted by the civil society groups. The moment the news of the proposed allowances was leaked two weeks back, it raised many eyebrows and earned flak from many sections of the society, given its poor timing and the burden on the public purse.
Bonanza for MPs
Ironically, the agreement to raise the allowances of MPs was made by the House Committee on the same day Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe made a special statement in Parliament urging for a joint will of all to strive together to save the country from what he called a "debt trap".
The Party Leaders, who met a day after the Premier's speech, discussed in favour of proposed bonanza for MPs turning a blind eye on the fact that the general public had been burdened with more tax and spiralling cost of living. Needless to say, this move of the MPs to serve themselves with a larger spoon at the cost of tax payers' money antagonized the citizenry and made them react accordingly. Given the negative public perception associated with the majority of contemporary politicians in the country, one could hardly expect a different reaction, but at the same time, it was also unfair by a few who could still claim the moral high ground as cleaned and principled politicians.
Speaker Karu Jayasuriya, who was at the receiving end of public anger over the move, had to issue a media statement clarifying the reasons behind the move. The Speaker looking through the lens of MPs justified the proposals stating the allowances of MPs have not been amended for nine years since 2007. He pointed out the salaries and allowances received by MPs in Sri Lanka were relatively low compared to their counterparts in South Asia and other countries.
However, the Party Leaders presided by the Speaker, finally decided to withdraw most of their proposals taking a sharp cognizance of the growing public displeasure when they met again on Wednesday. Accordingly, it was decided only to go ahead with the proposal to pay a monthly allowance of Rs. 50,000 each for seven MPs who have not received quarters at the Madiwela MPs' housing complex. The proposals to pay an allowance for the MPs who participate in the meetings of the Constitutional Assembly and Sectoral Oversight Committees were also said to be put on hold.
Global economic challenges
While these decisions were being agreed upon at a closed door meeting in a Committee Room, the House was debating extensively on the current economic situation in the country based on the Prime Minister's statement in Parliament on March 8.
The one and half days' debate on the difficulties the country has faced on the fiscal front, was a positive indication that Parliament was regaining the control over public finances, ending the dark days of which Parliament acted merely as the rubber stamp approving whatever the decisions taken by the top management of the previous administration.
Giving a kick start for the debate, Chief Opposition Whip Anura Kumara Dissanayake presented what one may agree as a well-thought-out strategy to advance the country towards a healthy economy. He opined alien models of other distant lands would take the country nowhere, adding that the economists should contemplate on a unique recipe that fits best for the country.
He also cautioned Prime Minister Wickremesinghe on the need to cut loose his old friends who could bring his Government down with imprudent advices when it comes to economic and policy decisions. He claimed some close associates of the Prime Minister have no knowledge of the ground realities of the country. "They do not live in this country. They know nothing about this land or its history. They are ignorant about the life style and the real issues of the people. The economic plans they have in their heads may not work here", he said.
Making a scathing attack on the reckless economic handling of the former Government, he said the current Government has a responsibility to reveal what had happened to the money obtained through loans by the former Government. "Out of the Rs. 9.5 trillion loans obtained, at least 40 percent had been stolen, wasted or gone as commissions. This amount is not less than Rs. 4,000 billion. People should know the truth. This is a debt for which the former rulers must be accounted", he added.
The Prime Minister joining in the debate once again reiterated the global economic challenges before the country, repeating some of the remarks made in his earlier statement. Interesting enough was his comment at the outset of his speech that he never asked the general public to tighten up their belts, taking somewhat a different turn to what he previously said on swallowing bitter pills to cure the sick economy. He stressed that the village and national level development and the objectives of the Government would be accomplished despite the prevailing economic hardships.
The Prime Minister also touched on the island-wide power outage during his speech. He noted his Government was seriously looking in to the causes behind the recent power failures that crippled the day to day work and economic activities of the country. He assured Parliament that all possible measures would be taken to supply uninterrupted power and avoid a possible power crisis in the country by 2018.
Power and Renewable Energy Minister Ranjith Siyambalapitiya also made a lengthy statement on the recent power outages explaining on the short term and long term plans made to confront the challenges in the power sector. He also emphasised that the Government has no whatsoever plan to privatize the Ceylon Electricity Board.
Soon after the Minister's statement, MP Sisira Jayakody stood up for a point of order flashing a touch in the House while complaining that the Government has failed to address the power crisis. His action aimed at gaining cheap publicity and attention of media irritated the Speaker and the MP was reprimanded the following day by summoning him to the Speaker's office.
Right to Information Bill
Meanwhile, the Joint Opposition has once again resorted to play its old tricks of bringing No-Confidence Motions (NCMs) against the ministers to browbeat and inconvenience the Government. The first of the series of NCMs was handed over to the Speaker on Thursday against Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake. The motion contained the signatures of 37 MPs. NCMs against Land Minister John Amaratunga and Megapolis Development Minister Champika Ranawaka are also said to be in the queue.
Despite deliberate attempts to obstruct the Government's path, the Government last Thursday took a giant leap forward in the direction of good governance by presenting the long-awaited and much talked-of Right to Information Bill (RTI) in Parliament. The historic piece of legislation was presented by Parliamentary Reforms and Mass Media Minister Gayantha Karunathilake.
The introduction of RTI bill was a key election pledge of President Maithripala Sirisena and his Government. In fact the bill was due in Parliament in February last year going by the calendar of 100-day work programme. It was procrastinated given various technical and legal delays. However, the bill has now seen the light of the day and the next biggest challenge is to make it sail through Parliament safely while preserving the spirit of the legislation.
The presentation of the bill while Speaker Karu Jayasuriya in the Chair was also significant given his attempts to introduce this vital piece of legislation as a private member's motion in September 2010 and June 2011. The move was thwarted by the then Government at both the occasions.
The Speaker informed the House that the Sabaragamuwa, North Central and Northern Provincial Councils have proposed amendments to the RTI bill, while the other Provincial Councils have agreed to the Bill in the present form. MP Anura Dissanayake requested the Government to provide them with the amendments proposed by the Provincial Councils to study them altogether.
The bill, which was eagerly looked forward to by the citizenry, is aimed at providing for the right of access to information, to specify grounds on which access may be denied, to establish a Right to Information Commission, to appoint Information Officers and related matters. It will be taken up for debate at a future date.
Sri Lanka’s debt situation: What are our options?

logoFriday, 25 March 2016
The external financing situation for Sri Lanka is certainly a big worry for both the Government and the private sector. This is largely due to monstrous financial profligacy of the past not yet fully explained. However, it is also due to a large trade deficit and a drop in exports and worker remittance.  65dfh

In 2015, our trade deficit was around $ 8.5 billion. Worker remittance was around $ 6.9 billion. Capital flows were negative. We had a balance of payment deficit of $1.5 billion. The only upside in 2015 was tourism – $ 3 billion – a 24% increase. If the trade deficit can be managed to around $ 7 billion, the higher income from tourism, exports and technology services could help our balance of payments to have a surplus.

However, there are many other challenges for our external finances like the stability of the rupee, declining reserves and capital flows. Our export income is only around 55% of our imports. Therefore it is a must that Sri Lanka in the short-term limits the foreign debt financing only for projects that have multiple benefits for the economy. 

Furthermore, we need to focus more on debt refinancing, debt swaps, work hard to attract more FDI by introducing investment friendly policies and restructure the BOI to support that drive and more importantly manage the export trade supply side of the equation.
 6

Government debt

Sri Lanka’s total Government debt at the end of 2015 was $ 81 billion; out of this foreign debt was around 60%. According to Central Bank data, our total debt will touch $ 103 billion this year – around 98% of revenue and – foreign debt will increase to $ 57 billion this year. 

Today public debt is almost 100% of GDP. Therefore there is lot of work that needs to be done given that we have BOP deficit of $ 1.5 billion from 2015 to manage first. Many of the short-term loans got at exorbitant rates taken for unproductive projects is one of the root causes for this situation. 

For e.g., the Mattala Airport debt arrangement needs to be renegotiated and those assets needs to be productively used for the betterment of society. The IMF Structural Adjustment Facility if effectively negotiated could help the economy to ride over this crisis, however the policy direction to improve the supply side is a must as well as tightening of fiscal and monetary policies.
Way forward for Sri Lanka

While the Government is looking for short-term options to ride over this crisis like the recent currency swap with India for $ 1.1 billion and the proposed one with China for $ 1 billion, all these arrangements have their cost and political consequences.

It is important from now on to only invest in ongoing projects if there are clear benefits over cost and projects that don’t drain our foreign exchange reserves. Some of the big-ticket projects like the Megapolis and mega road development projects may need to be phased over the next few years. 

However, if we are to attract more FDI, we need to invest more on education and skills to improve the productivity of the workforce and to improve our inward remittances, given that the dependency of inward remittance may no longer be sustainable in the long term.

FDI instead of debt financing and foreign borrowings is what we need: That however would require a conducive investment climate that protects equity rights, and property rights and deregulation. Sri Lanka urgently needs a medium-term plan to increase commercial exports and services.

The Sri Lankan economy has faced much bigger challenges before. Therefore, given its strategic location within South Asia and the goodwill we have earned in the last 12 months with the international community, Sri Lanka should look to exploit those opportunities to improve the living standards of all the people.

(The writer is a senior company director.)

‘To learn about establishing new governments, come to me; dashing coconuts is not the method’ -Minister Mangala (Video)


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 26.March.2016, 11.30PM) ‘If you want to learn how to topple governments , meet me and  study the method instead of dashing coconuts which is a futile exercise .’ This advice was proffered by  Mangala Samaraweera minister of foreign affairs  to the dejected and rejected Kurunegala district M.P. Mahinda Rajapakse who in his desperation is dashing coconuts to regain power .  
The Minister gave this valuable advice when he attended a function to inaugurate an American- Sri Lankan  Co. ‘Riococo’ building at Kurunegala.  This was his answer to  a  question posed by a journalist.
When the  journalist asked the minister to comment on the coconut dashing ‘circus’ of the joint opposition , the minister responded  thus :
‘ If they want to topple the goevrnment , tell Mahinda Rajapakse M.P. to come and meet me; he cannot topple governments by dashing coconuts. Mahinda is only displaying to the world of his bankrupt  political stance  through his group of coconut  robbers going from place to place dashing coconuts.’ 

Mangala the giant killer  …….the story 

It is well to recall ,  Mangala Samaraweera was responsible to  initiate the move to invite Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunge again to the SLFP ,and with  her leadership establish a government in 1994 under the People’s United Alliance which  defeated the UNP that held sway for 17 years after coming into power in 1977 .
Thereafter , a group including S.B.Dissanayake and   Dr. G.L. Peiris crossed over from the SLFP and joined with the UNP to form a UNP government .During the short period of  two years rule of the  UNP , it was Mangala Samaraweera who took measures  to form the UPFA together with the JVP , and defeat the UNP thereby installing  an SLFP led UPFA government. 
Again it was Mangala Samaraweera who was the architect of the victory of Mahinda Rajapakse at the presidential elections .When Mangala was the election campaign manager at that election in 2005, neither Basil nor Gotabaya the wayside politicos were on the scene. Subsequently , when Mahinda became the president and began exalting his family rule and insulting the one who put him on the pedestal in much the same way as a rascal of a King who has no sense of gratitude , Mangala was the first who dared to defy him and his despotic powers , and discard Mahinda  like  stinking excreta to join with the UNP which was then always on a losing streak.  From that point of time he infused life  and imparted strength to the UNP.
During the period  when the murderous brutal power of the Rajapakse regime was at its peak  , and the decisive battle was being launched to chase Ranil from the leadership  , Mangala along with the famous ‘kurundupolu’ army , fearlessly coming   to the open and in Matara itself nipping  the moves in the bud and annihilating the efforts to remove Ranil , was just one of his actions to safeguard and shield Ranil ,thereby also  oxygenating the wilted opposition at that time.  
It was Mangala Samaraweera who formed the communication force to meet the challenges of Rajapkases’ media suppression . In addition ,  it was he who prepared  the groundwork for the  social media network of the rainbow revolution of January 8 th 2015. He toiled  hard and long to muster the available  resources to achieve those  goals. 
When the UNP was continuously losing elections , it was Mangala Samaraweera who proved that the opposition can win , and planned the victory at the Uva provincial council (PC) elections . The UNP leadership board which  was formed by that time making  headway was Mangala’s brainchild .
From as far back as 2011, it was Mangala who was steadfast in the view that if Mahinda Rajapakse is to be defeated, a section of the SLFP should be  taken out from it. With this in view ,hidden  moves were made and in pursuance of secretly calculated  plans , Maithripala Sirisena , the SLFP general secretary was put forward as  the common opposition candidate on 21 st November 2014. Until November  5 th , some UNP leaders were of the opinion , that UNP can win contesting alone .If that had happened , still Mahinda a would be the president even today.
Mangala Samaraweera the giant killer is a true  veteran in charting governments to victory !
Mangala’s anouncement and video are hereunder 
---------------------------
by     (2016-03-27 00:38:02)

Govt. under fire over move to reduce paddy production 


article_image
by Maheesha Mudugamuwa-March 26, 2016, 10:14 am
Former Agriculture Minister Mahinda Yapa Abeywardene yesterday lashed out at Agriculture Minister Duminda Dissanayake over the latter’s decision to reduce the paddy production in the country to ensure good prices for paddy.

Minister Dissanayake said at a meeting at the Anuradhapura District Secretariat on Wednesday that the paddy cultivation should be reduced and farmers should be guided to grow more supplementary crops. The total demand for rice at present was 250,000MT and to meet that only four million MT of paddy was required. But, the production was as high as 4.9 million MT. It meant that there was a surplus of one million MT of paddy production in the country and the surplus was about 25 percent of the total production.

Former Minister Abeywardena maintained that the excess paddy production was only 14 percent and that surplus was negligible.

He told The Island that the paddy production in particular was vulnerable to weather conditions and climate changes and there might be a fall in paddy production due to a drought or flood or both.

The Matara District UPFA parliamentarian, who had served as the Agriculture Minister from 2010 to January last year said it was essential to ensure national food security and the country should have adequate stocks of rice from good harvests to meet shortfalls at other times.

"Someone has misled the Minister Dissanayake with false statistics," Abeywardene said.

He said it was the UNP’s policy to import all commodities but they should keep in mind that imports would be possible only if there was enough food in other countries.

Abeywardena said that today food security was one aspect that the government must prioritise, noting that the country would have to face a difficult situation if it did not improve its own agro-based food production.

Currently, the maize production had been completely stopped and farmers were insisting that they would not cultivate it due to the cut in subsidies which had been given to them earlier and they couldn’t bear the cost of the current production, he noted.

Weerawansa Family And Friends’ Joyride At State Expense

Wimal Weerawansa

  • A fleet of 40 vehicles hired for State Engineering used by ex-minister’s cronies
by Nirmala Kannangara-Saturday, March 26, 2016

Weerasangilige Wimal Weerawansa who mouths slogans and gives breast-beating displays of patriotism from political platforms despite his involvement in large-scale corruption and undercover activities, has once again been exposed as a corrupt politician. This time around, details have emerged of how he allegedly hired a fleet of 40 luxury vehicles spending millions of rupees of taxpayers’ hard-earned money, to have relatives and friends travel in luxury.

The Sunday Leader this week exposes how Weerawansa misused State Engineering Corporation (SEC) funds to pay the hiring charges for this fleet of vehicles when he was Housing and Construction Minister in the Rajapaksa regime. Earlier this newspaper exposed how Weerawansa who was operating a small telecommunication centre in Kadawatha and whose sole asset was a four perch land in Millegahawatte, Pahala Biyanwila in Kadawatha at the time he entered parliament in 2000, became a multi-millionaire in no time after he extended his support to Mahinda Rajapaksa in 2008. Despite portraying himself as a patriotic, clean politician, the renegade Marxist has now been exposed as a wheeler-dealer who made money through various nefarious deals.
When accused of hiring vehicles using state funds for his relatives, Weerawansa had responded that none of these vehicles were used by his relatives or friends but were used for official work.

Be that as it may, The Sunday Leader is in possession of details of the 40 SEC vehicles hired during Weerawansa’s tenure. However the details of how some of these vehicles were assigned to are not known as all the detailed files relating to this fraud have been taken over by the Commission to Investigate Allegation into Bribery or Corruption, said Deputy Chairman SEC, Mahen Pelpola.

Maha Sanga Protests Appointment Of First Transgender Governor

After the appointment of the new Governor, President Maithripala Sirisena tweeted Congratulations to Niluka Ekanayake, Governor of Central Province. She replaces the eminent spokesperson for women, Surangani Ellawala“.
Niluka Ekanayake
Colombo Telegraph
March 26, 2016
One of Sri Lanka’s main Buddhist institutions, the Asgiriya Chapter, has protested regarding the appointment of the newly appointed Governor of the Central Province on the basis of gender.
President Maithripala Sirisena appointed Niluka Ekanayake to the post of Governor Central Province on the 17th, March 2016.
She is the first transgender person to hold such a high profile post in Sri Lanka’s history.
Niluka Ekanayaka
She was charged on two counts one for impersonation and one for forgery
“Niluka Ekanakayake has no qualifications to justify her appointment to such a lucrative government position. Her only qualification is that she is the secret horoscope reader for President Maithripala Sirisena.”
” I’m not sure whether he is promoting a marginalised person or promoting his secret astrologer. I didn’t ask President about this since it is his choice and he has power to appoint anyone he wants, since this appointment didn’t want the approval of the Constitutional Council” one of the President’s close confidantes told Colombo Telegraph on the condition of anonymity.
History 
Although she was born as a man and named Sattambige Don Neil Sriyaratne at birth, she behaved like a girl from her childhood days, Niluka’s father told media some time ago.
According to Colombo Telegraph research, as a transgender person, especially a transgender woman, she has been experiencing widespread prejudice, discrimination and other forms of stigma.
Earlier in 1997 a man named Sattambige Don Neil Sriyaratne pleaded guilty to a Criminal Investigation Department charge for impersonation.
Uduwe Dhammaloka Thera at CID

2016-03-26
Ven. Uduwe Dhammaloka Thera arrived at the CID today to give a statement regarding the death of Kotte Naga Viharaya Chief Incumbent Ven. Maduluwawe Sobitha Thera. Pix by Gayan Amarasekara - 


Saturday, March 26, 2016

Saudi Arabia Is Committing War Crimes in Yemen

How can the United States, Britain, and France keep shipping Riyadh arms when its pilots are dropping bombs on innocent civilians?
Saudi Arabia Is Committing War Crimes in Yemen

BY RASHA MOHAMEDRAWAN SHAIF-MARCH 25, 2016

LONDON and SANAA — It was a hot, dry day in early July 2015. Salah Basrallah, a farmer in Yemen’s northern region of Saada, stood among a cluster of nine houses that used to comprise his little village of Eram. He surveyed the pulverized scene in silence. He had lost 21 family members in four consecutive airstrikes on his village, including his six children and wife. Nearby lay the remnants of an MK-80 series bomb, similar to those found at many other coalition strike locations and which the United States is known to supply to Saudi Arabia.

The attacks killed 55 people in total, according to local authorities in Saada, including 35 children. Several people were killed in follow-up airstrikes, as they tried to rescue people in the aftermath of the first bombing. It took survivors five days to dig out all the bodies; many had been shredded to pieces.

Fast forward to this year. With the coalition bombing campaign hitting the one-year mark, airstrikes continue to devastate the lives of innocent Yemeni families. In the capital of Sanaa, all that remains of the home where Judge Yahya Rubaid and his family once lived is a metal skeleton, chunks of concrete dangling from what used to be his living room. An airstrike hit at 1:30 a.m. on Jan. 25, as the judge and his wife, children, and grandchildren slept. A second strike followed shortly after, the sound echoing through the city.

According to family members, Rubaid was a judge on a case against Yemeni President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, for treason in absentia. It is unclear whether his house was attacked for this reason. What is clear, however, is that there was no legally valid basis for bombing his home, as he and his family were civilians and under international law should not have been deliberately targeted.
Mohammed Abdullah, Rubaid’s nephew, recalled digging through mounds of rubble, finding no bodies beneath.

“We immediately ran to my uncle’s home and frantically began looking for their bodies to see who had survived,” he said. He called one of his daughters’ phones and heard its muffled ringing close by. When Abdullah returned to dig once more for signs of life, he soon realized that buried beneath the gray stones were body parts — lumps of flesh, bone, and sinew. A few feet away, half of Rubaid’s body was found on top of a gas station opposite his bedroom.

“We lost count of how many body parts we had found; no one was whole,” he said.

These gruesome scenes are just two examples of the horrors that Yemen has seen since the Saudi-led military coalition launched its air campaign in March 2015. On one side of this war is the Houthi armed group, often referred to as the “Popular Committees,” which is supported by armed groups loyal to former Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh and parts of the army. On the other side is the military coalition led by Saudi Arabia and allied forces on the ground, usually referred to as muqawama, or the “resistance,” fighting on behalf of Hadi and his government.

The Houthis and their allies — armed groups loyal to Saleh — are the declared targets of the coalition’s 1-year-old air campaign. In reality, however, it is the civilians, such as Basrallah and Rubaid, and their children, who are predominantly the victims of this protracted war. Hundreds of civilians have been killed in airstrikes while asleep in their homes, when going about their daily activities, or in the very places where they had sought refuge from the conflict. The United States, Britain, and others, meanwhile, have continued to supply a steady stream of weaponry and logistical support to Saudi Arabia and its coalition.

One year on, it still remains unclear who is winning the war. Saudi Arabia and its coalition partners claim to have regained control of more than 80 percent of the country, but the Houthis remain in control of the key strongholds of Sanaa, Ibb, and Taiz. Moreover, armed groups such as al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and the Islamic State are gaining ground and support in the south and southeast parts of the country, taking advantage of the security vacuum to consolidate their power. One thing is clear: Yemeni civilians are losing the most.

This wanton disregard for the lives of civilians continues unabated.

At approximately 11:30 a.m. on March 15, the market in Khamees, a town in northern Yemen, was destroyed in two apparent airstrikes by the Saudi-led coalition, claiming the lives of 106 civilians, including 24 children. One man, Hasan Masafi, who spoke to us over the phone, couldn’t even grieve his 18-year-old son’s death because he couldn’t locate his whole body. “We were only able to find his right leg,” he said.

The facts speak for themselves, and evidence of violations of international humanitarian law cannot be dismissed as mere hearsay, as the British government has attempted to do with U.N. reports. Amnesty International and other organizations have presented compelling evidence over the past year that indicates all parties to the Yemen conflict have committed war crimes. But some countries do not want to see the evidence that is staring them in the face. Flooding the region with arms is akin to adding fuel to the fire.

Attacks like the one on Khamees market have become the norm for civilians in Yemen. More than 3,000 civilians have been killed during the conflict, according to the United Nations. Thousands of others have been injured, more than 2.5 million have been displaced, and 83 percent of Yemenis are reliant on humanitarian assistance. There is barely a single corner of Yemen or a single soul that hasn’t in some way been touched and scarred by this war.

The Saudi-led coalition’s response to reports of civilians unlawfully killed — and homes, schools, and infrastructure destroyed — has been to constantlyrepeat the mantra that “only military targets are hit by airstrikes.” The situation on the ground tells a very different story. With each unlawful coalition airstrike, it becomes more evident that Saudi Arabia and other coalition members either do not care about respecting international humanitarian law or are incapable of adhering to its fundamental rules.

And yet, Britain, the United States, and France continue to authorize lucrative arms deals with the Saudi-led coalition — apparently without batting an eyelash.Since November 2013, the U.S. Defense Department has authorized more than $35.7 billion in major arms deals to Saudi Arabia. This includes the announcement of a $1.29 billion U.S. arms sale to Saudi Arabia in November 2015 that will supply Riyadh with 18,440 bombs and 1,500 warheads. Meanwhile, during his time in office, British Prime Minister David Cameron has overseen the sale of more than $9 billion worth of weaponry to Saudi Arabia, including nearly $4 billion since airstrikes on Yemen began, according to the Campaign Against Arms Trade, a London-based NGO.

Regardless of when the weapons used by coalition forces in Yemen were acquired — whether before or since the start of the air campaign — the countries that supplied them have a responsibility to ensure that they are not facilitating violations of international law.

While the relentless coalition airstrikes account for most of the civilian deaths in the conflict, civilians also find themselves increasingly trapped in the crossfire between Houthi and anti-Houthi armed groups, with each side supported by different units of the now-divided armed forces.

A case in point is the southern city of Taiz, which has suffered restrictions on movement of food and medical supplies since at least November. Attacks continue to maim and kill civilians, including children.

When Amnesty International visited the city in July 2015, we witnessed the irresponsible conduct of fighters firsthand and documented 30 ground attacks, which led to more than 100 casualties. One of those victims was 12-year-old Ayham Anees, who was killed in an apparent Houthi mortar attack in May.

Munther Mohamed, Anees’s uncle, described rushing to the scene after hearing children’s screams following the attack. “I also saw my nephew Ayham, whose head had separated from his body,” he said. “I had told the children to play in the middle of the alley because it was the safest place, but it was not.”
The crisis in Taiz has only gotten worse in recent days. While the Houthis have been partially pushed out of the city center, they still maintain control of the majority of the governorate. Where the Houthis have been forced to retreat, they have laid landmines — internationally banned weapons that have already claimed dozens of civilian lives.

Last week, the spokesman for the Saudi-led coalition announced that operations are nearing their end in Yemen. What that means in practice is not yet clear, as airstrikes continue to pound the country. But accountability doesn’t take a back seat just because military operations may be winding down.
It’s time to bring these crimes against civilians to an end. With peace talksexpected to take place in Kuwait on April 18, all parties must prioritize several crucial conditions: protecting the long-term interests of ordinary Yemenis, ensuring an end to the horrors of the past year, and guaranteeing that those responsible will be held accountable. All those civilian lives lost as a result of violations won’t be forgotten, even if this chapter of war closes.

It’s too late for the children of Salah Basrallah. But there’s no excuse not to do the right thing now. States should act immediately to ensure that none of Yemen’s warring parties is supplied — either directly or indirectly — with weapons, munitions, military equipment, or technology that would be used in any furtherance of the conflict. And they must do everything in their power to ensure there is an independent international investigation into violations by all sides aimed at ensuring justice and reparation — for Salah Basrallah and the thousands of other victims of this deadly war.
MOHAMMED HUWAIS/AFP/Getty Images