Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Anti-Corruption Activist Nihal Sri Ameresekere In Rs 100 Million Scandal


December 12, 2015 
Colombo Telegraph
Well-known Sri Lankan professional consultant, public interest litigant and anti-corruption activist Nihal Sri Ameresekere, finds himself in the middle of a Rs 100 million scandal where a deal was finalized involving the Bank of Ceylon (BoC) and the Treasury less than a month before the Presidential Election.
Nihal Sri Ameresekere
Nihal Sri Ameresekere
According to documents in Colombo Telegraph’s possession, Ameresekere had requested the BoC for a Rs 100 million overdraft in early December 2014. The Bank was told that Ameresekere would be in a position to repay the money within a month because he would be receiving a sum exceeding this amount from the Treasury. He claimed that the Treasury owed him money and furnished a letter from the Deputy Secretary to the Treasury, S.R. Attygalle confirming this.
Colombo Telegraph learns that Ameresekere is yet to settle the amount outstanding a year after the overdraft was obtained.
Ameresekere has maintained that the Treasury had owned him money for services rendered related to negotiations with a Japanese contractor by the name of Mmitsui & Taisei. He has also implied that he helped reduce interest rates and re-schedule loans, according to correspondence in our possession. Ameresekere’s overall claim includes fees for looking after the interests of the Government and Hotel Developers Ltd.
As of now there’s no evidence that Ameresekere was officially contracted to deliver any such services for the Government or for Hotel Developers Ltd.
Colombo Telegraph wrote to Ameresekere seeking clarification on matters arising from the above. We asked him the following:
1. Did you request an overdraft from the Bank of Ceylon in early 2014?
2. Did you say that you will repay within a month since there were monies due to you from the Treasury?
3. If you did receive the overdraft, did you repay within a month and if you did not, why not?
4. Was there any written agreement with the Treasury that you will be paid for actions and efforts which resulted in the write-off of Jap Yen 17,586 million due to Mitsui & Taisei, reduction of interest rates and the re-schedulement of loans?
5. Were you formally tasked to assist and defend the interests of the Government and Hotel Developers Ltd in the litigation instituted or caused to be instituted by Cornel & Company?
6. If so, was there any agreement regarding compensation due for these efforts?
Ameresekere is yet to respond.                                                                    Read More
SI arrested accepting Rs. 20, 000 bribe


2015-12-12
A Police Sub Inspector (SI) attached to the Haputale Police was nabbed by bribery sleuths this morning, while accepting a bribe of Rs. 20, 000 for preparing a Police report on a three-wheeler destroyed in a fire. 

The SI was arrested inside the Police station, while accepting the bribe of Rs.20, 000 out of the Rs. 30, 000 that he had solicited. 

The Sub Inspector had solicited the bribe from an individual, who had come to the Police station to obtain a Police report to submit it to an insurance company. 

The SI is to be produced in the courts today. (Saman Palitha Nanayakkara)


article_image
By Shamindra Ferdinando- 

Former Economic Affairs Minister Basil Rajapaksa will be summoned soon by the Presidential Commission of Inquiry to investigate and inquire into Serious Acts of Fraud, Corruption and Abuse of Power, State Resources and Privileges (PRECIFAC) to explain payments amounting to over Rs. 156 mn to the SLAF for using fixed wing aircraft and helicopters.

Former Accountant at the Economic Affairs Ministry M. M. J. N. R. Fernando on Thursday told the PRECIFAC that Divineguma funds to the tune of nearly Rs 157 mn had been utilized to pay the SLAF.

The commission comprises four High Court judges namely Preethi Padman Surasena (Chairman), Amandra Seneviratne, Vikum Kaluarachchi and Gihan Kulathunga. Retired Director

(Administration) of Parliament Lacille de Silva is Secretary to the Commission.

Fernando, now with the Prime Minister’s Office revealed the payments made at the behest of the then SLFP strongman until the very end of the Rajapaksa administration. PRECIFAC sources told The Island that the SLAF had cooperated with the investigation launched on the basis of a petition received by them. Sources said that investigators would inquire into the possibility of Minister Rajapaksa’s wife Pushpa, too, having used the SLAF aircraft.

Responding to a query by The Island, sources said that Basil Rajapaksa’s bill was undoubtedly the biggest ever for a single minister. The SLAF had made available a detailed report regarding the aircraft and helicopters made available to the former Minister.

Basil Rajapaksa didn’t seek nominations from the UPFA to contest the Aug. 17 parliamentary polls.

Sources alleged that the Secretary to the Economic Affairs Ministry as well as its accountant, too, were responsible for brazen violation of financial regulations.

Another white van extortion revealed

Another white van extortion revealed

Lankanewsweb.netDec 12, 2015
When the Maxwell Paranagama presidential commission gathered yesterday in search of the disappeared person another white van abduction and extortion payment given was revealed.

Following is the disclosure of a person who came to give evidence.
 
The witness’s brother was abducted in Jaffna Nalloor area on January 13th 2007. In order to release the brother the abductors have demanded Rs. three million. The abductors have taken the witnesses number from the abducted person. The witness party has told the abductors that they don’t have such an amount to pay. After 12 months the abductors have agreed to release the abducted person for Rs. one million.
 
However on February 7th 2008 the witness party has agreed to debit one million for the account given by the abductors and they produced the receipt to the commission today.
 
The witness party said even after giving one million, there is no news about his brother and due to the death threats imposed all during these days he remained silent.
 
The following is the bank receipt confirming the deposit.

India to get Japan's bullet train, deepens defence and nuclear ties

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (L) and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi shake hands while exchanging documents during a signing of agreement at Hyderabad House in New Delhi, India, December 12, 2015.REUTERS/ADNAN ABID
Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (front, 3rd L) and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi perform a religious ritual during evening prayers on the banks of the river Ganges in Varanasi, India, December 12, 2015.REUTERS/DANISH SIDDIQUI
Reuters Sat Dec 12, 2015
Japan will provide $12 billion of soft loans to build India's first bullet train, the two nations announced during a visit by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe that also yielded deeper defence ties and a plan for civil nuclear cooperation.
Relations have strengthened between Asia's second and third largest economies as Abe and Indian counterpart Narendra Modi seek to balance China's rise as the dominant Asian power. Both men are nationalists who enjoy a personal friendship.
The deal to build a high-speed train line between the financial hub of Mumbai and the city of Ahmedabad gives Japan an early lead over China, which is conducting feasibility studies for high speed trains on other parts of India's dilapidated rail network.
"This enterprise will launch a revolution in Indian railways and speed up India's journey into the future. It will become an engine of economic transformation in India," Modi said in a speech.
Japan has offered a "highly concessional loan" at an interest rate of 0.1 percent rate with repayment over 50 years and a moratorium for 15 years, Indian Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar told a news conference.
India will be buying a Japanese high-speed train system, effectively with an export credit of $12 billion.
Under defence deals announced on Saturday, the two sides will share technology, equipment and military information, but the long-awaited sale of Japanese aircraft in a deal worth about $1.1 billion was not concluded.
Similarly, while they agreed to work towards cooperation in civil-nuclear technology, they stopped short of signing an agreement, citing outstanding technical and legal differences.
Jaishankar did not cite a timeline for signing the final agreement with Japan.
Japan, the only country to have suffered a nuclear attack, has been demanding additional non-proliferation guarantees from India before it exports nuclear reactors.
India and Japan have been negotiating a nuclear energy deal since Japan's ally, the United States, opened the way for nuclear commerce with India despite its atomic bomb programme and shunning of the global Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
A final deal with Japan would also benefit U.S. firms. India has already given land for nuclear plants to GE-Hitachi - which is an alliance between the U.S. and Japanese firms - and to Toshiba's Westinghouse Electric Company.
"The memorandum we signed on civil nuclear energy cooperation is more than just an agreement for commerce and clean energy, it is a shining symbol of a new level of mutual confidence and strategic partnership in the cause of peaceful and secure world," Modi said.
"I know the significance of this decision for Japan and I assure you that India deeply respects that decision and will honour our shared commitment," Modi added.
In a joint statement the two prime ministers mentioned the South China Sea and "called upon all states to avoid unilateral actions that could lead to tensions in the region".
China claims most of the South China Sea, through which more than $5 trillion in global trade passes every year. Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei, the Philippines and Taiwan have rival claims.
New Delhi and Tokyo, both of which have territorial disputes with Beijing, have no claims in the waterway but worry about China's growing military reach into sea lanes through which much of Japan's shipborne trade passes. Abe and Modi called for freedom of navigation in international waters.
India and Japan have been holding talks for two years on the purchase by India of US-2 amphibious aircraft made by ShinMaywa Industries, which would be one of Japan's first arms sales since Abe lifted a 50-year ban on weapon exports.
Jaishankar said a purchase of US-2 was discussed in Saturday's meeting and the "matter remains under consideration".
(Editing by Frank Jack Daniel and Mark Heinrich)


Israel’s revenge demolitions only stiffen Palestinian resolve

The aftermath of the Israeli destruction of the al-Akkari family home on 2 December.Mahfouz Abu TurkAPA images




Palestinians throw stones at Israeli occupation forces in Shuafat in early October.Mahfouz Abu TurkAPA images

11 December 2015
When residents of Shuafat woke on 2 December to free-flowing traffic at the checkpoint where Israeli forces control movement to and from this overcrowded refugee camp, many were unnerved.
Ex-Islamic Jihad leader launches new armed group in Gaza

A Palestinian boy looks at a militant during a rally organized by Islamic Jihad in Rafah, Oct. 24, 2013.  (photo by REUTERS/Suhaib Salem)


Rasha Abou Jalal-June 10, 2014

Al-MonitorGAZA CITY, Gaza Strip — Those attending the funeral of Palestinian resistance member Nizar Issa, who was killed during an explosion at a resistance training center in the northern Gaza Strip on May 25, were surprised when Hisham Salem, a well-known figure in Gaza, declared the start of a new resistance movement in Palestine and proclaimed Issa as the first martyr in the ranks of this movement.

The new movement is called “Al-Sabirin [The Patient] for the Victory of Palestine,” or “Hosn” by its Arabic acronym. Its flag looks a lot like that of Lebanon's Hezbollah in form and color — the reason why Salem’s local opponents accused him of promoting a Shiite current — which raises significant concerns for Palestinians about an outbreak of sectarian strife in the Gaza Strip and turning Gaza into a second Iraq. 
What makes those accusations real for observers is the proliferation of YouTube videos showing Salem talking about historical events that are important to Shiites, such as the battle of Karbala and the killing of Imam Hussein.
These accusations and suspicions about Salem and his new movement are based on his historical organizational background. A source familiar with the Islamic Jihad movement said that Salem was regarded as “one of the leaders of Islamic Jihad in the northern province, but he was fired four years ago for [promoting sectarian strife].”
The source, who preferred to remain anonymous, told Al-Monitor that the nature of these ideas is to promote Shiite thought. He said, “This is bad for our reputation in Sunni Palestinian society, which rejects sectarian pluralism for fear of a sectarian war in Gaza.”
It was shown that the leadership of Islamic Jihad, despite its political closeness to Hezbollah and Iran, cannot withstand the promotion of sectarian Shiite thought in the Gaza Strip and wants to maintain the movement as Sunni, to be in line with the Sunni religious thought followed by Palestinian society.
Salem, who considers himself one of the most prominent leaders of the Hosn movement, spoke with Al-Monitor and confirmed that he was a former official in Islamic Jihad and that he was dismissed because of “differences in views,” without going into the nature of these differences.
He denied that his movement represents a split from Islamic Jihad, but he noted that his movement sees in Islamic Jihad’s founder Fathi al-Shaqaqi a father figure and an inspiration. He said, “[The movement] will preserve the embodiment of Shaqaqi’s ideas without any changes.”
Salem denied accusations that his movement is a Shiite current: “This is untrue. We have always believed in Islamic unity, and I see no reason to separate as Sunnis and Shiites.”
On the similarity of his movement’s banner with that of Hezbollah, he said, “This is an unintended coincidence. All the banners of the Palestinian factions are similar in terms of their content and symbols.”
Despite Salem’s insistence that his movement does not promote any Shiite ideas in the Gaza Strip, he strongly denounced the beliefs prevailing in Palestinian society that Shiites constitute an existential threat to the Sunni environment. He said, “I don’t think that Shiites don’t like Sunnis. I am suspicious of that. The Shiites are providing substantial assistance to the Sunnis, and an example of that is the historic Iranian support to Palestinian parties.”
He also defended his appearance in videos that were said to be promoting Shiite thought and said, “I’ve been talking about the two incidents of Karbala and Imam Hussein. They are not just for Shiites. It would be ignorance to link these events to [just] the Shiite current.”
About the sources of support for the Hosn movement, he pointed out that there is no solid support now. But Salem, who runs a charity association named al-Baqiyat al-Salihat, said that his association primarily relies on Iranian support. The Hamas movement had shut down the association in April 2011 for allegedly spreading Shiism.
Salem was arrested by the Hamas government in March 2013, with the daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat writing: “The internal security apparatus of the government arrested Salem, who is known to have good relations with the Shiites of Iran and Hezbollah.”
Salem confirmed that he was arrested twice by the Hamas government, attributing the arrest to a “misunderstanding” on the part of the government. He pointed out that he was also detained for 4½ years in the prisons of the Palestinian Authority before 2006.
Commenting on the announcement about Hosn’s launch, a Hamas official in the northern Gaza Strip, Atef Adwan, said, “This announcement came as a surprise to the government and the movement [Hamas] at various political and security levels. But we will not overdramatize the matter. We will put it in its natural context, because the birth of such a phenomena amid the confrontation with the occupation is not surprising.” He also said it’s likely that the new faction “will not be able to continue in the presence of giant organizations that fill the scene.”
Adwan stressed that Hamas “will not prevent any individual or group effort to resist the occupation.” He postponed any talk about the areas of cooperation with Hosn to the stage when its objectives, connections and funding are clear.
For his part, Hamas official Yahya Moussa denied the presence of currents promoting Shiite thought in Gaza, pointing out that such thought would “cripple the unity of the Palestinian people and fragment the Palestinian arena.”
Speaking to Al-Monitor, Moussa said, “It’s not normal that a man adopts a thought that is outside of the people’s [religion] and beliefs, especially since there is no historical Shiite [religious] reference in Gaza. Anything that promotes this ideology is a threat to our people and is in the interest of the occupation.”
The Hosn movement, according to Salem, has a shura council and an armed military wing, but the number of members is still unknown because he refuses to disclose this information. “I prefer not to reveal that now, but soon we will demonstrate to all our size, equipment and potential,” he said.
He said his movement was headed by a group of known Palestinian leaders, but he refused to identify them at this point.
The same source asserted that Salem is supported by dozens of individuals who have been dismissed from Islamic Jihad over the past years for “inciting sectarian prejudices.” The source believes that Sheikh Abdallah al-Shami, an official who had been ousted from Islamic Jihad five years ago, was one of the most prominent Hosn officials.
Political analyst Hassan Abdo said that the current environment in Gaza is not favorable for the announcement of a new resistance movement, pointing out that modern movements represent a “hasty and extreme ijtihad [interpretation] on the margins of the major movements and will not offer anything new.”
Abdo told Al-Monitor that the major movements arose when there was a true absence of resistance, and said, “But now I don’t think that such movements [would add anything new] because of the many Palestinian factions present.”
However, Salem said his movement “was launched to resist the occupation. … It is not a substitute for any organization, but complementary to [other organizations’] role.”
Salem did not rule out that his movement would exercise a political role in the future. “At the level of the internal Palestinian situation, we are ready to serve our people in various ways and areas. But at the level of the relationship with Israel, there is nothing between us except resistance,” he said.

Iraqi Shia militas protest against Turkey's troop deployment 

The demonstrations were primarily organised and participated by Shia armed factions linked to Iran
The protesters chanted: "With our soles, with our blood we will protect you Iraq" (MEE/Hadeer al-Sayeid)

Suadad al-Salhy's pictureSuadad al-Salhy-Saturday 12 December 2015
BAGHDAD - Thousands of mostly Shia paramilitary fighters took to the streets in Baghdad on Saturday to protest Turkey’s military deployment in northern Iraq and demanded its immediate withdrawal.
Middle East EyeThe demonstrators gathered in central Baghdad’s Tahrir Square wearing military uniforms and black suits. Throngs of women wearing the traditional abaya had put yellow scarves around their shoulders and waved yellow flags adorned with green graphics – a reference to the prominent Shiite militia Kataib Huzballa-Iraq. Other groups displayed a white flag that symbolizes another Shia militia - Asaib Ahl al-Haq. Many other demonstrators simply raised Iraqi flags and banners that read, "Erdogan, the thief of the neighbors' wealth" and "our sovereignty is our dignity".
The demonstrators chanted: "With our soles, with our blood we will protect you Iraq."
"This (demonstration) is a message for the government. The Iraqi people are able to protect their lands and maintain their sovereignty," Hussien al-Saadi, a Shiite commander told Middle East Eye while waving a small Iraqi flag.
Turkey deployed around 600 heavily armed troops last Thursday to a camp in Ba'ashiqa, a town near IS-controlled Mosul. The government of Iraq considered this action as a "violation of sovereignty" and has asked the Turkish authorities for an "immediate withdrawal" from the Iraqi soil.
Turkey's President Tayyip Erdogan shot back at a press conference that his troops were sent to northern Iraq to train Kurdish forces and that a withdrawal is "out of the question for the moment".
Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi delivered a televised speech on Friday, saying "Iraq…is being subjected to a flagrant violation of its sovereignty by a neighboring state (Turkey), so we have a right and a commitment to practice all the procedures to maintain its sovereignty and the unity of its soil". Abadi stressed in his speech that the Turkish "armed force" were "forcibly" deployed in northern Mosul.
Saturday's demonstrations were primarily organised and participated by Shia armed factions linked to Iran, including Badr, Asaib Ahl al-Haq, Kataib Huzballah and other small groups. Most of the commanders and political leaders of the participated groups are followers of the senior Iraqi Shia hardline cleric, Kadhim al-Haieri, who has been based in Iran since the 1970s.
"Being involved in battling Daiesh (another term for the Islamic State group) does not mean that we are not able to fight on another front. We fought the Americans before and we do not mind fighting the Turks this time," according to a fighter within the state-sponsored Shia-dominated Popular Mobilisation Force.
Shia militias linked to Iran make up the backbone of the Popular Mobilisation Force, a body established by the Iraqi government as an umbrella group for several sects and armed factions to combat against Islamic State (IS) militants.
"This our last peaceful message to Erdogan, if his troops do not leave northern Iraq, our fighters' hands will reach them," Abu Talib al-Saiedi, a commander of Kataib Huzballah-Iraq militia told MEE.
"We as Kataib Huzballah-Iraq say if you (the Turks) do not listen to this demonstration, we will force you to hear the voice of our rifle and IEDs," al-Saiedi added.  
The Islamic State group seized more than a third of the Iraqi territories in the northern and western parts of the country last year, but Iraqi security forces and Kurdish Peshmerga backed by the Shia militias and the US-led coalition air strikes have gained back control, including the provinces of Salahudeen in northern Baghdad and Anbar in western Baghdad.
Iraq’s government on Friday forwarded a complaint to the UN Security Council after a Turkish delegation arrived in Baghdad to "discuss the repercussions of the recent crisis" between the two countries, but left without giving any guarantees that Turkey will pull out its troops, Iraqi officials said.
Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, one of the most prominent Shia cleric in Iraq said on Friday that the government is responsible for protecting the country’s sovereignty. He urged people to show restraint towards foreign residents in Iraq.  
"The Iraqi government is responsible for protecting Iraq's sovereignty and must not tolerate and side that infringes upon on it, whatever the justifications and necessities," Sheikh Abdul al-Mehdi al-Karbala'i, one of Sistani's representatives, said during the Friday prayer.
Iraqi Shiite militias including Badr, Kataib and Asaib have threatened to target all Turkish interests and citizens in Iraq.
"You are not stronger than the Americans," Hadi al-Aamiri, the prominent Shia leader and the head of Badr Shia militia, said to Turkish leaders in a televised ceremony last week:
"The Americans were forced to leave and you will be forced, too,” he added.
- See more at: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/iraqi-shia-militas-protest-against-turkeys-troop-deployment-396824842#sthash.TUvNUDpA.dpuf

Prophet Muhammad and his Message

propt_M
by Reeza Hameed
( December 10, 2015, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Today marks the death anniversary of Prophet Muhammad. It is an appropriate time to ponder over the man and his message.


Imperialism, the “war on terror” and anti-Muslim hysteria

http://spanish.fansshare.com/
Donald Trump Duct Tape Funny
Andre Damon-9 December 2015

On Monday, Donald Trump, the billionaire candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, called for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States” following the terror attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, California. This is only the latest in a series of increasingly fascistic and violent demands from the Republican frontrunner.
Although he went farther than other members of the US political establishment, Trump’s call was in line with remarks by other politicians, including Republican Senator Ted Cruz, who called for a ban on Muslim, but not Christian, refugees from Syria last month, and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, who said he had ordered state police to place mosques under surveillance.
David Bowers, the Democratic Party mayor of Roanoke, Virginia, last month approvingly invoked America’s history of interning Japanese Americans in concentration camps during the Second World War. “It appears that the threat of harm to America from ISIS now is just as real and serious as that from our enemies then,” Bowers declared.
The resurgence of such reactionary political demands in the United States is mirrored in the other imperialist countries. In Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron has branded opponents of the authorization of war in Syria as “terrorist sympathizers.” In France, Marine Le Pen's neo-fascist National Front (FN) received the largest share of the vote in this week’s regional elections, amidst the effective abrogation of democratic rights by the government of President François Hollande and the promotion of a climate of fear and hysteria in the wake of the November 13 attacks in Paris.
Throughout Europe, there has been a deliberate whipping up of anti-Muslim chauvinism in response to the refugee crisis, as all the major powers seek to justify their plans for the expansion of war in Syria.
In the US, the statements by Trump have been met with self-righteous indignation by politicians and media figures, who claim they are shocked by his statements. Who are they kidding? The blathering of this fascistic imbecile expresses only in more concentrated form the perpetual hysteria one hears every day in the media. The difference between Trump and someone like CNN’s Wolf Blitzer is just a matter of degree. He is the product of a diseased political environment.
As for Obama, in his national address on Sunday, the president postured as a critic of Republican calls for targeting Muslims. Yet the Obama administration is responsible for the continuation of an imperialist policy in the Middle East that has devastated entire countries, with at least a million people, mainly Muslim, killed in the process.
The unleashing of the forces of extreme reaction is, in fact, an organic expression of the nature of imperialism itself. As Lenin stressed , imperialism is “reaction all down the line.” Writing in the midst of World War I, he wrote, “The difference between the democratic-republican and the reactionary-monarchist imperialist bourgeoisie is obliterated precisely because they are both rotting alive.” The putrefaction of contemporary capitalist society—based on parasitism, financial swindling, war and looting—is once again spewing up political filth in the form of racist demagogy.
The whole experience of the 20th century has demonstrated the fact that imperialist war is always accompanied by attacks on democratic rights and the whipping up of xenophobia. American involvement in World War I, nominally undertaken by Woodrow Wilson to make the world safe for democracy, brought with it the lynching of workers and the imprisonment of socialist leaders including Eugene V. Debs, followed by the anti-socialist Palmer Raids.
The period leading up to and during World War II brought with it unspeakable horrors, including the rise of fascism and the Nazi Party’s “final solution,” which led to the murder of 11 million people and the extermination of a large section of European Jewry. In the United States, the administration of Franklin Roosevelt oversaw the internment of Japanese Americans and the imprisonment of leading members of the Trotskyist movement under the Smith Act.
The period of the Korean War was the heyday of McCarthyite witch-hunts of socialists in the trade unions and entertainment industry. The French colonial war in Algeria brought the country to the brink of civil war, including the massacre of peaceful demonstrators and the invocation of a state of emergency. During the Vietnam War, the FBI in the US massively infiltrated political organizations and oversaw assassinations of oppositional figures, including leading members of the Black Panthers.
During every imperialist war, the ruling class seeks to cultivate the most backward and racist sentiments. The “war on terror,” which has led to the deaths of at least a million Muslims, is no different, creating an environment in which racist hysteria is relentlessly promoted in the media.
The deep social roots of the drive to war and the attack on democratic rights are demonstrated by the fact that the end of the Bush administration did not lead to a significant change in course. In fact, the abrogation of democratic rights continued under Obama, whose particular contribution was the institutionalization of state-sponsored murder as a central plank of American foreign policy.
The political impotence of what counts for contemporary liberalism, as well as the various pseudo-left organizations, is a result of the fact that they are deeply implicated in promoting and justifying war and militarism.
There is not widespread or deep-rooted popular support for the conceptions advocated by Trump and the political establishment as a whole, despite the constant barrage of media propaganda. But the organized expression of anti-imperialist and democratic sentiments depends on the independent political mobilization of the working class on the basis of a program directed at the source of war and political reaction: the capitalist system.
Andre Damon

Chinese Authorities Orchestrate Surprise Raid of Labor NGOs in Guangdong, Arresting Leaders

Who the activists are, and why the government is striking hard against their NGOs

By Yaxue Cao, published: December 10, 2015
劳工NGO交流会
Chinese police on December 3 began a series of sudden raids of labor rights organizations in Guangdong, questioning at least 25 staff members and managers of about five organizations, according to labor activists and lawyers in the area.
Saudi women vote for the first time

Women in Saudi Arabia voted in elections for the first time on Saturday, Dec. 12. The Post's Brian Murphy is in Riyadh covering the historic election. (Monica Akhtar and Jason Aldag/The Washington Post)
December 12
 The first Saudi women ever to cast ballots in the kingdom hugged, took souvenir selfies and spoke cautiously of more openings during groundbreaking elections Saturday that marked another step in social reforms but failed to stir a major turnout at the polls.
Women candidates and female voters cast their ballots for the first time ever in Saudi Arabia's local municipal elections on Saturday, Dec.12. (Reuters)

Paris climate deal is an 'opportunity to change the world'

François Hollande urges delegates to adopt agreement set to provide strong push towards curbing global warming


  Video: ‘The world is counting on Paris climate talks,’ says Fabius

, and  in Paris-Saturday 12 December 2015

The Paris climate deal is an “opportunity to change the world”, François Hollande has said as he urged negotiators at the UN talks to adopt the final text of an agreement that will provide powerful momentum to efforts to curb climate change.

Hollande on climate talks: a decisive agreement for our planet is here

The French president said: “We have to take that last step; the step that would enable us to reach our goal. And this would be a decisive step.”

France’s foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, who led the negotiations, said: “Today we are close to the final outcome. It is my deep conviction that we have come up with an ambitious and balanced agreement. Today it is a moment of truth.” He hailed the agreement as a “historic turning point” in climate negotiations that have gone on for decades.
The wording, which has been haggled over by politicians and officials during two weeks of intensive talks, embeds promises from 185 countries to reduce emissions – sufficient to limit warming to somewhere between 2.7C and 3.7Cabove pre-industrial levels. It also initiates regular national reviews and global “stocktakes” to try to increase these greenhouse gas cuts enough to curb warming to less than 2C above pre-industrial levels, or even 1.5C in the longer term. But the French hosts said the final text would not be released until 12.30pm local time.
Critics will argue that, as it stands, the deal condemns the planet to catastrophic climate changes that will wipe out entire island nations. But supporters say the talks have made major progress in formalising significant carbon cuts that can be built on in future negotiations and send a signal to global investors about the momentum behind clean energy and carbon-reducing projects.
Six years after the Copenhagen climate talks ended in chaos and recriminations, the final text was agreed provisionally on Saturday morning after negotiations went through the night. A phone call between the US president, Barack Obama, and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, and appeals from Hollande and the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, helped to push countries towards agreeing the final draft.
It must now be formally adopted by the full plenary session at the talks and requires unanimous agreement. This is set to take place on Saturday afternoon and evening, and objections at this stage could still scupper a final deal.
But Ban urged countries to finalise the deal. “We have come to a final moment of a journey that has been going on for decades,” he said. “The end now is in sight. Let us now finish the job. The whole world is watching.”
In a speech to the plenary session on Saturday morning that was punctuated by enthusiastic applause, Fabius piled pressure on countries that were holding out by invoking the ghosts of Copenhagen. “Nobody here wants a repeat of what happened in Copenhagen,” he said. “Today, if unfortunately we were to fail, how could we rebuild this hope?” He said failure would mean that “trust in the very ability of the concert of nations” to act on climate would be irrevocably lost. 
“The very credibility of multilateralism … this is what is at stake. Quite clearly this text, the one we have built together, our text, is the best possible balance; a balance that will allow each group of countries to go back home with his head held high having achieved something important.”
The negotiations have struck a careful diplomatic trade-off between the need to pull developing countries with high emissions, such as China and India, into the pollution-curbing agreement and the demands by poorer nations that rich countries continue to take the lead in reducing their own carbon pollution. They also want the rich world to help pay for the efforts of the developing world and the impact of current warming. 
The deal also recognises the fierce campaign waged by island states and vulnerable countries for an agreement that acknowledges that science says 2C of warming is already dangerous and 2.7C disastrous.
Scientists say 2.7C of warming will have catastrophic consequences, including rises in sea level that would inundate low-lying regions and islands, cause more floods, heatwaves and forest fire conditions, reductions in cropland, and ocean acidification that will severely damage coral reefs.
But even more than the political process to review and ratchet up greenhouse gas cuts to meet the scientific requirements, it is hoped that the Paris pact will send a clear signal to financial investors that the shift to clean energy sources is inevitable.
Key elements of the potential deal include:
  • Holding global average temperatures to less than 2C above pre-industrial levels and to “pursue efforts” to limit temperature increases to 1.5C.
  • A non-binding decision for countries to review their national targets in 2020 and then every five years with a view to increasing their greenhouse gas cuts, and to hold regular global stocktakes of progress towards the collective temperature goal.
  • A recognition that the $100bn a year in climate finance promised by 2020 should be a floor for ongoing assistance, and that the provision of finance should be regularly reviewed along with the national greenhouse gas reduction targets, with a new financing goal to be agreed by 2025.
  • A recognition that many countries will suffer losses and damage from the effects of climate change, but which specifically excludes any liability or compensation claims as a result of the agreement.