Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, November 7, 2015

Elections in Burma: fine for now, but that may change in the coming days

Supporters of Burma's opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy (NLD) party attend a rally in Mandalay earlier this week. Pic: AP. 

Aung San Suu Kyi. Pic: Michele Penna.
by Michele Penna-7th November 2015
AMONG the many individuals and institutions that are keeping a close eye on Burma’s elections, a special place is reserved for ‘observer’ organizations, groups tasked with monitoring how the electoral process unfolds.

India: Why I Am Returning My Award

Indian writer and political activist Arundhati Roy

by ARUNDHATI ROY
( November 6, 2015, New Delhi, Sri Lanka Guardian) Although I do not believe that awards are a measure of the work we do, I would like to add the National Award for Best Screenplay that I won in 1989 to the growing pile of returned awards. Also, I want to make it clear that I am not returning this award because I am “shocked” by what is being called the “growing intolerance” being fostered by the present government. First of all, “intolerance” is the wrong word to use for the lynching, shooting, burning and mass murder of fellow human beings. Second, we had plenty of advance notice of what lay in store for us — so I cannot claim to be shocked by what has happened after this government was enthusiastically voted into office with an overwhelming majority. Third, these horrific murders are only a symptom of a deeper malaise. Life is hell for the living too. Whole populations — millions of Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims and Christians — are being forced to live in terror, unsure of when and from where the assault will come.
We had plenty of advance notice of what lay in store for us — so I cannot claim to be shocked by what has happened after this government was enthusiastically voted into office.


Today, we live in a country in which, when the thugs and apparatchiks of the New Order talk of “illegal slaughter”, they mean the imaginary cow that was killed — not the real man who was murdered. When they talk of taking “evidence for forensic examination” from the scene of the crime, they mean the food in the fridge, not the body of the lynched man. We say we have “progressed”, but when Dalits are butchered and their children burned alive, which writer today can freely say, like Babasaheb Ambedkar once did, that “to the untouchables, Hinduism is a veritable chamber of horrors”, without getting attacked, lynched, shot or jailed? Which writer can write what Saadat Hasan Manto wrote in his “Letters to Uncle Sam”? It doesn’t matter whether we agree or disagree with what is being said. If we do not have the right to speak freely, we will turn into a society that suffers from intellectual malnutrition, a nation of fools. Across the subcontinent it has become a race to the bottom — one that the New India has enthusiastically joined. Here too now, censorship has been outsourced to the mob.
I am very pleased to have found (from somewhere way back in my past) a National Award that I can return, because it allows me to be a part of a political movement initiated by writers, filmmakers and academics in this country who have risen up against a kind of ideological viciousness and an assault on our collective IQ that will tear us apart and bury us very deep if we do not stand up to it now. I believe what artists and intellectuals are doing right now is unprecedented, and does not have a historical parallel. It is politics by other means. I am so proud to be part of it. And so ashamed of what is going on in this country today.
Postscript: For the record, I turned down the Sahitya Akademi Award in 2005 when the Congress was in power. So please spare me that old Congress-versus-BJP debate. It has gone way beyond all that. Thanks.

Modi pledges 800 billion rupees in relief and development for Kashmir

Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses a rally in a cricket stadium in Srinagar, November 7, 2015.
Indian policemen frisk Kashmiri men at the entrance of the cricket stadium where Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is scheduled to address a rally in Srinagar, November 7, 2015.

ReutersBY FAYAZ BUKHARI-Sat Nov 7, 2015 
Prime Minister Narendra Modi pledged 800 billion rupees ($12.10 billion) in funds to bolster development and economic growth in Kashmir, a year after the worst flooding in more than a century destroyed half a million homes there.
Addressing several thousand people in a cricket stadium in the northern state's capital of Srinagar, Modi said he wanted to go beyond helping flood victims. He promised to create jobs for Kashmiri youth by improving education and promoting industries, including tourism and cashmere wool.
"The biggest task at hand here is to find work for the youth of Kashmir and Ladakh ... our youth should get the cheapest and the best education, and of global standards," he said. Ladakh is another mountainous region in the north.
Saturday's visit is Modi's first this year to the disputed territory which has been plagued by militant violence for years. Nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan both claim Kashmir in full but rule it in part.
Violence in India's only Muslim-majority region has eased significantly from levels in the 1990s, when armed revolt against Indian rule erupted.
Kashmiris have been protesting against a lack of central aid for last year's floods that the state government estimates caused $16 billion of damage.
Security forces in Kashmir detained nearly 400 separatists on Friday to prevent them from holding an anti-government protest march during Modi's visit.
Hours before Modi's rally, in footage screened on national television, police detained an independent parliamentarian, Engineer Rashid, for protesting with black flags.
Security was tight with paramilitary forces and sharpshooters deployed, while schools and colleges were shut. Internet services were suspended hours before Modi arrived.
In his 40-minute speech, Modi highlighted progress, promising improved road and rail networks, as well as branches of India's prestigious management and technology institutes.
"Kashmir has suffered a lot ... the dreams of several generations have been shattered, but I have the confidence that my Kashmir will rise again," he said.
Comparing the devastation from the floods to that in his home state of Gujarat after an earthquake in 2001, Modi said: "thousands died ... homes were destroyed ... nobody believed we would be able to rebuild so quickly."
India accuses Pakistan of backing the separatist militants fighting security forces in Indian Kashmir. Pakistan denies that saying it only offers diplomatic support to Kashmir's suppressed Muslims.

(Writing by Zeba Siddiqui in Mumbai; Editing by Robert Birsel)

TalkTalk hack - new details emerge

Channel 4 NewsTHURSDAY 05 NOVEMBER 2015

It was one of the biggest hacks in recent history - more than a million people's sensitive data stolen and tonight - we've got inside information about how it could have been carried out.

Hackers who claim they were in on the TalkTalk hack from the start have raised serious questions about the security of one of Britain's biggest brands.
The world of cybercrime is a murky one - identities are hard to pin down, and facts not easy to verifyChannel 4 News spoke to four people within the hacking world who claim they watched the TalkTalk hack unfold - and one even took part.

They've all described the same chain of events - and if it's true, it shows how easy it is to break into a multi-million pound company.

TalkTalk say they found out about the hack on Wed 22 October, but our sources say the break-in started days before.

"It was in a Skype group call...with a lot of laughing and making fun of TalkTalk," one hacker claimed.

In that call, one of the hackers allegedly shared a flaw in TalkTalk's website - it allowed access to the company's customer database.

Once leaked, it's claimed multiple hackers used it to pull out names, email addresses and more.

"It got passed around... at least 25 people had access to it," they explained.

So how could the group find the hole in TalkTalk's website? The short answer is - by using Google.

It's possible to use Google to find flaws in websites - you enter in some code, and it throws up a list of vulnerable sites.

Its really low level stuff, such tactics shouldn't work against a big company's site. Even the hackers were surprised.

One hacker said; "I was shocked".

The same hacker claimed he tried to warn the company: "I tweeted TalkTalk about an hour before everything happened and they weren't interested, so I thought f*** them, their security is their problem".

He claims he's now deleted his tweet.

So why did they do it?

"There was no group, it was just a few friends laughing about a company with bad security."

"It's fun for us"

Not so much fun for TalkTalk customers, some of whom have reported being targeted by scammers in sophisticated fraud campaigns.

Police are still investigating the hack and have arrested four people, including three teenagers. No-one has yet been charged.

A spokesperson for TalkTalk has told Channel 4 News; "TalkTalk is taking these issues very seriously, and is co-operating fully with the police investigation.

"It has however been asked by the police not to make any further comment while the investigation is under way, and can therefore only say that the information included in this report has not been verified and is in some respects materially inaccurate."

Why Suicide Is Such a Hot Topic

DEPRESSION
The Huffington Post
Tara Sonenshine Headshot-05/17/2015
It is hard to pick up a book, a newspaper, or an online story these days without running into suicide. Today's New York Times has two stories related to suicide -- "What's Lurking Behind the Suicides," about Native Americans taking their lives; and a slightly more upbeat story called, "No Longer Wanting to Die," about interventions that work for suicidal thoughts. (I am currently writing a book review for the New York Journal of Books on a novel called A Cure For Suicide.)
Many of us ask ourselves, are the number of suicides going up, or is the media just telling us more about them? And is the United States alone in this, or are other countries also experiencing high levels of self-imposed death?
Each year, more than 40,000 Americans take their own lives, and in 2013, suicide rates were highest among people ages 45 to 64, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Last year a CDC study, which looked at 2012 U.S. mortality data, found Americans expected to live longer than ever but that the rate for suicide increased 2.4 percent. We are experiencing, as a nation, the highest rates of suicide in more than 25 years. The suicide rate is now 12.6 suicide deaths per 100,000 Americans, which is close to the rate of 12.8 in 1987.
What we also know from data is that suicide is disturbingly common among young people. Shockingly, suicide is the second leading cause of death among young people in the U.S., after unintentional injury. More specifically, according to the most recent data available, suicide is the second leading cause of death among people ages 15 to 34, and the third leading cause of death among people ages 10 to 14. Although young men between the ages of 10 and 24 are taking their own lives less often than they did 20 years ago, the suicide rate among young women is slightly higher than it was in 1994.
Suicide and thoughts about suicide start early. About 17 percent of high school students in the U.S. say that they have seriously considered suicide, and 8 percent say that they have made an attempt. Overall, at least 25 percent of children and adolescents have suicidal thoughts at some point during their lives.
Why does suicide occur?
The factors leading to suicide are as complex as human nature. According to the CDC, warning signs of suicide include a family history of suicide, a history of depression or other mental illness, a history of alcohol or drug abuse, a stressful life event or loss, as well as exposure to other people's suicidal behaviors. We also have to take into account post traumatic stress disorder, especially for returning veterans, economic distress and social dislocation. Lastly, we can't ignore the growing movement around death with dignity for those with terminal illnesses who want to choose to die.
The good news about all this is that we actually have better and more reporting about mental distress. For example, in the past few years more media reporting and research have appeared on the role of bullying -- particularly cyber bullying and suicide. The CDC has a Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System -- a biannual questionnaire of teens in grades 9-12 in all 50 states constructed to provide a representative sample of high school students in the United States. In a study on bullying in the United States, one team reports that depression and suicide are much more common in teens who have been the victim of bullying in school and/or electronically. Moreover, these risks were additive among teens who were the victim of both forms of bullying.
The United States is not alone in the area of suicides. More than 800,000 people die by suicide every year -- around one person every 40 seconds, according to WHO's first global report on suicide prevention. Some 75 percent of suicides occur in low- and middle-income countries. Globally, suicide rates are highest in people aged 70 years and over. (In some countries, however, the highest rates are found among the young. Notably, suicide is the second leading cause of death in 15-29 year old people globally. In many parts of the world, the subject of suicide remains taboo. Only 30 countries in the world have national suicide prevention strategies.
What role do media play in the issue of suicide? Media coverage of suicides has grown both online and in traditional media outlets. Social networking has raised the level and preponderance of discussion of depression and suicide. Colleges and universities are paying more attention to the problem and recognizing the need for more on-campus resources. We also tend to hear more stories about suicide in "clusters" these days because of a phenomenon called "suicide clustering -- the instance of several consecutive suicides in a single window of time and space, and usually in one geographic region.)
Is media sensationalizing suicide?
Some studies have speculated that the way media report suicide may glamorize the act and promote imitation suicide behavior, but most experts say not talking about suicide ultimately prevents people who need help from coming forward. The truth is the media deserves credit for bringing the issue of suicide to light. Reducing the stigma of mental illness is half the battle. Removing taboos and encouraging open conversation is a positive step. We need more articles about depression, not less.
Suicide is not a happy topic but we need to hear about it and talk about. This is one issue where media can have a good impact. So, let's keep up the dialogue.
Tara D. Sonenshine is a lecturer at George Washington University and a practitioner of public diplomacy and public affairs.

Friday, November 6, 2015

PTA detainees in Sri Lanka: Prospects for justice

The fast by prisoners last month has given rise to fresh debate about justice for them. It is a sad reflection on Sri Lankan people and the new Government that the prisoners had to resort to such drastic action in order to even gain momentum for justice; for what is a categorical breach of these individuals’ fair trial rights and a failure of the criminal justice system. It has been reported that the fast was called off based on assurances by the President to offer a solution by 7 November 2015. However, what the President will offer as a solution is not clear.

Political Participation Of Oppressed Castes & The Need For A Progressive Political Tamil Nationalism

By Thanges Paramsothy –November 5, 2015
Thanges Paramsothy
Thanges Paramsothy
Colombo Telegraph
The question of why a single person from oppressed caste groups could not become as a member of parliament in the last parliamentary election held on 17th August 2015 has not yet been asked or answered. Seven members of parliament from Jaffna electoral division were selected as qualified members according to the population ratio. Among them, a single member is not from the oppressed caste groups, while such caste groups occupy more than half of the Jaffna population. However, only two individuals from oppressed caste, Pallar, out of thirty-eight members have become as members of northern provincial council in the last election held on 21st September 2013.
The criticism against the TNA is that they appoint one person from the oppressed castes as a candidate at every parliamentary election in order to show that they are ‘casteless’ in their selection process of the candidates. However, the past experience shows that the person who was selected as a contesting candidate in the TNA would be as a potential loser than a winner.
The criticism against the TNA is that they appoint one person from the oppressed castes as a candidate at every parliamentary election in order to show that they are ‘casteless’ in their selection process of the candidates. However, the past experience shows that the person who was selected as a contesting candidate in the TNA would be as a potential loser than a winner.
My recent study conducted in two regions in Jaffna namely Pungudutivu and Mallakam indicates that more than half of the population are from five oppressed caste groups such as Nalavar, Pallar, Paraiyar, Ampattar and Vannar. We do not have Jaffna population breakdown in terms of caste. However, it is quite clear that a large number of people from dominant caste, Vellalar, have migrated overseas using their extended socio-economic and educational networks since the independence of Sri Lanka. The majority of Tamil diaspora population in abroad composed of an overwhelming majority of the Vellalar (Daniel & Thangaraj 1995; McDowell 1996, 1999). This has changed the traditional demographic proportion of Jaffna and made the Vellalar as one of the minorities in numerical terms. The study conducted indicates that the Vellalar population consists of 30% of the population in the two regions. As of 1950s, it was estimated that half of the Jaffna population (50%) was from Vellalar caste (Banks 1960). This shows that 20% of Vellalar population in Jaffna peninsula has migrated to overseas or other part of the country. Even though the findings of the study on the composition of caste population in two regions in Jaffna cannot be simply generalised to the entire Jaffna peninsula, they can be taken as potential samples. It also makes sense due to the overwhelming migration of dominant caste Vellalar to the affluent western countries. Nevertheless, the Vellalar domination has been consistently remaining in Tamil nationalist politics.
The five oppressed castes groups, who are now majority in numerical terms, are in a position to become as potential political leaders in Tamil nationalist politics. Apart from the numerical strength of oppressed castes, they also have a higher record in their educational achievement, socioeconomic mobility. However, they still fail to become as active participants in the Tamil nationalist politics. A number of left movements functioned among Tamils before the armed ethnic conflict had contributed in demolishing “untouchability” to a great extent from Tamil society. However, they did not mobilise the oppressed castes to question/challenge the Vellalar-led Tamil nationalist politics that in number of instances fails to take affirmative actions against internal backwardness and discrimination in terms of caste, gender, class and religion. The question arises why are the oppressed castes unable to enter into the Tamil political mainstream? To what extent does the Vellalar-led Tamil national political system work to include the oppressed caste persons as their potential leaders? In order to answer these questions, we need to analyse the Tamil national political trend and the psyche of both oppressed and dominant caste groups.                                              Read More
The Solheim claim: ‘Mahinda planned to offer 

the North to Prabhakaran’ 


Solheim had even used somewhat undiplomatic language to explain his  allegation. ‘Rajapaksa wanted to do a backroom deal to make Prabhakaran  the leader there. He portrayed himself as the great saviour of the  Sinhalese, but was ready for any dirty deal for his own survival if it  helped his political fortunes’, Solheim had said, according to some newspaper reports.


2015-11-06
Former Norwegian Development Minister and peace envoy to Sri Lanka, Erik Solheim dropped this bombshell days ago claiming that former President Mahinda Rajapaksa had been willing to give self-rule to Tamils without calling for elections in the North.

Recalling his engagement in Sri Lanka at the launch of Mark Salter’s book “To End a Civil War – Norway’s Peace Engagement with Sri Lanka” at the University of London on October 28, he had said that Rajapaksa had told him that he was ready to hand over the North to Prabhakaran ‘as he did not want a long and protracted peace process, which would undermine his support in the South’.

This allegation came in the wake of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe accusing Rajapaksa in  Parliament that the latter had given money to the LTTE to prevent the northern Tamil people from voting at the 2005 presidential election and also implying a connection between this transaction and the assassination of former Foreign Minister Laxman Kadirgamar. Hence, the deafening silence maintained by the former president and his loyalists to the former Norwegian minister’s utterance is perplexing. Needless to say Mahinda Rajapaksa had committed a lot of blunders in his dealings with the minority communities in the country and also international forces. After the end of the war, he was not amenable to the Tamil leaders’ suggestion  to appoint a civilian governor to the Northern Province. He antagonised the Muslims by turning a blind eye to the actions of some religious extremists which ultimately paved the way for his downfall. He also provoked the international players by giving various promises and later going back on them.

However, it was extremely unlikely that Rajapaksa who was not prepared even to hold the Northern Provincial Council election after the war until he was pressurised by the UNHRC to hand over the administration of the North to Prabhakaran without an election. Even if Solheim was correct in quoting Rajapaksa, the claim was self-contradictory. It is simple logic that Rajapaksa would not have committed political suicide by offering the North to Prabhakaran, had he thought, as Solheim had claimed, that even ‘a long and protracted peace process would undermine his support in the South’.

The undiplomatic nature of some of the comments made by the former Norwegian minister,whether they were true or not, must be the result of his somewhat bitter last encounters with the former president. To mention a case in point, during an interview former “The Hindu” Editor N. Ram had with Mahinda Rajapaksa in July 2009 the latter’s secretary Lalith Weeratunge had intervened to say:  “It was about March 2006 when Mr. Solheim came to see H.E. after he became president and had also said, in the midst of other things: ‘Prabhakaran is a military genius. I have seen him in action etc., etc. to which the President had responded: ‘He is from the jungles of the North. I am from the jungles of the South. Let’s see who will win!’ It was very prophetic. Later the President met Minister Solheim in New York and reminded him of their conversation on the ‘military geniuses,’ of the jungles of the North and South, and who would win. The East had by that time, in 2007, been cleared and the President had said: ‘Now see what’s going to happen in the North,[ it will be ]the same.”

In fact it was not Rajapaksa but former President Chandrika Kumaratunga who had offered to hand over the North to Prabhakarana for ten years with the condition that the LTTE was decommissioned after the collapse of the peace talks between her government and the LTTE during her first tenure between 1994 and 1999. That offer came under stiff resistance from both the nationalists in the North as well as the South and faded away with the passage of time.
Had Solheim taken Rajapaksa’s purported plan to offer the North to Prabhakaran so seriously to place it before the world after so many years, it points to the fact that Norwegians did not have a clear picture of the leading players and the situation in Sri Lanka at the time when they attempted to bring  peace to the island. This is further evidenced by another remark Solheim had made at the London book launch. He had said; “the peace process in Sri Lanka broke down due to the bickering between the SLFP and the UNP’. It is true that the UNF government of Premier Ranil Wickremesinghe and the then President Chandrika Kumaratunga traded various accusations then against each other over the peace process, but the two parties also had an understanding on the process despite their public pronouncements. 

When the LTTE leaders and the UNF government delegation led by Minister G.L. Peiris agreed to explore a solution to the ethnic problem based on a federal structure at the Oslo round of peace talks, President Kumaratunga’s response was that it was she who had proposed a federal solution first through her draft constitution presented to Parliament in August 2000. No protests were held immediately or later by any of the Sinhalese nationalist groups against the Oslo federal agreement. Hence there was no bickering between the UNF and the SLFP that might have affected the peace process.

While referring to the allegation of the UNP-SLFP bickering, the Norwegian peace envoy contradicted himself at the event when he said; ‘In 2002, Ranil Wickremasinghe’s new government was ready to talk with the LTTE with the blessings of then President Chandrika Kumaratunga; but that opportunity was missed due to Prabhakaran’s fault’.

However, his assessment of the LTTE leader by all means seems to be correct. He had said; “There was lack of vision on the part of Prabhakaran. He had a violent response for every issue’ while pointing out ‘except for Anton Balasingham, nobody else within the LTTE had international exposure. The downfall of the LTTE was due to an isolated war lord sitting there basically taking all the decisions not based on proper information’.

This statement on the LTTE leadership was vindicated by another statement made last week by one time Prabhakaran’s second-in-command, former Deputy Minister Vinayagamoorthi Muralitharan alias Karuna Amman during an interview with the Indian Express when he had reportedly said; “Prabhakaran was a good man, but he had no knowledge of globalisation.”  - See more at: http://www.dailymirror.lk/94225/the-solheim-claim-mahinda-planned-to-offer-the-north-to-prabhakaran#sthash.YqSqDqxy.dpuf

‘Venda Lenin’ pseudo socialist Rajapakse stooge arrested : Shameless and ’faceless’ yet identified ! full story……


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -06.Nov.2015, 6.30PM) Premakumara Gunaratnam alias Noel Mudalige, is the infamous Australian citizen who violated the Immigration and emigration laws of the country while citing bogus reasons in defence, and in collusion  with the corrupt and machiavellian  Rajapakses broke  the laws flagrantly and with absolute impunity , while instigating the students in the country to engage in violence which were part of  Rajapakse conspiracies .Though he  pretended  he was acting in the best  interests of students, in fact all those actions were geared to achieve his cheap self seeking  political aims and  agendas, as well  as to  serve Rajapakses’ evil political  goals, was at last arrested by the police yesterday, and remanded until the 18 th after being produced before court.
Tea protest

2015-11-06


National conference of tea smallholders today staged a demonstration outside Fort Railway Station urging that their issues be resolved. Pix by Nisal Baduge











Expulsion of Northern Muslims Wasn’t Ethnic Cleansing, Says Ex-TNA MP

The New Indian ExpressBy P.K. Balachndran-04th November 2015
COLOMBO: The en-masse expulsion of Muslims from Sri Lanka’s Northern Province by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in October-November 1990, was not “ethnic cleansing” but a measure to “protect” them,  argues P.Ariyanetthiran, a former Tamil National Alliance (TNA) MP from the Eastern District of Batticaloa.   
"It could not be described as ethnic cleansing because it was to be  temporary. The Muslims were told that they would be allowed to come back after the successful conclusion of the war for a separate Tamil Eelam. The properties and personal effects seized from the Muslims were to be kept safely and given back on their return. But this did not happen because the struggle for Tamil Eelam failed and the seized properties fell into the hands of the government forces,” Ariyanetthiran told Express.
On the demand of TNA MP M.A.Sumanthiran that the Northern Provincial Council should apologize to the Muslims through a resolution, he said: “There is no need to apologize now because, in the course of the war, the LTTE had publicly apologized and said that the Muslims could come back.” 
Explaining the background to the expulsion of 75,000 to 90,000 Muslims from the six districts of the Northern Province, Ariyanetthiran said that Muslims were asked to quit en masse “for their own protection” in view of the anti-Tamil activities of Muslims in the Eastern Province at the instigation of the Lankan  government and military. 
Muslims were being used as spies. The Sinhalese-Muslim Home Guards killed Tamils. Army-sponsored units like “Green Tigers” terrorized Tamils. According to D.B.S.Jeyaraj, there was a shady army intelligence unit under one “Capt.Munas”, who turned to be Richard Dias, a Sinhalese army officer. 
Ariyanetthiran said that up to 1000 Tamils lost their lives in attacks at Valathaapitti, Veeracholai, Savalaikadai, Malligaithivu, Chatturukondaan, Veeramunai, Vandaarumoolai, and Puthukudiyiruppu. Muslim gangs had destroyed or desecrated Hindu temples in Ottamaavadi, Kalmunai, Sainthamaruthu and Ninthavur.
According to Jaffna TNA MP D.Siddharthan, the LTTE expelled Northern Muslims, even though these had done no harm to the Tamils, because it wanted to seize  their properties. 
Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF) leader V.Anandasangaree said that it is wrong to ask the entire Tamil community to apologize for the doings of the LTTE. According to him, Northern Tamils had no problem with the Muslims, and if they did not protest at that time, it was because they were scared of the LTTE.

The Tide Is Turning, Muslims Cannot Live Cocooned

By Mass L. Usuf –November 5, 2015
Mass L. Usuf
Mass L. Usuf
The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.” Martin Luther King, Jr.
Colombo TelegraphWhenever the issue of IDPs was discussed by the Tamil politicians amongst themselves or with the government or with India or with NGOs etc. the resettlement of the displaced northern Muslims was never given the place it deserved. They continued to live with host families where several households crowded under a single roof, without adequate sanitation or water supply. Most lived in refugee camps. In this lot were women, children, the disabled, those chronically ill and many who were economically vulnerable. No one cared for them for the past disgraceful 25 years.
Muslim refugee AluthgamaIn this state of affairs, it is indeed heartening to read in the columns ofColombo Telegraph so much being written about Muslims in the aftermath of the UNHCR Resolution. I say it is heartening not because these writings referred to the plight of Muslims but marvelling at the scholarship, intellectualism and liberality in the pens through which these thoughts flowed. The indomitable spirit of justice and the conscience of feeling towards fellow humans were the manifestation of these civic minded citizens.
Nationally, this is a favourable sign that Sri Lanka is returning towards a free, liberal and civil society. Not that these were not there in the past. They were indeed there but at the beck and call of the establishment. The steady exodus of the daring journalists and the untimely death of the not so fortunate scribes bear grim testimony to the extent of the freedom prevalent at that time.
Turn of the tide
Those who contributed to the Colombo Telegraph were not politicians. They were folks who looked at the issue with equanimity and proffered their opinions sans prejudices – be it religious, racial or political. Their writings have now been the catalyst to create a ripple effect in arousing public opinion about the plight of the hitherto neglected Muslim IDPs.                                              Read More