Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, October 29, 2015

Sri Lanka breaches agreements and promises!- S. V. Kirubaharan

Sri Lanka breaches agreements and promises!- S. V. Kirubaharan

Lankanewsweb.netOct 29, 2015
The UN Human Rights Council – UN HRC resolution (A/HRC/30/L.29) was successfully passed on 1 October 2015, by so-called “consensus”! It is a victory neither for the government of Sri Lanka nor for the victims, mainly the Tamils. But it is surely a victory for countries which have interests in Sri Lanka - the US and India.

ILO Accused Of Supporting Govt’s Secret Labour Law Reforms


Colombo TelegraphOctober 29, 2015
The International Labour Organisation (ILO) facilitated move to reform selected labour laws without consulting worker stakeholder’s has come under fire from the Trade Unions.
In a letter sent to ILO Country Director for Sri Lanka and the Maldives Donglin Li, the Trade Union’s state that “we the undersigned unions have reliably learnt that the Colombo office of the ILO is facilitating the reform of selected labour laws and your office has offered the government of Sri Lanka the services of two retired judges of the Supreme Court in order to provide necessary expertise”.
DSCN2107Further on the matter the Unions say that that a meeting will be hosted by the ILO on 2nd November 2015 to present the proposed draft labour reforms to unions.
The Unions say that they have been informed by a responsible senior official of the department of labour that as part of this process, major changes to the Industrial Disputes Act have already been effected in draft form and several other Acts are currently being reviewed.
The Union collective states “We wish to categorically state that we do not intend to be mere respondents of draft reforms or reviews the ILO unilaterally develops with chosen stakeholders sans any input or hearing from worker stakeholders. We consider this as a blatant disregard of the significance of the role of worker stakeholders”.
“In the above circumstances we wish to know, at whose behest the ILO has undertaken this process of labour reforms and why worker stakeholders were kept out of this process and its terms of reference not made public”
The Unions say that if a tripartite stakeholder is of the view that the current laws dealing with employment require changes they should first be brought to the attention of the stakeholders
Also the Unions have questioned the reputation and track record of the ILO nominated retired members from the judiciary to oversee the process.
“It is regretting to note that there are serious issues with the impartiality and integrity of these experts. One of them is a collaborator of the disgraceful impeachment of Chief Justice 43 and a cohort of the former regime who was unceremoniously and physically chased out from a high profile legal education institution headed by the country’s chief justice, after the fall of the former regime. This ex judicial officer was also a member of the bench that restricted the exercise of the right to strike in 2006” the letter adds.
The full letter sent by the Unions to the ILO chief is published below;
12th October 2015
Mr.Donglin Li
ILO Country Director for Sri Lanka and the Maldives
Bauddhaloka Mawatha
Colombo 7.
Dear Sir,
ABSENCE OF IMPARTIALITY AND INTEGRITY IN THE ILO FACILITATED LABOUR REFORM PROCESS
                                                                                    Read More 

Sri Lanka: Mob stops Christian burial 

sri-lanka
Worthy NewsBy Joseph DeCaro-Wednesday, October 28, 2015
(Worthy News) - A bereaved Christian family in Sri Lanka was prevented from burying their loved one after an angry mob prevented them from holding the funeral in a nearby cemetery.
According to Barnabas Aid, a mob of locals stopped the funeral procession as it entered the village cemetery in Santhively, thereby preventing the pastor from officiating over a Christian burial. The pastor then tried to proceed with the ceremony on the church grounds, but the mob again intervened. After police arrived, the mob dispersed, but fearing continued unrest, the police got a court order to bury the deceased in a cemetery more than 14 miles from the village.
In matters of both life and death, the Sri Lankan constitution has always awarded Buddhism "the foremost place," often resulting in the harassment and intimidation of Christians.

Advantage US, as China fades in Sri Lanka's war crimes debate

With Sri Lanka eager to get back in the good graces of the West, Beijing is losing its old leverage in the strategic Indian Ocean country

US Secretary of State John Kerry (left) meets with Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in Colombo in May.Photo: Xinhua
US Secretary of State John Kerry (left) meets with Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in Colombo in May.Photo: Xinhua
Debasish Roy Chowdhury in Colombo-Thursday, 29 October, 2015
Far from the South China Sea's unfolding turbulence, the calmer waters of the Indian Ocean are witnessing a more subtle geopolitical power play, in which China is losing its leverage over Sri Lanka to the United States.
The shift comes amid a raging domestic debate in the strategically located island nation over the investigation of atrocities committed during the country's civil war, which ended in 2009.
A recent UN resolution called for a credible justice system to deal with crimes committed during the war.
A UN report preceding the resolution detailed "egregious violations" by both sides, including rape and torture of detainees, extrajudicial killings, recruitment of children in war and indiscriminate shelling of civilians. About 40,000 people are estimated to have been killed in the final months of the 26-year war.
Former president Mahinda Rajapaksa had wooed China - and relied on Beijing's support in the UN to hold off any international probe into possible war crimes during the last phase of the conflict between the government and Tamil rebels.
But the new government that came to power after Rajapaksa's ousting in January has implicitly accepted a degree of foreign participation in the justice process.
"The latest UN resolution has given the US and the West considerable leverage over the Sri Lankan government, which earlier counted on China, as well as Russia, in the Security Council to pre-empt US intervention," said Dayan Jayatilleka, Sri Lanka's former permanent representative to the UN.
"The US now has the asset of an elected government in Sri Lanka which has conspicuously distanced itself both from Beijing and its roots in the non-aligned movement, while equally conspicuously embracing the West. It is a political, diplomatic, strategic and propaganda victory."
America's insistence on an international probe came as Colombo's tilt to Beijing became increasingly pronounced, with China financing the South Asian country's post-war reconstruction with billions of dollars in infrastructure loans as well as buffering it from Western pressure in global forums.
That relationship began to change when a unity government replaced Rajapaksa.
"The new administration is eager to get back in the good graces of the US and other Western countries," said Nilanthi Samaranayake of US-based research organisation CNA Corp. "After years of Sri Lanka being on the outs with them, it wants to resurrect the positive ties of the past."
Last year, the US had pushed for the publication of the UN report by March 2015. But no sooner had Rajapaksa gone than Washington prevailed on the UN to hold off on publication for another six months, to give the new administration some room to manoeuvre.
While the Hindu Tamil minority prefers an international probe, the Buddhist Sinhalese majority sees it as a breach of sovereignty, making any suggestion of an international role in the war crimes probe a hot-button political issue.
In more efforts to woo Sri Lanka, US Secretary of State John Kerry visited the country in May. Then, within a week of August's parliamentary elections reinstating the unity government, US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Nisha Biswal flew to Colombo, and, in a surprising U-turn, announced Washington would support a domestic investigation.
Finally, the UN in late September adopted a watered-down US-sponsored resolution for a domestic probe. Dropping its earlier insistence on a "hybrid" war crimes investigation involving foreign judges and prosecutors, the resolution mentioned foreign participation but did not make it mandatory.
"From demanding an intrusive external probe to settling for an internal one with an undefined international role, America's climbdown has been significant," said political analyst Kusal Perera. "The question is, why is it doing it and what is it extracting in return?"
Despite the wording of the resolution, as a co-sponsor of the resolution, Sri Lanka is expected to accommodate some degree of foreign expertise to make the process credible. But with most political parties opposed to this, finding a mechanism acceptable at home and abroad could take time.
But time is not on the government's side. An oral review of the probe process is due at the UN next June and a report will follow in March 2017, keeping the government on its toes - and giving the West even greater pull.
Jayatilleka, however, believes the Western leverage is temporary. "China has certainly suffered a defeat at the hands of the West, or more correctly, the Indo-US axis, but that could prove short-lived for two reasons," he said.
"The first is economic reality and the second is that much of the Sri Lankan public as well as one of the island's two biggest political formations in the unity government, [President Maithripala Sirisena's] Sri Lanka Freedom Party, sees China as Sri Lanka's most trustworthy friend."

Don’t arm MPs!

   B,C------MR------------------------------------------------------------------------------MS-------------------A,C

Editorial-


Some people have all the luck. They are our parliamentarians. They live off the fat of the land at the expense of the taxpaying public though most of them lack even basic educational qualifications to be employed in the public sector as sanitary workers. Monday’s article on this page revealed that, in an Indian state, 255 PhD holders had been vying with 2.3 mn job seekers including 152,000 graduates for securing state employment as peons. But, those who have even failed GCE O/L go places as ministers in this country!

Besides their salaries, pensions, duty free vehicles and other perks, parliamentarians are given personal weapons. About 30 first-time MPs in the present Parliament have asked for pistols, of all things, as we reported yesterday. Others already have personal weapons. MPs have been provided with small firearms all these years and the tradition continues even under the ‘yahapalana’ government.

Instead of asking for personal weapons, the lawmakers ought to take the lead in ridding the country of criminal elements harming hapless citizens so that everybody will be safe. If the vulnerable sections of society can live without weapons in spite of the rising crime rate why can’t their representatives?

More than six years have elapsed since the conclusion of the war. High security zones are being dismantled and checkpoints in the former conflict zone done away with. The government tells us that security threats are a thing of the past and those who successfully neutralised terrorism should stop harping on their military achievements. But, politicians still have large security contingents at their disposal. Armed escorts providing VIP security continue to wreak havoc on public roads much to the consternation of other road users.

Some Marxists who opposed the country’s war on terror, calling for negotiations with Prabhakaran, had no qualms about obtaining firearms from the capitalist JRJ/Premadasa governments and going on a killing spree against the JVP in the late 1980s. And, worse, most of those weapons were never returned. Successive governments haven’t cared to recover the thousands of lethal firearms issued to political parties.

Records pertaining to the arms distribution during the JVP’s reign of terror must be available with the defence authorities. A high level probe has been launched into a floating armoury belonging to a private security firm. It behoves the government to make a similar effort as regards the missing weapons. It should appoint a probe committee and do everything in its power to ensure that each and every firearm so issued is returned. It is believed that most of those weapons have found their way into the underworld.

Only the police, the security forces, members of the Civil Defence Force and other authorised personnel engaged in security related fields should be allowed to carry arms. The issuance of firearms to MPs or other people’s representatives can’t be justified on any grounds. Parliamentarians have armed policemen providing security to them round the clock and it defies comprehension why they should be armed. If they want to have personal weapons they should be stripped of police protection and asked to look after their own security.

What the Indian Supreme Court told the politicians in that country in 2008 comes to mind. The apex court known for being fiercely independent minced no words when it said that if politicians thought they were so threatened as to be protected by huge security contingents they had better stay at home, without being a nuisance to the public. The practice of MPs being given firearms must be discontinued urgently.

A monkey with a straight razor is, in our book, less dangerous than a politician with a lethal weapon.

Sri Lanka: Ex-IGP accused of destroying evidence in a high profile murder case

lasantha_wick_file

( October 29, 2015, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The CID has decided to obtain a statement from a former IGP in connection with the killing of ‘The Sunday Leader’ editor Lasantha Wickramatunga, say police headquarters sources.

The ex-police chief stands accused of destroying evidence in this case, including a notebook found from the murder scene and removal of reference to same from the Mt. Lavinia police crime OIC’s remarks.
Also, he has allegedly influenced the release of a military intelligence man arrested over the supplying of mobile phones to the members of the military accused in the murder.

The intelligence man made a confession before the Mt. Lavinia magistrate and was freed later.
A man, identified as Jesudasan, who had provided national identity cards to obtain these mobile phones, died in prison.

Government spokesman Rajitha Senaratne said at a recent media briefing that details of who had ordered Wickramatunga’s elimination and how it had been carried out were now known.

There is truth to allegations by former minister Mervyn Silva that ex-defence secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa is linked to the killing, said Senaratne.

The editor/journalist was gunned down on 08 January 2009.

Field Marshal SF refutes MR’s bunker story : never a security council meeting in such a bunker (video)


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -29.Oct.2015, 1.00PM) During the period of the war, never was  a meeting of the security council held in an underground  bunker in the way Mahinda Rajapakse has revealed , and as army commander he had never seen such an underground bunker . Hence this bunker has been constructed on the sly , Field marshal Sarath Fonseka the then army commander  revealed to Lanka e news.
Field marshal Fonseka made the above comments when Lanka e news inquired from him with reference to the recent statement made by Mahinda Rajapakse  at Abhayarama that there is no such  underground palace , and it is just an underground bunker where  security council meetings were held at that time when LTTE was launching aerial attacks. While  the ex president was making desperate efforts  to refute allegations regarding the four storeyed super luxury palace within the presidential  house during his 9 year long  brutal and most corrupt reign , the former army commander and war hero Field marshal Sarath Fonseka dropped this bombshell blasting the lies uttered by  mendacious Mahinda Rajapakse into smithereens.
Fonseka speaking further said , it was requested by him in case there is a need to build a bunker for protection from attack, that task shall be entrusted to the army . Mahinda after rejecting his request , constructed this super luxurious underground palace on the sly together with the Navy Commander. Even Fonseka passing  that way was resented and disliked  by Mahinda Rajapakse , the field marshal pointed out.
Fonseka questioned why such a super luxurious palace is needed to escape from LTTE attacks? Just being under the concrete is sufficient , he added. Presumably , Mahinda Rajapakse built this because he was in fear that the fate that befell dictator Gadafi is in store for him  too- that is , to hide in case the people rise against him. Even in the 400 acre land of his younger sister at Deniyaya ,a similar mansion had been built. The Filed marshal  questioned from where did ex president ‘s  younger sister get so much money to buy that 400 acre land?
The more important question is the cost of construction of this underground palace .It has been shown that the cost of building the army headquarters at Pelawatte and that of this palace are same. It is stated ,that cost is US dollars 33 million ! Field Marshal Fonseka the former army commander who knew the inside out about these colossal waste of public  funds on profligate so called security projects , revealed.
The media reported on the Deniyaya underground palace referred to by Filed Marshal Fonseka as follows :
An underground palace has been constructed at Deniyaya on the lines of that at the presidential palace.That construction was begun on 12 th January 2009. The building materials (bricks, sand, cement etc.) that were used for the Hambantota port project were used for this construction as well. These materials were transported to Deniyaya Nathagala land by the tippers that belonged to the Maha Neguma project. 
That Nathagala land was purchased in the name of Mahinda Rajapakse’s younger sister’s name, and its  extent is 400 acres.While there already existed a concreted road, another was built.This was built exclusively to enter the underground palace at Deniyaya .Three journalists who visited that place on 2 nd October 2009, to do an inspection  were taken into custody on terrorism charges under the prevention of terrorism Act. By that time two storeys of this underground palace had been completed .
This four storeyed bunker was fully equipped with the latest communication equipments and telephones. On the lowest storey in the underground ,was  a super luxury kitchen and a passage under construction.In addition , a helicopter pad was being constructed for  this luxury replete mansion . However with the media exposing this in 2009, all construction were completed immediately except the helicopter pad.
The video tape of Field Marshal Fonseka exposing the lies uttered regarding the bunker  by Mahinda Rajapakse best known for his worst mendacious nature  can be viewed hereunder 
---------------------------
by     (2015-10-29 07:31:02)

Ex-IGP accused of destroying evidence in Lasantha murder case

Ex-IGP accused of destroying evidence in Lasantha murder case

Lankanewsweb.netOct 29, 2015
The CID has decided to obtain a statement from a former IGP in connection with the killing of ‘The Sunday Leader’ editor Lasantha Wickramatunga, say police headquarters sources.

The ex-police chief stands accused of destroying evidence in this case, including a notebook found from the murder scene and removal of reference to same from the Mt. Lavinia police crime OIC’s remarks.

Also, he has allegedly influenced the release of a military intelligence man arrested over the supplying of mobile phones to the members of the military accused in the murder.

The intelligence man made a confession before the Mt. Lavinia magistrate and was freed later.

A man, identified as Jesudasan, who had provided national identity cards to obtain these mobile phones, died in prison.

Government spokesman Rajitha Senaratne said at a recent media briefing that details of who had ordered Wickramatunga’s elimination and how it had been carried out were now known.

There is truth to allegations by former minister Mervyn Silva that ex-defence secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa is linked to the killing, said Senaratne.

The journalist was gunned down on 08 January 2009.
- SLM-

Army officers cashiered for ‘links with SF’ to get back their dues shortly

Several Navy officers including Weerasekera and Sinniah to receive relief 


article_image
By Shamindra Ferdinando-October 28, 2015

About a dozen army officers who had been sent on compulsory retirement  or compelled to retire early over their alleged clandestine involvement with Gen. Sarath Fonseka during 2009 and 2010 period would be reinstated and retired with promotions and enhanced entitlements, authoritative sources told The Island yesterday.

This would enable them to secure higher ranks, back wages and pension, sources said. The arrangement had been made possible by the then Gen. Sarath Fonseka’s intervention soon after the January 2015 presidential polls, sources said, adding that an assurance had been given to the President regarding the concerned officers impartiality.

Democratic Party leader Fonseka had arranged for a meeting between those who had been affected due to the previous government’s decision and President Maithripala Sirisena at the Presidential Secretariat.

The officers are Maj. Gen. J. J. P. S. T. Liyanage (Artillery), Maj. Gen. G.P.R. de Silva (Vijayaba Infantry Regiment), Maj. Gen. G.L.A.D. Amaratunga (Sinha Regiment), Maj. Gen. B.M.D. Alwis (Field Engineers) and Maj. Gen. A.A.D. Jayawardena (Artillery). Sources said that as the last four officers had been compelled to retire prematurely they had been denied promotions as Majors General; they retired as Brigadiers. In accordance with the proposed arrangement, all of them would be able elevated to Majors Gen.

Sources said that Majs. Gen. Liyanage and de Silva had been sent on compulsory retirement while others were forced to retire early.

Among the others forced to retire were Brigadiers T.F. Meedin (Signals), G.S. Padumadasa (Electrical and Mechanical Engineers), Asoka Padeniya (Service Corps), L. Abeywardena (Service Corps), P.J.A. Weerasinghe (Military Police) and H. A. N. Hapuarachchi (Engineers) and Lt. Colonel A.K. Suraweera (Sinha Regiment/Volunteer)

Asked whether any of the brigadiers were like to be promoted to the next rank, sources said its was likely. They stressed that there hadn’t been any formal inquiry into the conduct of officers and they were unceremoniously dismissed. Sources said that the officers had been notified after the government directed Army Headquarters to finalise the matter. They would be called by Army Chief Lt. Gen. Crishanthe de Silva within the next few days.

Sources said that over 30 officers would benefit from Fonseka’s intervention. Some of them had returned to the service, sources said, adding that those benefited from the Maithripala Sirisena-Wickremesinghe decision included several Navy officers. Among them were Rear Admiral Thusitha Weerasekera and Commodore T. J. L. Sinniah. Weerasekera quit the Navy alleging that he had been deprived of due promotion to the next rank. Sinniah commanded naval task forces assigned to hunt down some of the floating armouries of the LTTE during eelam war IV.

Another beneficiary is A. K. Boyagoda, the Commanding Officer of SLNS Sargarawardena destroyed in an LTTE suicide attack off Mannar in the early 90s. Boyagoda remained in LTTE custody for several years before the then UNP-led UNF government secured his release in a high profile exchange of prisoners.

Some sources said Sinniah might return to active service.

Sources identified other Navy officers benefited by the government move as P. L. N. Obeysinghe, S. Hanwella and T. M. J. Mendis. The navy faulted Mendis for the Southern Command’s failure to thwart a Sea Tiger attack on the Galle harbour at the onset of eelam war IV, a charge strongly denied by the officer.

Sources emphasised that the Navy officers though being categorised as politically victimised were never accused of being involved with Fonseka.

Nine students hospitalized - Police fire tear gas

Nine students hospitalized - Police fire tear gas
By Skandha Gunasekara-2015-10-30

Police are actively searching for persons involved in yesterday's protest opposite the University Grants Commission (UGC) by students of the Higher National Diploma for Accounting Collective (HNDAC), which ended in chaos when demonstrators clashed with police leaving nine hospitalized.  According to Police media spokesman ASP Ruwan Gunasekara 40 individuals were arrested, of whom 32 were male university students, six female students and two bhikkhus.
Nine protesters were hospitalized with injuries, one in critical condition with a head injury while a Police Constable (PC) of the Bambalapitiya Police Station also sustained injuries.

The protesters, who had marched from Fort to Ward Place with the objective of speaking to the Minister of Higher Education and the UGC, were barred by a large police force from approaching the UGC building.
The demonstrators, following several attempts to negotiate with the authorities, resorted to physical confrontation with the police after a police official threatened violence against the picketers. "If you stay here for another minute we will beat you up," he is alleged to have said.

Convener of the HNDAC, Dhammika Ruwan Kumara, told Ceylon Today that during discussions the authorities had promised an audience with Minister of Higher Education, Lakshman Kiriella but later on had informed the protesters that the minister would not be available and could instead talk with the Secretary to the Ministry.
"Initially they said we could speak with the Minister of Higher Education so that we can come to an agreement but then they said that he was unavailable for various reasons and said that a secretary would meet us. This was unacceptable. We have spoken with Ministry Secretaries on several occasions to no avail."

Kumara added that the protesters had at that point refused to disperse until a meeting with the minister was arranged .This resulted in the police responded with threats of beatings and violence.
"We said that we would not leave until the Minister met us. Then a policeman said that we would be beaten up by the authorities if we insisted on staying and they started firing water cannons at the demonstrators."
Although the students were able to storm and topple the barricades set up by the police, tear gas and baton charges forced the protesters to flee.

Both the media and the public witnessed instances of police brutality when students, both male and female, were caught and beaten by the officials.
The demands of the protesters were that authorities re-establish the Higher National Diploma for Accounting into a Degree programme, as well as increase the Mahapola Allowance to
Rs 5,000.

Scandalous State Of Sri Lanka’s University System Sans Collegiality


By Rajan Hoole –October 29, 2015
Dr. Rajan Hoole
Dr. Rajan Hoole
Colombo Telegraph
Collegiality is central to the culture of universities. It means that we are all equal as colleagues and it is our function and duty to voice opinions freely and demand corrective measures when we see something going wrong. Heads, Deans, Vice Chancellors and the UGC Chairman have administrative functions, but are otherwise equal to the most junior academic. Academics have a right to be heard and a right of reply within a reasonable time to the representations they make. Our problems begin when these officials start mistaking their office for a crown on their head. The system becomes authoritarian and repressive all the way down. The right to reply guaranteed by the Establishments Code has become a dead letter.
The end of collegiality means the end of checks on authority, leaving the system open to unlimited abuse. The UGC evades responsibility for well-documented abuses by politically appointed vice chancellors, whom it had recommended, by claiming that their hands are tied by university autonomy, which has already been killed by political fiat. In reality what such vice chancellors do is to use their power to control deans, heads, and control leave, promotions and appointments of heads, to isolate and harass all who question them, never daring to reason out why. That is the funeral of every vestige of academic virtue.
Even as people have become inured to symptoms of rot and the stench of systemic decay, Jaffna was shocked by a recent explosion in the University that lifted the veil on deep-seated abuse, revealing the shocking vulnerability of young women, staff and students, while administrators had treated signs of the malaise with the casualness of business as usual.
The Jaffna University Science Teachers’ Association (JUSTA) has been active in trying to curb abuses at their very fount – blatant favouritism and disregard for rules in academic recruitment. This is what over time corrupts and degrades a university. JUSTA’s reports, largely based on council minutes, have been widely circulated. In two instances candidates who led the merit list for the post of probationary lecturer wrote to the previous Council, which had many of the present deans and the present vice chancellor as chairman. None of these had the courtesy of a reply. The previous UGC Chairman promised an inquiry; the current Chairman promised last June to place our reports before the UGC Council, but nothing has been heard since.
After several attempts to take the matter up at the University Council, the reports were placed before a newly created Grievance Committee after unpromising hiccups about terms of reference calculated to exclude our complaints. In the face of the Vice Chancellor’s hostility and the scale of the problem which calls for considerable motivation, time and energy from an ad hoc committee, the issue seems foredoomed to a slow death in the Council. Those who read our reports cannot but feel that something is very rotten in the state of the University.
                                 Read More

Tamil Nadu's political island

Troubled island: Fishermen may echo their anger during polls

Political voices demanding retrieval of the troubled Katchatheevu island from Sri Lanka are bound to grow in the run up to the next Assembly polls. While Chief Minister and AIADMK leader J Jayalalithaa, who had moved the Supreme Court to annul the 1974 and 1976 Indo-Lanka pacts ceding the island, has yet again written to the Prime Minister to retrieve the island, other party leaders are likely to toe her line.
Can raising the Katchatheevu bogey actually fetch votes for parties from the coastal regions of Rameswaram, Pudukottai and Nagapattinam? The fishing community is unwilling to commit on this now but acknowledges that their anger over the failure to retrieve the islet could echo during the polls in different forms.
“BJP leaders, including External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj had promised to retrieve Katchatheevu, find a lasting solution to the problem and create a separate ministry for fisheries while addressing the ‘Kadal Thamarai’ conference ahead of the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, But after coming to power, they have totally ignored the fishing community,” charges N J Bose, a fishermen association leader.
What is Katchatheevu? 
It is an uninhabited off-shore island in the Palk Strait originally owned by the Ramnad Raja. The island is used by fishermen to dry their nets. During the British rule, it was administered jointly by India and Sri Lanka. But in the early 20th century, Sri Lanka claimed territorial ownership over the islet. In 1974, India ceded it to its southern neighbour. Two years later through another accord India gave up its fishing rights in the region.
As no solution was in sight and the Centre has not given any indication for retrieving Katchatheevu or to find a solution to the fishermen problems, the fishing community might boycott the assembly elections to register their protest, he cautions.
The inaction on the part of the Modi government at the Centre has certainly emboldened the Sri Lankan authorities if the frequent arrests and confiscation of boats was any indication, he feels. “We will express our protest in a fitting manner when it comes to our turn,” he adds.
With ‘Tamil pride’ being linked to the issue no politician is willing to be a passive player. “Parties can’t antagonise the fishing community as a whole. That explains why DMK president M Karunanidhi belatedly moved the Supreme Court on the issue. For that matter, TMC leader G.K. Vasan, while serving in the UPA Cabinet as Shipping Minister did not concur with the Centre that Sri Lanka had sovereign right over the island,” points out an observer.
However, another section of fishermen says that retrieving Katchatheevu may not end the problems of the fishing community but it could force Sri Lanka to come to the negotiation table for working out a solution.
“The Rameswaram fishermen might get an additional seven nautical miles in the Palk Bay if India got back the island but there is no guarantee that the Indian fishermen would confine themselves within the seven nautical miles for fishing,” contends U Arulanandham, president, Alliance for the Release of Innocent Fishermen (ARIF).
Nonetheless, A Irudhayaraj, who has been fishing in the Palk Strait for more than three decades, was of the view that the problem could be addressed to a great extent if India retrieved Katchatheevu. The fishermen who ventured 20 nautical miles inside Lankan waters could be asked to confine themselves in the seven or 10 nautical miles beyond Katchatheevu if India got back the island, he says.

Date with history

  • October 21, 1921: During talks between the then Governments of Madras and Ceylon in connection with the delimitation of Palk Strait and the Gulf of Mannar, a Ceylonese representative claims that Katchatheevu belongs to Ceylon. But the Raja of Ramnad’s representative insists that the islet was within his zamindari.
  • June 28, 1974: Then Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi formally exchanges an agreement with her Sri Lankan counterpart Srimavo Bandaranaike ceding Katchatheevu to Sri Lanka.
  • June 29, 1974: M Karunanidhi, then Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, writes to Prime Minister insisting that Sri Lanka did not at any time exercise any sovereign rights over Katchatheevu. Citing historical records, he says the islet belongs to the Raja of Ramanad since time immemorial.
  • August 15, 1991: In her Independence Day address, Chief Minister Jayalalithaa urges Centre to retrieve Katchatheevu and restore the fishing rights for Tamil fishermen.
  • October 31, 1991: Tamil Nadu Assembly adopts a resolution demanding retrieval of Katchatheevu.
  • 2001: Chief Minister Jayalalithaa meets then Prime Minister A. B. Vajpayee and urged India to obtain the island on lease-in-perpetuity for fishing.
  • 2008: Jayalalithaa, in her capacity as AIADMK general secretary, moves the Supreme Court to declare the Katchatheevu agreements of 1974 and 1976 as null and void.
  • June 8, 2011: Tamil Nadu Assembly adopts fresh resolution for impleading the Department of Revenue in the case filed by Jayalalithaa.
  • May 3, 2013: Yet another resolution demanding retrieval of Katchatheevu adopted by AIADMK Government.
  • May 10, 2013: DMK president M Karunanidhi files a separate petition in Supreme Court seeking to annul Indo-Sri Lankan accord on Katchatheevu.
  • July 2014: Central Government informs Supreme Court that islet is a sovereign property of Sri Lanka. The 1974 and 1976 agreements between India and Sri Lanka do not confer any fishing rights on fishermen from India.
  • January 2015: Central Government seeks to distance itself from the dispute saying the Union Government was administratively concerned with the subject matter.
  • October 27, 2015:Chief Minister Jayalalithaa writes to Prime Minister Narendra Modi urging his intervention to get back Katchatheevu.
Parties and positions
AIADMK: The unconstitutional Indo-Sri Lankan Agreements of 1974 and 1976 should be nullified. Government of India should not treat the International Maritime Boundary Line (IMBL) with Sri Lanka as a settled question.
DMK: Katchatheevu agreement should be scrapped as it is against the constitutional mandate and not concurred by Parliament or the Government of India.
MDMK: The 1976 agreement is not binding on Indian fishermen. Retrieval of Katchatheevu is the only solution to guarantee livelihood of fishermen and ensure their safety.

Baton raised, the shocking moment a Sri Lankan cop brutally beats a mother in the street: New report reveals 'lawless' police use electric shock torture and rub chillies into suspects' faces to extract confessions


  • WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT-29 October 2015

  • Shock video of moment Sri Lankan officer beats mother, 36, in the street 
  • The woman, Weerasinghe Arachchilage Kanthilatha, who worked as a prostitute, refused to perform sex act on the officer

  • He vowed to 'teach her a lesson' and brutally beat her before witnesses, who secretly filmed attack 

  • Comes as new investigation reveals police torture is endemic in Sri Lanka

MailOnline - news, sport, celebrity, science and health storiesBaton raised, this is the shock moment a Sri Lankan police officer unleashes a savage beating on a mother in the street.

The unnamed officer had reportedly demanded Weerasinghe Arachchilage Kanthilatha, who worked as a prostitute, to perform a sex act on him, which she had refused.

Humiliated, the officer threatened to 'teach her a lesson' and thrashed her repeatedly with an iron cane in the street. 
Shocking: This is the moment a Sri Lankan police officer is filmed beating young mother Weerasinghe Arachchilage Kanthilatha with an iron cane in the street after she allegedly refused to perform sex act on herBrutal: The report spoke to victims of police brutality who had their faces rubbed in glass, had their wrists trussed up by ropes. Here, a Sri Lankan police officer beats a female protester during rally
Shocking: This is the moment a Sri Lankan police officer is filmed beating young mother Weerasinghe Arachchilage Kanthilatha with an iron cane in the street after she allegedly refused to perform sex act on he

Victim: Young mother Weerasinghe Arachchilage Kanthilatha, 36, is suing the Sri Lankan police after she was battered in the street by one of its officers
Victim: Young mother Weerasinghe Arachchilage Kanthilatha, 36, is suing the Sri Lankan police after she was battered in the street by one of its officersKanthilatha says she was forced into the sex trade through desperate poverty and was introduced to clients through a bad boyfriend a few years ago.

“We stayed in a small hotel for about two weeks. One day he went away leaving me there, and never came back. The hotel owner told me there was a big unpaid bill, and to recover the money, I would have to sell myself,” she told the Sri Lankan Sunday Times.

The video went viral in Sri Lanka and Kanthilatha is demanding five million rupees (£23,130) compensation. 

She filed a Fundamental Rights petition in the country's Supreme Court last October, complaining that she was assaulted with a thick cane and kicked by a policeman. 

The claim calls the Court to order the Inspector General of Police to sack all involved parties for torture, cruelty, inhuman and degrading treatment.

Kanthilatha's case emerges as a new Human Rights Watch investigation reveals Sri Lankan police routinely use torture as a short-cut to extracting confessions. 
Full Story>>>