Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Authorities Rescue 19 Kidnapped Migrants in Northeast Mexico

MEXICO CITY – Federal Police officers and National Migration Institute, or INM, agents rescued 19 migrants who were being held captive at three houses in Nuevo Laredo, a border city in northeastern Mexico, and arrested a suspect, officials said.
The operation was mounted in response to a tip from the public that led to the monitoring of activities at the houses in Nuevo Laredo, located across the Rio Grande from Laredo, Texas, the INM said in a statement.

Officers found the migrants, who were presumably kidnapped by a gang that was demanding the payment of ransom, in the houses, the INM said.

The migrants – nine Hondurans, seven Nicaraguans, two Salvadorans and a Sri Lankan – gave statements to investigators.

The gang tricked migrants by telling them it would take them to the Mexican-U.S. border, the INM said, adding that the criminal organization transported migrants from San Luis Potosi to Nuevo Laredo, which is in Tamaulipas state.

Once in Nuevo Laredo, however, the migrants were kept captive and the gang demanded relatives’ telephone numbers so arrangements could be made for the payment of ransom.

The suspect arrested in the operation was turned over to prosecutors, who will determine the charges to be filed against him.

The migrants were taken to the INM facility in Nuevo Laredo for processing.

The trek undertaken by migrants hoping to reach the United States is a dangerous one, with criminals and corrupt Mexican officials preying on them.

Gangs kidnap, rob and murder migrants, who are often targeted in extortion schemes, Mexican officials say.

'Everyone wants to leave': death of hope drives young Syrians to Europe

In a country where beheadings and barrel-bombs are part of everyday life, few see realistic prospects for change
 
Syrians walk amid the rubble of destroyed buildings following reported air strikes by regime forces in Douma. Photograph: Abd Doumany/AFP/Getty Images

 in Damascus-Tuesday 8 September 2015 

Suheil, a softly spoken 23-year-old, sees no hope for the future in Syria. The video engineer is scraping together around $2,500 (£1,600) to finance a perilous journey to seek a new life in Europe, fleeing what looks like a war without end.

Syria: The Hidden War on Women

Channel 4 News

TUESDAY 08 SEPTEMBER 2015

Syrian refugee women and girls are suffering harassment, sexual exploitation and domestic abuse in exile in Lebanon and Jordan, and that abuse is increasing.

British academic removed from blacklist after 4 days at Thai airport

Wyn Ellis spend four days at Suvarnabhumi Airport. Pic: Wyn Ellis.
Wyn Ellis spend four days at Suvarnabhumi Airport. Pic: Wyn Ellis.
By  Sep 08, 2015

Academic rivalries and accusations of plagiarism rarely make international news. But that’s what unfolded at a Bangkok airport on Thursday, when British academic and agricultural consultant Wyn Ellis, a resident in Thailand, was refused entry to the country because of a years-long plagiarism dispute that left him branded a “danger to Thai society”.

Ellis spent four days in the transit section of Bangkok’s Suvarnabhumi Airport after refusing to return to Europe, opting instead to stay in the airport until the matter was resolved.
He was finally allowed to re-enter Thailand Monday night:
Pleased to report that I am now out of custody and back in my in my home in Bangkok Yessss!! Pls send pics.
 
Ellis’s problems originate from a row with a Thai official which began nine years ago that led to him being added to a Thai immigration blacklist. In 2006 Ellis made complaints that the then head of Thailand’s National Innovation Agency (NIA) Supachai Lorlowhakarn had plagiarized much of his doctorate dissertation from early research that Ellis had conducted on asparagus.

After a series of legal battles, Supachai was stripped of his doctorate by Chulalongkorn University and was convicted of criminal forgery in 2012. He was also fired from his position as director the NIA.

The matter appeared to have been resolved, but on Thursday Ellis — who is married to a Thai academic — was told he could not enter Thailand after disembarking from a flight from Europe. Immigration officers showed him a letter sent from Supachai in 2009 that accused Ellis of forgery, stealing government documents, and being an overall “danger to Thai society.”

The Financial Times called the incident a “microcosm” of how the Thai elite are abusing the legal system by targeting opponents. That article also noted that Ellis’s detainment might may also be attributed, in part, to heightened security in the wake of last month’s bomb attack in Bangkok.

The half week of airport confinement proved frustrating for Ellis, who told the FT: “It seems everything we try to do, there’s an obstacle,” before calling the bureaucratic hurdles “Kafkaesque”.

He did, however, clarify in a Facebook post that he was not technically “detained”, as was widely reported in the media, but chose to stay in the airport.

“It was entirely my choice to stay to clear the situation locally. So, I want to make it clear I was never kept locked up by the Immigration Dept; this was my choice to remain so I could clear my name from the blacklist,” he wrote Monday night.

He added that he was allowed to work in an immigration official’s office and was provided with “excellent” food and “REAL coffee” by immigration staff.

When Ellis was eventually released Monday, he expressed relief and gratitude, tweeting:
OUT!!! So I am 'persona grata' again in THA. Thanks to Thai govt for removing me from the Immig Blacklist, and thanks also to all supporters
41 favorites
 
Ellis again praised immigration staff in a Facebook post after his release: “I must say the Immigration staff at the airport were professional, sympathetic and helpful. They really worked to take care of me and did their level best to seek solutions.“
 

Germany open to 500,000 refugees each year as crisis grows on continent

More than 332,000 people have reached Europe so far this year.
By Griff WitteMichael Birnbaum and Anthony Faiola-September 8 
BUDAPEST — The collision of exasperated migrants with overwhelmed authorities created chaotic scenes Tuesday at choke points up and down the route being traveled by tens of thousands of people seeking refuge in Western Europe.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel says Europe must implement a joint system for dealing with migrants and agree to quotas. (Reuters)

COCA-COLA PAID “SCIENTISTS” $5.5 MILLION FOR MISLEADING RESEARCH. GUESS HOW MUCH MONSANTO PAID…

Sep 5, 2015
Healthy Living - Healthy Food And Delicious RecipesThe New York Times recently published an in-depth article on one of its blogs exposing the Coca-Cola Company’s efforts to promote flawed science downplaying the importance of cutting calories — particularly empty calories — in order to lose weight. The company has been enlisting scientists to push the discredited idea that how much you eat doesn’t matter when it comes to losing weight as long as you exercise enough.
The efforts of Coca-Cola and other fast food companies to hide their role in the obesity epidemic have rightly been compared to the deceptive techniques used by tobacco companies to hide their role in causing cancer. The New York Times is engaging in responsible journalism by exposing this scam.
Will the paper turn its eye to the equally deceptive scientific techniques used to “prove” genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are safe for consumption?

Coke paid $5.5 million to faux-scientific nonprofit

The New York Times article highlights recent revelations that Coca-Cola has provided major financial and logistical backing to a new nonprofit organization called the Global Energy Balance Network. This organization publicly promotes the idea that people trying to lose weight should worry less about what they eat and simply focus on doing more exercise.
The article reveals that Coke paid $1.5 million to get the group started and has also paid nearly $4 million to fund the projects of two of its founding scientists. The organization’s website is registered to Coca-Cola headquarters. The company is listed as the site administrator.
The organization’s creation was announced in an editorial in the British Journal of Sports Medicine in March. Shortly thereafter, the same journal published another editorial blasting groups like the Global Energy Balance Network and their fast food funders, accusing them of using tactics reminiscent of tobacco companies to hide the effect of fast food on the obesity epidemic.
The position promoted by Coca-Cola is flat-out wrong, scientists note. In the abstract, the energy balance concept is correct. In reality, how much people eat — and what they eat — has a far greater effect than how much they exercise. Sugary drinks and other high-glycemic foods cause the body to gain weight and keep it on.
In addition, exercise burns far fewer calories than most people think. In order to burn off the calories contained in a single 12-ounce can of Coke, you would have to walk three miles.
“Coca-Cola’s sales are slipping, and there’s this huge political and public backlash against soda, with every major city trying to do something to curb consumption,” said public health lawyer Michele Simon. “This is a direct response to the ways that the company is losing. They’re desperate to stop the bleeding.”

Where’s the expose on GMO “science”?

Given that the New York Times approved the publication of a 2,367-word blog post about Coke’s junk science, can we hope to see an article of comparable length exposing the shady science of biotechnology companies soon?
Biotech companies regularly claim that rodent studies have shown their GMOs to be safe. However, a recent study inPLOS ONE conducted by researchers from the University of Caen in France revealed a fundamental problem with nearly all of these studies: they lacked a scientifically valid control group.
The French researchers conducted in-depth testing on 13 separate dried rodent chows of the type regularly used in GMO feed studies. The chows were produced on five separate continents. The researchers found that 11 of the 13 chows contained Roundup-resistant GMOs, nine contained Roundup itself, and all 13 contained levels of toxins high enough to cause health problems over the long term.
This means that any study in which the control group was fed one of these chows is scientifically meaningless; the harm caused by GMOs would have to be enormous to show up against the background noise of the toxic diets the control animals are being fed.
GMO safety data consists of a giant scam with potentially serious consequences. So how about that expose,New York Times?

Monday, September 7, 2015

HRC's sitting on Sri Lanka fixed on Sept 30


Return to frontpageA report on alleged human rights violations in Sri Lanka during the Eelam War is likely to be presented on September 30 during the 30th session of the United Human Rights Council.
As per the present time table, the subject on Sri Lanka will come up during the third and final week of the Council's session, which starts on September 14 and concludes on October 2. The sitting on Sri Lanka is expected to go on for three hours on September 30.
Prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL), the report is a sequel to the adoption of a resolution adopted by the UNHRC in March 2014, requesting the Commissioner to “undertake a comprehensive investigation into alleged serious violations and abuses of human rights and related crimes by both parties in Sri Lanka during the period covered by the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) [which is February 21, 2002 to May 19, 2009]." The period signifies two events - the commencement of a ceasefire agreement between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), and the conclusion of the Eelam War.
The 2014 resolution also called upon the Commissioner to "establish the facts and circumstances of such alleged violations and of the crimes perpetrated with a view to avoiding impunity and ensuring accountability, with assistance from relevant experts and special procedures mandate holders”.
A few weeks ago, United States Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Nisha Biswal, during her visit to Colombo, said her country would collaborate with Sri Lanka and others in drafting a resolution “that reflects the way forward.”
07 September 2015
The victory of the coalition of parties led by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe at the General Elections on August 17 will ensure that the changes brought about at the presidential election can be sustained. The majority of Sri Lankan voters reaffirmed the choice they had made in January when they voted in President Maithripala Sirisena and rejected the call of narrow ethnic-based nationalism. The National Peace Council welcomes the formation of the National Unity Government with the UNP and SLFP which have been traditional rivals, joining together in it to share governmental responsibilities including the allocation of ministries. Political bipartisanship was demonstrated in the unanimous vote of Parliament to appoint the Speaker Karu Jayasuriya.

We also welcome the decision of Parliament to give the TNA an important role in governance by appointing its leader R Sampanthan as the Leader of the Opposition and the Chief Opposition Whip’s position going to Anura Kumara Dissanayake of the JVP. As a party that primarily represents the interests of the Tamil people in the North and East of the country, the TNA has hitherto been focusing its attention on issues of particular relevance to the Tamil people. These include a political solution to the ethnic conflict as well as issues of post-war recovery and accountability. Now with the leadership of the opposition in Parliament being formally granted to it, the TNA is provided with an opportunity, and a duty, to conduct parliamentary affairs in the national interests. As the leader of the opposition, the TNA leader is vested with a larger mandate that includes the interests of the people of all communities.


Amongst the priority issues to be taken up by the new government, the establishment of public institutions that are independent of undue political interference needs to be taken up at the outset. The 19th Amendment to the Constitution passed during the period of the last parliament requires the establishment of a Constitutional Council that will oversee appointments to key institutions such as the judiciary, police, public service, human rights commission, bribery commission and elections commission. The passage of the 20th Amendment which is to establish a new electoral system, the passage of the Right to Information Act and the establishment of a domestic mechanism to heal the wounds of the past are other priority issues. The National Peace Council calls on all parties in the National Unity Government, including those parties outside of the government to ensure that the systems of good governance are put in place without delay.

The President, the Prime Minister, the Speaker and the Leader of the Opposition have an unprecedented opportunity to provide transformational leadership to the newly elected parliamentarians who will function for the next five years. Identifying needed changes, creating a vision to guide these changes through inspiration and executing change in tandem with committed parliamentarians will serve to enhance their motivation, morale and performance through a variety of mechanisms. The plural, multi-ethnic and multi-religious nature of the new government increases the prospect of a significant move forward in the direction of post-war national reconciliation. The setting up of a new ministry for National Dialogue under Minister Mano Ganesan who himself has led a civic human rights organization is an opportunity for the government to take peace building and problem solving messages through civil society organisations to the general population. As a civil society organization, the National Peace Council will seek to engage with the government to expand and widen the scope of national dialogue.
Governing Council
The National Peace Council is an independent and non partisan organization that works towards a negotiated political solution to the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. It has a vision of a peaceful and prosperous Sri Lanka in which the freedom, human rights and democratic rights of all the communities are respected. The policy of the National Peace Council is determined by its Governing Council of 20 members who are drawn from diverse walks of life and belong to all the main ethnic and religious communities in the country.

An Omnibus Cabinet & Outvoted Parliamentarians: Can The Economy Afford To Maintain This Colony Of Prodigals?


By Ameer Ali –September 7, 2015 
Dr. Ameer Ali
Dr. Ameer Ali
Colombo Telegraph
One of the horrendous legacies of the ousted MR regime was an economy burdened with oppressive debt, a culture of rampant corruption if not outright thievery, and gargantuan projects of colossal waste. The Mattala airport is the best example of such a project. Therefore it should be an obvious priority to the regime that just came in to take steps immediately to bring down the debt to manageable proportions, eradicate corruption and cut down the number of or cancel all wasteful projects. Prudence in public expenditure should be the first step that the government should adopt to move along that path.
The appointment of forty-eight ministers and thirty-seven deputy minsters, not because these minsters and their deputies are extremely talented and will contribute to the productivity and growth of the economy but just to reward party supporters and loyalists goes against the very grain of economic prudence. Is Sri Lanka such a huge and complex polity and economy that it demands the service of that many ministers and deputies with enormous salaries and perks? Can anyone tell the people the estimated total cost of this colony of artificially elevated political gentry? Will they fulfil their tax obligations? Who will check on their profligacy and punish for their incompetency and dereliction? Is there a mechanism to measure their performance and productivity?
In the past and long before the MR regime a much restricted number of ministers assisted by very able civil servants like for example, Dharmasiri Pieris and Bradman Weerakoon, only to name a couple, took the country and its administration from strength to strength even in the midst of political and economic crises. Is the country bereft of such civil servants now? If the answer is yes, then it conveys a sad tale about the recruitment procedure of the public servants. An amalgamation of small departments, appointment of able public servants and restriction of the number of ministries will prune down the cost of administration and waste.

Never were there links between Prageeth and LTTE intelligence -CID officer; Suspects told expose true culprit and save your skin


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News -07.Sep.2015, 4.10PM) In the abduction and murder of Lanka e news journalist Prageeth Ekneliyagoda by the group of army personnel led by Lieutenant Colonel Shammi Kumararatne on the orders of ex defense secretary Gotabaya Rajapakse, the story created that Ekneliyagoda had links with the LTTE intelligence division is an absolute lie, and there is no evidence at all to substantiate it , an officer of the CID conducting investigations told  Lanka e news. 
He went on to reveal , after the conclusion of the war ,all  the documents and registers of LTTE intelligence division leader Pottu Amman were scrutinised, but there was no indication anywhere that Prageeth and LTTE intelligence division had links.
The officer also bemoaned , the group that abducted Prageeth , and the team that helped them are via their media friends concocting fairy tales that Prageeth had connections with the LTTE intelligence division in order to mislead the investigations. But unfortunately for them the investigations are progressing duly despite their callous determination and attempts to divert  the investigations.
Information in regard to who abducted Prageeth and interrogated while detaining him at the Girithale camp ,and  who gave the orders? have been unearthed , and investigations are now on to determine the fate of  Prageeth’s body . After all the facts are ascertained , the culprits will be hauled up  before court , and legal action instituted , the CID officer disclosed.
Meanwhile , a defense ministry spokesman told Lanka e news that not only in relation to Prageeth’s abduction and murder , even in the other illegal abductions and murders , those army officers responsible are now whimpering that they acted because of  the instructions of Gotabaya.
The defense ministry has advised  these officers ,since Gotabaya’s group is not going to return to power , it is better  these officers come forward feralessly and reveal the truth regarding the individual who gave them the illegal orders to abduct and murder , so that they can by their confessions  get the maximum clemency  in court without getting into further trouble, the spokesman  revealed.

Niether the president nor the Prime minister is giving instructions to save any officer of the forces who was involved in these illegal activities ,the defense ministry spokesman added
---------------------------
by     (2015-09-07 10:45:36)
Now that the TNA is co-opted, why not Rajapaksa…

2015-09-07

The best way to keep bigots at bay is to co-opt the ex-President in the search for a political solution

A recurrent problem with the Sri Lankan politics is that it has continually failed to seize the opportunity even when it was knocking at the door. That failure  dates back to Independence; if the then political leaders had the courage to forge ahead with the Banda-Chelva  pact, or much later, Dudley-Chelva pact, we could have been saved from a ruinous civil war, that battered our economy and social fabric. On each occasion, it required decisive action and political will to make that difference, which we sadly lacked.



Ex-President Mahinda Rajapaksa, later succeeded in removing the greatest obstacle for a political settlement, an egregious terrorist group that turned Tamils into cannon fodders of a pipe-dream of a megalomaniac. But he too failed to translate those gains into sustainable peace. It is natural that he held reservations about Tamil politicians, however, for the sake of greater national interest, one could have expected him to try hard to co- opt the Tamil leadership to seek a political solution. It was his petty mindedness, just like many of his predecessors (plus electoral considerations), that deprived him and the country of that opportunity.


In this account, Rajapaksa’s successor is a pleasant contrast. Since his election, President Sirisena has seized the momentum that sprang up with his election victory and turned it in to the best shot Sri Lanka has at a lasting political solution. Hailing from the SLFP, a party that historically failed to grapple with the realities of the ethnic diversity in the country, President Sirisena is a stark contrast to many of his predecessors.
His feat in reining in the SLFP from demanding the post of the opposition leader, and, thereby paving way for the appointment of R. Sampanthan in that office is not only ethically and politically correct; It does also signify a major breakthrough in search for peace and reconciliation. Speaker Karu Jayasuriya found it easier to declare Mr. Sampanthan as the Opposition Leader, since the SLFP General Secretary in a letter to him abdicated any claims for the post. Obviously, the SLFP cannot keep the cake and eat it; it cannot be part of the National Government and to make claims to the post of the leader of the Opposition.  However, in the winner-takes-all Sri Lankan politics, such niceties are rarely practised. 
Also, in terms of their personal credentials, Mr. Sampanthan and Chief Opposition Whip Anura Kumara Dissanayake stand tall before the two presumed nominees promoted by the Rajapaksa coterie: Kumara Welgama and Mahindananda Aluthgamage (the latter is also being investigated by the Financial Crime Division).  

"His feat in reining in the SLFP from demanding the post of the opposition leader, and, thereby paving way for the appointment of R. Sampanthan in that office is not only ethically and politically correct;  It does also signify a major breakthrough in search for peace and reconciliation"


However, immediate and long term advantages and implications for reconciliation are more telling. Co-opting the Tamil mainstream politics would signify a major turnaround in the Sri Lankan politics; now, it would be much difficult for the fringe elements of the Tamil diaspora to complain about entrenched discrimination. Being the Opposition Leader, Mr. Sampanthan, and  his party  TNA, would have to speak up not only for the North, but also for the entire country. If he does that, he would be helping to change misperceptions still prevalent among a vast swathe of Sinhalese people in the South, and, effectively defeat the demagoguery of Wimal Weerawansa, Galabodaatte Gnanasara Thera et al. Added responsibilities at the national level would also have a moderating effect on the TNA, thereby helping the search for a political solution. Ideally, that would also weaken the pervasive influence of another defeatist agenda promoted by an unlikely source, former Justice C.V. Wigneswaran, the incumbent Chief Minister of the Northern Province. The Northern Provincial Council last week passed another resolution demanding an international war crime investigation.
In the past, Tamils were not short of their share of demagogues. Mr. Wigneshwaran threatens to become one.
However, what is not clear is that how far the average Sinhala folks, who are more susceptible to the demagoguery of their own demagogues in the South are aware of the merits of recent political manoeuverings. They live in their small world, listening to petty-minded politicians. But, their ignorance is dangerous. (The vast majority of them don’t read English newspapers, so they won’t read this.  But, had not our leaders dismantled a functioning English medium education in the 50s, we would have been a more enlightened society).



Mahinda Rajapaksa’s indoctrination of the Sinhala polity resulted in its further radicalization. Not only did he appease to fanatics, he also succeeded radicalizing millions of otherwise sane people, on whose back he expected to win a third term and build his familial empire. 
If MR could radicalize millions, the new government should be equally competent enough to de-radicalize them. A minority of bigots are a given in any society. But the radicalization of a majority in the majority community would turn a country into a zombie land. To see the danger of it, look no further than Pakistan.
In order to foster reconciliation, the new President has led by example. (He, of course, has a personal reason to do since, without the landslide mandate from minority communities, he wouldn’t have been the President) However, the Government can do better. While addressing long persisted grievances of the Tamil community, the Government should also act to ease concerns and allay suspicion  (many of which, nonetheless are overblown) among  the Sinhala community. 
To do that, the Government can take a pro-active reconciliation process from the grassroots in the villages, help communities empathize with each other and heal the old wounds. 
 It is only through reaching out to both the North and South, that the Government can defeat the sinister mechanization of the bigots in the South, who, when the time is opportune, would try to derail the search for a political solution. The Government can expose those bigots, many of whom are currently being investigated for corruption. It can also co-opt some of them. To that end it may have to suspend or abandon the ongoing investigations. The ex-President Rajapaksa has repeatedly asked his successor to stop investigations into him and his family.
Granting that request would surely infuriate re-energized civil society groups, who want to see the leaders of the former regime on the dock. 
However, if it helps the country to find a pluralistic political solution, no concession is too big. Even MR would like the proposition, rather than languishing as an MP from Kurunegala.
 

Follow Ranga Jayasuriya @Ranga Jayasuriya on Twitter

- See more at: http://www.dailymirror.lk/86177/now-that-the-tna-is-co-opted-why-not-rajapaksa#sthash.m9t2FrBz.3CUij349.dpuf

COMPROMISES TO STABILISE GOOD GOVERNANCE --JEHAN PERERA


Created on 07 September 2015

Following the initial relief amongst those who wanted to see the change of government that took place in January sustained, the aftermath of last month’s general election is not generating the euphoria that accompanied that of the presidential election earlier in the year.  The presidential election saw an immediate change of government, in terms of both personalities and policies.  President Mahinda Rajapaksa who had undermined systems of government to impose his will on the polity was removed from power.  There was a palpable lifting of the sense of threat from an oppressive government which was getting increasingly lawless and acting with impunity.  The new government team began to swiftly implement the 100 Day Action Plan that they had promised during the presidential election campaign. 
However, three weeks after the general election the new government has still to be finalized with nearly half of the ministerial slots still remaining to be filled. Almost all of the cabinet positions were filled last week, but all of the other ministerial positions remain undisclosed and unfilled.   In the background  of the delay in the appointment of ministers is the decision of President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe to form a national government through an alliance of the two largest political parties in Parliament.  The slim majority that Prime Minister Wickremesinghe’s alliance obtained made it politically pragmatic for the two main parties to work together in Parliament rather than separately. 
If the UNP and SLFP had not agreed to enter into an agreement to work together in a national government there would have been a danger of political instability due to the prospect of cross overs from one side of parliament to the other.  This danger was magnified due to the proven ability of former president Mahinda Rajapaksa to engineer defections in the past.  He first showed this ability after becoming president in 2005.  At the previous parliamentary election held in2004, the UPFA alliance won only 105 of the 225 seats, allowing it to form a minority government. Upon winning the presidential election in 2005, President Rajapaksa engineered defections from the opposition and increased the number of government MPs to 129, almost all of whom were rewarded with ministerial posts. 
BAD GOVERNANCE
The sharing out the ministerial positions to ensure that the government is stabilized is proving to be difficult.  This has also accounted for the swelling of the number of government ministries.   The large size of the cabinet and the number of other ministers who total over 90 in a parliament of 225 is being subjected to popular criticism.  The practice of swollen ministries began three decades ago, and is a means used by governments to attract opposition members to their own side and to prevent defections.   This practice is extremely unpopular with the general public who see the wastage of resources in the upkeep of so many ministers.  Both President Sirisena and Prime Minister Wickremesinghe campaigned on a platform of good governance, which included reducing the wastage of resources.  The 19th Amendment to the Constitution that they gave leadership to specifies that the cabinet of ministers should be less than 30. 
However, the 19th Amendment itself provides for a larger number of ministries in the event of the formation of a national government if this larger number is ratified by Parliament.  This procedure was followed by the new government, which obtained the sanction of Parliament for increasing the number of ministries to 48 with 45 deputy ministers.  It can be argued that the large size of the cabinet and the total number of ministers is part of the transitional process from bad governance to good governance.  It is born out of the political necessity to keep former president Rajapaksa and his allies from returning to power by employing the same means of providing their own set of incentives to parliamentarians to join them in forming a government.  A return of the former president and his ways of misgoverning the country would have been extremely injurious to the country. 
Although defeated in both the presidential election and at the general election where he led the opposition UPFA alliance in the election campaign, the former president cannot be ruled out of staging a comeback in his quest for power.    At the general election, he demonstrated his ability to stage a comeback by overcoming the opposition to his candidature from the chairman of the UPFA, President Sirisena himself, to take on the leadership of the UPFA campaign.   Even thought his ambition to capture power by winning the general elections was thwarted, there is no ruling out other attempts if the opportunity presents itself.  The former president continues to exert a powerful influence over the majority of UPFA parliamentarians to this date who thrived in an environment where checks and balances and the rule of law were in abeyance.
PREVENTING COMEBACK
The selection of the Leader of the Opposition in Parliament gave an indication of the challenge that President Sirisena faces within the UPFA.   Over a half of the UPFA parliamentarians proposed that Kumara Welgama, a staunch supporter of the former president, should be appointed as the Opposition Leader.   However, this request was disregarded by the leadership of the UPFA, whose chairman is President Sirisena.   The UPFA’s official position is that it is a part of the national government and hence cannot be simultaneously a part of the opposition.  But a sizeable number of the UPFA parliamentary group is not in favour of the formation of the national government and prefer to try and topple the UNP-led government and get back to power as soon as possible.   Most of them defied the party whip and abstained from the parliamentary vote that saw the elevation of TNA leader R Sampanthan to the post of Leader of the Opposition.
The appointment of candidates of the UPFA who were defeated at the general elections as national list MPs by President Sirisena has also come in for strong criticism.  The national list enabled political parties in parliament to nominate those of professional and moral standing in society to parliament in proportion to the number of votes won by each party.  The practice of appointing defeated candidates back to parliament on the national list is a vitiation of good governance.  But it is a practice by all parties, which have nominated one of more defeated candidates back to parliament.  In the case of the UPFA list, they are all loyalists of President Sirisena.  This was a bid to increase the strength of the president within the UPFA in the face of the continuing challenge posed to his leadership by the former president.  
Politics is said to be the art of the possible.  At the present time political compromises and accommodations are taking place with the intention of stabilizing the government which has pledged to engage in national reform, rebuild the faith that the people have in their government and to put in place structures of good governance.  One of the positive signs is the election of TNA leader R Sampanthan as the Leader of the Opposition and the JVP leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake as the Chief Opposition Whip.  Both of them represent political parties that have remained outside of the national government, yet they have been provided an important and independent role in governance to be a check and balance on the government.  The setting up of a new ministry for National Dialogue under Minister Mano Ganesan who himself has led a civic human rights organization is an opportunity for the government to take peace building and problem solving messages through civil society organisations to the general population.  The plural, multi-ethnic and multi-religious nature of the new government increases the prospect of a significant move forward in the direction of post-war national 

Misguided Priorities Of CBK


By Dinesh D. Dodamgoda –September 7, 2015
Dinesh Dodamgoda
Dinesh Dodamgoda
Colombo Telegraph
Former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga now as the head of the Office of National Unity and Reconciliation has declared her three main priorities. They are taking back land from the Sri Lankan army, investigating disappearances of Tamils, and resettling the displaced, the Indian Express reported.
There is no doubt that the task of resolving those issues that included in Ms. Kumaratunga’s priority list is important and good in terms of winning hearts and minds of the Tamils. However, the question is that whether this is the best way to initiate a sustainable reconciliation process in ethnically polarised and deeply wounded post-war Sri Lanka?
Statist Diplomacy
The approach proposed by Ms. Kumaratunga concerns with starting the process of reconciliation by resolving issues through direct government initiatives. This approach is clearly a traditional statist diplomatic approach that adopts frameworks and activities to reconciliation aiming at initially resolving issues through the ‘top’ level government initiatives.
Chandrika SampanthanHowever, as one of the subject experts and a practitioner, Professor John Paul Lederach, who adopts a practitioner’s approach to reconciliation emphasises, ‘the nature and characteristics of contemporary conflict suggest the need for a set of concepts and approaches that go beyond traditional statist diplomacy’. Accordingly, the most important task would be to adopt an approach to focus on restoration and rebuilding of relationships between divided groups, because reconciliation will endure if it is sustained by a society-wide network of relationships and mechanisms that reduces enmity which can regenerate destabilising tensions.
Weaknesses in the Approach                       Read More