Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Duminda Silva indicted on Bharatha Lakshman killing

 logoMarch 3, 2015
Attorney General today indicted UPFA Parliamentarian Duminda Silva and 12 others in connection with the killing of former MP and Presidential Advisor Bharatha Lakshman Premachandra.
Indictments were filed against them at the Colombo High Court on 18 charges including unlawful assembly, murder, conspiring to murder and abetting murder, Ada Derana reporter said.
Bharatha Lakshman Premachandra and four others was gunned down on October 08, 2011 in a shooting which took place in Kolonnawa, during the local government election. Silva was also wounded in the shooting. 
When the case was taken up at the Colombo Magistrate’s Court today, evidence was submitted in connection with the incident.  The court then decided that sufficient evidence has been received to file indictments at the High Court and therefore notified the Attorney General. 
Thereafter the Attorney General proceeded to indict 13 persons including Duminda Silva. 

TID arrests a Tamil woman and 8 year old French daughter

Background
Ms. JeyaGanesh Pakeerathy was a member of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) Sea Tigers unit for around four years (exact years unknown). She was heavily injured and was discontinued in 2000. After receiving intensive treatment at home, she recovered. However, even today she is unable to do heavy work.
In 2003, she married a man who was active in collecting funds and was involved in propaganda work for the LTTE in France. Her husband is a French Citizen. It was a customary marriage. They were officially registered in 2004. The marriage took place in Thailand. She left to France in 2005 on an ‘Immigrant Visa’ ( not sure if this is the official word for it). She was sponsored by her husband. However three years ago, her husband filed for divorce. The order of the Court was delivered on the 8th of January 2012. The Court had made an order for their divorce, for Pakeerathy to have the custody of her daughter and for her husband to pay the maintenance for her daughter. However according to the family, the order only comes in to effect in June 2015. Hence, legally she is still married to her husband.
Her daughter, JeyaGanesh Pakalvi who was born in 2006 as a result of this marriage. She is a French Citizen. She is currently attending school in France and came to Sri Lanka with her mother during her vacation. School starts again on the 3rd of March 2015 for her.
Arrival in Sri Lanka
On the 3rd of February 2015, JeyaGanesh Pakeerathy arrived in Sri Lanka. The purpose of her return was to see her parents. Her mother was suffering from cancer and had undergone surgery. The father too had a recent heart attack.
On the 12th of February, a two officers identifying themselves as TID had visited their house in Kilinochchi. One called himself ‘Vijithabandara’. Since Pakeerathy was not there, her father had asked both the Officers to come the next day. So the Officers had returned on the 13th of February, and recorded a statement from her about her connections with the LTTE and about her husband. She mentioned that she had a flight on the 2nd of March early morning. Thereafter they did not hear back from the TID Officers in Kilinochchi. Prior to this, two days after she arrived in Kilinochchi, two men identifying themselves as Criminal Investigation Department (CID) had visited their home for a general inquiry.
TID Custody
On the 1st of March 2015, at around 2.30pm, when Pakeerathy and her relatives were about to leave to the airport to catch the flight, TID Officers delivered a letter to her asking her to be present at the TID Office in Colombo the following day at 9.00am. When she mentioned that she had a flight early morning of 2nd March, and that she would stay on if they would buy her another ticket, no answer was forthcoming.
Hence she proceeded to the airport with a group of her relatives. At the airport, on 2nd March, the TID prevented her daughter and her from checking in, and from 2.30am in the morning to 8.30 am, she was in kept TID custody at the Airport. Her relatives (which included 2 small children) also stayed behind at the airport. However they were not allowed to see her. At 8.30am on the 2nd of March, both of them were released, and they were asked to go to the 2nd floor of the TID Office in Fort. Paheerathy and her daughter, and all her relatives drove back to the said TID Office. They reached there at around 10.15am.
There Paheerathy and her daughter was taken inside the building, while all her relatives were asked to stay out. At around 3.00pm, she and her daughter were taken by the TID to the Magistrate Court No 5 in Hulftsdorp. Paheerathay’s family contacted a lawyer and asked her to appear. Since the lawyer was not available at Hulftsdorp, the lawyer instructed the family to request the TID to hold on the matter for thirty minutes. The family had informed the TID that a lawyer has been arranged to appear and to wait for a while. However the TID had said, that they do not need a lawyer, and that they will take care of the matter and had taken her inside Court. The relatives stayed outside and hence do not know what transpired in Court. However when Paheerathy came out she informed them that the Court has ordered for her daughter and her to remain in TID custody.
The TID had informed the brother to bring some clothes for his sister. At 5.00 in the evening, a family member, together with the lawyer went inside the TID building. The lawyer requested to see Paheerathy, from an Officer who called himself ‘Bandara’. He refused permission and said that lawyers need to get permission in writing from the Director- TID. Though it was explained to him that it was legally not correct for them to have produced Paheerathy before Courts when the relatives have informed them that a lawyer was available, Bandara had said, that, they can even keep her without producing her to Courts.
When asked about why she was being detained, he said, that firstly she was in the Sea Tigers, and secondly she was trying to regroup the LTTE in France. He said the daughter was also in custody, as the Magistrate had ordered the daughter to stay with her. He also said, that Paheerathy had lied to the TID and had hidden the fact that she was flying early morning on the 3rd of March. He also mentioned that the family was supposed to come to the TID at 9.00am and they only arrived at 10.00am. The lawyer explained the actual position, however he continued to deny access.
The family was allowed to take clothes to Paheerathy. When the relative came out he said that Banadara had informed him, that the actual reason they are keeping Paheerathy is that they wanted to get her husband to come down, to which the relative had said that ‘even if you hang my sister he will not come back’. He had explained about her divorce.

Signs dropping the 500 million worth property given to Rakna Lanka

rk 1
rk 2




The proposed office planned to build for Rakna Lanka security pvt Limited with the patronage of the former defense minister Gotabaya Rajapaksa is currently believed to be abandoned.
The 86.4 perch property worth Rs. 500 million located at Thummulla which was given to Rakna Lanka was a controversial deal. On September 19th 2014 the property was transferred through a cabinet paper.
Nawaloka Piling has been given the contract to start the construction and following the presidential election the work has been suddenly halted. Therefore it is the responsibility of the god governance to investigate how a property of public interest would be given to a security company?

Removal of a Chief Justice from office


article_image
By Neville Ladduwahetty- 

The removal of former Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake from office has tarnished the image of Sri Lanka both internationally and nationally. Whether the measures initiated by the former government for the removal of CJ were driven by political motivations or whether opposition to it was also driven by political considerations is not of relevance. What is of relevance to the image of Sri Lanka is not the intent but whether the procedures as required by the Constitution and the Standing Orders of Parliament as they currently stand were complied with to the best extent possible.


A Tale of Two Chief Justices: From Process to Principles – Part II

Groundviews




By Luwie Ganeshathasan and Sanjayan Rajasingham. Read Part I here.
A Broader Analysis- 03/03/2015
The legality of Mr. Sirisena’s decision to reinstate Dr. Shirani Bandaranayake through executive order was questionable, though not strictly illegal.[i] This is largely because it stemmed from a unique situation. This involved the initial removal of Dr. Bandaranayake – tainted by doubtful legality and an unfair process – followed by an invalid appointment, and no obvious route to review that appointment.[ii] A simple “legal or not” based on the law proper[iii] would not do justice to these facts.

China’s challenges after regime change in Sri Lanka

Mangala_in_Chinaby Col. R. Hariharan
(This is the text updated on March 2, 2015 of the presentation made at a national seminar on “Understanding China – Indian perspective” organised jointly by the Chennai Centre for China Studies, and Institute for China Studies and the Nelson Mandela chair for Afro-Asian Studies, Mahatma Gandhi University at Kottyam on February 27 and 28, 2015.)
( March 3, 2015, Chennai, Sri Lanka Guardian) China’s ambition to further its interests in Sri Lanka has suffered a setback after people elected the common opposition candidate Maithripala Sirisena as President in preference to two-term President Mahinda Rajapaksa in the election held in January 2015.
China is probably familiar with President Sirisena as he had served as a senior minister and close aide of Rajapaksa during the last ten years. He was high in the hierarchy and served as the defence minister when President Rajapaksa was absent from the country during the Eelam War.

WATCH: In United Nations Speech, Noam Chomsky Blasts United States for Supporting Israel


Democracy Now!MONDAY, MARCH 2, 2015
As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in the United States to address the pro-Israeli lobby groupAIPAC and Congress, we feature Noam Chomsky’s United Nations address on the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People.

Chomsky is Institute Professor Emeritus at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he’s taught for more than half a century. He spoke in October to more than 800 people packed the hall of the U.N. General Assembly — ambassadors and the public alike from around the world. The event was hosted by the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People.

Click here to see Chomsky’s question and answer session that followed his address.

Noam Chomsky: Opposing Iran Nuclear Deal, Israel’s Goal Isn’t Survival — It’s Regional Dominance

ninewa-museumhatra-ruins 
The land of Prophet Noah and his Arc.
logoBy Latheef Farook
There has been systematic destruction of historic and cultural heritage in Northern Iraq, believed to be the land of Prophet Noah and the area where his Arc landed.

Iraq has spent months asking the United States for help to fight the Islamic State, but Washington is sitting on the sidelines during the battle for Saddam Hussein's hometown.

Baghdad to Pentagon: Surprise! We’ve Invaded Tikrit!

BY LARA JAKESKATE BRANNEN-MARCH 2, 2015
Iraqi security forces, backed by a combustible mix of Shiite militias, Sunni tribes, Kurdish Peshmerga fighters, and Iranian advisors, launched an operation early Monday morning, March 2, to retake Tikrit from the Islamic State.
The ground forces are reportedly being helped by artillery and airstrikes by Iraqi fighter jets.
On the sidelines for now? The U.S.-led coalition against the Islamic State, which the Defense Department says is providing no support to the Tikrit operation. After conducting more than 2,000 airstrikes against Islamic State targets in Iraq and Syria, the absence of the United States from the Tikrit fight is telling and speaks to how little influence the United States may have on this complicated battlefield.
That the Iraqis planned to retake Tikrit was well known, as thousands of troops and Shiite militia members had gathered in the nearby city of Samarra to prepare for the offensive. But a U.S. official described “a little bit of surprise” at the Pentagon and U.S. Central Command that the operation was launched Monday and said there is little question that it is being influenced by Iranian Revolutionary Guard commanders.
Qassem Suleimani, the once-secretive head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force, arrived on the front lines two days ago to advise Iraqi commanders, the Iranian Fars News Agency reported.
Suleimani’s leadership and the Shiite militias’ outsized role in taking back Saddam Hussein’s hometown, a Sunni stronghold, has some U.S. officials worried.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said that Iran clearly has a “big interest in the outcome of things in Iraq.” Speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations on Monday, he predicted Tehran will continue to exert influence over Shiite militias in Iraq to target the Islamic State.
But Clapper also acknowledged that Iran does not have total control over the Shiite militiamen, many of whom are nationalist Iraqis who “have long harbored resentment of the U.S. presence” in Baghdad and beyond.
“As long as the Iranians perceive that we are doing what comports with their objective — which is eliminate ISIL — as long as we’re on a sort of parallel course there, they’ll do what they can to control the militias,” Clapper said, using an acronym for the Islamic State extremist group.
The Iraqi fighters who launched the Tikrit offensive are a mix of government security forces and Sunni tribesmen, but the majority are from Shiite militias, according to a second U.S. official familiar with the broad outlines of the mission.
He called the mix “cause for concern” in a battle where sectarian tensions already run high. Tikrit and the rest of Salahaddin province are overwhelmingly Sunni, but the official said some Shiites recently have moved in from fierce fighting in neighboring Diyala province, which borders Iran.
That U.S. official did not know whether Baghdad made clear its plans for the offensive before it was launched, but said Iraqi leaders have for weeks discussed ways to take back Tikrit from the Islamic State. He said the combat was not expected to end quickly, noting that military operations that seek to prevent civilian casualties generally drag out for days, if not weeks.
It’s the third attempt to retake Tikrit from the Islamic State, which seized the town in June. Early reports Mondayindicatedthat some Islamic State fighters had been dislodged from their locations on the outskirts of town, but the advancing troops also suffered casualties from gunfire and roadside bombs.
“We were aware of the operation before it started,” Pentagon spokesman Col. Steve Warren told reporters at the Pentagon, but he would not provide any details about the level of coordination that may have taken place between the U.S. and the Iraqi governments.
The Iraqis did not request any air support from the United States, so it’s not providing any, he said.
“This is a sovereign nation, a sovereign government. Iraq gets to decide what it wants to coordinate on,” Warren said.
As for whether there are U.S. surveillance drones flying over the city, Warren said he would not comment on specific intelligence missions.
There are reportedly close to 30,000 fighters involved in the battle for Tikrit, with an estimated 15,000 from the Iraqi security forces. The United States has said it needs 20,000 to 25,000 fighters to retake Mosul, a northern Iraqi city that is four times larger than Tikrit.
The first U.S. official told Foreign Policy that it’s unclear how many fighters are involved and whether Shiite militias represent the majority. He noted that there are only an estimated 2,500 Iraqi security forces currently being trained by U.S. troops.
That casts some doubt on whether Baghdad could muster tens of thousands of forces to the Tikrit fight.
Washington’s back-row view of the Tikrit battle comes after a week ofdamage control by the United States to contain Baghdad’s anger after a Centcom official detailed sensitive plans for a possible springtime offensive on Mosul. Centcom initially predicted that the battle to retake Mosul from the Islamic State could start in April or May, which angered Iraqi officials who were sensitive to appearing not in control of the military campaign.
On Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry gave the strongest rebuttal of that timeline to date, telling ABC’s This Week, “That has been contradicted, and I think walked back. And there are a number of different options out there, so nobody should count on what they’ve read or what they’ve seen. This will happen when we are ready. It will happen on the coalition’s schedule. And it will happen when there is confidence that it will be successful.”
During that Feb. 19 background briefing with the Centcom official, a reporter asked about the role Iran is playing on the ground in Iraq.
“We don’t have exact numbers, but we know that there’s an Iranian presence in Iraq,” the official said. “But thus far, because we have a common goal, and there’s a common interest there.”
He added: “We have been working with the government of Iraq to make sure that they understand that there are certainly things out there that we cannot tolerate — i.e., the misuse of Shia militias and those types of things in an inappropriate way.”
Seán D. Naylor contributed to this report.

Russians stand in line to mourn by coffin of slain Nemtsov

A visitor holds flowers and a book ''Confessions of the Rebel'' by Russian leading opposition figure Boris Nemtsov while waiting to attend a memorial service before the funeral of Nemtsov in Moscow, March 3, 2015. REUTERS/Maxim ShemetovA visitor holds flowers and a book ''Confessions of the Rebel'' by Russian leading opposition figure Boris Nemtsov while waiting to attend a memorial service before the funeral of Nemtsov in Moscow, March 3, 2015.
ReutersBY ALEXANDER WINNING AND GABRIELA BACZYNSKA-Tue Mar 3, 2015
(Reuters) - Thousands of Russians, many carrying red carnations, on Tuesday filed past the coffin of Boris Nemtsov, the Kremlin critic whose killing last week, friends say, showed the hazards of speaking out against Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Aides to Putin deny any involvement in killing Nemtsov, who was shot in the back four times on Friday within sight of the Kremlin walls. Nemtsov's friends say he was the victim of an atmosphere of hatred whipped up against anyone who opposes the president.
"The shots were fired not only at Nemtsov but at all of us, at democracy in Russia," Gennady Gudkov, a prominent Kremlin opponent, said in a speech delivered next to the coffin.
"We never thought this could happen, but it did. Rest in peace my friend, your work will be continued."
Nemtsov, a former deputy prime minister, was the most prominent opposition figure to be killed in Russia during Putin's 15-year rule.
Most of those paying their respects were members or sympathisers of Russia's liberal opposition, who feel deep alarm at Nemtsov's shooting but represent only a minority of the Russian population. Polls show most Russians support Putin, despite a sharp slide in the rouble and international sanctions over the Ukraine crisis.
But at the ceremony there was a show of solidarity for Nemtsov from several prominent figures who served with him under former President Boris Yeltsin and who still have influence within the business and political elite.
None of them criticised the Kremlin but their presence - led by Yeltsin's widow Naina - showed that there are faultlines within the system of power built by Putin which could deepen if that system comes under more stress.
Two European dignitaries were unable to attend the ceremony because Russian officials would not let them into the country. Moscow said one of them, a former Latvian foreign minister, had for some time been subject to a travel ban for her "anti-Russian activities".
Absent also was Alexei Navalny, a prominent Kremlin critic serving a 15-day jail term for violating rules on demonstrations. He said a court rejected his request to let him out of jail for a few hours so he could attend.
For four hours, Nemtsov's coffin stood in the centre of a hall at a human rights centre named after Soviet dissident Andrei Sakharov. The casket lid was open, revealing Nemtsov's head and upper body. Photographs of the 55-year-old hung on the walls, and sombre music played.
Nemtsov's mother, dressed in black, stood stooped over the coffin. His former partner Yekaterina Odintsova, with a black headscarf pulled over her blonde hair, stood nearby. The Russian government sent two deputy prime ministers.
POWERFUL FRIENDS
The queue of people waiting to go in stretched about a kilometre (half a mile) in the streets outside the hall, and hundreds had to be turned away.
"He was our hope," said Tatyana, a pensioner queuing to pay her respects. "I feel like Putin killed me on the day he died. This last year has been full of suffering."
Nemtsov was later buried at the Troyekurovskoye cemetery, on the outskirts of Moscow. Anna Politkovskaya, an investigative journalist and Kremlin opponent shot dead in 2006, is buried at the same cemetery.
Though he became an ardent Putin critic, Nemtsov also maintained friendships with people from the Yeltsin era who remained loyal to the Kremlin under Putin.
Among those Yelstin-era allies paying their respects were German Gref, head of Sberbank, Russia's biggest bank by assets, Alexei Kudrin, a former finance minister still close to the Kremlin, Anatoly Chubais, head of a state-controlled technology firm, and Sergei Kiriyenko, a former prime minister who runs the state atomic power firm.
It has long been rumoured in Moscow that when Yeltsin stepped down in 1999 he extracted a promise from Putin that his circle would be protected. The killing of Nemtsov, whom Yeltsin at one point groomed as a successor, may be seen by some in the old Yeltsin milieu as a betrayal of a deal.
KREMLIN BACKDROP
The killing of such a prominent former official, against the backdrop of the Kremlin towers themselves in an area closely watched by the security services, sent a chilling message that no status confers immunity and no place in Russia is safe.
In an interview with Reuters in Washington, President Barack Obama said it was a sign of a worsening climate in Russia, where civil rights and media freedoms have been rolled back.
Among numerous official theories, some Russian government officials have said they suspect the murder was a "provocation" carried out by Putin's opponents to discredit him.
Russian investigators say they are actively working to track down Nemtsov's killers.
The killing may galvanise Russia's splintered liberal opposition, and deepen a sense among urban, middle-class professionals that their country is slipping into a cycle of fear and repression.
But it is unlikely to cause an upsurge of dissent across society. Nemtsov's fierce criticism of the Russian intervention in Ukraine was out of step with the broader public mood, and he was tainted by his time in government in the chaotic 1990s.
"I don't think he was killed for political motives," said Andrei, an employee at a motorcycle shop near the venue where Nemtsov's coffin was displayed. "He had a murky past and that's why he was killed."
(Writing by Christian Lowe; Editing by Peter Graff)

Afghanistan officials sanctioned murder, torture and rape, says report

Human Rights Watch accuses high-ranking officials of allowing extrajudicial killings and brutal practices to flourish after fall of Taliban

Colonel Abdul RazziqHamid Karzai accepts the Freedom award from the International Rescue Committee in New York, 2002. The president said he would make security his first priority after he came to power.
Hamid Karzai accepts the Freedom award from the International Rescue Committee in New York, 2002. The president said he would make security his first priority after he came to power.Photograph: Mark Lennihan/AP
 in Kabul-Tuesday 3 March 2015
Top Afghan officials have presided over murders, abduction, and other abuses with the tacit backing of their government and its western allies, Human Rights Watch says in a new report.
A grim account of deaths, robbery, rapes and extrajudicial killings, Today We Shall All Die, details a culture of impunity that the rights group says flourished after the fall of the Taliban, driven by the desire for immediate control of security at almost any price.

The chilling reason the Delhi bus gang-rapist blames his victim

Convicted rapist Mukesh Singh in India blames his victim for the rape. (AP)
By Terrence McCoy-March 3 at 5:52 AM
By now, the details of that horrible night are well known. A young woman, 23, had just completed a four-year study program and was about to begin an internship when she ventured out one December night to see a movie at a local Delhi cineplex with a male friend. Her family had high hopes for her. If anyone had the gumption and pluck to escape the three-bedroom basement apartment where she had been raised without running water — it was her.
Related:

Nepal official says human waste on Everest a major problem

Nepal Everest
Mar. 3, 2015
APKATHMANDU, Nepal (AP) — Human waste left by climbers on Mount Everest has become a problem that is causing pollution and threatening to spread disease on the world's highest peak, the chief of Nepal's mountaineering association said Tuesday.
The more than 700 climbers and guides who spend nearly two months on Everest's slopes each climbing season leave large amounts of feces and urine, and the issue has not been addressed, Ang Tshering told reporters. He said Nepal's government needs to get the climbers to dispose of the waste properly so the mountain remains pristine.
Hundreds of foreign climbers attempt to scale Everest during Nepal's mountaineering season, which began this week and runs through May. Last year's season was canceled after 16 local guides were killed in an avalanche in April.
Climbers spend weeks acclimatizing around the four camps set up between the base camp at 5,300 meters (17,380 feet) and the 8,850-meter-high (29,035-foot-high) summit. The camps have tents and some essential equipment and supplies, but do not have toilets.
"Climbers usually dig holes in the snow for their toilet use and leave the human waste there," Tshering said, adding that the waste has been "piling up" for years around the four camps.
At the base camp, where there are more porters, cooks and support staff during the climbing season, there are toilet tents with drums to store the waste. Once filled, the drums are carried to a lower area, where the waste is properly disposed.
Dawa Steven Sherpa, who has been leading Everest cleanup expeditions since 2008, said some climbers carry disposable travel toilet bags to use in the higher camps.
"It is a health hazard and the issue needs to be addressed," he said.
Nepal's government has not come up with a plan yet to tackle the issue of human waste. But starting this season, officials stationed at the base camp will strictly monitor garbage on the mountain, said Puspa Raj Katuwal, the head of the government's Mountaineering Department.
The government imposed new rules last year requiring each climber to bring down to the base camp 8 kilograms (18 pounds) of trash — the amount it estimates a climber discards along the route.
Climbing teams must leave a $4,000 deposit that they lose if they don't comply with the regulations, Katuwal said.
More than 4,000 climbers have scaled Mount Everest since 1953, when it was first conquered by New Zealand climber Edmund Hillary and his Sherpa guide, Tenzing Norgay. Hundreds of others have died in the attempt, while many have succeeded only with help from oxygen tanks, equipment porters and Sherpa guides.