Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Who Stolen Cash From Divi Neguma Bank Account?

( January 14, 2015, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) On 06th of January 2015, Rs.1, 456,980,000 withdrawn from the Divi Neguma bank account.
Auditor General requested to conduct further inquiries this regard.
A media statement released by the Chamara Mathumaluge, chief secretary of the Samurdhi Development Workers Union briefs on this cash withdrawal.
Divi Neguma project conducted under the direction of former Economic Development Basil Rajapaksa.
Couple of days ago Basil Rajapaksa and his spouse left to America.
Meanwhile; “Tamils or Muslims did not destroy my political career; it was only because of you all,” former president Mahinda Rajapaksa lashes out his brother Gotabaya Rajapaksa and his three sons.
My sons and brothers has completely vanished my 45 years of political carrier, the President expressed his anger with his relatives.

Release Tamil political prisoners, urges TNA

hindu-tamil-activists-under-arrest

By Mirudhula Thambiah-2015-01-13 
The release of Tamil political prisoners with a general pardon would pave the way for reconciliation, says Tamil National Alliance (TNA) Spokesman and Parliamentarian Suresh Premachandran.

"Tamil people have shown their goodwill by voting for the new government. They have cast their votes, placing trust in the new government, when the TNA campaigned in the North and East to vote for a change, without any precondition," he said.

He added that the new government has received an opportunity to express its goodwill to the people of the North and East.
"These political prisoners have been spending almost 10-15 years in the prisons without any proper cases filed against them or investigations conducted. There are a large number of young women and men, who have been political prisoners for many years. No proper action had been taken," he said.

Premachandran therefore urged the new government to take the necessary steps to release these prisoners on a general pardon.

"This will bring in a favourable beginning for the positive agreement between the TNA and new government.

"The new government should take action to release the political prisoners and resettle those who are remaining in welfare centres. The new President secured victory as the result of the votes cast by the minorities," he said.

He also said this will strengthen the relationship between Tamils and Sinhalese. Therefore, the new President and Prime Minister should take it into consideration and act accordingly.

Premachandran expressed his views in Jaffna on Sunday (11).
Former Sri Lankan ambassador to UN appointed as NPC governor

 13 January 2015
The Sri Lankan government appointed a new Governor for the predominantly Tamil Northern Province on Monday, replacing former military general, G.A Chandrasiri.

The newly appointed governor, H. M. G. S. Palihakkara, was a permanent representative to the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva  and Sri Lankan ambassador to the UN, during the final stages of the war against Tamil militants, where over 40,000 Tamil civilians were killed amidst Sri Lankan army operations against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).



The Northern Provincial governor, which is the only unelected position within the Northern Provincial Council (NPC), has the power to overrule any decision taken by the NPC.

MIA: Sri Lanka has 'same government with a different face' | Channel 4 News

Published on Jan 13, 2015
Channel 4 News

Follow The Leader Lyrics

Letter To The Tamil Diaspora: Dear Bala Thambi


Colombo Telegraph
By Romesh Hettiarachchi -January 14, 2015
Romesh Hettiarachchi
Romesh Hettiarachchi
Dear Bala Thambi:*
I hope this letter finds you well. I’ve heard the weather in London, England is pretty cold this time of year, though I can’t imagine it being as cold as Toronto (-22 deg. C. brrrr!).
I am writing to you in response to your various online reactions to the election of President Sirisena in Sri Lanka. I must admit a certain fascination following the various changes in your viewpoints since November, watching while you called for Sri Lankan Tamils to boycott the Sri Lankan elections and criticized other Diaspora Tamil groups who urged every Sri Lankan Tamil to vote in the elections. While I know that there are many Tamils who think differently than you (after all, few generalizations can be made regarding a group as varied and diverse as the Tamil Diaspora) I do want to address your perceptions that the election of President Sirisena has not changed anything.
Sri Lanka: an Island Divided?
Tamil DiasporaYou seem to be under the impression that Sri Lanka remains an island divided, pointing to the fact that President Sirisena’s victory was dependent on voters in the North and North East. Thambi, this is not really groundbreaking news: every vote matters in an election! President Sirisena was as dependent on voters in the North and North East as he was dependent on voters elsewhere in the country. As an astute observer of the Sri Lankan elections, you know that minority groups have in general voted against the incumbent, particularly in Sri Lanka’s recent history. Check the election map of the Sri Lankan presidential election in 2010. Moreover, as my friend Indi has demonstrated, maps of election results can be skewed to suit the purpose of the creator.
You harbor this belief based on your view that the Tamils voted en masse against President Rajapaksa and not for President Sirisena. Funnily enough, it’s the same view adopted by a certain former President. Look, mass generalizations simply cannot made about the voting intentions of groups of people. In this case, compare the votes of President Rajapaksa to the regional demographics: there simply are not enough Sinhalese in the North and North east to account for how many votes President Rajapaksa won in those regions. Clearly some Tamils voting for President proving the inaccuracy of your statement. Your generalized statement in legal terms is not supported by the evidence.Read More

ITN telecast Rs. 110 million worth ads of Mahinda free of charge!

itnThe ITN has telecast election propaganda advertisements of former president Mahinda Rajapaksa free of charge during the presidential election, it is now coming to light.
According to estimations, the total payment due for these ads exceeds Rs. 110 million. Ex-chairman Anura Siriwardena had approved the telecasting of these ads free of charge. In order to escape the allegations, he fled the country together with his family on the day after the election.
Similarly, the SLRC, SLBC and Lake House had carried ads of the ex-president without obtaining any payment, which totals more than Rs. 1,000 million, reports say.
Once new media minister Gayantha Karunatilake assumes duties tomorrow (15), he is to appoint a commission to investigate this matter and report back to him, after which the accused would be prosecuted by the attorney general.

Those Who Attempted Coup : MR, Gota, De Facto CJ Mohan, G.L. Peiris & Gammanpila



( January 14, 2015, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera is poised to make an official complaint with the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) over a plot by topped President Mahinda Rajapaksa to disregard the democratic election process and retain power through a coup in the early hours of January 9, the day election results not in favour of him were pouring in.
Samaraweera is scheduled to make the compliant with the CID at around 3pm this afternoon along with the president of the Lawyers’ Association Upul Jayasuriya.
Although it may not be possible to file charges against an Executive President, the compliant to the CID will be made against a candidate for the Presidency in this case Mahinda Rajapaksa.
Here is the full text of the complaint;

Weerawansa charged with fraud & corruption

Weerawansa charged with fraud & corruption
lankaturth

WEDNESDAY, 14 JANUARY 2015
A complaint has been filed at the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption against former Minister of Housing and Construction of Mahinda Rajapaksa government Wimal Weerawansa and his wife.
The complaint filed by Attorney at Law Namal Rajapaksa states Wimal Weerawansa and his wife led very ordinary lives when Mr. Weerawansa joined Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa’s government but during the last 6 years they have become millionaires and owners of luxury houses, lands and businesses.
The manner they possessed such wealth is suspicious states the complaint and requests the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption to carry out an investigation and to take legal action if they had been involved in frauds and corruption.

Mohan Peiris CJ kneels before Maithri and Ranil : begs to give any judgment in their favor provided they extend his term


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 13.Jan.2015, 2.23PM) The chief justice (CJ) Mohan Peiris (the cheat justice) who met the newly elected President Maithripala Sirisena and prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe within the the Medamulana premises has begged and pleaded with them that he would give any judicial decision in their favor if they would grant him time to continue as CJ until the 100 days proposed interim period of the newly elected government is completed.
This meeting took place at 9.00 yesterday night (12) .Maithri and Ranil had however told the CJ in no uncertain terms that the CJ they are looking for is not one who sides with them , but a CJ who would safeguard the independence of the judiciary duly, while pointing out that the appointment of Mohan Peiris and his subsequent official conduct had always been most reprehensible , and hence not only been resented but frowned upon by one and all. Therefore it is best he honorably tenders his resignation , before the people and the legal fraternity take to the streets against him which would be inevitable if he tries to cling on like a leech.
Thilak Marapone who was present at this meeting had also advised Peiris, in the circumstances the best course of action available is for him to resign at least safeguarding the little honor that is remaining in him. After these counseling the CJ had apparently left the venue as a sadder but wiser man but not wise enough to hand over his letter of resignation ,according to reports .
Incidentally ,it is this same cheat justice Mohan Peiris (CJ) , who crept into Medamulana on the 10 th to advise Mahinda Rajapakse that the latter can enter Parliament on the sly , to be the prime minister,Thereafter , become President after liquidating Maithri.
---------------------------
by     (2015-01-13 08:56:38)

A Victory Not Just by the Minorities

GroundviewsImages have been making the rounds on facebook, with various hues and shades, highlighting the fact that the sixth executive President of Sri Lanka, Maithripala Sirisena, won with the support of minority communities in Sri Lanka, whereas Mahinda Rajapakse, the last President obtained the votes of a majority of the majority. There is another image on facebook, that of a line drawing of a rabbit, requesting those who have time to go about colouring a map of Sri Lanka to induce racism, to colour the rabbit.
That is how much Sri Lankan society has been polarised over the last few weeks.
President Rajapakse was the clear front runner to win the elections in November 2014 when elections were called. The probability of him winning the elections kept thinning since then, when the General Secretary of his own party defected to the opposition to occupy the mantle that was the common opposition candidate. Come election eve, Mahinda Rajapaksa was still the favourite to win, albeit only just.
Never did I come across someone who whole heartedly committed to the fact that Mahinda would lose, even in the predominantly anti-regime circles that I move in. The most optimistic notion doing the rounds was that Maithripala had a very fair chance of winning, that optimism however was swiftly disqualified by that commonest of statements – should the unthinkable happen, the Rajapakses are so entrenched in their power politics, that they will never let go, and even if they did it would be after a bloodbath. Days before the elections, the prices of vegetables and other household commodities soared as a premonition soaked public stockpiled for the violence and curfew that was expected to eventuate.
The unthinkable happened, Rajapakse lost, he tried to use the military to create chaos, the army refused, and what ensued was probably the most peaceful elections and post election climate in my close to thirty year lifetime.
The Muslims and Tamils voted en masse for the opposition, particularly the Muslims. Not because they had faith in the opposition, but because the Rajapakses had to be deposed.
Under the Rajapakse’s, Sri Lanka descended from a precarious political balance to an utterly damaged one. Media freedom was stifled and Sri Lanka went from being a benign smiling island nation to a surveillance state, with state of the art technology mustered to wage the war now being used to protect the power balance of the regime. Journalists were killed in broad daylight; media institutions and other organs of a functioning democracy were stifled at best or bullied to submission. Ostentatious construction projects were instituted, some meaningful, some not so – but the incentive behind many such projects were the fruits of corruption enjoyed by those involved.
Political appointees were common place, and many at the highest echelons of power could trace some link to the Rajapakse family. Sri Lanka’s first female Chief Justice was impeached allegedly for blocking a project largely involving one of the Rajapakse brothers. The impeachment process itself was not moral and the very process reflected the tatters in which political decency lay, where it is rumoured that one of the loquacious ministers of the government addressed her derogatorily in Sinhala as ‘baby’.
As a nation many felt that we had lost our spirit under the Rajapakses. As a people, we were being groomed to dislike the other, in a land which abrasively and wrongly claimed to be that belonging to just one race. Racism was allowed to thrive; indeed bureaucratic apparatuses were struggling to survive without it. Ministers and ministerial offspring were running amok and thugs in robes went about desecrating the sanctity of the noble philosophy that is Buddhism.
Corruption was so rampant that it became such a deeply ingrained and embedded element of our psyche. Indeed when one lives in abnormality for long enough, that which was once considered abnormal slowly yet firmly goes through a subtle metamorphosis to become normal. Decadence becomes so gradual that it happens without grazing the sensitivities of our collective consciences, and eats away at our soul.
The Bodu Bala Sena (BBS), largely unrepresentative of the average Sri Lankan Buddhist wrought carnage upon the carefully evolved and preserved Sinhala-Muslim relationship. To the credit of the Muslims however, they have been astute to identify the BBS as a terror group and not of a representative wing of the majority Sinhala community. The BBS was out in the open, in its aggression towards Muslims, a country where law and order is considered sacrosanct would have no dilemma in having many of the BBS charged and punished. Instead, they were harnessed and even prospered under the watch of the last government. Among the reasons for their invincibility in the sight of many was their perceivably close relationship with the former defence secretary Gotabaya Rajapakse.
Hundreds of properties and close to dozens of mosques were damaged, causing immense physical and emotional trauma upon a beleaguered and innocent Muslim community. It was, and as of today, continues to be a symbol of the decadence of our society that hate speech so easily spewed from the electronic mouths of many educated Sinhala youth under the watch and connivance of the state.
However in all this, Muslims must not, should not and should never be tricked to indulge in turgidity that this was a victory brought forth by the Muslims and other non-Sinhala ethnic groups.
Rajapakse had to go, and the people rose against him, and that is all.
Muslims should move beyond the parochialism that has plagued politics in recent decades, it didn’t use to be this way; abnormality has once again come to be known as normal. It is understandable that circumstances pushed Muslim politicians down that path, but that time has now passed. Muslims should integrate- not necessarily with the Sinhalese or Tamils – but with all those who identify themselves as Sri Lankans, bar none.
I was amongst the tens, if not hundreds of thousands at the last rally by Maithripala Sirisena in Maradana of the Colombo Central electorate, and amongst the elated crowds at the Independence Square when the new President was sworn in. The former is a Muslim stronghold and the evergreen bastion of the opposition United National Party, the latter is a national treasure. Remarkable was the fact that in one instance, Sri Lankans rallied against the incumbent, and in another they rallied in support of the new incumbent, not as antagonistic warlords who had momentarily laid down their arms, but as a harmonious clutter of Sri Lankans of all shades, celebrating what they deserve.
Maithripala Sirisena’s Presidency, or indeed his new government should not be considered better than the last unless they actively prove to be so. They have made promising new steps, but they have miles to walk. This new government has to be held accountable for all the steps they take, commended for the good they do and taken to task for the wrongs they do. Indeed never again should a regime as dastardly and corrupt as the last be allowed to surface to soak the founding principles of Sri Lankan society, one that still teaches ‘values’ in her schools.
This is not a victory by the Muslims or Tamils neither did the Sinhalese win with the help of their other racial counterparts.
In the oldest democracy in Asia, her peoples got together to depose what they thought was a representation of everything that isn’t Sri Lankan, they did so to regain the Sri Lanka they know.
That is how it should be.
I am a Muslim, I voted for the winning candidate – it is against the grain of these sentiments to highlight that I voted in a Sinhalese, but I did and not just because there wasn’t a suitable Muslim candidate. Together I am from the political majority, a majority that should embrace the minority to form a cohesive Sri Lanka, not monotonous as a people, but one people nonetheless.

Minorities Taking The Revenge: Reading Sri Lanka Election Results 2015

Colombo Telegraph
By Sumanasiri Liyanage -January 14, 2015 
Sumanasiri Liyanage
Sumanasiri Liyanage
It is natural to interpret phenomena in the way the interpreter like it.Maithripala Sirisena’s victory at the presidential election held on January 8, 2015 has been subjected to multiple interpretations. Most pronounced one is that it was a victory for democracy. My friend Prof Jayadeva Uyangoda who has a better understanding of democracy, thinks the election result was a victory for good governance. Some have even interpreted it as a victory for women. Of course, in social science one may not definitely propose that these multiple interpretations are incorrect even though they are sometime contradictory. Let me briefly state my own reading of the election results.
Mahinda in Kantale, Jan. 2, 2015

In the early morning of May 19, 2009, the most revered and feared leader of the Sri Lankan Tamils, Velupillai Prabhakaran together with almost all his close associates were killed by the security forces of Sri Lanka marking the end of over 25 years of internal armed conflict that ravaged the island nation. In spite of Prabhakaran’s ruthless handling of the Tamil population, Tamils in the North and East of the island recognized him as an icon of the Tamils’s fight back against the Sinhala Buddhist dominated state in Sri Lanka. Hence a physical elimination of him was widely read by the Tamils in Sri Lanka and elsewhere as a serious blow against their pride and identity. Mahinda Rajapaksa won the election in 2005 with a thin majority primarily because of the boycott of the election imposed by the LTTE on Tamil people. The LTTE had to pay a heavy price for this decision in 2009. Hence, Tamils sought to take a revenge against Rajapaksa whenever they get a chance to do so. When the ex-Army Commander, Sarath Fonseka who conducted the war on the ground contested Mahinda Rajapaksa in 2010 Presidential Election, Tamils were hesitant to vote for him although Tamil National Alliance wanted them to do so. Voter turnout was just 25 per cent in Jaffna in 2010. So voters in the Sinhala South who gathered around Rajapaksa voted for him outweighing the protest votes of the Tamils. Waiting hurts, but Tamills in Sri Lanka patiently waited, not having faith in bullets but in ballots till the right time comes. President Rajapaksa, in the face of his dwindling popularity and placing enormous faith on his astrologers’ advice, called an early election with the hope that he could remain in power for another 6 years. Opposition was in disarray so that he predicted an easy victory. Machiavellian move by the ex-President,Chandrika Bandaranaike and the leader of the opposition Ranil Wickremesinghe completely changed the game plan as they brought in Rajapaksa’s Minister of Health and the General Secretary of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party as the common candidate to face the incumbent president. Maithripala Sirisena won the election held on January 8, 2014 by a majority of 449,072 votes. A back of the envelope calculation shows that Maithripala Sirisena was given a majority of 654,521 by the peoples of Northern and Eastern provinces that are predominantly Tamil and Muslim areas. This huge majority was in fact reduced substantially to 450,000 because of the majority given to Mahinda Rajapaksa by the Sinhala voters in the south. The irony of this is that Mahinda Rajapaksa actually got the majority of Sinhala votes in the south notwithstanding the fact that Sinhala voters were also disappointed of the regime for different reasons.

Dhanapala quits Cargills Board to take up Senior Presidential Advisor role

 January 14, 2015
Top diplomat Dr. Jayantha Dhanapala has resigned from the Cargills (Ceylon) Plc Board to take up the position of Senior Advisor on Foreign Relations to President Maithripala Sirisena with effect from 12 January. 
Cargills said the Board reluctantly accepted Dr. Dhanapala’s resignation and expressed its appreciation of his services as an Independent Non-executive Director and the loyalty and support extended to the company and his colleagues over the past six and half years. Cargills also wished him well.
Dhanapala is a former United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Disarmament Affairs (1998-2003) and a former Ambassador of Sri Lanka to the USA (1995-1997) and to the UN Office in Geneva (1984-1987). He was Director of the UN Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) from 1987-1992.
As a Sri Lankan diplomat, Dhanapala served in London, Beijing, Washington D.C., New Delhi and Geneva and represented Sri Lanka at many international conferences, chairing several of them.
He is currently the President of the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs; a member of the Governing Board of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) and several other advisory boards of international bodies.

Taking Stock: Presidential Election 2015




GroundviewsBy far the most important issue for the constituents of Sri Lanka at the last week’s presidential election was about opening a pathway for the formation of good governance. However, simply electing a new president does not create good governance. A president and his/her government should allow, nurture and strengthen good governance by gradually institutionalizing political processes and promoting universal values that are intrinsic to good governance. The new President, Maithripala Sirisena, and his revamped government have embarked on a journey with the proclaimed aim of establishing good governance, although some measures taken so far appear counter-productive and certain pronouncements seem rather utopian.
Taking Stock Presidential Election 2015 by Thavam Ratna
Why the Sri Lanka election upset is a blow to China



Kevin Sullivan-
January 13, 2015
For Mahinda Rajapaksa, the now former president of Sri Lanka, last week's stunning election defeat must be a bit of a head-scratcher. Having ended the country's decades-long civil war against the Tamil Tigers in 2009, Rajapaksa was long believed to be one of the most secure leaders in Southeast Asia. In addition to crushing the Tamil rebellion, Rajapaksa presided over a country with a growing GDP, a rejuvenated tourism industry, and a bevy of maritime and infrastructure projects in the works. So what happened?
Friday's election at least temporarily pauses the outgoing leader's grand vision for Sri Lanka; a vision that, according to many critics, had become increasingly authoritarian, corrupt, and unduly cozy with Chinese money and muscle. For Beijing, Rajapaksa's defeat jeopardizes its "New Silk Road" scheme, not to mention a number of road, rail, and port projects in Sri Lanka — the crown jewel of which being the proposed $1.4 billion Colombo Port City project
All of this is terribly inconvenient news for China, not to mention Rajapaksa, but it is great news for the liberal world order.
For years scholars and analysts have fretted over the threat China might pose to the decades-old international system, often referred to as the "Washington Consensus." Emphasizing free trade, fair elections, and deregulated markets, this system has more or less determined the rules of global trade and commerce since the end of World War II. In recent years, however, Chinese leaders have been travelling around the developing world offering a "no strings attached" alternative to the Western model. So long as contracts were met and manifests kept in order, Beijing would butt out and refrain from lectures on democracy, justice, and transparency.
Rajapaksa signed on the dotted line, offering Sri Lankans a Faustian bargain of prosperity and peace in exchange for obedience. Charges of iniquity, censorship, and nepotism were often shrugged off by the former president and his allies as little more than the grumblings of the marginalized urban elites. And China, keeping up its end of the bargain, has consistently rebuffed U.N. efforts to scrutinize and investigate alleged human rights violations committed during the Sri Lankan government's 2009 campaign against the Tamil Tigers.
But the perception of Sri Lanka as a vassal of Chinese whims didn't sit so well with ordinary Sri Lankans. Often referred to as Asia's oldest democracy, Sri Lanka has a long, complex history of colonialism. When Rajapaksa's former health minister and ally, Maithripala Sirisena, emerged as his likely opponent in this year's presidential race, a constellation of disgruntled parties aligned against the incumbent. 
Sirisena — a reportedly parochial and reluctant politician — tapped into popular discontent during the election, often chiding Rajapaksa for putting massive debt on the backs of ordinary Sri Lankans all in the name of growth and progress. Running a populist campaign with a rural focus, Sirisena often railed against ubiquitous Chinese-financed projects, and pledged on more than one occasion to scrap the Colombo Port City plan. In his campaign manifesto, Sirisena wrote: "The land that the White Man took over by means of military strength is now being obtained by foreigners by paying ransom to a handful of persons." Sirisena's anti-colonial rhetoric, coupled with his vow to diminish executive powers, resonated not only with the nation's Sinhalese majority, but also with the restive Tamil minority, who turned out in droves for the upstart candidate.
While last week's election may represent just a minor strategic hiccup for Beijing, the vote was unquestionably a blow to the so-called China Model — and it puts all would-be strongmen on notice: China may promise your regime "no strings" support, but it's your own people who will ultimately decide your fate, be it through the ballot or a bullet. Mahinda Rajapaksa — who reportedly asked that the Sri Lankan military intervene upon learning of his imminent election defeat — should consider himself lucky to have been defeated by the former.

View From India: Sri Lanka Assessment 2015

| by SATP
( January 14, 2015, New Delhi, Sri Lanka Guardian) In a dramatic turnaround of political fortunes in the island nation, Pallewatte Gamaralalage Maithripala Yapa Sirisena, leader of the New Democratic Front (NDF), emerged victorious in a keenly contested Presidential Election held on January 8, 2015. Sirisena secured 6,217,162 votes (51.28 per cent) against 5,768,090 votes (47.58 per cent) polled by Mahinda Rajapaksa, the incumbent President, and candidate of the United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA). A total of 19 candidates were in the fray, but the election was a direct contest between Sirisena and Rajapaksa from the outset, with the remaining 17 candidates eventually securing a joint total of 1.14 per cent votes. Sirisena took oath as the Seventh Elected Executive President of the country on January 9. It was the seventh presidential election.

I Don’t Think Sirisena Govt Will Investigate Journo Killings: Uvindu Tells IPI

Colombo Telegraph
January 14, 2015
“One minister, Rajitha Senaratne said that the government will investigate Lasantha’s murder in a press briefing. I have reservations about that. It is not only Lasantha’s murder; there have been dozens of killings. The former army commander who had command responsibility for those killings and attacks is a key figure in the new administration, so I don’t think they will investigate those.” says Uvindu Kurukulasuriya, founder and editor of the Colombo Telegraph.
Sirisena.FonsekaGiving an interview to the International Press Institute, the Colombo Telegraph editor said; “We need an independent state commission. We also need a competition commission to avoid monopolizing media in the future. And the government should transform state-owned broadcasters, newspapers and websites into public service media.”
When asked what is most important to understand about the current transition he said; “dictators have no place in this new media era, Sri Lanka has shown how to change a ruthless regime without any violence. The fact that there was no post-election violence sets a good example.”
We publish below the interview in full;

Rights advocates welcome promised changes in Sri Lanka

New president says news websites will be unblocked, press to be free
VIENNA, Jan 13, 2014 – Press freedom advocates this week cautiously greeted promises that press freedom in Sri Lanka will improve after former health minister and opposition coalition candidate Maithripala Sirisena unexpectedly unseated President Mahinda Rajapaksa in an election last Thursday, but some observers remained wary.                                                                     Read More