Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Sri Lanka election: Day of reckoning for a once untouchable president who could suffer an unexpected and humiliating defeat


Mahinda Rajapaksa called the poll two years early, confident of an easy win. But he faces losing power to his former ally, Maithripala Sirisena, who has tapped into discontent over cronyism and costly vanity projects

Mahinda Rajapaksa and his former minister, Maithripala Sirisena, who has generated huge support (AFP/Getty Images; Reuters)People formed long lines to vote in Colombo, where security was high, and turnout was good in Tamil-dominated areas where voting had been poor in previous elections







The Independent




Thursday 08 January 2015

Sri Lanka is braced for a major political upset, after a turnout of 75 per cent in the presidential election lent force to speculation that the strongman who ended the civil war, and whose family has towered over the nation in recent years, could suffer a humiliating defeat.

Election day: Sri Lanka at a crossroads

Opposition candidate Maithripala Sirisena (left) is up against incumbent Mahinda Rajapaksa in Sri Lanka's presidential elections.
Opposition candidate Maithripala Sirisena (left) is up against incumbent Mahinda Rajapaksa in Sri Lanka’s presidential elections.
Thu January 8, 2015
(CNN)In November, when Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa called an election two years earlier than necessary, the path ahead looked clear for an unprecedented third term in office.
Today, as the nation of 15 million eligible voters goes to the polls, the 69-year-old’s electoral ambitions appear in jeopardy.
After enabling an extension of his presidency by doing away with a two-term limit, Rajapaksa’s campaign was spectacularly wrong-footed by the surprise defection of dozens of political allies in recent months — including the man who now threatens to unseat him.
That man is Maithripala Sirisena, 63, and he was general-secretary of Rajapaksa’s Sri Lanka Freedom Party, and health minister in his cabinet, when he defected to lead a broad opposition alliance. Analysts describe him the most serious opponent Rajapaksa has faced.
The race — which watchdogs say has been marred by hundreds of incidents of political violence and a government misuse of state media — appears too close to call. Opinion polls and analysts spoken to by CNN are divided on the outcome.
"It’s not auguring very well for (Rajapaksa). He’s got a contest on his hands," said Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, executive director of Sri Lanka’s Center for Policy Alternatives.
He said Rajapaksa, accustomed to a weak and fragmented opposition, could not have anticipated facing a united alliance of nearly 40 parties — including 23 parliamentarians who have defected from the president’s own grouping, as well as nationalists from the Sinhalese majority and Tamil and Muslim minorities in the ethnically diverse nation.
"He didn’t expect the candidate to be Sirisena," said Saravanamuttu. "I think he probably underestimated the disaffection in the country and the desire for change."
'Rock star appeal'
Rajapaksa, a lawyer by trade, entered parliament in 1970, became prime minister in 2004 and was narrowly elected president a year later.
In 2010, he was returned to power with 58% of the vote.
I think (Rajapaksa) probably underestimated the disaffection in the country and the desire for change
Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, executive director, Center for Policy Alternatives
His crowning achievement in office has been crushing the Tamil Tigers and bringing an end to the bloody 25-year civil war that had raged between the state and the Tamil separatists.
The conduct of both the government and the Tamil Tigers was slammed by legal experts at the United Nations, who accused both sides in a 2011 report of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Yet the victory — delivering security and renewed prosperity to the war-ravaged nation, with an average of 7% economic growth a year during his presidency — remains his prime political asset, says Dayan Jayatilleke, a political scientist and former Sri Lankan diplomat.
"When voters turn on their TVs and they see the attack on Charlie Hebdo, on the Pakistan school, or Boko Haram, it reminds them of how hideous it is to live under terrorism," he said.
"That’s something the Sri Lanka voters have done for years, and whatever they think of the rest of his style of governance, they think he’s the guy who made it go away."
He says the folksy Rajapaksa, whose mustached face is a ubiquitous sight on posters throughout the island nation and is frequently likened to an ancient Sinhalese king, possesses “a rock star appeal.”
But despite this, dissatisfaction appears to be growing with his rule, which is increasingly seen by some as autocratic, corrupt and nepotistic, he says.
Too much power?
Following his 2010 reelection, an emboldened Rajapaksa amended the constitution to concentrate power in the presidential office and remove presidential term limits.
To many Sri Lankans, says Saravanamuttu, the move felt excessive. “They want the force of the executive president trimmed or abolished.”
There is also a widespread perception, says Jayatilleka, that Rajapaksa “has been ladling out a disproportionate share of resources to his family,” and is focused on building a political dynasty.
Three of Rajapaksa’s brothers occupy powerful positions: Basil is the Minister of Economic Development, Gotabaya is Defense Secretary and Chamal is the Speaker of Parliament.
Minorities alienated
The country’s significant minorities — Tamils, who comprise about 15% of the population, and Muslims, who account for 9% — have also largely thrown their lot in with the opposition, says Jayatilleke.
While Muslim voters had previously supported Rajapaksa over his vocal support for Palestinians, he had “totally alienated” them in recent times with his perceived tolerance of monk-led Buddhist extremist group Bodu Bala Sena(Buddhist Power Force), which supports Rajapaksa’s bid for re-election.
Last month, the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress defected to the opposition.
The Bodu Bala Sena has been blamed for instigating outbursts of anti-Muslim mob violence, including a deadly rampage in the town of Aluthgama in June.
Sirisena’s heartland appeal
Sirisena, who hails from the rice-producing North Central Province, also holds strong appeal as a candidate to Rajapaksa’s traditional rural base in the “Sinhalese heartland,” says Jayatilleka.
He’s a Sinhala Buddhist from a peasant background — you couldn’t get more mainstream than that in Sri Lankan politics
Dayan Jayatilleke, political scientist
"He’s a Sinhala Buddhist from a peasant background — you couldn’t get more mainstream than that in Sri Lankan politics," he said.
Jailed early in his career in 1971 during a communist insurrection, Sirisena rejoined mainstream politics through the Sri Lanka Freedom Party.
While he lacks strong persona; charisma, coming across as “a sober serious kind of man,” Sirisena presented a more appetizing alternative to voters than other potential opposition candidates, said Jayatilleke. The opposition also benefited from having run a stronger campaign than the government, he said.
So much so, Saravanamuttu says, that “conventional wisdom suggests that (Sirisena) may have an edge” at the polls.
For his part, Jayatilleka disagrees, comparing Rajapaksa’s prospects to those of Russian President Vladimir Putin during his most recent re-election.
"The international media expected Putin to lose because opinion in Moscow and St Petersburg was against him," he said.
"But in the provinces where most of the votes come from, they voted the other way, because Putin was seen as having crushed the Chechen terrorist threat and having restored the state of Russia in the world."
Jayatilleka’s pick? “Rajapaksa will probably lose all the cities. And the opposition, having won the campaign, will probably lose the election.”

Why people seek a change

GroundviewsToday, January 8, approximately 15 million Sri Lankans will seek to elect the island’s next president at a tightly-contested presidential election.
The chosen day is a special one. It is the birth anniversary of the founder of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), S.WR.D Bandaranaike and the sixth death anniversary of Lasantha Wickrematunga, the founder editor of The Sunday Leader.
Incumbent President Mahinda Rajapaksa now seeks a third term as the island’s president, having removed the two-term constitutional restriction imposed on an executive president, through a 2010 constitutional amendment.
Many consider Rajapaksa to be the forerunner in the presidential race, closely followed by the common presidential candidate Maithripala Sirisena, the former health minister of the Rajapaksa administration and former general secretary of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), the main constituent party of the ruling coalition.
The gap however, is said to be closing by the minute, making it a keenly-contested election.
Until Sirisena entered the fray and altered the electoral dynamics, a Rajapaksa victory was a foregone conclusion. There was lethargy among voters and a sense of déjà vu, about the possible outcome of the presidential election, held two years ahead of schedule.
For victory, President Rajapaksa heavily leans on the military victory over the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), achieved in May 2009, ending 27 years of war. His additional credentials include road and other infrastructure development, achieved during his nine-year rule.
In contrast, the common presidential candidate, Maithripala Sirisena has linked his campaign to issues of governance, including the need to address nepotism, corruption and financial mismanagement during the Rajapaksa rule. Unsurprisingly, Sirisena’s campaign appeared to gather momentum even at its final stages.
Following the announcement of Sirisena as the common presidential candidate, there was a series of defections from the ruling coalition to the opposition, in support of Sirisena’s candidature, taking Rajapaksa and his government by surprise. As one government minister privately commented: “It was a huge shock when Sirisena defected. The issues he raised, however, are only too familiar.”
Sirisena’s rainbow coalition finds within its folds, the main opposition party, United National Party (UNP), ultra nationalist Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU), Marxist Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) and others. Two ethnic-based political parties, the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) and the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) publicly expressed thier support to Sirisena last week.
The mass crossovers to the opposition have enraged the ruling administration, prompting President Rajapaksa to repeatedly declare from his political platform that he would never allow the dissidents to return. Outraged he may be by Sirisena’s decision to turn on his former leader and the politically party of which he was a a member since the tender age of 17, but it may be wiser for Rajapaksa to turn the search light inwards and analyze why his own flock has suddenly decided to desert his camp.
It is not as if Maithripala Sirisena, a simple villager who has risen within the SLFP ranks to reach top positions, holds the island enthralled. Instead, what he represents in terms of ideas and promises, matter to a large majority of the people who have silently observed an elected president turn increasingly authoritarian and triumphalist.
“Irrespective of the final electoral outcome, there are reasons for Sirisena’s electoral gains so far, some of which Rajapaksa may have to regret at leisure,” notes UNP parliamentarian, Harsha de Silva.
Indeed, there appear to be many reasons for regret within the Rajapaksa camp.
The incumbency has caused serious disappointment to the rank and file by the concentration of power within the UPFA itself. While publicly unexpressed, there are many within the government who feel that the Rajapaksas control both the administration and the economy in a manner that does not allow any role for others. Ministers have been reduced to mere rubber stamps whose role is to agree and approve decisions, in contrast to the powerful role played by ministers in the past. If anyone enjoyed political clout, there is no argument that such persons were either Rajapaksas themselves or those closely associated with them. Maihripala Sirisena is therefore, the embodiment of the disillusionment felt by many others within the administration who did not enjoy the privileged position of a few.
The victory over the Liberation Tigers has made Rajapaksa invincible, contributing to his own conviction that he is an uncrowned king and not to be questioned, and his actions, only to be applauded by his loyal subjects.
The administration has, in a calculated manner, also suppressed ethnic and religious minorities, contributing to their growing insecurity and the fear of the unknown.
If the war victory resulted in driving fear into the minds of the ethnic and religious minorities, there were no genuine attempts made to achieve reconciliation in a country that had experienced nearly three decades of war.
Instead, there was new room created for the growth of groups such as theBodu Bala Sena(BBS), a fringe extremist Sinhala outfit, going on the rampage, with their twin achievements being the shame it brought upon the government that directly or indirectly blessed its behaviour, and its efforts to portray the Sinhalese as extremists out to crush other identities. With the shifting of loyalties just days ahead of the election, the island’s two main minority political parties have sent a strong message to the incumbency.
In his post-war euphoria, Rajapaksa whose main constituency is in the south, has overlooked the political crisis he may have to face, in the event of a strong swing by ethnic minorities, which could create a serious dent in his popular base.
There would be many who feel that only Rajapaksa had the determination to bring the war to end, style and consequences notwithstanding. They may also concede that despite allegations of corruption and embezzlement, this administration has contributed to the development of the island’s infrastructure, specially rail and road connectivity.
Yet, there may be others who feel that while road and rail connectivity was being achieved, the incumbency has severed connectivity among the island’s communities that lived in harmony for decades, causing serious divisions on ethno-religious lines.
It is that negative difference that has fuelled an electorate’s call for a political change, perhaps at great risk, still with the hope that a new administration may have the political maturity to tolerate dissent and celebrate a plural Sri Lankan identity.

Sri Lanka rivals await presidential election results

Composite image of President Mahinda Rajapaksa (left) and Maithripala SirisenaThe two rivals were close allies before the current election
8 January 2015
BBCSri Lanka's presidential hopefuls are awaiting results from the most closely fought election in recent history.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa has dominated politics for a decade, but faced an unexpected challenge from his health minister Maithripala Sirisena.
Election officials said voter turnout was high and no complaints had been made, and observers said there were relatively few violent incidents.
Mr Rajapaksa is credited by many with ending the civil war in 2009.
Troops routed the Tamil Tigers after more than two decades of fighting.
But rights groups accused both sides in the war of atrocities, allegations the government denies.
Sri Lankan police officers escort an election official carrying ballot boxes to the counting centres after the voting at the seventh Presidential Election in Colombo, Sri Lanka, 08 JanuarySecurity was high around Sri Lanka, but there were relatively few violent incidents
Both Mr Rajapaksa and Mr Sirisena are Sinhalese, the majority ethnic group in Sri Lanka.
They were allies until November, when Mr Sirisena announced his surprise candidacy.
The former health minister is tipped to gather most of the votes from the minority groups, with whom Mr Rajapaksa is deeply unpopular.
But he will also need a substantial number of votes from the Sinhalese, who have generally backed the long-time president in huge numbers.
Election officials will count ballots through the night, with a definitive result expected at about midday (06:30 GMT).
Supporters of Sri Lanka"s main opposition presidential candidate Maithripala Sirisena burst firecrackers in front of his cutout at the end of voting in the presidential election in Colombo, Sri Lanka, Thursday, Jan. 8With the voting over, the parties began in Colombo
Supporters of Sri Lankan President and general election candidate Mahinda Rajapaksa celebrate following the close of polls in Colombo on January 8Supporters of both candidates believe they have won
High Tamil turnout
Turnout in many areas was above 70%, roughly in line with previous elections.
In Jaffna and Trincomalee, two of the main Tamil strongholds expected to vote against Mr Rajapaksa, turnout was higher than previous national elections.
The Colombo-based Centre for Monitoring Election Violence said voting had been brisk through the day, with only a few major incidents reported.
Election commissioner Mahinda Deshapriya also said there had been no incidents major enough to disrupt the electoral process.
The build-up to Sri Lankan elections is usually blighted by dozens of deaths, but this year just one election-related death was reported.
There are no reliable opinion polls in Sri Lanka, but correspondents say Mr Rajapaksa's unpopularity with minorities combined with the new challenge in his Sinhala heartland will leave him struggling to find enough votes to win.
Mr Rajapaksa was last elected in 2010 when he defeated his former army chief Sarath Fonseka, who was later jailed on charges of implicating the government in war crimes.

Polls Chief Forces Rupavahini To Apologise For Sajith P Crossover Stunt Propaganda

Colombo Telegraph
January 8, 2015
State media broadcaster Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation was forced to apologise after Elections Commissioner Mahinda Deshapriya stormed into the premises earlier today to demand a retraction of the story that Sajith Premadasa had crossed over to the Government.
Ranil And Sajith newEarlier today, soon after polling started Rupavahini aired a story alleging that Premadasa had been seen going into Temple Trees this morning.
An angry letter from Premadasa to the Commmissioner of Elections was to follow charging that the state media affiliated to the Rajapaksa Government was engaged in an attempt to mislead voters by undermining his support to the common candidate.
In this letter, Premadasa charged that the channel had caused serious damage to his political image and career by their false propaganda.
Deshapriya ordered the state media channel to broadcast the full letter of denial by Premadasa a few hours later.
Rupavahini also said it regretted any harm caused by its news story.
Print Friendly

IFJ Voncerned At Surge In Election-Related Violence In Sri Lanka

Eravur in the Battticaloa district
[Opposition election offcie after an attack by pro-Government gang]
Sri Lanka Brief08/01/2015  
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) expresses its concern over an escalation of violence ahead of the Sri Lankan presidential election today and reiterates its call to ensure media freedom and the safety of journalists during and after the election.
Today, Sri Lanka votes for a new president with the incumbent president, Mahinda Rajapaksha, seeking a third-term in the office after calling a snap election in November two years ahead of schedule. Maithripala Sirisena has been named as the main opposition contender and has the support of the main opposition party, as well as the major parties representing the country’s ethnic Tamil and Muslim minorities.
The IFJ has received reports of a surge of election-related violence in the build-up to the election; as well as reports of alleged misuse of state-owned media. Amid other reports that state media is openly calling people to vote for President Rajapaksa, the country’s election commissioner has issued warnings against several state media outlets to desist from broadcasting election “propaganda”.
An election violence monitoring report, by the Centre for Monitoring Election Violence (CMEV) stated that as of January 6, there were at least 237 “major incidents” and 183 “minor incidents’ during the campaigning period, including dozens of cases of assaults, intimidation or damage to property. Of those attacks, at least 22 included a firearm. The CMEV also said there was “unparalleled misuse of state resources and media” by the ruling party.
Reports suggest troops have been deployed to the northern Tamil-dominated Wanni region and former warzone ahead of today’s election today – a move that would contravene election laws in Sri Lanka. Police are responsible for monitoring voting centres.
With a history of violence and civil unrest in the country’s elections, including actions against the media, the IFJ is urging the government and the Department of Elections to deploy all possible measures to ensure media freedom and the safety of journalists.
The IFJ Asia-Pacific office said: “The world is watching Sri Lanka and we call on government to respect freedom of expression and the right of the media to present all voices which is so critical to the democratic process of the country.”
The IFJ said Sri Lankan authorities have a responsibility to ensure that all people in Sri Lanka are able to exercise their right to political participation and freedom of expression without intimidation, threats or violence.
Nearly 15 million people are eligible to vote on Thursday to elect a president for a six-year term. The poll is expected to be a close contest. 

Treat sniffer dogs like police officers 


article_image
January 8, 2015, 8:19 pm
A police dog is trained to assist police and other law-enforcement personnel in their work such as searching for drugs, chemicals, hormones, fire accelerants and explosives, lost people and dead bodies, looking for crime scene evidence and protecting their handlers. In America many prisons use dog teams to intervene in fights or riots and to find escaped prisoners. The most commonly used breeds in India are the German Shepherd and the Labrador. As of this year the Delhi Dog Squad will take local Indian dogs.

Dogs have been used for law enforcement since the Middle Ages. Money was set aside in the English villages for the upkeep of the local constables’ bloodhounds used for hunting down outlaws. Bloodhounds used in Scotland were known as "Slough dogs" - the word "Sleuth" is derived from this.

Dogs first started being used in Europe. Paris police used dogs against roaming criminal gangs at night.  The police department in Ghent, Belgium introduced the first organized police dog service program in 1899. These methods spread to Austria, Hungary and Germany. The German police opened the first dog training school in 1920 in Greenheide. In Britain, the North Eastern Railway Police were the first to use police dogs in 1908 to stop theft from the docks in Hull. Now the most commonly used dogs are German Shepherd Dogs, Belgian Malinois, Rottweilers, Labradors and Airedale Terriers. The Metropolitan Police of London has the largest police dog breeding program in the UK supplying not only nationally but the world with police service dogs.

All over the world, dog squads are specially treated. The handlers are specially chosen, the dogs are kept well and when they retire, they either stay with their handlers or are given for adoption to loving families. Not so in India.

We use hundreds of dogs every year, but till now there is no uniform policy evolved for them, their handlers, their food, retirement or rehabilitation. Sometimes they are auctioned off when they cannot work. Other times they are shot. While animal welfare groups have repeatedly asked for dogs to be given for adoption, no decision has been taken so far.

The dog squads in India are mainly for show. For instance, the Mumbai police force’s dog squad, comprising around two dozen Doberman Pinschers, German Shepherds and Labradors, has not been able to sniff out a single accused since 2008. In 2010, the dog squad was called in for 267 serious cases such as murder, dacoity and robbery. The squad could not detect any accused. In 2009, they were called in for 337 cases – all failures. 

 Experts cite heavy work load and poor facilities as reasons for the squad’s dismal performance. "The police force’s dogs are forced to attend 12-15 calls every day. These include visiting a crime spot, surveillance during VVIP visits, etc.

And this is typical of all dog squads across the country. There are no comfortable vehicles for transportation. The dogs work in extremely stressful conditions. According to global health standards set for sniffer dogs, a canine must be given a break after 10 minutes of sniffing. Every three months, the dogs must take a refresher course, but this does not happen. Animal hospitals get cases of overworked and sick police dogs, many suffering from lung, kidney and liver diseases, a loss of the sense of smell and acute depression. They are fed irregularly since they are taken across the city the whole day. At any given time there are dogs at the Parel Veterinary Hospital. There is no retirement age for dogs in the Mumbai Police Department .They are used until they are too ill or old.

Old dogs are either kept in the existing kennels or given to the handlers and the expenses on their food and medical treatment is drawn from the budget allocated for working dogs.  Till today there is no post retirement plan.

The Karnataka dog squad functions as a part of the armed reserve unit of the Bangalore city police. But there is total confusion in its working. The handlers are temporary with no training and identity. As a result the dogs suffer and are of little use. The supervisory officers have no professional expertise. Occasional training cannot instil professional commitment or expertise when the officials know that their career is outside the police dog squad and their interest in police dogs is transitory.  

Though the Bangalore dog squad is supposed to be a training unit for police dogs and handlers from all over the state, no infrastructure for handling such a responsibility exists. No programme schedules to train handlers is available, nor refresher 

or special courses either to the dogs or their handlers. The function of police dogs is confined to checking of the airport during VVIP visits.  

There is no systematic approach in Karnataka for purchase of foods 

for dogs. The purchase of lifesaving medicines for dogs poses problems if the drug stockist refuses to sell medicine on credit. Often, handlers are required to pay for them from their pockets. There are no specific guidelines to ensure healthy practices in dog management. So, each handler engages his dog in his own way, leading to abuse and ill-treatment of dogs. There is no method to assess the performance of handlers and their dogs and their mutual compatibility. The handlers do not maintain any records or registers, like daily expenditure registers, medical sheets or call register.

In the Tamil Nadu police dog squad, a police dog retires when it is eight-years old. Earlier, they used to be auctioned off on being retired. But now the Police Department keeps them along with those dogs that are in service. The authorities have fixed the feeding allowance of serving dogs at Rs 200 a day but retired dogs are allowed only Rs 44 a day. You can imagine what the old dogs are given to eat.

A large number of dogs have died in service in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) of cardiac arrest and kidney failure. Strangely, not a single dog has been retired by the Railway Protection Force in the last five years, though the RPF guidelines stipulate that a dog should be retired if it is found medically unfit after reaching a certain age. Officials said the dogs were not retired as it would have created a shortage. In Pune, for instance, the dog squad has two animals. A 2008 report by a committee, appointed by the Ministry of Home Affairs on police dogs at railway stations, had recommended one dog for every eight trains. By these standards, Pune should have at least 18 sniffer dogs.

Now the Union Home Ministry has prepared a blueprint to prepare a 100 canine dog squads to save troops from bomb injuries and provide them early warning against any ambush during anti-Naxal operations. The Indo-Tibetan Border Police has been tasked with the training in the dog training institutes of ITBP in Chandigarh and CRPF’s Dog Breeding and Training School CRPF which started in Taralu in 2011.The plan however seems to be ill thought out -  deploying  one dog with each battalion of ITBP, CRPF, BSF and SSB across the states . It will mean more overwork and consequently little success. The Army and the paramilitary forces already use between 2,000 and 3,000 dogs in counter-insurgency and the border areas. But the programme faces several difficulties. Too few dogs, too few trained handlers, too vast an area. There are also serious limitations in the manner in which military dogs are trained and raised. The training is harsh and conventional. No new scientific and humane methods have been adopted. There is a National Training Centre for Dogs established in 1970 in Gwalior under Border Security Force which rears pedigreed dogs and imparts training to dogs and handlers of various Central Police Organisations, State Police Forces and other law enforcement agencies of India. It has trained 3000 dogs and 2600 handlers so far.

The truth is that in India we have not yet recognised the immense potential of the working dog. How many lives would have been saved in Uttarakhand had well-trained search and rescue dogs been used.

So much money being wasted, so many dogs suffering. This government needs to make a comprehensive policy on security dogs, their wages, food, living conditions and most important, their retirement age and pensions. They need to be treated as police officers and trained and used properly.

To join the animal welfare movement contact gandhim@nic.in, www.peopleforanimalsindia.org

Will Sri Lanka Elect the Devil It Knows?

The Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa; December 11, 2014.The Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa; December 11, 2014.
BY -JANUARY 6, 2015
Subscribe to The New Yorker

If a Presidential candidate refers to himself as a devil, chances are he’s in trouble. Last week, campaigning ahead of this Thursday’s election, Mahinda Rajapaksa, the incumbent Sri Lankan President, tried hard to endear himself to an audience in the northern city of Jaffna. The crowd consisted almost entirely of Tamils, the island’s largest minority, a community that regards him with suspicion and anger. “There is a saying that the devil you know is better than the unknown angel,” Rajapaksa said. “I am the known devil, so please vote for me.” These two sentences encapsulated the swift and intriguing fall of the once-mighty President.

The U.S. military is back training troops in Iraq, but it’s a little different this time




Today's paper — Years after the U.S. military tried to create a new army in Iraq — at a cost of over $25 billion — American trainers have returned to help rebuild the country’s fighting force.
But this time, things are different.

Charlie Hebdo suspect Cherif Kouachi linked to network of French militants
Man who led deadly attack on the satirical magazine had links to disorganised web of extremists for more than 10 years 
Cherif Kouachi
Supporting images for Charlie Hebdo shooting: photos of suspects released - video

Cherif Kouachi had been jailed for his role in a network sending volunteers to fight alongside al-Qaida militants in Iraq. Photograph: AP
The Guardian home
-Thursday 8 January 2015
The prime suspect in the attack on satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo was an active member of a loose network of French militants, active for over two decades, that stretched from Syria to the UK.
Cherif Kouachi, 32, had been imprisoned for 18 months for his role in a network sending volunteers to fight alongside al-Qaida militants in Iraq between 2003 and 2005 and had been investigated for his involvement in a plan to break a veteran extremist out of prison in 2010.

'Catastrophic' situation in Syria as snowstorm hits

Channel 4 News
THURSDAY 08 JANUARY 2015
The leader of the Syrian National Coalition opposition group calls for international help as a snowstorm strikes, killing at least five people and bringing misery to thousands.
Elderly female refugee at a Lebanese camp (photo by Hany)
Speaking in Istanbul, SNC interim premier Ahmad Touma said that low temperatures and lack of tents had led to a catastrophic situation on the ground. Mr Touma said that in the past two months alone around 2,000 families had fled the violence and 800 of them had no shelter.
'Catastrophic' Situation in Syria as Snowstorm Hits by Thavam Ratna