Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

RKW Goonesekere: Renowned Lawyer, Unswerving Defender Of Human Rights


Colombo Telegraph
By Suriya Wickremasinghe -December 3, 2014 
It is too soon for us, of the Civil Rights Movement and The Nadesan Centre for Human Rights Through Law, to write a full appreciation of RKW Goonesekere, who headed our movement for so long. For the present, let us just take a glimpse at our records. Thirty six years ago we wrote of him:
R.K.W. Goonesekere
R.K.W. Goonesekere
We would like at this stage to say something about two men of distinction who have headed our movement. Our first Chairman was Prof. E.R. Sarachchandra. Our movement will always be profoundly grateful to this distinguished don and dramatist for his ready acceptance of this office at a time when many were reluctant to be identified with CRM at all. During Dr. Sarachchandra’s absences abroad our Deputy Chairman R.K.W. (Raja) Goonesekere, then Principal of the Law College, acted for him. Later Dr. Sarachchandra was appointed Ambassador to France, and we asked Raja Goonesekere to take his place. His response was characteristic– “Yes certainly, but are we sure there’s nobody better?”
CRM could not have been more fortunate in having as its head this mild mannered, scholarly man, of distinguished academic record, extraordinary integrity and deep commitment to human rights. Raja Goonesekere was no figurehead in CRM, he gave it his time and talent freely, participating in its research and analyses and signing his name to its public statements and declarations. As a result he was sometimes at the receiving end of crude attacks including in Parliament where personal jibes took the place of reasoned reply to our arguments. Some time later, legislation was passed assailing the independent status of the Law College and bringing it under control of the Ministry of Justice. Raja Goonesekere continued with his work as Registrar of the Council of Legal Education and Principal of the Law College, both as a teacher of law and with the legal research which was always his abiding interest, and he continued as before to give of his spare time to CRM. Suddenly, he found himself the target of intrigue and a shameful campaign of vilification, which culminated in his decision to resign from his job. After a short interval Raja Goonesekere, who never had any ambition other than to pursue his vocation as a teacher of law in his own country, regretfully took up a teaching post abroad. The loss to the students of the Law College, to legal education which he had served for twenty five years, and to the CRM, was great; the loss to our country was greater still.
[from the Introduction to The People’s Rights: Documents of the Civil Rights Movement of Sri Lanka 1971 – 1978]
Fortunately for us all, Raja returned to Sri Lanka a few years later and resumed his contribution to the training of young lawyers, the development of constitutional law, the promotion of civil liberties and the enrichment of the intellectual life of our land. When a vacancy occurred, he resumed his role of Chairman of the Civil Rights Movement and of the Nadesan Centre, which positions he held till he died. A whole book now remains to be written about the outstanding contribution to society of this remarkable and most admirable of men.
[ புதன்கிழமை, 03 டிசெம்பர் 2014, 11:45.01 AM GMT ]
யாழ்.மாவட்டத்தில் தொடர்ச்சியான கனமழையினால் பல தாழ்நிலப்பகுதிகளில் வெள்ளநீர் தேங்கியிருக்கும் நிலையில் பல நூற்றுக்கணக்கான குடும்பங்களைச் சேர்ந்த மக்கள் இடம் பெயர்ந்துள்ளன.
அவ்வாறு வெள்ளத்தினால் பாதிக்கப்பட்டு மக்கள் இடம்பெயர்ந்திருக்கும் காட்டுப்புலம், மூளாய், மூளாய் வேரம், பண்ணாகம், வாதரவத்தை பகுதிகளில் பாதிக்கப்பட்ட மக்களுக்கு உதவிகளைச் செய்து கொடுக்கும் படி கோரிக்கை விடுக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

“Momentum against executive presidency is unstoppable” - CBK


December 4, 2014
Love her or hate her, ex-President Chandrika Kumaratunga is a force to reckon with. Coming out of a nine-year retirement last month, the former Head of State has joined forces with a broad opposition movement attempting to abolish and reform the presidential office that she once held for 11 years. 

The declaration of SLFP frontliner Maithripala Sirisena as a common opposition challenger to President Mahinda Rajapaksa has cemented Kumaratunga’s position in the public psyche as polls fever hits the nation. As she struggles alongside Sirisena, the UNP and the civil society movement coalescing around the abolition platform, Kumaratunga is perceived as the leader of the SLFP rebellion that is threatening to crack open the ruling coalition ahead of the 8 January 2015 poll. She remains one of the fiercest critics of the Rajapaksa administration, but the fears of her children held her back from contesting as the opposition candidate in this election. 
“Momentum Against Executive Presidency is Unstoppable” - CBK by Thavam Ratna

We Printed Posters For MR On Credit In 2005: JVP


Colombo TelegraphJVP Leader, Anura Kumara Dissanayake said the heights of plundering carried out by the Rajapaksas have been made evident by the heaps of cutouts and posters featuring the President that have been put on display all over the city of Colombo.
Anura
Anura
Parliamentarian Anura Kumara Dissanayake addressing their supporters at the party’s inaugural rally for the upcoming Presidential elections said it should be probed as to how the Rajapaksas who were not equipped with enough funds to print posters during the polls in 2005, are now able to print millions of posters and cutouts to be displayed all over the country.
“It was we (JVP) who printed posters on credit for the Rajapaksas in 2005,” he said while adding that today, elections are thought of as festivals by the Rajapaksas.
He also said that the upcoming Presidential polls incur the highest expenditure ever recorded during a poll in Sri Lanka.
“We have received information that two containers full of watches bearing the image of Mahinda Rajapaksa have been imported. Moreover, they have also imported thousands of saris with blue borders and several millions are being channeled into funds that would be distributed among the public in order to bribe the voters,” he said.
Dissanayake went on to state that the people are being bribed by the very money that the Rajapaksas swindled off state resources that were meant to be put for public use.
He also added the Rajapaksas have also made preparations to spread fear throughout the country in order to intimidate voters into supporting them and to oppress dissenting views and the Opposition.
“Houses and buildings have been already bought from various parts of the island to accommodate army soldiers and thugs who would be deployed to carry out the bidding of the Rajapaksas. They come out in the night and instill fear in the hearts of the people,” he added.
Watch the full rally here;

Muslim Congress Likely To Join Common Opposition

Muslim Congress Likely To Join Common Opposition
  • Tuesday, 02 December 2014 21:05
Asian MirrorHighly placed political sources told Asian Mirror this evening that the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress, an ally of the UPFA government, was likely to join the common opposition.
Leader of the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress, Minister of Justice Rauff Hakeem, was scheduled to meet opposition leader Ranil Wickremesinghe for a crucial meeting,  this evening (02).
It was also rumoured that Hakeem had a separate discussion with former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga on the matter and the meeting ended on a positive note. However, no spokesperson from the SLMC confirmed any meeting with the former President.
The SLMC Leader was expected to convene a meeting of the party High Command, the top decision making body of the SLMC, following the meeting with the opposition leader.
An SLMC delegation, led by Minister of Justice Rauff Hakeem , met President Mahinda Rajapaksa two weeks ago, to discuss the key issues pertaining to Muslims. When asked about the meeting, SLMC Spokesman N. Kariyappar told Asian Mirror that nothing was discussed on the party's support to any party at the presidential election. "The meeting was aimed at finding solutions to some unresolved problems faced by the Muslim community of Sri Lanka," Kariyappar said.
However, political sources added that the SLMC was closely monitoring the moves of Minister Rishad Bathiudeen's party at the presidential election. Although Amir Ali, a member of the Eastern Provincial Council representing the ACMC was appointed to Parliament from the UPFA national list, he has not yet accepted the offer. Therefore, ACMC support to President Mahinda Rajapaksa at the presidential election still hangs in the balance.

Maithripala will not step into President’s House ‘after victory’

I will be busy abolishing the Executive Presidency 


article_image

by Zacki Jabbar-December 2, 2014

The Joint Opposition’s Presidential candidate Maithripala Srisena said yesterday that he would win the January 8th Presidential Election but would not step into the President’s House since he was committed to abolishing the Executive Presidency within 100 days.

Addressing a campaign meeting at Hyde Park in Colombo, Srisena, who recently resigned as SLFP General Secretary and Health Minister, said that he was on a mission to rescue the country from the abyss it had fallen into in the post conflict era with chaos and unprecedented lawlessness and corruption griping the country.

"When I am elected President on January 8, I will not go to the President’s House. It is not a place for me because I am seeking a mandate from all Sri Lankans to abolish executive presidency within 100 days of my election and replace it with a parliamentary system of government where the legislature would elect the Prime Minister," Srisena, who has picked the Swan as his symbol, pledged.

Sirisena noted that among other matters of priority would be the reintroduction of Independent Public, Elections, Police, Judicial Service and Bribery and Corruption Commissions which were abolished by the 18th Amendment to the Constitution.

A Right to Information Act and changes to the electoral system would also be speedily implemented, Srisena observed.

Emphasising that he was not overcome by the greed for power or revenge, the former SLFP General Secretary recalled being warned once by a high ranking Finance Ministry official that he (Srisena) should not be commenting about the high cost of building highways and roads, if he wished to remain in the government.

Srisena predicted that more ruling party members would defect to Opposition ranks in the coming weeks.

Leader of the UNP Ranil Wickremesinghe said that once Srisena was elected President, they would set about restoring the independence of public institutions and also weed out corruption starting from the top.

The extent of corruption in the last nine years was mind-boggling and never witnessesed in the history of this country, he noted adding that it had been one of the main reasons for the drawbacks in the economy and the skyrocketing cost of living.

Democratic party leader and former Army Commander General (Rtd) Sarath Fonseka said that the "Father" was ranked the ninth richest person in Asia while the "Son" 14th. "It is these people who are sermonizing to the common masses who are struggling to find three square meals a day."

He said January 8 would mark the end of the Rajapaksas who had wreaked havoc in the country driving fear and insecurity in the minds of the people when it should have been the opposite with the end of the war which he had led from the front and not from air conditioned offices.

Former President Chandrika Kumaratunga said that the monthly Food Bill at Temple Trees was around Rs. 25 million with an additional Rs.500,000 spent on fruits.

Corrupt government MPs had been given Rs.250 million each to spend as they wished, while the honest ones had been blacklisted and harassed. The Rajapaksa regime, she said, encouraged corruption so that it could have hold on its members.

"The government has accused us of being traitors and planning to hand over the country to the LTTE within 100 days. The traitors are all in the government and not among us. Karuna Amman, who massacred a large number of innocent civilians, has not only been made a Minister but a Vice President of the SLFP and the LTTE’s former Chief arms procurer Kumaran Pathmanathan is being given VVIP treatment and protection," Kumaratunga said.

The MoU: The Same Old Imperialist-Chauvinist Charade Wrapped Up In Bourgeois Liberal Clothing

By Surendra Ajit Rupasinghe -December 3, 2014
Ajit Rupasinghe
Ajit Rupasinghe
Colombo TelegraphMy intention here is to critically analyse the contents of the immediate program outlined in the MOU signed in support of the common oppositional candidate, Hon. Maitripala Sirisena. This is  with the objective of establishing how, and if, it addresses the fundamental structural fault-lines of the State and political system that have contributed to the prevailing political crisis. This will come in confrontation with those who hold the line of the “lesser evil”. There is no question in my mind that the Mahinda RajapaksaRegime has to be overthrown lock, stock and barrel. This is the most pressing task confronting the forces of democracy, freedom and human decency.  My task is to show that the MOU is not designed to achieve a radical restructuring of the State and a democratic transformation of the Political Order. It is designed only to displace the Regime from power. This is to keep the structure of the supremacist, hegemonic unitary State intact and consolidate the Capitalist dictatorship under new terms of imperialist penetration and neo-colonial domination.
Ranil Maithri Chandrila Fonseka 1The Lankan State is a creation of British colonialism. It was set up to transfer power from the colonial masters to their loyal local comprador agents to perpetuate the system of neo-colonial domination. The neo-colonial State has been carefully crafted and founded on the integrated principles of majoritarian hegemony and Sinhala-Buddhist supremacy. This is the neo-colonial strategy of divide and rule embedded into the foundation of the colonial State and political order. Majoritarian hegemony and chauvinist supremacy are twin strategic pillars of the Lankan State. This is the class nature and essence of the Lankan State and its particular form of Comprador Capitalist class dictatorship. The MOU has not, will not and cannot address nor even approach the task of eradicating these structures, nor questioning the basic reactionary-chauvinist class character of the State. This is because its dominant  composition is made up of political parties and forces of the very same ruling class that subscribe to this reactionary  political ideology. Some of them subscribe to this hegemonic-supremacist ideology and politics out of conviction and others for the sake of political expediency.  None would ever dare to invoke the wrath and stand up against the serpents of neo-fascism and feudal reaction. They have crept into the veins of the State and the System, including the armed forces. The MOU reveals how pitifully the Maitripala coalition has capitulated to this dominant ideology and politics.  This is why the MOU has dismally failed to give even an indication of how it proposes to solve the National Question. Let alone even approaching a solution to the National Question, could it not even mention that the oppressed Tamil people  must be liberated from military occupation? Could it not even mention their condemnation of the Gestapo attacks against the Moslems?

Phones of Maithri, 27 supporters being tapped!

phone tappingSecretary to the ministry of law and order Mahinda Balasuriya has ordered police to tap the telephones of common opposition candidate Maithripala Sirisena and 27 of his supporters and gather information.
Accordingly, a newly-established Unit 03 at the radio room of Mirihana police is tapping their phones. Those who work at this unit are barred from taking their mobile phones to their workplace. Working in shifts, three 8-hour shifts a day, they have to listen to and record the conversations.
The State Intelligence Service similarly tapped the telephones and mobile phones of Chandrika Kumaratunga, Ranil Wickremesinghe, Mangala Samaraweera, Nimal Siripala de Silva, Ratnasiri Wickremanayake, D.M. Jayaratne and Maithripala Sirisena, but could not find out the identity of the common candidate until the last moment. The SIS has now found out that all communications regarding the common candidate had been carried out in writing.
The president has tried to hit former SIS chief Chandra Nimal Wagista when the former was informed by the latter that the SIS could not find anything suspicious although they had gone through the SMS and email messages of these opposition politicians. Wagista was removed from the position last week.

“Winter”: A Novel About A Novelist


| by Laksiri Fernando( December 3, 3014, Sydney, Sri Lanka Guardian) This is a novel about a novelist, none other than Thomas Hardy. The author is Christopher Nicholson, not so well known, at least as far as I am concerned, except his previous novel, “The Elephant Keeper,” which was shortlisted for the Costa Novel Award and the Encore. The book is a Fourth Estate publication from London, 2014, and what intrigued me first was its absence of a Preface or a Forward. It is a direct hit to the story even without a contents page. Nevertheless, the 247 paged novel is separated into four parts with neatly designed twelve chapters.
The Story 
Thomas is the main character of the novel, at least at the beginning, who is introduced by the author in the first chapter in a third person narrative, along with his present or the second wife, Florence, 39 years younger to him and his secretary before. He is 84, but still active. 
“On a blue November dawn, not long before the present time, an old man might have been observed walking down the short drive that led from the house to the gate. He walked slowly, with a slight stoop, and carried a stick in his right hand. A small dog, a wire-haired terrier, accompanied him, snuffling at the vegetation on either side of the drive.”
The old man is a poet, a novelist and a writer – perhaps the wealthiest writer in the entire country - who lives at his country villa, Max Gate, surrounded by a planted forest of pine trees as a wind-breaker and beeches for the colour. He himself has planted them many years ago. Thomas is a unique nature-lover who believes or romanticizes that trees could even feel. This was a matter of conflict between him and his wife, Florence.
The author, Nicholson, has an exceptional style of introducing the story and the characters, sometimes himself and other times through the characters themselves. However, one chapter has a single style of narrative, without confusing the reader. This is what Florence says about the ‘trees,’ in a first person narrative.
“He believes that the trees must not be touched for fear of wounding them. Can trees be wounded? Trees are not sentient creatures. He talks of mutilation and disfigurement. To care for the feelings of birds and animals is one thing, yet to believe that trees are capable of suffering as human beings suffer is quite another.”
“What of my suffering?” She asks. She believes that the growth on her neck has been due to the trees.
The dispute about ‘trees’ is a constant friction and conflict between the two at their old age from the beginning to the end of the story. Then comes Gertie, Gertrude Bugler, into the conflict.
One of the celebrated novels that Thomas has written is “Tess of the d’Urbervilles,” a long time ago. It is liked by many critics, and of course by him for a particular reason, and it has been staged as a Play in London several times before the War.
The setting of the “Winter” now is mid-1920s, in semi-fictional Wessex. Although this is the third decade of the 20th century, Wessex is not yet polluted by industrialism. The place even doesn’t have a proper railway line. Max Gate (the name of the villa, if you have forgotten it) does not have electricity; only oil lamps or candles are lit in the evenings. Telephone is only a recent arrival after much insistence of Florence, yet you have to call the operator for a connection. Thomas doesn’t like to have a motor car for themselves, to the disappointment of Florence.
A local (amateur) edition of ‘Tess’ is now decided upon to be performed and Gertie is selected as Tess to the much resentment of Florence. Yet it is the blossom of Thomas’ imagination, Gertie to act as ‘pure woman of beauty and splendor.’
The Themes
The plot of the novel rotates around love, jealousy, romance, intrigue, vengeance, infatuation and old-age spousal conflict. Some predicaments of human behavior, old or young, engulfed between above traits could be gleaned through the story, characters and narratives. There are visions on such themes like environmentalism, romanticism and true nature of fiction or art. All cannot be explained in a review but some spotlights of the plot are as follows.
“The house had two maids, one called Nellie, the other Elsie, so similar in manner and appearance that he often mixed them up.
‘Mrs. Bugler has arrived, sir. And Mrs. Hardy told me to say that she is not well, sir. She hopes you can manage by yourself.’
The old man was neither displeased, nor very much surprised.”
That is how the whole matter starts. The old man is not particularly innocent. He is just 84, perhaps still full of testosterone or something else.
The ‘Tess’ is performed at the local Corn Exchange; a strange place to have a Play anyway. Gertie easily wins the glamour for her acts and looks. There are glowing reviews. To Thomas, she is always a remarkable woman. To Florence, she is just a ‘butcher’s wife.’ The class attitudes are also revealed. Gertie is anyhow selected to perform in London, to the fury of Florence. All are decided at a luncheon at Max Gate and it is almost the winter.
“I’ll walk you down,’ he said gruffly.
‘You’ll catch a cold,’ objected Florence.”
They anyhow walked to the gate slowly.
“He cleared his throat. ‘Mrs. Hardy would like the pine trees cut down. She feels they make the house too shady.’
‘I like them,’ she said.
“Gertie.’ He stopped. ‘If, in after-years, anyone should ask you – if anyone should ever ask you if you knew me, you must say, you were my friend.’ And then, unsure as to whether she understood his true meaning, which was more to do with love than friendship, he tried again: ‘If anyone asks, in times to come, what you knew of old Thomas Hardy – you were his friend. Remember that.”
The End
Gertie finally could not perform in London. Why? And how? It is a long story. It was the Winter proper. Gertie never saw Mr. Hardy again. Thomas died three years’ later and was buried strangely. He had “two funerals at the same time, one in Westminster Abbey, where they buried his body, and the other in Stinsford, where they buried his heart,” Gertie noted.
Part four or the last chapter of the novel is a short one related by Gertie herself. It is like a postscript to the whole story. Gertie reminiscences back to the summer and winter, forty years ago. Gertie had been to the ‘heart funeral’ and this is what she said.
“I hated the thought that his heart had been cut out of him, it seemed such a barbaric act, and I hated Mrs. Hardy for agreeing to it. There wasn’t a proper coffin, only a little casket, and it was impossible when you saw the casket not to think what it contained.” 
Fiction or Biography?
The way the story ends, and names and places of the novel, could leave one wonders whether this is a novel proper or a biography of Thomas Hardy (1840-1928). It may be both. One clue for the mixture is what appears in the story itself. 
Many readers of Thomas’ novels used to write letters and asked questions. One was quite persistent in asking about the exact species of the ‘amber-coloured butterflies’ in Egdon that Thomas has mentioned in one of his novels! The amber-coloured butterflies did not exist. As the story goes, “Doubtless the letter-writer would be disappointed by such information; well, but it was the truth. Just like the butterflies, Egdon itself, that vast expanse of heath described at the start of the novel, did not exist and probably never had; it was a piece of fiction that stood at a certain remove from reality.” Then it says, 
“He [Thomas Hardy] hated these literary detectives, who failed to grasp the nature of art: that it was a shaping of reality, not reality itself.” 
I have enjoyed the novel very much and could recommend to anyone. Although I am not from the field of English literature or any literature at all, I would recommend to any of Sri Lanka’s universities to incorporate it as a reader for the subject. It may expand students’ sensibility, critical appraisal and language competence. It could also be a good entry point to Thomas Hardy’s literature proper.

MoU With The JHU: Maithripala Must A Be A Deng Hsiao Peng, Not A Mikhail Gorbachev


By Dayan Jayatilleka -December 3, 2014
Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka
Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka
“I hate the goddamn system! But until someone comes along with changes that make sense, I’ll stick with it.” – Clint Eastwood as “Dirty Harry” Callaghan, in ‘Magnum Force’ (1973)
JHU Maithri MOUThose who criticize my continued ‘nonaligned’ approach to the Presidential election and the candidates, as well as my refusal to convert unthinkingly to the cause of the joint opposition, make the cardinal error of confusinggovernance, government and the State. That is not an error a political scientist is permitted; still less one of Marxian and Leninist provenance such as I am. I agree with all the criticisms made by the Opposition of the present regime and even go beyond them in some aspects. However, those are criticisms about bad governance, and require a solution in precisely that realm. Bad governance must not be confused with the structure and system of the State; the framework of the state.
While I have no problem with the prospect of a Maithripala Sirisena presidency, my problem with the Opposition’s project is that it will not merely displace the regime—which is fine by me—but will weaken the core of the state through the Constitutional ‘shock therapy’ of a 100 day abolition project. JR Jayewardene’s modernizing revolution was located in the domain of the state system; the form of the state – the shift to an elected executive Presidency. I do not think it should be fundamentally reversed or upended.Read More

Damning silence


Editorial-


SLFP dissident and Opposition presidential candidate Maithripala Sirisena is hopeful that there will be many more crossovers from the ruling coalition to help him secure the executive presidency; the government says it is confident that President Mahinda Rajapaksa will be able to spring a big surprise for the Opposition within the next few days. Elections are the times when political frogs have a field day!

Time was when the UPFA gleefully engineered defections from the Opposition and the UNP cried foul, claiming that the defectors had been bribed. In an interesting turn of events replete with irony, the shoe is now on the other foot; the government is making that allegation against its MPs who have joined the Opposition ahead of the Jan. 08 presidential election.

Navin Dissanayake, who resigned from his ministerial post the other day to throw in his lot with the Opposition presidential candidate, has accused the government of having attempted to bribe him to prevent his defection. He was offered as much as Rs. 100 million and some persons approached him for that purpose, he tells us. But, he has stopped short of naming them. What makes him baulk at naming and shaming the persons who have done something wrong and illegal? Offering a bribe to a lawmaker is a very serious offence and the onus is on Dissanayake to report the culprits to the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) without further delay.

On Sept. 24, 2013, we quoted the then Health Minister Maithripala Sirisena as having said that the tobacco industry had tried to bribe him and the amount offered was sufficient for 14 generations to live in clover in a ‘First World country’. We editorially urged him to reveal the names of the persons responsible as the public had a right to know who they were. But, he didn’t.

Chandrika Kumaratunga during her second term as President said in public that someone had offered a huge bribe to her and she had turned it down. When she was asked to name the culprit, she chose to remain silent. On March 26, 2008, commenting on bribery and corruption we called upon her to reveal the name of the culprit at least in her retirement, but to no avail.

President Rajapaksa has said recently that he has files on corrupt government politicians, but he will not go public with them. His claim is tantamount to a confession that the corrupt are being shielded by his government! Let him be urged to reveal the names of the corrupt politicians and the offences they have committed. (We know we are only hoping against hope!)

Cricketing legend turned Pakistani politician currently leading a popular struggle to restore democracy and bring about good governance in his country has famously said that nobody approached him or offered him a bribe while he was a player. What he has left unsaid is that no bribes were offered to him as he was considered incorruptible as a player. Judging him is something best left to the people of Pakistan who know him better, but the fact remains that if a person conducts himself or herself like Caesar’s wife no one will dare try to bribe him or her.

Offering a bribe to an honest man/woman is an affront to his/her dignity besides being an offence which is as condemnable as an indecent proposal a kerb-crawler makes to a decent woman. Therefore, those who go about offering bribes must be exposed so that they can be brought to book.

The Opposition big guns who claim to have been insulted in this manner ought to name the culprits. And fast! Tick-tock, tick-tock …

Two persons who objected an illegal cutout assault..!


LEN logo
(Lanka-e-News -03.Dec.2014, 5.45 PM)  A group of goons led by Divulapitiya pradesheeya sabha Chairman Mr. Indika Anuruddha and councilors Mr. Nimal Karunaratne and Mr. Asanka, of UPFA, have arrived at the residence of Mr. Thusitha Weerasinghe, of Kudagammana, today(03) morning and assaulted two persons who have been hospitalized. Mr. Weerasinghe has objected an illegal election cutout of presidential candidate Mahinda Rajapaksa which was placed opposite his house. This is the 9th incident of election related violence CaFFE has received.
Mr. Weerasinghe protested placing a cut-out opposite his residence on November 29. A group of about 15 led by the above mentioned councilors have threatened Mr. Weerasinghe who remained inside his house. However tow of his cousins, on thier way to see him, have been assaulted by the group.
"A group of people tried to place an illegal election cutout of presidential candidate Mahinda Rajapaksa on my garden. I strongly objected and the group fixed it on  an electricity pole and left. Then a group led by Indika Anuruddha arrived and demanded that I come out so they can sort out some unfinished business. They said  their government was in power and that they can place their cutouts anywhere they want. They used vulgar words and I was afraid," Mr. Weerasinghe said.
He added that he remained inside his house but two of hos brothers who stepped out were assaulted. They were initially admitted to Divulapitiya hospital but were later transferred to Dambadeniya hospital for security reasons. This is the 9th incident of election related violence CaFFE has received. These include four instances of using firearms.
You can watch the video which showed Mr. Weerasinghe protesting the placing of the cutout by clicking on 

All Eyes On Doval-Maithri Meet


| by Upul Joseph Fernando

( December 3, 2014, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) When former army Commander Sarath Fonseka flew to Mumbai, India during the 2010 presidential election, it was kept as a secret from the then government. Fonseka kept the government guessing. Many said Fonseka flew to meet officials of the South Block. The incumbent Indian Defence Secretary, Ajith Doval has chosen to fly to Colombo even before candidates hand over nominations for the upcoming presidential election. He is expected to meet common candidate Maithripala Sirisena. Doval arrives in Colombo to deliver the keynote address at the ‘Galle Dialogue 2014.’ This would be his first visit to Colombo. He will also meet UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe and former President Chandrika Kumaratunga during his stay.

Ranil rejected

After Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, assumed office, attempts made by Ranil to meet him proved futile. That failure was surprising as considering the strong relationship between the UNP and Modi’s Bharathiya Janatha Party (BJP). Moreover, Ranil was a leader who had very close links with L.K.Advani, a senior member of the BJP. When Vajpayee’s BJP formed the government in the past, Ranil had the fortune to meet Vajpayee. It could be that Ranil was not given the opportunity to meet Modi, because Ranil had failed to accomplish the task of an Opposition Leader, UNPers who maintain relations with India viewed. They also claimed that India had urged Ranil to quit the presidential race and extend support towards a common candidate. However, this is the first time the Indian Defence Secretary is meeting Ranil.
Though Chandika too, wanted to meet Modi it never materialized. The Indian Defence Secretary arrived for the first time in Colombo at a time all opposition political party leaders have united to defeat the Rajapaksas’. The government seems to have focused attention on the proposed Doval- Maithripala meet. 

It was reported in the media last week that Maithri had wanted the symbol ‘Lotus Flower’ to contest the presidential polls. The lotus flower is the symbol of the BJP. It appears that Maithri looks to pose off as Sri Lanka’s Narendra Modi. There are similarities in the past history of both Modi and Maithri. Modi’s father was a tea kiosk owner in a remote village in Gujarat. Maithri is the son of a farmer in Polonnaruwa, miles away from the capital in the country. Modi entered politics through the RSS ideology group of the BJP. Maithri entered politics through the left alliances of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP). Modi cemented his political journey through the RSS of the BJP to become the secretary of the BJP Gujarat branch. Maithri kicked off his political journey becoming the SLFP District Secretary at Polonnaruwa. 

When Modi fought against the pressure of Indira Gandhi, Maithri stood against the pressure mounted by the J.R. Jayewardene administration.

When Modi became the National Secretary of the BJP and travelled from Gujarat to New Delhi, Maithri came from Polonnaruwa to the SLFP Headquarters in Darley Road, Colombo to work in the party library. 

When Modi successfully won the confidence of BJP leader Advani, Maithri too won the confidence of SLFP leader, Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranaike. The year 2001 was very special to Modi as he became the Chief Minister of Gujarat in October that year. Later Modi became Chief Minister of Gujarat when his predecessor in the BJP Sankersingh Vagela left the BJP to form a new political party. That was also a period Modi extended support to chief minister aspirant Patel. When SB Dissanayake defected from the SLFP in October that year over differences with Chandrika, Maithri became the party General Secretary. 

Until Modi became India’s Prime Minister he was popularly known as a State leader in Gujarat. Maithri was popular as a district leader until he decided to become a presidential candidate.
That is why we state that Modi’s Defence Secretary’s meet with ‘Sri Lankan Modi’ is unique.

States Of Denial, The President And His Brother Gotabaya

Colombo Telegraph
Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha MP
Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha MP
Enemies of the President’s Promise: Grumpy 2 
So his attitude seemed to harden with the passing years. Also, sadly, even though he might not have been ambitious himself, he seemed to see himself as the principal guardian of the victory the forces had won, with an obligation therefore to block the way of those who were anxious to give more political powers to Tamil politicians. Though, under threat from the LTTE, some of these had seemed to subscribe to the LTTE ideology, in fact most Tamil politicians were moderates who were relieved that the LTTE had been vanquished. They were prepared to disavow terrorism as well as separatism, but they were anxious to exercise political power in predominantly Tamil regions, at least in terms of the Provincial Councils Act of 1987. But those who were opposed to even that limited devolution, on the grounds that it would inevitably lead to separatism, saw Gotabaya as their champion, and he came in time to articulate their views with increasing  assertiveness.
mahinda_gota - colombotelegraphAn extreme example of this came when, in 2013, with the President making preparations to have the long delayed Provincial Council election in the North, he declared publicly that it should not be held. Ironically, according to the President, he had been in favour of holding those elections a few years earlier, soon after the war ended, which would have been a sensible move, and would have led to a better result for the government. It was Basil then who had insisted on delay, on the grounds that his building programme would ensure more and more support for the government. But by 2013, more perceptive perhaps than Basil about political realities in the area, perhaps realizing too how he had contributed to increasing unpopularity, he came out strongly against having a poll. And typically this  occurred while one of the more extreme coalition partners of the government, which was seen as close to Gotabaya, had introduced a Bill to amend the Provincial Councils Act so as to water down their powers. So powerful did this combination seem, even though the evidence of elections had made it clear they had minimal popular support, that it was feared the President would back down.