Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Looking over my shoulder

Looking over my shoulder - Laura Davies
Pottuvil Tourist Police Post
A couple of weeks ago, I went on an official trip to the East.  Starting in Arugam Bay, we drove North all the way to Trincomalee, through Pottuvil, Oluvil, Kalmunai and Batticaloa.  I met with government and political interlocutors, humanitarian workers and civil society organisations, and visited temples, beaches and hospitals.

Sri Lanka’s propaganda finds a home in Washington

Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa, second right, with his brother and defense secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa. Pic: AP.
Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa, second right, with his brother and defense secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa. Pic: AP.
Asian CorrespondentBy Taylor Dibbert | @taylordibbert
Sri Lanka’s powerful defense secretary and brother of the president, Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, has recently published a lengthy article in a policy-oriented journal called PRISM. The publication of this article, particularly at a time when the Sri Lankan government has been under the microscope for alleged war crimes and ongoing human rights abuses, raises a number of questions.
Sri Lanka’s Propaganda Finds a Home in Washington by Thavam

MaRa’s inferiority complex wreaks havoc in US : Heads of State ignore his sumptuous dinner -profligacy at its worst!


LEN logo(Lanka-e-News- 29.Sep.2014, 11.30PM) Medamulana MaRa going by his self publicity circus and gimmicks after taking over the reins of the country is indulging in monumental profligacy and wasteful extravagance using up the public funds like his dowry monies only to conceal his acute inferiority complex before the annual UN general assembly, and merely to achieve just that dastardly selfish goal .
Like leaders of other countries , our own sensible leaders of the past too did not attend this conference every year because it is customary for the leaders to attend this conference only if there is some important matter affecting the country or the world is going to be discussed. In other instances , the country’s permanent representative in New York and the foreign Minister alone attend this conference , which are amply adequate, and for which purpose they are appointed and paid salaries in addition to the perks and privileges they enjoy.
Sadly however to the detriment of the country’s already crumbling economy , Sri Lanka’s present insensible leader Medamulana MaRa in contradistinction to his sensible predecessors has chosen to go on a junket every year making this conference an excuse. Though his going alone itself is bad enough , he has yet made it a habit to make pleasure trips annually for this conference with his wife , their bevy of damsels and others who know absolutely nothing except sightseeing and free excursions at state expense- thanks to MaRa.
Mind you his entourage comprised more than 70 members this time when he travelled to New York. A full two floors of the most expensive hotel ‘Waldorf Astoria’ have been reserved for his entourage, while the ‘Presidential suite ‘of Medamulana MaRa costs US $ 24000 per day ! Apart from the bedroom , it has a lobby and a conference room while the cost of a meal is US$ 175.00
This expenditure turns two fold when wife’s expenses are included. Believe it or not , MaRa is spending or rather wasting Rs. 3.4 million in Sri Lankan currency just for lodging alone per night in ‘Astoria’ .For six days , the expenditure is Rs. 20.4 million!! It is to be further noted, Heads of countries who reserved super luxury hotels like Astoria are those from most affluent countries , and not from countries like Sri Lanka where the oppressed people are perennially planning how many meals they must skip per day to eke out a living. The affluent countries are America, China, Japan , South Korea, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Even England that is rich enough did not book this hotel .
Though MaRa by staying in this hotel sought to rub shoulders with the Heads of the affluent countries and paint a wealthy image about his country , it is reported that those countries are frowning on him , and are giving the cold shoulder ,being fully aware of the poor and grief stricken masses he represents. They construe it as obscene ostentation and utter idiocy on the part of a Head of State. This Head of State who after plunging the country into irredeemable debts and overwhelming poverty indulging in profligacy of this magnitude unconscionably have rudely shocked them.
(The photograph depicts the hoisted national flags of the countries at Hotel Astoria where the Heads of States are staying .)
In addition to this wasteful extravagance , 50 luxury limousines have been hired for the traveling comforts of the MaRa entourage. The hiring charges are US dollars 50 per hour , and these vehicles have been booked for 16 hours of the day , meaning that per vehicle the hiring charges areUS $ 800 per day. The total expense for the 50 vehicles therefore per day is US $ 40,000. Hence for six days the full expenditure in SL currency is Rs. 31.2 million!!!
These super luxury traveling comforts are provided not to serve any worthy purpose on behalf of the people , but rather for the shopping sprees and sight seeing of MaRa’s wife and his bevy of cuties .These vehicles are apart from the high roof Mercedes Benz Vans hired for the cuties .
These vehicles were booked for 16 hours a day at US. $ 100 per hour or Rs. 1.25 million had been spent on these hiring vehicles . Because of MaRa’s limousine mania , a new breed of individuals have emerged. They pay US $ 50.00 per day for a vehicle that is hired out at US $ 25. 00 per day .
The worst part ? even after spending so much of public funds most recklessly and ruthlessly stemming from his inferiority complex , the speech made by MaRa at the UN session was a total fiasco. No important heads of States were present . This was also because MaRa’s speech was at 7.00 in the night. By that time , the Heads of States were meeting and greeting each other.
The next slap in the face came to Medamulan MaRa most disdainfully at the sumptuous dinner he hosted spending most lavishly. This was organized on the second floor of Matropolitan club at 60 th street yesterday (27) . Unnecessarily monies were wasted on this. For this dinner between 8.00 p.m. to 11.30 p.m. , strangely not a single head of State attended. Only some foreign Diplomats of the second tiers and beneath attended, and not surprisingly they were all stooges and lickspittles of MaRa .
Incidentally , wife of MaRa who attended a dinner at a most expensive Restaurant ‘Thulsi’ at 46 th street participated in a pooja conducted in Sinhala in a church at Saturn Island today, while MaRa left for New Jersey to inaugurate a golden fence belonging to a temple.
While the people of Moneragala in his own country are abysmally suffering without drinking water , the Head of this country on the other hand oblivious of all the sufferings of his own people right before his own eyes deemed it fit to indulge his and his cuties’ beyond anything they were ever accustomed to wasting public funds with reckless extravagance . In spite of all this ostentation and exhibitionism at state expense , MaRa and his entourage left New York for SL this evening with empty hands after a futile tour of New York . It is learnt that 8 members of his entourage have been left behind in America on the sly .

அல்வத்தைப் பிரதேசத்தில் ஆயுதம் தாங்கிய பிக்குகள்; அச்சத்தில் மக்கள்

HomeTue, 09/30/2014
மாத்தளை பண்டாரவளைக்கு அண்மித்ததான அல்வத்தைப் பிரதேசத்தில் துப்பாக்கிகள் சகிதம் பிக்குகளின் நடமாட்டம் இருந்து வருவதால் பொது மக்கள் அச்சமடைந்துள்ளனர். இது தொடர்பில் பொலிஸ் நிலையத்தில் முறைப்பாடு செய்த போது நெற்றியில் துப்பாக்கியை வைத்து அச்சுறுத்தப்பட்ட நிலையில் பொலிஸ் நிலையத்தில் அளிக்கப்பட்ட முறைப்பாட்டை வாபஸ் பெறும் நிலைக்கும் தள்ளப்பட்டிருக்கிறேன் என்று இறத்தோட்டை பிரதேச  சபை உறுப்பினர் திலக்குமார சிறி தெரிவித்தார்.
 
அல்வத்தைப் பிரதேசத்தில் கைவிடப்பட்ட நிலையில் காணப்படுகின்ற 50 ஏக்கர் காணிப் பகுதியிலேயே மேற்படி ஆயுதம் தாங்கியோரின் நடமாட்டம் இருப்பதாகவும் அவர் சுட்டிக்காட்டினார்.
 
இறத்தோட்டை பிரதேச சபையின் மாதாந்த கூட்டம் 29 ஆம் திகதி காலை அதன் தலைவர் ஜயந்த புஸ்பகுமார தலைமையில் நடைபெற்ற போதே உறுப்பினர் குமாரசிறி இவ்வாறு தெரிவித்தார்.
 
இது தொடர்பில் அவர் தொடர்ந்து கூறுகையில்;
 
கடந்த சில தினங்களாக நான் பிரதிநிதித்துவப்படுத்தும் அல்வத்தைப் பகுதியில் சீருடை தரித்த பிக்குமார் சிலர் துப்பாக்கிகளை ஏந்திய வண்ணம் நடமாடித் திரிகின்றனர். இதனால் அங்குள்ள மக்கள் பெரும் பீதிக் குள்ளாகியுள்ளனர். உயர் ரக வாகனங்களில் வந்திறங்கும் இவர்கள் இங்கு கைவிடப்பட்ட நிலையிலுள்ள சுமார் 50 ஏக்கர் காணிப் பகுதியிலேயே இவர்களின் நடமாட்டம் அதிகமாக இருக்கிறது. இது பற்றி பொலிஸாரிடம் நான் முறைப்பாடு செய்திருந்தேன். இதனால் நெற்றிப் பொட்டில் துப்பாக்கியை வைத்து கொலை பயமுறுத்தல் செய்யப்பட்டு எனது பொலிஸ் முறைப்பாட்டை வாபஸ் பெற வேண்டிய நிலைக்கு ஆளாக்கப்பட்டேன்.
 
குறிப்பிட்ட காணிப் பகுதியின் உரிமையாளர் வெளிநாட்டில் இருப்பதாகக் கூறப்படுகிறது. இக்காணிப் பகுதியில் விஜயபால மன்னர் காலத்தில் அமைக்கப்பட்ட குகையுடன் கூடிய சுரங்கப்பாதையொன்று இருப்பதாக கர்ண பரம்பரைக் கதை ஒன்றும் உண்டு. இங்கு ஏதேனும் புதையல் இருக்கலாம் என்றும் அதை தோண்டி எடுப்பதற்கே இந்த ஆயுததாரிகள் முயன்று வருவதாக மக்கள் சந்தேகம் தெரிவிக்கின்றனர். எது எப்படியாயினும் சீவர உடை தரித்துக்கொண்டு பயங்கர துப்பாக்கிகளை பகிரங்கமாகவே ஏந்தித் திரிவதும் அதன் காரணமாக மக்கள் மத்தியில் திகிலை உருவாக்குவதையும் எவ்வகையிலும் ஏற்றுக்கொள்ள முடியாது. ஆகவே, பிரதேச சபை இவ்விடயத்தில் தலையிட்டு மக்கள் மத்தியில் அமைதிச் சூழலை ஏற்படுத்த முன்வரவேண்டும் எனக் கேட்டுக்கொண்டார்.

Council members must reject procedural tactics that foreclose substantive debate

asian legal resource centreA Joint Statement by the Asian Legal Resource Centre
Excellency,
We write to express our concern about a worrying development in the Human Rights Council in the use of procedural tactics to silence important and legitimate debate on critical human rights issues and situations.
At the Council's 26th session in June 2014, we witnessed the use of a 'no-action motion' to prevent the consideration of an amendment proposed to the resolution on the 'Protection of the family and all its members', thereby preventing substantive debate. A 'no-action motion' is a procedural motion by a member of the Council that prevents the discussion of a proposal or matter in the Council. This was the first time that this stifling procedure was used in the
Human Rights Council in connection with a thematic issue. We are concerned about the prospect of similar tactics at the current session.
By virtue of General Assembly Resolution 60/251 the Council's mandate includes the promotion of 'universal respect for the protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all' (OP2) based on 'constructive international dialogue' (OP4). As a Human
Rights Council member your delegation has an obligation to 'fully cooperate with the Council' (OP9), which implies an obligation to participate in good faith in the Council's debates, to support full exercise of the right to freedom of expression and to express a position on draft resolutions and decisions and related proposals for amendment by voting when required.
With a view to the decisions and conclusions of the 27th session, scheduled to commence on Thursday, 25 September, we call on your delegation to refrain from introducing or supporting the use of 'no-action motions' and other procedural tactics that run counter to the principles governing the Human Rights Council. Supporting a 'no-action motion' with a view to avoiding substantive debate and a clear decision by the Council on a proposed resolution or amendment is incompatible with Resolution 60/251 and violates the principle of constructive dialogue.
A vote in support of a 'no-action motion' is censorship tantamount to opposition to the substantive question itself and will be seen that way. We urge your delegation not to support any such motions. Instead, we call on you to exercise your duties and responsibilities as a
Council member in such a way as to ensure full and open debate, and the resolution of issues put to the Council in a manner that ensures respect for all human rights for all.
Sincerely,
Philip Lynch
Director, International Service for Human Rights • +41 76 708 47 38
This letter is supported by:
• Amnesty International
• ARTICLE 19
• Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (Forum Asia)
• Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC)
• Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS)
• CIVICUS
• Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI)
• Conectas Direitos Humanos
• East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project (EHAHRDP)
• International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
• International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)
• International Service for Human Rights
• Human Rights Watch
• Human Rights House Foundation

Sri Lanka: One More Probe Proposed On Disappearances

Documentary-on-Lanka
Sri Lanka Brief30/09/2014
MULANGAVIL: The Presidential Commission on Disappearances and War Crimes (DWC) has asked President Mahinda Rajapaksa to establish an Investigating Team to help it pursue cases of alleged involuntary disappearance in the country.
Talking to a group of news persons at a sitting of the commission in Mulangavil in North West Sri Lanka on Sunday, the panel chairman, Justice Maxwell Paranagama, said that the charge that persons had disappeared after they had surrendered to the army or after crossing army-held territory, needs to be investigated by a competent agency.
“I have put in a request for  such a team to the President, but have not got a response so far,” Paranagama said.
Asked who might head the proposed the Investigating Team, he said that it would not be a police or army man but a retired judge so that no one can complain of a pro-state bias. The team would collect evidence and see if a case is fit for legal action. Giving an example of case in which investigation had been useful, he said that a proper probe in that case had revealed that the person who had allegedly disappeared was living in a refugee camp in Tamil Nadu.
Paranagama clarified that the recommendations of the commission and the investigating team are not binding, and it is the President’s prerogative to accept or reject a recommendation.
The commission has so far received more than 19,000 complaints of involuntary disappearance and has interviewed almost 1,300 affected families. It has had six sittings in the North Eastern Tamil-speaking districts of Batticaloa, Trincomalee and Mullaitivu. It is now conducting four sittings in Kilinochchi district.
Paranagama asserted that his panel is not under any pressure from the government. Despite propaganda about bias, people are coming to place their grievances before it, and people are speaking freely, he said.
‘Form Team to Probe SL Disappearances’  by By P K Balachandran for NIE

Assets Built On Bilateral Credit: Who Should Thank Whom?

By Lalithasiri Gunaruwan -September 30, 2014
Dr. Lalithasiri Gunaruwan
Dr. Lalithasiri Gunaruwan
Mahinda ChinaRecognising a help and expressing gratitude for it is a worthy human gesture. This applies to groups, societies, or even countries. 
Colombo TelegraphNon recognition of a helping hand given is considered unkind and disgraceful. Worse is when parties unrelated are praised when the true helper is elsewhere unrecognised.  In Sinhalese tradition, such behaviour is deplored, and the expression underlying such an attitude is “Gangen diya bee muhudata aawadiema”, or “praising the sea having drunk water from the river”.
This must be the feeling that came out from His Excellency the High Commissioner of India, Mr Sinha, when he made his chief guest’s speech at the Anagarika Dharmapala Commemoration session organised last week by the Centre for Contemporary Indian Studies of the University of Colombo.  He publicly mentioned in this speech that India has done so much for Sri Lanka, but inadequate expression of gratitude came from the Sri Lankan side, while others were frequently praised. A particular point of reference made in Mr Sinha’s speech was the Yal Devi train going to Jaffna after two and a half decades on the reconstructed Northern Railway tracks using Indian credit facilities.
As Sri Lankans, we should not ignore this as Mr Sinha’s personal opinion as he is the High Commissioner for India, thus more likely be reflecting the official sentiment of India. That is more the reason why we should examine the facts.                                               Read More  
Sri Lanka's rejection of ESVC summit will 'become more and more obvious' - William Hague

William Hague opening the End Sexual Violence in Conflict summit in London earlier this year.

30 September 2014
Former British Foreign Secretary William Hague said Sri Lanka's refusal to participate in the End Sexual Violence in Conflict summit was an “obvious gap”, adding its rejection of the campaign will become “more and more obvious” in the months ahead.

Speaking at the sidelines of the Conservative Party Conference in Birmingham, Mr Hague hailed the countries who attended the summit in London earlier this year, calling it a “summit like no other”. 


Responding to a question from the Tamil Guardian, Mr Hague said, “Sri Lanka is an obvious gap particularly since so many of these crimes have taken place there, despite all our encouragement to the Government of Sri Lanka.” 

155 governments around the world signed up to a declaration at the summit, committing to prevent and punish perpetrators of sexual violence. Sri Lanka though, did not attend the summit and refused to sign the declaration.

“Sri Lanka is a more difficult case, partly because the Sri Lankan government doesn't always want past crimes to be investigated,” added the former Foreign Secretary, who is currently Leader of the House of Commons.

Despite this “Britain has led the way in securing a resolution in the human rights council of the UN calling for an international investigation” said Mr Hague, acknowledging however that “now Sri Lanka isn't co-operating with that.”

Sri Lanka's omission was particularly notable given that other countries in the region had committed to the campaign he added.

“We have India, Burma – Burma! - involved in the PSVI (Preventing Sexual Violence Initiative) campaign. And therefore as the years go by, or the months go by, the omission of Sri Lanka will become more and more obvious.”


British Ministers Hugo Swire and Mark Simmonds previously expressed disappointment at Sri Lanka’s absence, irking the then Acting Sri Lankan High Commissioner Neville de Silva in London who said the criticism was "surely misplaced".
Mr Hague also said the issue had been “taken to media and civil society” groups on the island, recalling his visit to Colombo last year where he spoke on the topic of sexual violence.
“The main public meeting I held, which was broadcast on Sri Lankan television and reported by many papers, was about this subject," he said. "Again it's the impact we can make as Britain going to other countries and this is the thing we are talking about.”

He had earlier reiterated the weight that Britain had thrown behind the campaign, saying “Britain has enormous influence in the world. We have a seat in every table in the world.”

The work for the campaign will continue says Mr Hague, even after he steps down from the House of Commons next year.

“Failure to tackle these issues in the past sows the seeds of conflict in the future... that is the purpose often of mass rape in war. To make it harder for one community to be reconciled with the other.”

“At the heart of so many conflicts we have seen this sickening crime,” he concluded. “Unless we do something about it it will get worse.”

See our feature: Sexual Violence in Conflict: Sri Lanka (09 June 2014)

Comrade Number Eleven (XI)


September 30, 2014 

















When President Xi Jinping of the People’s Republic of China, visited India, an Indian Doordharshan television newsreader kept referring to the President as “President Eleven Jinping!”

Either the newsreader had an irrepressible sense of humour, or whole episodes of human history that passed that worthy by; she did not know that Latin was no longer the ‘lingua franca’ of the world and ‘Xi’ was pronounced somewhat like ‘Shki’ in English, rather than the numerical 11! Definitely Gibbon’s monumental work ‘The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire’ was not on that worthy’s school reading list! Doordharshan promptly fired the lady.
Comrade Number Eleven (XI) by Thavam

Jayalalithaa moves High Court against conviction, seeks bail


(Jailed AIADMK supremo Jayalalithaa…)
The Economic Times
PTI Sep 29, 2014,
BANGALORE: Seeking immediate bail, jailed AIADMKsupremo J Jayalalithaa today moved the Karnataka High Court challenging her conviction in the disproportionate assets case which cost her the chief minister's job and disqualified her from being an MLA.
Noted Supreme Court lawyer Ram Jethmalani is believed to have been drafted by Jayalalitha's legal team for arguing the bail and stay application that is likely to come up for hearing by a vacation bench tomorrow.
In her petition, she has maintained that the charges of amassing wealth against her were false and that she had acquired property through legal means.
Jayalalitha has contended that the trial court has overlooked several judgements and has not considered the binding nature of various income tax orders and decisions of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which had accepted the income and the level of expenditure pleaded by her.
The former chief minister said she had earned money by acting in films and bought property through legal means, Ashokan, Jayalalithaa's lawyer told PTI here.
C Duraipandian, member of the AIADMK legal, team said they have filed an appeal for suspension of the conviction and the sentence and have also refused to pay the Rs.100 crore fine imposed on her.
In a verdict on Saturday at the end of an 18-year old legal battle, Special Judge John Michael D'Cunha had convicted her, sentenced her to four years imprisonment and slapped a staggering fine of Rs 100 crore in the Rs 66.65 crore corruption case.
Unless the conviction is suspended immediately and later overturned by superior courts, Jayalalitha faces a bleak political future as she cannot contest elections for 10 years--four years in jail and six years after that.
Jayalalithaa also denied allegations that she has any share in Jaya Publications and was in no way connected with it.
Her aide Sasikala, her relatives V N Sudhakaran, disowned son of the former Chief Minister, and Ilavarasi have also filed applications in the High Court seeking bail and challenging their conviction.
The high court is on Dasara holidays from September 29 to October 6 and their petitions are also expected to be taken up tomorrow during a scheduled hearing by a vacation bench.
Sasikala, Sudhakaran and Ilavarasi were also convicted and sentenced to four years of jail term and fined Rs 10 crore each in the landmark judgement that saw the first conviction of a sitting Chief Minister in a corruption case.
Jayalalithaa and the other accused were held guilty of amassing wealth disproportionate to their known sources of income under the Prevention of Corruption Act and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code.
She had been accused of committing the offence when she was the chief minister for the first time during 1991-96.
With the special court giving more than a three-year jail term, Jayalalithaa can hope to get relief only from the High Court. If a stay on conviction is granted, it would nullify the disqualification of Jayalalithaa as MLA.
Jayalalithaa and the other three are at present lodged in the Parappana Agrahara central jail here.

BBS Wimalajothi Misleads People: All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama

Kirama Wimalajothi Thero
Kirama Wimalajothi Thero

Colombo TelegraphSeptember 30, 2014 
The All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama has strongly condemned the information presented by Kirama Wimalajothi thero about the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama at BBS conference, held at the Sugathadasa Indoor Stadium.
Issuing a statement today the ACJU said; “The venerable thero has misled those present, stating that the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama is a recently established and extremist organisation.”
We publish below the statement in full;
The All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama statement opposing the ideas expressed at the Bodu Bala Sena Conference on 2014 .09.28
The Bodu Bala Sena is unrivaled in the history of Sri Lanka in its campaign of insulting other religions and posing a threat to the harmony and peaceful co-existence between the ethnicities. It is extremely hurtful that they would choose to degrade, insult and humiliate Islam, a resplendent religion that teaches the great values of equality, brotherhood, and humanity; with a history of 1500 years and followed with unwavering faith by over 1620 million people worldwide.
The All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama is the apex body that is tasked with providing religious guidance for the Muslims of Sri Lanka. This is an organization with no political affiliations. Established in the year 1924, it has since been engaged in its duties diligently and continuously, and the Muslim community of Sri Lanka carries out its religious and social work under its guidance.Many media outlets reported excerpts of the speech made by the leader of the Bodu Bala Sena, Ven Kirama Wimalajothi Thero on 28 – 09 – 2014 in Colombo at its ‘Mahaa Sanga Samuluwa’ conference. We strongly condemn the false information presented by the venerable thero about the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama at this conference, held at the Sugathadasa Indoor Stadium and attended by members of the clergy and the lay population. The venerable thero has misled those present, stating that the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama is a recently established and extremist organization.
The contributions of the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama to the motherland during the times of conflict in the past, and in the post conflict era are well recorded facts known by all. Labeling this responsible organization that constantly promotes religious coexistence, patience and unity, as an extremist organization by a religious leader, is a grave mistake.
This country has a security apparatus, and an intelligence apparatus. At a time when all these high-level organizations are issuing statements that there is no terror activity among the Muslims of Sri Lanka; we see it as truly amusing that the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama is being identified as an extremist organization by some elements.
We express our dissatisfaction in the strongest terms, at the expression of racist ideas at this conference held for the purpose of inciting tensions.
We would like to ask Ven. Vimalajothi Thero if he could present any evidence proving the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama’s involvement in inciting or supporting violence, at any time. We would also like to ask who could deny the fact that, even when the Muslim community was viciously attacked and their shops and properties were set on fire, it was the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama that urged them to practice patience and responsible behavior. Furthermore, we would like to emphasize that the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama has been an organization dedicated to peace, harmony and co-existence at all times.
We would like to question what right the venerable thero has, to label the Muslim community’s apex religious organization as an extremist organization. It seems that the venerable thero hoped to incite the Muslim populace by expressing such outrageous ideas, and therein start a new drama. On many previous occasions too, the venerable thero and members of his organization have attempted to prod the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama. At every such instance we have requested them to refrain from such activities. The venerable thero’s actions are contemptible, and should be rejected with disgust. The venerable thero should change his mind-set and his ways. The All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama would also like to request that the venerable thero withdraw the wrongful statements made by him.
The All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama also deeply condemns the attempts made at this conference to label organizations such as the Muslim Council and the Shoorah Council, which are engaged in community development and social work, as extremist organizations. We strongly denounce the actions of Ven. Galagodaatte Gnanasara Thera, who, with the immature intention of creating a great divide between the Muslim and non-Muslim community of the country ignorantly chose to interpret verses from the Qur’an and traditions of the prophet; in much the same way the four blind men described an Elephant. We are also in the process of producing the correct interpretation of the same as soon as possible. Many of the other ideas expressed at this conference too are extremely upsetting. The All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama is studying these in more detail.
On behalf of the entire Muslim community of Sri Lanka, the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama humbly requests that the actions of those who insult religions should be immediately brought to an end, and that His Excellency the President and the venerable Maha Sangha should pay immediate attention to this issue.
It has become a global phenomenon for extremists to point the finger of extremism at others, to hide their own nature. We see most of the ideas expressed at this conference as being unconstitutional. Totalitarian Fascism is not an ideology that accepts the existence of any religion. The constitution has ensured the protection of all ethnic groups and religions, and presenting totalitarian fascist ideas to deny those rights, raises serious legal questions. We believe it is now time that all Sri Lankans including the venerable Maha Sangha  and the moderate Sinhalese who form the vast majority of  the population, came together hand in hand to reject such fascist ideologies and create an environment of peace and harmony in our motherland.
Ash-Sheikh Fazil Farook
Secretary – Media Division
All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama

BASL seeks expert opinion on MR’s third term

mr 30The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has sought legal opinion from foreign constitutional experts on whether the Constitution allows President Mahinda Rajapaksa to contest for a third term, a senior member of the BASL said yesterday.
BASL President Upul Jayasuriya said expert legal opinion was extremely vital if anyone was going to challenge the declaration of a presidential election by Elections Commissioner in the wake of the President deciding to call a presidential election and contest for a third term before completing his full term of six years which ends in November 2016.
Speculation is rife that President Rajapaksa was mulling the idea to call for a presidential election after completing four years of his term on November 19 this year. Under the Constitution a President is entitled to call for a presidential election after completing four years of his or term of office.
“Yes, we have sought legal opinion from a Professor of the Constitutional Law in a foreign university on the constitutionality of President Rajapaksa contesting for a third time.
“We are awaiting his opinion on this issue to take a final decision on the course of action we should take on this matter,” Mr. Jayasuriya said.
He told Daily Mirror the opinion of Sri Lankan constitutional experts would also be sought before a final decision but did not elaborate on whether the legal action would be a collective act of the BASL or by a team of lawyers challenging the declaration of a presidential election.
“All depends on the opinion of foreign and local constitutional experts and we expect a response from them shortly. However, it is crystal clear the there is a grave constitutional issue here,” Mr. Jayasuriya said.
The doubts about President Rajapaksa’s constitutional rights to contest more than on two occasions developed into a debate in social and political circles and in the media when retired Chief Justice Sarath N. Silva said he would challenge the legality of the President Rajapaksa contesting for a third term.
His contention is that the 18th Amendment to the Constitution was enacted on September 9, 2010 and President Rajapaksa was elected for the second term on January 27, 2010. Therefore, the 18th Amendment does not apply to President Rajapaksa’s Presidency and as a result he cannot contest in a Presidential Election again.
Mr. Silva argued that the 18th Amendment did not have any retrospective effect and was effective only from September 9, 2010 onwards. Article 31 (2) of the Constitution says, “No person who has been twice elected to the office of the President shall be qualified thereafter to be elected as President.”
“He should have removed this clause before taking oaths and implemented the 18th Amendment. He should have made it clear that at the time he takes oath he could contest for the Presidency any number of times. It was a dishonest Amendment to the Constitution,” Mr. Silva declared in an interview given to Daily Mirror in July.

Casinos in ‘Port City’

lankaturthTUESDAY, 30 SEPTEMBER 2014
It is revealed that casino project is the main aspect of the construction of the Colombo Port City Project that was launched by Chinese President Xi Jinping and President Mahinda Rajapaksa on the17th.  The budget is estimated to be Rs.1950 billion.
The video released by the organizers of the project to advertise Colombo Port City reveals the scheme. It reveals that, among other entertainment facilities, casino centers would be constructed in the ‘city’.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s government had on numerous occasions stated that no casinos would be allowed to be built in the country. Political parties, Maha Sangha and different mass organizations have opposed the move to make the country a gambling den.

MCSL Raises Concerns Over Gnanasara’s Threats

Gnanasara |Picture courtesy Foreign Correspondents’ Association of Sri Lanka Facebook page
Gnanasara |Picture courtesy Foreign Correspondents' Association of Sri Lanka Facebook page

Colombo TelegraphSeptember 29, 2014
The Mulim Council of Sri Lanka (MCSL) has raised concerns over the explicit threats that have been levelled against their organisation by the General Secretary of the  Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) during the convention of Buddhist monks that was held this Sunday.


MCSL Vice PresidentHilmy Ahamed, in a letter to President Rajapaksahas written that during the convention held on Sunday at the Sugathadasa Stadium, the controversial monk had made public threats against the MCSL stating that the organisation would be ‘taken care of’ following the conclusion of the event and has urged the President to intervene against the intimidation and threats posed by BBS and other extremist organisations.
He has pointed out that it is this type of rhetoric that would tarnish the good name of Sri Lanka in the international arena and goes on to state that they are raising concern overGnanasara‘s comments not simply as Muslims but as concerned citizens of this country.
Commenting on the context in which Gnanasara had made this threat, the MCSL has stated that they along with several other Muslim organisations raised concerns over the visit of controversial Burmese monk Ashin Wirathu due to his sermons that led to the massacre of thousands of Burmese Muslims. Ahamed has pointed out that it was not simply them and even a number of government ministers including AHM Fouzie, Rauff Hakeem, Rishard Bathiudeen and Faizer Mustapha too had objected to the visit of Wirathu.
Against the backdrop of the anti-Muslim sentiments that have been propagated by certain extremist Buddhist monks, the MCSL states they were concerned of the possibility of Wirathu’s visit disrupting the peaceful coexistence between religion and ethnic communities in the country.
“We were also concerned of his visit further contributing to the allegations on human rights violations directed towards Sri Lanka,” he has noted.
While noting the manner in which Gnanasara has managed to remain unpunished by law despite his virulent speeches and misquotation and blasphemous comments regarding the Quaran that has resulted in a propagation of hatred against Muslims, Ahamed has noted that they have taken all possible steps to address such actions such as the ongoing case at the Colombo Magistrate Courts and the complaint that has been made at the Religious Police division at the Ministry of Buddha Sasana against the Gnanasara’s comments.