Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Will Israel Lift the Blockade and Save Gaza from Drowning?

Dec-18-2013

Two deaths have been reported by the Ministry of Health in Gaza, and hundreds suffered weather-related injuries
Gaza flooded
According to Israel's Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, the rainfall led to a lot of excess water which couldn't drain away, so 'the Israeli authorities resorted to discharging the excess water into the Gaza Strip'. Photo Special to Salem-News.com
(SALEM) - During the last six days, nearly 7,000 Palestinians have been displaced in the Gaza strip, forced to evacuate their homes due to heavy rains from the winter storm, called Alexa, which caused floods and torrents of raging water through the streets.
"Large swathes of northern Gaza are a disaster area with water as far as the eye can see. Areas around Jabalia have become a massive lake with two meter high waters engulfing homes and stranding thousands,” stated UNRWA spokesperson Chris Gunness (United Nations Relief and Works Agency).

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

சிறிலங்கா நிலவரங்களில் இருந்து பாடம் கற்றுக்கொண்டுள்ளோம்; பான் கீ மூன்

news
17 டிசெம்பர் 2013, செவ்வாய்

சிறிலங்காவின் அண்மைய நிலவரங்களில் இருந்து பாடம் கற்றுள்ளதாக, ஐக்கிய நாடுகளின் பொதுச்செயலர் பான் கீ மூன் தெரிவித்துள்ளார்.
ஐ.நா பொதுச்செயலர் பான் கீ மூன் நேற்று நியுயோர்க்கில் இந்த ஆண்டின் இறுதி செய்தியாளர் சந்திப்பை நடத்தினார்.

இதன்போது, “2013ம் ஆண்டில் உங்களால் முன்னெடுக்கப்பட்ட கொள்கை நகர்வுகளில் ஒன்றான, போருக்குப் பின்னர் சிறிலங்காவின் முன்னிலைத் திட்டம் குறித்து, நீங்களும், பிரதிப்பொதுச்செயலரும் பேசியிருந்தீர்கள். தற்போது இந்த திட்டம் செயற்பாட்டில் உள்ளதா? அது ஐ.நாவின் கொள்கையா?

இன்றுகாலை பிரதிப்பொதுச்செயலரும் சிறிலங்காவின் பாதுகாப்புச்செயலர் கோத்தாபய ராஜபக்சவும் சந்தித்துள்ளது குறித்து விபரம் தேவை? இருவருக்கும் இடையிலான எந்த உறவும் இருக்கிறதா? என செய்தியாளர்கள்  கேள்வி எழுப்பினார்.

அதற்குப் பதிலளித்த ஐ.நா பொதுச்செயலர் பான் கீ மூன், “இந்த உரிமைகள் முன்னிலை நடவடிக்கைத் திட்டம், நாம் சிறிலங்காவின் அண்மைய நிலவரங்களில் இருந்து என்ன கற்றுக் கொண்டோம் என்பதை அடிப்படையாக கொண்டது.

நான் ஒரு நிபுணர் குழுவை நியமித்தேன் என்பது உங்களுக்குத் தெரியும். அந்தக்குழு, ஐ.நா எல்லாவற்றையும் நிறைவேற்றியதா, சரியானமுறையில் செயற்பட்டதா என்று பார்க்குமாறு என்னைக் கேட்டுக் கொண்டது.

நாம் ஒரு தீவிரமான உள்ளக ஆய்வை மேற்கொண்டோம். இதன் பெறுபேறாகவே, நாம் மிகவும் முக்கியமான செயல்திட்டத்தை உருவாக்கியுள்ளோம்.

நிச்சயமாக, இந்த செயல்திட்டம், குறிப்பிட்ட ஒரு நாட்டையோ அல்லது ஒரு விடயத்தையோ இலக்கு வைத்து உருவாக்கப்பட்டதல்ல. இது எல்லா நாடுகளுக்கும், எல்லா விவகாரங்களுக்கும், எல்லா சூழ்நிலைகளுக்கும் பயன்படும்.

அதனால் தான், இதனை நான் ஐ.நா பொதுச்சபையில் எனது பலமான பரிந்துரைகளுடன் சமர்ப்பிக்க வேண்டியிருந்தது. ஐ.நா பொதுச்சபைத் தலைவர் உறுப்புநாடுகளுக்கு அதை விநியோகித்து வருகிறார்.

எனவே இது ஒரு மனித உரிமைகளைப் பாதுகாக்கவும், எந்த விவகாரத்திலும் மனிதஉரிமை மீறல்கள் இடம்பெறுவதை தடுக்கவும், இது ஒரு வழிகாட்டியாக இருக்கும். இதில் நான் உறுதியாக இருக்கிறேன்.

இந்த விடயம் தொடர்பாக, நான் எனது மூத்த அதிகாரிகளுடன்  கலந்துரையாடியுள்ளேன்” என அவர் குறிப்பிட்டுள்ளார்.
Secretary-General's year-end press conference [full transcript]


http://www.un.org/sg/img/banner_sg.jpgNew York, 16 December 2013
Q:  Thanks for doing this briefing, and we hope to have more of them in 2014. I wanted to ask you about one of your policy moves in 2013, this post-Sri Lanka Rights Up Front Plan that both you and the Deputy Secretary-General have spoken about. What I wanted to know: is the plan now effective? Is it UN policy? I notice that the Deputy is meeting with Sri Lanka’s Defense Minister, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, this morning, and I wanted to know: is there any relation between the two?
Finally, someone said, I am sure you have seen this criticism by Medecins Sans Frontieres about the UN – what they describe as inaction in Central African Republic, of sitting in bases, maybe out of security concerns, but not going out and helping people in Bossangoa and Bangui. Do you see any relationship between that plan and the need to take humanitarian action on the ground?  Thank you very much.
SG: First of all, on this Rights Up Front Action plan, it is what we learned from the recent situation in Sri Lanka. As you know, I established a Panel of Experts and the Panel of Experts requested me to see whether the United Nations had done all… addressed properly. We had a very serious internal review. As a result of this we established this very important action plan. Of course, this Rights Up Front Action Plan is not aiming at any particular country or any particular case. This will be used for all countries and all cases, all situations.  That is why I have submitted this to the General Assembly, with my strong recommendation.  The President of the General Assembly has circulated to the Member States, so that this will be a sort of guideline to protect human rights, and prevent any further possible human rights violations in any cases. I am very firm. We discussed this matter even this morning among our senior advisers.                                      [full transcript]

Secretary-General's year-end press conference [full transcript]

http://www.un.org/sg/img/banner_sg.jpgNew York, 16 December 2013
Good morning, Ladies and Gentlemen,

“ TOWARDS THE RECONCIATION AND REBUILDING OF OUR NATION"  PASTORAL LETTER  FROM THE CATHOLIC BISHOPS' CONNFERENCE,  SRI LANKA
http://www.archdioceseofcolombo.com/images/abn_back_header_top.jpg
[ Fr.Sunil De Silva - 11.12.2013 ]
PASTORAL LETTER ( English ).............. F
PASTORAL LETTER ( Sinhala ).............. F
PASTORAL LETTER ( Tamil )................. F

His Eminence Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith, the Archbishop of Colombo and also President of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference in Sri Lanka (CBCSL), presided together with the other Bishops at the Press Conference held on 11th December 2013 at the Bishops’ Conference Secretariat, at Borella, Colombo 08, on the occasion of issue of the PASTORAL LETTER, titled “ Towards the Reconciliation and rebuilding of our Nation”.

LLRC and reconciliation process: GoSL report to UNHRC CCPR Sri Lanka session


Tuesday, December 17, 2013

SRI LANKA BRIEF8. LLRC and reconciliation process
70. His Excellency President Mahinda Rajapaksa appointed the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) in May 2010 in order to strengthen the national reconciliation process and ensure the dividends of peace to all Sri Lankans. 

The Coming Of The Indian Army

By Rajan Hoole -December 17, 2013
Rajan Hoole
Rajan Hoole
Colombo TelegraphThe Indo-Lanka Accord and Sri Lanka’s Fault Lines: July 1987 – Part – 6
There is still a lack of clarity about the arrival of a large contingent of the Indian Army in Sri Lanka. Mrs. Bandaranaike, the SLFP, MEP and their extremist allies held that the arrival of the Indian troops was an attack on Sri Lanka’s sovereignty and a manifestation of Indian expansionism. In theory, the implementation of the Accord only required a small contingent of Indian troops as observers to oversee the surrender of arms by Tamil groups and the setting up of the Interim Council. It then seemed inconceivable that the LTTE would cause serious problems that would plunge the Tamil people into a crisis after securing a political settlement that was unimaginable only a few months earlier. There was also no purpose in India forcing Sri Lanka to accept the stationing of a large number of Indian troops on a temporary basis for an unspecified goal and with no legal foundation.
Ronnie de Mel, who was then Finance Minister, said at a meeting in Eheliyagoda on 1st November 1988, supporting Mrs. Bandaranaike for president, that Jayewardene had asked the Indian Government for 3000 Indian troops after consulting his service chiefs. This he did because he was in a difficult position owing to anticipated violence in the South. This assessment on Jayewardene’s part is also implicit in the discussions recorded in former Indian High Commissioner J.N. Dixit’s Assignment Colombo.
The question about Indian troops was posed to Hector Abhayawardana, a leading member of the LSSP, which supported the Accord. He responded, “The Indian troops came here at Jayewardene’s request. There is absolutely no doubt about it. Jayewardene was unhappy about India pushing him to reach a political solution. But in July 1987 he recognised that he could not face problems on three fronts – the SLFP and allies, the JVP, and the LTTE. That is why he asked for Indian troops to look after the North-East.”
He described the SLFP’s position on the matter as sheer opportunism and acknowledged that during the 1971 JVP insurgency when his party and the Communist Party were in a coalition government with the SLFP, Indian troops had guarded key installations in Sri Lanka. He added, “India then offered to help us and we and the Communist Party urged Prime Minister Mrs. Bandaranaike to get all the help she could. We had no problem about getting help from India. In allying with the JVP in July 1987, the SLFP was not looking any further than bringing down Jayewardene.”
The same Indian Air Force flights which brought Indian troops to Palaly, transported Sri Lankan troops from Palaly to Colombo before flying back to India.
The Left and Other Pro-Accord Sections
The main Left parties – the LSSP, CP, NSSP and SLMP – and several activist groups in Colombo such as the Movement for Inter-Racial Justice and Equality and individuals such as Godfrey Goonetilleke, to their credit, supported the Accord publicly for the political solution it offered the ethnic question. The price they paid for this principled position was to become isolated and be subject to death threats and the patriotic venom of the JVP. The CP, LSSP, NSSP and SLMP contested the first Provincial Council elections in the seven Southern provinces in April 1988 as the United Socialist Alliance.                                 Read More
*From Rajan Hoole‘s “Sri Lanka: Arrogance of Power  - Myth, Decadence and Murder”. Thanks to Rajan for giving us permission to republish. To read earlier parts click here

800 Tamil families displaced in Sampur lands being acquired for company owned by Rajapaksa clan

SRI LANKA BRIEFMonday, December 16, 2013

Meera Srinivasan
A white, rectangular board with Sinhala and Tamil letters appears once every few metres along the iron fence around a huge expanse of land in the sea-facing town. 
‘Ilangai Minsara Sabaikkuriya Kaaniyaagum. Utpravesithal thadai’ [This land belongs to the Ceylon Electricity Board. Entry is banned] reads the board. This is where a 500-MW capacity, coal-fired power plant will come up in a few years from now in a joint project between Sri Lanka and India. 

For India, the project is a feather in its cap. It is the National Thermal Power Corporation’s (NTPC) first international joint venture, through the Trincomalee Power Company Limited (TPCL) where it holds 50:50 stakes with the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB). 

For Sri Lanka — which currently consumes 2000 MW of power a day — the 2X250 MW-capacity plant bears promise of meeting the shortfall in its power requirement. 
For about 800 families in the area though — primarily Tamils — the project, indirectly, has spelt misery. “The misery of living like refugees in your own place,” as Bagyarathinam Yogeswari put it. She is among those who lost their land due to the upcoming plant. The case of Sampur illustrates the problematic issue of control over land in Sri Lanka’s devolution debate.
The territory earmarked for the plant itself — spanning 500 acres — is nowhere near her home. “It is actually coming up a little far away from my land, but still they [Sri Lankan government] have taken over land owned by many of us. They say it is for the plant,” she says. 

The acquisition has triggered protests in the area.

During the final phase of the war, thousands living in and around Sampur were displaced to neighbouring Batticaloa district. 

They returned at the end of the war and now find that their land has been aquired. Some remain in welfare camps while others have been resettled in three villages. 

CEB Chairman W.B. Ganegala told The Hindu that the power plant needed only 500 acres and that the Board had not acquired more than this. Only seven families were displaced when this land was acquired and they have been given alternative homes nearby, he said. But locals say an additional 1,000 acres have been taken over by the Sri Lankan government for a private company. 

 Additional land acquired for private company, claim Trincomalee displaced 

The acquisition of an additional 1,000 acres the Sri Lankan government in the name of the Ceylon Electricity Board-National Thermal Power Corporation joint power project has triggered protests in the area. 

A lawyer who has taken up the case of the displaced people says the acquisition is for a private company backed by the Sri Lanka Board of Investment that is coming up in the special economic zone here that was gazetted in 2006. 

“The additional land has been acquired for a company called Gateway that is said to be owned by a close relative of the President,” says Tamil National Alliance parliamentarian and lawyer M.A. Sumanthiran who is appearing on behalf of 219 of 800 families displaced from the land. 

The case will be heard again on December 20. 

M.M. Nayeemudeen, Additional Secretary, Ministry of Resettlement says the Ministry was trying to negotiate with the BOI for land to resettle at least some of the former occupants.

Residents are hoping that an Indian Housing Scheme for war affected people in Sampur said to be seriously considered by New Delhi may provide some relief to them. 

TNA leader and veteran parliamentarian R. Sampanthan — who is from Trincomalee — says despite Economic Development Minister Basil Rajapaksa’s assurance to the parliament that the issue will be addressed, no concrete steps have been taken. 

In October 2011 Economic Development Minister Basil Rajapaksa told Parliament that “[a]ny land which is not necessary and which will not be acquired for the construction of the power plant will be given back to these people and they will be resettled.” 

Over two years later, the people of Sampur are still waiting to get back to their land. Residents are hoping that an Indian Housing Scheme for war affected people in Sampur being seriously considered by New Delhi may provide some relief to them. 

Solving Kidney Disease In Dry Zone

By Chandre Dharmawardana -December 17, 2013 
Prof. Chandre Dharmawardana
Prof. Chandre Dharmawardana
Colombo TelegraphReverse osmosis, and bio-scavengers for cleaning the water and soil in areas affected by Kidney disease
MapWhen kidney disease of uncertain origin (CKDU) appeared in the North-central province in the mid-1990s, some commentators hastened to claim that this was bio-terrorism associated with the Eelam wars. Today, a variety of opinions are touted regarding the origin and prevention of  the CKDU epidemic. News reports tell us that cases have been noted in other `dry zone’  ares like Hambantota and Jaffna. Places like Jaffna and other dry-zone towns are extremely vulnerable because of the rapidly increasing population while the water table remains limited.
A number of authors have raised the possibility of using special plants that accumulate metal toxins as a means of purifying the water.  Others have suggested using reverse osmosis.
Last October when I was in Colombo I gave several talks in symposia on Kidney disease, e.g., one of them  was at the Gannoruwa Institute of agriculture, while another symposium was at the Professional Institute in Colombo. I also raised this question of water hayacinth-like plants (water hayacynth, Japan jabara, lotus root etc), or even Murunga, and their capacity to extract and concentrate toxins from polluted water. This point has been raised by many others as well. Also, many of the relevant plans are listed in the Sri Lankan plants website (http://dh-
web.org/place.names/bot2sinhala.html) that I maintain.     Read More

Sri Lanka mulls Mandela's reconciliation model

AFP
yahoo-Mon, Dec 17, 2013Sri Lanka is considering a South African-style reconciliation commission nearly five years after crushing Tamil separatists in an offensive that triggered international allegations of war crimes, a minister said Tuesday.

Information minister Keheliya Rambukwella said President Mahinda Rajapakse, who attended a memorial service for former South African president Nelson Mandela in Johannesburg last week, was trying to replicate the late civil rights icon's reconciliation bid.
"We are seriously looking at the possibility of having something like the (South African) Truth and Reconciliation Commission," Rambukwella told reporters in Colombo after the first cabinet meeting following Rajapakse's return from South Africa.
Sri Lanka is under international pressure to probe allegations that its troops killed up to 40,000 Tamil civilians in the final months of defeating Tamil Tiger rebels in 2009.
"There is a discussion going on (inside the government) about a Truth and Reconciliation Commission," Rambukwella said. "We can also build on the structures we already have."
He gave no further details, but official sources said Sri Lanka was already in talks with South African authorities to secure their help for a TRC along the lines of the one South Africa adopted after the end of apartheid.
The TRC worked on the basis of restorative justice rather than punishing offenders of gross human rights abuses.
At a Commonwealth summit hosted by Colombo last month, Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron warned that he would push for an international inquiry into Sri Lanka's alleged war crimes under the auspices of the UN unless Sri Lanka ensures accountability by March.
The government has already rejected Cameron's deadline, but official sources said the government was also keen to establish a new mechanism to address reconciliation and build on a local investigation that called for a wider probe.
Sri Lanka's small but influential Catholic church warned last week that foreign intervention would be inevitable unless Colombo addressed international concerns over accountability for alleged war crimes.
In a pastoral letter, the church warned that failure on the part of Colombo to ensure accountability could trigger international investigations that would be a "serious threat to the sovereignty of the country".
The UN estimates that the Tamil conflict had cost at least 100,000 lives between 1972 and 2009.

HC directs to implead Govt officials as respondents

Logo 
The Madras High  today directed to implead the Defence Secretary, Secretary of External Affairs and Deputy Director General of Indian Coast Guard as respondents on a petition seeking to cancel the proposed sale of two war ships to 

Justice V Sudhakar and Justice S Vaidhyanathan of Madurai Bench also posted the case for hearing to January 7 next year. 

Earlier the court had ordered the Cabinet Secretary, Government of , to respond to three queries on the proposed sale of the war ships to Sri Lanka. 

The court wanted to know about the "mechanism and arrangement" of these ships and by when these ships are likely to be sold to Sri Lanka. 

The petitioner K Stalin, a city based advocate, in his petition sought a direction to cancel the proposed deal as it was apprehended that the ships could be deployed against Indian fishermen fishing in the Palk Straits. 

The deal was insensitive to the strong sentiments in  against Sri Lanka which was facing allegations of human rights violations against Lankan Tamils, he contended.

Gota Goes To The UN

December 17, 2013
Secretary to the Ministry of Defence and the Rajapaksa regime’s most powerful official has returned to the United States where he is scheduled to hold meetings with United Nations officials in New York.

Gotabaya Rajapaksa
Gotabaya Rajapaksa
Colombo TelegraphThe Defence Secretary whose visit to America – where he is a citizen – has remained under wraps, held secret discussions with UN Deputy Secretary General Jan Elisson on Monday (16).
Requests for a briefing about the meeting at UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon’s end of the year press conference were denied citing that read outs were not usually provided for meetings with the Deputy Secretary General of the UN, New York’s Innercity Press reports.
The high level meeting has come as a major shock to UN observers givenGotabaya Rajapaksa‘s role in alleged war crimes haunting the Rajapaksa regime and the allegation by UN experts that 40,000 Tamil civilians were killed in the war’s final months.
Gotabaya Rajapaksa also undertook a top secret visit to New Delhi recently, where he met with Indian National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon and External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid. It was his first visit to New Delhi since taking up the top post in his brother’s administration.
(Lanka-e-news-08.Dec.2013, 10.45 P.M.)Lanka e news learned that the American Intelligence Service has requested a report from Italian Intelligence about Gotabhaya Rajapakse for his meeting with a leader of the LTTE recently, as it is a banned terrorist organization in the United States.

The LTTE leader whom Gota met in his Italian visit is a well known wanted terrorist by the International Intelligence Services and is absconding their security network.

The LTTE terrorist group in the latter part of the war negotiated many deals in Europe for their weapon supplies through this terrorist leader. The well known terrorist leader “K.P” has only provided money necessary to weapon purchases. This terrorist visited many countries such as Ukraine, Russia, Cambodia and Vietnam and made a number weapon deals. He has amazing languages skills and speaks many languages. There is much information received about his illegal activities but unable to disclose as this matter is now under investigation.

The United States is deeply concerned about Gotabhaya Rajapakse being a United States Citizen dealing with terrorists such as the one well known to the intelligence in violation of their laws. LTTE is a listed terrorist group in the United States. Making deals with the LTTE terrorist group inside or outside of Sri Lanka is subject to their investigations. There is no credible report that Gotbhaya has renounced his United States citizenship according to the IRS( Internal Revenue Service). Every United States citizen must file tax returns with the IRS. Unless one informs the IRS for renunciation of citizenship. IRS under the regulation discloses to the public of such names periodically. Further renunciation of citizenship is a matter to the United States Department of State and there is no such information available to the public. 

Gotabhaya Rajapakse may be holding an office as Secretary of Defense in Sri Lanka but he is not a law enforcement officer, therefore his dealing with terrorists are prohibited and only probable cause is required to make a case under the existing laws. Further no government can give permission to Gota to deal with Terrorists as the United States prohibits any dealing with terrorists. For this reason his activities specifically dealing with LTTE terrorists is a matter to the United States and such dealings are matters to be investigated by the US Intelligence. Further at the time Gota became the Secretary of Defense, he was a United States Citizen and then validity of Sri Lankan citizenship (if he has one) is a matter to be challenged in the United States. He may be immune from the Sri Lankan judicial system but not from the United States as he was a United States citizen and at the time he obtained citizenship he took an oath to abide the laws of the United States. Under these circumstances it is unavoidable to the United States Intelligence to question him whether he has violated the United States laws. Therefore the Intelligence is arguing that the report from the Italian Intelligence is essential for investigation purposes.

In the mean time Gota’s secret dealings with LTTE created paranoia in the Rajapakse regime. Gota’s secret mission with LTTE leader was not known and not informed to the President brother. Gota has a secret agenda that did not inform about the dealing with LTTE leader after he returned to Sri Lanka. Namal has shown the E-news report to his father as it was the first report that reveals Gota’s secret mission. He has told his father that “ father at least now open your eyes about your own brothers, I told you that they are waiting to empower you”. It is a well known fact that Namal has a feeling of resentment towards his uncles Gotabhaya Rajapakse and Basil Rajapakse.

Fishers as pawns


Editorial-


There seems to be no end in sight to the burning issue of illegal fishing in the Palk Bay and the Gulf of Mannar. It has obviously got out of hand as the Tamil Nadu politicians are aggravating it.

Some experts are of the opinion that the arrest and prosecution of fishers who cross the International Maritime Boundary Line (IMBL) won’t help solve the problem. They have recommended a bilateral agreement between Sri Lanka and India in keeping with the International Plan of Action to Prevent and Eliminate Illegal Unreported and Unregulated Fishing, joint patrolling by the two countries and educating the fishermen of both countries on the consequences of crossing the IMBL illegally. They point out quoting the UN that ‘improvement in Monitoring Control and Surveillance (MCS) and their effective implementation in waters under national jurisdiction and in the high seas represent the best hope for preventing, deterring, and eliminating IUU Fishing’. Ideally, this is the course of action the two countries should adopt, but in reality, it is not possible to do so.

All attempts to pour oil on troubled waters having come a cropper Sri Lanka is now left with no alternative but to enforce the law regardless of the diplomatic fallout of such action. The Central government of India does not seem keen to go the whole hog to prevent Tamil Nadu fishermen from poaching in Sri Lankan waters because it is wary of antagonising Jayalalithaa, Karunanidhi et al encouraging illegal fishing. Most of the large trawlers that enter Sri Lankan waters belong to Tamil Nadu politicians, according to Fisheries Minister Dr. Rajitha Senaratne. The value of the fish illegally caught annually in Sri Lankan waters is said to be about one billion US dollars. This is a huge amount of money and the damage caused to the country’s fishing resources by illegal fishing methods cannot be estimated. Dr. Senaratne has also accused Tamil Nadu politicians of using fishers as pawns in a political game. According to him biggest culprits are the boat owners, many of whom were big politicians in Tamil Nadu and they are giving their vessels to fishermen on the condition that the latter poach in Sri Lankan waters.

Some of the multilateral issues such as illegal fishing and illegal migration continue to defy remedies because diplomacy has taken precedence over the law. Leniency doesn’t pay in addressing these problems. President Mahinda Rajapaksa has gone on record as saying, on several occasions, that fishermen are blind to IMBLs etc and go where the fish are. He is a former fisheries minister and his sympathy seems to be with fishers. But, such statements only embolden the poachers to do more of what they have been doing. Australia has realised that its liberal policies are counterproductive as regards the pressing need for stemming the influx of illegal migrants masquerading as refugees. Its new immigration laws which provide for transferring the asylum seekers to foreign territories and stern measures it has adopted with the help of Sri Lankan Navy are beginning to yield the intended results.

The theft of resources belonging to other countries is a punishable offence and it must be treated as such. Slant drilling is not permitted by oil producing nations and it was one of the reasons why Iraq invaded Kuwait triggering the Gulf War I. The theft of fish in the Palk Bay and the Gulf of Mannar should be similarly treated and the culprits dealt with according to the available laws. Both Sri Lanka and India must arrest and prosecute the fish thieves in their waters as there appears to be no other way out and desist from making diplomatic interventions to secure the release of the offenders. Fishermen must be made to realise that they are not ‘more equal’ than others and they cross the IMBL at their own risk.

India-Sri Lanka ties netted in fishermen poaching issue

Shanghai Daily,上海日报By Uditha Jayasinghe-Dec 16,2013
COLOMBO, Dec. 16 (Xinhua) -- Tension between Sri Lanka and India has spiraled as both sides arrest fishermen crossing into each other's maritime boundaries with arrests increasing to hundreds on both sides and triggering calls for diplomatic intervention.

Who Is That Girl In A New Bikini?

By Ravi Perera -December 17, 2013 
Ravi Perera
Ravi Perera
Colombo Telegraph“Pakistan is not alone in its powerlessness. South Asia as a whole is running on empty-insufficient investment, poor planning and corruption dog the regions power sector…. Each country’s factors are different: a massive unresponsive bureaucracy in India, a fast growing population in Bangladesh; war in Afghanistan; old technology in Nepal…” Time Magazine –October 2013
Although the above analysis is particularly in reference to the energy sector, it nevertheless holds good for most sectors of the South Asian economies. Their path towards development is scattered with daunting obstacles some of which like Capital shortages and deep-rooted systemic weaknesses seemingly insurmountable.
Anyone you speak to in Sri Lanka will tell you how important foreign investments are for the country. For decades now policy makers have been   uttering the mantra. Every government has offered various encouragements and incentives in order to attract them. But the truth is, in comparison to other comparable countries in the Asian region, our efforts have borne only modest results.
Obviously, any foreign investor will look at a country’s fundamentals in order to assess the security of his investment as well as the potential for better returns. Nobody likes to lose their money. Equally, if there is a possibility of a better return at home why venture into new and uncharted territories?
One vital form of foreign investments is by way stock markets and other securities like government bonds. Globally, the volume of foreign investments to the stock markets in newly emerging/developing   countries has increased exponentially in recent times. The “BRICS”, the acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa have attracted a major portion of these investments. Being relatively big markets they have the capacity to absorb Billions of dollars. Other large markets like Singapore, Hong Kong, Thailand, Dubai, Turkey, South Korea, Israel etc also receive huge inflows.
A few weeks back Sarath Amunugama, our debonair Deputy Finance Minister, declared in somewhat colourful terms that Sri Lanka could compete for investments in “our own bikini”. With an unerring   eye for beauty the Minister has judged that the right moment for the coming-out party on the beach is now.
Last year Morgan Stanley’s head of the Emerging Markets investments unit Ruchir Sharma  brought out a  book titled “Break Out Nations; In pursuit of the Next Economic Miracles” which attempts to guide investors in the developed world looking for superior returns by investing in such markets.
Sharma says that while in a Developed market the key is for the investor to pick the right industry sector, in emerging markets it is crucial that he finds the “best countries” to invest his money. And these may no longer be the “BRICS” which according to Sharma may be losing their competitive edge.
According to Ruchir Sharma, a potential investor in emerging markets should attempt to answer certain questions about the country before committing himself.
1) A foremost issue in assessing the potential of a country is the size of the economy that is owned or controlled by the State. State institutions by and large fare poorly in comparison to the private sector in terms of efficiency and allocation of resources. Both China and Russia are loaded with State owned enterprises, a reality bound to impact their future progress.                             Read More