Editorial-December 11, 2013,

An attempt by UNP MP Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe to submit a private member’s motion to Parliament calling for the adoption of the Latimar House principles governing the removal of judges, among other things, was thwarted yesterday. Now that President Mahinda Rajapaksa is the Commonwealth Chairman he cannot refuse to comply with the Latimar guidelines, MP Rajapakshe has told this newspaper. Both of them have the same surname, albeit differently spelt in English, and are from Giruwapattuwa, but Wijayadasa does not seem to know Mahinda! The Commonwealth will be lucky if, under President Rajapaksa’s stewardship, most of its member states don’t adopt Sri Lankan method of getting rid of judges!
The worst that can happen to a country’s supreme law is for the public to lose faith in it. This, we are afraid, has already happened here. The Democratic Socialist Republic—whatever that means—of Sri Lanka is badly in need of a new constitution. But, since the incumbent dispensation seems bent on retaining the existing one at any cost for obvious reasons, at least its seriously flawed provisions should be amended.
One cannot but agree with MP Rajapakshe that the process of removing judges needs urgent revision though the adoption by the government of the Latimar Principles has the same chance as an honest person succeeding in Sri Lankan politics. At present, as is common knowledge, judges including the Chief Justice could function with dignity free from harassment only if they don’t fall foul of the political authority.
Sri Lanka stands condemned internationally for political interference with the judiciary and the resultant erosion of judicial independence. This has to be ended not only to maintain the separation of powers but also to repair the country’s image.
The blame for this sorry state of affairs, however, should be apportioned to the judiciary as well. Some judges unflinchingly sell their souls to political devils at discount prices and willingly become pliable tools in the hands of powers that be. Having done so, a few of them suddenly take on their political masters when they fall from grace and even try to run parallel governments by usurping executive and legislative powers on the pretext of judicial activism. And they pit the judiciary against governments in the process.
Those in the political wilderness defend judicial independence not out of any love for judges. They take up the cudgels for judicial officers in trouble only to gain some political mileage. Once voted into office and ensconced in power, they ride roughshod over the judiciary and even try to impeach Chief Justices who refuse to toe their line. This has been the name of the game in Sri Lankan politics. That is why there must be strong constitutional safeguards in place to protect the judiciary against meddlesome politicians of all hues.
The current process of impeaching chief justices, we repeat, is seriously flawed and the constitutional provisions concerned need to be amended. Judicial independence cannot be safeguarded so long as the CJ is at the mercy of the head of state and/or the ruling party lawmakers most of whom are semi literate scumbags. Sadly, legislative kangaroo trials have come to pass for impeaching judges, and governments with steamroller majorities could get rid of chief justices according to their whims and fancies. Likewise, the constitutional flaws enable even the judges who commit impeachable offences to strike back and emerge heroes claiming to be victims of political witch hunts in case of being probed.
Interestingly, it was only the other day that an Opposition bigwig declared in Parliament that the Commonwealth was ‘a toothless hag’ not to be taken seriously. He was obviously trying to take the gloss off the recently-concluded CHOGM which the government has been flaunting as a rare achievement. But, today, one of his colleagues is asking the legislature to adopt that wizened hag’s principles! MP Rajapakshe’s attempt to project the judiciary should be commended and he deserves the backing from all those who cherish democracy, but the Opposition needs to be urged to desist from ridiculing the Commonwealth and calling for adopting its principles in the same breath.