Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Thursday, December 12, 2013

No Evidence To Prove Kili Maharaja Responsible For Sirasa Network Say His Lawyers

Colombo TelegraphDecember 12, 2013
The case filed by UNP MP Mangala Samaraweera in the Matara Magistrate’s Court against the Sirasa Media Network and its Chairman R. Rajamahendaran (aka Kili Maharaja) was dismissed yesterday, after the business tycoon’s lawyers said there was no evidence to prove he was the chairman of the broadcasting network.
RR 1Matara Additional Magistrate Manjula Karunaratne dismissed the case Samaraweera had filed under Section 81 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court had previously issued summons to Chairman of the Capital Maharaja Group, R. Rajamahendran to appear in the Matara Court on December 11.
However, when lawyers for Rajamahendran filed a motion saying he had not committed an offence, the Magistrate changed the order saying the MTV Chairman did not need to be in court.
Attorney for Rajamahendran President’s Counsel Rienzie Aresecularatne told Court yesterday when the matter came up that the petitioner had failed to name the respondents at the Sirasa Network. The attorney argued that Capital Maharaja Organization was a group of companies that engages in various businesses and while R. Rajamahendran is the Chairman, he is but one of 15 individuals.
Colombo Telegraph has in its possession letters authored by Rajamahendran in his capacity as Chairman, with regard to the Sirasa Media Network, which we publish here in the public interest.
Related posts;

WikiLeaks:Rajapaksa Managed To Influenced MTV Owner Maharaja

VIDEO: MINISTRY MUM ON NTC SPONSORED ‘RANSOM MAFIA’ - GEMUNU


VIDEO: Ministry mum on NTC sponsored ‘ransom mafia’ - Gemunu
 
December 12, 2013 
Ada DeranaThe Lanka Private Bus Owners’ Association says that the private bus industry in Sri Lanka will completely decline by the year 2020 and that the government is responsible for it. 

LPBOA Chairman Gemunu Wijeratne stated that private buses have seen a 20% decline in passengers in the past 5 years (2008-2013) and that if the decline continues in the next five years not only the private bus industry but all bus owners will be “wiped out”. 

He charged that the government is completely responsible for this situation and that justice has not been done for bus owners even in this year’s budget. 

We did not even see the fund allocated for the transport sector, he told reporters in Colombo today (12).

Wijeratne further said that they have informed the Ministry of Private Transport Services, in writing, regarding certain groups which are collecting “ransom” from private bus operators and that however they continue to remain silent on the matter. 

He said that certain individuals at bus stands collected nearly Rs 120 million from bus operators in the past couple of years and that today these “extortionists” are divided into several groups.  

The National Transport Commission has created several bus unions, which are extorting money from bus operator, he said. “I complained to the Defence Secretary regarding this and the Colombo Crimes Division recorded a statement from me,” he said.

Wijeratne stated that a ransom of around Rs 300 is collected everyday especially from Badulla-Colombo buses at the stand and at some places up to Rs 500 is charged by unions recognized by the NTC and formed by bus owners themselves. “That is the first ransom.”

The second ransom is collected by timekeepers at the bus stand, he said.

When the National Transport Commission sponsors the “ransom mafia” other individuals will also do the same, he said. “That is the truth.” 

“We don’t know where this money is going but we have informed the security forces regarding the matter,” he said, adding, that if anybody is collecting money at a bus halt or stand that is a ransom.

He claimed that around Rs 400,000 in “ransom” is collected on a daily basis by unions recognized by the National Transport Commission (NTC). 

SL minister Badurdeen splits Tamil speaking people in Mannaar

TamilNet[TamilNet, Thursday, 12 December 2013, 12:05 GMT]
Attempting to incite community hatred between various Tamil-speaking communities of Naanaaddaan, Rishard Badurdeen, the Industry and Commerce Minister of the occupying Sri Lanka, has again interfered in the civic affairs, sabotaging the efforts by the Bishop of Mannaar to resolve a land dispute in Pon-theevu-ka’ndal village, news sources in Mannaar said. The SL minister has played a crucial role in creating a conflict between the residents of the Muslim village of Poovarasang-ku’lam and Pon-theevu-ka’ndal where non-Muslim Tamils live. The SL Police and government officials are under the control of the controversial minister, who has been behind causing unrest between Catholics and Muslims in the district. 

Last year, when Badurdeen incited violence and went on record in SL parliament issuing a threatening statement against the Bishop of Mannaar, there were widespread protests against him in the North. 

Recently, the Divisional Secretary of Naanaaddaan, who was allegedly under the influence of Mr Badurdeen, went ahead with a plan to distribute lands to Muslims and non-Muslims in Pon-theevu-ka’ndal village. As some Muslim villagers from the nearby Poovarasang-ku’lam started to construct houses in Pon-theevu-ka’ndal on Monday, the villagers objected to the move. 

Following the episode, a meeting was held at Naanaaddaan Divisional Secretariat. When the divisional secretary was taking the side of SL minister Badurdeen, the protesting villagers of Pon-theevu-ka’ndal attacked the secretariat causing damage to the secretariat. The officials of the secretariat went on a protest, and the SL minister reportedly instructed the DS officials in Musali and Mannaar to join the boycott against the attack on Naanaaddaan divisional secretariat. 

Sri Lankan police arrested 65 villagers of Pon-theevu-ka’ndal, including women, on charges of attack against the Naanaaddaan secretariat. The arrested were sent to Anuradhapura remand prison. On Wednesday, the District Court of Mannaar ordered 18 of these to be detained till 18th December and granted bail to the remaining 47 on a surety of Rs 25,000 each. 

In the meantime, when Mannaar Bishop and the Catholic priests wanted the SL Government Agent M.Y.S. Deshapriya, to resolve the conflict, the SLGA, who is behind the Sinhalicisation of Mannaar, has told them that the people concerned should resolve the dispute at the Divisional Secretariat in Naanaaddaan.


PM's office issued release to exact revenge 

 PM's office issued release to exact revenge


By Gihan Nicholas- December 12, 2013
Keerthi Sri Weerasinghe, former Coordinating Secretary to Prime Minister D.M. Jayaratne, who recently resigned over his alleged involvement in a case where a shipment of concealed heroin had been imported to the country, said the release issued by the Prime Minister's office on Wednesday (11) stating that he had been removed from his post, was done to exact revenge.


Expressing his views to Ceylon Today, Weerasinghe said the release bearing the signature of Jayasuriya Udukumbura, who serves as the Media Secretary...
.to the Premier, was issued due to a personnel rift, and with the intention of tarnishing his reputation.
The release stated that Keerthi Sri Weerasinghe was in fact a Secretary at the Ministry of Buddha Sasana and not a Secretary at the Prime Minister's Office.


However, Weerasinghe had acted as a Coordinating Secretary of the Prime Minister of his private staff.
"I submitted my resignation to the Prime Minister on 9 December. I was told by the Prime Minister that I would be reinstated as soon as the investigation into this incident concludes. However, a release was issued by Udukumbura yesterday, who is the Media Secretary to the Prime Minister at the Ministry of Buddha Sasana and Religious Affairs, stating that I had been relieved from all the posts held by me at the Ministry of Buddha Sasana. This was solely done due to a personal grudge that this individual had harboured towards me. There is no logic in issuing a release as I had already tendered my resignation," Weeresinghe said.


He also told Ceylon Today that Udukumbura had been severely reprimanded by Prime Minister, D.M. Jayaratne, for issuing the release.
Meanwhile, when contacted, Udukumbura defended his decision in sending the media release stating that he, in his capacity as Media Coordinator, took it upon himself to issue the media release as he had deemed that it was his duty to do so.


"As the Media Secretary to the Ministry of Religious Affairs and Buddha Sasana, I thought it was my duty to demystify this situation. Hence, I issued the release," he said.
Weerasinghe, meanwhile, said he had issued the controversial letter to Tharanga Vitachchi, the Gampola UPFA Town Councillor, who had requested it with the pure intention of assisting a fellow party member.


"I issued the letter to Tharanga Vitachchi as he requested the same as a favour. It is our duty to help each other as members of the same Party. The Prime Minister, as well as Tharanga Vitachchi and I, were all duped by the Pakistani businessman. We are in no way involved in this. The Prime Minister is a good Buddhist. He would never do such things," Weerasinghe added.


Meanwhile, Gampola UPFA Town Councillor, Tharanga Vitachchi, when contacted reiterated the sentiments of Weerasinghe, stating that they had been deceived by the Pakistani businessman who he had introduced to Weerasinghe while they were in Kuwait.
However, the Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU), a main constituent of the government, had demanded the resignation of the Prime Minister, while the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), is seeking a special parliamentary debate in this regard.

Sri Lanka: Call for anti- women minister of women's afairs and child development to resign

Minister with the first lady

Thursday, December 12, 2013

SRI LANKA BRIEFSTATEMENT CALLING FOR RESIGNATION, THE MINISTER OF WOMEN’S AFFAIRS AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT: MR. TISSA KARALLIYADDE
 Mr. Tissa Karalliyadde has on several occasions made extremely sexist remarks that are humiliating to Sri Lankan women in general, without any sense of responsibility for the cabinet office he holds as Minister of Women’s Affairs and Child Development. He has stated on several public platforms that women should not be appointed to responsible positions of public office because by nature they are unable to get on with each other and constantly fight and slander other women.

Where is Palestine’s Mandela?

Alan Hart

Alan Hart

Marwan-BarghoutiThe answer to my headline question is that he, Marwan Barghouti, is in an Israeli jail where he has been since his arrest in Ramallah by an IDF unit in 2002, after which, in 2004, he was sentenced to five life terms in prison. Some months before his arrest one of Israel’s security agencies tried and failed to assassinate him. A missile was fired at his bodyguard’s car and killed the bodyguard. (If the attempt on Barghouti’s life had succeeded, his killers would not have been brought to justice because as well as bulldozing Palestinian homes and stealing Palestinian land and water, Israel kills, murders, with impunity).

Ukraine leader intends to sign EU deal, diplomat says

By Marie-Louise Gumuchian and Diana Magnay, CNN-December 12, 2013
CNN
(CNN) — Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych intends to sign a deal on closer European Union ties, the bloc’s top diplomat has said, after weeks of mass protests that have rattled the Eastern European country.
Ukrainian protesters, angry about the government’s decision last month to spurn a free-trade agreement with the EU in favor of closer economic ties with Moscow, have stood their ground in Kiev’s Independence Square, or Maidan, paralyzing the center of the capital.
They have remained there, undeterred by authorities’ overnight crackdown early Wednesday in which police tore down barricades they had set up.
After meeting Yanukovych this week, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said he had assured her of his intent.
"He indicated he still wishes to sign the Association Agreement with the European Union," she told CNN in Kiev on Wednesday.
"From our perspective, we think that’s good for this country. But the present crisis that’s happening right now needs to be resolved."
A statement from the EU in Brussels, Belgium, on Thursday quoting Ashton echoed this: “The President has assured me when I’ve met him that he does intend to sign the Association Agreement.”
Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Serhiy Arbuzov traveled to Brussels on Thursday,where he met Stefan Fule, European commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy, an EU spokesman in Kiev said.
In Moscow, Russian President Vladimir Putin briefly touched on the situation in the Ukraine in his State of the Nation address to the Federal Assembly on Thursday.
"I very much hope that all political forces of the country will manage to come to an agreement in the interest of the Ukrainian people and solve all the piles of problems," he said.
Opposition dismisses talks
Pressed by Europe and the United States, Yanukovych on Wednesday offered to meet opposition leaders to find a way out of a crisis that blew up last month when thousands poured into the streets of the capital, demanding his resignation.
"I invite representatives of all political forces, priests, public figures to hold the nationwide dialogue," he said in a statement on the official presidency website.
The statement also called on the opposition not to “choose the path of confrontation and ultimatums.”
However, opposition leaders have dismissed the offer of talks, insisting that Yanukovych must quit for favoring ties with Russia over the EU.
In a statement on her website, Yanukovych’s jailed chief political opponent, Yulia Tymoshenko, urged Ukrainians to “stand up,” and she repeated previous opposition calls for early elections.
U.S. ‘disgust’ at crackdown
Kiev’s handling of the pro-EU protests has been met with stern responses from the European Union and United States.
Police moved into the main protest camp early Wednesday, using chainsaws to tear down the barriers, which had been manned by pro-Western demonstrators. Clashes led to reports of injuries on both sides.
"The United States expresses its disgust with the decision of Ukrainian authorities to meet the peaceful protest in … Maidan Square with riot police, bulldozers, and batons, rather than with respect for democratic rights and human dignity," U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said in a prepared statement.
"This response is neither acceptable, nor does it befit a democracy."
In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters Wednesday that “all options” were under consideration in Ukraine, including sanctions.
UK Foreign Secretary William Hague said he was “deeply concerned” about the Ukraine government’s decision to send in riot police against peaceful protesters.
Thousands of demonstrators have been camped out for days in Independence Square. They also continue to occupy Kiev’s City Hall.
The scenes of protest are reminiscent of the uprising that swept Yanukovych from office as prime minister nine years ago during the Orange Revolution.
East vs. West
Ukraine is split between pro-European regions in the west of the country and a more Russia-oriented east.
Protesters say an EU agreement would open borders to trade and set the stage for modernization and inclusion. They accuse Yanukovych of preparing to take the country into a Moscow-led customs union.
Moscow has leverage that may have affected Yanukovych’s decision last month to backpedal on the EU talks because Russia supplies Ukraine with natural gas.
The EU is also pressuring Yanukovych to free Tymoshenko, who has languished in jail for two years after being convicted of abuse of power in 2011. The EU and other critics decried the verdict as a sham.
The Orange Revolution that swept Yanukovych from office in 2004 also brought the pro-Western Tymoshenko to power.
At the rallies in Independence Square, protesters have carried her picture.

From Mutur To Geneva

By Tisaranee Gunasekara -December 12, 2013 
“Do we really have to pass through every sort of horror before we can open our eyes?” - Tim Parks (Hell and 
Back: Selected Essays)
Colombo TelegraphThe Permanent Peoples Tribunal (PPT) is the successor to the Russell Tribunal which investigated American war crimes in Vietnam. Set up in 1979[i], its aim is to “make up for the moral and political shortcomings of states as instruments for the achievement of justice”[ii].
Last week, at the end of its second session on the Lankan war, the PPT concluded that Colombo is guilty of ‘crimes of genocide’ against the Tamils and that ‘both the United States of America and United Kingdom were complicit in the genocide while the involvement of India warranted further investigation’[iii].
A member of the French aid group Action Contre La Faim places a wreath in front of the photographs of his 17 slain colleagues at their memorial in Batticaloa, Sri Lanka on August 11, 2006
A member of the French aid group Action Contre La Faim places a wreath in front of the photographs of his 17 slain colleagues at their memorial in Batticaloa, Sri Lanka on August 11, 2006
According to the Rajapaksa version, the Fourth Eelam War was fought – and won – as an autarkic enterprise, with some help from a handful of non-Western allies. In reality, the Rajapaksa regime defeated the LTTE thanks partly to an enabling international environment created by the LTTE.
In the early, heady months of the Third Peace Process, most of the world was the Tiger’s oyster. The LTTE was welcomed and treated as an unofficial government in many of the world’s capitals. Had Vellupillai Pirapaharan been a little less maximalist, and a little more intelligent, he could have won a federal or even a confederal deal for the Tamils.
But moderation was viscerally alien to Mr. Pirapaharan. He wanted his own state and he wanted to win it on the battlefield. Consequently, the Tiger did not really change its ways and act in accordance with internationally accepted norms during the peace process; it only pretended to do so. Behind a façade of moderation, the LTTE continued to prepare for the next war, conscripting children, murdering political opponents and extorting money (even in Western capitals).
For a long time, despite concerted efforts by national and international human rights organisations (the UTHR, the Amnesty International and the Human Rights Watch) to expose Tiger crimes, the West opted to give the LTTE the benefit of the doubt[iv]. And the Tigers believed – wrongly – that denials, promises and pretences would suffice to satisfy the world.                                    Read More  

The Secret History of How Cuba Helped End Apartheid in South Africa

Democracy Now!

Democracy Now! - New York, NY
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2013
As the world focuses on Tuesday’s historic handshake between President Obama and Cuban President Raúl Castro, we look back at the pivotal role Cuba played in ending apartheid and why Castro was one of only five world leaders invited to speak at Nelson Mandela’s memorial. In the words of Mandela, the Cubans'destroyed the myth of the invincibility of the white oppressor ... [and] inspired the fighting masses of South Africa.' Historian Piero Gleijeses argues that it was Cuba’s victory in Angola in 1988 that forced Pretoria to set Namibia free and helped break the back of apartheid South Africa. We speak to Gleijeses about his new book, "Visions of Freedom: Havana, Washington, Pretoria, and the Struggle for Southern Africa, 1976-1991," and play archival footage of Mandela meeting Fidel Castro in Cuba.

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Sri Lanka’s crumbling democracy



East Asia ForumAuthor: Taylor Dibbert, Washington, DC-December 7th, 2013
It is disappointing that Sri Lanka, a country with such a serious democratic deficit, is chairing the Commonwealth for the next two years. All signs indicate Sri Lanka is descending into authoritarianism, and much work is needed if Sri Lankan democracy is to be saved.
Given Sri Lanka’s chairmanship, it is not clear what the values and principles of the Commonwealth actually are. At November’s Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Colombo, many heads of state chose not to attend.Mauritius has even given up its right to host CHOGM in 2015, and the event is now slated to be held in Malta. Of those who did participate, British Prime Minister David Cameronmade the most noise.
Sri Lanka continues to face a human rights crisis of epic proportions. The continued erosion of the rule of law, impunity, the government’s blatant unwillingness to implement the most meaningful recommendations from the final report of its own reconciliation commission (the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission), and the recent unconstitutional impeachment of the chief justice underscore this. Sri Lanka is no longer a semi-democratic country — it is a dying ‘democracy on life-support’.
The Sri Lankan government chose to hold CHOGM in Colombo, principally because of the prestige associated with the event and desire to show the world that Sri Lanka has moved on from three decades of brutal war.
The event, however, did not go that smoothly. The regime consistently limited access for international journalists, especially to the North, and revealed its deep unease with being questioned. With the way CHOGM was handled, the current regime has yet again reminded domestic and international observers that it is far from untouchable. That being said, the regime remains the only game in town.
Many countries — including India, China, the United States and Japan — are currently vying for influence on the island. But the reality is that the international community’s ability to shape events in Sri Lanka remains limited. Not helping this are Sri Lanka’s mainstream media, which consistently fails to report the news in any meaningful way. The harsh repression of dissent has resulted in significant self-censorship. A deeply fragmented opposition is also an issue.
India has long had a very understandable interest in the way things play out on the island. China’s interest is more recent and includes geopolitical and economic concerns. But it is the American case that is especially intriguing. Washington appears to be using Sri Lanka as a test case, perhaps to see how effective similar interventions, international pressure and the concomitant use of venues like the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) — where two resolutions critical of the government’s actions have already been passed — can actually be. Aside from speaking more generally about human rights and democratic reforms, Washington is pressuring the regime to implement the recommendations emanating from the LLRC. Though bilateral ties are also very important, Washington has used the HRC as a platform to rally international support for these issues.
Washington is quite open that another resolution will be floated at the HRC in March 2014, and it is likely that such a resolution will pass. But will the resolution be ‘strong’, and include a provision for an independent international investigation into wartime atrocities and/or an international mechanism to monitor ongoing developments on the island? And — more importantly — would a strong resolution on Sri Lanka at the HRC be effective? Would it compel the regime in Colombo to modify its behaviour, respect human rights, the rule of law and promote democratic values?
Another coming measurement of Sri Lanka’s democratic condition will be in the next parliamentary and presidential elections, which could come as soon as early 2014.  While the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) has recently been effective in voicing the concerns of Tamil people and speaking more generally about the erosion of democracy in the country, the TNA will never be able to capture a huge swath of the mostly Sinhalese electorate. The trick for the TNA will be to build an alliance with one of the larger Sinhalese parties — in this case, the United National Party (UNP).
When it comes to democracy and human rights in Sri Lanka the signs are, quite evidently, not promising. Unfortunately, it looks like things will get worse before they get better.
Taylor Dibbert is an international consultant based in Washington, DC.

Dalai Lama To Miss Nelson Mandela Memorial In South Africa (VIDEO)

The Huffington Post12/09/13 05:35 AM ET EST AP
NEW DELHI (AP) — A spokesman says the Dalai Lama will not attend memorial services for fellow Nobel Peace Prize laureate Nelson Mandela in South Africa, where the Buddhist spiritual leader has twice been unable to obtain a visa.
Tenzin Takhla gave no reason Monday for the Dalai Lama's missing a memorial service in Johannesburg and funeral in Mandela's hometown.
Takhla said only that "logistically it's impossible at this time."
South Africa blocked the Dalai Lama from attending a Nobel laureates' peace conference in 2009, and stalled on a 2011 visa until the Tibetan leader withdrew the application.
The Dalai Lama has been based in the Indian hill town of Dharamsala since fleeing from China in 1959. He seeks more autonomy for Tibet, but China accuses him of being a separatist.

Sri Lanka State Media Calls Mandela An Appeaser, Rubbishes TRC As A Sham As MR Attends Memorial Service

December 12, 2013 
Amid the Government declaring two days of mourning for South African liberation icon and former PresidentNelson Mandela and President Mahinda Rajapaksa‘s attendance at the Johannesburg memorial service, the Government controlled press has referred to him as an appeaser of the whites and says the claims have more than a smidgen of truth.
Rajpal Abeynayake
Rajpal Abeynayake
Colombo TelegraphDaily News Editor Rajpal Abeynayake in his editorial on December 9 said some people in South Africa certainly do not entertain the same view about Mandela that most people outside do.
“They feel that he sold out the anti-apartheid cause, and replaced social apartheid with a form of economic apartheid, as he did not agitate for the return of the farms that had been established by whites in land that had been stolen from black South Africans,” the editorial said.
The state media editorial also goes on to say that these claimants also feel that he sold out the blacks as he, through the so called reconciliation process, gave a blanket reprieve for whites to get away with their apartheid era crimes and with the ‘booty’ — the land that they acquired in the process of so called settler-colonization.
“They also say that Mandela probably cut a deal with the white South African apartheid regime, to be gentle with the white South Africans in exchange for their being able to keep the lands, and not having to pay for their crimes,” it read.
“There is no doubt more than a smidgen of truth to some of these allegations. But, the fact remains also that Mr. Mandela perhaps could not have done any better,” the editor says.
Meanwhile in an editorial on December 10, Abeynayake calls the much hailed South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission nothing but a sham to appease White perpetrators of apartheid because they ran the economy. “In South Africa it was the whites they wanted to please, in Sri Lanka it is the diaspora LTTE rump that is targeted for pacification. In South Africa there was good reason to appease the white perpetrators of apartheid; after all they ran the economy and therefore it was a matter of practicality as well. In Sri Lanka with no such considerations can’t we please get past this pantomime of pseudo-reconciliation and get to the task of nation building which had been on inordinate, extended hold?” Abeynayake asks in his December 10 editorial.
Abeynayake said the TRC was a result of Mandela being forced to appease many forces. “The Western led governments no doubt helped him with sanctions against the apartheid regime and obviously those came at a price. In short, at their behest, the ANC leader came up with the TRC as a means of a smooth transition in which there was no damage done to white people’s reputations, or their property or selves,” the editorial reads.
So it was in that sense not ‘truth and reconciliation’ that took place, it was the exact opposite; the papering-over of the truth and pragmatic, almost cynical accommodation, mainly because the loser in the confrontation in South Africa over apartheid, was somehow curiously also the stronger partner in many ways in the South African ‘rainbow’ state that ensued, the Daily News said in its Tuesday editorial.

Sri Lanka guilty of genocide against Tamils with UK, US complicity: PPT rules


BY RAMANAN VEERASINGHAM-11 DECEMBER 2013

In a landmark judgement that sends shocking waves to many international busy bodies, a very eminent panel of international judges of the Rome-based Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal (PPT) Tuesday unanimously ruled “Sri Lanka guilty of the crime of genocide against the Eelam Tamil people”, while the US and UK were found to be guilty of complicity to this crime, a PPT statement said Tuesday.
A 11-member high-profile judges, consisting of experts in genocide studies, former UN officials, experts in international law and renowned peace and human rights activists, gave this ruling after a two-day tribunal hearing between December 7 and10 in Bremen, Germany.
IDPs urge TNA to reclaim their appropriated land
10 December 2013
Displaced Tamils vented their anger at the leader of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), R. Sampanthan, on Monday, whilst he was visiting the Kattai Parichchan IDP camp near Sampoor.
Calling on the their political representation to act, the people said,
We are ready to die to recover Sampoor... reclaim the places that we were born in. We are ready to starve ourselves to death in order to reclaim our taken land
Thousands of people from East Sampoor were displaced in 2006 and have been settled in IDP camps for over 3 years. Of the ones that have been settled into homes, none have been resettled back to their original places of birth and residence.
The IDPs of Samboor recently staged protests during the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in attempts to raise further awareness of the Sri Lankan government's appropriation of their land.
The sharp words from the displaced Tamils to the TNA leader, echo the visible anger displayed when Sampanthan drove by Tamil protesters during the CHOGM and a wider gulf between the demands of the Tamil people, including  Tamil politicians popular with the people, and the rhetoric of the TNA leadership.
See related articles:
Sell out Sam (04 Dec 2013)
"Is this what we voted for" asks Jaffna newspaper (06 Oct 2013)

See also our TG view - Representing 'extremism' and our editorial - Vote for liberation.
NPC passes resolution to oust Governor 
NPC passes resolution to oust Governor
By Ananth Palakidnar-December 11, 2013
 
 
The Northern Provincial Council (NPC) has unanimously passed a resolution yesterday, urging President Mahinda Rajapaksa to remove Maj. Gen. G.A. Chandrasiri from the post of Northern Governor, and appoint a new Governor with no military background.
 
 
The resolution was brought by former Parliamentarian and NPC Councillor, M.K. Sivajilingam, and was seconded by Councillor, K. Sarveswaran. Although the resolution was passed unanimously, the Opposition members pointed out that when selecting a new Governor with no military background, it should be done on a national basis, instead of demanding the appointment of a person of Tamil or Northern origin.
 
 
Another resolution was also passed unanimously at the NPC calling for the withdrawal of the Security Forces from the North. The NPC meeting took place without the participation of NPC Opposition Leader, Kandaswamy Kamalendran, who was under arrest by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) for his alleged involvement in the killing of Delft Pradeshiya Sabha Chairman, Daniel Rexian, on 26 November.
Meanwhile, NPC Chief Minister, C.V. Wigneswaran, also presented the first budget of the NPC yesterday.

Could The GDP Figures Be Bogus?

By Hema Senanayake - December 11, 2013
Hema Senanayake
Hema Senanayake
Colombo TelegraphGDP (Gross Domestic Production) is the most common measure of all “goods and services” produced in a country. Since GDP corresponds to the goods and services produced, in general, this figure corresponds to the annually increased wellbeing of the people the country or in any province.
Hence politicians usually quote the percentage of GDP growth to prove the increased wellbeing of citizens. TNA Parliamentarian Sumanthiran said in the parliament that Minister of Foreign Affairs Prof. G.L. Peiris, in a recent visit to the U.S. had submitted that the North Province was recovering. In order to justify his argument he had submitted that GDP growth in the Northern Province was over 25%. Further, Sumanthiran openly claimed in the parliament that G.L. Peiris had to retract it later. Why? I do not know. But I know that the United States has a norm in negotiating with foreign countries; that principle or the norm is, “we trust, but verify.” Perhaps, application of this principle by U.S. officials might have led the Minister of Foreign Affairs to retract from his original submission.
Pointing this incident out, Sumanthiran claims that GDP figures are bogus in Sri Lanka. But he did not mean that the calculation of GDP itself is wrong but I guess he claims that GDP growth figures are not corresponding to the increased wellbeing of people; in that sense GDP figures are bogus. Can this be happened? I think Prof. G.L. Peiris knows the answer better than anybody. My answer to the question is “Yes.” Today let us investigate about it in brief.
What the government is supposed to be doing economically? The short answer is that the job of the government is to produce what is known as “common interests” for the wellbeing of the members of the society. What are the most common “common interests”? Some of those are general administration, maintenance of law and order, general health care, education, taking care of poor and those who are unable to work, infrastructure development, research and development, etc. These “common interests” or services are not sold. In economics what is not sold to generate profit is considered as consumption. Hence, in general, these ‘common interests’ falls into the category of consumption not into the category investment.
In a previous article, I pointed out that the wellbeing of citizens is depended upon the consumption of “consumable output.” Since the production of common interests falls into the category of consumption, any production of common interests must increase the wellbeing of citizens. For example, a long ago the government decided to spend money for free general education and that increased the wellbeing of the people in general. Therefore, the production of these services must be accounted in Gross Domestic Production (GDP). Being true to our logic, the production of “common interests” is duly accounted in GDP.
However, due to the calculation procedure of GDP, sometimes there are chances to record the production of “common interests” without producing such services at all. TNA Parliamentarian Sumanthiran says that mostly this is the case with the present government not only in the Northern Province but in the whole country itself. He expressed this sentiment in two of his speeches during the budget debate. What is the effect of such a situation? In such a situation, the GDP is nominally increased but the wellbeing of the people is not increased. In order to understand this dilemma, let us briefly revisit the calculation of GDP. It is easy to understand.