Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, May 25, 2013

Abu Nusaybah, 'Friend' Of London Attack Suspect Michael Adebolajo, Arrested After BBC Interview

By SYLVIA HUI 05/25/13 12:59 PM ET EDT APThe Huffington Post

LONDON — Counterterrorism police on Saturday questioned a friend of alleged Islamic extremist Michael Adebolajo, one of two suspects in a savage killing of a British soldier on a London street that has horrified the country.
The friend, Abu Nusaybah, was arrested immediately after he gave a BBC Television interview Friday describing how Adebolajo may have become radicalized in Kenya and alleging that Britain's security services tried to recruit him six months ago. Police said Nusaybah was wanted on suspicion of involvement in unspecified acts of terrorism.
Adebolajo, 28, and Michael Adebowale, 22, are suspected of killing soldier Lee Rigby by hacking his body with knives and a meat cleaver in front of dozens of passersby Wednesday in the southeast London district of Woolwich. The horrific scene was recorded on witnesses' cellphones, and a video has emerged showing one of the two suspects making political statements and warning of more violence as the soldier lay on the ground.
Police shot both men as they arrived minutes after Rigby's slaying. Both suspects remain under armed guard at two London hospitals.
The attack has sparked fears of anti-Muslim sentiments in Britain. Police on Saturday arrested three people on suspicion of posting racist comments on Twitter ahead of a march organized by the far-right group English Defense League in the northern city of Newcastle. Police said some 1,500 people took part in the march.
The group, which has clashed violently with police in the past, has used Rigby's murder to criticize the British government for not paying enough attention to radical Islam in the country. About 350 people staged a counter-demonstration.
Faith Matters, a charity campaigning against extremism, said its helpline has received 162 calls since Rigby was killed from people reporting anti-Muslim incidents including attacks against mosques.
Questions abound over what could have led the two men to attack Rigby, a 25-year-old ceremonial military drummer and machine-gunner who had served in Afghanistan and was off duty when he was walking near his barracks. Nusaybah's interview offered one possible narrative. He said Adebolajo's behavior changed after he allegedly suffered abuse at the hands of Kenyan security forces.
Nusaybah said Adebolajo became withdrawn after he was allegedly arrested and then abused both physically and sexually while in jail.
"Although that change wasn't necessarily one that became overt, aggressive or anything like that, he became ... less talkative. He wasn't his bubbly self," Nusaybah told the BBC.
He claimed that agents from Britain's domestic spy agency, MI5, approached Adebolajo after he returned to Britain and initially asked him if he had met specific Muslim militants, then asked Adebolajo if he was willing to act as an informer.
"He was explicit in that he refused to work for them," Nusaybah said.
The BBC said police arrested Nusaybah outside its studios Friday night immediately after recording the interview.
"This interviewee had important background information that sheds light on this horrific event," the BBC said in a statement. "And when we asked him to appear and interviewed him, we were not aware he was wanted for questioning by the police."
London police confirmed that a 31-year-old man was arrested Friday night on suspicion of "the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism." Police declined to identify Nusaybah by name or provide further detail.
It was not immediately possible to verify the information provided by Nusaybah, who said he had known Adebolajo for about a decade. MI5 does not publicly discuss its efforts to recruit informers.
It is not uncommon, however, for special services officers to occasionally visit communities to ask people if they know potential terror suspects or others under MI5 surveillance.
Potential informants go through a screening process to determine if they should be trusted, what their motivation might be and whether their information would be likely to be accurate.
Nusaybah said Adebolajo was converted to Islam around 2004. His account corroborates those provided by two Muslim hard-liners who said they also knew Adebolajo.
Anjem Choudary, a former leader of a banned British radical group called al-Muhajiroun, said Adebolajo was a Christian who converted to Islam around 2003. Choudary told The Associated Press that Adebolajo participated in several of the group's London demonstrations before Britain outlawed the group in 2010.
Omar Bakri Muhammad, another former al-Muhajiroun leader and radical Muslim preacher, said Adebolajo is a Nigerian who was born and raised in Britain. He said that Adebolajo attended his London lectures in the early 2000s, but added that he had not stayed in touch with the suspect since then. Muhammad fled London and resettled in Lebanon in 2005 after suicide attacks on London's public transit system killed 56 people, including four bombers.
"I don't know what Michael did since 2004 or 2005," Bakri told the AP. "Two years ago he stopped attending our open lectures and lessons as well as our activities."
The University of Greenwich confirmed Saturday that records show Adebolajo was registered as a student there between 2003 and 2005. His academic progress was unsatisfactory and he did not complete his studies there, vice chancellor David Maguire said. The university did not have records for the second suspect, Adebowale.
University officials are investigating whether there was any evidence of extremism on its campus, Maguire added.
Police have not officially named the two suspects – officials in Britain usually wait to name suspects until charges have been filed. The AP has received confirmation of the identity of Adebowale from a British official speaking on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to disclose the information.
Few details have emerged about Adebowale besides one reported brush with death as a teenager.
The Guardian reported Saturday that Adebowale was stabbed in 2008, when a man attacked him and two friends in a London apartment. One 18-year-old friend died and the attacker received a life sentence for murder, the newspaper said.
Both suspects had been known to Britain's security services as part of previous terrorism investigations. Authorities said they have arrested three others, a man and two women, on suspicion of conspiracy to murder, but it is not yet clear whether the killing was part of any larger plot. The man remains in custody and the two women have been released without charge.
MI5 Director-General Andrew Parker is expected to deliver a preliminary report next week to Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee detailing what the agency knew about both suspects and whether MI5 could have done anything to stop the attack.
The directors of Britain's foreign spy agency, MI6, and Britain's eavesdropping agency, GCHQ, also are expected to give reports on what intelligence they had on the two men.

Come Clean: Groups Demand Transparency from Attorney General Eric Holder

by Josh Stearns-Saturday, May 25, 2013
CommonDreams.orgA day after President Obama ordered Attorney General Eric Holder to review the Justice Department’s guidelines regarding interactions with the press, Free Press and a diverse coalition of civil liberties, digital rights and open government groups weighed in on the agency’s treatment of journalists’ sources and information.
Representing millions of Americans, 62 groups signed the letter, demanding a full, transparent account of the Justice Department’s targeting of journalists and whistleblowers. The letter and full list of signers follow below.
Among the signers were the American Civil Liberties Union, the American Library Association, the Communications Workers of America, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Society of Professional Journalists, the Sunlight Foundation and the Writers Guild of America East.
The letter asserts that the Justice Department’s actions are not just a threat to press freedom, but to a healthy democracy. “The Obama administration promised a new era of openness and transparency,” the letter reads. “Your actions, which expand secrecy and intimidate those trying to shed more light on our government, run counter to that promise.”
The events of the past two weeks show why we need to engage the broader public in meaningful debate about the First Amendment and press freedom. Journalists can’t win this fight on their own — and they shouldn’t have to, especially since there are now so many media makers operating outside of traditional newsrooms.
This was a key point in the letter: “Threats to press freedom threaten anyone who seeks to share information about official actions using a cellphone, social media service or website.”
To that end, Free Press also delivered more than 16,000 petition signatures urging the Justice Department to protect press freedom. “The Justice Department’s abuse of press freedom is appalling, and the consequences could be far-reaching,” said Free Press President and CEO Craig Aaron. “The broad range of groups speaking out today signals the beginning of a broader popular movement defending press freedom.”
As the Justice Department begins its review, it should adopt a transparent approach that engages this larger movement and the public.
Read the full text of the letter and the list of signers below:
May 24, 2013
Attorney General Eric Holder
Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, D.C. 20530
Dear Sirs:
More than 50 journalism and press organizations recently wrote you to voice grave concerns about the Justice Department’s subpoena of telephone records belonging to Associated Press reporters and editors. We write today as a coalition of civil rights, public interest, transparency and media reform groups to express similar concerns.
Your actions have threatened press freedom — and endangered the health of our democracy. As groups working to strengthen democratic institutions and foster more open government, we are deeply concerned that your agency’s actions will hinder efforts to make government more transparent and accountable to the public.
Following years of aggressive leak investigations, the Justice Department’s overreaching subpoena of AP phone records sets a dangerous precedent. Furthermore, it appears to violate the Department’s own rules and guidelines. The impact of the Justice Department’s actions is already being felt. AP CEO Gary Pruitt reports that sources are now less willing to talk to reporters. And journalists from newsrooms large and small have noted the chilling effects on their coverage of the government.
The latest news suggests that the subpoenas were even broader than initially reported. In addition, details are emerging about a case in which the Justice Department also seized phone records from reporters at Fox News and labeled one of its journalists a “co-conspirator” for simply doing his job.
These troubling developments raise real questions about the scope of the Department’s surveillance of journalists. At a recent congressional hearing, Mr. Holder, you couldn’t recall how many times the Justice Department has subpoenaed journalists’ records. We need to know the full extent of your Department’s crackdown against journalists.
In the digital age, reporting is no longer confined to America’s traditional newsrooms. As such, threats to press freedom threaten anyone who seeks to share information about official actions using a cellphone, social media service or website. The Obama administration promised a new era of openness and transparency. Your actions, which expand secrecy and intimidate those trying to shed more light on our government, run counter to that promise.
We demand a full accounting of the Justice Department’s targeting of journalists and whistleblowers. We need this information so that we can advocate for appropriate action to protect everyone’s constitutional rights and push for stronger legal standards to protect all types of information gathering and sharing.
The Justice Department must explain its overreach in this matter. Furthermore, we call on the Department to stop violating its existing rules and cease targeting of individuals and organizations reporting on government activity.
Sincerely,
ACCESS
Alliance for Women in Media
American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression
American Civil Liberties Union
American Library Association
The Banyan Project
Brave New Films
Center for Democracy and Technology
ColorOfChange.org
The Committee to Protect Journalists
Common Cause
Communications Workers of America
CREDO Action
CultureStrike
Defending Dissent Foundation
Digital Media Law Project
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting
Freedom of the Press Foundation
Georgia First Amendment Foundation
IndyMedia
Investigative News Network
iSolon.org
Katy's Exposure Blog
Knowledge Ecology International
LAMP: Learning About Multimedia Project
Media Alliance
The Media Consortium
Media Mobilizing Project
Mine Safety and Health News
MuckRock
National Alliance for Media Arts and Culture
National Association of Black Journalists
National Coalition Against Censorship
National Federation of Community Broadcasters
National Freedom of Information Coalition
National Hispanic Media Coalition
National Priorities Project
Native Public Media
The Newspaper Guild-CWA
OpenTheGovernment.org
Park Center for Independent Media
Participatory Politics Foundation
PEN American Center
Personal Democracy Media
Project Censored
Project On Government Oversight
Prometheus Radio Project
Public Record Media
RootsAction.org
Society of Professional Journalists
Sunlight Foundation
Tully Center for Free Speech at Syracuse University
United Republic
TheUptake.org
Utah Foundation for Open Government
Washington Civil Rights Council
Women In Media & News
Women, Action & the Media
Women's Media Center
WRFN, Radio Free Nashville
Writers Guild of America, East

True Democracy can only be achieved by unity of all- Vijitha Herath

Saturday, 25 May 2013
on the 19th of May 2013, a conference was held at Vale farm Sports centre in Sudbury ; Harrow , Middlesex. The event was organized by the J.V.P committee of the U.K to discuss present situation of democracy in Sri Lanka.
Vijitha Herath, a J.V.P polity bureau member and a member of Sri Lankan parliament, was the main speaker. Many Sri Lankans attended this successful event, each from different backgrounds and ethnicities.
During the conference, M.P Vijitha Herath emphasized the importance of safe-guarding democracy in Sri Lanka .
After 30 years of a blood-shed civil war, the government had a golden opportunity to rebuild the country and also, more importantly to re-erect the unity among the Singhalese, Tamil and Muslim people of Sri Lanka . However, the government missed this opportunity. After 4 years, effects of the war still go on, people who were displaced from their homes still live in shelters without even ground facilities despite this the government spent huge amounts of money to celebrate the victory of the civil war.
In spite of everything so far, the government chooses to ignore the industries that could easily be improved, instead they decide to borrow huge loans from the International Monitory Fund (IMF), China and India all with dreadful conditions. They use those loans to exhibit the countries prosperity, by boasting a collection of new harbours, highways and air ports endangering the people to enormous debt.
MP Vijitha Herath invited all Sri Lankan expatriates to unite under the J.V.P banner to bring unity, harmony and prosperity to Sri Lanka.
Photos: Chathura Vimukthi

Perahera elephant on rampage

SATURDAY, 25 MAY 2013
At least 24 persons were injured when an elephant went on rampage during a Perahera of  the Muthiyangana Temple last night, police said.

Most of the injured persons including some children participating in it received minor injuries and were admitted to the hospital.

Last week six children were injured when an elephant went on rampage during a Perahera of the Kandana temple in the Ganemulla junction on the Colombo – Kandy Road.
Ban cattle slaughter immediately – Wimal to President
May 25, 2013  
Leader of the National Freedom Front (NFF) Wimal Weerawansa today requested the President to immediately ban the slaughtering of cattle within the country.

In the wake of a Buddhist monk setting himself on fire yesterday to protest against the slaughter of cattle for meet, the Minister has written to President Mahinda Rajapaksa saying measures should be taken based on that incident. 

The Minister of Construction, Engineering Services, Housing and Common Amenities further points out that the majority of the country’s Buddhist and Hindu people reject cattle slaughtering with disgust and that only a small group in Sri Lankan society approves of it. 

He stated that in India, which has a majority of Hindu devotee, cattle slaughtering has been banned and that during festivals such as Thai Pongal they are kind enough to express gratitude to Cattle, who play an important role in the traditional Indian farmstead.

As such it is greatly disappointing that cattle slaughtering continues to take place in Sri Lanka, a country which boasts an agricultural economic design, says Weerawansa .

He therefore requests the President to take necessary measures to immediately ban cattle slaughtering in Sri Lanka.  

Did the Buddha fail?



article_image
By Dr Upul Wijayawardhana-May 24, 2013

Dear reader, please hold fire before accusing me of insulting the Buddha, with my title, as it is the last thing I wish to do during this season of Vesak. In fact, the longer I live the more I realise the greatness of the Buddha. Perhaps, to avoid confusion I should have titled this piece "Why did Buddha fail in the country of his birth?" as, probably, it is India that recognises his greatness least by not following His teachings. I am reminded of the Sinhala saying "Game Buduwennawath epa" which highlights the dictum that you are least appreciated in the place of your birth!

These thoughts occurred to me while watching the DVD of the masterpiece of a film, Water, by Indian born Canadian director Deepa Mehta, admittedly eight years too late! However with utmost pride, I read in 2007 that our own Sarala Kariyawasam won the Best Young Performer in an International Feature Film Award presented by the Hollywood’s Young Artists Foundation, I could see it only recently. This was partly because the film did not have wide release in UK but mostly because I was too busy with my work. Having retired and still being busy, I now wonder how I had time to work!

I was not surprised at all to read in the ‘Encyclopedia of World Biography’ that Stephen Spielberg told Deepa Mehta, at the Toronto International Film Festival in September 2005 where it was first screened, that Water was the best film he had seen in the past five years. I can not recollect a film that has evoked so much of emotion in me; how fellow human beings are being discriminated against in the name of religion; how the teachings of the greatest human being that ever lived are being totally disregarded in the country of his birth.

Water is the last of Mehta’s ‘Elements Trilogy’ and she is well known to tackle controversial subjects; the first, Fire, released in 1996 was about a lesbian relationship; second, Earth released in 1998 was about the trauma of partition of India. In a way, the delay had its own advantages though I must confess I would have missed a wonderful film if not for the kind gesture of our daughter whose gift made me see both discs of DVD set. Had I seen the film on release, I would have missed the masses of information in the second DVD, specially the 2005 TV interviews (Scanning the movies) of Deepa Mehta by John Pungente. Mehta got the inspiration for Water by an incident that occurred on the banks of the Ganges in 1980s; a widow in her eighties was looking high and low for something and burst into tears when she could not find it; a pair of spectacles which was her only worldly possession. Having realised the plight of widows even in the eighties, she decided to make a film set in late 1930s, an era when child marriage was still legal in India but more importantly, it was the time of awakening under the inspiration of Mahatma Gandhi. Mehta wished to portray how religion was misinterpreted and she has done so very successfully. There are some memorable lines which illustrate this: ‘A Brahamin can sleep with any woman and they should consider they are blessed’

What I was intrigued by most was the scale of the protests that erupted in Varnasi when filming began in January 2000. There were death threats on the director and the cast, threats of suicides in protest and, finally, the complete set built on the banks of river Ganges were destroyed. This, in the very place where the Buddha preached his first sermon, ‘Dhammachakka Pavattana Sutta’. His message of non-violence and loving kindness seems to have got lost in time. Buddhists account for less than 0.02% of the Varanasi population.

Mehta abandoned filming in Varnasi in February 2000 and rejected offers for filming in other states of India. It was our luck that with the support of her second husband, George Hamilton, who was also the producer of the film, Mehta started filming in Sri Lanka, with a new cast and under a false title (River Moon), in 2003. It was lovely to see the beauty of our countryside and at the very beginning of the film, though for a brief period, my friend and relation, Buddhi Wickrama portraying an Indian Villager. The entire cast gave a superb performance, no doubt enhanced by excellent direction but the most mesmerising performance, without a shred of doubt, was by Sarala Kariyawasam in her portrayal of the child widow, Chuyia. Jeannette Catsoulis of The New York Times has commented that ‘never has the Ganges looked so inviting’.

Buddha was a rebel who stood against the caste system, which was enshrined into Hinduism by Brahamins, obviously for their own gains. His words were:

‘Na jatta vasalo hoti, na jatta hoti brahmano

Kammana vasalo hoti, kammana hoti brahmano’

‘By birth not one becomes an untouchable or a Brahamin

By action alone one becomes an untouchable or a Brahamin’

Though it is still a prominent feature in Indian society, fortunately, caste system is a diminishing entity in Sri Lanka which may have been consigned to history if not for the exploitation of it by politicians to win votes! Our Sangha is also not without blame as they persist with a ‘Nikaya’ system at least partly based on cast. Therefore, the question in my title has a relevance to us as well.

The Hindu hierarchy adopted a very pragmatic, some may say cunning, attitude towards Buddha. Rather than categorisng him as a rebel they incorporated by making Him the ninth ‘Avatar’ of Vishnu. Thus Buddhism was ‘swallowed ‘by Hinduism and if not for the actions of Emperor Ashoka would have been a forgotten entity or, at best, a minority religion. This is in sharp contrast to the way Jews and Romans treated Jesus Christ, yet another rebel, whose death on the Cross made him a martyr.It is regrettable that some western journalists, either through ignorance or by design, try to portray that violence is a part of Buddhism, while commenting on the foolish acts of violence some are committing in the name of Buddhism in Sri Lanka and Myanmar. BBC, no longer an impartial broadcaster when it comes to news, recently had an analysis where it was stated that Emperor Asoka used violence to spread Buddhism, ignoring the fact that Asoka became a Buddhist after he united India by a series of wars.

Emperor Asoka’s ‘Dhammaduta’ missions need no elaboration as they are very well known. Due his efforts Buddhism became the dominant religion in Asia and the East but over a period of time declined in India till the resurgence, after independence from the British, due to the conversion of Dr Ambedkar, one of the architects of the Indian constitution. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedker, in spite of belonging to an ‘untouchable’ caste , by sheer effort became a leading economist of his day. He was the Chairman of the drafting committee of the Indian Constitution and the first minister of law of independent India. Under the spiritual guidance of Ven. Dr. Hammalawa Saddhatissa Thera, who later became the head of London Buddhist Vihara, Dr Ambedkar and over half a million of ‘untouchables’ embraced Buddhism at a rally held in Nagpur on 14 October 1956.

The triumvirate that preserved Buddhism is completed by Anagarika Dhammapala, whose efforts, in addition to rejuvenating Buddhism in Sri Lanka, resulted in getting the holy sites including ‘Bodh Gaya’ and Mulaghandakuti Vihara back to the Buddhists. He formed the Mahabodhi society and lectured on Buddhism in Asia, Europe and North America.

What is important is not the position but the ability to stand challenges of Science. The fundamental truths of Buddhism have stood the challenges of science and will become increasingly attractive to the educated. In a way, the greatest disservice to Buddhism is to categorise it as a religion. It is a philosophy, a way of life, a religion, a science—all welded together.

The Buddha showed us the path and told us the way to honour him is to take steps along the path but we try to distort the path to suit our purposes. We are keener on ‘Amisa pooja’ than ‘Pratipatti puja’.

Did Buddha fail? No, He did not but by our ignorance we have failed him!

Friday, May 24, 2013

38 dogs ruthlessly poisoned for government Wesak celebrations

2013 Vesak 

(Lanka-e-News -24.May.2013, 2.00PM) Dog biting man is known widely. Man biting dog is rare . But here in SL is a case where a group is doing a worse thing even than biting a dog – they are bestial humans deliberately killing dogs - and mind you that is in Wesak season !!

The Wesak celebration that is being held under the auspices of Medamulana MaRa had caused the death of 38 dogs by poisoning, according to reports. This year the Government Wesak celebrations are being held at the Butthala Yudhaganawa Raja maha Vihara . Since the dogs that are in the Buttala Town can be a hindrance to the Wesak celebrations , by mixing meat with poison , they have been made to eat and die.

Just yesterday alone 38 dogs were found dead in the Buttala Town and its environs following the consumption of poisoned meat. The Buttala municipal council had cleared their decayed carcasses.

During the discussions in connection with the Buttala Wesak celebrations by the government , it had been pointed out the dogs roaming the streets in Buttala town can be a hindrance . Based on a decision to rid this menace , this killing could have taken place . To groups for whom killing humans is simple, killing dogs is simpler even during Wesak.

Among the dogs killed there were those which were pets and had owners . The latter therefore are cursing the heartless killers who committed these acts considered as most evil and a sin specially during the Wesak season .


2009 Vesak




33 hospitalised due to food poisoning

FRIDAY, 24 MAY 2013
Thirty three devotees who took part in a Pooja this morning at the kovil in Thirukkovil, Ampara were taken ill due to food poisoning and were admitted to the Thirukkovil District Hospital, Hospital sources said.

A three year old child was transferred to the Akkaraipattu Base Hospital for further treatment.


Sri Lanka's post Geneva progress being looked into by the US, says TNA
Thu, May 23, 2013, 11:31 am SL Time, ColomboPage News Desk, Sri Lanka.

Lankapage LogoMay 23, Colombo: Sri Lanka's Tamil National Alliance (TNA) says that the United States is looking into the progress made by the government following the resolution adopted at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in March this year.
TNA parliamentarian M.A. Sumanthiran has been quoted in the local media saying that US Ambassador to Sri Lanka Michele J. Sison has met with TNA representatives last week to discuss the UNHRC resolution and see what progress has been made since it was adopted.
He has said that the US envoy was also briefed on the land issue in the north and she was told by the TNA that taking over civilian land is in complete contravention of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) recommendations.
Sumanthiran has added that they had discussed about the elections scheduled to be held in the Northern Province in September.

The TNA has told Sison that a free and fair election cannot be expected in a militarized environment and had emphasized the need for foreign election monitors for the polls.

Four years on, genocide continues off the battlefield

In May 2009 as the armed conflict between the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and the government of Sri Lanka came to a harrowing end, Sri Lanka’s genocidal offensive against the Tamil population of the North-East reached a peak. Four years on, as the Tamil nation – scattered worldwide through decades of oppression and armed conflict – remembers the massacre that took place, the prospect of a stable and secure future remains bleak. Sri Lanka has long proven itself both incapable and unwilling to deliver accountability and justice to the Tamil people, yet the international community too has failed to instigate a credible process towards it. But most of all, the systematic destruction of the Tamil identity continues, unchecked. 
It is increasingly evident that the mantra of granting Sri Lanka time, space, economic support and international engagement is not leading to a process of accountability, reconciliation or peace for the Tamils. Torture, disappearance, rape and murder prevail; the economic and political fabric of Tamil society is repressed. What the Sri Lankan government celebrated as the defeat of one of the world’s largest ‘terrorist’ organisations has not brought security to the Tamil nation.
The true extent of the destruction that took place in 2009 remains unknown. UN estimates of the numbers of Tamil civilians killed range from 40,000 to over 70,000 (notwithstanding the 146,679 unaccounted for). A panel of UN experts, citing ‘credible allegations’ of war crimes and crimes against humanity on both sides, concluded that the vast majority of Tamil deaths were caused by government shelling. The panel accused government forces of ordering Tamil civilians into designated ‘no-fire zones’ only to shell the areas with heavy artillery, as well as intentionally targeting hospitals. Those Tamils who survived found themselves pressed into government territory and detained in militarised camps for months afterwards. UN experts stated they were deliberately and systematically deprived of humanitarian aid, food and sanitation in these camps through the government’s intentional deflation of numbers.
Beyond the constraints of the outdated Genocide Convention and the burden of proof of ‘genocidal intent’, to Tamils, there is no doubt that the terror unleashed upon them was genocide. The Tamil use of the term is not hyperbole; it is instead a bold stand of the Tamil nation not to shy away from expressing its self-understanding of its own lived experiences. Crucially, only the term genocide encapsulates the sociological and political treatment of the Tamil nation by the Sri Lankan state over the past 60 years.
Continuum of genocide
History makes clear that atrocities on this scale do not occur in isolation. The massacre of Tamils in 2009 came as the predictable zenith of 60 years of escalating oppression and persecution of the Tamil nation by successive governments. Previous measures such as the Citizenship Act, Sinhala Only Act, standardisation in education and the new republican constitution of 1978 were calculated to undermine the Tamil nation’s place in the island and consolidate Sinhala-Buddhist hegemony. Open attacks on the nation were unleashed - the crucible of Tamil history and literature as the Jaffna library was burnt, peaceful Tamil protests were violently crushed and thousands of Tamils were murdered in state sponsored pogroms. It was from this backdrop that the Tamil call for independence in 1976 and armed Tamil resistance advocating secession emerged.
Equally, the mass slaughtering of tens of thousands of Tamil civilians by the ethnically pure Sinhala military in 2009, could not have taken place without the collusion of the Sinhala majority: the competitive chauvinism of the Sinhala polity, active endorsement by large swathes of the media, complicity of the judiciary and the silent apathy of wider Sinhala society.
Whilst the absence of armed conflict has halted overt slaughter, the Sri Lankan state has escalated the dismantling of the Tamil identity in the North-East, deconstructing the very basis of the Tamil assertion of nationhood, homeland and the right to self-determination. Through the appropriation of privately owned Tamil land using dubious ‘legal’ measures and wholesale militarised seizure, the state-sponsored resettlement of Sinhala families and the establishment of militarised ‘high security zones’, the ethnic demography of the North-East is effectively being re-engineered. Sinhala resettlement was later used as justification for a string of other measures including changing place names from Tamil to Sinhalese and erecting Buddhist stupas while Tamil places of worship such as temples and churches remain destroyed.
It is not chance that the recent accelerated land grabs come as the government, succumbing to international pressure, announced a provincial council election in the North. Though the elections serve no purpose - the provincial council system cannot provide any solutions to the immediate problems of the Tamil people nor form a basis through which a political solution can be explored - the government is actively working to ensure that the Tamil nation is denied control of even a vacuous body like the Provincial Council. The government’s introduction of a carefully vetted pool of ‘rehabilitated’ Tamil electoral candidates, its active endorsement of paramilitary parties and increasing attacks against members of the Tamil nationalist polity and press, strikes at the very heart of Tamil political power – forcibly dissipating its voter base and installing fear within the electorate.
Alongside the dismantling of Tamil society and polity, the deliberate suppression of the North-East economy ensures that the character of the Tamil people as a nation, with a sustainable homeland, is meticulously erased. Sri Lanka’s rhetoric of ‘development’ belies the state-sponsored transfer of farming lands to Sinhala farmers, curtailment of Tamil fishing opportunities and the military’s encroachment on an array of employment sectors including transportation, housing development and tourism.
Need for accountability
Crimes of this magnitude necessitate accountability and justice. Since 2009, the Tamil calls for an independent, international investigation, as the only means to this end, have been unanimous and unwavering. From Tamil political representatives such as the Tamil National Alliance and the Tamil National People’s Front, to Tamil civil society groups in the North-East and the diaspora, there is a resounding consensus: Sri Lanka must not be left to investigate itself. In over 60 years there has been no historic precedent of Sri Lanka delivering justice to Tamils for crimes committed by the state or its stooges. Emboldened by this endemic impunity, it has instead habitually stalled, producing a litany of failed reconciliation initiatives and rejecting external suggestions of improvement. Against a backdrop of intimidation, white-van abductions, and assassinations, it routinely silences anyone attempting to unearth the truth.
From the outset, Sri Lanka responded to credible allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity with outlandish assertions: ‘zero-civilian casualties’ and a ‘humanitarian rescue operation’. Its rejection of international calls to investigate both sides was followed by histrionic accusations of neo-colonialists and terrorist proxies levelled against advocates of an international investigation. Sri Lanka’s eventual response to pressure, the internal Lessons Learnt Reconciliation Commission (LLRC), in line with its predecessors, resolutely fails to credibly address accountability or justice. From its stated objectives (including to “clear the good name of the army”) and formation, to the context of militarisation and intimidation in which it took place, the LLRC has proved the opposite of a credible, independent inquiry.
That it was appointed by the President to investigate crimes that he, as Commander in Chief of the Sri Lankan Armed Forces and his brother as Defence Secretary, were primarily implicated in, underscores its inconsequence. Crucially, this lack of will reverberates outside the ruling government, into the wider Sinhala polity and Sri Lanka’s influential Buddhist clergy, as well as the judiciary and press. Given this, the international community’s continued calls for Sri Lanka to investigate itself reveal a dismaying lack of commitment to deliver justice to Tamils.
In the context of an ethnic conflict, a collective sense of closure is vital for any prospect of reconciliation and lasting stability to resolve deep-rooted feelings of anger, resentment and mistrust. In the case of Sri Lanka, closure could not be further away. Four years on, Tamils continue to find themselves at the mercy of those who celebrate the pinnacle of their torment as a ‘victory’, and are actively destroying the very fabric of the Tamil identity. Anything short of an international inquiry – be it 'truth and reconciliation' commissions or political settlements in exchange for blanket amnesties – will not only continue to grant impunity and embolden an already brutal regime, but will fuel simmering resentment, and pave the way for yet more intractable conflict on the island. The suggestion that Tamils must trust in the future good will and reformed ways of today’s perpetrators and their assenters – who, as numerical superiors within a unitary state, will always remain democratically unchallengeable – is repulsive.
On a global level, the international community's abysmal failure to uphold its own much-touted adage of 'never again' in 2009, has already inspired the macabre propagation of the 'Sri Lankan model of counter-terrorism’. The continued failure to deliver justice for crimes such as genocide will inspire tomorrow's perpetrators worldwide.  
Enduring contradiction
The marking of May 18th embodies the enduring contradiction at the crux of the island’s ethnic conflict. Amidst heavy restrictions on Tamils in the North-East to exercise their right to memory, the Tamil nation comes together to remember the nadir of the genocide it has faced and that which it continues to face; the Sri Lankan state meanwhile marks its greatest victory. The images of death and suffering that form the collective Tamil memory of 2009 are irreconcilable with the images of triumphant soldiers parading their ‘success’ and a jubilant Sinhala nation waving the Sri Lankan flag.
Images of Tamil suffering and the expression of collective agony, though not in itself celebrated, have failed to provoke the collective conscience of the Sinhala nation. When Tamils took to the streets in their hundreds of thousands, to protest day and night against events unfolding, the Sinhala nation applauded the military’s progress. What the Tamil nation mourned as the crushing of resistance against oppression was embraced by the Sinhala nation as the restoration of the natural state of Sinhala Buddhist rule across the entirety of the island.
Four years on, the contrast is no less profound. Running directly counter to Sri Lanka’s determination to reject an international inquiry, is the Tamil campaign for it. As rallies that took place this May 18th and Tamil attempts at legal action against travelling Sri Lankan military officials reveal, the passing of time has only strengthened the Tamil demand for accountability and justice. Assertions that the quest for justice is being pursued only by the ‘disconnected and radicalised’ diaspora, whilst the Tamils in the North-East only desire ‘development’, are evidently false. Instead, as recent prosecutions of aging Nazi criminals illustrate, the gnawing ache of injustice felt by those who faced persecution does not diminish with time. It cannot be reconciled with truth alone, and it will not be pacified by economic prosperity. Rather, only everyday security and normalcy can form the foundation on which the quest for justice can be launched. As the Tamil nation takes stock this May 18th, acutely mindful of the on-going structural genocide, the need for justice and accountability is reinforced - and so too the Tamil nation’s resolve to pursue it. 
Image courtesy of Shelley Morris | shelleymorrisphotography

Dr. Sivakami Rajamanoharan is a political and human rights activist, and a practicing doctor in London. Kumaravadivel Guruparan is a lecturer at the Department of Law of the University of Jaffna. He is also a practicing attorney-at-law and an active member of Tamil civil society.

Annual Report 2013

The state of the world's human rights

Head of state and government
Mahinda Rajapaksa
Unlawful detentions, torture and enforced disappearances remained rife and went unpunished. Government officials and supporters harassed and threatened human rights defenders, journalists and members of the judiciary who spoke out about abuses of power or advocated human rights accountability. More than three years after the armed conflict between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) ended, impunity persisted for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. The government failed to implement recommendations aimed at accountability made by Sri Lanka’s Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) and the UN Human Rights Council. The authorities continued to rely on the Prevention of Terrorism Act to arrest and detain suspects for lengthy periods without charge or trial. Despite government claims, many people displaced by the armed conflict were not fully settled, including some whose land remained occupied by the Sri Lankan military.

Enforced disappearances

More than 20 alleged enforced disappearances were reported. Victims included political activists, business people and suspected criminals. Prominent cases from past years remained unresolved.
  • Armed men abducted Tamil businessman Ramasamy Prabaharan on 11 February, just two days before the Supreme Court was scheduled to hear his complaints against arbitrary arrest, detention and torture by police and seizure of his business in May 2009.
  • In April, Frontline Socialist Party activists Premakumar Gunaratnam and Dimuthu Attigala were abducted shortly before the launch of the new party; both were interrogated and eventually released. Premakumar Gunaratnam, an Australian citizen, said he was tortured by his abductors, who he believed were linked to the government.
  • Investigations failed to progress into the cases of political activists Lalith Kumar Weeraraj and Kugan Muruganathan – both allegedly victims of enforced disappearance by the army in Jaffna in December 2011. The two had been planning a peaceful protest by families of the disappeared. The Court of Appeal repeatedly postponed the habeas corpus case filed by relatives of the missing men.
  • In June, former Attorney General Mohan Peiris was ordered to appear at a habeas corpus hearing into the disappearance of political cartoonist Prageeth Eknaligoda after he told the UN Committee against Torture in 2011 that Eknaligoda was living in a foreign country. At the hearing, Mohan Peiris admitted that he did not know Prageeth Eknaligoda’s whereabouts and claimed he could not remember who said he was in exile.

Gota opposes  NPC polls

article_image
By Shamindra Ferdinando-


Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa yesterday warned the government of dire consequences in case the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) won the first northern provincial council election.

The Defence Secretary was responding to a statement attributed to Petroleum Minister Anura Priyadarshana Yapa, at Wednesday’s post-cabinet media briefing, that the election would be held in accordance with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution. Minister Yapa ruled out the possibility of diluting the 13th Amendment before the election.

Asked whether he would publicly campaign against the decision, the Gajaba Regiment veteran said: "As the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, my responsibility is to warn the government of the grave repercussions of empowering a hostile provincial administration with land and police powers. Police powers in the hands of those still pursuing a separatist agenda can pose a severe threat to national security."

The Defence Secretary said that the government should carefully examine the 13th Amendment to the Constitution without succumbing to international and domestic pressure. Declining to comment on the

SLFP-led UPFA being divided on the issue with some constituents, the National Freedom Front and the Jathika Hela Urumaya voicing strong opposition to the proposed polls, the Defence Secretary said that the northern provincial administration could pursue the eelam project.

Responding to a query, the outspoken official said that he accepted the need to hold the northern provincial council election. "But having paid a heavy price in the battlefield to eradicate the LTTE, it would be foolish on our part to create conditions for a new war," the Defence Secretary said. "I cannot impose my will on the political establishment. But, I intend to tell those who still consider the 13th Amendment as panacea for all our ills, it’ll be the primary cause for another conflict," he said.

Tajapaksa that the government should immediately launch a wide ranging discussion on the 13th Amendment. "Let there be an open discussion on the issue. The legal fraternity can also examine it," the official said.

Devolution of police and land powers meant that the Northern Province comprising the districts of Jaffna, Mullaitivu, Vavuniya, Mannar and Kilinochchi could pose a major security challenge, the Defence Secretary said. A hostile administration could interfere with anti-terrorism investigations undertaken by the government as well as positioning of personnel in the northern region, he said.

Had the LTTE accepted the Indo-Lanka Accord (ILA) it could have had easily achieved eelam, the Defence Secretary said. Perhaps the LTTE, at that time, had failed to realize the 13th Amendment introduced in accordance with the ILA met its demand for a separate administration. Due to its arrogance and over confidence in military capability, the LTTE provoked the Indian Army to declare war on them in October 1987, the Defence Secretary said.

Gotabhaya statement reconfirms emptiness in PC model

TamilNet[TamilNet, Friday, 24 May 2013, 11:31 GMT]
While New Delhi and Washington harp on either the 13th Amendment or holding Northern Provincial Elections (NPC) as solutions to the national question in the island of Sri Lanka, a statement coming from SL presidential sibling Gotabhaya Rajapaksa reconfirms the unworkable nature of the Provincial Council (PC) model in a unitary constitution of the Sinhala state, Tamil political observers in the island said. Mr Gotabhaya Rajapaksa was warning the government of his brother Mahinda Rajapaksa that giving police and land powers to the provinces meant that the Northern Province comprising the districts of Jaffna, Mullaiththeevu, Vavuniyaa, Mannaar and Ki'linochchi could pose a ‘major security challenge’, reported the Island on Thursday. 

If even the police and land powers to the provincial councils that are already there in the 13th Amendment cannot be implemented, how could ‘lasting solutions’ could be arrived at through the unitary constitution of the Sri Lankan state, the observers further commented. 

"I cannot impose my will on the political establishment. But, I intend to tell those who still consider the 13th Amendment as panacea for all our ills, it’ll be the primary cause for another conflict," Mr Gotabhaya Rajapakasa, was quoted by the The Island as saying. 

Gotabhaya was responding on Thursday to a statement attributed to SL minister Anura Priyadharshana Yapa on Wednesday, when the SL minister ruled out the possibility of ‘diluting the 13th Amendment’ before the elections to the NPC. 

Already, 6 months ago, the Colombo-based newspaper said, “Gotabhaya Rajapaksa likened the 13th Amendment to the Norway arranged Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) finalized in Feb 2002.”

Paraphrasing Gotabhaya as saying that the 13th Amendment was nothing but an impediment to the post-war development process, the paper on 13 October, 2012, quoted him as saying that "[t]he 13th Amendment and the CFA didn’t serve the people of Sri Lanka. Instead, they facilitated interests of various other parties, including the LTTE. Interestingly both supported the separatist cause,” The Island quoted the SL presidential sibling as saying.


Related Articles:
04.11.08   13th Amendment: arousing a zombie