Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, May 8, 2013


Pakistan's Imran Khan 'stable' after fall

Cricketer turned politician suffers injuries in Lahore incident on a day marked by deadly election-related violence.

Last Modified: 08 May 2013 12:03



Imran Khan, the chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf political party, has been injured after falling from a makeshift stage during a campaign rally in Lahore.

The cricketer turned politician fell 14 feet as he was stepping off an improvised forklift that was raising him to the top of the platform. Local TV station Geo TV aired footage of the accident and showed Khan bleeding and unconscious with a gash on his head.

Al Jazeera's Asad Hashim, reporting from Lahore's Shaukat Khanum Memorial Hospital where Khan is being treated, said he is conscious, having suffered two fractures to his spinal column but not to his spinal cord.

He said Khan has no life-threatening injuries.

The hospital, which was set up by Khan himself, told Al Jazeera earlier that they were carrying out further tests and intended to keep Khan overnight.

At a news conference, Shah Mehmood Quershi, vice chairman of Khan's PTI party said Khan was in hospital and recovering well and was continuing to advise the party on its campaign strategy and party policy, with campaign events due to continue as normal after Wednesday.

Thursday is the last day of campaigning, and the PTI will hold a rally in Islamabad as scheduled, with Khan due to address the rally via telephone or video link.

Al Jazeera's Kamal Hyder, reporting from Islamabad, said the politician hit a metal rod as he fell from the forklift; there was no first aid available and no ambulance was on site at the time of the incident.

Rival candidate in the general election, Nawaz Sharif, said he was suspending his campaigning plans for Wednesday as a mark of respect for Khan.

The incident in Lahore occurred on a day marked by multiple blasts targeting election rallies. In the Upper Dir district of northwest Pakistan, two people were killed and three injured after a grenade attack.

Earlier on Tuesday, an attack on a political rally of the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) in Lower Dir's Baba Gam village killed at least six people and injured dozens more.

An improved explosive device caused the blast, near a vehicle carrying Zahir Shah, the brother of Muhammad Zamin Khan, the PPP candidate from the PK-96 constituency. Zahir Shah was killed in the attack.

Hangu bombing

In another incident on Tuesday, a bomb exploded at a political party rally a district in northwest Pakistan of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) party, killing at least 10 people and wounding dozens more, including a provincial candidate.

The JUI rally in a bazaar in Hangu was being led by Mufti Seyd Janan, who is reported to be not in a serious condition.

Reports indicated that children returning home from school were among the wounded.

It is thought that a bomb was planted on a motorbike and exploded by remote control near Janan's vehicle.

JUI has historically been sympathetic to the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and has previously acted as a mediator between political parties and the anti-government group.

The TTP, however, claimed responsibility for an attack on the JUI on Monday which killed 25 people and wounded 60 more.

It is thought the target of that attack was a candidate, Munir Orakzai, who survived the blast.
Pakistan's elections are due to be held on May 11, with all campaigning to cease by May 9.

Al Jazeera's Hyder said the violence surrounding the elections was a source of great concern.

"The TTP has said it will sabotage these elections, which it believes are against Islam," he said. "Previously it has been targeting secular parties, but now it appears to be targeting religious parties as well."



Military called to transport Rajapaksa’s horse

Wednesday, 08 May 2013
One of the younger Rajapaksa sons while on a visit to Nuwara Eliya some time ago with his girl friend had visited the Turf Club.
During the visit to the Turf Club, the girl friend had liked one of the horses at the club and asked her beau to get the animal for her.
The young Rajapaksa had valiantly stepped forward and purchased the horse with ‘his’ money.
In the usual Rajapaksa fashion of snapping fingers and ordering people around, he had asked the officials at the Turf Club to immediately transport the horse to Colombo.
The Turf Club officials have stood firm and said that the young Rajapaksa would have to arrange his own transport to take the horse to Colombo.
An angry Rajapaksa had then ordered the military to send a carriage to transport the horse to Colombo.

Namal and Basil clash again

Wednesday, 08 May 2013
The cold war between Economic Development Minister Basil Rajapaksa and nephew Namal Rajapaksa has surfaced once again over the recruitment of persons to fill several vacancies at the Economic Development Ministry.
Namal had prepared a list of his supporters and handed it over to one of his coordinating secretaries to hand over to the Economic Development Ministry. Namal’s Secretary had asked that persons to fill the vacancies at the Ministry be selected from the list given by the First Son.
However, Basil had also prepared a separate list of names to fill the vacancies.
Hearing about Namal’s move, Basil had ordered his Ministry officials to discard Namal’s list and to fill the vacancies with the list given by him.
When Namal had heard of Basil’s order, he had said that this was not the first time that Basil had ignored his directives and he would show his strength soon.

Aviation Minister forced to sign Sajin’s Cabinet paper

Wednesday, 08 May 2013
Aviation Minister Priyankara Jayaratne was forced to sign the Cabinet paper approving US$ 2.5 billion (Rs. 315 billion) to purchase new aircraft for SriLankan Airlines, reliable sources said.
Jayaratne had refused to sign the Cabinet paper approving billions of rupees to purchase aircraft to the airline since it had recorded a loss of around Rs. 20 billion last year as well. The Minister had said that there would be criticism leveled against the move by the opposition. However, the President’s confidential financial advisor, Sajin Vass Gunawardena had forced Jayaratne to sign the Cabinet paper.
Although The Sunday Times newspaper had published a news story on the purchase of new aircraft, the newspaper had ensured that the impact of the deal and the persons behind the deal were kept a secret.
The deal to purchase aircrafts had been coordinated by Sajin Vass Gunawardena and CEO of SriLankan Airlines, Kapila Chandrasena. The First Lady’s brother, who is the Chairman of SriLankan Airlines, Nishantha Wickremasinghe had also helped carry out the deal.
While the US company, Boeing had also put forward tenders to provide aircraft to SriLankan airlines, the tender was assigned to the French based Airbus company. The local agent for the company is one of the President’s relatives and a billionaire businessman, Thiru Nadesan.
Thiru Nadesan is Minister Basil Rajapaksa’s business partner and husband of Deputy Minister Nirupama Rajapaksa.
According to the Cabinet approval, six of the Airbus A330-300 aircraft valued at US$ 234 million are to be purchased. Also, four A350-900 aircraft are to be purchased as well. One such aircraft is valued at US$ 283 million.
Apart from purchasing 10 aircraft, the Cabinet has also approved monies to purchase spare parts for the aircraft for the next 10 years.

Markham kids show off robotics skills in South Korea

York RegionMarkham Economist & Sun
Robots are more than machines in sci-fi films. In the real world, robots are used on assembly lines to do work more efficiently and even in firefighting.
Two young people from Markham hope to be part of this fascinating industry.
Robots the Grade 7 John McCrae Public School students designed, programmed and built drove across tables without falling off and moved Ping-pong balls from a tabletop into a container at the 14th annual International Robot Olympiad in South Korea.
Jonathan Ara Yapeter and Maaran Murugathas took home a bronze medal after they entered two competitions, one timed, the other technical.
In the first event, they were given three hours to build a robot from scratch and program it to do a specific mission given on the spot.
Hundreds of students from 18 countries including the U.S., Mexico, China, Japan, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Philippines, Malaysia and Indonesia, took part in the event.
The Markham boys had to program and build a robot from scratch that could pick up Ping-pong balls and put them into a cylindrical container.
Their robot raced through the simulated task of moving tiny people — represented by the ping-pong balls — from a disaster area and placing them in a hospital.
“This is like a real life mission just on a smaller scale,” Jonathan said.
In the second event, competitors picked a topic and built a robot to match.
Maaran and Jonathan developed a robot designed to take and process tissue and DNA samples while a doctor examines you.
The pair have been participating in Robofest events in Canada and the U.S. since they were both in Grade 4.
Their hope is one day, technology and robotics will be part of everyday life.
“This is the future,” Jonanthan said. “Engineers are using it. And now we know something about it and are doing something with it.”
It all starts with a wall of ideas, then a robot prototype and then a program that will transform a robot kit made from lego to life.
Commands such as ‘go’, ‘stop’ and ‘back up’ are translated into a visual programming module where digital blocks or codes placed in sequence are used to program the robot’s movements. The robot is then synced with the program via bluetooth.
There is a lot of trial and error, working until the prototype matches the program, Maaran said.
The pair was the only team representing Canada at the Olympiad. “There are other countries ahead of us,” Maaran said.
South Korea is one such place, where firefighters use robotics to put out fires, find people trapped in burning buildings and determine the origin of the fire, Maaran said.

Queen to miss Commonwealth meeting in Sri Lanka

TUESDAY 07 MAY 2013
Channel 4 NewsThe Queen will not attend this year's Commonwealth summit as the palace reviews her long-haul travel. But there are calls for Britain to boycott the meeting due to Sri Lanka's human rights record.
The Queen has been present at every Commonwealth summit in the last 40 years - a sign of the importance she places on her role at the head of the Commonwealth.
But this year, Prince Charles will take her place at the meeting in Sri Lanka in November after Buckingham Palace said that the number of long-haul flights taken by the 87-year-old monarch was being reviewed.
However Britain is facing pressure to boycott the two-yearly Commonwealth heads of government meeting (CHOGM) altogether, because it is being hosted by the government of Sri Lanka, which is accused of war crimes.
Human rights groups last week criticised David Cameron's decision to attend the summitCanada's government has said it will boycott the meeting, with the country's foreign minister saying that allowing Sri Lanka to host it would be "accommodating evil".
It is nothing to do with the political situation in Sri Lanka.Buckingham Palace
The United Nations says at least 40,000 Tamil civilians were killed by Sri Lankan government forces in the final stages of the civil war which ended four years ago amid evidence of war crimes. The government there has consistently denied its involvement.
In March, two former foreign secretaries – one Labour, one Conservative – told Channel 4 News they thought it would be "grotesque" for the Queen to be required to attend the meeting in a country which is accused of persistent human rights crimes. Human rights campaigners have also expressed concern about the disappearance, torture and murder of government critics.
Buckingham Palace said the Queen's decision not to attend was not a political one. "It is nothing to do with the political situation in Sri Lanka," said a spokesman."The key point here is that the Queen will be represented, although she is not there in person, by the Prince of Wales."
The Queen was forced to cancel her appearance at the Commonwealth Day service in Westminster Abbey in March after a bout of gastroenteritis.

Political pressure

The Global Tamil Forum told Channel 4 News it was "relieved" that the Queen would not be attending. "However Prince Charles and the prime minister seem to be on course to wipe out all the pressure that has been built through the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) process in the last two years," said Suren Surendiran.
Shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander called on the prime minister to review his attendance if certain conditions are not met.
"David Cameron must be clear about the progress Sri Lanka needs to make before he confirms his attendance at November's Commonwealth summit in Colombo.
"He has a responsibility to use the prospect of the summit to encourage Sri Lanka to meet its international obligations and address concerns about ongoing human rights violations."
Downing Street said last week that Mr Cameron would be delivering a "very tough message" to the Sri Lankan government at the meeting.

Tuesday, May 7, 2013


What Crime Salley Has Committed? Tell Us Mr President!

By Laksiri Fernando -May 7, 2013
Dr. Laksiri Fernando
Colombo TelegraphIf there is a single act that the Rajapaksa regime has committed in the post-2009 era to abundantly reveal its authoritarian and undemocratic character then that is the arrest and detention of Azath Salley for 90 days under the Prevention of Terrorisms Act (PTA). It also exposes its chauvinistic bias against all minorities strengthening the activities and hate speech of the Sinhala extremists. The act polarizes the society and brings considerable discredit to the country and its people amongst the already disgruntled international community.
If the CID wanted to question him for any speech that he has made then it doesn’t need a period of 90 days. Even if that speech was inflammatory as alleged, he could have been questioned under the normal law without resorting to the draconian PTA. If he was involved in any credible ‘terrorist’ activities as the government propagandists try to portray then he cannot be a lone crusader. No other arrests have been made so far.
Of course there can be lone terrorists in this world but not of the type of Azath Salley. President Rajapaksashould know better than anyone else of his type. Salley was a supporter of the President in the second race to his present position in 2010 and even thereafter. He is of course an outspoken person and it is in this capacity that he was vociferously exposing the hate speech unleashed by the BBS and other organizations. Is that a crime? He must have also become very critical of President Rajapaksa and his family in recent times but that is not a crime at all. And that is the right thing to do. If he has asked the Muslims to defend themselves (not arm) there is nothing wrong in that either given the situation where law enforcement agencies are not protecting them. It is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) which says:
“Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law…”
Everyone has a constitutional right to know under what charges that he or she is arrested but Azath Salley or his family was not given any explanation. The advisors to the President must be thinking that in the background of the recent Boston bombing in the USA that the international sympathy could be gained for its acolytes’ campaign against Muslims in this country on various pretexts and excuses. That is a very dangerous game to play. If there is any danger to communal peace in the country at present, then that comes from the BBS and other similar organizations. The moderate Ministers in the government, if there is anyone left, should realise that the extremists led by the BBS even wanted to replace this government with a more right-wing and extremist outfit. There are sections in the defence establishment who are working hand and glove with that effort.
Salley should not be kept in secrecy. People in this country have a right to know what is happening behind the scenes. His health and wellbeing are concerns to the family, friends and the public. Salley’s political credentials are well known. He is the leader of the Muslim Tamil National Alliance and a former Deputy Mayor of the Colombo Municipal Council. Whatever he has said and done are in the interests of that party and the people represented by that party. If he has done anything beyond the legitimate limits, he should be charged before the courts without delay but not kept in custody secretively. But it should not be done only against him. Before that, the so-called Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara should be charged for inciting people against the Muslim community. His speeches and acts are very clear for the whole world to see.
The goon squad supported by the security mafia have been intimidating and harassing innocent Muslim civilians in their day to day lives including young women and children. The reports of these incidents are credible. There were many instances where they were physically attacked. But the law enforcement agencies have been keeping a blind eye on all these incidents. Under the circumstances, it is natural for an outspoken person like Salley to come up with his strongest condemnation not only against the BBS or the government but also the President. The President deserves that condemnation for his silence and perhaps indirect endorsement. The arrest of Salley is part and parcel of that scheme.
Anyone should understand that the danger is not persons like Salley. If the government creates a situation where the Muslim community is unnecessarily intimidated and persecuted, it creates a situation for the global extremists to infiltrate the country. If the Defence Secretary thinks that his security arrangements are watertight and impenetrable, he is badly mistaken. It would be the innocent ordinary civilians of all communities of the Sinhalese, the Tamils and the Muslims who would have to pay the price for the short sighted policies of a self-serving regime. Sri Lanka has just come out of one scourge of terrorism and it is self-destructively inviting a much worse kind to its midst.
Instead of Sri Lanka becoming the much boasted ‘five hubs,’ it will become a ‘hub of real international terrorism’ if the self-destructive policies of the present regime continues. The parochial thinking of the BBS and other Sinhala extremists naturally leads to this end as well. It is the thinking of nothing but the village thugs.
Azath Salley should have his full freedom of expression as far as he does not intimidate others, like the BBS do. He should have the equality before the law and justice. The Muslim community should be able to live without fear and intimidation. Sinhala extremists should not think that they have ‘higher’ or ‘special’ rights or Deva Himikam given by a Deva Raja. It is unfortunate that the National Human Rights Commission is silent on the developments in the recent past and keeps its cosy existence while the country is engulfed with immense human rights issues. The Commission and its members have a moral duty to intervene.
If Azath Salley is kept in CID custody (and this is not even legitimate remand) there is only one meaning to it. That is to torture him at least mentally if not physically to extract a forced confession for crimes that he has not committed. The CID now under the Defence Secretary is acting in that fashion. It is almost a week that Salley has been arrested. That is enough time to investigate what he has said and to determine whether they contravene any law in the country or not. He should be freed Mr President.

Exiled, from journalism

Story and photo by Dilrukshi Handunnetti

With the war against Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) intensifying in 2008, among journalists, the group to feel the most amount of pressure was the defence correspondents. The column writing slowed and ceased, and soon, media activists and dissenting opinion peddlers too came under severe pressure. The year 2008-2009 was dubbed annus hornbills for Sri Lankan journalists, for a reason. By the February 2009, over a dozen journalists have fled the island.

While there is no denying that some journalists and media workers, made use of the prevailing situation in the country to seek greener pastures in Europe and Nordic countries, claiming of various threats to themselves and families, there were activists and journalists who did not see this as an opportunity to live in the developed world, but intended to stay on and practice their craft. When they left the shores, it was done with bleeding hearts and with a strong sense of separation and being wronged by the State.

Deep-seated hurt

According to Poddala Jayantha, an investigative journalist cum media activist who currently lives in an undisclosed location in the United States, “Being separated from the country and the craft amount to living death.” The onetime President of the Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association (SLWJA), Jayantha became a regular victim of hate speech practiced by State television, branding him and others associated with media activism as ‘traitors.’ Some of them had honorary mentions on the government’s Defence Ministry website, sealing not just their fates but also their reputations.

When placed under severe pressure, Jayantha left Sri Lanka and took refuge in Nepal, with the hope of returning to Sri Lanka at the earliest opportunity. By then, The Sunday Leader’s founder editor, Lasantha Wickrematunge was slain and there was immense fear within the dissenting media community about not just the space for their craft, but for their physical safety.

A determined Jayantha, nevertheless returned soon after, hoping to pick up from where he had left off, only to be brutally assaulted, leaving him with permanent scars and a disability. “I miscalculated. I wanted to return and practice journalism. My disappointment knows no end,” he says, in a tearful voice.

The recipient of the prestigious Integrity Award 2010, Jayantha says, “In my mind, each morning I go to work, and sit at my desk. I imagine the smell of newsprint and the joy of writing an article. I daily break my heart knowing that it will never be my reality, again.”

As for his close associate and colleague, Sanath Balasuriya, now an exile journalist in Germany, it was a struggle that he would still want to continue, from his new base. “The personal tragedies we face are numerous. The condemnation and the quick judgment we have had to face only show how many enemies we dissenters will always encounter.”

Balasuriya came under serious threat after he gave leadership to an impromptu protest in front of the Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation (SLRC), demanding the removal of Minister Mervyn Silva, over his televised assault on a senior SLRC employee. The last public protest he gave leadership to was a protest against the murder of Lasantha Wickrematunge. “This protest must happen. There is no need for us to live here and call ourselves journalists, if not,” he said, at the protest venue. Having fled soon after, when it became evident that he was to be a target of violence, Jayasuriya was hoping to return when Jayantha was abducted and assaulted close to his home in Embuldeniya. Jayasuriya had to continue his exiled status.

Jasiharan and Valarmathy fled Sri Lanka, after their close associate, J.S. Tissainayagam was arrested, along with them. After many months of untold agonies, they now live in Switzerland.

“The less said the better,” says Jasiharan who feels the trauma that exiled journalists undergo, having to adapt to new cultures, climates, learn new languages and start life all over again, are not understood by those living in the safety and comfort of their homes in Sri Lanka.

“It is so much pain,” confirms his wife, Valarmathy. “I feel as we have lost our identities, completely.”

Painful experiences

For the exiled, besides having to deal with fears connected to physical safety, there are many new issues to deal with. “It is God’s punishment and a way of saying, start life all over again – without anything you had before. Not your self-respect or identity,” says one Geneva-based journalist, speaking on the basis of anonymity. “You see, deep within our hearts, we still dream of returning home. We want to return, and to practice journalism. We have nothing to do with those who opportunistically fled Sri Lanka, using a bad moment,” he says.

A few have managed to return home, but they privately agree that the kind of activism they dabbled in before 2008-2009, is decidedly a thing of the past. Celebrating World Press Freedom Day, a key activist who has worked on ensuring the safety of journalists under threat says, “The fact that we cannot even hold more than a couple of events a year also proves that we are scattered, our leadership is in exile and we have lost our never. We have been beaten too much, not just physically.”

According to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), there are over 400 journalists living in exile the world over, and nearly one fourth of them are form Sri Lanka, a media status any country claiming to be a democracy should do its best to avoid.

CPJ in a survey released three years ago noted, “The surge from Sri Lanka accounted for more than a quarter of the journalists worldwide who fled their native countries in the past year after being attacked, harassed, or threatened with violence or imprisonment.

“Sri Lanka is losing its best journalists to unchecked violence and the resulting conditions of fear and intimidation that are driving writers and editors from their homes,” Joel Simon, CPJ’s Executive Director, noted. “This is a sad reality in countries throughout the worlds where governments allow attacks on the press to go unpunished.”

In March 2010, Chief Justice Mohan Peiris who served as Attorney General of Sri Lanka at that time gave a public assurance that he was prepared to offer protection to any Sri Lankan journalist who wished to return from exile.

He was quoted widely in the media as having said: "Speaking for myself, and I’m fairly sure the government will back me up on this. There is no question that the government needs our journalists,” he reportedly told a CPJ delegation at his Colombo office.

“They must come back and work with us and help set up the structures so that we can work together and we can respect each other. We must work with these institutions because we need them. We know if they stay outside and attack the government that is not useful.”

He also offered a strong assurance on behalf of the government with regard to their safety. “If they come back, there must be a strong assurance on our part that they won’t come to any harm,” he said, during a meeting with CPJ’s Deputy Director Robert Mahoney and Asia Programme Coordinator, Bob Dietz.

Subsequent to the meeting, CPJ in a statement said: “The Attorney General’s appeal to journalists to return from exile is just a first step. The government must go further by taking concrete action to address the climate of impunity and intimidation that prompted them to flee in the first place.”

Growing population of exiles

While Sri Lanka remains listed among the worst countries for journalists to live in (or in this case, to return to), there had been assurances from the government for them to return home. But promises of safe passage and return are not acceptable to those who have fled, fearing serious reprisals. For them, it is also a question of being able to live without the fear of physical harm and to continue to lead normal lives.

“That’s never going to happen. We are condemned to die away from home, without the opportunity to practice journalism, all because we took stances and defended colleagues and good journalistic practices,” notes Poddala Jayantha.

In exile

Sanath Balasuriya

Poddala Jayantha

Uvindu Kurukulasuriya

Sunanda Deshapriya

Manjula Wediwardhana

Athula Vithanage

Kasun Yapa Karunaratne

Pathmanathan Karunakaran

Udaya Tennakoon

V. Jasiharan

V. Valarmarthi

Tyrell Abeysinghe

Mahanumi Subramanium

Saman Kapila

Buddhika Weerasinghe

Sonali Samarasinghe

Thilak Kodagoda

S. Wjesinghe

Krishnasamy Harendran

Nirusha Canagasabay

Upali Tennakoon

Ajith Herath

Devika Balasuriya

Shermila Yogeshwaran

Chathura Vidyaratne

Nihal Kiriellage

Nilantha Ilangamuwa

Ramesh Subramanium

Keith Noyahr

Anuruddha Lokuhapuarachchi

Prasanna Fonseka

Nandini and Faizal Farik

Rasika Perera

Sandaruwan Senadheera

Navaradnam Kannan

Arumularasa Sabeshwaran

Kanthasami Ethayaparan

Arumaithurai Loheesan

Anthonimuttu Jeyachandra

Gnanasundaram Kuhanathan

K. Kumaradasan

R. Thurairatnam

Gnanasiri Kottigoda

Shantha Wijesooriya

Queen to miss Commonwealth meeting in Sri Lanka

The Queen will not attend this year's Commonwealth summit as the palace reviews her long-haul travel. But there are calls for Britain to boycott the meeting due to Sri Lanka's human rights record.
Queen to miss Commonwealth meeting in Sri Lanka (G)
Channel 4 News
TUESDAY 07 MAY 2013
The Queen has been present at every Commonwealth summit in the last 40 years - a sign of the importance she places on her role at the head of the Commonwealth.
But this year, Prince Charles will take her place at the meeting in Sri Lanka in November after Buckingham Palace said that the number of long-haul flights taken by the 87-year-old monarch was being reviewed.
However Britain is facing pressure to boycott the two-yearly Commonwealth heads of government meeting (CHOGM) altogether, because it is being hosted by the government of Sri Lanka, which is accused of war crimes.
Human rights groups last week criticised David Cameron's decision to attend the summitCanada's government has said it will boycott the meeting, with the country's foreign minister saying that allowing Sri Lanka to host it would be "accommodating evil".
It is nothing to do with the political situation in Sri Lanka.Buckingham Palace
The United Nations says at least 40,000 Tamil civilians were killed by Sri Lankan government forces in the final stages of the civil war which ended four years ago amid evidence of war crimes. The government there has consistently denied its involvement.
In March, two former foreign secretaries – one Labour, one Conservative – told Channel 4 News they thought it would be "grotesque" for the Queen to be required to attend the meeting in a country which is accused of persistent human rights crimes. Human rights campaigners have also expressed concern about the disappearance, torture and murder of government critics.
Buckingham Palace said the Queen's decision not to attend was not a political one. "It is nothing to do with the political situation in Sri Lanka," said a spokesman."The key point here is that the Queen will be represented, although she is not there in person, by the Prince of Wales."
The Queen was forced to cancel her appearance at the Commonwealth Day service in Westminster Abbey in March after a bout of gastroenteritis.

Political pressure

The Global Tamil Forum told Channel 4 News it was "relieved" that the Queen would not be attending. "However Prince Charles and the prime minister seem to be on course to wipe out all the pressure that has been built through the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) process in the last two years," said Suren Surendiran.
Shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander called on the prime minister to review his attendance if certain conditions are not met.
"David Cameron must be clear about the progress Sri Lanka needs to make before he confirms his attendance at November's Commonwealth summit in Colombo.
"He has a responsibility to use the prospect of the summit to encourage Sri Lanka to meet its international obligations and address concerns about ongoing human rights violations."
Downing Street said last week that Mr Cameron would be delivering a "very tough message" to the Sri Lankan government at the meeting.

Queen to miss Commonwealth meeting

Queen Elizabeth II, taken in April 2012BBC7 May 2013 
The Queen is the Commonwealth's symbolic head and has no formal powers over the 54 countries
For the first time since 1973 the Queen will not be attending the Commonwealth heads of government meeting this year, Buckingham Palace has said.
She will be represented by the Prince of Wales at the summit in Sri Lanka in November.
Buckingham Palace said it was reviewing the amount of long-haul travel the Queen undertook.
The Queen, 87, is the head of the Commonwealth and every two years leaders meet to discuss global issues.
The Queen was first present at the Commonwealth heads of government meeting (Chogm) in Ottawa, Canada, in 1973 - missing the first one in 1971 - and has been at every summit since. The last one, in 2011, was held in Perth, Australia.
'Transition'                        Full Story>>>

Queen to miss Commonwealth summit as long haul travel reviewed

Loyalty appThe Queen is set to miss the Commonwealth summit in Sri Lanka, for the first time in 40 years, after Buckingham Palace confirmed it is reviewing the long haul flights taken by the Monarch, who is now 87.

The Queen is set to miss the Commonwealth summit in Sri Lanka, for the first time in 40 years.
The Queen is head of the Commonwealth and (right) Sri Lanka's President Mahinda Rajapaksa Photo: PA/EPA

Full Story>>>