Margaret Thatcher Dies
Former UK Prime Minister Baroness Thatcher has died at 87 following a stroke, her spokesman has said. Baroness Thatcher was Conservative prime minister from 1979 to 1990. She was the first woman to hold the post. Her family is expected to make a further statement later.
Read her maiden speech in the Commons;
PUBLIC BODIES (ADMISSION OF THE PRESS TO MEETINGS) BILL
HC Deb 05 February 1960 vol 616 cc1350-4531350
Order for Second Reading read.
This is a maiden speech, but I know that the constituency of Finchley which I have the honour to represent would not wish me to do other than come straight to the point and address myself to the matter before the House.
I cannot do better than begin by stating the objects of the Bill in the words used by Mr. Arthur Henderson when he introduced the Bill which became the Local Authorities (Admission of the Press to Meetings) Act, 1908, which was also a Private Member’s Measure. He specified the object and purpose as that of guarding the rights of members of the public by enabling the fullest information to be obtained for them in regard to the actions of their representatives upon local authorities.
It is appropriate at this stage to mention that the public does not have a right of admission, either at common law or by statute, to the meetings of local authorities. Members of the public are compelled, therefore, to rely upon the local Press for information on what their elected representatives are doing. The original Measure was brought as a result of a case in which the representatives of a particular paper were excluded from a particular meeting.
The public has the right, in the first instance, to know what its elected representatives are doing. That right extends in a number of directions. I do not know whether hon. Members generally appreciate the total amount of money spent by local authorities. In England and Wales, local authorities spend £1,400 million a year and, in Scotland, just over £200 million a year. Those sums are not insignificant, even in terms of national budgets. Less than half is raised by ratepayers’ money and the rest by taxpayers’ money, and the first purpose in admitting the Press is that we may know how those moneys are being spent. In the second place, I quote from the Report of the Franks Committee:
Publicity is the greatest and most effective check against any arbitrary action.That is one of the fundamental rights of the subject. Further, publicity stimulates the interest of local persons in local government. That is also very important. But if there is a case for publicity, there is also a case for a certain amount of private conference when personal matters are being discussed and when questions are in a preliminary stage. It is in trying to find a point of balance between these two aspects—the public right of knowledge and the necessity on occasion for private conference—that the difficulty arises.
An attempt was made by the 1908 Act to meet this difficulty, and I now turn to the history of the Measure which I am about to present. Provision was made by the 1908 Act for Press representatives to attend meetings of local councils and meetings of education committees in so far as they had delegated powers, and, also a number of other bodies which have now ceased to exist because successive Parliaments have substituted new bodies to carry out the powers which the 1908 Act formerly permitted the Press to publicise.
Long before the events of the past summer, there was a very good case for amending the 1908 Act. The first good case arose when the Local Government Act, 1929, abolished boards of guardians, to whose meetings the Act admitted the Press. Boards of Guardians were responsible for the administration of hospitals and many other matters. The first attempt to bring the law of 1908 up-to-date came in 1930, when the right hon. Member for South Shields (Mr. Ede) introduced a Private Member’s Measure, which I am happy and relieved to learn received a Second Reading. It did not get any further because of a rather precipitate change of Government, which I do not think even the most optimistic hon. Member opposite would believe was imminent at the moment. The case for the Bill then was that boards of guardians no longer existed and the Act needed amending, firstly, by reference to its past performance, and secondly, by reference to the new legislation of 1929.
Surgeon banned by children's hospital in deaths scandal was investigated eight years ago
By JO MACFARLANE and MARTYN HALLE- 6 April 2013
Surgeon banned by children's hospital in deaths scandal was investigated eight years ago
A surgeon banned from operating at a children’s heart unit at the centre of a scandal over high death rates was previously investigated over his practice.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2305173/Surgeon-banned-childrens-hospital-deaths-scandal-investigated-years-ago.html#ixzz2Pt2AB3Cn
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
By JO MACFARLANE and MARTYN HALLE- 6 April 2013
Surgeon banned by children's hospital in deaths scandal was investigated eight years ago
- Dr Nihal Weerasena stopped carrying out procedures at Leeds General Infirmary two weeks ago
- Bosses are investigating concerns over his abilities
- Dr Weerasena also stood aside in 2005 after hospital identified problems
Sri Lankan-born Nihal Weerasena is the doctor who agreed to stop carrying out operations at Leeds General Infirmary two weeks ago while bosses investigated concerns over his abilities.
But Dr Weerasena also previously stood aside in 2005 after the hospital identified problems relating to a procedure he was carrying out to repair a congenital heart defect.
Suspended: Nihal Weerasena has agreed to stop carrying out procedures at Leeds General Infirmary while bosses investigate concerns over his abilities
Scandal: The unit at Leeds General Infirmary is set reopen next week if hospital chiefs can convince NHS officials there are no safety concerns
The hospital, which then had concerns over Dr Weerasena’s success rates with the procedure, asked the Royal College of Surgeons to carry out a review of his practice.
Dr Weerasena, 59, no longer carries out the specific procedure at the hospital but has been allowed to remain part of the paediatric cardiac surgery team at Leeds.
His latest suspension was revealed by The Mail on Sunday two weeks ago but the hospital has refused to confirm his identity – even though he stepped aside just before all surgery was halted at the unit over fears the death rate was twice the national average. The unit is set to reopen next week if hospital chiefs can convince NHS officials that there are no safety concerns.
One mother is demanding a fresh investigation into her seven-year-old daughter’s death after learning of the concerns raised about Dr Weerasena.
Mrs Burton, 39, a civil servant from York, lost Eve – her only child – after a third operation for a congenital heart condition in March last year which was carried out by the surgeon.
Tragic: Mrs Burton's lost her seven-year-old daughter Eve after her third operation on a heart condition
Eve had an initial operation in 2005 at just ten weeks old to insert a donor artery, and needed regular follow-ups and further surgery as she grew. A second operation in December 2009 was also a success. Neither operation involved the procedure that had been investigated by the Royal College of Surgeons and neither involved Dr Weerasena.
However, he did carry out the third operation last year when Eve died hours after a procedure to replace her artery led to the failure of a heart valve.
Mrs Burton said: ‘I knew the surgery would be risky but it certainly wasn’t spelled out that she might not make it. I did ask Dr Weerasena for the success rates of the operation and he told me he was unable to do so.
‘I kissed Eve and told her I would see her later. But after being in surgery all day, he came out and told me there had been complications and a heart valve had burst under the pressure.’
Mrs Burton held several meetings with Dr Weerasena but says she still does not understand why her daughter died.
Dr Weerasena trained at the University of Rajasthan in India and qualified in 1978. He has been working at Leeds General Infirmary for more than ten years.
Asked if he was the surgeon who had been suspended, he said: ‘You need to speak to the trust.’
A spokesman for Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust refused to confirm the surgeon’s identity. However, he added: ‘The reason the surgeon stopped working was nothing to do with mortality rates or children’s heart surgery.’
Commenting on the 2005 investigation, the trust said its findings were implemented in full and the surgeon voluntarily decided not to undertake the particular procedure in future.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2305173/Surgeon-banned-childrens-hospital-deaths-scandal-investigated-years-ago.html#ixzz2Pt2AB3Cn
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook