Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, March 27, 2013


Sustaining Change In Myanmar


Colombo TelegraphBy R Hariharan -March 27, 2013
Col. (retd) R.Hariharan
Strategic context of change
Myanmar is in the throes of change since 2010 after the first-ever multi-party election was held after two decades. President Thein Sein has surprised all the stakeholders by the speed with which he is  transforming the government from an insensitive military dictatorship to a democratic rule of sorts, despite the limitations imposed by the Constitution 2008. As a result Myanmar has become the focus of international attention and even approval.
Geographically located on the eastern borders of India, and on the South and Southeast of China, Myanmar’s strategic value for two most populated nations of the world is immense. This is further enhanced with the impending completion of two infrastructure projects linking Myanmar with China and India. The China-funded Kyakpu port project with road link and gas and oil pipelines to Yunnan in China is likely to be completed in the next few months. This would provide China a direct strategic access to the Indian Ocean by passing the choke point at Malacca Strait. Apart from security implications, it would make Chinese exports to the under exploited South Asian market more competitive, while helping the development of Yunnan province.
Similarly India’s Kaladan multi modal project providing easier road and river access for India’s troubled Northeast to Sittwe port in Myanmar is expected to be completed in May 2014. This link could act as a catalyst for the development of Northeastern states of India as it would open a direct route for India’s trade with Myanmar and the rest of ASEAN. In tandem with China’s direct access through Kyakpu, Sino-Indian trade will have greater opportunities to flourish. And we can expect China to enlarge its foot print further in South Asia.
China’s increasing belligerence in East and South China seas has become a cause for concern for Japan and its close ally the U.S.  It threatens to destabilize the U.S.’s dominance in East Asia and longstanding strategic equation with Japan, South Korea and Philippines. China’s contentious territorial claims on South China Sea have become louder.  To contain this development, the U.S. has been trying to enlarge its strategic periphery from Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific. As a key geostrategic entity in this region, Myanmar is well on its way to become a focus nation of the U.S., shedding its out caste status of earlier years.
During the last three decades, China had carefully cultivated Mynamar’s military junta by providing vital economic and political help to soften the crippling effect of international sanctions imposed upon the country after the military refused to hand over power to the democratically elected civilian government in 1990.  China chose to ignore the struggle for restoration of democracy by the National League for Democracy (NLD) under the leadership of Ms Aung San Suu Kyi. Although India and ASEAN countries did not observe the sanctions and built their own links with the military regime, it is Chinese influence that predominates in Myanmar, particularly in the armed forces, infrastructure, mining and trade and commerce.
The cosy relationship China had built over the years in Myanmar is under threat now. Sustained international pressures and support to Ms Suu Kyi’s campaign spearheaded by the U.S. ultimately compelled the military regime to come out with the 2008 Constitution which gives limited democracy to the people. China had no option but to go along with the international community on the democratic reforms in keeping with its growing international profile.
Ever since the civilian government came to power and started taking up political, economic and structural reforms process, the U.S. has started rebuilding its relations with Myanmar. As a result the U.S. sanctions are progressively being lifted to facilitate greater opportunities for U.S. business in Myanmar.  President Obama’s visit in November 2012 came perhaps as the final recognition of  President Thein’s earnest effort in the democratic exercise. As increasing U.S. presence in Myanmar is eating into the Chinese sphere of influence, it has become a matter of concern to China. Chinese media had been lamenting the failure of its policy makers to cultivate the democratic constituency in Myanmar.
Though Chinese are trying to repair their relationship with leaders like Ms Suu Kyi, in the amorphous state of politics in the country it will be quite some time for results to emerge. However, China as a neighbour with enormous economic and military power will continue to enjoy  wide spread influence in Myanmar for some time to come. However, China would always be on watching with extra attention the U.S. initiatives in Myanmar in the context of regional security and trading regimes. This would become even more important when Myanmar  assumes the chairmanship of ASEAN in 2014.
Unlike China, India’s relationship had been more laid back. However, Myanmar’s historical cultural and religious experience and shared colonial history with India makes Myanmar more comfortable in dealing with Indians. India’s presence as a friendly and powerful neighbor enables Myanmar to somewhat balance China’s overwhelming influence. This could become a potential game changer as and when India-U.S. strategic relationship grows. Indian efforts to enlarge its economic and strategic relationship are not on the same league as China.
However, given the entrepreneurial spirit of Indians which is second only to the Chinese, we can expect it to grow more rapidly in the coming years. Indian leadership of all political hues is aware of the importance of Myanmar in India’s overall strategic spectrum. And as democracy comes to stay in Myanmar its equation with India is likely to make rapid progress.
Myanmar’s ability of to sustain political and economic changes now underway has to be viewed in this overall strategic context.
Political changes                             Read More


Gratiaen Shortlist Announced


March 27, 2013 |
Colombo TelegraphCelebrating 20 years of recognizing and awarding the best work in English by resident Sri Lankan writers the Gratiaen Prize opened awards season with the announcement of its 2012 shortlist at Park Street Mews on Friday 22 March 2013.
The five works of literature selected by the judges are:
It’s not in the Stars by Rizvina Morseth de Alwis. This unpublished novel was described by the judges as an insightful rendering of the distressing impact the seminal events of contemporary Sri Lanka have had on its many ethnic and religious communities.
Kalumaali by Ruwanthie de Chickera and Nadie Kammallaweera. In the judges’ view this unpublished drama script is an innovatively structured play which works at the level of magical story for children and as powerful theatre for adults exploring the identity crisis of a working woman and a mother.
Playing Pillow Politics at MGK by Lal Medawattegedera. This unpublished novel was described as a thematically and formally innovative work mixing realism with the allegorical. It provides a daring perspective on contemporary urban, social and political realities.
Open Words are for Love-Letting by Malinda Seneviratne. This published poetry collection was seen by the judges as an engaging collection of poetry that demonstrates poetry as a word-scape, patterns of tone and images of sound.
The Professional by Saroj Sinnetamby. This unpublished novel was described as a highly engrossing, imaginatively presented novel, focusing on the hard choices confronting down-at-heel migrants from mainly the Third World in the impersonal ‘Big Cities’ of the First World.
The judges explained that the submissions this year were very strong and that while it was difficult to limit the shortlist to five works of literature, their ultimate decision was unanimous. The judging panel consists of: Jayantha Dhanapala (Chair), a distinguished former career diplomat and currently President of the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs; Lynn Ockersz, a senior journalist, a published poet and a lecturer in journalism; and Sumathy Sivamohan, a writer, dramatist, filmmaker and academic who is currently head of the Department of English at the University of Peradeniya. For further information on the judges and past winners with extracts of their work, see www.gratiaen.com.
When the Gratiaen Prize was instituted two decades ago by Michael Ondaatje, Sri Lankan writing in English had already begun to gain a global profile but this was almost exclusively by writers domiciled outside Sri Lanka. In the ensuing years a number of Sri Lanka-based writers, recognized by the Gratiaen, achieved critical and popular success regionally and internationally. The first winner, Carl Muller was published by Penguin India, Elmo Jayawardene by Marshall and Cavendish in Singapore and poets such as Vivimarie VanderPoorten and dramatists/film makers such as Ruwanthie de Chickera and Viskesa Chandrasekaram have produced and performed internationally, with perhaps the most iconic “Gratiaen success” being achieved by Shehan Karunatilaka for his Chinaman which won both the  DSC Prize for South Asian Literature and the Commonwealth Book Prize in addition to being published by Random House India and Jonathan Cape, UK.

#unlk: Archive and visualisation of tweets on Sri Lanka at HRC’s 22nd Session

27 Mar, 2013
Click to download app from Apple iTunesThe 22nd regular session of the Human Rights Council was held from 25 February to 22 March 2013 at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland.
As Groundviews did with conversations on Twitter over Sri Lanka during the UPR sessions last yearwe archived every single tweet from Thursday, 21st February 2013 to Tuesday, 26th March 2013 with the #unlk hashtag.
After tossing around several options for a good hashtag over email, #unlk was circulated globally by leading websites, activists, local and international HR organisations, journalists and others before the start of the HRC’s 22nd Session, to facilitate the creation of this archive.
We used Martin Hawskey’s new TAGS v5 template with Twitter’s Developer API and Google Docs to archive every single #unlk tweet.
There are 6056 tweets in the archive, which include retweets as well.
The peaks correspond to the times and dates which either the #unlk hashtag was promoted globally as a means to capture conversations around sri Lanka at the HRC, when a Government representative was speaking at the sessions in Geneva and when Sri Lanka was being discussed at the Sessions or during a side event. The final peak is around the time the US Resolution was taken up for voting at the HRC.
Top tweeters during the time #unlk was active are shown below.
Download the archive as an Excel spreadsheet here.
A completely searchable archive of the tweets, hosted online, can be accessed here or by clicking the image below.
Screen Shot 2013-03-27 at 11.00.11 AM
A data visualisation of the 6,000+ tweets can be viewed here, or by clicking the image below. Be warned - given the size of the archive, the visualisation will consume a lot of CPU and memory resources. Opening this on anything other than a very powerful PC or Mac with lots of RAM will possibly crash your browser.
Screen Shot 2013-03-27 at 11.05.38 AM

Sri Lanka’s Defeat

By Kath Noble -March 26, 2013 
Kath Noble
Colombo TelegraphThe UN Human Rights Council sessions ended last week with the passage of another resolution on Sri Lanka. It was a victory for the United States, which secured 25 votes in favour compared to 13 against, with eight abstentions and the representative from Gabon being recorded as AWOL.
Life having continued as normal in Colombo, the Government is bound to learn all the wrong lessons from the experience.
For a start, it will think that it can continue to allow the Bodu Bala Sena to run around inciting hatred against Muslims, since Muslim countries overwhelmingly backed Sri Lanka. Half of the votes the Sri Lankan delegation could muster were from Muslim countries – Pakistan, the Maldives, Indonesia, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Mauritania – as well as half of the abstentions. Only Libya and Sierra Leone – both recent ‘beneficiaries’ of Western military intervention – voted with the United States.
The Bodu Bala Sena, which is entirely comprised of people who consider any comment on what goes on in Sri Lanka by non-Sri Lankans as tantamount to an invasion, will pretend that it hasn’t noticed. Since it claims not to notice much more obvious things – such as that Sinhalese not only aren’t in danger of being wiped out but are actually increasing their share of the population in Sri Lanka, even without the help of retrograde bans on contraception – this should come as no surprise. Noticing the voting pattern in Geneva would make it difficult to continue with its ridiculous and totally destructive campaign, and that would mean going back to obscurity.
Unfortunately, the Government is not much more intelligent.
Muslim countries may not choose to express their concern via the Human Rights Council – or not yet, anyway – but they are certainly worried. They said as much in a very carefully worded letter to the Government just days before the vote in Geneva.
Mahinda Rajapaksa must take note, before Sri Lanka is completely isolated internationally.
Dayan Jayatilleka‘s new book – ‘Long War, Cold Peace’, launched in Colombo at the weekend – is a timely reminder of why international isolation is not just the Government’s problem.
As he puts it,
When the war ended in May 2009, the Eelam movement was more globalised than ever. The struggle between Sri Lanka and the Tamil separatist project would continue in the global arena, on an international scale, and the country’s future in the next stage would be greatly influenced if not decisively determined in the international theatre. This included the preservation of the military gains on the ground. There had to be a shift of national emphasis and priority, to the international front. Just as the country and state matured to the point where it shifted to the correct policy stance on the war, overhauled its military machine and placed the right personnel in the right places, the same or a similar task would have to be undertaken in the domain of Sri Lanka’s external relations.
Separatism would have been dead and buried if Mahinda Rajapaksa had done what he promised and followed the military defeat of the LTTE with a generous political settlement. But he chose to delay, if not drop the idea altogether.
As a result, Sri Lanka is in trouble.
Anybody who doubts it should ask themselves how else there could once again be self-immolations taking place in Tamil Nadu.
Protesters haven’t only just heard allegations of war crimes. They were made even while the fighting was taking place, and a call for an international investigation was included in the resolution that the European Union wanted to pass in the Special Session of the Human Rights Council on Sri Lanka in May 2009. What has changed is the global consensus on what to do about them.
The Government no longer occupies what Dayan calls the ‘moral high ground’.
During and immediately after the conflict, the world compared its actions to those of the LTTE and took decisions accordingly. It got away with a lot because it was up against a ruthless terrorist organisation that killed both Tamils and Sinhalese, ordinary villagers, human rights activists and political leaders as well as members of the armed forces, and in particular also the leaders of other countries.
With the annihilation of the LTTE, the Government ran out of excuses. Globally, the consensus is that it is not living up to expectations.
This is what last week’s vote in Geneva confirmed.
The Government will no doubt be tempted to treat it very lightly, since it is the second resolution that the United States has succeeded in passing on Sri Lanka.
Indeed, the only difference is the result of changes in the composition of the Human Rights Council. In 2012, 24 countries voted in favour compared to 15 against, with eight abstentions. This became 25 in favour and 13 against in 2013, with eight abstentions and the absence of Gabon. Meanwhile, Russia and China had left the Human Rights Council, while in the Eastern Europe group two small actual or aspiring members of the European Union had joined, and Japan and South Korea had joined the Asian group.
It was on the first occasion that Mahinda Rajapaksa should have understood the need for a change of approach.
That is when the major shift took place. The Sri Lankan delegation had secured 29 votes in favour compared to 12 against, with six abstentions, in the Special Session of May 2009.
The tendency in Sri Lanka is to focus on the role of India, which played such a crucial role in support of the Government at the May 2009 Special Session, only to vote with the United States in 2012. Indeed, India is the most important single country for Sri Lanka’s external relations, as its only neighbour and the regional superpower with such long-standing ties in so many fields. However, India was but one of many countries that deserted the Government in 2012.
Crucially, the majority of both the Latin American group and the African group joined India in siding with the West.
What needs to be done to recover this natural constituency is as usual best summed up by Dayan Jayatilleka:
No one, even among Sri Lanka’s friends, would countenance either an insensitive or slow alleviation of the problems of IDPs and related humanitarian questions or an absence of an immediately post-war political solution based on autonomy and equality for the Tamil people. The lesson was that the Sri Lankan state had to catch up, get with the new calendar and new times, and learn to speak a new language. ‘Bush-speak’ had no acceptance outside the USA even during his administration and now it is rejected within the USA itself and has no resonance anywhere in the world. Sri Lanka’s dominant discourse had to change or it would lose the global struggle by simple default. With the victory of Obama, macho nationalism, religious majoritarianism, unilateralism and ‘anything goes in the struggle against terrorism’ were out. The attempt to combine ethics and power (‘ethical realism’) was in.
Looking at what has happened since then, it would appear that the experience had the opposite effect on Mahinda Rajapaksa. The Government has moved more recklessly than ever in exactly the same direction.
If Muslim countries were to abandon Sri Lanka, the descent into hell would surely be even further accelerated.
A notable feature of this year’s sessions of the UN Human Rights Council was the emergence of a number of pressure groups within the country. For example, there were media events by an organisation claiming to be working on behalf of relatives of the disappeared, which focused on disappearances carried out by the LTTE. There was also a major demonstration in support of the Government in Jaffna. Whether these efforts are genuine or managed is not the point – they show what lies ahead. Before long somebody is bound to call for an investigation into the war crimes of the IPKF.
Such initiatives are very much part of normal life in Colombo.
That too is a defeat for Sri Lanka, which should now be focusing all of its attention on rebuilding the country, both physically and psychologically.
*Kath Noble’s column may be accessed online at http://kathnoble.wordpress.com/. She may be contacted atkathnoble99@gmail.com.

Arundhika tries to score points with Gota

Tuesday, 26 March 2013 
Parliamentarian Arundhika Fernando whose name has been associated with importing a stock of ethanol spirit illegally has started to breakdown several business establishments in the Dankotuwa area without any approval from the Road Development Authority (RDA) or Urban Development Authority (UDA). Fernando’s involvement in importing ethanol spirit has been noted by the Defence Secretary and the Bodhu Bala Sena.
Although the businessmen have asked for an official notice to breakdown their shops, Fernando and his lackeys have taken a backhoe and razed the shops to the ground.
SLFP Puttalam District Leader, Minister Milroy Fernando had tried to intervene to provide some relief to the businessmen, but Arundhika Fernando had bulldozed the buildings abusing his powers, people from the area said.
When the businessmen have asked for compensation, Arundhika Fernando has said that the shop owners had to break down their own shops and that compensation would be paid later.
The businessmen however say that they do not have faith in getting any compensation payment once the buildings are razed to the ground. It is only the UDA that has the mandate to raze buildings to the ground.
SLFPers say that the power clash between MP Arundhika Fernando and Minister Milroy Fernando has resulted in Arundhika trying to show his powers in this manner.
The President appointed Arundhika Fenrando as a co-organizer of Milroy Fernando’s electorate. Milroy Fernando is a senior member of parliament who has been represented in parliament since 1989.
A special presidential investigation has been initiated into the breaking down of shops following a complaint made by Minister Milroy Fernando.

BBC World Service Broadcasts In Sri Lanka On SLBC Suspended

By Colombo Telegraph -March 26, 2013 
Colombo TelegraphThe BBC’s World Service Director, Peter Horrocks, today announced the suspension of BBC broadcasts on SLBC (the Sri Lankan Broadcasting Corporation) following continued interruption and interference of BBC Tamil programming on SLBC.
Peter Horrocks, Director, BBC World Service
Peter Horrocks said: “We regret the disruption in service to our loyal audiences in Sri Lanka, but such targeted interference in our programmes is a serious breach of trust with those audiences, which the BBC cannot allow. We spoke to SLBC last week about interference that took place on 16-18 March and warned them they were in breach of their broadcasting agreement. Further disruption on Monday 25 March has left the BBC with no alternative but to suspend the service with immediate effect. If the SLBC have specific complaints about any BBC output they should take them up with us, as we have invited them to do, and not interfere directly with broadcasts in ways that are unacceptable to the BBC and misleading to our audiences.”
The BBC took similar action in 2009 when its services were also disrupted. Audiences in Sri Lanka can continue to listen to the BBC on Shortwave and via our online services.
BBC Tamil
  • 25 meterband (11965 kHz)
  • 31 meterband (9855 kHz)
  • 49 meterband (6135 kHz)
  • 41 meterband (7600 kHz)
BBC Sinhalese
  • 49 meterband (6135 kHz)
  • 31 meterband (9615 kHz)
  • 41 meterband (7699 kHz)
BBC World Service English content is broadcast on SLBC at GMT – 0300 to 0430; 1130 to 1230 and 1330 to 1430 (all GMT)
And via websites:
bbc.com/news
bbc.co.uk/tamil/
bbc.co.uk/sinhala/
BBC Press Release
Gota has to be worshipped even to secure Dual citizenship
(Lanka-e-News- 26.March.2013,9.30PM) A new Board has been appointed in regard to those Sri Lankans who are abroad seeking dual citizenship. The most curious feature of this Board is, while dual citizenship is a matter coming under the purview of the Foreign Ministry and the Ministry of internal affairs , this new Board’s chief is Gotabaya Rajapakse , the defense Ministry secretary.

When the ruling regime head MaRa went to London in the first half of last year , he had to confront severe protests staged against him by the Tamils there .After his return, to wreak revenge on those Tamils , the issue of dual citizenship was stopped. At that time , over 2000 persons had applied for dual citizenship , which has now snowballed to 4000, according to reports.

All preparations have been made to tighten the laws enacted in 1987 on the granting of dual citizenships . Under the new enactment , the applicant for dual citizenship should have a face to face interview with the Board under Gotabaya. If a Sri Lankan had been abroad for 5 years continuously , he loses his citizenship and has to make a fresh application to obtain SL citizenship.

The Rajapakse regime that is notorious for being policy less , rudderless and aimless is while solicitously inviting the Sri Lankans abroad to invest here is at the same time digging the grave for them by introducing new laws against those who are getting ready to come here and invest.

The cruelest irony is , the chief of this Board deciding on this dual citizenship is Gotabaya Rajapakse who fled the country in fear in the thick of the war and remained in America for 16 continuous years even without as much as sparing a thought for his motherland. If the new law applies retrospectively , he should be the first to lose his SL citizenship ., leave alone his treacherous and traitorous act of fleeing the country when as an army personnel he should have remained in the country and fought to the last for his motherland.

Hence appointment of Gotabaya Rajapakse as the chief of the Board is the most contemptible and ridiculous appointment made by this equally topsy turvy regime.

UK travel advice maintains concerns on Lanka
[ Wednesday, 27 March 2013, 02:44.49 AM GMT +05:30 ]
The latest travel advice on Sri Lanka issued by the British Foreign and Commonwealth office, maintains that the end of the military conflict in May 2009 has seen an upsurge of nationalism in Sri Lanka. 
It says as a result, anti-Western (particularly anti-British) rhetoric has increased and this has led to violent protests against the British High Commission and other diplomatic premises.
“Although no protests have so far been directed at the British community more generally, you should be vigilant and avoid demonstrations,” the travel advice, updated this month, has said.
The Sri Lankan government had last September raised concerns with the British government over the travel advice and urged them to amend it..
The Sri Lankan government had initially raised its concerns with the British High Commission in Colombo over the travel advice when it was first released in August.
However the issue went unattended as the travel advice was released with amendments days later but with the same controversial notes.
Tourism industry officials in Sri Lanka had raised concerns over the impact the travel advice may have on British tourists visiting Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka is expecting more tourist arrivals from Britain next year with British Airways resuming flights to Colombo this month.
The latest updated travel advice also says that there is an underlying threat from terrorism in Sri Lanka.
It says that although the LTTE suffered a military defeat in May 2009, the Government maintains extensive anti-terrorism powers and increased security measures including checkpoints and a highly visible military presence remains throughout the country.
It also says that organised and armed gangs are known to operate in Sri Lanka and have been responsible for targeted kidnappings and violence. While there is no evidence to suggest that British nationals are at particular risk, the travel advice says gangs have been known to frequent tourist areas.
The updated travel advice says a majority of visits to Sri Lanka are incident free, although there are an increasing number of incidents of credit card fraud, road accidents and drownings.

Do Democracies Throw Up Clowns?

By Charitha Ratwatte -March 26, 2013 |
Charitha Ratwatte
Colombo TelegraphItaly had an election recently. Germany too. Within Europe, Germany has been playing the aggressive Big Brother and trying to impose some welcome fiscal discipline on nations which are dragging down the European economy with their welfare largesse, like Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy.
After the Italian election results were announced, Peer Steinbrink, candidate of the centre left Social Democratic party for the post of Chancellor in Germany, mocked the outcome of the Italian election. He declared himself ‘rather appalled that two CLOWNS had won’. The remark was obvious reference to Beppe Grillo, a comedian turned politician who founded the anti-establishment Five Star Movement.
Who was the other clown? Steinbruck clarified by referring to ‘a clown with a testosterone boost’. He added: “My impression is that two populist clowns have won.” This definitely fixes the identity of the second clown as Italy’s former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, leader of the People of Freedom Movement; he presided over a decade of economic stagnation and his fainthearted response to the euro crisis brought Europe to the brink of collapse.
Berlusconi is famed for his infamous Bunga-Bunga parties, with pretty scantily dressed starlets performing pole dances, among other things, it is said. He is accused of paying for sex to an underage Moroccan girl. After the German politician’s comment was made, Italy’s President Giorgio Napolitano cancelled a dinner engagement with Steinbruck.
Clown comparison
A recent magazine article compare the two clowns as follows: Grillo – won 22% of the popular Italian vote. His is the single largest party in Parliament. Age 64. Profession – stand-up comic. Economic novice. His party’s official line is that all Italian politicians are crooks. He will suspend Italy’s national debt payments to creditors who bailed Italy out of the economic crisis. On the other hand, Silvio Berlusconi, excluding the recent hair transplant on his otherwise bald pate, is 74 years old, won 30% of the vote – economic policies when in office were a tragedy for Italy, divorced and with a reputation for dalliances with pretty women. Might end up in jail on a number of cases relating to the abuse of power.
Berlusconi is also accused of violating secrecy laws by leaking privileged information to the newspaper he owns – Il Giornale. The leaks were about the attempted takeover of BNL bank by insurance giant Unipol. Berlusconi faces two more verdicts from the Italian courts for tax fraud and as earlier mentioned for having sex with an underage minor and paying her. Presently taking refuge in a Milan hospital, hounded by the courts, Berlusconi is plotting his next move, which may result in Italy facing another election soon. The Court sent its own doctors to check Berlusconi’s health, a supposed eye infection; the Court’s doctors ruled that Berlusconi was in fact fit enough to attend Court!
Beppe Grillo, the comedian and fulminating satirist, has won more votes than any other politician at the election. There is an old saying that that in most countries, the political situation is serious but not desperate. The presence of clowns in Italy turns this adage n its head. The situation in Italy is desperate, but due to the presence of these ‘clowns’ it is not serious!
Grillo campaigned for the election by touring the country in a camper van, swam the Straits of Messina and used the internet as an electronic platform for communication. He used this to counter Berlusconi’s huge multimedia arsenal, which is used by Berlusconi’s party with great effect. Grillo has an appeal to the average Italian voter, as one of them, an ordinary sort of guy – he gets angry while speaking, he swears , he jokes. He whips the crowds in the plazas into a kind of hysteria with his flamboyant oratory.
Grillo has relentlessly campaigned for a clean Parliament purged of those with criminal records. Commentators say that Grillo the comedian has learnt from one-time Italian political leader Umberto Bossi that Italians favour warm leaders who turns the air into rancorous colours with hysterical rhetoric and regularly performs the ‘umbrella gesture’ – smashing a flat palm into the inside of the elbow – a very Mediterranean expressive gesture. Grillo the populist with a wild uncontrollable main of hair, a booming voice and untucked untidy shirts, now holds the fate of Italy and according to some analysts the fate of Europe in these comedians’ hands.
Grillo refers to Berlusconi – the other clown, as defined by the German politician – as ‘that psycho dwarf’. Grillo has refused to negotiate with the leader of the centre left democratic part Pier Luigi Bersani, to form a coalition, calling him a ‘dead man walking’! He called Italy’s former technocrat Prime Minster Mario Monti – Mario Mortis! Grillo has said forming a coalition would be similar to Napoleon cutting a deal with Wellington!
Barefoot and wearing faded jeans and a greasy T-shirt with an image of Gandhi on it , Grillo was recently shown on television saying that his goal for Italy was to do away with a system that had ‘disintegrated the country and build something new which would transform Italy into a real participatory democracy’. He said: “We can change everything in the hands of respectable people, but the existing political class must be expelled immediately.”
Grillo: New type of politician
Grillo the comedian exemplifies a new type of politician emerging from the Europe’s long-festering economic crisis and mounting voter discontent. In Greece there is Alexis Tsipras, who came from nowhere to lead an anti-austerity drive and heads the second largest Parliamentary party, and Tair Lapid of Israel, who tapped into a wave of national frustration with deep social inequality and rose to prominence. These are reformists.
Grillo also tapped into the frustration to by promoting his Five Star Movement into an anti-establishment force to contend with. Despite being barred from Italian television in the 1980s for mocking corrupt politicians, Grillo has gathered a humongous following by using the power of the internet and social media.
When he started a political blog in 2005, Italians logged in by the millions to engage in debating hot political issues. Soon the candidates put up by Five Star, nicknamed the ‘Grillini’ by the press, began making a mark at local elections. Their manifesto was populist – improving public water quality, transportation, internet connectivity and cleaning up the environment.
The Grillini, mostly young professionals, post videos and profiles of themselves on Grillo’s blog and then are selected through an online vote. Ethical standards are strict; those with criminal records and previous political affiliations are eliminated. Not using official cars and other perquisites of office is compulsory. They have to quit office after two years (term limits) and are allowed to keep only a small percentage of the salary they get as an elected representative. The rest goes into a fund to support small and medium businesses to expand.
Five Star pre-election promises include many lavish promises, such as giving a ‘citizenship wage’ to all Italians. But how they are going to raise the money is not disclosed, except for some vague utterances to cut the cost of government. They want to scrap the public funding of political parties, a two-year term limit for elected officials, more use of renewable energy and energy saving measures, more dedicated bicycle lanes, free internet access, assessment of university lecturers by their students, abolition of stock options, limits of the salaries of senior executives, scrapping the proposed high speed rail link between Italy and France, wider use of generic drugs, and the wildly popular and revolutionary proposal to limit the pay of elected representatives to average national wage! Five Stars got a quarter of the votes on this classically populist platform.
At the local level, Five Star has proved its ability. They took over the local government in Parma, which was broke, they refinanced the debt and rammed through spending cuts. Grillo is on record wanting a referendum on whether Italy should default on its huge debts and leave the euro zone. Analysts say that Grillo has successfully harvested the Italian protest vote.
A spokesman for Confindustria, the business bosses club, says: “The scandals, the serious economic crisis faced by the country and the failure of the state to modernise and become more efficient, all contribute to a powerful sense of disillusionment and feeling of disorientation.”
The people feel neglected by the state. Grillo is tapping into the young upper middle class electros with professional qualifications, who are sick of Italy’s corrupt crony politicians. A comic’s ability to combine anger and humour works politically, Italy has shown. They make unconventional proposals to the frustrated electorate that subverts the pomposity of the traditional political class, whom the average voter has come to detest. Even in Iceland, where the economy was devastated by a financial crisis, the voters elected a stand up comic as mayor of the capital city Reykjavik. Jon Gnarr’s pledges included a drug-free Parliament within a decade!

Hugo Chavez
Hugo Chavez, the former President of Venezuela, elected democratically but soon turned autocratic, succumbed to cancer a few weeks ago, after unsuccessful treatment in Cuba, on 8 March. Rory Carroll has written a biography entitled ‘Commandante: Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela’. Carroll was reporting for the London Guardian newspaper in Caracas and according to a reviewer he has collected snippets about Chavez’s rule in Venezuela that he has woven into compelling story that comes close to answering the riddle of Chavez, an autocrat, a self-proclaimed champion of his country’s poor and a clown!
A post-oil boom decay had set in Venezuela towards the end of Chavez’s rule; even in the Miraflores presidential palace, water leaked into the President’s private lift, due to inefficient maintenance. Chavez did many clownish things – like enacting legislation to make the horse on Venezuela’s coat of arm face left, to symbolise socialism and his solidarity with Castro’s Cuba, which at the same time was slowly unshackling the economically-crippling bonds of socialism under Fidel Castro’s pragmatic brother president Raul Castro.
Chavez in another clownish move one day decided that there was too much red, the colour of socialism, around and started wearing yellow! Causing panic among his flunkeys who were caught wrong-footed in their socialist reds! Chavez had a weekly live television program called ‘Alo Presidente’ on which orders were given and opponents denounced. When the Opposition surprisingly won the mayor’s election in Caracas, Chavez created a new capital district which took over the mayor’s powers and put a socialist crony in charge. When faced with a problem Chavez fired the minster in charge or created a new ministry. In 10 years he ran through 180 ministers!
Venezuela was inflicted with crumbling bridges, thieving politicians, uncontrolled inflation and high crime rates, due to Chavez’s clownish rule. One of the best quotes in Carroll’s book is from a producer of Alo Presidente, who recounted how “Chavez chose locations, camera angles, themes, guests and nobody ever dared to contradict him. People would call in, but it became like a lottery, everyone looking to get a job, a house or something. That’s no way to run a country.”
Among mourners at his funeral were autocrats: Raul Castro of Cuba, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran and Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus. Reports indicate that Ahmadinejad is in trouble with Islamic clerics in Iran, over a ‘sinful hug,’ given while condoling with Chavez’s mother.
Irresponsible populists
Democratic politics has always thrown up such irresponsible populists as leaders, who make wild promises to the electorate, which will cause financial ruin to the national economy. Unaffordable giveaways, freebies and economically-disastrous policies attract poor and marginalised voters.
We have seen it in Sri Lanka over and over again: ‘Sinhala Only’ in 24 hours, eight pounds of cereals free, free rice from the moon, a grant of Rs. 25,000 for every poor household, peace in 24 hours, waiving housing loan and farmer instalments, etc.
We also find populist politicians making vicious attacks on public officers who have to responsibly manage public finances, against senior government officers whose right of reply is restricted by the provisions of the Administrative Regulations and the Establishment Code. Tax money is wasted on ventures for politicians’ personal glory, which cannot ever pay a return.
There are many such other clownish acts, which cause frustration and anger among taxpayers, public administrators and voters. When a majority of the voting public is dependent on government handouts and largesse, the opportunity for irresponsible populists to make wild promises presents itself.
In fact, one-time Prime Minister of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew once argued that the principle of one person one vote should be reconsidered and that wealth creators, those who pay income taxes to government revenue, should be given an extra vote, compared to pensioners, government employees, and social welfare recipients who receive their sustenance from taxpayers’ money, who can be swayed with wild promises of largesse.
In Singapore, where the majority of citizens live in State-provided apartments for which they are on a subsidised rent purchase scheme, an Opposition politician bent on taking power at any cost can offer to waive the repayment of housing loans. In the same way, they can promise to raise pensions, government salaries and social welfare payments to unaffordable levels. The national budget deficit will go through the ceiling. The nation will end up living on borrowed money and having to raise fresh loans to settle earlier loans – like some international Ponzi scheme!
This is why issues like fiscal responsibility are legislated, placing limits on deficit budgeting, and a politically independent and autonomous central bank to limit the creation of artificial money is put in place. When these safeguard are whittled away, the clowns take over.
Expensive democracy
One commentator has expressed the view that democracy is a very an expensive process of selecting a country’s political leaders. The common people are in fact only given the choice of electing the candidates put forward by the country’s dominant and powerful vested interests. Democracy sounds wonderful as it gives the common people the illusion of thinking that they have the freedom to choose whoever is going to lead them.
In fact candidates are preselected by the dominant vested interests, and whoever wins is there to ensure that the policies favourable to the kingmaker’s vested interests are implemented. These vested interest include, race, caste, tribe, religion, money, land owners, tycoons, you name it – they are there. In theory winning candidates should be answerable to the people who elect them. But in reality they owe their loyalty and allegiance to the group who made it possible for them to join the race, which provided the money.
Considering that running for office is very costly and mostly beyond the legal means of most candidates, the commentator deduces the criteria behind the selection of candidates in a democracy: They have to be good talkers and liars, to sway over diverse people with flamboyant verbosity. They have to be rather short on intelligence, otherwise they will, once elected, betray the interest group that sponsored and funded them and actually do the right thing! They have to be presentable. Even if someone is endowed with supreme intelligence and righteous patriotic inclinations but lacks the ability to speak loudly or does not look presentable enough, such a person will not have the chance of leading a one-person, one-vote, ‘democratic’ country, ever.
The commentator gives some examples from the United States of America: President Eisenhower, who is his valedictory speech warned about the ‘military industrial complex,’ but did little about it when he was in office; President George W. Bush, took America into war with Iraq, to massively benefit this same military industrial complex, contractors have made US$ 138 billion out of the Iraq war!
This casts serious doubt on Winston Churchill’s maxim: “Democracy is the worst form of government, except that all other known existing forms are worse!” We have to keep looking. Until then we have to control the clowns – through time-tested checks and balances on absolute power, an independent judiciary, a free press and media, a depoliticised and autonomous administrative mechanism, term limits for elected politicians, by upholding the rule of law (as against the rule of clowns), bold and outspoken civil society organisations and the protection of human and fundamental rights. Otherwise the clowns take over.
Never forget, Lord Acton: “Power corrupts, absolute power, corrupts, absolutely.” This truism applies even to clowns.