Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Wednesday, March 27, 2013


Mervyn is attacking us because of his Iranian daughter in law” – Bodhu Bala Sena

Tuesday, 26 March 2013
A spokesperson for Bodhu Bala Sena said that Public Relations and Public Affairs Minister Mervyn Silva has started to speak against the Bodhu Bala Sena since his son Malaka is engaged to an Iranin Muslim girl. The Bodhu Bala Sena member said that the minister was speaking against the organization since he would be denied visas to Iran if he identified himself with Bodhu Bala Sena.
The spokesperson noted that Silva, who is celebrated his 69th birthday on the 25th, had returned to the country from Iran few days ago. Therefore, the Bodhu Bala Sena says that Silva’s comments against the organization should not be taken seriously.
The Bodhu Bala Sena stated that Silva who speaks of stripping India has not stated a word against America due to the fear of not receiving a visa to visit the country.



Wednesday , 27 March 2013
Oppose protest against Sri Lanka and attacks against Buddhist monks is continuously staged in Tamil Nadu, and   consequence  of this, if any incidents occur against the Tamils in Sri Lanka, the entire responsibility should be borne by the Indian Central Government, was the threats given  by the Sinhala racist movements yesterday.

Sri Lanka is a  sovereign nation and Tamil Nadu government’s  advanced activities to operate Sri Lanka as a Muppet cannot be permitted or accepted was said by Jathika Hela Urumaya former parliament member and Sinhala Ravaya movement Chairman Akmeema Dayaratne Thero. He said this issue will affect the existing bonds of both countries.  

Thero was queried,  at a state the resolution implemented against Sri Lanka at the UN Human Rights Council, and the continuous  protest against Sri Lanka in Tamil Nadu, he said, the Buddhist monks and Buddhist people visiting Tamil Nadu are getting attacked. Not only that, Sinhalese from Sri Lanka is refrained from visiting Tamil Nadu, due to threats are imposed.



He said how we could accept this. India is the sacred land where Buddha was born. Buddhist has the rights to visit there. Not only that, but India is our friendly neighbor country.

We have maintained relationship from the historical period. If the activities impact India, it would affect us too.  

The objections rising in Tamil Nadu against Sri Lanka, will affect the Sri Lanka Indian relationship, which we cannot permit. Sri Lanka is a sovereign country.


We will function according our suitability. However Tamil Nadu takes measures to transfigure us as a Muppet to abide to their imperatives which cannot be accepted by anyone. Because after war, all the Tamil people in Sri Lanka are living with ample privileges. Sinhala, Tamil and Muslim people are living with unity in this country.

Government did not show discrimination to any races and in this situation; why those in Tamil Nadu are engaged in such oppose activities.

If attacks continue in Tamil Nadu against Buddhist monks and Buddhists from Sri Lanka, if future activities against the Tamils in Sri Lanka unleashed, the entire responsibility should be shouldered by Indian Central government.

Hence by considering the future wellbeing of Tamils, and Indian relationship, Indian Central Government should take action to find an end to the ongoing oppose in Tamil Nadu against Sri Lanka was said by Akmeeman Dayaratne Thero.

Meanwhile Prof.Gunadasa Amarasekara Sinhala movement forum member and Patriotic Nation movement Leader said, the oppose activities advanced against Sri Lanka in Tamil Nadu are  systemized conspiracy. The Tamil Nadu Tamils does not have an inch of concern in the welfare of Tamils in Sri Lanka, which establishes from their activities.

They are involved in protest activities, that the Tamils in Sri Lanka should face persecution. Hence Indian Central government should not permit. It should obstruct the oppose activities against Sri Lanka in Tamil Nadu.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Casino King Packer arriving and with Raja –Packser patriots is to spawn self employed gamblers
(Lanka-e-News-26.March.2013, 9.30PM)Following the passing of the gambling (casino) bill in parliament with the full support of Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU ) who scream against gambling and make loud announcements that they would even sacrifice their lives to save the country from such activities , the No. one Casino King in the world,

Douglas Packer , the chief of the world’s top notch and chief of the Australian Crown casino is due to arrive in SL tomorrow on the 27th to create self employment opportunities for the ‘youths’ under the ‘great’ Mahinda Chinthana by opening casino dens in SL. In other words , SL is going to be ‘blessed’ with self employed gamblers – a new rare breed hitherto never known in the world ! King Casino Packer and King Kong Raja pakser are truly going to enter the Guinness book of records for this!

King Packer and ‘Raja Packsers’ are to establish this massive Casino Empire along with a Hotel complex at the large vehicle park in front of Lake House after clearing that area. To finalize this Packer is arriving in SL to have a final round of talks with the Raja Pakser brothers.
Previously , following discussions between Packer and Raja Packsers , it was planned to commence the Casino empire in front of Lake House in the early part of next year.

Packer family is a multibillionaire family and Douglas Packer is a grandson of that family. In SL Raja Packser family are also multibillionaires but by swindling the country . IN Australia Packer owns over 500 Roulette tables and over 2500 Poker machines. Packer along with his Casino business is also carrying on a media Institution under the name of PBL. It is being wondered whether our own Casino King bin Thilanga Sumathipala a sidekick of local Raja Packsers is imitating Packer for he too runs a media Institution. In any case Packer who owned assets to the value of Australian dollars 5.21 billion in 2012, is a multibillionaire in that country.

Packer owns a Boeing airplane, super cruiser ships, private Jets, and a number of Asten Martin cars. So , it is the hope of the SL Raja Packsers to join hands with Casino Packer and earn even on filth and squalor , and make this country flourish on self employment in the way they know it.

We can surely soon see the Bodhu Baala Senas tying the ‘Halal’ pirith threads on Casino Packer the gambler and Raja Packser the swindler blessing them with selfish prosperity based on filthy lucre.

Queen to skip Colombo Commonwealth meeting?

Queen to skip Colombo Commonwealth meeting?
Tuesday, 26 March 2013 The Independent
(TheIndependent) - Queen Elizabeth II, Head of the 54-nation Commonwealth, is likely to skip the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Colombo later this year, an Indian weekly newspaper has claimed.
The Sunday Guardian quoted unnamed officials within the Commonwealth Secretariat in London as saying that the Queen is "almost certain to skip the meeting," scheduled for 15-17 November.
Several Heads of Government are also "likely to keep away" from the Colombo meeting "in protest against Sri Lanka’s human rights record," the official added.
A senior official in the Commonwealth Secretariat told the newspaper that the Sri Lankan government has "spared no effort to convince (Commonwealth) members across the globe that it would be unfair and discriminatory to either change the venue or to boycott CHOGM."
Efforts were made, and are ongoing, to change the venue of the meeting to Mauritius, which has obtained clearance to host the 2015 CHOGM, the weekly reported.

So far, Sri Lanka has not been able to persuade Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the primary protagonist of the "Boycott Colombo" campaign, to change his mind.

The pro-Eelam Tamil Diaspora in Canada has won over the Stephen Harper government and has made it "almost certain that Canada will boycott the Colombo meeting in its entirety," the Commonwealth Secretariat official told the weekly.

Besides, the other "White Commonwealth"—-the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia—-may also desist from sending their Heads of Government to Colombo. Instead, they may depute either their Foreign Ministers or senior officials in their Foreign Ministries, the official further hinted.

If such a thing happens, it will essentially downgrade the upcoming summit of heads of government to a lower level affair.

The official also revealed that Canada is "putting pressure on the Caribbean members of the Commonwealth to back the boycott." Canada provides substantial financial assistance to the dozen Caribbean members of the Commonwealth, namely: Antigua & Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guayana, Jamaica, St Vincent $ the Grenadines, St Lucia, St Kitts & Newis, and Trinidad & Tobago.

The absence of Queen Elizabeth from the upcoming CHOGM will be a significant setback for President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s government because she always makes it a point to attend such prestigious Commonwealth summit meetings across the globe.

The Queen has always focused on better goverance across the Commonwealth, all of whose members were part of the British Empire, except Mozambique and Rwanda.

Recently, she unveiled a "Commonwealth Charter," which she wants implemented across the Commonwealth countries. The charter calls for good governance, respect for human rights, freedom of expression, and the rule of law.

The Queen has often talked of the "shared values" that bind the members of the Commonwealth together. In her view, these attributes form the core of such values.

Therefore, she is "unlikely to attend a forum in a capital where such values seem to be absent," the Commonwealth Secretariat official confided.
S. VENKAT NARAYAN
island.lk

BBC suspends Sri Lanka broadcasts due to 'interference'

BBCBBC Tamil logo
The BBC has been broadcasting a Tamil service for more than 70 years-26 March 2013 
The BBC is to stop providing radio news to Sri Lanka's state broad caster because of "continued interruption and interference" in its Tamil programming.

Both English language and Tamil services broadcast via the Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corporation (SLBC) have been stopped with immediate effect.
The BBC took similar action in 2009 when its services were also disrupted.
Audiences in Sri Lanka can continue to listen to the BBC on shortwave and via its online services.
The Sri Lankan authorities have not so far commented on the announcement.
BBC World Service Director Peter Horrocks announced the suspension on Tuesday.
"We regret the disruption in service to our loyal audiences in Sri Lanka, but such targeted interference in our programmes is a serious breach of trust with those audiences, which the BBC cannot allow," he said.
"We spoke to SLBC last week about interference that took place on 16-18 March and warned them they were in breach of their broadcasting agreement.
"Further disruption on Monday 25 March has left the BBC with no alternative but to suspend the service with immediate effect."
Mr Horrocks said that if the SLBC had specific complaints about any BBC output "they should take them up with us, as we have invited them to do, and not interfere directly with broadcasts in ways that are unacceptable to the BBC and misleading to our audiences".
For Catholics in Sri Lanka, Pope Francis is a challenge for lay and consecrated people

by Melani Manel Perera-03/25/2013

Religious and civil society leaders give their first impressions of the new bishop of Rome. For them, his election is "a push to bring Christ into the lives of the needy." Some Tamil students invited him to visit Sri Lanka soon.


Colombo (AsiaNews) - For some lay and religious Catholics involved in Sri Lankan society, Pope Francis represents a challenge for both lay people as well as the consecrated. Speaking to AsiaNews, they said that he is bound to open people's eyes and be an active tool for the redemption of the oppressed. Every day, they address their prayers to him.
According to Basil Fonseka, a Catholic journalist and writer, the pope's every word "flows from the life he lived, in brotherhood with the poor."
Thinking about the pope's homily on Palm Sunday, when he said that "Jesus entered Jerusalem to die on the Cross", or about his continual references to the need for "a poor Church for the poor," Pope Francis shows that he is an "active tool to redeem the oppressed, the blind, the imprisoned, and the enslaved to social and economic constraints."
What is more, "This pope," Fonseka said, "will be an ongoing challenge for both the clergy and the laity, to bring Christ into the lives of the needy through deeds."
Some female Tamil students at St Mary School in Colombo were affected "by the lifestyle shown by the Holy Father. He is a very simple person, full of love for everyone, without discrimination. We hope he might soon visit Sri Lanka, and bless us in person. "
Fr Mary Anthony, SJ, a former Jesuit provincial in Sri Lanka, is happy because of the election of Pope Francis. According to him, the Holy Father "will open the doors of the Church to the poor and marginalised. He will work for all the victims of an unjust system."


Is This How Our Motherland Should Treat Us?


*M. A. Sumanthiran – speech in Parliament on 21st March 2013 (Resettlement Authority Bill)



M. A. Sumanthiran MP
Thank you Mr. Deputy Chairman.
Colombo TelegraphThe Hon. Minister for External Affairs concluded with a question: ‘Is this right? Can we be happy with the way our Motherland is being treated by the United Nations system?’ I’d like to suggest that the question – more relevant question and the more serious question is not that. Is this how our Motherland should treat us, who are also citizens of this country? Merely because we are inferior in number that the greater in number should treat us as second class, or worse, third class citizens of this country.  If you can answer that question in good conscience as you claimed then most of these issues can be resolved.
The Hon. Minister for External Affairs chose to speak in the Queen’s English, a language that he is familiar with. He is also equally or more familiar with his own Mother tongue but he chose to speak in English today, a Western language. He is one who has benefited from Western education, even Western scholarship and he chose to cast aspersions on Western civilization. Counting the number of countries that he said have co-sponsored this Resolution, even in that I’m saddened that he was not up to date. Perhaps his colleague in Geneva does not keep him apprised of what’s happening there.  He should have been there, not his colleague. He has probably read the newspapers that said 32 countries have co-sponsored the resolution when in fact 43 countries, Hon. Minister, let me set the record straight, 43 countries have co-sponsored the Resolution and your colleague in Geneva is obviously not keeping you updated on what’s happening there. You’re 2 days late. Obviously you’re not getting information. You’re reading newspapers and gathering information.
Your complaint about who is sponsoring the Resolution – who sponsored the 2009 resolution in which government of Sri Lanka gave all of these assurances? It is on the 2009 resolution that the Resolution today is worded.  It is on the 2009 resolution that the resolution passed on the 23rd of March last year was also worded. Who sponsored those resolutions? When the Resolution is carried today, you’ll be surprised to know that countries from all continents have supported this Resolution.
(interruption) The Hon. Minister made an appeal to us not to disturb him when he spoke. After he made that appeal we did not disturb him. He does not have the grace to tell his backbenchers to do the same to us. This is how you treat the minorities in your country. You claim a privilege; you get all upset when you are corrected. We respected you when you spoke and didn’t say a word after you appealed to us to remain quiet when you spoke. But you sit there dumbfounded when your backbenchers treat us like this. This is your problem. This is precisely the issue in this country.  You think that because we are a numerical minority we don’t have a voice? That we cannot speak? Absolute arrogance…(interruption)
Speaker:  Hon. Azwer, please sit down
M.A. Sumanthiran: You do not know what is happening to your own community. You are a purchased commodity.
Speaker:  Hon. Sumanthiran, don’t attack him, continue with your subject.
M.A. Sumanthiran: No, he is a purchased commodity.
The amendment that is being moved today is only to extend the validity period of the Resettlement Authority from 6 years to 9 years. The Hon. Minister for External Affairs chose to speak on the Resolution in Geneva rather than on this Bill. I will speak on this Bill first and then deal with some of those matters that he raised as to what is happening in Geneva. Perhaps he has been given the forum there to give vent to his feelings and he has chosen this Parliament, the only forum that has been made available to him, so although not directly relevant he dealt with those matters.
The Minister for Resettlement very correctly answered questions that were posed while he was on his feet, by the Hon. Member for Hambantota from the UNP and revealed many truths. We’ve had the greatest respect for the Minister for Resettlement. From the time he was appointed to that post, he has chosen, and has always been careful to include us, to consult with us.  I remember the very next day he sent a note from there saying that he wanted to have discussions with us, and he has acted in that good spirit. In that spirit he answered truthfully the questions that were posed to him by the Hon. Member for Hambantota. He said that 470 houses have been built by the government in 4 years. Utterly shameful. If that is your resettlement, surely 3 more years is not enough for you. Aren’t you ashamed to admit to this House that that is all you can do when there were over 250, 000 houses that were razed to the ground? We have raised this from 2010 – from the mini budget in 2010. What is the government doing about this? We had to appeal to India. India promised 50,000 houses. Only 1000 are in the process of being made.
(interruption)
Minister for Commerce is interfering. Because of his interference and (that of) another cabinet colleague of his from the North even the implementation of the (construction of) houses in the North have been so delayed that the beneficiary list could not be settled for so long, after four years.
(interruption)
The vote has been carried in Geneva. I’d like to inform the Hon. Minister for External Affairs of the happy news that the resolution has been carried with an overwhelming majority, with only 13 voting against.
(interruption)
The Hon. Minister for Resettlement during his speech conceded that there were some houses that were built down Madu Road in the Mannar district. That is true, 52 houses were built.  Now we asked that question – in 2011 October 23rd in this House I placed a report in which we even gave pictures of those houses. I’d like to ask the Minister one question about that. How many Tamil people have been given houses out of those 52 houses? Not one. Now I don’t mind other communities being given houses. I’m not against that. I think other communities – Sinhalese – who lived in the North must come and live. We welcome them to come back and live. Muslims who were very wrongly chased away from the North must come back and live, and we support that process. In fact my Party Leader has even given it in writing to India, saying that Muslim persons must be given houses in the houses that they allocate. But I am asking this question, out of those 470 houses, I know that in one lot of 52 houses, not even one Tamil family has benefited out of those. Now why is this? Why do you treat the Tamil people like this? You do that and then you bitterly complain that the United Nations is passing a resolution to promote reconciliation and accountability in Sri Lanka.
The Hon. Minister asked the question…he criticized the High Commissioner for Human Rights. This happened even in Geneva by his colleague who was rude to the High Commissioner and at least one country protested in the Council itself that the Hon. Minister for Plantation Industries was rude. The Minister for Plantation Industries goes to Geneva while the External affairs Minister sits here. The Minister for External Affairs also should be careful. He constantly referred to the High Commissioner for Human Rights as ‘Navanathan Pillay’. She is not ‘Navanathan Pillay’. You must know that it is a basic tenet that you pronounce the name of the person (correctly) – that is how you respect that person. She is Navanetham Pillay, not ‘Navanathan Pillay’. He said that she’s shifting the goal post.  Having said that she’s shifting the goal post he later in his speech conceded that 7 days after the war ended she called for international investigations. How is she shifting the goal post then?  On the 26th of May 2009 she called for international investigations. In March 2013 also she is calling for international investigations.  Where is she shifting the goal post? And if international investigations were called for in 2009, 26th of May, what is the complaint that the Minister makes? His Excellency the President himself signed a Joint Communiqué with the Secretary General of the United Nations in Colombo assuring that the allegations of violations of international law will be inquired into. So, even your own President conceded that there were allegations that needed to be inquired into.
Now I want to say something about international investigations since such umbrage is being taken at the word ‘international’.
There are credible allegations against both sides that fought the war. One is the LTTE, the other is the government of Sri Lanka. Can you have an inquiry conducted by one of those accused persons? Can that ever be acceptable? Any inquiry must be independent, nobody can dispute that. Any inquiry must be independent. And in this instance, if the inquiry is to be independent it must necessarily be international. How can you have a local inquiry when one of the accused persons is the government of Sri Lanka, and that has been conceded to by no less a person than His Excellency the President in the Joint Communiqué that he signed on the 26thof May 2009?
He’s talking about bullying, countries being bullied. Who is being bullied within the country? Who is being bullied within the country? The Hon. Leader of the Opposition, just one day in Jaffna recounted his own experience. When the people there are being bullied by your military intelligence personnel? You can’t have one meeting there. Muslim women can’t walk on the streets of this country today in their traditional dress. In Manampitiya, Hon. Minister, a young girl in an abaya, was walking and she was attacked. She has made a complaint to the Polannaruwa police. On the day the Mattala airport was opened, the same night a church in Weerakettiya was attacked by a mob, unfortunately led by religious leaders – by Buddhist monks. And they go and demonstrate before the Indian High Commission saying two venerable monks have been attacked in Tamil Nadu. We condemn those attacks. We don’t support that. No monk should be attacked in Tamil Nadu. But why aren’t they complaining about the church being attacked in Weerakettiya, in your own country, before you look at other countries? Why aren’t they going in processions protesting that Muslim women are being attacked on the road? You don’t go on processions for that, you only have to complain about other countries. Look at yourself, inside, first. You put your house right. If you put your house right no one else will ever be able to point fingers at you. You have this happening in your own country. You treat people who are numerically in the minority like dirt, and then you have the brass to stand up and pontificate about international interference and call that bullying. When you get a little bit of the taste of your own medicine you are smarting but you can’t understand how much we feel being treated like dirt in this country. You talk about changing the goal post. What did your government do? They started talks with us. You were in that delegation that talked with us. 10th of January 2011, 3rd of February 2011, 18th of March 2011. All 3 times we gave proposals to you. You are the government. You had nothing to say. You had no proposals to give. You could not even respond to our own proposals. For 5 months and 7 meetings you came and sat there.
(interruption)
In resettlement, what is the progress that you have made? The LLRC at paragraph 9.134 very specifically says ‘the government must disengage security forces from all civil administration related activity as rapidly as possible’. That has not been done.  It is because the security forces have not been disengaged and it is because they occupy land that people have not been resettled. The Hon. Minister for Resettlement was very forthright. Talking about Keppapilavu he said ‘I have no authority. When they’re able to be resettled there I can do that. But now they are in temporary places.’ Why are they in temporary places? Because there’s a large military cantonment that has been built in Keppapilavu and people are being kept out. What has happened in Mullikulam. Hon. Minister for Mannar district will know what has happened in Mullikulam. What has happened in Valikamam North? What has happened in Sampoor? Why aren’t people being resettled? His Excellency the President on the 26th of May 2009, when he signed the Joint Communiqué, a second assurance that he gave was that all displaced persons will be resettled in their own places before the end of that year. That year. 2009. And in 2013 you come to this House and you want to extend the period of the Resettlement Authority for another 3 years. 4 years after His Excellency’s deadline ended you come and ask for another 3 years for the Resettlement Authority. What is the Resettlement Authority doing? Nothing. It is the Presidential Task Force that controls everything. There is no Resettlement Authority. I don’t know why the Minister for Resettlement wants this Authority, to extend this period. Resettlement is not complete. He concedes – 200,000 people are still not resettled. Even others who are said to be resettled only have to look at the carpet roads and the bridges and know that the government has money to do all of that but will not spend on priorities such as their own shelter and their livelihood.
Thank you.

Required: A Sri Lanka Policy - An Expat Sri Lankan Tamil's view                                          

Home

Dated 26-Mar-2013

Guest Column by Ana Pararajasingham
In December 2004, I wrote a paper titled “India's Sri Lanka Policy: Need for A Review”   (first published in the website of the South Asian Analysis Group)   arguing that that there was a need for New Delhi to review its Sri Lanka Policy.
My argument was based on the premise that a country’s national interests are served only when policies are based on ground realities. I pointed out that India’s Sri Lanka policy did not reflect ground realities, which, at that time meant    acknowledging the existence of two distinct power centres in Sri Lanka-Colombo in the South and Killinocchchi in the North.  The implication was clear-New Delhi should seek to improve its leverage by adopting a more nuanced approach to ensure that its own interests were not compromised.
 Instead, New Delhi, dictated by the belief  that by helping Colombo reassert its dominance over the entire island it could keep Sri Lanka within its orbit, provided Colombo with logistical support to cut off Tigers’ weapons supply.   It did not foresee Colombo counterbalancing Indian influence by bringing in China. Even after China’s direct involvement, New Delhi continued to extend its support to Colombo driven by the logic that it could not sit back and surrenders Sri Lanka into China’s embrace.[1]   In the meantime, by making New Delhi complicit in the brutal manner in which it brought the war to an end, Colombo has more than counterbalanced Indian influence. New Delhi’s apparent complicity in the horrendous war crimes committed during the final stages of the war has compromised New Delhi’s capacity to influence Colombo.  New Delhi’s impotence is not only due to its suspected complicity but also because of the demise of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). As the International Crisis Group  pointed out “With the LTTE gone, the Indian government may have lost its best opportunity to influence Sri Lankan policy… That powerful leverage has now been lost”.[2]
What New Delhi had not quite thought through in implementing its policy which was primarily focused on getting rid of the LTTE[3] can be broadly summarised as follows:
(a)   A complete failure to grasp the agenda of the Sri Lankan State in respect of the Tamil people in Sri Lanka.
The Sri Lankan State given its unitary constitution is a state where all political power resides with the majority Sinhala nation. This is because within the confines of unitary state the Sinhalese who make up well over seventy-five per cent of the population are a permanent majority. Since its independence in 1948, this Sinhala dominated state has relentlessly pursued an agenda of completely Sinhalising the state. This agenda is informed by the ideology that the entire island belongs only to the Sinhalese and the Tamils are interlopers. This is a well understood ideology explored in depth by several academics, Sinhalese, Tamils and those from the international community. It is this notion which has driven   successive Sri Lankan governments to pursue Sinhalisation through various means and thereby deny the Tamils a distinct identity as a people occupying a contiguous well defined area-the Tamil Homeland. Consequently any arrangement that provides autonomy to the Tamils is anathema to the Sinhala dominated Sri Lankan state.   Hence, Mohan Ram’s conclusion in “Sri Lanka Fractured Island” that the “ Sinhala majority  has all along thought that any Tamil demand can only be met  the cost of its own interest, a zero sum game… and is not reconciled to even providing  limited concessions  the Tamils were given under the Indo Sri Lanka Agreement”[4]
New Delhi appears to have not grasped this basic tenet underpinning the actions of the Sri Lankan state. Its hope that with the demise of the LTTE, Sri Lanka could be persuaded to at least ‘devolve’ some political power to the Tamils was entirely misplaced. New Delhi’s role in cooperating with Colombo appears to have been predicated by the flawed perception that once the LTTE is liquidated the Sinhalese could be persuaded to provide concessions to the Tamils.
Instead, the Sri Lankan state has taken advantage of the military solution which it had imposed with New Delhi’s help to further its own agenda of Sinhalising the state through changing the demography of the Tamil Homeland. This is being pursued through a strategy of ‘Ethnic flooding’[5] whereby the Tamil Homeland is flooded with Sinhalese population, initially, with families of the armed forces and thereafter with civilian settlers. New Delhi has been completely outsmarted by this strategy which has the potential to render any ‘devolution’ meaningless.
(b)   A failure to evaluate the impact of China’s direct involvement in Sri Lanka
It has been argued that India’s involvement in Sri Lanka has been underpinned by the doctrine that Colombo should remain exclusively within New Delhi’s sphere of influence. This is based on the premise of India being the regional power and Sri Lanka a state within this region.[6] By permitting China’s entry, New Delhi has in effect not only abandoned this policy but appears to have endangered its own geopolitical interests. 
(c)    A failure to realise the impact  in Tamil Nadu
New Delhi has failed to factor into its strategy of assisting Sri Lanka, the fall out in Tamil Nadu. The manner in which the victory was achieved through the deployment of genocidal   violence and the role played by New Delhi in extending its support to the Sri Lankan regime has alienated Tamil Nadu. Sam Rajappa, writing for the New Statesmannoted that Tamil Nadu is on the boil due to India’s contribution to the genocide (of Tamils) in Sri Lanka and should Rajapaksa and company are hauled up before the International Court of Justice at The Hague, New Delhi cannot escape responsibility for this horrendous brutality.[7]  In 2011, Tamil Nadu Assembly adopted a unanimous resolution seeking the imposition of economic sanctions against Sri Lanka by India. The resolution moved by Chief Minister Jayalalitha also wanted India to press the United Nations to declare as "war criminals" those who committed crimes during the conflict in Sri Lanka. [8] New Delhi’s  impotence or unwillingness to press for a strongly wondered resolution at the March 2013 UNHCR sessions has made it untenable for the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) the ruling party’s ally in the Central government to continue its support for a government that is widely viewed by Tamil Nadu as having betrayed the  Tamil  people. In March 2013 the DMK withdrew its support greatly undermining the Congress led UPA’s capacity to stay in power.
It is imperative on the part of New Delhi’s policy makers to review the failed Sri Lanka policy and forge a bold approach to regain some influence in the region.
This bold approach must primarily address the ongoing plight of the Tamil people in Sri Lanka taking into account the agenda of the Sri Lankan state and its inclination to continue with the zero sum game. As part of its Sri Lanka policy New Delhi can and indeed should seek to protect the Tamil people by transforming the Tamil homeland in Sri Lanka into a protectorate. There is precedence for such an act in the protection that the US was able to provide for Iraq’s Kurdish population   in northern Iraq.
 If New Delhi is able to successfully implement such a policy it can serve its interest in many ways. Apart from addressing the Tamil Nadu factor, it can also provide New Delhi the strategic space to counter the increasing Chinese influence in Sri Lanka. Such a policy will also be in keeping with the advice proffered by Professor Sumantra  Bose[9] in 2007 in  the course  of his key note address at a  seminar[10] exploring the international dimensions of the conflict in Sri Lanka. According to Bose, despite the unhappy history of the last twenty years, it is with the Tamil people of Sri Lanka that India needs to build its alliance. New Delhi ought to build on the natural affinity between India and the Tamil people of Sri Lanka. There is no other community that has such powerful affinity of a historical and cultural nature with India. He made this point in the context of the perception by the Indian establishment “with good cause” that it is surrounded by hostility in the region[11].
 (Ana Pararajasingham was Director- Programmes with the Centre for Just Peace and Democracy (CJPD) between 2008 and 2009.    He is the author of “Sri Lanka’s Endangered Peace Process and the Way Forward” (2007) and the editor of “The Conflict in Sri Lanka::Ground Realities (2005) and “Sri Lanka:60 Years of Independence and Beyond” (2009).)


[1] A Pratap in  “Lessons to be learnt from the rout of the LTTE” –The Week 31 May 2009
[2]   The International Crisis Group “India and Sri Lanka after the LTTE”, June 2011, p6
[3] Ibid p4-5
[4] Mohan Ram, Sri Lanka: The Fractured Island, New Delhi: Penguin Books (India), 1989,p138
[5] Ethnic flooding – the continuing and deliberate settling of Sinhalese populations on land in the Tamil homeland – to alter the demographic balance and thereby systemically erase the Tamil nation’s territorial ­identity- S Sathanathan in “After Pirapakaran: Deepening Internal Colonialism”,http://www.sangam.org/2010/08/Internal_Colonialism.php, viewed on 19th March 2013.
[6] D T Hagerty,”India’s Regional Security Doctrine”, Asian Survey, Vol: XXXXI, No 4, April 1991
[7]“ S Rajappa,  “India and 'the Killing Fields of Sri Lanka”, The Statesman, 12 July 2011,http://thestatesman.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=376293&catid=38viewed on 18th July 2011
[9] Sumantra Bose is Professor of International and Comparative Politics at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
[10] Jointly hosted by TRANCEND International and the Centre for Just Peace and Democracy (CJPD) in Switzerland in June 2007.
[11] S Bose, “India”  in “ International Dimensions of the Conflict in Sri Lanka” Centre  for Just Peace and Democracy (CJPD) , Emmenbrucke, Switzerland, 2008.

Colombo's land appropriation to be accelerated in North

[TamilNet, Tuesday, 26 March 2013, 00:09 GMT]
TamilNetAiming to alienate lands from the people of North and East and to enable the colonial governors and SL government agents to abet an accelerated land appropriation, circumventing even the legal challenges posed by Tamil activists and NGOs, the Sri Lankan Minister of Lands and Land Development, Janaka Bandara Tennakoon, has set forth parameters for a land programme with the participation of the Sri Lankan military in the North this month. But, the projection given to the world during the Geneva session was that the SL State was establishing two offices in Jaffna and Ki'linochchi, to hand over thousands of acres of lands back to civilians. When questioned where these lands are situated and under which GS areas they come in, the minister or the military commander had no specific answer to provide, news sources in Ki'linochchi and Jaffna said. 

Land office in Jaffna
SL minister Tennakoon who has been advisor to SL president Mahinda Rajapaksa on land issues assailed media operating from Jaffna as waging propaganda against his policies. The paper at his hands reads “lands in Valikaamam North are to be permanently appropriated”.

SL Minister of Lands and Land Development Janaka Bandara Tennakoon, together with SL military commander in Jaffna Mahinda Hathurusinghe, declared opened a land office for Jaffna on 11 March. The next day, the SL minister, together with SL military officials and EPDP operative Chandrakumar, declared open another land office for Ki'linochchi. The SL State was engaged in a propaganda stating that the land offices were being opened according to the LLRC recommendations to resolve land disputes. 


SL military commander and SL minister co-chaired the opening of land office in Jaffna on 11 March, 2013
The offices will be functioning under the SL military agenda of converting former High Security Zones into Sinhala Military Zones. 

Further, the offices established in Jaffna and Ki'linochchi will be categorising everything that comes under military occupation as ‘lost lands’, an ambiguous term introduced in the recent Land Circular issued in January this year. 

This justifies the occupation of strategic lands under the tag of ‘development activities’ initiated by the occupying SL State, Tamil legal activists say. 

Most of the so-called ‘development activities’ are carried out by the occupying Sri Lankan military forces. 

* * *

Just a few days after going on public record that 10,000 acres were under the SL military occupation in Valikaamam North, the commander of occupying SL military in Jaffna, Major General Mahinda Hathurusinghe, at the opening of the so-called land office in Jaffna now said that the SL military was keeping only 5,000 acres of the lands and that 3,000 acres of these lands belonged to State. 

The visiting SL minister was telling those present at the event that his ministry had acquired 5,000 acres from the SL military for distribution back to civilians adding that he was functioning as advisor to SL president on land issues since 2010. 

However, when reporters questioned where these lands, which both the SL minister and the SL military commander were talking about are located, they had no answer. They also skipped to respond to the question on when they would commence the act of returning the lands. 

While they were talking about handing over lands to civilians, the SL military on the ground had just completed fencing 24 village divisions in Valikaamam North. 

The SL minister was particular in attacking the media operating from the peninsula. He also attacked TNA parliamentarians for filing lawsuits against the SL State. 

Informed sources said the new office in Jaffna was aiming to legally appropriate the lands for the Sinhala Military Zones. 

State lands for ‘development’ activities would be identified in all the 72 divisions in North and East, Tennakoon claimed. 

Land office in Ki'linochchi
The meeting was co-chaired by SL military officials and EPDP paramilitary in Ki'linochchi

In the meantime, almost all the Divisional Secretaries in Jaffna are under direct pressure from the occupying Governor and SL military officials to take immediate action to legally appropriate lands from the owners for the already established SL military cantonments. 

Land office in Ki'linochchi
SL Minister for ‘land appropriation’ Mr Janaka Bandara Tennakoon, opens district land office at Ki'linochchi on 12 March, 2013
400 million rupees have been allocated for the Jaffna and Ki’linochchi land offices that have been opened for the purpose of land appropriation under the propaganda slogan of resolving land issues for the resettling people. 

This latest move comes following the announcement of a new Land Circular (2013/01) titled “Accelerated Programme on Solving Post Conflict State Lands Issues in the Northern and Eastern Provinces”. 

A similar Land Circular, issued in July 2011, evoked public outrage and was withdrawn in January 2012, after it was legally challenged. 

But, the LLRC report, issued in November 2011, was welcoming the Circular and was appreciative of the inclusion of occupying SL military officials in the committees dealing with the land issue in North and East. 

The LLRC report stated that land records in the entire Mullaith-theevu district have been completely destroyed. It also stated that the land records in the three of the four divisions of the Ki'inochchi district and 90% of records in two of the five districts in Mannaar district have been destroyed. 
* * *

Meanwhile, the owners of the lands, having original documents, were often confronted by the question of authenticity of their documents, by the colonial agents of the SL State. 

The SL State policy also attempts to classify certain lands as lands allocated under ‘terrorist influence’ and de-legitimise the lands that had been distributed to people under poverty line by the positive policies adopted under the de-facto administration of Eezham Tamils. 

In sharp violation of the territorial customary Law (Theasvazhamai / Thesawalamai) of the people in the North, the LLRC attempts to justify the claim that “any citizen of Sri Lanka has the inalienable right to acquire land in any part of the country”. The opposition UNP parliamentarians have also gone on record defending this position. 

The SL government's so-called land policy document, released in July 2011, titled ‘Regulating the Activities Regarding Management of Lands in the Northern and Eastern Provinces.’ Following this policy document, a Land Circular (No 2011/04) was issued. 

A public notice by the SL government, following this Circular, demanded the people to register their lands before 20 November 2011, sending shockwaves to Eezham Tamils across the world. 

The 2011 Circular was withdrawn in January 2012, following legal challenge initiated by the Tamil National Alliance. 

The latest Circular (2013/01) is just the same policy in new wrapping with ambiguous terms. It deals with private lands while claiming that the policy is about State lands. The latest policy also attempts to deploy other ‘provisions’ in the law of the occupying Sri Lanka to appropriate lands. 
* * *

As for all practical purposes, the State being a Sinhala State and its military being a Sinhala military, the talk of ‘State land’ means ‘Sinhala land’, Tamil activists Jaffna said. 

This kind of assertion of ‘State’ in the island that has explicit genocidal connotations is internationally endorsed by the USA and India that encourage legalisation of genocide in the island, for them to ultimately appropriate the entire island, the activists said. 

The British colonialism used terms such as ‘Crown Land’ and ‘Crown Colony’, the activists further said.