Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Saturday, March 16, 2013


No Outriders Please, We’d Rather Do Without Them

By Emil van der Poorten -March 16, 2013 
Emil van der Poorten
Colombo TelegraphA recent incident on our doorstep, as it were, brought back to us, “in glowing technicolour,” as that out-dated expression had it, the constant challenge of dealing with what might be potential threats in a realistic manner while avoiding descent into paranoid schizophrenia!
It’s bad enough being threatened on the streets of the city in which you were born, in broad daylight, no less, for “writing against the President” but having burly motorcyclists coming up one’s approach road, with pillion-rider in tow, checking one out on the week-end is getting to be a bit much! And this is not some “carpeted” highway that the guy had traversed in order to reach my abode, but a road which the local Pradeshiya Sabhawa ensures is kept in a condition that has now led to commercial vehicles refusing to bring our “bread and butter” – paying guests – to our home.
In all fairness, one has to give what might be outriders for a potentially more sinister follow-up visit some credit for being intrepid enough to negotiate a track that would be a challenge even for a bullock cart of yore. After all, if the attempted reconnaissance came unglued, rider and buddy could have been in serious trouble if their vertical stance dissolved into a horizontal one!
But, to the narrative………………..
Given the fact that most of those who work for us and live in the neighbourhood have been associated with my family for the better part of my lifetime and, in some cases, going back a generation or two, both in their families’ and mine, there is a certain camaraderie that prevails across class, cultural and language divisions. Having demonstrated that we are not mahatmayas and nona-mahatmayas of the ruling class who merely issue orders to those who might earn a living on our land or in our business, we all tend to look out for each other and perform the odd little courtesy when required, pretending, perhaps, to the status of “good neighbor.”
Anyway, last Saturday, one of our neighbours who happens to be on our payroll as well, encountered what he described as a rather large man with a companion on a motorbike, a good way up our approach road. This individual had inquired after me, with the usual reference to the “suddha” (white man) who lived at the top of the hill, saying that he wanted to meet me. “Our man Friday” who had developed a particular and consistent response to inquiries of this kind, with the knowledge that people of certain political affiliation appeared to take an inordinate interest in me ever since I had begun writing for The Sunday Leader, pretended that he had no particular connection to us but advised the motor-cyclist and his passenger that the gate at our home was kept locked and only those who had provided advanced notice of their arrival were let in. Our potential visitors had then gone on to the only other house located off our road.
When my informant spoke with our neighbours who had been visited by the motorcyclist and his passenger subsequently, he had been told that the strangers were interested in building a timber storage depot of some kind and were checking out the area for suitable prospects. Given the weird and wonderful reasons that people have for riding motorbikes on very inhospitable tracks, this could well have been the absolute truth. However, the entire incident brought home to us the current “reality” in the Disaster of Asia where the rule of law is conspicuous by its absence and crime of all descriptions is rampan.
While we haven’t lost any sleep over this incident, our level of alertness was raised a notch or two and would stay that way for a little while at least, “just in case!”
In days gone by, the response to this business of strangers loitering around one’s neighbourhood would have been a phone call and/or a visit to the local police station with the request that one of their number check out who this person might be and his bona fides. In short, whether there was any cause for concern and what the local constabulary could do to alleviate any potential hazard. And, at this point let me say that I have generally found the local police personnel a pretty decent bunch who appear to live up to the old motto, “To serve and protect.”
But times change, and since the visitor could well have been an unsavoury “emissary” of some kind with “political connections,” such an approach on our part could well have been not only an exercise in futility but an invitation to behaviour of a kind that you would not want visited upon you when you don’t have so much as a blunderbuss for protection.
To us, the significant realization is that what would be totally abnormal in any democratic country is totally normal in Sri Lanka and, dare I say it, magnified if one is not seen as an acolyte of “the powers that be?” Interesting stuff, indeed, and something that I could have very appropriately included under the title of my column last week that talked about black being white and white being black.
While our Sri Lankan world is, without the shadow of a doubt, an upside-down one, is it necessary to spend your waking hours standing on your head to make any sense of a culture of unfettered criminality and lunacy? Seems like a hell of a poor use of one’s time!
IIT students to join anti-Lanka stir


TNN | Mar 17, 2013,
CHENNAI: A day after the state government order all arts and science colleges in Tamil Naduto shut down, students of IIT-M on Saturday decided to hold a protest against the treatment ofTamils in Sri Lanka, marking a new chapter in the otherwise politics-free tech campuses. 

The one-day hunger strike will begin at 8am on Sunday. The students, who claimed to have obtained permission from the administration for the protest, have also arranged a panel discussioninvolving activists on the issue in the afternoon. The protest will end with a rally. 

"We have taken permission from our management for the protest. Many students from other states have no knowledge of the Sri Lankan Tamil issue. It is also an attempt to make them aware of the plight ofTamils in Sri Lanka," said S Rathnavel, a chemical engineering student who is one of the organizers. 

"We are holding this protest to highlight the humanitarian crisis. Our panel discussion will focus on the political history of Sri Lanka, current ground reality and other related issues. It will also discuss what will be the best solution for Tamils in the Island nation," Rathnavel said. He said the campaign will be taken to other IIT campuses in the country

IIT director Bhaskar Ramamurthi said, "If the students want to show their solidarity with the cause, they have the freedom to do so." When asked whether the campus will be shut down if the protest escalates, he said he doesn't anticipate any such trouble

India still backing Sri Lanka
By, TNN | Mar 17, 2013,
NEW DELHI: Even as speculation is mounting on the stand it would take on the US-sponsored resolution in the UN Human Rights Council, India has made a statement that is not in the least critical of Sri Lanka's handling of the Tamil issue. The fortuitously timed statement came on Friday in the context of Sri Lanka's universal periodic review (UPR) of its human rights record. 

Despite political pressure from DMK to act tough, India complimented Colombo for responding positively to its suggestions on the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC), which had been set up in 2010 at the end of the civil war with LTTE. "India appreciates Sri Lanka's acceptance of our recommendation to implement the recommendations of the LLRC report," according to the statement on the UPR. 

This is in contrast to the US reaction to the same UPR: "We are disappointed that the government rejected all UPR recommendationsmade by states that called upon it to implement the LLRC recommendations." 

On the DMK demand for an international tribunal to determine the genocide question, all that the government did was to express hope in its statement that "investigations of allegations of human rights violations and loss of civilian lives will be independent and credible". It added that Sri Lanka had "welcome progress" on residual issues pertaining to the resettlement and rehabilitation process. 

While it "noted the commitment" by Colombo to hold elections in the violence-ravaged Northern Province in September, the Indian statement skirted human rights concerns over attacks on journalists and the subversion of the judiciary. 

Britain, on the other hand, referred to the attacks on journalists and expressed "serious concerns about lack of freedom of expression in Sri Lanka". Further, UK demanded an explanation for why Colombo was not allowing the UN special rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression to visit the island. London was also critical of the impeachment of the chief justice, which it said appeared to "contravene principles of fairness and respect for the independence of the judiciary". 

Though this may not be a precursor to its stand on the upcoming US-sponsored resolution, India maintained a conciliatory tone in its March 15 statement on a range of issues affecting Tamil civilians. "We hope other issues like early progress towards reconciliation, reduction of high security zones, return of private land by the military and phasing out of the security forces in civilian activities in the Northern Province, will be done in an effective and timely manner." 

Tamil Eelam Freedom Charter To Enshrine Clearly Enunciated Principles Of International Law

By Usha S Sri Skanda Rajah -March 16, 2013 |
Usha S Sri-Skanda-Rajah
Colombo TelegraphIt’s a great step in the right direction; the fact that the Tamil people will be the architects of the Tamil Eelam Freedom Charter and will be contributing towards “developing” and drafting it, is a heart warming thought. Tamil Eelammust be governed by its people, in that there is no doubt; how will it be governed is as important a question that must be addressed and there is no better time than to do it now and do it right.
Here then is a truly forward looking initiative; the Tamil people have been given an opportunity to reassert their rights through this Freedom Charter. Prime Minister Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, reiterated, the Charter, “whilst taking the Vaddukoddai Resolution forward and at the same time drawing inspiration from Britain’s Magna Carta, the Freedom Charter of the African National Congress (ANC) as well as the Palestinian National Charter,” will enshrine clearly enunciated principles of international law, a conclusion that can be arrived at, after looking at the survey questions designed to obtain the people’s inputs.
It goes without saying the Charter will show a great unity of purpose. In the words of the TGTE Minister for Political Affairs Thayaparan Thanikasalam, it will be a “major soft power tool to demonstrate that the Tamil people are united in purpose, and are irrefutably bound by principles of international law through this Freedom Charter, containing the rights and freedoms that are recognized and respected by the international community and the United Nations.” Thayaparan was insisting, demonstrating unity of purpose through the Charter is an important factor, one that will determine international acceptance and support. The Minister, one of the leading proponents of the Tamil Eelam Freedom Charter project was talking about the importance of the Tamil speaking people coming together through this Freedom Charter to enhance their soft power.
The “question of how Tamil Eelam will look like is most critical,” Thayaparan sought to explain, because the “question of Tamil Eelam itself is an already established fact,” he said, one that can be further validated in a referendum.
I have to agree with the Minister.  This is the time to envision how Tamil Eelam would unfold, and to determine the fundamentals required for a model Nation State.
As Tamils make their ‘Freedom Demands’ known through the survey, the prospect of finally taking some concrete steps towards reinforcing the rights of the North East Tamil people to restoring an independent and sovereign Tamil Eelam is exciting after the unimaginable setbacks of the past.
Not merely reflecting on the thought of freedom but being called upon to articulate the rights that should be contained in the Freedom Charter is an exhilarating experience, enslavement on the other hand being excruciating. It’s time that the Tamil people held captive in a highly militarized North East enjoyed the kind of rights and freedoms that the Freedom Charter will guarantee.
The question as to whether the Tamil people want a referendum, is in the special survey that the TGTE wants all Tamil speaking people to answer: “Do you believe the outcome of a referendum would decide the permanent political solution to liberate the Tamil people, and for them to live in peace with dignity and security as a Nation?” the survey asks.
The TGTE has always maintained that the people of Tamil Eelam and the Tamil Diaspora are two sides of the same coin, so the question as to who should vote in a referendum is also an important one and is another question that’s asked in the survey.
The survey itself has been well crafted. With 35 questions the survey can be accessed online onwww.tamileelamfreedomcharter.org : “With clearly enunciated principles, the eventual promulgation in the international arena,” of the Freedom Charter, “is a credible way of realizing our freedom,” the portal states.Those enunciated principles are articulated in this question posed in the survey, for instance: “Do you support the principles of justice, freedom, sovereignty, self determination, human dignity, and the right of peoples to exercise them?” the survey asks.
A question on the territorial integrity of the Tamil Nation State is an important one in the present context when the Rajapaksa government is bent on manipulating the demographic composition of Tamil Eelam through intense Sri Lankan state sponsored colonization both through establishing Sinhala settlements and appropriation of private and state land for army cantonments and military centered developments as opposed to people centered, for example, corporate and agricultural initiatives undertaken by the Sri Lankan military. The three concepts of the right to self determination, homeland and nationhood upon which Tamils base their claim, hinges on reasserting the territorial integrity of Tamil Eelam.: “Do you agree that the 8 Districts namely Amparai, Batticaloa, Jaffna, Kilinochchi, Mannar, Mullaitivu. Trincomalee and Vavuniya in the NorthEast mentioned in the Interim Self Governing Authority (ISGA) Proposal constitute the geographic description of Tamil Eelam?” the survey asks.
There are many questions in the survey that relate to human rights, social, civil, political and cultural rights and principles of democracy including the protection of those rights; international law principles that should and would take its rightful place in the Charter. This augers well for the future of Tamil Eelam and illustrate how important such rights are to Tamils: “Do you agree that every law, regulation, rule, order, or decision in Tamil Eelam shall conform to internationally accepted standards of human rights protection? Do you agree that there shall be an independent Human Rights Commission, with assistance from international human rights bodies to facilitate the rapid establishment of an effective system for protecting human rights and to ensure compliance with all such human rights obligations?” the survey asks.
Another question close to my heart that I was pleased to see related to article 27 of  the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that guarantee the civil and political rights of individuals, including theright to lifefreedom of religionfreedom of speechfreedom of assembly, electoral rights and rights to due process and a fair trial: “Do you agree that minority rights guaranteed in Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights cannot be changed even with a two-third majority and referendum in Tamil Eelam?” the survey asks.
That the people of Tamil Eelam would not tolerate impunity by its own governments and that all actors will be open to international scrutiny is reflected in this Question: “Should Tamil Eelam accede to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court?” the survey asks.
The question: “Will the establishment of Tamil Eelam contribute to regional peace and stability?” is a critical question because of its strategic location, and would and should elicit a resounding yes. Most of the questions had space allocated for comments which allowed the respondent opportunity to make additional points and recommendations. Further, the survey asked for “any other rights/matters related to freedom that you can think of, not mentioned in this questionnaire and should be included in the Freedom Charter,” and wanted the respondent to list them.
With much respect and credence given to human rights, justice, democratic values and fundamental freedoms, the Tamil Eelam Freedom Charter will reflect a model Nation State.
Drafting the Charter is a huge responsibility before the Tamil people and their ability to participate fully in this endeavour and work in concert would ensure its success. The promulgation of the Tamil Eelam Freedom Charter on May 18, 2013 will be an important milestone for the Tamil people in their journey towards freedom and should be celebrated.
The survey can be found online on: http://tamileelamfreedomcharter.org/?p=35
Usha S Sri Skanda Rajah
Chair TGTE Senate

22nd session of the UN Human Rights Council Item 6 – Universal Periodic Review, General debate

Saturday, 16 March 2013 
RADDHO welcomes the report A/HRC/22/16 on Sri Lanka.
Out of Sri Lanka’s 100 accepted recommendations, RADDHO would like to bring to the Council’s attention that more than 70% raise the question, as to whether they were really important for any State to make as a recommendation under the UPR.
If this newly invented practice within the UPR process continues, states with horrendous human rights violations will be allowed to sweep their skeletons under the carpet.
RADDHO takes this opportunity to inform the HRC that if every state comes out with a pretext that they cannot accept many recommendations “due to the need to protect their state sovereignty”, what will be value of the UPR process?
State Sovereignty cannot be used as a pretext to avoid fulfilling obligations under international human rights law and international humanitarian law. The UPR is, as we understand it, to promote the protection, not the denial, of human rights.
Former UN General Secretary Kofi Annan, once said in the 55th session of the UN Human Rights Commission, (7 April 1999) that, “…No government has the right to hide behind national sovereignty in order to violate the human rights or fundamental freedoms of its peoples. Whether a person belongs to the minority or the majority, that person's human rights and fundamental freedoms are sacred”.
Mr. President, RADDHO is concerned about the ongoing violence against women and girls in Pakistan and the lack of legal measures to protect religious minorities including Shias, Ahmadis, Christians, Hindus and Sikhs. We strongly believe that the promotion of human rights education in Pakistan, particularly in the rural areas should be given the highest priority.
We also encourage the Government of Pakistan to exert all its efforts to adopt an inclusive environment that respects the fundamental rights of all its citizens.
15 March 2013
Intervention by – Visuvalingam KIRUPAHARAN

The US Resolution: Does It Signify Cosmopolitanism?

By Sumanasiri Liyanage -March 16, 2013
Sumanasiri Liyanage
Colombo TelegraphI did a small survey speaking to three women belonging to different social status. The first one was a middle-aged woman from Haloya in Kandy. A middle class and middle-aged woman from Colombo (although she was originally from Anuradhapura) who is active in various social movements and a regular participant at Lipton circle protests was the second person. The third one was a young final year student following a special degree course in political science and public policy at the University of Colombo. The second person has been known to me for some time, but not the other two. I told them that the US government has submitted a resolution on (I was careful not to say ‘against’) Sri Lanka to UN Human Rights Council. Then I briefly explained the main idea of it. I tried to be objective as far as I can, but do not claim 100% objectivity on my part, even if such thing exists. In fact, the second and the third interviewees had previous knowledge on what I said, but all what I said were new to the first person. Then I posed the same question to all three: In your opinion, do you think that this US resolution on Sri Lanka should be carried through at the Human Rights Council in Geneva? Interestingly, I received three different responses from them that I report below in my own translation:
Woman 1: “They [the US] want to overthrow this government and this is part of their plan so that it should not be carried through.” [No]
Woman 2: “Mahinda Rajapaksa government is dictatorial and corrupt and violates human rights trying to impose quasi-military rule. The issue of human rights transcends national boundaries. As the international community has a role to play to correct this situation, the US Resolution SHOULD be carried through. (her emphasis)” [Yes]
Woman 3: Mahinda Rajapaksa government is authoritarian and bad in handling the post-war situation. It should be learnt a lesson, but definitely not by the US and the EU that work on a different agenda. The US Resolution should not be carried through but a big struggle by the Sri Lankans against the government should be mobilized. [No, But …]
I do not claim that this minute sample is in any reasonable sense representative as all three women are Sinhala. Nor do I say that the views on the US Resolution are confined to these three. The answers I got to my simple question raise more serious moral and political issue as the second woman claimed that she stood for cosmopolitanism against parochial nationalism. What is meant by cosmopolitanism? Do other two answers represent parochial nationalism? If I put it precisely, my main issue is: does the US Resolution against Sri Lanka stem from its cosmopolitan views and perspective? These are the theme I would like focus on this article.
Seyla Benhabib has identified three genres. (1) For Martha Nussbaum, it signifies ‘an attitude of enlightened morality that does not place “love of country” ahead of “love of mankind”. (2) The second genre ‘signifies hybridity, fluidity and recognizing the fractured and internally riven character of human selves and citizens whose complex aspirations cannot be circumscribed by national fantasies’ (Jeramy Waldron). The third genre that is associated with critical theory tradition posits that it is ‘a normative philosophy for carrying the universalistic norms of discourse ethics beyond the confines of the nation-state’. In fact all three genres focus on basic value system associated with cosmopolitanism. Nonetheless, it is misleading to argue that the support for the US Resolution represents cosmopolitanism in any of these senses just because of the apparent identity between that position and the above definitions. All three definitions would be reduced into barren lifeless abstractions unless they are situated in the real global context in which politics and power structure play a crucial and determining role. However, this discursive field and its complexity was not unfortunately given a serious consideration when many people and countries come out to support the US Resolution against Sri Lanka. It seems they consider the US as the crusader of democracy, human rights and all other goodies. As Noam Chomsky has argued, the US is the main aggressor in the globalized world. When it comes to its national interest, the US has no consideration or respect for any of these cosmopolitanist values. In the last decade or so, the US has destabilized the entire West Asian region and the Arab World. Its destabilizing role is now amply evident in Pakistan. One may deduce that its activities would also destabilize India sooner or later unless India takes precautionary actions by reversing the focus of its foreign policy. LateHugo Chavez’s unconditional opposition to the US and his conditional support for all anti-US leaders their authoritarianism and suppression of people in their own countries notwithstanding seem to have deduced from the understanding of this real world situation.
Sri Lanka cosmopolitanists may argue that the so-called international community can play a positive role in restraining the anti-democratic and majoritarian policies of the Mahinda Rajapaksa regime. They would further argue that the intervention of the West in the Arab World had produced such a positive results. This argument suffers from three flaws. First, it implies that the international pressure can be/ would be a substitution for national struggle against the regime. Many cosmopolitanists do not want to wage a struggle against the current regime going beyond the legalistic field. As a result, they have become the preferred interlocutors of the West. Secondly, they seem to assume that the West is capable of selfless intervention. The US or the West is not interested in Thamil rights or rights of other numerically small nations and ethnic groups or the democratic rights of the Sri Lankan people. They are only interested in their agenda of global domination. Thirdly, the intervention of the West in the Arab World was not uniform as in some countries the West stood for the defense and protection of highly authoritarian regimes.
Hence, my argument is that the positions of the first and third women I interviewed represent not necessarily parochial nationalist position but the concern and fear of the imperialist domination. The third woman in a way took the above discursive field into consideration at least implicitly, when she answered my question. Why the position of the second woman looks very attractive. As Vijay Prasad correctly argue, “the interventionists getting the upper hand because their position was the policy of powerful governments. That is the reason why the UN opened up a dialogue about the R2P doctrine. A concerted effort to shut down other sources of debate and action led the UN Security Council to being suborned to a western narrative, and for all regional institutions and regionalism itself to being sidelined”.
One may pose a counter-argument that the positions of the first and third woman are tantamount to the support for the current Sri Lankan regime that has delayed purposely giving a political solution to the Tamil national question, and has been practicing divide and rule tactics to maintain its power. Since, 2011, the country has been put on what I previously called in the ‘state of exception’. Of course, the position of the first may be interpreted in that manner, but definitely, not the position of the young university student. Hers is a different perspective. I admire it.
*The writer is a co-coordinator of the Marx School, Colombo, Negombo and Kandy. e-mail:sumane_l@yahoo.com

Gajendrakumar at UN calls for transitional administration to safeguard Tamil Nation

TamilNet[TamilNet, Friday, 15 March 2013, 15:48 GMT]
Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam, the president of Tamil National Peoples' Front (TNPF), who addressed the UPR Review session in Geneva on Friday, has called for an internationally supervised transitional administration of the Tamil homeland in the North and East of the island of Sri Lanka. Noting that the genuine grievances and aspirations of Eezham Tamils are reduced to “mere individual human rights problems” rather than the “destruction of their Nation”, Mr. Gajendrakumar, who represented the NGO, International Education Development (IED), at the UN forum called for independent international investigation on Sri Lanka. In a carefully drafted statement, he further said that the UPR is “de-Tamilized” to the point that, anyone not fully cognizant of the facts of the 65 year long Tamil-Sinhala conflict would not even know who is to be a party to “reconciliation.” 

Following is the full text of the presentation made by Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam at the UPR Review at Geneva on Friday, under item 6, General Debate, 39th Meeting 22nd Regular Session Human Rights Council:

Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam
International Educational Development has followed the progress of the UPR since its inception. Now, in its second cycle we note a decided failure of some States to implement the recommendations of the first review - as is glaringly apparent in the second review of Sri Lanka. 

The review of Sri Lanka also demonstrates the paucity of opportunities for a people, such as the Tamil people, who identify as a collective political entity – that is as a Nation - based on historical independence, ethnicity, language and customs to be heard and taken into account. Their genuine grievances and aspirations are reduced to mere individual human rights problems rather than the destruction of their Nation. Sadly, except for one statement made by Austria concerning the rape of Tamil women, the Tamils as a people are not even named—the UPR is “de-Tamilized” to the point that, anyone not fully cognizant of the facts of the 65 year long Tamil-Sinhala conflict would not even know who is to be a party to “reconciliation.” 

Indeed it was the systematic dismantling of the existence of the Tamils as a distinct Nation in Sri Lanka that led to the 26-year-long war. We are alarmed with the government’s assertion that it aims to create “a true Sri Lankan identity,” which in Sri Lanka is a code term for “a Sinhala Buddhist State.” 

At this juncture, we call for the establishment of a transitional administration, under international supervision, in the North and East of Sri Lanka – the traditional homeland of the Tamils – as an urgent measure to stop the on-going destruction of the Tamil people. 

Finally, taking note that the Government rejects all recommendations most likely to bring about accountability and remedy as required by international humanitarian law, we urge an independent international investigation.

Sri Lanka issue: DMK threatens to pull out ministers
By, TNN | Mar 16, 2013
CHENNAI: The UPA's key ally DMK on Friday threatened to pull out of the Union governmentif the Centre failed to support an amended USresolution against Sri Lanka to be moved at the March 21 UN session.
, TNN | Mar 16, 2013, 12.18 AM IST


 

Lanka row: DMK threatens to pull out of cabinet


Lanka row: DMK threatens to pull out of cabinetDMK chief M Karunanidhi said in a statement, "India should take all efforts to bring about amendments in the US-sponsored resolution inthe UNHRC which should seek an independent probe into the genocide by the Lankan government." The resolution should also seek to identify the war criminals, he said.

It must recommend strong action against them, he said. The DMK has five representatives in the Union government, including Karunanidhi's son M K Alagiri, who is a Union minister.

Karunanidhi said, "The DMK's continuance in the Union ministry will turn meaningless if India fails". In recent days, the DMK chief has stepped up pressure on the Centre, strongly criticising statements of Congress leaders, including Union external affairs minister Salman Khurshid and party spokesperson Abishek Manu Singvi on the issue. Karunanidhi said the party has faced "only disappointment" from the Union government with regard to its stand on the Lanka issue. The DMK chief wondered what flawed logic impelled the Indian government to treat the island nation as a friendly neighbour.

Karunanidhi criticized Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and warned the UPA government saying, "The situation is reaching a flashpoint. We cannot watch silently." Last year too, the DMK resorted to similar posturing on the eve of session of the UNHRC when the US moved a resolution against Sri Lanka. Photographs of 12-year-old Balachandran, son of the slain LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran, circulated by Channel 4 recently have given pro-Tamil outfits fresh ammunition for their anti-Lanka campaign. The DMK too has been quick to seize the opportunity in raising the pro-Tamil pitch.

This is the fourth time in the last two years that the DMK is threatening to pull out its ministers from the Union government on the Sri Lanka issue and to demand a roll back of the petrol price hike. A senior DMK MP said that this time the party leadership was serious in its stand. "If the Union government fails to ensure amendments in the US resolution then we will be forced to pull out ministers. Stalin has been pressuring our leader to take a final decision in this regard," he said. The DMK-back Tamil Eelam Supporters' Organisation (TESO) has working hard for the Lankan tamil welfare in the past one year. "But Tamils are reluctant to support us wholeheartedly because of our alliance with the Congress," the MP said.

The issue figured in the Parliament with DMK leader T R Baalu making a strong statement in the Lok Sabha "The students agitation, day by day, has become very tense. I do not know what will happen. I can only remind my friends what happened in 1965 on the language (anti-Hindi) issue. The agitation on language issue has cost the Congress to a very great extent. The congress has lost its rule in TN in 1965 and till now they could not come to power in TN," he said.

BBS Saffron Brigade And A Nation In Tears Forever

By Sharmini Serasinghe -March 16, 2013 |
Sharmini Serasinghe
Colombo Telegraph‘Buddhist Sri Lanka’ perceived as the ‘sole protector’ of the Dhamma is where all beings irrespective of caste, creed, religion or race are supposed to live in peace, compassion and harmony. Then why is this tiny tear-drop shaped nation in the vast Indian Ocean destined forever to be in tears? Where did Buddhism go wrong for Lanka? Or should it be where was Buddhism made to go wrong for Lanka?
Never before in recent history has the populace of this comparatively ‘small’ country – Sinhala, Tamil and Muslim – been as ‘largely’ polarized as we see now. Physically we are so very near to one another but yet so far apart. For today we are a nation where not only are the Sinhalese and Tamils surveying each other with fear and suspicion, but the Sinhalese and Muslims as well. Whodunit!
With the embers of an ugly and unfortunate civil war still glowing, we are now beginning to feel the ominous signs of yet another episode of racial intolerance emerging, this time with the Buddhist flag being brandished against the ‘other’. Clearly there is another blood-bath on the horizon for Lanka.
In the absence of a strong political will to nip this malady in the bud, the ‘Guardians’ of Buddhism in Sri Lanka, the Mahasangha, too, have taken to maintaining a stoic silence. It was only very recently and coincidentally in perfect timing with the Geneva debacle, that one of these ‘Guardians’ of Buddhism appeared to have been jolted into action and thus issued a nonsensical and incongruous statement reported in the Sunday Leader of 10th March 2013 under the caption “Asgiriya Chapter puts BBS on notice”.
This lame statement claims that they of the Asgiriya Chapter do not accept ‘some’ of the actions of the Bodu Bala Sena. The stress on the pronoun ‘some’ sticks out as a sore thumb. This could only imply that the extremist BBS Saffron Brigade not only enjoys the tacit approval and blessings of the reigning political leaders but the ‘Guardians’ of Buddhism in Lanka the Mahasangha as well, of all what the BBS stands for except ‘some’. This ‘some’ could mean anything or nothing.
If this is the interpretation of the Buddhist philosophy, practiced by the Mahasangha, then this ‘Buddhist’ country is better off without such hypocrites.
For they are then nothing but ‘Buddhist ornaments’; therefore a lame excuse for Buddhists let alone wear the mantle of the Mahasangha.
In this context all what our elected leaders including this ‘Mahasangha’ seem to be able to do is only pay mere lip-service to this ruckus. By this they seem to be implying to the Saffron Brigade “Do as you do, and don’t mind what I say”.
There are those blinded by misguided loyalty who take umbrage at the very suggestion that our ‘faultless’ elected political leaders and the oh-so-holy Mahasangha can never say or do wrong. In the minds of some of these individuals, those who accuse their holier-than-though leaders of fanning the flames of religious extremism must be either NGOs or paid by NGOs to sling mud. The truth always hurts, sometimes a lot!
They would have to be either extremely naive or endowed with limited gray-matter to believe that our political leaders in governance, ably supported by the ‘mute’ Mahasangha have ‘nothing to do’ with the gloom that is unfolding before our very eyes. After all what do they, the ruling politicians, care what becomes of the Muslims, as they don’t get their vote anyway!
What appears stark as daylight is that as long as they at the political top, including their pampered and willingly manipulated Mahasangha, are afforded the privilege of basking in the glory of self aggrandizement and all that entails the ‘good life’, that’s all they care about.
They don’t essentially give a damn or a hoot that Lanka may be entering the throes of yet another smouldering blood-bath that would ultimately leave our country in a pile of ash and rubble. After all what do they care, it’s only the common man out there who will suffer and get killed, not them. Déjà vu!
What they our elected political leaders appear to be saying but not saying is never mind the Muslims, they are getting too big for their boots anyway. So let them be rattled a bit and put in their place as long as we don’t appear to be doing it. Hence the Saffron Brigade marches forward to attend to the needful.
Then there are those languishing in ‘Camps for the Homeless’ in the North and East, torn apart from their families and places they once called home, taken over and occupied by the Army. What our elected political leaders seem to be implying to them through their sheer lack of will to resolve their issues is – never mind they voted for the Swan anyway, so let them suffer it out as those who vote for ‘others’ will be shown no mercy.
And as for the Sinhalese what our elected political leaders appear to be implying by denying them the democratic right to plan their families to suit their purse is, let them produce more, more and more so we will have more, more and more Sinhalabuddhist votes. Never mind if they are malnourished and uneducated they can still vote.
Let our elected political leaders and others not be bothered by such above-mentioned trivialities. For very soon there is an event of far greater importance that must be celebrated come hell or high water, the great ‘Victory Day’ in the month of May.
Never mind that thousands of the innocent perished and became refugees in the name of this ‘Victory Day’. They were after all a mere insignificant collateral cost because “We Won the War”. That appears to be what our elected political leaders are saying but not saying.
At a saner level might we ask does this ‘Victory Day’ need to be celebrated with such vulgar pomp and pageantry? Can it not be a day of reflection on all that ails the political system of Lanka? Do we need an annual reminder in such a crass and tasteless way of the mistakes of our own political forefathers? Should this not be rightfully a day of moaning instead of one to be celebrated? Do we have to make it so obvious to the world that we are today a nation marching backwards?
As a Buddhist might I ask our ruling political leaders: cannot, at least for one day on this day, some compassion and sensitivity be shown towards all those who gave life and limb to make this day possible? Didn’t we kill off our own and not an unwelcome foreign invader?
“Oh no!” I hear that ominous voice of our elected political leaders.
Yes they don’t see it that way and to hell with those who don’t see things their way. For this is an all important day that must be celebrated loudly and most visibly as possible and at any cost. For this is the day when The Emperor dons his ‘Victory Day’ cloak to cover his otherwise nakedness and impress the masses that there is no other such as he!
The vote to remain forever in power wins at the end of the day!
*Sharmini Serasinghe was Director Communications of the former Secretariat for Coordinating the Peace Process (SCOPP) under Secretary Generals Jayantha Dhanapala and Dr. John Gooneratne. She counts over thirty years in journalism in both the print and electronic media.