Peace for the World

Peace for the World
First democratic leader of Justice the Godfather of the Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle: Honourable Samuel James Veluppillai Chelvanayakam

Friday, March 8, 2013


Reporters Without Borders Awards Vietnamese blogger Huynh Ngoc Chenh

REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS AWARDS VIETNAMESE BLOGGER HUYNH NGOC CHENH

Reporters Without BordersPUBLISHED ON THURSDAY 7 MARCH 2013. UPDATED ON FRIDAY 8 MARCH 2013.
Reporters Without Borders, with support from Google, Thursday awarded its Netizen of the Year 2013 award to Vietnamese blogger Huynh Ngoc Chenh.
Reporters Without Borders chose the nominees and more than 40,000 Internet users visited the YouTube site from around the world. They selected the winner on Reporters’ You Tube Channel. The award ceremony will take place in Paris on March 12 at the Google office on the occasion of the World Day against Cyber ​​Censorship.
Huynh Ngoc Chenh is one of Vietnam’s most influential blogger. His blog attracts about 15,000 visitors per day, even though readers must use software to circumvent censorship to gain access. Chenh criticizes the government and defends freedom of expression. He focuses on issues of democracy, human rights and the territorial disputes between Vietnam and China. Authorities have threatened him numerous times for his articles and police monitor his communications.
“This award represents an inspiration to me as well as for all bloggers, independent journalists in Vietnam, those who face the restrictions about the right of freedom of expression,” Huynh Ngoc Chenh said by telephone from Ho Chi Minh City. “It demonstrates the world community’s support and will make us more audacious in raising our concerns and continue our struggle for freedom of information. It will help people scared off and speaking out.”
Vietnam is on the list of "Enemies of the Internet" by Reporters Without Borders and is the 172nd out of 179 in the latest World Press Freedom Index. Bloggers and other netizens are facing particular repression. Their relatives are also harassed and threatened. The authorities have stepped up efforts to increase surveillance and remove "sensitive" contents. On January 9, 14 dissidents - including 8 bloggers and citizen-journalists - were sentenced to prison terms ranging from 3 to 13 years.
With 31 bloggers and citizen-journalists currently behind bars, Vietnam is the third largest prison in the world for netizens behind China and Oman.
“We are pleased to award this prize to a courageous Vietnamese blogger and thereby recognize the activities of online news providers in a country marked by draconian censorship and growing surveillance of dissidents,” Reporters Without Borders secretary-general Christophe Deloire said.
“Despite the risks, bloggers and netizens continue to inform their fellow citizens. In Vietnam, they now fill the void left by the state-run media, which are subjected to very strict news control and relay the government’s views. By tackling subjects that are sensitive but of general interest, Huynh Ngoc Chenh helps freedom of information to progress in his country. He is an example for netizens all over the world to follow.”
Today, according to Google, some 40 countries are engaged in Internet censorship. Google was the first company to publish a Transparency report that shows interruptions to the flow of information from our tools and services. Google also is a founding member of the Global Network Initiative, a multi-stakeholder organization — including human rights and press freedom groups, investors, academics, and companies — whose members commit to protect online free expression.
“We’re proud to support Reporters Without Borders with this important prize that highlights the pressure many governments around the globe are are putting on the Internet,” said William Echikson, Head of Free Expression for Europe, Africa and Middle-East at Google. “Our 
products 
‐‐ 
from
 search 
and 
Blogger
 to 
YouTube 
and 
Google
 Docs
 ‐‐ 
have 
been 
blocked
 in more than 
25 
of 
the
 approximately
 150
 countries 
where 
we 
offer 
our 
services. Initiatives such as the Netizen prize shine a light on those who stand up in support for online free expression.”
Reporters Without Borders launched the World Day against cyber-censorship back in 2008 in order to protect a single Internet, free and accessible to all. Google has partnered with Reporters Without Borders in 2010 to award the annual Netizen who recognizes a user, blogger or cyber-dissident who has distinguished himself by his advocacy of Internet freedom of expression.
Reporters Without Borders will release on March 12 the 2013 Enemies of the Internet report, a special issue dedicated to online surveillance that points out to a selection of countries and companies

Video: Tangalle killing: British MP to complain to Queen

FRIDAY, 08 MARCH 2013 
British MP Simon Danczuk, who arrived in Sri Lanka to seek justice for his constituent Khuram Shaikh, said today he would take this matter up with the Queen and urge her to boycott the Commonwealth Summit in November.
“I have already brought the issue in the British Parliament. I will inform the Queen and also the British Foreign Ministry as well,” he said.
Mr. Danczuk said he was disappointed at how this matter had been handled and the fact that senior Sri Lankan ministers had refused to meet him.
The slain Khuram Shaikh’s brother Nasir Shaikh had earlier pledged to continue the campaign until justice was meted out to his Brother.
WATCH


Pix by Pradeep Pathirana

Lanka not given up hopes
2013-03-08
Cabinet Spokesperson, Minister of Mass Media and Information, Keheliya Rambukwella, said Sri Lanka has not given up hope as far as the US-sponsored resolution at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is concerned.

Addressing the media yesterday, the minister said, "We have not seen the resolution yet, and neither has India. So the government cannot make any hypotheses about the resolution. We are unfailingly following the course of action we originally set out to follow regarding the matter of these allegations that have been levelled against us. We ask that the suggestions in our Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) report be examined one by one, and our progress examined."


When queried about the stand taken by India, and the possibility of its leaning in favour of Sri Lanka, despite having previously said that it would vote against the island nation, the minister said, "If there is a change in their stance on the matter of the vote, then it must be due to the effectiveness of government representative, Mahinda Samarasinghe's methods of conveying the Sri Lankan message in Geneva."


Meanwhile, commenting on the recent spate of anti-Sri Lankan activities in India, especially the attack on the Mihin Lanka premises on 6 March, he said, "It is to be expected when doing business in another country, but we are continuing discussions about this matter, because it is abundantly clear that political motives are behind these incidents."

For Mohan Peiris Corporal Punishment Is Trivial And Victims Should Not Complain To Courts

By Colombo Telegraph -March 8, 2013
Colombo TelegraphHuman rights activists are appalled at the statement of Mohan Pieris, the de facto Chief Justice, made recently when he declared open a Circuit Court at Manampitiya, that some persons file fundamental rights cases even for trivial reasons. According to a Daily Mirror report, Mohan Pieris has stated that some even file fundamental rights cases when a teacher twisted a boy’s ear.
Mohan Pieris
An academic well-versed in human rights law, who spoke to Colombo Telegraph on the condition of anonymity, said that twisting the ear of a pupil is corporal punishment which has been banned by the Department of Education.
A child rights activist told Colombo Telegraph that Mohan Peiris’ statement would be an encouragement to teachers who still violate the circular of the Department of Education banning all forms of corporal punishment. There have been cases of teachers targeting particular students for various reasons ranging from caste issues to resistance to sexual advances. A child psychologist said that Mohan Peiris had given an open license to school teachers to violate Departmental regulations on corporal punishment. There have been cases of school children refusing to go to school because of being targeted by particular teachers. Some children may even be driven to suicide, the child psychologist warned.
A human rights lawyer told Colombo Telegraph that Article 11 of the Constitution prohibits not only torture but also cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment. Twisting the ear of a student in the view of the entire class may be degrading to the student concerned although another student may not feel bad about it. In any case, corporal punishment is on the way out all over the world. The provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, to which Sri Lanka is a party, is also important for child punishment, as Article 19 states: “Parties shall take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social and educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation.”
In January 2005, the Supreme Court of Nepal declared that parents, other family members and teachers no longer have a defence for “minor beating” of a child under the Children Act 1992. The Court issued a directive order to the Office of the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers, asking them “to pursue appropriate and effective measures to prevent physical punishment as well as other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment or abuse being imposed or inflicted on, or likely to be imposed or inflicted on children”. The decision followed an application made by the Center for Victims of Torture. Section 7 of the 1992 Act, protecting children from cruelty and abuse, stated that “any act by the mother, father, family member, guardian or teacher to scold the child or give him/her minor beating for the sake of his or her interests shall not be deemed to violate this section.” The words “or give him/her minor beating” were declared null and void by the Court, as being inappropriate and contrary to the Constitution.
A child rights activist stated that the National Child Protection Authority should immediately take up the matter with the Government. Mohan Pieris should be impeached for encouraging the violation of the Constitution, the rights activist stated.

SL can teach human rights to US and EU says CJ

THURSDAY, 07 MARCH 2013 
Chief Justice Mohan Peiris has said that Sri Lanka could teach lessons on human rights to the US and  the EU although they are trying to teach human rights to Sri Lanka now in Geneva.

One year ago Mohan Peiris wasdefending GoSL anti human Rights postion at UN HRC
“Today at the Geneva conference, the European commission and the US have joined hands to dictate terms to us on human rights. They started to talk about human rights after the second world war, but as a nation we have a 2500-year-old tradition of  human rights protection. In fact, we can teach them some lessons in human rights. Today we have the opportunity to enjoy freedom but it would be a reality only if we uphold the rule of law. Any matter that could not be solved through the officials could be brought to my notice by sending a postcard to my address at Colombo 12,” the Chief Justice said.

Chief Justice Mohan Peiris also asked the public to send him a postcard stating their grievances if they cannot solve them through the officials and authorities in the areas, he would provide relief on the part of the judiciary.

Addressing a public meeting at Bakamuna following the opening of the Bakamuna circuit court building he stressed that the services of the judiciary were now available to the people at their doorstep.

“I as the Chief Justice would carry out my duties in a humble manner. I am a person who respects and believes in religion. Sometimes I have a fear about my responsibilities as well. But when I came here and saw I gained confidence. There is nothing to fear. If there is a problem you cannot solve through the officials in the area take a postcard, write it and send to the Chief Justice, Colombo 12. You will get relief,” he said.  

“All those concerned including the justice ministry, judges and the lawyers have a major role in this process. It is their responsibility to respond to the grievances of the people’s sensitively. If the judiciary is not sensitive, the law will serve no purpose. However, it is the duty of the people to respect the judiciary that protects their rights.(Kanchana Kumara Ariyadasa )

Sexist Remarks: Minister Should Not Have Referred To My Looks And Womanhood – Rosy


By Colombo Telegraph -December 3, 2012 
Colombo Telegraph“I consider it as an insult. The minister should not have referred to my looks and womanhood in that manner,” says UNP MP Rosy Senanayake. Rosy Senanayake made these remarks against Transport Minister Kumara Welgama today.
Rosy Senanayake
Transport Minister Kumara Welgama told Parliament today he had no words to express his feelings towards UNP MPRosy Senanayake whom he described as ‘a charming and beautiful lady’. The Minister made these remarks when a question was directed at him by Rosay Senanayake during question time, according to Daily Mirror.
“I am so happy to answer a question by a beauty queen like Rosy Senanayake.   You are such a charming woman. I have no words to describe my feelings,” the minister said. He said, “I cannot explain my feelings here. But if you meet me outside Parliament, I will describe them.”
At this point, United National Party (UNP) MP Gamini Jayawickrama Perera made some remarks against the minister, Daily Mirror reported.
Rosy Senanayake said there was no need for the minister to make these remarks merely because of her as a woman. “I never insult women. It is a fact known to everybody,” the minister said.
Related posts;

India minister Jaiswal taken to court over 'sexist' remark

Mr Jaiswal said he was "joking"
Sriprakash Jaiswal
BBCA court case has been filed against a senior Indian minister for his remark that wives lose their appeal with age.
Non-governmental organisation Lakshya has accused Coal Minister Sriprakash Jaiswal of making obscene and defamatory remarks.
Mr Jaiswal has apologised for the comments he made at a poetry meeting.
He said he had been quoted out of context and that he was joking when he made the remarks. He said he did "not want to insult women".
Petitioner Anita Dua of Lakshya, an organisation based in the northern city of Kanpur where Mr Jaiswal made the comment, lodged her complaint in the court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate NK Pandey on Wednesday.
'Unfortunate'
Her lawyer said they had submitted a recording of Mr Jaiswal's comments to the magistrate and that Ms Dua has been asked to appear in court on 8 October.
Several women's groups in India have expressed outrage and said Mr Jaiswal's comments were "very unfortunate".
The minister made the remarks at a Hindi language poetry meeting on Monday night.
He was referring to the Indian cricket team winning a game against Pakistan in the ongoing World T20 championship in Sri Lanka.
"New victory and new wedding, both of them have their own importance. As time will pass, the victory will become old," Mr Jaiswal was reported as telling the meeting.
"As time passes, wife also becomes old, that charm does not sustain".
After footage of Mr Jaiswal's comments was aired on TV channels, women's groups and opposition parties criticised the minister and demanded an apology.
The main opposition BJP said the minister had made a "sexist remark" and called him "insensitive".
The chairman of the National Commission for Women, Mamta Sharma, said the minister's comments were "very unfortunate".

GTWF - IWD - March 2013.pdf - Google Drive

Sri Lanka: Today women are extremely vulnerable to violence, discrimination and deprivation of their fundamental human rights

SRI LANKA BRIEFFRIDAY, MARCH 8, 2013

STATEMENT BY MIGRANT FORUM LANKA (MFL) ON SRI LANKAN WOMEN MIGRANT WORKERS

Today, on International Women’s Day 2013, Migrant Forum Lanka (MFL), a collective of local Sri Lankan civil society organizations, trade unions, researchers, lawyers and activists, takes the opportunity to underscore the importance of Sri Lankan women migrant workers and promote the protection of their human rights before, during and beyond the migration process.

This year’s global theme of, “A promise is a promise: Time for action to end violence against women”, is of particular relevance to women migrant workers who are extremely vulnerable to violence, discrimination and deprivation of their fundamental human rights. With a serious lack of protection mechanisms in place, women domestic workers especially face working conditions akin to slavery including physical and sexual abuse, religious and racial discrimination, lack of freedom of movement, association and expression in host countries and social stigma and unequal economic opportunities at home.

Migrant Forum Lanka calls upon the government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) to improve existing MOUs into legally binding bilateral agreements with host country governments which address the human and labour rights of women migrant workers, including equal rights, especially personal safety, under host country domestic labour laws, standardised remuneration and access to all amenities.

The wrongful execution of Sri Lankan domestic migrant worker Rizana Nafeek on 09 January 2013 who was sentenced to death by a court in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia at the age of 17 in 2005 was a tragedy which shocked the world. It clearly demonstrates the dangers faced by women domestic workers who are almost completely unprotected by host country laws. Sri Lanka however continues to send women domestic workers to Saudi Arabia without any visible efforts to strengthen protection mechanisms.

Migrant Forum Lanka demands that the GoSL amend legislation to regulate sub agents and impose swift punishment on human traffickers under the Penal Code Amendment (Amendment) Act No 16 of 2006 and widen the definition of trafficking to include dissemination of false information by recruiting agents especially to women domestic workers regarding conditions of and nature of work, remuneration, unlawfully forcing migrant women to sign multiple employment contracts and the commodification of women by offering them financial assistance to entice them to work abroad in potentially abusive conditions.

We urge better collaborative efforts between Sri Lankan foreign employment, labour, immigration, external affairs, other relevant authorities and consular officials to monitor migration flows to address issues of irregular migration and trafficking especially of underage girls, for purposes of prostitution and slavery and to assist women workers who have fled abusive employment situations. GoSL needs to urgently address the situation of Sri Lankan migrant workers in detention camps and prisons across all host countries to prevent any miscarriages of justice and to protect women migrant worker detainees from being subject to physical and sexual abuse.

As one of the few South Asian countries with heavy female migration of women domestic migrant workers, and an economy which is primarily dependent on their remittances, GoSL has both a duty and obligation to protect its women migrant workers. Although Sri Lanka is the only South Asian country to have ratified the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, implementation within the country remains ineffective and inadequate.

Migrant Forum Lanka calls upon the government of Sri Lanka to effectively implement the National Labour Migration Policy of 2008 which reflects the law, spirit and essence of the Migrant Workers Convention including reintegration of women into society upon return through providing them equal employment opportunities and addressing the many social issues of female labour migration.

Women domestic workers are one of the most vulnerable groups and face extreme discrimination, violence and violations due to their unique situation. We therefore urge the GoSL to ratify the ILO Convention

Concerning Decent Work for Domestic Workers - C189 - which asserts that countries are required to take adequate measures to respect, promote and realize the fundamental principles and rights at work, such as: freedom of association, right to collective bargaining, minimum wages, the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labour, effective abolition of child labour, issuing of standard written contracts and the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation. Most if not all domestic workers are women, and the ratification and implementation of C189 would act as a deterrent against violation of rights in the country of origin, whilst setting the standards for ‘decent work’ to be negotiated with host country governments.

On this International Women’s Day, Migrant Forum Lanka urges the government of Sri Lanka, the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka, Sri Lankan Civil Society to work collectively and with their counterparts in host countries to ensure that Sri Lankan women who migrate for work do so in conditions of safety, respect, freedom, dignity and equity.
07 March 2013


GLOBAL TAMIL WOMEN FORUM (GTWF) 'INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY' STATEMENT -- "THE PLIGHT OF TAMIL WOMEN IN SRI LANKA"


GTWF - IWD - March 2013.pdf - Google Drive





The Worth Of A Woman

By Ruwantissa Abeyratne -March 8, 2013
Dr Ruwantissa Abeyratne
Colombo Telegraph“None of us is equal until all of us is equal”
“Women are not making it to the top. A hundred and ninety heads of state; nine are women. Of all the people in parliament in the world, 13 per cent are women. In the corporate sector, [the share of] women at the top—C-level jobs, board seats—tops out at 15, 16 percent.”… Sheryl Sandberg
Today, 8 March, is International Women’s Day.
We have had a terrible past year.    The gang-rape of Jyoti Singh Pandey, a 23-year-old student in Mumbai, led to a global outcry against the brutalization of women and girls. Another tragic story that made international news was the attack on Malala Yousufzai, a 15-year-old Pakistani girl shot by the Taliban for saying girls should have the right to education.  This is in addition to regular violence against women in Congo, the fight by women in Russia for the adoption of laws against domestic violence, and child marriage and imprisonment of women’s rights activists elsewhere.
From its inception, the United Nations has recognized that there is discrimination against women in the world.  This is a fact and no one can deny it.  There is also wide spread abuse of women and violence committed against them   in many parts of the world (reportedly 7 out of 10 women are subjected to this terror), but that is another story best left for another time.   The UN story starts with Article 3 of its Charter (signed in 1945) which states that the fundamental aim of the Charter is to achieve international co-operation … in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.”
One of the first tasks of the United Nations was to establish, through its Economic and Social Council, a Commission on the Status of Women, as the principal global policy-making body dedicated exclusively to gender equality and advancement of women.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights says: “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights” and “everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in the Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, … birth or other status.
In 1979, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which is an International Bill of Rights for Women. The Convention defines discrimination against women as “…any distinction, exclusion or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the effect or purpose of impairing or nullifying the recognition, enjoyment or exercise by women, irrespective of their marital status, on a basis of equality of men and women, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural, civil or any other field.” 
In its 30 articles, the Convention sets up an agenda for national action to end  discrimination against women, by focusing on culture and tradition as influential forces shaping gender roles and family relations, and it is the first human rights treaty to affirm the reproductive rights of women.
UN Women Executive Director Michelle Bachelet, in her message for International Women’s Day, has called on the international community to deliver on their commitments and to protect women’s right to live free of violence.
Although the above discussion is of the most fundamental importance, much has been said, and hopefully done about it.  This article is more about the value, worth and equality of women.  International Women’s Day should also be about recognizing women for who they are and not only for  what they are subjected to.
Anne-Marie Slaughter, a woman who held one of the top jobs in Washington before which she was a law  professor at Princeton, a woman who left a position of power to be with her family,  in her article entitled “Why Women Still Can’t Have it All”  in the Atlantic says : “It’s time to stop fooling ourselves,: the women who have managed to be both mothers and top professionals are superhuman, rich, or self-employed”.
Slaughter says, quite correctly that there are still real barriers and obstacles for women in the working place.  “Some are single mothers; many struggle to find any job; others support husbands who cannot find jobs. Many cope with a work life in which good day care is either unavailable or very expensive; school schedules do not match work schedules; and schools themselves are failing to educate their children. Many of these women are worrying not about having it all, but rather about holding on to what they do have. And although women as a group have made substantial gains in wages, educational attainment, and prestige over the past three decades, the economists Justin Wolfers and Betsey Stevenson have shown that women are less happy today than their predecessors were in 1972, both in absolute terms and relative to men.
The best hope for improving the lot of all women, and for closing what Wolfers and Stevenson call a “new gender gap”—measured by well-being rather than wages—is to close the leadership gap: to elect a woman president and 50 women senators; to ensure that women are equally represented in the ranks of corporate executives and judicial leaders. Only when women wield power in sufficient numbers will we create a society that genuinely works for all women. That will be a society that works for everyone”.
Anne-Marie Slaughter speaks of opportunities, or lack thereof at the workplace for women.  It is also opportune to speak of their worth.
Nicholas D. Kristoff, Pulitzer Prize winning columnist for the New York Times has said: “women are more likely to invest money or assets in their children or small business, and men are more likely to spend on instant gratification, like alcohol, cigarettes, prostitution”.   Kristoff goes on to add: “In any 10-year period, more girls are discriminated against to death than all of the people who died in all the genocides of the 20th century.”
According to the Cosmopolitan, a study done by the University of Georgia and  Columbia University has found that women learn better than men do.   They are more attentive, flexible and open their minds further than do men.  According to a study of IQs from around the world, women have higher IQs than men. Researcher James Flynn checked out the IQs of people from the U.S., Europe, Canada, New Zealand, Argentine, and Estonia, and found that women came out on top. A study from San Diego State University of offices across the U.S. found that men’s desks and offices have more germs  than women’s. Researchers discovered that men had anywhere from 10 to 20 per cent more bacteria in their workspaces than women—and scientists say it’s because they tend to be less hygienic.   And here’s a good one: A recent study has revealed that women are getting better looking through evolution; meanwhile, men are staying the same. After following more than 2,000 people through four decades of life, the study showed that attractive women had 16 per cent more children than average-looking chicks and that beautiful people are 36 per cent more likely to have a daughter as their firstborn. All those gorgeous daughters mean more beautiful women than in past generations.
It could be that we measure a woman’s worth through our understanding of ancient writings and practices.  According to the Bible, a woman is worth about half as much as a man.  “And thy estimation shall be of the male from twenty years old even unto sixty years old, even thy estimation shall be fifty shekels of silver…. And if it be a female, then thy estimation shall be thirty shekels.  And if it be from five years old even unto twenty years old, then thy estimation shall be of the male twenty shekels, and for the female ten shekels”.  Leviticus 27:3-7.
Ven. K. Sri Dhammananda Maha Thera says:  “the social attitude towards women in pre-Buddhist days can be traced from the early Vedic literature, such as the Rigveda. There is evidence indicating the honor and respect which women received in their homes. In the realm of religion, too, they had access to the highest knowledge of the Absolute or Brahma. However, such a liberal attitude towards women changed with the course of time, under the influence and dominance of the priestly caste with their priestcrafts, animal sacrifices, and other ritualistic practices. New interpretations were given to the scriptures. Women came to be considered as greatly inferior to men – both physically and mentally.
A woman was looked down upon as a mere possession or a thing. Her place was the home, under the complete whims and fancies of her husband. She not only had to perform all the domestic chores, but also had to bring up a large family. Some of the priestly caste Brahmins married and lived with their wives, yet regarded food cooked by women as impure and unfit to eat. A myth was built up – that all women were regarded as sinful and the only way to keep them out of mischief was to keep them endlessly occupied with the task of motherhood and domestic duties”.
The statement which grabbed me the most was about the women of Ghana, made in November 2011 by the Honorable Betty Mould-Iddrisu, Minister of Justice and Attorney-General.  “The contribution of women in our society cannot be over emphasized. The role they play in paying their national dues is worth applauding. In my opinion, women carry the bread basket of the country. No matter how minute their effort is, we cannot write it off.
My little observation has exposed me to the fact that, most women double as wives and breadwinners as well. From dawn to dusk, most women are on the move just to provide the basic necessities of life for their family. My question is, do these women get appreciated or acknowledged for their contribution? The most recent Volta Lake disaster recorded a high percentage of women with their children strapped to their back who lost their lives, “carrying the bread basket of their family.” They were coming from the market, which is a routine chore. What will women not do just to keep their family going?”
International Women’s Day should also be about recognizing the worth of women. They are compassionate and adaptable. They motivate those around them, be they friends or family, co-workers or bosses.  They glue families together and serve as the link between a father and his children.   Let’s see men do these things.
Happy International Women’s Day.


logoFRIDAY, 08 MARCH 2013 


‘Women for Rights’ held an agitation at Lipton Circus and a seminar at the Public Library in Colombo today (8th) to commemorate the 103rd International Women’s Day. They called a stop for violence, rape and oppression against women.
The seminar has been addressed by the Ambassadress of Cuba her Excellency Indira Lopes.


Video: Rings The Bell To End Violence Against Women

Colombo Telegraph
Rings The Bell To End Violence Against Women-March 7, 2013
One million men. One million promises calls on men worldwide to promise to take concrete action to end violence against women.
Men and women together have responded with outrage to recent dramatic acts of violence from Delhi to Cairo to Steubenville. We know that effective laws, courts, and cops are essential — but they are not enough. We need individual and community action to challenge the habits and norms that perpetuate violence.
Men, their allies, and their actions, can create that global tipping point, today. 
Together with our partners in South Africa, Brazil, Sweden, and more, we will secure one million promises in one year, starting March 8, 2013 (International Women’s Day).
With men as leaders and partners, we can build a world in which women are safe — and in which all of us live freely, fully, and without fear. 
Please join us on March 8 and beyond. 
http://breakthrough.tv

Thursday, March 7, 2013


Thousands march with Chavez!

logoTHURSDAY, 07 MARCH 2013





Hugo Chavez's tearful supporters carried their dead president through Venezuelan streets still plastered with his smiling image, an epic farewell to a genuine revolutionary leader remembered simply as "our commander".
In a display of raw, and at times, unruly emotion, generations of Venezuelans, many dressed in the red of Chavez's socialist party, filled Caracas' streets to remember the man who dominated their country for 14 years before succumbing to cancer.
Chavez's flag-draped coffin floated over hundreds of thousands of supporters as it made its way atop an open hearse.
The funeral cortege that departed from the Carlos Arvelo Military Hospital, south Caracas, took seven hours to arrive at the Venezuelan Military Academy, southwest Caracas. Chavez's remains were accompanied by thousands of grieving supporters who paid their honors and expressed sadness at the death of the Venezuelan president.
Shortly before 6.00 p.m. on Wednesday, the remains of President Hugo Chávez arrived at the Venezuelan Military Academy, where he will be in state for three days. The coffin was accompanied by a cortege led by Executive Vice-President Nicolás Maduro and Bolivian President Evo Morales.
The ceremony was also attended by Argentina's Cristina Fernandez and Uruguay's José Mujica, as well as some cabinet members, including Interior Minister Néstor Reverol, Energy and Mining Minister Rafael Ramírez and Land and Transport Minister Juan García Toussaintt.
A simple ceremony was held with relatives of Hugo Chavez, and then the casket was moved to the Honor Courtyard of the Military Academy.
Chavez will be in state until Saturday 9th March according to Foreign Minister Elías Jaua.